Skills 的传播没有像 App 那样可以靠搜索、靠排名。用户更加追求结果导向,而不是过程导向。
这一洞察揭示了AI技能与普通应用的本质差异,用户不再关心界面和交互体验,而是直接关注结果质量,这表明未来技能评估体系需要重新设计,以结果和效率为核心指标。
Skills 的传播没有像 App 那样可以靠搜索、靠排名。用户更加追求结果导向,而不是过程导向。
这一洞察揭示了AI技能与普通应用的本质差异,用户不再关心界面和交互体验,而是直接关注结果质量,这表明未来技能评估体系需要重新设计,以结果和效率为核心指标。
The prompt is the most important part: the routine runs autonomously, so the prompt must be self-contained and explicit about what to do and what success looks like.
这个声明揭示了Routines成功的关键在于提示工程的精确性。与传统的自动化脚本不同,Routines的有效性完全依赖于提示的质量,这强调了AI辅助开发中提示工程的重要性,也为用户提供了新的技能挑战。
Cephalosporins or extended-spectrum penicillins are commonly used (eg, cephalexin, 0.5 g orally four times daily for 7–10 days; see Table 35–6). Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (two double-strength tablets orally twice daily for 7–10 days) should be considered when there is concern that the pathogen is MRSA (see Tables 35–5 and 35–6). Vancomycin, 15 mg/kg intravenously every 12 hours, is used for patients with signs of a systemic inflammatory response.
cephalexin, dicloxacillin, penicillin VK, amoxicillin/clavulanate, or clindamycin (for penicillin-allergic patients). [1-2] These beta-lactam antibiotics provide excellent coverage against streptococci and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA
Treatment of superficial vein reflux (see Varicose Veins, above) has been shown to decrease the recurrence rate of venous ulcers. Where there is substantial obstruction of the femoral or popliteal deep venous system, superficial varicosities supply the venous return and should not be removed.
Failure of venous insufficiency ulcerations to heal is most often due to inconsistent use of first-line treatment methods. Ongoing control of edema is essential to prevent recurrent ulceration; the use of compression stockings following ulcer healing is critical, with recurrence rates 2–20 times higher if compression stockings are not used
for - from - youtube - Just have a think - A controversial new paper challenges established emissions accounting criteria - https://hyp.is/9AQ6VF2SEfCsW8_68Y6AUA/www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9f16OTL1Lg - climate crisis - ERF - agriculture 60% - fossil fuels 18% - agriculture is the biggest contributor to carbon emissions summary - This paper uses Effective Radiative Forcing (ERF) as a metric to measure global carbon emissions instead of the traditional Global Warming Potential (GWP) - It points out the problematic nature of GWP and how ERF provides a more accurate picture - Using ERF, the most surprising result of this study is that agriculture is the leading sector causing global warming - Measured from a baseline of emissions since 1750, - agriculture contributes 60% while - fossil fuels contributes 18% - Projects like Project Drawdown already prioritize agriculture, this gives even more validation and priority on transforming the agricultural sector - This also increases importance on efforts in: - regenerative farming - bioreginalism - permaculture - agroforestry - rewilding
Sure, it is not needed, we can always write things in a different way. As a matter of fact, with such an argument, hardly any improvement should be accepted.
The criteria for code in lib is what @dhh said above: non-app specific library code that just happens to live in the app for now (usually pending extraction into open source or whatever)
Criteria
Specific earning criteria offers transparency.
Complete Solo Teaching Requirement / Final which requires 10 hours of classes as solo instructor.
"Complete" speaks to measurables that may not be transparently aligned with the competencies. This criteria statement however does specify that the completion means the earner has done 10 hours of solo instruction. That's helpful. Even better would be if those 10 solo classes were supported with assessment beyond just showing up. The alignment to external standards is also a model example.
Proposed effective human resources initiatives based on workforce analytic
Solid earning criteria. Linking to rubric or something measurable would be even better.
Cohen was reluctant to provide reference values for his standardized effect size measures. Although he stated that d = 0.2, 0.5 and 0.8 correspond to small, medium and large effects, he specified that these values provide a conventional frame of reference which is recommended when no other basis is available.
Each commit should meet the following criteria: Have a well-written commit message. Has all tests passing when used on its own (e.g. when using git checkout SHA). Can be reverted on its own without also requiring the revert of commit that came before it. Is small enough that it can be reviewed in isolation in under 30 minutes or so.
This can be done as a combination of given-when-then test cases, reference designs, and, depending on how closely PM-tech works, ongoing calibration.
Definition of Done (DoD) is a list of requirements that a user story must adhere to for the team to call it complete. While the Acceptance Criteria of a User Story consist of set of Test Scenarios that are to be met to confirm that the software is working as expected.
What is End User Computing (EUC)? Thanks to the progressive introduction of DevOps, attention to the role of the end user in software development and testing has increased significantly. It is now important to think like an end user when we develop and test software. After all, that's what we're all doing it for.
What is End User Computing (EUC)?
Thanks to the progressive introduction of DevOps, attention to the role of the end user in software development and testing has increased significantly. It is now important to think like an end user when we develop and test software. After all, that's what we're all doing it for.

ICoBC Quality Criteria for Badges and Micro-Credentials
Clear framework for quality criteria
t be issued for unevaluated learning accomplishments, such as the mere completion of a series of tasks, attendance at events, or for learning that has not been assessed, as competency and learning accomplishment evaluation is very important.
Criteria must be measurable and assessable.
he first criterion of adequacy in this approach is that the active voice of the subject should be heard
is the interpretation adequate? criteria for answering the question of adequacy is outlined. 1) not objectifying 2) theoretical underpinning must allow for interpretation of the social dynamic of observer-subject. 3) The theoretical reworking has to allow for the revelation of underlying social structures.
These stages postdate the Permo‐Carboniferous glaciation but retain a moderately steep equator‐to‐pole gradient, judging by the level of floral and faunal differentiation
overall gradient?
Stratil, Jan M., Maike Voss, and Laura Arnold. “WICID Framework Version 1.0: Criteria and Considerations to Guide Evidence-Informed Decision-Making on Non-Pharmacological Interventions Targeting COVID-19.” BMJ Global Health 5, no. 11 (November 1, 2020): e003699. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003699.
You particular circumstances may or may not warrant a way different from what lhunath (and other users) deem "best practices".
Tiokhin, L. (2021, April 21). Why indirect contributions matter for science and scientists. Medium. https://leonidtiokhin.medium.com/why-indirect-contributions-matter-for-science-and-scientists-6c9bf827bc7d
Deevybee. (2020, December 6). BishopBlog: Faux peer-reviewed journals: a threat to research integrity. BishopBlog. http://deevybee.blogspot.com/2020/12/faux-peer-reviewed-journals-threat-to.html
Rules of thumb on magnitudes of effect sizes
Rules of thumb on magnitudes of effect sizes
ad-hocactivity management system
Is this a tool that can be incorporated into the PCS, around which the players' (and specific roles) coordinate their activities....?
‘Travel and Transportation during the Coronavirus Pandemic | European Commission’. Accessed 7 September 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/info/live-work-travel-eu/health/coronavirus-response/travel-and-transportation-during-coronavirus-pandemic_en#a-common-approach-to-travel-measures.
So, which is better? t.inspect # => "2007-11-01 15:25:00 8483885939586761/68719476736000000 UTC" t.inspect # => "2007-11-01 15:25:00.123456789000000004307366907596588134765625 UTC"
Protogerou, Cleo, and Martin S. Hagger. ‘A Checklist to Assess the Quality of Survey Studies in Psychology’, 14 July 2020. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/uqak8.
Mei, Q., Li, J., Du, R., Yuan, X., Li, M., & Li, J. (2020). Assessment of patients who tested positive for COVID-19 after recovery. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30433-3
Whether it's "better" for your implementation is up for you to decide.
The magnitude of the Pearson correlation coefficient determines the strength of the correlation. Although there are no hard-and-fast rules for assigning strength of association to particular values, some general guidelines are provided by Cohen (1988):
Magnitude of pearson correlation coeficient.
attendance and attitude were the most common grading criteria employed by instrumental and choral music teachers.
Yes. I noticed that in schools.
de-familiarization
I really admire these qualitative criteria here. I imagine these concepts will prove useful going forward with this class.
word clouds
One year during the beginning of word clouds, two of my students created a project for the rest of the class -- paragraphs honoring veterans also presented as word clouds -- but explaining their organization, layout, colors, fonts, and word choice. What would work best to enhance the message. I thought that was clever of them.
It was the degree of centrality to the white population of the state which alone then constituted the important point of comparison between these places
This was really unsettling for me read. Proximity to the most white people is the one criteria that made the difference in where the University's location was chosen. If Charlottesville hadn't been most central to the white population of Virginia, UVa would be located in Lexington or in Staunton. Its definitely not a good thing that our school was centered around pleasing only the white race before our grounds were even built. I can't imagine how different our grounds would be and our university if another place had been more convenient for white people. UVa certainly has a racist past and I think most of us, if not all, are aware of that but I still couldn't believe that such a racist criteria is the reason the school exists where it does today and is the way Uva is today.
No longer the fault has to be made. from the columb failure to the firction failure is that there is no cohersion coefficient
The relationship between the shear stresses vs the normal stresses will determine the type of fracture seen and it is called the composite failure envelope- KNOW THIS PAGE
Coulomb failure criterion: shear stress = Cohesion + The multiplication between the normal stress and mu is the coefficient of internal friction.
KNOW THE SHEAR FAILURE CRITERIA PAGES !!!
sigma 1- sigma3= sigma failure..... There is a straight line between the failure point of shear stress and the difference between sigma 3 and sigma 1.
There's failure points of larger differences will be of the same angle... in the diagram it;s about 60 degrees. this is the coefficient of internal friction or mu.
IF you generate a fault is always 30 degrees to sigma 1 and 60 degrees to sigma 3
(a) those who work together on the research project throughout its duration or for a large part of it, or who make frequent or substantial contribution; (b) those whose names or posts appear in the original research proposal ~9; (c) those responsible for one or more of the main elements of the research (e.g. the experimental de- sign, construction of research equipment, execution of the experiment, analysis and interpretation of the data 20 writing up the results in a paper).
Some core definitions:
Criteria for performance, such as the Alverno criteria for speaking across the curriculum guide the interaction between student and teacher.
The purpose of criteria is not about judgment or meeting standards, it's a precursor for conversation or interaction between teacher and student.
Using explicit criteria, the student develops the ability to look at her own work and determine the strengths and weaknesses evident in a particular performance or across a set of performances. She begins to set goals to address the areas she needs to develop and to deepen her areas of strength.
The obvious paradox here is that the more "explicit" and digestible (student friendly) our criteria, the more a student can be independent in assessing her own work. That's a wonderful tension between top-down criteria and bottom-up assessment.
"What connections can I make between what I'm learning in one class with what rm learning in another?" ""What questions do I have about my learning?"
Versions of these questions would be good for us to consider in our portfolio panels.
We decided to make a spreadsheet of the possible environments we would consider using for our next generation product. The inputs were: Community Velocity Correctness (aka, static typing-like things) Debuggability/Tooling Downtime/Compile Time Libraries (Standard/External) Testability Team Experience Performance Production We setup the spreadsheet so we could change the weight of each category. This let us play with our feelings, what if we only cared about developer velocity? What if we only cared about testability?
Good considerations for selecting a platform.