140 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2019
  2. Dec 2018
    1. A longer-term goal, more in line with the vision of the NGDLE, is to develop a learning experience for students that seamlessly crosses platforms. A student might start by watching lectures on YouTube, then head to a web-based tool for creating a concept map before wrapping up with a shared WordPress site -- all within the confines of one platform.
  3. Nov 2018
  4. Oct 2018
    1. Lastly, professors need to fight for a post-LMS world that allows all faculty to make a living wage. I can’t help but suspect that at least some of the administrative fondness for learning management systems stems from a desire to systematize teaching and deskill professors as part of that process. When everything about teaching online is systematized and deskilled, it becomes easier to train anyone, anywhere to teach our courses.

      This is, I think, the core of the issue. All the worthy things the author calls for are not practical in a world where there aren't faculty positions with enough time and resources to make them work. The LMS is less about delivering online education than it is about delivering education in general in a controlled system with boundaries that helps make it easier to deliver without trained faculty with time on their hands.

  5. May 2018
  6. Feb 2018
  7. Jan 2018
  8. Dec 2017
  9. Nov 2017
    1. Do everything possible to minimize reliance on an enterprise LMS. Explore ways to support activity and content development in environments that foster collaboration and also interoperability with a wide range of tools. Before directing activity to a complex, locked-down system, ask: "Do we really need to do it this way? Is there a simpler, cheaper, open alternative that will do the job?"
    1. (At the time, Stephen Downes mocked me for thinking that this was an important aspect of LMS design to consider.)

      An interesting case where Stephen’s tone might have drowned a useful discussion. FWIW, flexible roles and permissions are among the key things in my own personal “spec list” for a tool to use with learners, but it’s rarely possible to have that flexibility without also getting a very messy administration. This is actually one of the reasons people like WordPress.

    2. And that, in fact, is a pretty good description of the IMS standard in development called Caliper, which is why I am so interested in it. In my recent post about walled gardens from the series that Jonathan mentions in his own post, I tried to spell out how Caliper could enable either a better LMS, a better world without an LMS, or both simultaneously.
  10. Oct 2017
  11. Sep 2017
    1. A commercial/proprietary vendor borrows funding, setting that borrowed funding against potential future revenue; an open-source community pools present capacity to create a sustainable future.

      The roadmap differences between proprietary and open/community source.

    2. Socio-economic factors are therefore potentially of particular significance to the NGDLE conversation, but are all too often not adequately represented or are reduced to a simplistic (and unsustainable, unless an infinitely expandable market is assumed) model of counting new LMS adoptions.

      socio-economic factors in LMS adoption

    3. we simply had far less experience in component-based architectures and open application programming interfaces (APIs) that allow the interconnection and communication of systems and components

      technical reasons for NGDLE failure

    4. At an institutional level, the lack of a clearly articulated transition path from the LMS to a potentially more flexible, component-based successor was undoubtedly a significant factor.

      Institutional reason for NGDLE failure.

  12. Jul 2017
    1. The word ecosystem, borrowed from its ecological and biological roots, here refers to the educational technology (edtech) market.

      Doesn't seem to include opensource and/or homegrown in the edtech ecosystem.

    1. It's hard to imagine instructors both constructing a new mash-up environment and crafting improved learning activities.

      Yes, and it's hard to imagine colleges and universities dedicating teams of people to help make this vision possible either in an era of dwindling resources.

    1. Now is the time to start our journey.

      It would be interesting to reconceive this entire project without the N\(2\)GDLE machine at the center. As it's mostly NOT a technology project, perhaps it would be better fostered NOT as a technology project. If technology is needed somewhere to make it successful, then bring it in, but don't have it be the frame.

    2. As Herbert Simon observed: "Improvement in post-secondary education will require converting teaching from a 'solo sport' to a community-based research activity."

      Teaching is encouraged to be collaborative while the vision of the learner is still solitary.

    3. Understand that as difficult as the technology might be to envision, articulate, and implement, the culture changes required between where you are now and where you need to be to implement it will be much, much harder.

      If culture change is harder, why is it step 3?

    4. our systems need to be smart enough to direct learners back to review and relearning activities when the learners are struggling to remember or effectively apply previously demonstrated competencies at later stages in a program

      Crossing course and term boundaries.

    5. More advanced versions of CMA functionality would allow learners to specify their own learning goals, map them to learning activities and experiences, and discover ways to self-validate achievement of those goals.

      Enabling learner-directed mappings of goals, activities, validations is a secondary goal.

    6. A modern DLE of any generation is virtually unthinkable without standards support built in, readily available to connect and share data with a myriad of other tools and services.

      Standards, interoperability.

    7. By adaptively and dynamically updating learners' paths across programs, the N2GDLE increases the probability that students will achieve completion and earn credentials.

      N\(^2\)GLDE's goals and strategy in a nutshell.

    8. no significant change

      So it's not the technology that hasn't generated change, it's that the technology is tied to "semester-based sections of instructor-led courses", which I think is a human/institutional choice in how the technology is used.

    9. Unsurprisingly, neither of these domains has led to significant change to the traditional roles of or relationships between teachers and learners.

      Maybe a question of what counts as "significant change": the networked collaboration Long/Mott highlight HAS generated new relationships between/among teachers and learners.

    10. We must utilize the tools we have at our disposal to finally close Benjamin Bloom's 2-sigma gap in achievement between personally tutored students and students in a traditional classroom.

      Primary goal: close Bloom's 2-sigma gap.

    11. we face an urgent societal need to fully, efficiently, and effectively help all individuals realize their potential as learners and practitioners across an expected lifetime of learning

      N\(^2\)GDLE should serve all people over whole lifetime.

    1. the NGDLE offers a way for institutions to more easily extract and share their learning community’s personal data with a wide range of sources, something that should deeply disturb us in the post-Snowden era. But the real kicker is, how do we get anyone to not only acknowledge this process of extraction and monetization (because I think folks have), but to actually feel empowered enough to even care.
  13. Jun 2017
  14. May 2017
  15. Mar 2017
  16. Feb 2017
    1. educators have a desire to unbundle all of the components of a learning experience

      I believe this "unbundling" is critical to the future of ed-tech, but curious about the evidence for the claim that this is something educators have demanded.

    2. Rather than existing as single applications, they are a “confederation of IT systems and application components that adhere to common standards ...that would enable diversity while fostering coherence.”

      This definition sounds a lot like the definition of the Web itself.

    1. That entanglement makes it harder to provide tools that support the tasks individually. If you can annotate segments of interest, though, you can disentangle the tasks, tool them separately, build the book more efficiently, and ensure others can more cleanly repurpose your work.

      The vision here seems more of a set of tools that can be integrated into various platforms rather than a single platform with a set of features. In this way, it's very similar to the idea behind EDUCAUSE's NGDLE initiative--or even Canvas's LTI-based app store.

  17. Jan 2017
    1. There is an increasingly diverse student population in today's colleges and universities, and a wide variety of modalities and course models. "Try to imagine a single application like an LMS that could possibly do justice to the wide range of needs," Brown said,

      It can't. One size cannot fit every pedagogical model.

  18. Oct 2016
    1. That this can be another chance for us to direct more of the conversations around teaching and learning and scholarship, rather than simply react to these persistent outside forces

      Many of the convos that happen at/around conferences very much do have the inside/outside dichotomies, which SUCKS.

      I often wonder if that tension is exactly what makes (or SHOULD make) education such an exciting field. Especially with so many internets out there nowadays.

      It is such a multi-faceted environment that reducing it to us vs them gives us targets/outcomes/objectives/metrics.

  19. Jul 2016
    1. The idea is to separate the course administrative tools & functions (like classlists and gradebooks) from the teaching and learning tools, and allow faculty to mix and match tools to fit their pedagogical needs.

      What's the role of content here?

    1. Instructional processes must begin and end with students ― with “learners and what they learn.” This idea—of shifting the focus away from an institution-centric construct and toward understanding and meeting the needs of students—is absolutely central.

      Very much aligns with the NGDLE movement at EDUCAUSE.

  20. Jun 2016
    1. Tomorrow’s system environments will better integrate collaboration and engagement features into the user experience, allowing faculty to easily make these features an integral part of their courses and providing students with flexible, varied, and ongoing means of engagement.

      This might be the key contribution h could make in this space.

    1. A mash-up is a web page or application that “uses content from more than one source to create a single new service displayed in a single graphical interface.”8Hence it uses a heterogeneity of components to produce a homogeneity of function.

      Fascinating. The reminds me of my hopes and dreams for the hypothes.is activity pages...

    2. Clusters of institutions could form consortia (such as Unizin or C-BEN)10to set up co-ops to provide a buffet of apps and other tools, either purchased or donated. In this case, each institution’s learning environment would be a unique blend of these components

      Reminding me of the idea Dan had about a consortium of open education tools...

    3. The Experience API is an example of an API that “makes itpossible to collect data about the wide range of experiences a person has (online and offline).”

      xAPI. What Billy Meinke was talking about.

    1. the LMS is valuable for handling the administrative duties of a course, it is less successful in effectively facilitating learning, especially as higher education actively develops new course models and pedagogical approaches.

      If what is missing from the LMS are actual learning tools, then certainly h adds an aspect of this.