13K
这条推文被转发13000次,是互动数据中最高的指标,约为点赞数的10倍,回复数的46倍。这个高转发率表明消息具有高度传播价值,可能因为Apple意外泄露内部文件这一事件的新闻价值。这个数据点显示该消息在科技社区具有病毒式传播潜力。
13K
这条推文被转发13000次,是互动数据中最高的指标,约为点赞数的10倍,回复数的46倍。这个高转发率表明消息具有高度传播价值,可能因为Apple意外泄露内部文件这一事件的新闻价值。这个数据点显示该消息在科技社区具有病毒式传播潜力。
1.3K
这条推文获得了1300次点赞,与283条回复相比,点赞数约为回复数的4.6倍。这表明大多数用户选择简单表达认可而非深入讨论。这个数据点反映了用户对Apple可能集成Claude AI的积极态度,但同时也暗示话题可能未引发足够的技术深度讨论。
283 replies
这条推文有283条回复,虽然相对于250万浏览量来说比例较低(约0.011%),但仍表明有一定程度的讨论。这个数据点反映了用户对Apple内部开发流程和AI集成话题的参与度。相比普通技术推文,这个互动率处于中等水平,说明话题有一定但不是极高的讨论价值。
2.5M Views
这条推文获得了250万次浏览量,这是一个相当可观的数字,表明这个关于Apple Support应用更新的消息具有很高的关注度。考虑到这是一个技术性内容,这个浏览量显示了对Apple内部开发流程和潜在AI集成的公众兴趣。这个数据点反映了公众对科技巨头内部运作的好奇程度。
19.3M Views
这条裁员推文获得了1930万次观看,远高于普通CEO声明的传播量。这反映了加密货币行业的高度关注度和公众对Coinbase作为行业领导者的特别关注。这一数据点也显示了Armstrong的公众影响力以及该声明对整个加密行业的潜在影响。
Fischer, O., Jeitziner, L., & Wulff, D. U. (2021). Affect in science communication: A data-driven analysis of TED talks. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/28yc5
Frost, M. (n.d.). Busting COVID-19 vaccination myths. Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://acpinternist.org/archives/2021/11/busting-covid-19-vaccination-myths.htm
Lo, C., Mani, N., Kartushina, N., Mayor, J., & Hermes, J. (2021, February 11). e-Babylab: An Open-source Browser-based Tool for Unmoderated Online Developmental Studies. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u73sy
Mak, H. W., & Fancourt, D. (2020). Predictors of engaging in voluntary work during the Covid-19 pandemic: Analyses of data from 31,890 adults in the UK. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/er8xd
Yamada, Y. (2020). Micropublishing during and after the COVID-19 era [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8fum4
Czarnek, G., Szwed, P., & Kossowska, M. (2020). Political ideology and attitudes toward vaccination: Study report. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/uwehk
It doesn’t work if we think the people who disagree with us are all motivated by malice, or that our political opponents are unpatriotic. Democracy grinds to a halt without a willingness to compromise; or when even basic facts are contested, and we listen only to those who agree with us.
C'mon, civic technologists, government innovators, open data advocates: this can be a call to arms. Isn't the point of "open government" to bring people together to engage with their leaders, provide the facts, and allow more informed, engaged debate?