- Apr 2021
-
-
But in all this incongruous abundance you'll certanly find the links to expect It's just what is wanted: the tool, which is traditionally used to communicate automatically with interactive programs. And as it always occurs, there is unfortunately a little fault in it: expect needs the programming language TCL to be present. Nevertheless if it doesn't discourage you to install and learn one more, though very powerful language, then you can stop your search, because expect and TCL with or without TK have everything and even more for you to write scripts.
-
-
githooks.com githooks.com
-
Figure out which project(s) to use at the Bank.
-
-
medium.com medium.com
-
“Who cares? Let’s just go with the style-guide” — to which my response is that caring about the details is in the heart of much of our doings. Yes, this is not a major issue; def self.method is not even a code smell. Actually, that whole debate is on the verge of being incidental. Yet the learning process and the gained knowledge involved in understanding each choice is alone worth the discussion. Furthermore, I believe that the class << self notation echoes a better, more stable understanding of Ruby and Object Orientation in Ruby. Lastly, remember that style-guides may change or be altered (carefully, though!).
-
-
store.steampowered.com store.steampowered.com
-
Micromachines always focused on local multiplayer, and the fun their eccentric races of small toy vehicles competing on tracks made with everyday objects; and all that is present.
-
-
store.steampowered.com store.steampowered.com
-
There's probably a thousand different directions you can go, but there just needs to be some kind of deeper hook to make this a full-fledged game.
-
-
code.visualstudio.com code.visualstudio.com
-
Show/hide output and metadata differences in the diff editor
-
-
github.com github.com
-
This approach is preferable to overriding authenticate_user! in your controller because it won't clobber a lot of "behind the scenes" stuff Devise does (such as storing the attempted URL so the user can be redirected after successful sign in).
-
-
github.com github.com
-
# +devise_for+ is meant to play nicely with other routes methods. For example, # by calling +devise_for+ inside a namespace, it automatically nests your devise # controllers: # # namespace :publisher do # devise_for :account # end
-
-
github.com github.com
-
find_field finds by id, name or placeholder text - so find_field('Prefix') should find the element with matching placeholder text rather than needing xpath.
-
-
sfdictionary.com sfdictionary.com
-
Poke around!
-
- Mar 2021
-
bugs.ruby-lang.org bugs.ruby-lang.org
-
Would it be desirable to specify the new object in a block? That would make it somewhat symmetrical to how Hash.new takes a block as a default value.
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
This should link to / explain the relationship to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_(computer_programming) (which I believe is a way of expressing / codifying semantic classes into source code).
It should also link to / explain the relationship to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_theory
-
(Not answered on this stub article)
What, precisely, is the distinction/difference between a semantic class and a semantic field? At the very least, you would say that they are themselves both very much within the same semantic field.
So, is a semantic class distinct from a semantic field in that semantic class is a more well-defined/clear-cut semantic field? And a semantic field is a more fluid, nebulous, not well-defined field (in the same sense as a magnetic field, which has no distinct boundary whatsoever, only a decay as you move further away from its source) ("semantic fields are constantly flowing into each other")?
If so, could you even say that a semantic class is a kind of (hyponym) of semantic field?
Maybe I should pose this question on a semantics forum.
-
-
trailblazer.to trailblazer.to
-
This could be an operation, a workflow, or hand-baked Ruby code completely unrelated to Trailblazer.
-
-
www.smashingmagazine.com www.smashingmagazine.com
-
CSS Grid Layout Generator
Give these a try.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Take this for a spin.
-
-
netflixtechblog.com netflixtechblog.com
-
a Docker container running a very simple NodeJS web server with the Graphile library (and some additional Netflix internal components for security, logging, metrics, and monitoring) could provide a “better REST than REST” or “REST++” platform for rapid development efforts
Give this a try.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
results.vote.wa.gov results.vote.wa.gov
-
results.vote.wa.gov results.vote.wa.gov
-
- Get out the city shapefile and overlay these values.
- Get the most current version of the voter registration database.
- Determine the number of voters who, according to the Spokane Journal of Business, took part in the 2018 school bond vote, but not the stadium advisory vote. (Geographically, these would be folks who live within SD81, but outside of the city limits.)
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Meh... as I said earlier, I think using Webpack is the recommended way now. Another issue is there is no way to generate source maps in production.
-
But yeah, I'm not sure how you would determine which was the "recommended way" really. I don't see anything in Rails docs saying either way.
-
But last I have seen comments from DHH, he considered webpack(er) recommended for JS, but Sprockets still the preferred solution for (S)CSS.
-
Is there a PR to... something? sassc-rails? That would make the patch not necessary? (I don't know if there's any good way to monkey-patch that in, I think you have to fork? So some change seems required...) Should the defaults be different somehow? This is very difficult to figure out.
Tags
- where (which project) do I even report this problem/bug? (whose responsibility is it?)
- official preferred convention / way to do something
- switching/migrating from Sprockets to Webpack (Rails)
- possible response/reaction to lack of maintainance / maintainer absence/silence
- is anyone even still using it anymore?
- hard to figure out where the problem lies / how to solve the problem / where to even begin
Annotators
URL
-
-
github.com github.com
-
but I still have no idea if I'm writing this new file correctly.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
we want source maps in production (like DHH)
-
After waiting years for sprockets to support this we were very happy to see that sprockets 4 officially added support (thanks ), but then when trying to upgrade we noticed there's actually no way to use it in production... (without brittle hacks mentioned above).
-
-
css-tricks.com css-tricks.com
-
always use real <label for="correct_input"> elements. Just that alone is a UX consideration all too many forms fail on
-
-
tylergaw.com tylergaw.com
-
This is a non-exhaustive list of other things I love;
-
-
jangawolof.org jangawolof.orgPhrases1
-
Beykat yi duñu dem tool altine.
-
-
www.digitalocean.com www.digitalocean.com
-
Wire this up for Brennan's website, so that I can protect the upload portal.
-
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
-
www.lavenderandlovage.com www.lavenderandlovage.com
-
trailblazer.to trailblazer.to
-
Hey, that’s is an imaginary complication of our example - please don’t do this with every condition you have in your app.
-
- Feb 2021
-
github.com github.com
-
URI::MailTo::EMAIL_REGEXP
First time I've seen someone create a validator by simply matching against
URI::MailTo::EMAIL_REGEXP
from std lib. More often you see people copying and pasting some really long regex that they don't understand and is probably not loose enough. It's much better, though, to simply reuse a standard one from a library — by reference, rather than copying and pasting!!
-
-
trailblazer.to trailblazer.to
-
For branching out a separate path in an activity, use the Path() macro. It’s a convenient, simple way to declare alternative routes
Seems like this would be a very common need: once you switch to a custom failure track, you want it to stay on that track until the end!!!
The problem is that in a Railway, everything automatically has 2 outputs. But we really only need one (which is exactly what Path gives us). And you end up fighting the defaults when there are the automatic 2 outputs, because you have to remember to explicitly/verbosely redirect all of those outputs or they may end up going somewhere you don't want them to go.
The default behavior of everything going to the next defined step is not helpful for doing that, and in fact is quite frustrating because you don't want unrelated steps to accidentally end up on one of the tasks in your custom failure track.
And you can't use
fail
for custom-track steps becase that breaksmagnetic_to
for some reason.I was finding myself very in need of something like this, and was about to write my own DSL, but then I discovered this. I still think it needs a better DSL than this, but at least they provided a way to do this. Much needed.
For this example, I might write something like this:
step :decide_type, Output(Activity::Left, :credit_card) => Track(:with_credit_card) # Create the track, which would automatically create an implicit End with the same id. Track(:with_credit_card) do step :authorize step :charge end
I guess that's not much different than theirs. Main improvement is it avoids ugly need to specify end_id/end_task.
But that wouldn't actually be enough either in this example, because you would actually want to have a failure track there and a path doesn't have one ... so it sounds like Subprocess and a new self-contained ProcessCreditCard Railway would be the best solution for this particular example... Subprocess is the ultimate in flexibility and gives us all the flexibility we need)
But what if you had a path that you needed to direct to from 2 different tasks' outputs?
Example: I came up with this, but it takes a lot of effort to keep my custom path/track hidden/"isolated" and prevent other tasks from automatically/implicitly going into those steps:
class Example::ValidationErrorTrack < Trailblazer::Activity::Railway step :validate_model, Output(:failure) => Track(:validation_error) step :save, Output(:failure) => Track(:validation_error) # Can't use fail here or the magnetic_to won't work and Track(:validation_error) won't work step :log_validation_error, magnetic_to: :validation_error, Output(:success) => End(:validation_error), Output(:failure) => End(:validation_error) end
puts Trailblazer::Developer.render o Reloading... #<Start/:default> {Trailblazer::Activity::Right} => #<Trailblazer::Activity::TaskBuilder::Task user_proc=validate_model> #<Trailblazer::Activity::TaskBuilder::Task user_proc=validate_model> {Trailblazer::Activity::Left} => #<Trailblazer::Activity::TaskBuilder::Task user_proc=log_validation_error> {Trailblazer::Activity::Right} => #<Trailblazer::Activity::TaskBuilder::Task user_proc=save> #<Trailblazer::Activity::TaskBuilder::Task user_proc=save> {Trailblazer::Activity::Left} => #<Trailblazer::Activity::TaskBuilder::Task user_proc=log_validation_error> {Trailblazer::Activity::Right} => #<End/:success> #<Trailblazer::Activity::TaskBuilder::Task user_proc=log_validation_error> {Trailblazer::Activity::Left} => #<End/:validation_error> {Trailblazer::Activity::Right} => #<End/:validation_error> #<End/:success> #<End/:validation_error> #<End/:failure>
Now attempt to do it with Path... Does the Path() have an ID we can reference? Or maybe we just keep a reference to the object and use it directly in 2 different places?
class Example::ValidationErrorTrack::VPathHelper1 < Trailblazer::Activity::Railway validation_error_path = Path(end_id: "End.validation_error", end_task: End(:validation_error)) do step :log_validation_error end step :validate_model, Output(:failure) => validation_error_path step :save, Output(:failure) => validation_error_path end
o=Example::ValidationErrorTrack::VPathHelper1; puts Trailblazer::Developer.render o Reloading... #<Start/:default> {Trailblazer::Activity::Right} => #<Trailblazer::Activity::TaskBuilder::Task user_proc=validate_model> #<Trailblazer::Activity::TaskBuilder::Task user_proc=validate_model> {Trailblazer::Activity::Left} => #<Trailblazer::Activity::TaskBuilder::Task user_proc=log_validation_error> {Trailblazer::Activity::Right} => #<Trailblazer::Activity::TaskBuilder::Task user_proc=save> #<Trailblazer::Activity::TaskBuilder::Task user_proc=log_validation_error> {Trailblazer::Activity::Right} => #<End/:validation_error> #<Trailblazer::Activity::TaskBuilder::Task user_proc=save> {Trailblazer::Activity::Left} => #<Trailblazer::Activity::TaskBuilder::Task user_proc=log_validation_error> {Trailblazer::Activity::Right} => #<End/:success> #<End/:success> #<End/:validation_error> #<End/:failure>
It's just too bad that:
- there's not a Railway helper in case you want multiple outputs, though we could probably create one pretty easily using Path as our template
- we can't "inline" a separate Railway acitivity (Subprocess "nests" it rather than "inlines")
-
step :direct_debit
I don't think we would/should really want to make this the "success" (Right) path and :credit_card be the "failure" (Left) track.
Maybe it's okay to repurpose Left and Right for something other than failure/success ... but only if we can actually change the default semantic of those signals/outputs. Is that possible? Maybe there's a way to override or delete the default outputs?
-
Patching has no implicit, magical side-effects and is strongly encouraged to customize flows for a specific case in a quick and consise way.
-
While you could nest an activity into another manually, the Subprocess macro will come in handy.
-
The macro automatically wires all of Validate’s ends to the known counter-part tracks.
Tags
- trailblazer-activity
- side effects
- leverage library/tool to do something for you
- automatic
- semantics
- I have a question about this
- helper functions
- verbose / noisy / too much boilerplate
- extension API: patching
- feels wrong
- macro
- concise
- example: not how you would actually do it (does something wrong/bad/nonideal illustrating but we should overlook it because that's not the one thing the example is trying to illustrate/show us)
- example: in order to keep example concise/focused, may not implement all best practices (illustrates one thing only)
- tip
- powerful
- official preferred convention / way to do something
- flexibility
- no magic
- monkey patching
- useful
- good abstraction
Annotators
URL
-
-
github.com github.com
-
It's recommended to configure this library by setting environment variables.
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
despite initially appearing to be an appropriate and effective response to a problem, has more bad consequences than good ones
-
-
www.morozov.is www.morozov.is
-
Do notation provides an alternative to bind, which also flattens the code.
-
-
www.huffpost.com www.huffpost.com
-
They do not maintain a to-do list (mentally or physically).
-
If you ask my former students, they will tell you that as a teacher, my goal is to do nothing. I dream of the day when I can sit at my desk, feet propped up, reading a book, while the classroom bursts with activity and learning around me.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
While Trailblazer offers you abstraction layers for all aspects of Ruby On Rails, it does not missionize you. Wherever you want, you may fall back to the "Rails Way" with fat models, monolithic controllers, global helpers, etc. This is not a bad thing, but allows you to step-wise introduce Trailblazer's encapsulation in your app without having to rewrite it.
Tags
- leaving the details of implementation/integration up to you
- focus on concepts/design/structure instead of specific/concrete technology/implementation
- Trailblazer
- rails: the Rails way
- allowing developer/user to pick and choose which pieces to use (allowing use with competing libraries; not being too opinionated; not forcing recommended way on you)
- making changes / switching/migrating gradually/incrementally/step-wise/iteratively
- newer/better ways of doing things
- focus on what it should do, not on how it should do it (implementation details; software design)
- abstractions
- freedom of user to override specific decision of an authority/vendor (software)
Annotators
URL
-
-
trailblazer.to trailblazer.to
-
The new 2.1 version comes with a few necessary but reasonable changes in method signatures. As painful as that might sound to your Rails-spoiled ears, we preferred to fix design mistakes now before dragging them on forever.
Tags
- do it right/well the first time because it may be too hard to clean up/fix later if you don't
- learn from your mistakes
- fix design/API mistakes as early as you can (since it will be more difficult to correct it and make a breaking change later)
- pointing out gaps/downsides/cons in competition/alternatives
Annotators
URL
-
-
github.com github.com
-
ActiveModel provides a powerful framework for defining callbacks. ActiveInteraction hooks into that framework to allow hooking into various parts of an interaction's lifecycle.
-
-
every.to every.to
-
Personal todo lists don’t depend on others using the same system (no network effects)
They don't unless you're building a wiki or commonplace book that can interact with those of others. (Roam research isn't doing this---yet, but they should.) Ideally small building block pieces will allow it to dovetail with other systems that could potentially do the same thing.
-
-
-
{a: 1, b: 2, c: 3, d: 4} => {a:, b:, **rest} # a == 1, b == 2, rest == {:c=>3, :d=>4}
equivalent in javascript:
{a, b, ...rest} = {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3, d: 4}
Not a bad replacement for that! I still find javascript's syntax a little more easily readable and natural, but given that we can't use the same syntax (probably because it would be incompatible with existing syntax rules that we can't break for compatibility reasons, unfortunately), this is a pretty good compromise/solution that they've come up with.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Examples of different ways of defining forms
Wow, that's a lot of different ways.
The inline_form way in particular seems interesting to me, though it's worth noting that that method is just an example, not actually part of this project's code, so it's not really a first-class option like the other options.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
The assert method is used by all the other assertions. It pushes the second parameter to the list of errors if the first parameter evaluates to false or nil.
Seems like these helper functions could be just as easily used in ActiveRecord models. Therefore, they should be in a separate gem, or at least module, that can be used in both these objects and ActiveRecord objects.
-
-
softwareengineering.stackexchange.com softwareengineering.stackexchange.com
-
The more important point comes from a program design perspective. Here, "programming to an interface" means focusing your design on what the code is doing, not how it does it. This is a vital distinction that pushes your design towards correctness and flexibility.
-
-
-
DSLs can be problematic for the user since the user has to manage state (e.g. am I supposed to call valid? first or update_attributes?). This is exactly why the #validate is the only method to change state in Reform.
-
The reason Reform does updating attributes and validation in the same step is because I wanna reduce public methods. This is to save users from having to remember state.
I see what he means, but what would you call this (tag)? "have to remember state"? maybe "have to remember" is close enough
Or maybe order is important / do things in the right order is all we need to describe the problem/need.
-
-
-
Writing the uniqueness validations yourself is easy so I felt it was better to leave this up to the developer
-
-
www.dell.com www.dell.com
-
This is what seems to be happening to me as well! It's maddening.
-
-
harriman-house.com harriman-house.com
-
p. 217:
We also keep a higher percentage of our assets in cash than most financial advisors would recommend --- something around 20% of the value of our assets outside the value of our house.
Compare this to my current allotment.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.metacritic.com www.metacritic.com
-
Yes, you do face difficult choices (moral) but you don't care about it. All you care are the reputation bars. So... Let's kill this guy, who cares if he is innocent, but this faction needs it or I'm dead. Sounds great on paper but to be honest... you just sit there and do whatever for these reputation bars. If you won't, then you lose
-
- Jan 2021
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
systemd has such huge documentation. systemd.unit Did you try searching for explanation yourself? What did you find?
-
-
blog.linuxmint.com blog.linuxmint.com
-
http://letmegooglethat.com/?q=How+to+change+the+default+search+engine+in+chromium&l=1
-
-
github.com github.com
-
I want to write my own scripts first, but may end up graduating to this.
-
-
css-tricks.com css-tricks.com
-
overflow-wrap: break-word; makes sure the long string will wrap and not bust out of the container. You might as well use word-wrap as well because as the spec says, they are literally just alternate names for each other. Some browsers support one and not the other.
-
-
forums.theregister.com forums.theregister.com
-
Flatpak as a truly cross-distro application solution that works equally well and non-problematic for all
-
-
www.americanpressinstitute.org www.americanpressinstitute.org
-
The purpose of news is to inform, educate, and give us understanding and knowledge of what is going on in the world. It helps us to keep up to date with issues so we are in the know and fully aware of events taking place.
-
-
-
Moving DOM elements around made me anxious and I wanted to preserve natural tab order without resorting to setting tabindex, so I also made a flexbox version that never moves DOM elements around. I think it's the superior solution, at least for the layouts I was going for. https://github.com/wickning1/svelte-components/blob/master/src/FlexCardLayout.svelte
-
-
marketplace.visualstudio.com marketplace.visualstudio.com
-
-
www.donielsmith.com www.donielsmith.com
-
Depending on what other component libraries you’ve used, you may be used to handling events by passing callback functions to component properties, or using a special event syntax – Svelte supports both, though one is usually more appropriate than the other depending on your situation. This post explains both ways.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
You should default to the most permissive option imo and there really is no reason to check anything until you really need to If it were left to me I'd just use optional chaining, as it also eliminates the need for no-ops
(lazy checking)
-
-
atomiks.github.io atomiks.github.io
-
"Headless Tippy" refers to Tippy without any of the default element rendering or CSS. This allows you to create your own element from scratch and use Tippy for its logic only.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
A cleaner approach could be the use:action API.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Popper for Svelte with actions, no wrapper components or component bindings required! Other Popper libraries for Svelte (including the official @popperjs/svelte library) use a wrapper component that takes the required DOM elements as props. Not only does this require multiple bind:this, you also have to pollute your script tag with multiple DOM references. We can do better with Svelte actions!
-
-
docs.docker.com docs.docker.com
-
I'd like to spin up a couple of these, both for my personal box (
localhost
-only) and for the development network.
-
- Dec 2020
-
-
Add this to my toolchain (in particular, configure Lighthouse to run in our CI/CD pipeline).
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
docs.microsoft.com docs.microsoft.com
-
I really want to wire this up to our heavy-duty internal apps, like CI, Disputes, and NoteRequest.
-
-
docs.microsoft.com docs.microsoft.com
-
you can set up notifications to alert you to new recommendations
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Jbuilder gives you a simple DSL for declaring JSON structures that beats manipulating giant hash structures. This is particularly helpful when the generation process is fraught with conditionals and loops.
-
-
developer.mozilla.org developer.mozilla.org
-
The Web Storage API provides mechanisms by which browsers can store key/value pairs, in a much more intuitive fashion than using cookies.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
I guess it's about "preloading" and not "navigation", if it's the case, then I guess there is still no way to attach to navigation events, and this issue should be kept open.
-
No JS event is fired, so there currently isn't any clean way to do this that I can see.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
I tried leaking session and page data and indeed it's easy. Too easy. So I definitely agree that session data should not be readable from anywhere but the request itself.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Like JSON.stringify, but handles
-
-
github.com github.com
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
github.com github.com
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.npmjs.com www.npmjs.com
-
You can afford to make a proper PR to upstream.
-
No more waiting around for pull requests to be merged and published. No more forking repos just to fix that one tiny thing preventing your app from working.
This could be both good and bad.
potential downside: If people only fix things locally, then they may be less inclined/likely to actually/also submit a merge request, and therefore it may be less likely that this actually (ever) gets fixed upstream. Which is kind of ironic, considering the stated goal "No more waiting around for pull requests to be merged and published." But if this obviates the need to create a pull request (does it), then this could backfire / work against that goal.
Requiring someone to fork a repo and push up a fix commit -- although a little extra work compared to just fixing locally -- is actually a good thing overall, for the community/ecosystem.
Ah, good, I see they touched on some of these points in the sections:
- Benefits of patching over forking
- When to fork instead
Tags
- doing it right/properly
- making it easy to do the wrong thing
- pull request
- pull request stalled
- irony
- forking (patching vs. forking)
- proper
- taking the time to do it right/properly
- forking to add a desired missing feature/change
- maintaining a fork while waiting for upstream to merge
- when to _
- limited time: not right now (maybe later)
Annotators
URL
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Some devs prefer Svelte’s minimal approach that defers problems to userland, encouraging more innovation, choice, and fragmentation, and other devs prefer a more fully integrated toolkit with a well-supported happy path.
tag?: what scope of provided features / recommended happy path is needed?
-
It’s worth mentioning that Svelte limits its scope to being only a UI component framework. Like React, it provides the view layer, but it has more batteries included with its component-scoped CSS and extensible stores for state management. Others like Angular and Vue provide a more all-in-one solution with official routers, opinionated state management, CLIs, and more. Sapper is Svelte’s official app framework that adds routing, server-side rendering, code splitting, and some other essential app features, but it has no opinions about state management and beyond. Some devs prefer Svelte’s minimal approach that defers problems to userland, encouraging more innovation, choice, and fragmentation, and other devs prefer a more fully integrated toolkit with a well-supported happy path.
tag?: what scope of provided features / recommended happy path is needed?
-
It’s worth mentioning that Svelte limits its scope to being only a UI component framework. Like React, it provides the view layer, but it has more batteries included with its component-scoped CSS and extensible stores for state management.
-
-
developer.mozilla.org developer.mozilla.org
-
If you'd prefer, you can use a third-party library like Modernizr or Detect It to do this test for you.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
I think the main difference between the two are the way API are served. Some smelte components need you to input big chunk of json as props, while i prefer keep props as primitive types and in the other hand give you different components tags to compose.
-
-
implicit.harvard.edu implicit.harvard.edu
-
I'd really like to take this.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
yalebooks.yale.edu yalebooks.yale.edu
-
p. 198:
Given any five points on a sphere, show that some four of them lie on a hemisphere that includes its boundary.
I'll admit, I already looked at the hint for this problem, and yes, my initial approach did indeed consist of trying to find the 'worst' configuration.
I can think of two ways to determine whether or not two points on a sphere lie within the same hemisphere:
- First off, since any two points on a sphere may be connected by a great circle, they're in the same hemisphere if they're separated by no more than \(\frac{\tau}{2}\) radians along this shortest path.
- Equivalently, the length of the line segment connecting them must be less than or equal to \(2r\), where \(r\) is the radius of the sphere.
One other note:
- It's always possible to divide the sphere in half in such a way that any two points lie within the same hemisphere. (This is a corollary of the first point, above. Note that two antipodal points must necessarily fall on the boundary of such a division.)
So, I have a picture in my mind of the sphere divided into eight regions of equal area by way of three great circles which intersect one another at right angles. (Think the Equator, the Prime Meridian, and a third great circle drawn through the poles at 90 degrees longitude.) My thinking now tends more toward combinatorics and the pigeonhole principle than geometry proper.
-
-
register.gotowebinar.com register.gotowebinar.com
-
www.joshwcomeau.com www.joshwcomeau.com
-
- Nov 2020
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
delete myObject.regex; // or, delete myObject['regex']; // or, var prop = "regex"; delete myObject[prop];
-
-
www.686.com www.686.com
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
timdeschryver.dev timdeschryver.dev
-
Svelte makes the pit of success larger because it hides all of this from us at compile time.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
-
Another difference is that context in Svelte does not insert anything into the visual component tree. There is no <Context.Provider> element like in React
Tags
- port from another language
- React
- Svelte: context
- port (adaptation/translation)
- react: context
- Svelte
- +0.9
- react hooks
- component tree
- better/superior solution/way to do something
- examples
- comparison
- equivalent/analogous/alternative ways to do something between 2 libraries/languages/etc.
Annotators
URL
-
-
nbdev.fast.ai nbdev.fast.ai
-
I'd love to take this for a spin. Maybe I could rewrite Demeter or
micdrop
using it.
-
-
-
So handling the interop upfront will avoid users writing invalid ES6 and make sure that they write ES6 that loads CommonJS in the right way.
-
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
If everyone did this, the repair shops would be out of business.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
-
button.dev button.dev
-
i like working on application frameworks, compilers, interpreters, and emulators.
-
-
jimmy.schementi.com jimmy.schementi.com
-
but know I know what I don't want to do. I definitely know I want to be an Engineer now, and it makes it more clear that I should start my own business.
-
-
imfeld.dev imfeld.dev
-
Converting Angular components into Svelte is largely a mechanical process. For the most part, each Angular template feature has a direct corollary in Svelte. Some things are simpler and some are more complex but overall it's pretty easy to do.
-
-
docs.microsoft.com docs.microsoft.com
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
can you not also use a .babelrc?
-
-
github.com github.com
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Obviously we shouldn't rush into anything. But changes like these are best made earlier on in a project's lifecycle, so I'm eager to hear what people think so that we can start making some progress.
-
-
-
Some of the verbs implemented by systemctl are designed to provide a high-level overview in a human readable format. All that information is available over dbus, and/or journalctl, systemctl show. We could provide that information in json format, but there's a second problem. Information and format of information printed by e.g. systemctl status is not stable. Since the output is not suitable for programmatic consumption anyway, there's no need to provide it in a machine readable format.
-
In principle, this information is already available through other means, but it is actually a fair amount of work to gather it in this form, and I think it could be useful to open it up to programmatic consumption.
-
Although I agree that -o json should return proper JSON, believe the proper way for external tools like SaltStack etc. to talk to systemd is DBus. See also saltstack/salt#20392 - everything else is more or less just hack-ish and prone to break easily.
-
- Oct 2020
-
docs.microsoft.com docs.microsoft.com
-
I'll want to generate, upload, and store a certificate for publishing NuGet packages.
-
-
www.typelit.io www.typelit.io
-
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
If you have a better/simpler/"more official" solution, I'd still love to see it!
The "official" solution is to use submitErrors (see Erik's answer).
-
is this solution considered a hack or is something that we can use as an approved workaround in scenarios where we need to manually trigger validations?
-
The more official way to do this would be to run the check (you could even reuse this.validate) in onSubmit.
-
-
www.basefactor.com www.basefactor.com
-
Focus on your application: forget about forms details like I'm dirty, field touched...
-
You can try to build a solution to tackle these issues on your own, but it will cost you time and money... why not use a battle-tested solution to handle all this complexity?
-
If you want to implement a form with a superb User Experience, you have to take care of many variables:
-
Form validation can get complex (synchronous validations, asynchronous validations, record validations, field validations, internationalization, schemas definitions...). To cope with these challenges we will leverage this into Fonk and Fonk Final Form adaptor for a React Final Form seamless integration.
-
Managing Form State (holding field information, check if a control has been touched, if the user has clicked the submit button, who owns the current focus...) can be tedious and prone to errors. We can get help from React Final Form to handle these challenges for us.
Tags
- difficult/hard problem
- integration
- user experience
- fonk (form validation library)
- form validation library
- a lot of things to consider
- form design
- too hard/difficult/much work to expect end-developers to write from scratch (need library to do it for them)
- complexity
- adapter
- can't keep entire system in your mind at once (software development) (scope too large)
- tedious
- form validation
- react-final-form
- reinventing the wheel / not invented here
- don't write your own
- easy to get wrong
Annotators
URL
-
-
-
But it sounds like the library could use some way to setTouched()
-
-
graphql-dotnet.github.io graphql-dotnet.github.io
-
I highly recommend setting a higher bound on the number of returned entities by each resolve function in your code.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
-
-
Any software that makes HTTP requests to other sites should make it straightforward to enable the use of a cache.
-
-
final-form.org final-form.org
-
Wondering how to get field state from multiple fields at once? People coming from Redux-Form might be wondering where the equivalent of Redux Form's Fields component is, as a way to get state from several fields at once. The answer is that it's not included in the library because it's so easy to write one recursively composing Field components together.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Use ponyfill.com for linking here.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
humanwhocodes.com humanwhocodes.com
-
Once again, this isn’t good or bad, it’s just the most efficient way to create something that is similar to something else
-
-
-
I'm okay with an overall design that allows people to plugin the parts they need in order to be able to generically support a compile-to-javascript language, but to bake in support for one singular solution because its popular is simply bad engineering.
-
Of all the compile-to-languages, the one that strikes me as having the least merit is JSX. It's basically a ton of added complexity for the sake of what boils down to syntax. There are no real gains in terms of language semantics in JSX.
-
Furthermore, JSX encourages bad non-dry code. Having seen a lot of JSX over the past few months, its encourages copypasta coding.
Tags
- can't do everything
- making it easy to do the wrong thing
- not enough advantages/merits/pros to make it worthwhile
- special cases
- plugins
- do pros outweigh/cover cons?
- advantages/merits/pros
- minimal benefits
- duplication
- hard to make it work in _all_ cases
- favoring/catering to the needs of … over …
- extensibility
- bad engineering
- is it worth the effort?
- making it easy to do the right thing
- not merited
- can't support everything / all cases
- making it too easy to do the wrong thing
- encourages the wrong thing
- copy and paste
- adding special cases only for certain popular things but not others
- JSX
- copy and paste programming
- have a good reason
Annotators
URL
-
-
github.com github.com
-
For event listeners we support the standard jsx naming convention onEventname (this is converted to on:eventname in svelte) as well.
-
-
developer.mozilla.org developer.mozilla.org
-
An onevent event handler property serves as a placeholder of sorts, to which a single event handler can be assigned. In order to allow multiple handlers to be installed for the same event on a given object, you can call its addEventListener() method, which manages a list of handlers for the given event on the object.
-
-
-
An alternative (maybe not good) would be to restrict {@const} to certain blocks like {#each} and {#if}. In both cases, it significantly reduces the "multiple ways to do the same thing" problem and avoids ergonomic and performance overhead of our current situation.
-
it also allows for more divergence in how people write there code and where they put their logic, making different svelte codebases potentially even more different due to fewer constraints. This last point is actually something I really value, I read a lot of Svelte code by a lot of different people and broadly speaking things look the same and are in the same places.
Tags
- strong conventions resulting in code from different code bases/developers looking very similar
- software development: code organization: where does this code belong?
- idiomatic pattern (in library/framework)
- consistency
- programming: multiple ways to do the same thing
- idiomatic code style (programming languages)
- convention
- uniformity
Annotators
URL
-
-
svelte.dev svelte.dev
-
This is the Svelte version of this example: https://codesandbox.io/s/reactivity-react-responds-to-changing-props-forked-d2j44?file=/src/Label.js
-
-
nginx.org nginx.org
-
Hannah Stepanek annotated the hell out of this reference. I would do well to read what she had to say.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
github.com github.com
-
They even named the main file
react.js
so when converting/migrating components from React you could (at least some of the time, perhaps) simply leave some of the imports as-is:import {createHooks, useRef} from './react';
-
-
github.com github.com
-
It provides several capabilities that are difficult to achieve with React alone, while being compatible with the newest features of React.
-
-
recoiljs.org recoiljs.org
-
For reasons of compatibility and simplicity, it's best to use React's built-in state management capabilities rather than external global state.
-
-
dylanvann.com dylanvann.com
-
I’d still be interested in Svelte making things easier so I’ve opened a feature request for Reactive statement cleanup functions.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
I'm not sure I understand the problem, everything you are describing is already possible.
-
-
rjlipton.wordpress.com rjlipton.wordpress.com
-
A “solution” to GR is more like a model in logic: it may satisfy a theory’s axioms but have other properties that are contingent (unless the theory is categorical, meaning that all of its models are isomorphic).
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Solid supports templating in 3 forms JSX, Tagged Template Literals, and Solid's HyperScript variant.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Might have to cut my own version of the extension if its maintainers won't add support.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
-
It was clear no one was interested in what I was working towards.
-
but everything they were doing started to make sense
Tags
- finally got it right
- common/shared goal
- having a clear vision in mind / goal you're working towards even if no one else seems to understand/be interested
- constant evolution/improvement of software/practices/solutions
- build your own ideas
- better/superior solution/way to do something
- feels natural
- needs to feel right
- finally / at last
- can we do even better?
Annotators
URL
-
-
-
The $: can also be used to trigger effects.
-
We can run effects when some data changes using watchEffect - it takes a function that runs whenever a reactive value used inside changes.
-
MobX - for me personally MobX is a far better way to manage state than React Hooks. It doesn't care about the UI layer so it can be used outside the React ecosystem, and it's simple to mutate data.
-
-
www.thingiverse.com www.thingiverse.com
-
-
neilkakkar.com neilkakkar.com
-
Confidence to express ignorance is a super power. One good way I hone this skill is by saying “Nothing to add” when I have nothing to add, instead of repeating what other people said.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
This library exports a single React Hook, useMethods, which has all the power of useReducer but none of the ceremony that comes with actions and dispatchers.
-
-
moodle.unbc.ca moodle.unbc.ca
-
r self-r
This paragraph discuses the use of the word "bullshit" as it is used in every day life. Decide whether this is arguement, structure or both.
-
A Kind Word for Bullshit: The Problem of Academic Writin
Add MLA citation
-
-
leanprover.github.io leanprover.github.ioLean1
-
I'm so tempted to toy around with this.
-
- Sep 2020
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
do I really have to do something like that in order to have my local modules working? it's quite impracticable to explain it to a team! there's nothing a little bit more straightforward?
-
-
sapper.svelte.dev sapper.svelte.dev
-
page components can have an optional preload function that will load some data that the page depends on. This is similar to getInitialProps in Next.js or asyncData in Nuxt.js.
-
-
shipshape.io shipshape.io
-
medium.com medium.com
-
The benefit of this approach is that rather than having these defaults and fighting against them, it’s fully up to you to decide how to handle everything.
-
Unfortunately, many third party libraries, even though they are written in ESM, are published to npm as CJS modules, so we still need to concatenate them.
Tags
- it's up to you to decide
- feeling in control
- CommonJS modules
- unfortunate
- configurable
- better/superior solution/way to do something
- slow to upgrade/switch to latest version/current best practice/way of doing things
- control (programming)
- fighting against your tools
- under my control
- holdover
- having more control/certainty when you do something manually
Annotators
URL
-
-
engineering.mixmax.com engineering.mixmax.com
-
There are two ways of handling this with Rollup, as described by the troubleshooting link from the warning. Unfortunately, both Rollup and React recommend the wrong one.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Luckily, there is absolutely no good reason not to use strict mode for everything — so the solution to this problem is to lobby the authors of those modules to update them.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
DX: start sapper project; configure eslint; eslint say that svelt should be dep; update package.json; build fails with crypt error; try to figure what the hell; google it; come here (if you have luck); revert package.json; add ignore error to eslint; Maybe we should offer better solution for this.
-
When the message say function was called outside component initialization first will look at my code and last at my configuration.
Tags
- dev experience
- error messages: should reveal/point to why/how error was caused and how to fix/prevent it
- useless/unhelpful/generic error messages that don't reveal why/how error was caused
- good point
- what a reasonable person would do
- errors are helpful for development (better than silently failing)
- reasonable expectation
- expectations
- errors
- can we do even better?
- frustrating
- web search for something brings me here
Annotators
URL
-
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
The recommended solution for onMount is the same as for useEffect — place an async function inside the handler
-
-
-
There are work arounds, but nothing clean. I just feel like this should be functionality that should be part of the slot feature.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
If you want this control then wrap them in a DOM node that the parent controls. If you want to pass in values then use props and if you want to pass in values from higher up the tree, the new style RFC may be able to help.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
I think Svelte's approach where it replaces component instances with the component markup is vastly superior to Angular and the other frameworks. It gives the developer more control over what the DOM structure looks like at runtime—which means better performance and fewer CSS headaches, and also allows the developer to create very powerful recursive components.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Lets not extend the framework with yet another syntax
-
I totally get not wanting to extend the syntax. I tried doing these things and in practice it was not easy or pretty. Actions provide a much cleaner and easier way to accomplish a certain set of functionality that would be much more difficult without it.
Tags
- feature not needed; better to use a different approach/feature instead
- could be easier / more difficult than it needs to be
- clean
- avoid complexity
- programming: multiple ways to do the same thing
- library/framework could make this easier
- just use/do...
- you aren't going to need it
- clean solution
- keep things simple
Annotators
URL
-
-
-
Why not just do something like this?
-
You must: reference each element you are extending using refs or an id add code in your oncreate and ondestroy for each element you are extending, which could become quite a lot if you have a lot of elements needing extension (anchors, form inputs, etc.)
-
This can and should be done with other components, IMHO.
Tags
- scalability
- feature not needed; better to use a different approach/feature instead
- too hard/difficult/much work to expect end-developers to write from scratch (need library to do it for them)
- framework taking care of responsibility so users can leverage it and not have to worry about that responsibility themselves
- could be easier / more difficult than it needs to be
- just use/do...
- difficult/hard
- why this feature is needed
Annotators
URL
-
-
github.com github.com
-
The feature is highly likely to be implemented, the API and implementation are the only real topics of discussion right now.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
You should install the packages individually. Alternatively, you can install all of them at once with the svelte-material-ui package.
-
-
jsrocks.org jsrocks.orgJS Rocks1
-
6to5 attempted to ship a quick and dirty TDZ static checking feature but had to retract it immediately afterwards due to various bugs in the algorithm.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
There are tools in Svelte that break this expectation to a degree, but they are a bit annoying to use, which makes it an active decision on the part of the developer. The API hints at the way we want you to do things because we feel that this will give the better experience.
-
Most of the linked issues, as well as this RFC, attempt to solve this problem by relaxing Svelte's CSS scoping rules, providing a better API with which to use global, or by manually passing down classes. We have never found this to be an acceptable solution which is why those issues have been closed. That position has not changed.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Or if we formally took a stance that the class prop is THE ordained way to pass class attributes, though I don't think this functionality warrants this restriction.
-
-
daveceddia.com daveceddia.com
-
-
React doesn’t provide something like ng-class, but there is a great library called classnames that does the same and more. Install it:
-
- Aug 2020
-
blog.pragmaticengineer.com blog.pragmaticengineer.com
-
GTD strategies
Author refers to the [Getting Things Done book](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1633.Getting_Things_Done) by David Allen.
Also recommend complementing above with J. Knapp's excellent Make Time book
-
- Jul 2020
-
lwn.net lwn.net
-
"that text has been removed from the official version on the Apache site." This itself is also not good. If you post "official" records but then quietly edit them over time, I have no choice but to assume bad faith in all the records I'm shown by you. Why should I believe anything Apache board members claim was "minuted" but which in fact it turns out they might have just edited into their records days, weeks or years later? One of the things I particularly watch for in modern news media (where no physical artefact captures whatever "mistakes" are published as once happened with newspapers) is whether when they inevitably correct a mistake they _acknowledge_ that or they instead just silently change things.
-
-
-
The second situation occurs when a person says unpleasant things about another when he or she ought to have known they are false. A reasonable person generally refrains from sharing negative information about others if he or she has reason to doubt its veracity.
-
-
bugs.ruby-lang.org bugs.ruby-lang.org
-
While the modifying version will occasionally be useful, in general, we should gently push people towards using non-modifying code.
-
-
bugs.ruby-lang.org bugs.ruby-lang.org
-
Matz, alas, I cannot offer one. You see, Ruby--coding generally--is just a hobby for me. I spend a fair bit of time answering Ruby questions on SO and would have reached for this method on many occasions had it been available. Perhaps readers with development experience (everybody but me?) could reflect on whether this method would have been useful in projects they've worked on.
-
-
stylo.ecrituresnumeriques.ca stylo.ecrituresnumeriques.ca
-
[vérifier référence]
reste à faire
-
- Jun 2020
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
-
OK, so what about regular messages? Turns out they are not encrypted after all. Where Signal implements the security and privacy protocols right from the start, Telegram separates the two and offers an additional option. The problem is that not everyone is aware of the Secret Chat option and first-time users may send sensitive information in the regular chat window unknowingly.
-