- Nov 2022
-
gitlab.com gitlab.com
-
how was your code review experience with this merge request? Please tell us how we can continue to iterate and improve: Leave a 👍 or a 👎 on this comment to describe your experience.
-
- Sep 2022
- Feb 2022
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Kimberly Prather, Ph.D. (2022, January 11). This paper is not published..not reviewed...and has serious problems that will hopefully be fixed during the review process. The lead authors know this. See posts by me @linseymarr @jljcolorado . [Tweet]. @kprather88. https://twitter.com/kprather88/status/1481019341625724928
-
- Aug 2021
-
kimberlyhirsh.com kimberlyhirsh.com
-
https://kimberlyhirsh.com/2018/06/29/a-starttofinish-literature.html
Great overview of a literature review with some useful looking links to more specifics on note taking methods.
Most of the newer note taking tools like Roam Research, Obsidian, etc. were not available or out when she wrote this. I'm curious how these may have changed or modified her perspective versus some of the other catch-as-catch-can methods with pen/paper/index cards/digital apps?
-
-
kimberlyhirsh.com kimberlyhirsh.com
-
https://kimberlyhirsh.com/2019/04/01/dissertating-in-the.html
A description of some of Kimiberly Hirsh's workflow in keeping a public research notebook (or commonplace book).
I'd be curious to know what type of readership and response she's gotten from this work in the past. For some it'll bet it's possibly too niche for a lot of direct feedback, but some pieces may be more interesting than others.
Did it help her organize her thoughts and reuse the material later on?
-
- Jul 2021
-
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
-
u/dawnlxh. (2021). Reviewing peer review: does the process need to change, and how?. r/BehSciAsk. Reddit
-
- Dec 2020
-
www.npmjs.com www.npmjs.com
-
Patches can be reviewed as part of your normal review process, forks probably can't
-
- Oct 2020
-
-
But maybe this PR should still be merged until he finds time for that?
Tags
- not a blocker (issue dependency)
- pull request stalled
- waiting for maintainers to review / merge pull request / give feedback
- iterative process
- don't let big plans/goals get in the way of integrating/releasing smaller changes/improvements
- open-source software: progress seems slow
- big change/rewrite vs. continuous improvements / smaller refactorings
Annotators
URL
-
- Jul 2020
-
medium.com medium.com
-
Brock. J. (2020). Rapid Registered Reports initiative aims to stop coronavirus researchers following false leads. Nature index
-
- Jun 2020
-
oaspa.org oaspa.org
-
Scholarly publishers are working together to maximize efficiency during COVID-19 pandemic. (2020, April 27). OASPA. https://oaspa.org/scholarly-publishers-working-together-during-covid-19-pandemic/
-
- May 2020
-
-
Add-ons hosted on the AMO generally need to have their source code uploaded in an extra (really annoying) manual step.
-
-
extensionworkshop.com extensionworkshop.com
-
Issues brought up during review must be addressed using best efforts. If corrections have been requested, the new version should not contain unrelated changes, as this complicates the review process and can lead to further rejections.
-
During review, the add-on undergoes basic testing in addition to code review. To facilitate the functional testing, the add-on author must provide testing information and, if applicable, testing credentials required to use the add-on if an account is needed for any part of the add-on’s functionality.
-
-
extensionworkshop.com extensionworkshop.com
-
You can now distribute your add-on. Note, however, that your add-on may still be subject to further review, if it is you’ll receive notification of the outcome of the review later.
-