废话多，直接说把两个人一起杀了

删除

This stood out to me because people’s backgrounds can play a big part in how they feel about AI. Some people might like using AI for extra help but still want to make the final decisions themselves. Do you all believe culture affects how much people are willing to trust AI?

This demonstrates how much AI is already part of our everyday lives. We use it for things like online shopping, but it also plays a bigger role in areas like healthcare and finance.

This is fantastic. It perfectly encapsulates the feeling that I might get when I'm confronted by someone I love or respect saying something that I just can't get behind. The feeling that you may love someone unconditionally and want to avpid any conflict with them, but their beliefs fundamentally contradict yours.

I think this is the most important part of the essay, as it shows the unconditional love that family has, despite all their disagreements. It also shows that she tries to separate her brother from his personal beliefs, which is what originally caused their problems in the first place.

I liked how she captured his sarcasm here, allowing us to know just how serious the conflict between Ted and his family is. It also shows how distant he has become as well. The sarcastic tone makes the moment even more impactful, with him rejecting his own family.

I actually work at a McDonald's and we are constantly told to push things onto customers when honestly, I think its awkward and a waste of time. If someone asks, I am of course willing to help! It's just fast food is so awkward and there are so many INTERESTING people you will meet.

The other day I decided to try the Wendy's pretzel pub sandwich, which was 12 for a meal, not my proudest moment. And I was determined to try it and made my friend drive me there and wait in the excruciatingly long line. It tasted horribly! Then at some point, I realized how sloppy and unhealthy it is. The next day I went to the doctor and was told I need a cholesterol test...I am only 17.

Since I'm pretty young and broke, I too have a strained relationship with fast food, just like most Americans. On one hand, it's easily accessible, somewhat affordable, and very comforting, but on the other hand its greasy, unhealthy, and societally has a negative connotation.

Shows what the McRib did to her digestive system and how it felt.

She use a interesting comparison to show how she felt about the McRib.

Shows how she feels on fast food chains and what they're doing to our society.

This is how she grabs the readers attention, it makes you think about if you have ever had a McRib.

This comparison makes the bread sound dry and gross. The description helps readers imagine the experience without tasting it.

This complicates her negative review. Hunger seemed to influence her actions more than her opinion.

Her background shapes her expectations of barbecue. I think this will make her dislike the food even more.

She recognizes the achievement even though she dislikes the product.

The low price makes buying extra food feel like a reward instead of a bad purchase.

This sounds exaggerated. She does not provide nutrition information to justify her statement like the grams of fat or something along those lines.

The sold-out signs make her assume the sandwich must be good, even though she was skeptical before.

Trying something for the first time does not automatically make someone unbiased. Shilcutt already expects to dislike the McRib and describes it negatively before tasting it. This makes me question her final opinion.

This shows how the author became very curious about the mcrib, and how he went down a rabbit hole on facebook of learning about mcribs.

Hola

This is a statement that does drive me up the wall as it is unfortunately a huge issue. The internet is an incredible aspect of our every day lives and its openness is often taken for granted. I do however think it has also opened the floodgates for many opportunists seeking to make a profit at every single corner. It feels like many open source sites is under threat by a hyper-fixation on monetizing every detail. And if its not content, or advertising, its our data being sold to corporations many of which the common person hasn't even heard of. It's disheartening to see the trajectory form in this way.

I found the title and image used very interesting. Instead of saying "the end' or "potential end" for the open web, Dash chose the word "endgame". It is possible Dash chose the word to represent how the open web was similar to a game in the sense that it was a creative space. Another personal theory is that the word "endgame" references how crucial these next few steps are in supporting open web and not AI generated or closed infostructures. Although my previous thought is most likely the reason, Dash may have choose this word to symbolize how we are all pawns in a game bigger than entertaining ourselves/searching online (i.e., tech business, political control, etc.). Furthermore, I found the image fascinating. At a quick glance you see a dimly light caged tunnel leading to the unknown. Very similar to the path of AI, where we are being guided/forced into the unknown AI jungle. However, if you look closely to the top right corner, you can somewhat see "outside". Possibly this symbolizes open web/open infostructures and how they are barley present. Or, I am thinking too much into this and Dash got the word Endgame because they like Avengers and the image was the first one they found on the web.

I think this is an incredibly relevant point in this era of the internet, when we see billionaires and political figures trying to take over social media platforms ultimately for power. Social media and other technologies are currently the main source of information (especially in a political and news context) for the average person, taking control of these platforms gives them control over the narrative that is presenting. Effectively eliminating free speech in an attempt to silence critical voices rather than fostering open debate and criticism.

The description of the open web as a “radical” concept called to mind a handful of videos I’ve come across recently in which people have been discussing the nature of traditional libraries and how strange or even radical they might sound if they were pitched for the first time today: a publicly funded building where anyone can walk in, borrow just about any book, film, cd, or video game they want for free, and access information without having to prove in any way that they can afford it. Obviously libraries are far from radical nowadays, being long-established and something that all of us have grown up around. In fact, the idea of free and open access to knowledge has become so normalized that we almost take for granted how unusual it is compared to systems where access is determined by those who can pay. We’re spoiled, even complacent, and I would say this is especially true of those of us who have scarcely known life pre-internet. We’re so accustomed to being able to access an enormous amount of information, literature, art, entertainment and online communities for free that it feels like that level of openness is guaranteed. The reality is that it is very likely to become increasingly filtered and controlled by companies whose primary incentive is greed and to whom free access is a missed opportunity for monetary gain.

I disagree that people will choose "home-cooked, locally-grown, heart-felt digital meals" as opposed to "factory-farmed fast food technology." This new wave of the internet/technology has made information so accessible. With access to information no longer restricted by pay walls, post secondary institutions or even fear of judgement, I think we would be hard pressed as a society to want to revert to exclusivity. Not all peoples value education in the same way. We as educators and scholars are accustomed to research and dedicating time to solving problems, the general public values timelines, so if reverting to a heart-felt digital era increases the time that it takes to complete their daily tasks, they will reject it.

Although creators who stay independent and maintain control of their content make less money, I know myself and other audience members appreciate it. A lot of creators are either loosing or gaining followers based on authenticity, or at least this has been a trend I have noticed lately. As a society, we are already being flooded with advertisements, fake news and illusionary expectations. It is refreshing to obtain information or advice from a real person, who has truly tested and loved the product. I am only speaking to what I know, I am aware that there are many other types of creators out there; however, my main sources are beauty, fashion and health creators. I hope that this upward trend toward authenticity is just the thing to lessen to use of AI and bring out the human creativity/connection our society needs.

While I think that it is important to foster hope and stand up for what we believe in, I am skeptical that small individual actions would be the best way to evoke change in this scenario. When up the obstacle you are up against is an industry comprised of some of the wealthiest people on the planet who's own agenda will take precedent, I think we have to tackle the issue accordingly. They will not listen to us as individuals but if we band together and bring our concerns to the appropriate authorities (though i'm not quite sure who that would be...), we will have more success working together.

I am curious how many podcasts with significant followings are not on Spotify, Apple, and Netflix. I believe that the disclosure of large deals such as that of Joe Rogan and Spotify's up to $250 million deal has led many to chase a "golden goose" on these larger platforms. I can't say I dislike having my podcasts and music both available on Spotify but I do wonder how much of my listening is being influenced by their algorithms. I am going to have to start looking for more creatives focused platforms to consume my media from! With how AI is steering any form of internet content consumption I worry that it may be quite the challenge.

I find this very concerning, because I think it goes beyond cultural or political power they can't control. I think these powerful agencies will go to these lengths against cultural or political powers that they do not believe in, or that does not align with their personal agenda. This proves how intense digital media influence can be. Behaviour priming is often used in advertisement by overexposing the audience to a certain product so they feel compelled to buy it. For example, a clothing brand may have adds on billboards, TV, newspapers, magazines, online adds, etc. A similar concept can occur with beliefs/perspectives. But instead of buying a product, the audience is leaning into the advertised viewpoints/perspectives. Therefore, if a "big tech financer or venture capitalist" decides they do not agree with a certain political or cultural point of views, it is possible they will change the narrative and bombard the audience with viewpoints that align with them. Which in turn, may persuade the audience to change or gain the perspective they are pushing.

I am curious what specific open source projects the author refers to here. The prevalence of AI has certainly led to some unintentional shortcuts that could have potentially used copyrighted materials. There is also the potential for the AI coding used by community members to be flawed. I am curious how smaller projects are doing. I would assume that they are likely safer as the could be more niche but I am rather ignorant when it comes to open source projects. Will AI at some point gain enough freedom to start creating its own open source materials?

Regarding the all-powerful, almost mythic control held by multibillionaires and their media corporations, Meta unsurprisingly comes to mind. Facebook long had one primary competitor in the form of Instagram, a social media platform which largely monopolized the younger portion of the population Facebook could not reach. What did Meta do in response? Bought out Instagram. They then turned to their remaining competitors, honing in on any unique features that attracted users, such as stories on Snapchat and short form vertical videos on TikTok, and in turn added stories and reels to their own newly-acquired platform. Similarly, they saw that sites like Kijiji, Craigslist or Varagesale were having great success, and introduced Marketplace to ensure that users had even fewer reasons to ever step out from under the Facebook umbrella. The whole process by which Meta absorbs and ultimately replaces its competitors assures the maintaining of a monolopy and the lining of Zuckerburg's already ample pockets.

If podcasts shift to being only offered on closed infostructures that approve their partners, it is possible that the freedom and creativity of the creator will be jeopardized. Creators who will want to continue, or grow their audience, may need to change their content to meet the closed infostructures standards/wants. Therefore, eliminating the whole purpose of creating content - creativity. Not only is it possible that their content may change, but creators may be require to recommend products they do not necessarily believe in, because they are apart of a contract with a closed infostructure. This may erase any trust audience members have with the creator.

This makes me wonder if "extremist CEO's" do not want the public to understand their own online behaviors. It is possible that their intention is to keep people unaware of their online behaviour (e.g., addiction, reliance on AI, increased trolling, etc.) for their own agenda. I know I may be starting a conspiracy, but it is possible that things are more than CEO's wanting platform security.

I find this upsetting. It can be assumed that creators utilize open platforms to share content, that can be easily accessed, with their community. Regardless if the creators goal is to build a community of like minded individuals, monetize their talents, or make their talent/information more accessible to the public, creators should be given acknowledgment. Sadly, AI bots, are capitalizing on these open sources. Leaving the possibility of the audience potentially bypassing the creator entirely.

Speaking as a creative, the unfortunate truth is that, staying independent and not giving in to the exploited internet practices is not the "right way to connect with an audience." Nowadays, because we (society) have become addicted and somewhat reliant to these platforms (social medias, AI chat bots, etc), in addition to the fact that they collect our data (voluntary or involuntarily) they are actually the perfect way to 'connect' with an audience. These platforms use highly sophisticated algorithms to push your content out to it's most ideal consumer, therefore, sometimes it is actually more beneficial to utilize these tools than merely survive by staying independent...from a marketing standpoint at least.

From my understanding, with every search automatically spewing out AI responses (unless asked not to), search engines are no longer providing "marketing through accessibility" to independent content creators. Besides the obvious elimination of research/browsing need, it is possible that these sites may be utilized in an AI generated answer. However, I believe that the speed at which the public has been introduced to AI does not compliment the publics media literacy skills. Meaning, it is possible that people are trusting the "scraped" information delivered by AI (e.g., LLMs, Chatgbt, etc.) and will never click on the resources (or sites) to fact check. Therefore, creators will never get the compensation, or recognition, they deserve.

If generative AI is gathering its information from open web sources, yet not citing the resources thus leading to a tank in viewership of the original source this could pose a large issue. If these open web sources end up dying out then there is no source for AI to gather info from. I would imagine that AI would start filling in the gaps by itself leading to much larger inaccuracies in the information provided, and therefore a larger amount of misinformation being spread.

I remember just a few short years ago becoming familiar with the concept of "dead Internet theory" and brushing it off, perhaps naively, as a conspiracy theory or something decades away from being possible. Today, I have witnessed first hand when social media platforms or other corners of the web are populated almost entirely by AI bots thanks to the advent of bot farms. It's a disturbing and isolating sensation as a user to discover, upon even brief inspection of the "profiles" in a comment section that none of those interacting with particular content are human beings. Publishers are evidently beginning to recognize this same danger with bots; if AI can consume and reproduce human-created content while also flooding the web with content of its own, it seems inevitable that the internet will become increasingly difficult to distinguish from something that is largely, or entirely, automated.

The increasing number of companies shutting down or restricting access to formerly open APIs has alarming implications. This is concerning, not only in the case of extremist CEOs hiding the inner workings of their platforms or companies putting up substantial paywalls for access as the author suggests, but also as it hinders research and innovation that would have come from the previously open APIs.

The idea of "good AI" is a very hopeful thought, but I believe it can only be achieved with heavy regulation and monitoring of these tools. I think it will be a long time before our society will ever get close to having a "good AI". I believe it will be difficult for regulatory bodies to enforce the policies and regulations needed to control AI, especially with how deeply integrated big AI is already in our life.

I appreciate the sentiment, but I think that the convenience and sheer speed of AI's responses has been overlooked by the author. The uses of AI are almost limitless, and almost anything can be generated within seconds. While I would hope that most people would choose human generated over AI slop, I do not think this is the case. Not only is it difficult for many people to differentiate between human and AI content, but I would also argue that most people do not know (or care) what is going on behind the scenes and just accept AI models as wonderful tools. We cannot ignore the fact that most people using these tools may not be fully aware of the implications, but are just perfectly happy with the outputs they receive and will continue to use it.

This is also a problem for one specific reason because if I website is running ads for monetary gain to run or pay for their servers and keep their website up, then how are they getting that if their views are constantly diminished by AI? It is very possible that sites shut down because of these problems.

And to add to that, later in the article it is talking about Wikipedia. They get their funding from donations, but less people going to their website will incur less money made to keep the website going. Where would we be without Wikipedia?

I like and appreciate how the writer gave direct soltuions to how we can and take action and also providing links with the many ways we can help make a change. Towards the end of the paragraph he is transparent about how he himself is part of these initiatives which is why he suggested them, to which I think is a great way of having open/honest communication with the audience. He also mentioned how he himself has seen action be taken which gives the reader reassurance of this sources being reliable to work with.

This is something I actually did not take into account for and forgot how much of a negative affect this would have for new coders starting out their career. Because yes having to build social networks/ relationships, and coding community is going to become a lot harder for them with automated AI coding agents that can essentially replace their jobs at some point. It just comes to show how AI is coming to be in effect of replacing one of the many jobs it already has and cause financial difficulties for new coding individuals trying to build their career.

AI is its own animal at this point, and these “bots” can collect and use information so quickly that it makes you wonder how we could realistically keep up with it. That being said, this comment really made me start questioning how we would actually impose and enforce limits on AI use so these publishers can still have some control over how their content is being used.

This paragraph correctly notes LCC's reliance on literary warrant and It’s lack of an explicit theoretical foundation, but it fails to acknowledge the deeper structural biases embedded in the scheme. LCC is not merely theoretically thin, it is epistemologically partial; reflecting the worldview, priorities, and discipline hierarchies of the institution that produced it.

Hope Olson and others have shown that LCC’s claim to universality masks hierarchical and binary structures that privilege dominant cultural perspectives. For example, the Fine Arts schedule privileges “fine art” over “craft,” reinforcing Western, patriarchal, and colonialist value systems.

add a note here and elsewhere, along the lines of: We realize that you might have doubts about the value of adding content, ratings and comments on a largely AI-driven site. We'll try to personally respond to each substantial comment or engagement. And if you have doubts or want to flag us specifically, feel free to email contact@unjournal.org.

How the heck does this graph go with this equation?? Maybe graph 6.2.11?

Where did this come from? We never discussed it as related to sinusoidal functions.

This is really unclear. The graph markings don't make anything obvious, which it's supposed to. y=-8 isn't indicated. This should really state where x is an asymptote in equation form. It was explained that x cannot = pi/(2B)k, but that has never been used in an example.

you have yet to show any work-through for this. How many people wrote this section on Trigonometry??

Is this supposed to be pi*x/3 for Bx?

This does not look like a vertical reflection of the preceding graph. The entire function is of a csc graph.

How did you find A without any reference points that aren't equal to zero? If I double the period in x=pi, doesn't the amplitude also double? P=pi/A, A=pi/P, P=pi/2, A=pi/(pi/2)=2. (P/4,A) Ratios like this seem to be glanced over.

Where have you used (P/4,A)?

I find it interesting that sports can have Taboos because I personally more often associated a Taboo with a social norm- what you should and should not do to ward off negative associations.

I think this specification that a Fetish is more typically a physical item helps differentiate a Fetish from a ritual. While Rituals are done to seek something often from a higher power they are private actions while a Fetish is a item to 'embody luck' or the preferred outcome. For example holding onto an old charm to continue its controlled outcome.

While shelling out money to create an experience for viewers may seem odd, it has shown to be much for effective than simply putting a statement out, or conversations/discussions to be held to get said viewer to understand or agree with the rhetors argument. Rather than convincing the audience that this is truth or worth something, they are putting them through an emotional experience that people want.

I find this to be a very interesting and agreeable definition to entertainment in relation to religion beause it emphazises the immersion that people look for specifically with religion, in my personal beliefs I can understand and have observed that groups of people participate in church not for the connection with the scripture or testimonies, but the community and experience. This leads me to question to motives of churches in correlation to this idea.

I find it fascinating that regardless of an individual’s education level, that the need to try and midigate the fear of uncertainty and the uncontrollable remains present across peoples and time. It’s similar to the example given of pigeons replicating behaviour for food pellets as a result of classical conditioning. Humans are no different in that regard as they are participating in a non burdensome action in order to (even if irrationally rooted) guarantee a given outcome.

I was unfamiliar with this term outside of the context of pop culture. Without being inappropriate I now see the connection to this definition and the one I was familiar with with an object serving as a conduit of luck or enjoyment.

je remplirai cette section en insérant toutes les références biblio du texte

Je suis d'accord avec Xavier T que le titre n'est pas juste mais pas de dd pour le budget US ne l'est pas non plus car : on ne sait pas si ils vont devoir rembourser toutes les recettes des droits IEEPA tant que la décision sur l'appel de l'administration Trump n'est pas rendue et depuis février 2026 les droits section 122 rapportent des recettes et ceux section 301 depuis fin juillet également sans compter tous les autres dd mis en place...

remplacer par courant américain

était

minuscule

Ici tu mets une note pour parler des dd sur lkes produits canadiens mais tu ne dis pas que Le 24 juillet 2026 ces droits de douane section 122 ont été remplacés par des surtaxes section 301 (travail forcé) pour 60 pays. Comme on est en septembre et que dans ton billet tu parles des dd réciproques remplacés par section 122 on s'attend à ce que tu donnes cette information.

L'administration Trump a fait appel en juin de l'obligation de rembourser notamment je crois pour les importateurs qui n'ont pas fait de demande. Et je ne pense pas que l'on connaisse la décision qui a été rendue. Du coup ils n'auront peut être pas à rembourser autant. Il faudrait au moins une note pour le préciser

accent

remplacer par qui font

accent

supprimer

supprimer

remplacer par : ,

supprimer, (c'est sur l'axe des ordonnées)

minuscule

mobilisées

minuscule

accent

italique

remplacer par : pour en mettre en place

supprimer

remplacer par s'appliquent

accent

supprimer le s

mettre l'accent

supprimer, si elle est extraordinaire elle est non usuelle, non?

tu précises en note que tel n'est pas le cas du papier le plus récent sur le sujet, celui de Caroline Freund, puisque le pass through n'est que de 50% et dans son papier elle explique pourquoi elle obtient un résultat différent de ce qui existait jusque-là qui semble assez convaincant. Du coup si tu ne le retiens pas c'est j'imagine parce que tu as des réserves sur sa méthode et ce serait bien de les donner

It's wild to realize that something so common to us like celebrating Valentine's Day in elementary school was a completely foreign concept to Trevor growing up.

It is heartbreaking how quickly individuals surrendered their heritage and history just to gain white status.

enforced using arbitrary and dehumanizing physical assessments like the pencil test.

Most platforms have a closed captioning option you can select. While its not always the most accurate, it is a thing and not something the creator has to always add.

They become the devil because of their actions that were inspired by the English

Was anyone truly innocent?

The colonial encounter being written by the English seems unfair in this story; she is writing about her trauma and loss, but completely neglecting the same feelings of the Native Americans.

She and the English had very selfish thinking and painted them as evil for the problems they started.

Felt too much sympathy for themselves to understand why they are in this position in the first place! Privilege.

Elevates the stories somber details of her journey made this read confusing and hard to follow. I questioned many aspects of the story that seemed unfinished.

Feeling both empathy and a sense of confusion because of the racism and hypocrisy of the story

Looking at this sentence through the virtue lens, we see that Amodei is struggling between what is best for humanity, and what is best monetarily for the company (and himself). This shows the integrity that Amodei posesses. He and his team could easily participate in this race to the bottom, or they could do what virtue ethics would advise, and hold back against commercial enticement. Virtue ethics would advise us to choose the latter, benefitting our overall humanity by staying true to our ethics, even when human impulses may urge otherwise. Now if I go ahead and apply a second lens to this same sentence such as the common good lense, we see these ideas further reinforced. We should all have compassion for eachother, meaning we should choose the option which benefits the most people long term rather than acting on those listed above impulses. This slowing down however is not as easy as we may have thought. Would humanity be benefitted more or less from the slowing down of this system? Why do a few people get to make a decision which will impact all of humanity? Where can I find supple information to help me learn? What can I then do with this knowledge to benefit humanity? These are all questions which both of these lenses would have you ask. I believe that both the virtue and common good lens should be in higher priority from which we view things, as they seek to benefit masses of people rather than individuals. This is essentially helpful as AI impacts billions of people daily.

Common Good Lens: While companies have the right to choose whether to be transparent with the public or not, this does buttheads with the common good lens. The public deserves companies that will be honest with them, especially when it comes to fast development in technology. AI affects everyone, and not everyone understands it. Society would benefit from having open communication from companies, especially with something as huge as AI.

Right Lens: When looking at it through the right lens, many rights will be at stake. AI companies and their employees risk forms of scrutiny, while workers and creators risk losing jobs that could have Ai advancements replace them. Entire communities could risk their rights to clean and safe water, heating, and financial services if too-advanced AI systems fail or are misused. An AI company does have the right to expose the public to risks since it could give the company beneficial outcomes when it comes to public opinion. The companies have the right to choose to share information and risks and how much of it they do share, but the public also has the right to demand information as well. A company can choose not to share, but the public still can want those answers and information, especially when there are the potential for risks.

After reading the excerpt from Lempriere's Classical Dictionary, I find this line much more interesting. I say this as the excerpt explains the myth behind Hyacinthus, and how when Hyacinthus was killed by Apollo, he was transformed into the hyacinth flower. Pair this with the explanation of the festival in which their are two days reserved for grieving Hyacinthus and I think that this clearly connects to the beginning of the poem. I say this as the lines "April is the cruellest month, breeding lilacs out of the dead land, mixing memory and desire." display how the rebirth of flowers and the spring season brings about memories of the dead. Thus, a connection is formed between how april is the cruellest month, and Hyacinth flowers both bring about memories of the dead, even if they should be signs of new life and rebirth.

! In the end, she accepts the parts of her language and identity that she once tried to hide

• this supports her new belief that different voices and ways of speaking have value

• shows consequences of losing part of her bilingual literacy

! Her shift toward English creates distance between her and her mother

? Why does she care so much about approval from others, that it affects how she sees herself as a writer

! She follows the rules of writing but she feels like her personal voice is disappearing

• Example of different languages mixing while still communicating the same emotions

! Ideas about “correct” English are connected to race and power

? Why would people judge her literacy before considering her actual abilities

! Her identity and language background affected how she experienced english

This is important because college students are still building confidence and figuring out who they are. Negative labels can make that harder

This makes me question whether a timed writing test can really show how well someone writes

I like this because difficult work helped Brisa become more confident instead of making her feel less capable

If the students were doing college level work, why were they still being called remedial?

it shows how the students started to connect the word remedial with many negative ideas

! its interesting because Arturo used the negative label as motivation to work harder instead of giving up

This shows how one label can affect a student's confidence and feeling of belonging

I can understand why this word hurt Sonia. She was accepted in college, but the label made her question if she was good enough to be there.

This is important idea because the words a school uses can change how students see themselves

its surprised me because very large number of students was being labeled remedial. It makes me question how accurate this test really is??

Shows that she realized it's not fun, but she has to do it.

Showing how people can struggle on getting the motivation to cook food because it may not work the way they had planned.

Shows how she struggled to cook because she couldn't afford to buy proper food, and she didn't have the food items because she had no desire to make food.

Comparing cooking to everyday chores makes her argument relatable. Enjoyment is not a requirement for doing something necessary.

This unfairly treats cooking habits as proof of someone’s values. It ignores things such as time, money, or experience.

This metaphor presents prepared food as an escape from work. Having enough money gives people the option to avoid cooking when exhausted.

The author challenges this stereotype with evidence about meal preparation.

Treating cooking as a chore removes the pressure to make every meal exciting. The author shows that something can be worth it without being enjoyable.

Cooking takes practice, and mistakes can waste food and money. Would affordable cooking classes help more than simply telling people to cook healthier meals?

This research challenges the idea that boxed meals save time.

Buying in bulk saves money per item, but it can leave too little for rent. The author shows how someone’s budget changes what counts as a smart purchase.

Instrumental Goal Inform boss im too unwell to come in to work. Reassure boss i have done the prep required for meeting and will arrange for a different intern to take over my duties.

Relational Goal Aim to maintain the current proffessional relationship by following any instructions/advice boss gives and answering any questions they have. Identity Goal I want to be efficient problem solver who despite not being able to work tommorow, has managed to keep control of the situation by arranging someone to cover my absence.

Dawkins says that the welfare system is as altruistic system which can be defined as a system as helping others without the expectation of it having reciprocated. Dawkins states that this type of system is inherently unstable because of its vulnerability to selfish individuals. I agree that purely altruistic systems may be vulnerable to exploitation, our welfare system in current day is not purely on a trust based system but instead regulated by government and higher authority to ensure that they are not being exploited. This also made me think about the flaws of our welfare system such as unemployment insurance (EI) and subsidized housing and how difficult it is to really use those things. Is it too regulated?

I thought that the experiment with the mice was really interesting when exploring birth rates and population growth in relation to food scarcity. The worlds population is bigger than it is has veer been and continues to grow, though less rampant than in past decades. I wonder if the population increase will continue to slow does in the coming years and decades like what happened with the mice, or will people continue to have babies at the rate they are now despite depleting resources?

I like how people actually worked to implement things that would help based off of concerns that were brought to their attention.

This is a very good point. It's an acute challenge in solo games when interpreting random results but it's something we naturally do when we've got the momentum already. We naturally gravitate towards explanations of the random that makes sense in context. A one line stater give just that.

2

0

1

0

3

3

4

3

4

3

4

1

1

People who are comfortable with a task are able to feel more relaxed without having to turn to music to comfort/motivate them.

This makes me think about how noise rhythm can affect cognitive function.

Motivation can lead to better engagement.

I wonder if calming music without lyrics can disprove what these researchers claim.

Although there was a hypothesized paper written about the connection to music and learning, there has been no proven answer to if music actually helps or is just a distraction

Importante. Por eso se deben dejar siempre programadas curaciones si o si, se usen o no grapas.Actualmente, algunos crees que usando grapas, no se debe descubrir la herida quirurgica hasta que llegue el dia de su retiro; ERROR.

That risk aspect is one of the more important factors. Innovation is driven by risk in many ways. People will often be more productive than those who aren't permitted or do not feel permitted to deviate in any meaningful way.

This is important. I recall watching an Andrew Huberman video on neuroplasticity and learning that spoke on something similar.

A part of stepping out of the comfort zone involves failures and frustration. Specific brain chemicals are released that help change and modify those neurons and brain circuits.

The "comfort zone" is gradual, a new less-than comfort zone needs to be sought to maximize the ability to learn those hard and new things.

How to Learn Faster by Using Failures, Movement & Balance Huberman Lab Essentials https://youtu.be/jwChiek_aRY

This is interesting. A lot of learning comes from failure, and from failure often comes the outward perception of being in whole a failure.

Those who disregard this aspect of learning, should tend to excel in whatever they may be doing.

• Context & Motivation:

  • Following the MinIO company's decision to shift away from maintaining the open-source release, developers and demo creators needed alternative local S3 emulators.
  • The author's criteria focused strictly on single-node, local testing/demo environments: ready-to-use Docker images, S3 compatibility, open-source licensing (per OSI), simple configuration, and active community/backing.
  • Testing baseline used a minimal Docker Compose setup: DuckDB reading and writing Apache Iceberg data backed by local S3 storage.

• Evaluated Solutions:

  • S3Proxy:
    • Lightweight, highly compatible, and very easy to set up (👍👍).
    • Noted downside: Depends on Apache jclouds, which was retired to the Apache Attic in mid-2025.
  • RustFS:
    • Easy setup with an included GUI and strong S3 compliance (👍👍).
    • Drawbacks: Currently in alpha release and recently experienced a notable security vulnerability.
  • SeaweedFS:
    • Mature open-source project with solid S3 compatibility and a built-in UI (👍).
    • Slight initial hurdle regarding auth config files in Docker Compose, though the maintainer promptly pushed changes to streamline single-node setup.
  • Zenko CloudServer:
    • Formerly known as S3 Server (by Scality); straightforward replacement (👍).
    • Downsides include confusing branding across Scality/Zenko/CloudServer and outdated Docker Hub images referenced in documentation.
  • Garage:
    • Lightweight distributed-focused object store with an AGPL license.
    • Steep setup curve for simple single-node demos due to custom initialization, mandatory key ID format constraints, and external TOML configuration requirements (😬).
  • Apache Ozone & Ceph Object Gateway:
    • Deemed too heavyweight and complex for lightweight single-node demo stacks (Ozone required at least four nodes; Ceph required extensive setup).

• Author's Takeaway:

  • Recommended choices for local demos: SeaweedFS and S3Proxy (with RustFS as a potential future candidate once matured).
  • Reminded users to weigh project governance (foundation vs. single maintainer) and bus factor when selecting tools.

Hacker News Discussion

• MinIO Fork (pgsty/silo):
  • A prominent fork created by Ruohang Feng (originally pgsty/minio, renamed to pgsty/silo) was highlighted by multiple commenters as the most seamless drop-in replacement that requires zero config or code changes for existing MinIO users.
• VersityGW as a Popular Alternative:
  • Several users strongly recommended versitygw for homelabs and local testing, highlighting its stability and ability to map S3 buckets directly to standard POSIX directories without complex overhead.
• Garage Experience & Caveats:
  • Commenters noted that Garage v2.3.0 added a --single-node --default-bucket flag that significantly simplifies single-node setups compared to earlier versions.
  • However, technical drawbacks were emphasized: Garage relies on eventual consistency and lacks strict conditional PUT semantics, making it unsuitable for workloads like Apache Iceberg or Litestream-style lock guarantees.
• SeaweedFS Community Input:
  • The SeaweedFS maintainer actively participated in the thread, clarifying performance benchmarks, welcoming issue reports for concurrency or documentation gaps, and pointing to updated documentation and broad S3 feature coverage.
• Other Noteworthy Mentions:
  • HS5: A lightweight object store designed specifically for local S3 simulation with integrated DuckDB support and strict ETag / conditional request compliance.
  • Filestash S3 Gateway: Mentioned as a flexible proxy translating S3 requests across diverse backend storages (SFTP, SMB, NFS).
  • Incus: Noted that the LXD successor project recently adopted its own native S3 service to drop MinIO dependencies.

It is wild how much we live through in a lifetime. What we just see as passing events occurring in the world around us are actually rich and creating history. The very things we have watched happen around us are what the next generation will look at and learn from. These events that have changed and added to history bring a few questions to mind; what will the next generation take from what has occurred in our life time? Will there be many positive lessons or many things they will see and try to never repeat? With this I wonder what people of the past thought when specific events occurred. I wonder if huge events we now study in the classrooms were passive or normal to them?

I find It interesting that he accredits His family for making him the scholar that he is today. He doesn't simply attribute his accomplishments to his education or stature but rather those who helped form him. This made me think about the fact that families hold so much history and deeply shape and individuals life. Crediting his family as inspiration for his accomplishments is a form of history in the making, a small part of a family legacy. History is being formed all around us in both obvious and hidden ways.

History is living and relevant. When new issues or events in our world occur, it can spark a curiosity about the past and what has already occurred. History is an essential element to living well In the present and preparing us for a better future. Not only are we learning and growing now but we look to what has already occurred to inspire us and ignite a hope for what is to come. This book has not been updated to erase the events that have formed this culture, but rather this has been updated to better serve those reading it and inform the future generations that will use this source.

This is new, it's not that I recall it. We haven't covered it.

So far, for all phase shifts, I could determine that the given phase shift moves either to the right or the left without knowing which it truly is.

Minimum and Maximum for sinusoidal equations is new and needs to be explained.

Quater Points is something new. It needs explained.

Why wouldn't I use cos(x), it would be easier to identify the phase shift and period. Who wrote this? This section is a bust. I have no idea how you decided C=pi/5, why you used sin(x). I said y=cos(x), B=pi/5, and the phase shift was about 3.5 or 7/2. This gives a phase shift of C/B=(7/2)/(pi/5). What method are you using??

for y=cos(x), C=1, so the phase shift is C/B=1/(pi/2)=3/pi.

for y=cos(x), C=1, so the phase shift is C/B=1/(pi/2)=3/pi.

Exemplo Prático

1. O Julgamento e a Condenação Um réu é julgado pelo Júri por homicídio qualificado e condenado a 18 anos de prisão.

Pela regra geral (alínea e), o juiz mandaria prendê-lo imediatamente para começar a cumprir a pena na hora.

1. A Questão Substancial (O "Trunfo" da Defesa) Durante o julgamento, o advogado de defesa percebe que o promotor mostrou aos jurados um documento novo que não estava nos autos (o que é proibido pelo art. 479 do CPP). A defesa protestou na hora e registrou a nulidade na ata da sessão.

2. A Aplicação do § 3º A defesa recorre e pede ao Presidente do Tribunal de Justiça (ou ao relator) para não prender o réu enquanto a apelação é analisada:

Argumento: O julgamento teve uma nulidade gravíssima. A chance de o Tribunal anular esse júri por violação do devido processo legal é altíssima (questão substancial plausível).

A Decisão: O Presidente analisa o pedido e conclui: "Se eu mandar prender este réu agora, ele vai passar meses preso injustamente até o recurso ser julgado, sendo que este júri provavelmente será anulado por causa da prova ilegal."

Resultado: Com base no § 3º do art. 492, o Presidente deixa de autorizar a prisão imediata. O réu aguarda o julgamento da apelação em liberdade.

I believe the power of the writer's voice is very real and I love that this is talking directly about it.

Makes me think the ultimate goal may be to produce in high volume and quality when it comes to whether what you've written is to be kept

Reminds me to think about the process of thought, to act of writing, to having a completely written body whatever size it may be and the inherent amount of time it all requires (in relation to the speed of thought). Writing is always circular in its progression, a lot of revisiting things that will ultimately be removed, replaced, or otherwise revised.

Genuinely one of the most relatable things I've ever read. Personally I at least type the way I speak. The effort I put into simply articulating my thoughts as I believe they're not always in English, more like emotions with references to memories, makes the effort required to produce writing non stop seem monumental and the relief is real.

No feedback, pure word vomit in essence, complete with chunks of partially digested structures of wording that you entirely intend never to have anyone else handle or even witness as that is not the point, the point is production!

P.S. I grossed myself out

I'm always almost too keen on my composure and stamina when trying to write well that they're some of the first things to go out the window whenever I try this, especially for (what I'll call) "autopilot" exercises.

these visuals and data charts are great addition throughout

<3

!

Good summary of problem

Note parallels in France and Germany in terms of central bank policy

Notable re Peter Jay

Became the common wisdom

Here we are

Note this guarantee against exchange losses

Also notable, early version of "we do regime change better than the Americans"

Notable

Why is hispanic or latino not considered a race?

!

"siege" economy, example of the lack of proportion in the terminology used for even mildly heterodox policy alternatives

"a smaller demand on savings"

een manier van denken en waarnemen waarbij je hersenen informatie interpreteren op basis van je bestaande kennis, verwachtingen en ervaringen

een manier van informatieverwerking waarbij je hersenen beginnen met losse zintuiglijke prikkels uit de omgeving om zo tot een totaalbeeld te komen