25 Matching Annotations
1. Nov 2023
2. www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
1. Cannot get it either to be honest. I want to use the antinet method for 2 main topics: Management and Personal growthIn management, for sure needs to add notion of leadership for example: how to approach the coding identification? I’ve assigned 2000 to management: shall I assign 2500 to all cards related to leadership? This is just an example, it’s a bit unclear for me so far.

The way you're currently thinking is a top down approach in which you already know everything and you're attempting to organize it to make it easier for others who know nothing about the ideas to find them. The Luhmann model supposes you know nothing about anything to begin with and you're attempting to create order from the bottom up, solely by putting related ideas you're building on close to each other and giving them numbers so that you might find them again when you need them.

If your only use is for those two topics and closely related subtopics and nothing else, then consider not using a Luhmann-artig model? Leave off the numbers and create two tabbed cards with those headings (and possibly related subheadings) and then sort your related cards behind them. (This is closer to the commonplace book tradition maintained on index cards and used by those like Mortimer J. Adler et al., Robert Greene, Ryan Holiday and Billy Oppenheimer. Example: https://billyoppenheimer.com/notecard-system/)

Otherwise the mistake you may be making is mentally associating the top level numbers with the topics. Break this habit! The numbers are only there so you can index ideas against them to be able to find them again! These numbers aren't like the Dewey Decimal system where 510.### will always mean something to do with math. You'll specifically want to intermingle disparate topics, so the only purpose the numbers provide is the ability to find what you're looking for by using the index which will give you a neighborhood in which you'll find the ideas you know are going to be hiding there or very near by.

Cards that are near to each other (using the numbers as an idea of ordering and re-finding) create a neighborhood of related ideas, even if they're disparate in topics. This might allow you to intermingle two related ideas, one which is in anthropology and another from mathematics for example, but which would otherwise potentially be thousands of cards away from each other if done in a Dewey-like system.

Or to take your example, what do you do with an idea that relates to both management AND personal growth? If it's closer to an idea on management you might place it near a related idea on that branch rather than in the personal growth section where it may be potentially less useful in the future. (You can always cross index them if need be, but place it where it creates the closest link and thus likely the greatest value for building on top of your previous ideas.)

For more on this, try: https://boffosocko.com/2022/10/27/thoughts-on-zettelkasten-numbering-systems/

I suspect that Scheper suggests using the Academic Outline of Disciplines as a numbering structure because it's an early choice he made for himself and it provides a perch to give people a concrete place to start. Sadly this does a disservice because it's closer to the older commonplace topical method rather than to the spirit of the ordering that Luhmann was doing. It's especially difficult for beginners who have a natural tendency to want to do this sort of top-down approach.

#### URL

3. Aug 2023
4. www.dreamsongs.com www.dreamsongs.com
1. Because this PDF does not include outline metadata, I have inserted jump points by highlighting the names of the chapter on the page where that chapter begins for each chapter in the book. These can be filtered by the "chapter heading" tag.

#### URL

5. Jul 2023
6. www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
1. I have been using the Outline of Knowledge (OoK) which Adler developed for the Propædia volume of the 15th edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica (orig. publ. 1974) as my way of indexing knowledge (there is a blog series describing this). I am now working on Part 7 of the series, which is concerned with porting from a card-based analogue system to a digital computer-based form, using the insights gained from having done so via the analogue approach initially.It appears as though the final version of the OoK which ever appeared was in 2010, and is archived at The Internet Archive.I am interested in whether anyone has continued using the OoK or has expanded upon it in any formalised or systematic way. I have made my own mods to it, of course, as it is several decades old and could bear with some revision. But I am not aware of any organisation or group that may already be doing this, including the Britannica itself (which seems a shame, if it is the case).Does anyone know of any such efforts?

u/TheVoroscope, the only things I've seen on it are the original and what you've written. I suspect anything current will be quite niche and would require searching in the areas of academic journal articles or at the level of graduate studies within the library sciences where you might find something. Simon Winchester had a section on the rise and downfall of the Encyclopedia Britannica in his most recent book Knowing What We Know (2023) which has a brief mention of the Propædia, but it was broadly described as a \$32 million dollar bomb that ended the Encyclopedia. I would suspect that the last printings in 2010 and 2012 were probably the last more as a result of the rise of internet usage than they were the form and function of the Propædia itself though.

#### URL

7. Jun 2023
8. blog.gurucomputing.com.au blog.gurucomputing.com.au
1. Setting up RedirectsOne last thing before we leave you, you’ll notice that you tend to get redirected to the blog as opposed to a wiki logon page. That’s done with one final caddy configuration, forcing you to read my blog if you try to go to an arbitrary URL (especially important if you are retiring old sites):NoneBashCSSCC#ElixirErlangGoGraphQLGroovyHaskellHTMLINIJavaJavaScriptJSONKotlinLispLuaMermaid DiagramNixObjective-COCamlPerlPHPPowershellPythonRubyRustScalaSQLSoliditySwiftTOMLTypeScriptVisual BasicYAMLZigKopierenkb.gurucomputing.com { @notBlog { not path /static* not path /doc* not path /s/* not path /auth* not path /realtime* not path /images* not path /locales* not path /api* not path /collaboration* not path /collection* } redir @notBlog /s/blog reverse_proxy http://outline }To get to the logon page, you instead navigate to a /doc or /collection subpath as opposed to the root of the site (and of course you still need authentication). And that’s how I made this blog.

#### URL

9. May 2023
10. www.reddit.com www.reddit.com

Based on my research, Scott Scheper was the one of the original source for people adopting the Academic Outline of Disciplines. I've heard him say before that he recommends it only as a potential starting place for people who are new to the space and need it as a crutch to get going. It's an odd suggestion as almost all of the rest of his system is so Luhmann-based. I suspect it's a quirk of how he personally started and once moving it was easier than starting over. He also used his own ZK for showing others, and it's hard to say one thing in a teaching video when showing people something else. Ultimately it's hard to mess up on numbering choices unless you're insistent on using only whole numbers or natural numbers. I generally wouldn't suggest complex numbers either, but you might find some interesting things within your system if you did. More detail: https://boffosocko.com/2022/10/27/thoughts-on-zettelkasten-numbering-systems/ The only reason to have any standardized base or standardized numbers would be if you were attempting to have a large shared ZK with others. If this is your intent, then perhaps look at the Universal Decimal Classification, though a variety of things might also work including Dewey Decimal.

#### URL

11. Feb 2023
12. blay.se blay.se
1. A sequence of Folgezetteln notes in the filenames of the Zettelns can from this perspective be considered a hardcoded outline and should be avoided, however convenient it seems.

And here he says it out loud... see https://hypothes.is/a/Gl5ferPsEe2Yf5P83a3wUg

#### URL

13. Jan 2023
14. www.edge.org www.edge.org
1. Wells's biggest work is Outline of History, published in 1920, a picture of cultural evolution as the main theme of history since the emergence of our species.

!- H.G. Wells : Outline of history - cultural evolution as the main theme

#### URL

15. Sep 2022
16. thevoroscope.com thevoroscope.com

#### URL

17. thevoroscope.com thevoroscope.com

#### URL

18. github.com github.com
1. As a workaround you can recompile the client locally. I've just tried it and it's working just fine on Ubuntu 22.04 Clone the repo: git clone git@github.com:Jigsaw-Code/outline-client.git cd outline-client Install node 16 (for example using brew) brew install node@16 Install all dependencies npm install Build the app npm run action electron/build linux Now you have properly working Outline-Client.AppImage and you can run it ./build/dist/Outline-Client.AppImage

Describes how to build electron app AppImage from source.

#### URL

19. Aug 2022
20. Local file Local file
1. While Heyde outlines using keywords/subject headings and dates on the bottom of cards with multiple copies using carbon paper, we're left with the question of where Luhmann pulled his particular non-topical ordering as well as his numbering scheme.

While it's highly likely that Luhmann would have been familiar with the German practice of Aktenzeichen ("file numbers") and may have gotten some interesting ideas about organization from the closing sections of the "Die Kartei" section 1.2 of the book, which discusses library organization and the Dewey Decimal system, we're still left with the bigger question of organization.

It's obvious that Luhmann didn't follow the heavy use of subject headings nor the advice about multiple copies of cards in various portions of an alphabetical index.

While the Dewey Decimal System set up described is indicative of some of the numbering practices, it doesn't get us the entirety of his numbering system and practice.

One need only take a look at the Inhalt (table of contents) of Heyde's book! The outline portion of the contents displays a very traditional branching tree structure of ideas. Further, the outline is very specifically and similarly numbered to that of Luhmann's zettelkasten. This structure and numbering system is highly suggestive of branching ideas where each branch builds on the ideas immediately above it or on the ideas at the next section above that level.

Just as one can add an infinite number of books into the Dewey Decimal system in a way that similar ideas are relatively close together to provide serendipity for both search and idea development, one can continue adding ideas to this branching structure so they're near their colleagues.

Thus it's highly possible that the confluence of descriptions with the book and the outline of the table of contents itself suggested a better method of note keeping to Luhmann. Doing this solves the issue of needing to create multiple copies of note cards as well as trying to find cards in various places throughout the overall collection, not to mention slimming down the collection immensely. Searching for and finding a place to put new cards ensures not only that one places one's ideas into a growing logical structure, but it also ensures that one doesn't duplicate information that may already exist within one's over-arching outline. From an indexing perspective, it also solves the problem of cross referencing information along the axes of the source author, source title, and a large variety of potential subject headings.

And of course if we add even a soupcon of domain expertise in systems theory to the mix...

While thinking about Aktenzeichen, keep in mind that it was used in German public administration since at least 1934, only a few years following Heyde's first edition, but would have been more heavily used by the late 1940's when Luhmann would have begun his law studies.

https://hypothes.is/a/CqGhGvchEey6heekrEJ9WA

When thinking about taking notes for creating output, one can follow one thought with another logically both within one's card index not only to write an actual paper, but the collection and development happens the same way one is filling in an invisible outline which builds itself over time.

Linking different ideas to other ideas separate from one chain of thought also provides the ability to create multiple of these invisible, but organically growing outlines.

#### Annotators

21. Jul 2022
22. archive.org archive.org
1. https://archive.org/details/britannica_propaedia/mode/2up

The one-volume Propædia is the first of three parts of the 15th edition of Encyclopædia Britannica, the other two being the 12-volume Micropædia and the 17-volume Macropædia. The Propædia is intended as a topical organization of the Britannica's contents, complementary to the alphabetical organization of the other two parts. Introduced in 1974 with the 15th edition, the Propædia and Micropædia were intended to replace the Index of the 14th edition; however, after widespread criticism, the Britannica restored the Index as a two-volume set in 1985. ==The core of the Propædia is its Outline of Knowledge, which seeks to provide a logical framework for all human knowledge==; however, the Propædia also has several appendices listing the staff members, advisors and contributors to all three parts of the Britannica.

#### URL

23. www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
1. Because I wanted to make use of a unified version of the overall universe of knowledge as a structural framework, I ended up using the Outline of Knowledge (OoK) in the Propædia volume that was part of Encyclopedia Britannica 15th edition, first published 1974, the final version of which (2010) is archived at -- where else? -- the Internet Archive.

The Outline of Knowledge appears in the Propædia volume of the Encyclopedia Britannica. It is similar to various olther classification systems like the Dewey Decimal system or the Universal Decimal Classification.

#### URL

24. Oct 2021
1. “Canada is not an accident or a work in progress or a thought experiment. I mean that Canada is a scam — a pyramid scheme, a ruse, a heist. Canada is a front. And it’s a front for a massive network of resource extraction companies, oil barons, and mining magnates.”

“Canada is not an accident or a work in progress or a thought experiment. I mean that Canada is a scam — a pyramid scheme, a ruse, a heist. Canada is a front. And it’s a front for a massive network of resource extraction companies, oil barons, and mining magnates.”

“Eventually they spread their land grab all the way to the Pacific Ocean and the northern coastlines in pursuit of gold, silver, iron, copper, nickel, and diamond reserves.… ‘Canada’ came about in the late 1800s for nakedly economic reasons…”

#### URL

26. Aug 2021
27. metamaps.cc metamaps.cc

#### URL

28. opensym.org opensym.org
1. Free/Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) FLOSS development communities, including both software engineering aspects and human factors FLOSS development processes, such as code reviews, joining process, etc. Best practices and case studies of open collaboration with FLOSS FLOSS collaboration beyond software (e.g. FLOSS collaboration for open data/content, open standards, open hardware, etc.) Wikipedia and Wikimedia Research Participation in Wikimedia communities Group Dynamics and Organization in Wikipedia and related projects Readership/Engagement on Wikipedia and related projects Technical Infrastructure and Design in Wikimedia projects Evaluating Content of Wikimedia projects Knowledge Diffusion, Outreach, and Generalization Open Collaboration Research, esp. Wikis and Social Media Novel open collaboration technologies ranging from entirely new socio-technical systems to MediaWiki extensions Wikis in corporations, academia, non-profits, and other organizations Online collaboration using social media technologies (e.g., Wikis, Blogs, Twitter)Theoretical work on open collaboration Digital divides and open collaboration technologies Open Data and Open Science Open data quality, standards, measures and metrics Open data and open science methods, applications and prototypes Best practices and case studies for Open Data and Open Science Repositories, networks and working platforms for open scientific communication, collaboration, exchange and access to open knowledge Open Education Tools and methods for managing, storing and sharing of Open Educational Resources (OER) Open online learning environments such as MOOCs Enabling individual learning paths Connecting formal and informal learning Supporting self-paced learning and co-construction of knowledge Development of new knowledge or products (e.g. Maker Spaces), collecting data (e.g. Citizen Science) or discussing political topics (e.g. e-participation). Open Innovation Architecture and design of open innovation systems The role of IT-artefacts in open and collaborative innovation activities Implementation of open innovation platforms in corporate IT landscapes IT security, intellectual property and personal anonymity in open innovationç Best practices and case studies of open data, open standards, open source for open innovation Open innovation and GLAM Open Policy/Open Government Open policy formulation and design Implications of open policies for governments Implementation of open policies Measuring the success and impact of open policies Best practices and cases studies of open policy/government Openness in various public initiatives (e.g. Smart Cities, Internet of Things) Open Standards Communities for development, maintenance, use, and implementation of open standards Implications of open standards for governments and other organizations Open standards development processes Open standards and licensing aspects

#### URL

29. Mar 2021
30. en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
1. Mathematically, a hierarchical taxonomy is a tree structure of classifications for a given set of objects.

#### URL

31. en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
1. Title: "goal the use case is trying to satisfy"[23]:101 Main Success Scenario: numbered list of steps[23]:101 Step: "a simple statement of the interaction between the actor and a system"[23]:101 Extensions: separately numbered lists, one per Extension[23]:101 Extension: "a condition that results in different interactions from .. the main success scenario". An extension from main step 3 is numbered 3a, etc.

Not sure why I find this example so interesting.

Probably because it is a human-readable outline that uses machine-readable (programming language source code) constructs, namely loops/iteration.

The format in which this is written in, then, is itself a kind of (high-level, human-oriented) programming language.

Example:

• numbered list of steps [introduces/names the loop/iterator/enumeration being done]
• Step: "a simple statement of the interaction between the actor and a system" [defines the inner part of the loop that gets "executed" once per iteration]

#### URL

32. Feb 2021
33. en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

#### URL

34. Jan 2021
35. www.napoleoncities.eu www.napoleoncities.eu
1. A égale distance des côtes nord

pour essai le 100121

2. A égale distance des côtes nord et sud de la Bretagne

Article à revoir

#### URL

36. Oct 2020
37. www.julian.com www.julian.com
1. Step 2 — Outline your talking pointsBy this point, you’ve generated intriguing talking points to support your argument and explore its significance. But your points are buried in a messy brainstorm.Now, extract the points that most intrigue you. Then, order them into a loose outline.

#### URL

38. Oct 2019
39. outline.com outline.com
1. bottom sheet 功能展示

Outline 基本能保留我派文章的大部分样式，目前还转换不过来的我发现只有分割线和脚注。

#### URL

40. Mar 2018
41. inside.tru.ca inside.tru.ca
1. Las aplicaciones aumentan el acceso a la justicia

#### URL

42. Nov 2017
43. english121.commons.gc.cuny.edu english121.commons.gc.cuny.edu
1. What is literacy? How am I supposed to learn from children’s literature?

I'd like to use Adichie's The Dangers of A Single Story to start the first day of this course alongside a "Radical Honesty Statement" to illustrate the way we'll be using LITERACY to investigate our own relationship to writing and reading.