This monetization strategy highlights a potential risk of the PRC model being co-opted by commercial publishers to prioritize profit over the principles of openness andaccessibility. By charging for submissions, even those that do not proceed to full curationor publication, journals could exploit the publish-first ethos of PRC for financial gain,further complicating the already high cost of academic publishing for researchers andcausing even more inequities.
good to see this focus on the way money flows in the scholarly communications system...I wonder if it might not be brought up earlier as a concern to more fully addressed in its proper place as it is here...