Nate Angell
You might also want to visit my blog post, where I introduce the publication of this paper alongside some additional ideas on interventions to prevent AI mirages, on AI mirages vs AI rainbows, and on how AI terminology plays out in different disciplines.
for - search - Brave - reagan abolishes media fairness doctrine law - https://www.google.com/search?q=reagan+abolishes+media+fairness+doctrine+law&sca_esv=2e69544fa688a049&biw=1920&bih=951&sxsrf=AHTn8zo1I0-wVztwUUFJ4gP-uEqySL3T_A%3A1739512294133&ei=5tmuZ5vuB-WJhbIP0N7K2AI&ved=0ahUKEwib-f6ivMKLAxXlREEAHVCvEisQ4dUDCBI&uact=5&oq=reagan+abolishes+media+fairness+doctrine+law&gs_lp=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&sclient=gws-wiz-serp - from - Youtube - Luke Beasley - SHOCK: Trump Voter LOSING EVERYTHING Because of Trump, Posts THIS! - 2025, Feb 145
interesting results returned - The Ghost of the F.C.C. Fairness Doctrine in the " by Ian Klein The FCC Fairness Doctrine required that all major broadcasting outlets spend equal time covering both sides of all controversial issues of national importance. The Fairness Doctrine remained the standard for decades before it stopped being enforced during the Reagan administration, and was - https://hyp.is/TWb98uqdEe-6KbN9-DbjWw/repository.uclawsf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1809&context=hastings_comm_ent_law_journal
Wonderful article by the philosopher Jared Henderson, who I regularly watch on YouTube.
Keep Comments Open! by Dan Allosso
Some thoughts about the ability to turn off public comments on Substack posts, which may diminish the conversation.
https://www.zylstra.org/blog/2022/08/added-hypothes-is-annotations-link-to-posts/
Also... just to show the functionality. (aka: First!)
annotations of "10 Thoughts After 100 Annotations in Hypothes.is"
I love that you've got a comments heading for Hypothes.is annotations on your post @tonz! This is awesome.
You can use click on the < button in the top-right of your browser window to read and write comments on this post with Hypothesis. You can read more about how I use this software here.
Spencer's example of user interface below his posts to indicate how readers might comment on his website.
Social annotation at it's deepest and finest!
I regularly check in on comments for this website and will generally respond!
@spgreenhalgh, Are you checking for comments manually only?
I've seen a few doing this pattern before:<br /> - https://boffosocko.com/2021/03/25/hypothes-is-as-a-comment-system-receiving-mentions-and-notifications-for-your-website/<br /> - https://boffosocko.com/2020/05/26/55771462/
I use an RSS feed through IFTTT to trigger email notifications to help out and @judell's facet tool can be useful: https://jonudell.info/h/facet/?max=10000&exactTagSearch=true&expanded=true&addQuoteContext=true&wildcard_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fspencergreenhalgh.com%2F*
Although Hugo works with a number of commenting systems, I’ve chosen to use the social annotation software Hypothesis as the social layer on this website.
https://spencergreenhalgh.com/hypothesis/
Someone else using Hypothes.is as a commenting system in the wild.
One of the things I do a lot on Twitter, for example, is retweet stories that I find interesting in order to come back to them later.
retweeting as a bookmarking behavior
https://notiz.blog/2022/04/27/custom-post-type-comment/
https://blog.flickr.net/en/2022/03/17/flickr-forever-2022/
Flickr is creating space for restricted and moderate content. Free users can only have 50 non-public photos.
pratik This may be too late to be a Micro Camp topic but does anyone knows if any UX research exists on the ideal post length for a timeline view? Twitter has 280 chars (a remnant from SMS). I think FB truncates after 400 chars. But academic abstracts are 150-300 words (not chars).
@pratik Mastodon caps at 500 as a default. The information density of the particular language/character set is certainly part of the calculus.
Here's a few to start (and see their related references): - https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/How-Constraints-Affect-Content%3A-The-Case-of-Switch-Gligoric-Anderson/de77e2b6abae20a728d472744557d722499efef5 - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-019-0280-3
https://github.com/tegon/traktflix
Code for making a Trakt.tv scrobbler for Netflix.
Similar to the idea of {{ if .Title }}, does Micro.blog (or Hugo) have a way to identify if a post only contains images and capture that to a variable?
Another potential method (or an additional filter) for finding posts with photos, or more specifically posts whose main purpose is a photo or image is to use use the post type discovery algorithm. Given that Micro.blog is built on a variety of IndieWeb building blocks, most photos could/should have a class of u-photo on their img tags, so you could search for these instead or in addition to. I believe there are a set of parsers and tools out there that do this in a few languages already and someone in the IndieWeb Dev chat can direct you to them if they’re not linked to the page above.
https://collect.readwriterespond.com/antennapod/
I feel your pain here Aaron.
Perhaps it helps, perhaps not, but I've been using AntennaPod for a few years now. In particular I love it on Android because I can use the share functionality to share to a custom email address which posts to reading.am for an account that aggregates everything I'm listening to. Then I port the RSS feed of that back into my site. It's a stupid amount of manual work, but it mostly works.
Alternately you could share material you listen to to Huffduffer and pull data out that way as well. My problem here is that Huffduffer is more of a bookmark service than a "listened to this" sort of service, though you could always add a "listened" tag to the things you've heard in the past.
The tougher part of all this is that podcasts have "canonical" links for the podcast episodes (sometimes) and an entirely different link for the audio file which has no meta data attached to it (presuming you can even find the URL for the audio file to begin with.)
AntennaPod allows you to pick and choose what you want to share, so usually I default to the audio file to get that in to the workflow and finding/adding the data for the particular episode is a bit easier.
I will say that this is one of the ugliest and most labor intensive workflows I've got for social posts, so I'm usually only doing it and posting publicly for things that I really think are worth the time that make for interesting notes/observations that go along with the post.
I'm curious to see what others come up with for this workflow.
https://jamesg.blog/2021/09/13/new-social-pages
Some awesome looking progress here.
Years ago, I helped build a storytelling platform called Hi (a simplification of its original name: Hitotoki, now shuttered and archived) and one of the things I’m most proud of our team having concocted is the commenting system. We had tens of thousands of users and almost no issues with harassment. You could comment on anyone’s story and your having commented would be public — a little avatar at the bottom of the page — but the comment itself would be private. This allowed folks to reap the public validation of engagement (“Whoa! So many comments!”) while simultaneously removing any grandstanding or attacks. It wasn’t quite messaging. It wasn’t quite commenting. It felt very much like a contemporary, lighter take on email, and in being so was a joy to use. Here’s what the bottom of an entry looks like: "Commenting" on Hitotoki
I like the design and set up for this feature. Perhaps something for the IndieWeb to pick up? In some sense the implementation of Webmention-based likes, bookmarks, and facepiled mentions on my site is just this sort of design.
The anecdotal evidence that there was little harassment is a positive sign for creating such a thing.
For @mentions on one's own website the feed https://hypothes.is/stream.rss?wildcard_uri=https://example.com/*
should work for folks using Hypothes.is as a commenting system on their website.
To cover other cases when people don't use the @ symbol, one might also subscribe to
https://hypothes.is/stream.rss?any=%22username%22
Liked the post? Click the beard a few times.
This is a clever and fun UI for implementing likes that seems on-brand for the website owner.
Dispo is an invite-only social photo app with a twist: you can’t see any photos you take with the app until 24 hours after you take them. (The app sends you a push notification to open them every day at 9AM local time: among other things, a nice hack to boost daily usage.) Founded by David Dobrik, one of the world’s most popular YouTubers, Dispo has been around as a basic utility for a year.
This is the first reference to Dispo I've come across.
These new paid communities largely live on invite-only Telegrams, Slacks, Discords, and Facebook groups, raising the question: could there be applications more suitable to these networks? Indeed, the growing popularity of paid communities has been noticed by a bunch of new venture-funded companies such as such as Genevachat, Mighty Networks, and Circle, all of which want to become “the platform for communities.”
Platforms specifically for communities could be an interesting new object on the Internet. What sorts of IndieWeb building blocks would one use to build them? Are there new functionalities that they might have that aren't in the list of building blocks yet?
I could see functionality like signing in with one's website using IndieAuth to access private content being a piece.
This seems like a cool potential way of doing all sorts of things in the IndieWeb space for WordPress. I'm curious what it looks like from other perspectives. I'll have to think this through a bit...
This is exactly the sort of thing that makes me happy about the IndieWeb!
One person tinkers around with an idea and posts about how they did it. Someone else sees it and thinks it's cool and wants it for themselves. They then modify it for their system, maybe with some changes or even improvements, and post the details on their site.
They've both syndicated copies to IndieWeb news or to the IndieWeb wiki, so that in the future, others looking for that sort of UI research or examples can find them and potentially modify them for their own personal use.
And the cycle begins anew...
When I think about it, likes and bookmarks are somewhat difficult to distinguish for my purpose. A bookmark inherently implies that I liked a post because I usually only bookmark posts on Pocket that I like and want to save for later. I use Firefox bookmarks to track the articles that I have not yet read and want to come back to later. There is a distinction. A like is clearer. It’s my way of saying that I did like your content. Not everybody will know my policy on bookmarks, so having a like feature is useful.
My general heirarchy is that bookmarks are things I want to come back to (and usually read) later, reads are things that I've read, like are things I've read and want to send appreciation for, and replies are things that usually are both read, liked, and needed even a bit more.
Here's more on how I've thought about it before: https://boffosocko.com/2018/03/10/thoughts-on-linkblogs-bookmarks-reads-likes-favorites-follows-and-related-links/
I just wrote a long, considered, friendly, and I hope helpful comment here but -- sorry, I have to see the irony in this once again -- your system wouldn't let me say anything longer tahn 1,500 characters. If you want more intelligent conversations, you might want to expand past soundbite.
In 2008, even before Twitter had become a thing at 180 characters, here's a great reason that people should be posting their commentary on their own blogs.
This example from 2008 is particularly rich as you'll find examples on this page of Derek Powazek and Jeff Jarvis posting comments with links to much richer content and commentary on their own websites.
We're a decade+ on and we still haven't managed to improve on this problem. In fact, we may have actually made it worse.
I'd love to see On the Media revisit this idea. (Of course their site doesn't have comments at all anymore either.)
But note well, my friend, that all of these people are speaking to you with intelligence, experience, generosity, and civility. You know what’s missing? Two things: First, the sort of nasty comments your own piece decries. And second: You.
Important!
Why can't there be more sites with solid commentary like this anymore? Do the existence of Twitter and Facebook mean whe can't have nice things anymore?
Comments are enabled via Hypothes.is
This may be the first time I've seen someone explicitly use Hypothes.is as the comment system on their personal website.
I wonder if Matthew actively monitors commentary on his site, and, if so, how he's accomplishing it?
The method I've used in the past as a quick and dirty method is Jon Udell's facet tool https://jonudell.info/h/facet/?wildcard_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fmatthewlincoln.net%2F*&max=100, though it only indicates just a few comments so far.
Use cases like this are another good reason why Hypothes.is ought to support the Webmention spec.
The shortest explanation of Wikity I can provide is this: Wikity is social bookmarks, wikified.
It’s a self-hosted bookmark manager for linked ideas and data that has (for me) revolutionized my ability to think through issues and find connections between ideas I would have otherwise missed.
quote tweets
defined pretty well here: https://indieweb.org/quote_tweet
Another feature that has been requested almost since the start, and which I keep rejecting is quoting messages.
This week, host Bob Garfield did a piece ostensibly about the problems newspaper sites have with website comments. Unfortunately it just came out sounding like another old journalist kvetching about how everyone on the net is an idiot. You can listen to the story here.
Here's the new link to the audio: https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/otm/episodes/131068-july-25-2008
Here's the link to a version of the site in August 2008 with the commentary, which makes a fascinating rabbit hole to go down: https://web.archive.org/web/20080907233914/http://www.onthemedia.org/episodes/2008/07/25/segments/104537
What if you could use AI to control the content in your feed? Dialing up or down whatever is most useful to you. If I’m on a budget, maybe I don’t want to see photos of friends on extravagant vacations. Or, if I’m trying to pay more attention to my health, encourage me with lots of salads and exercise photos. If I recently broke up with somebody, happy couple photos probably aren’t going to help in the healing process. Why can’t I have control over it all, without having to unfollow anyone. Or, opening endless accounts to separate feeds by topic. And if I want to risk seeing everything, or spend a week replacing my usual feed with images from a different culture, country, or belief system, couldn’t I do that, too?
Some great blue sky ideas here.
Another good time to slow people down is when they’re about to post something nasty online. Friction-positive design can help here, too. Civil Comments was an app you could apply to your comments section that forced commenters to rate three other comments before posting their own.
Trisha Prabhu was fourteen years old when she was named a Google Science Fair Global Finalist for her ReThink plat-form, which, according to research she presented at the event, reduced teen hate-posting by 93 percent! How did she do it? Very simple. Let’s say you’re on a social media platform using the ReThink technology. You’re about to post a hateful mes-sage. ReThink catches it; when you hit “send,” a screen pops up that says:ReThink has detected that this message may be hurtful to others. Are you sure you want to post this message?93 percent of adolescents who saw that intervention didn’t post.
This is the classic cold start problem of social. The answer to the traditional chicken-and-egg question is actually answerable: what comes first is a single chicken, and then another chicken, and then another chicken, and so on. The harder version of the question is why the first chicken came and stayed when no other chickens were around, and why the others followed.
This gives me a hypothesis about why the chicken post came first within the IndieWeb.
The comments on this piece are interesting and illuminating, particularly all these years later.
It’s simply better to link directly to your related content in a meaningful context, than to use a generic related posts box somewhere else on your page.
Likes, upvotes, replies, friending. What if it’s all just linking? In fact, what if linking is actually more meaningful!
This is sort of the fun, I think, in maintaining things like listen and read posts on my site. While they're a useful archive for me, in some part I hope they might speed some discovery for folks who find them or search them by category/tag as well.
I could post somewhere, "Hey I listen to this podcast," or retweet a headline, but invariably in the morass of content out there, there isn't actually an indication that I invested my finite amount of time actually listening to or reading that thing. Perhaps I was just doing some social signaling to make myself seem more interesting or worldly? To me this is a lot of the value of these types of posts.