- Mar 2022
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
ReconfigBehSci on Twitter: ‘@alexdefig are you really going to claim that responses to the introduction of passports on uptake across 4 other countries are evidentially entirely irrelevant to whether or not passports are justified or not?’ / Twitter. (n.d.). Retrieved 31 March 2022, from https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1444358068280565764
-
- Feb 2022
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Deepti Gurdasani. (2022, January 30). Have tried to now visually illustrate an earlier thread I wrote about why prevalence estimates based on comparisons of “any symptom” between infected cases, and matched controls will yield underestimates for long COVID. I’ve done a toy example below here, to show this 🧵 [Tweet]. @dgurdasani1. https://twitter.com/dgurdasani1/status/1487578265187405828
-
- Oct 2021
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
@lakens: I’m interested to hear which COVID studies by psychologists you think have had a measurable positive effect on the world. E.g.… [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/lakens/status/1427856489990004741?s=20
-
- May 2021
-
www.mcgill.ca www.mcgill.ca
-
Epidemiology 101 for Journalists. (n.d.). Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health. Retrieved 23 February 2021, from https://www.mcgill.ca/epi-biostat-occh/epidemiology-101-journalists
-
- Apr 2021
-
royalsociety.org royalsociety.org
-
“Long Covid: An Unfolding Story | Royal Society.” Accessed April 30, 2021. https://royalsociety.org/science-events-and-lectures/2021/04/long-covid/.
-
- Mar 2021
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Cailin O’Connor. (2020, November 10). Using agent-based methods we show how even modest contact between disciplines can allow better methods to spread. This is because outsiders can award academic credit to those using good methods, leading to their uptake. 5 [Tweet]. @cailinmeister. https://twitter.com/cailinmeister/status/1326229762533060608
-
- Sep 2020
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
Susan Athey, July 22, 2020. (2020, August 2). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqTOPrUxDzM
-
- Aug 2020
-
troyerstling.com troyerstling.com
-
“In 2004, Cleveland Clinic physiologist Guang Yue wanted to know if merely thinking about lifting weights was enough to increase strength. Study subjects were divided into four groups. One group tried to strengthen their finger muscles with physical exercise; one tried to strengthen their finger muscles by only visualizing the exercise; another tried to increase arm strength through visualization; while the last group did nothing at all. The trial lasted twelve weeks.When it was over, those who did nothing saw no gains. The group that relied on physical training saw the greatest increase in strength-at 53 percent. But it’s the mental groups where things got curious. Folks who did no physical training but merely imagined their fingers going through precise exercise motions saw a 35 percent increase in strength, while the ones who visualized arm exercises saw a 13.5 percent increase in strength.”Let’s review — these participants did NOTHING BUT VISUALIZING and saw an increase of up to 35% in strength!But things are all the more convincing when you consider that a few years before Yue’s studies, neuroscientists found no difference between performing an action and merely imagining oneself performing that action-the same neuronal circuits fire in either case.
Experiments have shown that simply visualizing an can have great impacts.
-
- Jul 2020
-
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com
-
Eisen, M. B., & Tibshirani, R. (2020, July 20). Opinion | How to Identify Flawed Research Before It Becomes Dangerous. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/20/opinion/coronavirus-preprints.html
-
-
www.sciencedirect.com www.sciencedirect.com
-
Clark, J., Glasziou, P., Mar, C. D., Bannach-Brown, A., Stehlik, P., & Scott, A. M. (2020). A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: A case study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 121, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.008
-
- Jun 2020
-
blogs.lse.ac.uk blogs.lse.ac.uk
-
Carrying out qualitative research under lockdown – Practical and ethical considerations. (2020, April 20). Impact of Social Sciences. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2020/04/20/carrying-out-qualitative-research-under-lockdown-practical-and-ethical-considerations/
Tags
- scientific practice
- is:blog
- COVID-19
- technique
- data collection
- ethics
- pandemic
- qualitative research
- lang:en
- study design
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
-
r/BehSciMeta—Comment by u/UHahn on ”What is the impact of retraction of scientific studies reported in news media?”. (n.d.). Reddit. Retrieved June 17, 2020, from https://www.reddit.com/r/BehSciMeta/comments/gyw43b/what_is_the_impact_of_retraction_of_scientific/ftp5w1p
-
-
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com
-
Zimmer, C. (2020, June 1). How You Should Read Coronavirus Studies, or Any Science Paper. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/article/how-to-read-a-science-study-coronavirus.html
-