10 Matching Annotations
- Aug 2023
-
-
Methodenstreit mischten sich zahlreichenamhafte Historiker und andere Geisteswissenschaftlerein. Warburg leistete keinen direkten publizistischen Bei-trag, nahm jedoch, wie der Zettelkasten belegt, als passi-ver Beobachter intensiv an der Debatte teil.359
Karl Lamprecht was one of Warburg's first teachers in Bonn and Warburg had a section in his zettelkasten dedicated to him. While Warburg wasn't part of the broader public debate on Lamprecht's Methodenstreit (methodological dispute), his notes indicate that he took an active stance on thinking about it.
Consult footnote for more:
59 Vgl. Roger Chickering, »The Lamprecht Controversy«, in: Historiker- kontroversen, hrsg. von Hartmut Lehmann, Göttingen 20 0 0, S. 15 – 29
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Lamprecht's ambitious Deutsche Geschichte (13 vols., 1891-1908) on the whole trajectory of German history sparked a famous Methodenstreit (methodological dispute) within Germany's academic history establishment, especially Max Weber, who habitually referred to Lamprecht as a mere dilettante. Lamprecht came under criticism from scholars of legal and constitutional history like Friedrich Meinecke and Georg von Below for his lack of methodological rigor and inattention to important political trends and ideologies. As a result, Lamprecht and his students were marginalized by German academia, and interdisciplinary social history remained something of a taboo among German historians for much of the twentieth century.
-
- Feb 2021
-
www.republik.ch www.republik.ch
-
Republik. (n.d.). Warum tun wir uns das eigentlich an? Retrieved 23 February 2021, from https://www.republik.ch/2021/02/22/warum-tun-wir-uns-das-eigentlich-an
-
-
10.11.66.200 10.11.66.200
-
Direct Express Dispute Processing PO Box 540190 Omaha, NE 68154-0190
-
disputes@my.usdirectexpress.com
-
+1-650-242-4112
-
- Nov 2017
-
mfeldstein.com mfeldstein.com
-
If you recall your LMS patent infringement history, then you'll remember that roles and permissions were exactly the thing that Blackboard sued D2L over.
-
- Jan 2017
-
static1.squarespace.com static1.squarespace.com
-
From hence it will unavoidably follow, that the complex ideas of substances in men using the same names for them, will be very various, and so the significations of those names very uncer-tain.
-
Besides, the rule and measure of propri-ety itself being nowhere established, it is often matter of dispute
Dispute is a way to think through rhetoric here.
-
- Feb 2014
-
www.law.uh.edu www.law.uh.edu
-
antive issue : A substantive statement of the issue consists of two parts -- i. the point of law in dispute ii. the key facts of the case re lating to that point of law in dispute (legally relevant facts) You must include the key facts from the case so that the issue is specific to that case. Typically, the disputed issue involves how the court applied some element of the pertinent rule to the facts of the specific case. Resolving the issue will determine the court’s disposition of the case.
- the point of law in dispute
- the key facts of the case relating to that point of law in dispute (legally relevant facts)
-