1,395 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2017
    1. educators need to develop a comprehensive educational program that would include teaching students how to live in a world marked by multiple overlapping modes of literacy extending from print to visual culture and screen cultures

      Point 3/6

    2. Education is never innocent: It is always implicated in relations of power and specific visions of the present and future.

      This is what the right recognizes and fights for. Meanwhile the left is still caught up in the idea of neutral, objective education.

    3. create those public spaces for students to address how knowledge is related to the power of both self-definition and social agency. In part, this suggests providing students with the skills, ideas, values and authority necessary for them not only to be well-informed and knowledgeable across a number of traditions and disciplines, but also to be able to invest in the reality of a substantive democracy

      The role of education.

    4. Examples of such violence can be seen in the forms of an audit culture and empirically-driven teaching that dominates higher education. These educational projects amount to pedagogies of repression and serve primarily to numb the mind and produce what might be called dead zones of the imagination. These are pedagogies that are largely disciplinary and have little regard for contexts, history, making knowledge meaningful, or expanding what it means for students to be critically engaged agents.

      On audit culture in education. How do personalized/adaptive/competency-based learning and learning analytics support it?

    5. viewing public and higher education as democratic public spheres necessitates rejecting the notion that they should be reduced to sites for training students for the workforce

      Education is not just workforce training.

    6. Far more than a teaching method, education is a moral and political practice actively involved not only in the production of knowledge, skills and values but also in the construction of identities, modes of identification, and forms of individual and social agency.

      As in OKP's literacies, skills, identities, communities. Should values and agency be included in this list or are they the products of these other focuses?

    7. In the present moment, it becomes particularly important for educators and concerned citizens all over the world to protect and enlarge the critical formative educational cultures and public spheres that make democracy possible.

      public education supporting democracy

    1. What is the objective, what is the definition of success, as academia and its libraries engage in issues of scholarly communication? Answering this question crisply and with a clear sense of priority may allow libraries to evaluate their investments, and to organize, staff, and run their operations, with greater focus.

      Roger calls for clear scholcomm strategy.

    1. Influencing unfolding realities may be less about electing different leaders and policies than about learning how to change ourselves

      Change centered in the individual/human rather than the social/political. Wondering if this is too tethered by the USA's very unfortunate tendency to recast all wider social movements as self-improvement (eg, Buddhism, environmentalism > self-health, etc).

    2. The commons has also provided a language and ethic for thinking and acting like a commoner—collaborative, socially minded, embedded in nature, concerned with stewardship and long-term, respectful of the pluriverse that makes up our planet.

      Thinking like a commoner.

    3. Cultural critic Douglas Rushkoff has said, “I’ve given up on fixing the economy.  The economy is not broken.  It’s simply unjust.”

      Strong words from Douglas Rushkoff: "The economy is not broken. It's simply unjust."

    4. Even social democrats and liberals, the traditional foes of free-market dogma, seem locked into an archaic worldview and set of political strategies that makes their advocacy sound tinny. Their familiar progress-narrative—that economic growth, augmented by government interventions and redistribution, can in fact work and make society more stable and fair—is no longer persuasive.

      How progressive narratives are no longer satisfying.

    1. Through teaching Open, can we model the value of knowledge as commons in a way that shifts our thinking and practices towards the sharing and maintenance of all commons such as water, forests, soil, air and seeds?

      knowledge stewardship as an environmental practice

    2. He writes “The commons, briefly put, is about self-organized social systems for managing shared wealth.”

      Self-organized yes, but I argue that the right place to locate that self-organization and practice at this historical moment is within public institutions, which are in tension with Bollier's idea of the commons as beyond the State.

    3. All the OER, open pedagogy, open practices, teaching, learning, critical digital pedagogy, diversity, inclusion, etc. discussions all come back to this.

      I think especially in our given time now, both open practices and their location in public institutions is critically necessary.

    4. Or maybe it’s how we are defining ‘citizen’ these days. Has that word been co-opted to mean “worker”?

      Yes! There's such a strong narrative that the primary purpose of education is to prepare workers, often located in the interests of the students, as if they only have one-dimensional motivations to learn. Meanwhile, even employers call for richer education, as in their participation in AAC&U's Liberal Education and America’s Promise (LEAP) — which Hrabowski is a part of.

    1. problems of diffuse authority

      I assume Mike is connecting this to his thinking about how we need effective news filters in order to shoulder a large part of the responsibility for factchecking because we all don't usually have the time or the expertise.

    1. six interrelated competencies: mastering rigorous academic content, learning how to think critically and solve problems, working collaboratively, communicating effectively, directing one’s own learning, and developing an academic mindset

      deeper learning competencies

    1. Knowledge consumption and knowledge creation are not separate but parallel processes, as knowledge is co-constructed, contextualized, cumulative, iterative, and recursive.

      @clhendricksbc (above) is right that this is a key point. It brings out the Foucault in me, the way that discourse is a social process lodged in relationships of power. Maybe some of open's effect is to re/unbalance existing power relationships in the consumption and creation of knowledge.

    2. We hope that this chapter will inspire those of us in education to focus our critical and aspirational lenses on larger questions about the ideology embedded within our educational systems and the ways in which pedagogy impacts these systems. At the same time we hope to provide some tools and techniques to those who want to build a more empowering, collaborative, and just architecture for learning.

      I might reverse the priority of these: for me, OEP is first a worthy learning practice, and second a practice that can question and evolve ideology. Does the latter grow out of the former?

    1. So I’ll go ahead and say I see open as an end product less interesting. Open as a space that can produce open products: I find much more interesting.

      This is an absolutely critical distinction. The open education community's focus on OER has emphasized product-focused practices, when we should be focused on practices that are enabled by or produce open products as a byproduct of our interaction.

    1. Sixty-three percent of instructors said that developing a course with OER takes at least one and a half times as much time as a traditional course.

      63% instructors say developing OER course took 1.5x a traditional course. < This doesn't seem that high, given that a traditional course presumably uses an existing textbook or course materials. Is the level of effort less the second time the course is taught?

    2. Launching OER Degree Pathways: An Early Snapshot of Achieving the Dream’s OER Degree Initiative and Emerging Lessons

      This is an early formal report on the findings of the ATD OER Degree program. I'm annotating as a part of the Open Education 2017 conference in Anaheim, where this snapshot was presented by Richard Sebastian and Rebecca Griffiths, and invite others to do the same. Im suing the opened17 tag, along with at tag related to this particular presentation there: opened17BXfW

    1. OER-Enabled Pedagogy is the set of teaching and learning practices only practical in the context of the 5R permissions characteristic of open educational resources. Some people – but not all – use the terms “open pedagogy” or “open educational practices” synonymously.

      OER-enabled pedagogy is the OEG's preferred name for what other's might call "open pedagogy" or "open educational practices". David Wiley blogs about this specific naming.

  2. Sep 2017
    1. Jessica had never used a computer and was surprised to learn that technology is more than just a tool for the young men in her community to promote illicit pictures.

      perception of tech as something for male pleasure

    2. governments are a key means of safeguarding ‘public good’ concerns in the face of increased for-profit provision of online education

      why govt in digital ed?

    3. the Rapporteur stressed the need for robust government oversight of education and technology policy-making, particularly in terms of ensuring that digitally innovative forms of education provision do not lead to socially restrictive outcomes.

      why govt in digital ed?

    4. Having reached a point where the ability to make meaningful use of digital technology determines, to a significant extent, an individual’s ability to participate in modern societies and economies, then the need for action and intervention is obvious.

      digital skills = success in contemporary society/economy

    5. Members of the Broadband Commission Working Group on Education RECOMMEND that the Commission

      The commission should:

      1. Facilitate info exchange
      2. Establish international frameworks
      3. Measure digital skills levels
    6. Some of the most relevant ‘digital skills’ likely to arise from these developments may not involve the direct use of digital technology.

      "Instead, they will relate to people’s awareness and understandings of digital technologies that they do not necessarily touch and control but which nevertheless influence their lives in profound ways."

    7. Pronounced inequalities and disparities exist in terms of individuals’ digital skills and competencies within communities, countries and regions.

      Foundations to address:

      1. Institutional capacity and continuity
      2. GOV involvement
      3. Public/private partnerships managed via nonprofit/neutral bodies
      4. Localization/contextualization
      5. Scaling existing promising practices
      6. Using existing technologies
      7. Blending non-digital approaches
      8. Bridge formal/informal skills provision
      9. Teacher PD
      10. Evaluation/evidence
    8. Foster ‘soft’ and ‘complementary’ digital skills: Incorporation of ‘twenty-first century skills’ into national curricula; development and promotion of practical programmes that aim to inform and safeguard digital safety; implications of online activities; development of digital literacy and citizenship; knowledge of digital rights; and awareness of how digital technology, big data and algorithms shape society.

      soft/complementary digital skills

    9. The term ‘digital skills’ refers to a range of different abilities, many of which are not only ‘skills’ per se, but a combination of behaviours, expertise, know-how, work habits, character traits, dispositions and critical understandings.

      digital skills as constellations of capabilities

    1. A commercial/proprietary vendor borrows funding, setting that borrowed funding against potential future revenue; an open-source community pools present capacity to create a sustainable future.

      The roadmap differences between proprietary and open/community source.

    2. Socio-economic factors are therefore potentially of particular significance to the NGDLE conversation, but are all too often not adequately represented or are reduced to a simplistic (and unsustainable, unless an infinitely expandable market is assumed) model of counting new LMS adoptions.

      socio-economic factors in LMS adoption

    3. we simply had far less experience in component-based architectures and open application programming interfaces (APIs) that allow the interconnection and communication of systems and components

      technical reasons for NGDLE failure

    4. At an institutional level, the lack of a clearly articulated transition path from the LMS to a potentially more flexible, component-based successor was undoubtedly a significant factor.

      Institutional reason for NGDLE failure.

  3. futurepress.github.io futurepress.github.io
    1. There was a fishy flavor to the milk, too, which I could not at all account for, till one morning happening to take a stroll along the beach among some fishermen’s boats, I saw Hosea’s brindled cow feeding on fish remnants, and marching along the sand with each foot in a cod’s decapitated head, looking very slip-shod, I assure ye.

      Why the milk tastes fishy: the cows eat fish.

    1. What if they failed because there aren’t just one or two factors that account for the difference that human tutors make?

      yes: "tutoring" is too often seen as a black box that returns a sigma of educational improvement, but how?

    Tags

    Annotators

  4. Aug 2017
  5. Jul 2017
    1. he wishes Lacuna could be updated more easily. Texts must be submitted to the tech team for uploading, which can take a few days, and once his grant funded fellowship ended, he had to upload documents on his own, he said.

      Major difference with Hypothesis. Enabling annotation only in a specialized content repository drastically limits the utility of annotation.

    1. Social Media Is The New Smoking

      While I understand why people might have experiences that would lead them to hold the views in this post, these views generalize such experience to describe all social media use. Many people have profoundly valuable and deep social connections on social media, and still also have valuable FTF social connections. Like any broad human activity, social media use is more complex than imagined here. Even smoking itself can't always be seen as all bad, see this account of how smoking breaks can be seen supporting worker rights and social connection.

    1. those who are making a killing off cigarettes and anti-smoking campaigns alike

      Someone is making a killing off anti-smoking campaigns? Even if that is sorta true, I can't imagine that the amount of money involved is more than a tiny percentage of the money generated by the tobacco industry.

    1. The word ecosystem, borrowed from its ecological and biological roots, here refers to the educational technology (edtech) market.

      Doesn't seem to include opensource and/or homegrown in the edtech ecosystem.

    1. It's hard to imagine instructors both constructing a new mash-up environment and crafting improved learning activities.

      Yes, and it's hard to imagine colleges and universities dedicating teams of people to help make this vision possible either in an era of dwindling resources.

    1. Now is the time to start our journey.

      It would be interesting to reconceive this entire project without the N\(2\)GDLE machine at the center. As it's mostly NOT a technology project, perhaps it would be better fostered NOT as a technology project. If technology is needed somewhere to make it successful, then bring it in, but don't have it be the frame.

    2. As Herbert Simon observed: "Improvement in post-secondary education will require converting teaching from a 'solo sport' to a community-based research activity."

      Teaching is encouraged to be collaborative while the vision of the learner is still solitary.

    3. Understand that as difficult as the technology might be to envision, articulate, and implement, the culture changes required between where you are now and where you need to be to implement it will be much, much harder.

      If culture change is harder, why is it step 3?

    4. our systems need to be smart enough to direct learners back to review and relearning activities when the learners are struggling to remember or effectively apply previously demonstrated competencies at later stages in a program

      Crossing course and term boundaries.

    5. More advanced versions of CMA functionality would allow learners to specify their own learning goals, map them to learning activities and experiences, and discover ways to self-validate achievement of those goals.

      Enabling learner-directed mappings of goals, activities, validations is a secondary goal.

    6. A modern DLE of any generation is virtually unthinkable without standards support built in, readily available to connect and share data with a myriad of other tools and services.

      Standards, interoperability.

    7. By adaptively and dynamically updating learners' paths across programs, the N2GDLE increases the probability that students will achieve completion and earn credentials.

      N\(^2\)GLDE's goals and strategy in a nutshell.

    8. no significant change

      So it's not the technology that hasn't generated change, it's that the technology is tied to "semester-based sections of instructor-led courses", which I think is a human/institutional choice in how the technology is used.

    9. Unsurprisingly, neither of these domains has led to significant change to the traditional roles of or relationships between teachers and learners.

      Maybe a question of what counts as "significant change": the networked collaboration Long/Mott highlight HAS generated new relationships between/among teachers and learners.