We naturally tend to take shortcuts. Doing difficult things is difficult, but thats where we learn. Its like mindfulness, when you realise you're going down the bad path (distraction -> easy route), bring yourself back to the better state (focusing on your breath -> attempting that challenging task head on)

Rosanna’s body movement and facial expression grow weird. Perhaps it is because she is so infatuated with Franklin. Her crazy love of Franklin and jealousy of Rachel may cause the psychological deformity inside her. Her strange behaviors make me suspect that she might have been involved in the steal of the Moonstone.

This paragraph describes a series of measures Franklin conducts to deal with the accident. He arranges the inspections methodically. We can discover that Franklin indeed has a clear head and really wants to find out the criminal.

This was the second time the head of the servants was treated impolitely as it used to be. What's on earth going wrong?

This sentence puzzles me. As says as followed, it has a moral. By now, I couldn't find out what's that exactly.

Maybe bolded to make this stand out?

The Rector was the head of the university and spiritual guide to students.

This reminds me of those scenes that you see in movies, where the angel and the devil are both on someone's shoulder, and they are interfering with their decision.

Radial Symmetry is in the context of the body composition for the heptapod, when split into parts. When you cut a human down the middle, you get two even parts, a left and right half. Heptapods have a radial symmetry and not bi-symmetrical like humans. Radial symmetry creatures are much more otherworldly. Hard to divide the body up. This further the impression of heptapods’ strange appearance with the details prior. If they have no ‘forward’ direction like a human having no head per se looking onward, and are radial symmetry it would hard to decipher what body parts function for what, and with that the heptapods have a developed a much different form of understanding for their strange appearance.

I find it interesting how this scene plays out in the character's head. The "you'll say. You'll give me" etc. shows how the character wants/expects the scene to play out.

the shadows are their secrets but during the day the go away

Hello, I am the Citerpress bot :) I think this sentence is mentioning a news article without an explicit link. I looked in my news database and here is what I found:

Hit #1 (score of 74.1)

Hit #2 (score of 74.1)

Hit #3 (score of 36.7)

Hit #4 (score of 36.7)

Hit #5 (score of 36.4)

I did my best! My annotations will get better and better with time, as I index new pages every day.

Hello, I am the Citerpress bot :) I think this sentence is mentioning a news article without an explicit link. I looked in my news database and here is what I found:

Hit #1 (score of 60.3)

Hit #2 (score of 60.3)

Hit #3 (score of 33.1)

I did my best! My annotations will get better and better with time, as I index new pages every day.

Hello, I am the Citerpress bot :) I think this sentence is mentioning a news article without an explicit link. I looked in my news database and here is what I found:

Hit #1 (score of 46.4)

Hit #2 (score of 46.4)

Hit #3 (score of 35.6)

Hit #4 (score of 35.6)

Hit #5 (score of 32.3)

I did my best! My annotations will get better and better with time, as I index new pages every day.

A key factor within Brutus’s tragic downfall is his underestimation of Mark Anthony’s capabilities as an orator and tactician. The authoritative tone of this notion creates an essence of leadership and power within Brutus, while the personification of Caesar’s arm portrays his misjudgment of Anthony’s power. Later within the play, Anthony's soliloquy plays a major role in the eventual destruction of Brutus. He does not expect Anthony to influence the masses of Rome and revolt against the senators, while worsening the political situation. Evidently, Shakespeare aims to prove how a successful leader needs to have a perceptive attitude as well as obtain honour and strong stature within society.

The heightened emotional tension elicited by the recurring metaphorical image “to cut the head off” and “hack the limbs” emphasises Brutus’ conflicting intentions. His respect towards Caesar’s corpse is underscored by the prevailing aspiration to “carve him as a dish fit for the gods, /Not hew him as a carcass fit for hounds”, accentuating his esteemed nature through the forewarning: “our course will seem to bloody”.

Cassius's sentiment is shown through his dialogue with Brutus about the planned killing of "Let Antony and Caesar fall together". Shakespeare portrays, through metaphorical image, Brutus's respect for Caesar and his own cause "our cause will seem to bloody". Letting Mark Antony live, a loyal combatant to Caesar and a dear friend, foreshadows the following events which would happen as they believe him just to be a follower "For Antony is but a limb of Caesar.

Introducing Portia in a domestic context, the scene gives the readers a deeper insight into Portia’s remarkable struggle in the depicted, male-dominated society. At Portia’s entrance, Brutus’ remark ‘ It is not for your health/ to commit/ to the raw cold morning” immediately alludes to a perception of women being fragile, which associates their incapability of participating in the political sphere - a stereotype of women in the Elizabethan era. Portia, in retaliation, replies ‘Nor for yours neither’ and goes on to complain about Brutus’ reluctance to reveal about his unusual actions “I urged you further / And you too impatiently stamped with your foot / Yet I insisted, yet you answered not” Note that Portia confronts Brutus in an assertive manner and she is determined to insist on asking until Brutus reveals the secrets. Situational irony is employed here: Portia’s behaviours do not conform with Elizabethan ideals of a wife, since elizabethan women were expected to obey the orders of male members of the family without questioning. Portia’s repetitive questioning ‘Is Brutus sick? And is it physicalTo walk unbracèd/ To add unto his sickness?’ and her condemnation of Brutus having ‘sick offense within (his) mind’ create a sharp contrast against the ideals, along with Brutus’ minimal lines in the scene establish Portia as the dominant figure, thus breaking the stereotype of women being submissive and inferior by highlighting Portia’s strong masculine qualities. In addition, she further demonstrates her ‘constancy’ by stating she is a ‘well-reputed woman’, a woman that is ’fathered and so husbanded’ and by showing a wound she inflicts on her thigh, these actions place emphasis on her ability of enduring male dominance despite two male members in her family being great leaders. Overall, this scene highlights Portia’s grit and bravery, character traits that were usually associated with men, in a time where there are wide-held beliefs of women being inferior.

Nicholas Hytner’s decision to portray Casca (Adjoa Andoh) with a unique accent and talking style, emphasises the exaggeration of her experience with the Roman population. This is proven by how she rolls her eyes and performs unusual head movements, the unrealistic existence of her style and characterisation during the Elizabethan Era reflects upon her previous supernatural recounts. As Ajoa Andoh complains about the masses of the country she dramatically changes her voice into a louder, deeper tone when emphasising the “bad air” and “stinking breath”. While doing this she acquires a serious facial expression and raises her eyebrows, accentuating her real disgust and disregardance towards the poor citizens of Rome.

Caesar's confidence and self appraisal is depicted through David Calder, who embodies Caesar's seeming paranoia: "Let me have men about me that are fat ... Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look". Calder expresses Caesar's frustration through his tilted head and slouched back, aggressive hand gestures, and disappointed tone of voice. When Caesar vindictively accuses Cassius' disingenuous intent in, "Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look", Hytner dramatises Caesar's anxious state via his constant pacing and worried facial expression, as to further highlight his paranoia regarding the stability of his political ranking.

The metaphor of 'falling sickness' used by Cassius to reflect upon the failures of Brutus, Casca and Cassius to act upon Caesar's image on the public. The idea of sickness reveals the inner turmoil inside of Cassius' head as he feels his failures have resulted in the fall of Rome. This metaphor can also be intepreted as irony due to Caesar's health condition. Despite the three's perfect health, it is Caesar who holds more power above them. Ironically despite literally having the 'falling sickness', it is Caesar's who rules over and the three of them who are weaker in power.

As the conspirators exit the scene in the Hytner production, the sound of the door closing behind them resembles the sound of a gunshot. David Morrissey begins his soliloquy speaking with a soft tone, but as he gradually walks up to Caesar's body his voices sharply increases in loudness to the point where his anger is plain for all to see. It's a moment of epiphany as the audience realises that Antony is indeed resentful and vengeful for what the conspirators did to who he perceived as the noblest man that ever lived. As he begins to detail to the audience how he will go to war for caesar, he slowly rears his head back from looking at Caesar to face the way in which the conspirators left and slowly speaks with a husky voice "a curse shall light upon the limbs of men." Hytner utilises this instance, to portray to the audience that Antony is indeed referring to the conspirators, and presents a sense of foreboding for whats to come.

In this production, David Calder's shows his dissatisfaction by using body language. His face shows anger, his eyebrows shot up to indicate this. Then, he leans forward to indicate in a mocking tone, that Metellus Cimber dare try to use "sweet words" to try and get Caesar to release Publius. He then uses his hands to gesture a shooing away of Metellus Cimber, to indicate that he is disappointed, and wishes not to be further questioned about this. In response, Metellus Cimber drops her head, to indicate some sort of uselessness or disappointment in her attempts to free her brother. Overall, the usage of these body languages and gestures allows the Hynter production to truly express what Caesar means, and allows the audience to follow what is going on, even if they don't understand Shakespearean language.

In the NT adaptation of the play, we only see Brutus in the scene. All other characters are omitted, this brings particular highlight to Brutus's words, adding to the gravity of the his words and the desperation and importance behind them. The tone of his voice yells in haste and almost begins to turn into a begging tone. This, coupled with the literal spotlight over his head, obscuring everything but him and the ground on which he stands works to put Brutus and his words into the metaphorical spotlight.

Shakespeare mocks the typical Petrarchan poetry's blazon, which glorifies a woman by comparing each of her body parts to something beautiful or precious. He is saying all the opposites to describe his mistress.

This scene in the play highlights Brutus' hypocritical nature. Brutus requests to Octavius and Mark Antony they must discuss their differences rather than head out into warfare, he addresses them as "countrymen" similarly to the speech he delivered in Act 3 Scene 2. Octavius responds to Brutus mocking his pacifism and referencing the speech that Brutus delivered in Act 3 scene 2. Octavius claims to Brutus, "not that we love words better, as your do." This claim parallels Brutus' statement his Act 3 scene 2 speech claiming "not that I loved Caesar less, but that Ioved Rome more." Mark Antony then follows up Octavius' insult by pointing out the hypocrisy in Brutus' plea. He explains how Brutus did not even attempt to speak to Caesar before murdering him in cold blood, alleging that Brutus "gives good words" after "bad strokes."

Hytner profoundly and effectively portrays Cassius’ ultimate downfall in this scene. A close up shot of Cassius’ face is shown depicting his intricate facial features included wrinkles furrowed brows as he admits in his soliloquy, ‘Caesar thou art revenge even with the weapon that killed thee’. Cassius also has defeated body language including a hunched back and lowered head towards the end of this scene. Hytner’s use of simple stage settings including a black background with minimal smoke is effective as it draws attention to Cassius’ pain and feelings of regret and guilt.

Discussed 2/13. Of course, the parachute lends an enormous effective area to the skydiver, so that the new terminal speed -- the landing speed -- is slow enough to survive.

Why we concentrated on that part of Ch. 3

i.e., graphical or analytical methods

Hello, I am the Citerpress bot :) I think this sentence is mentioning a news article without an explicit link. I looked in my news database and here is what I found:

Hit #1 (score of 46.8)

Hit #2 (score of 44.9)

Hit #3 (score of 44.8)

Hit #4 (score of 44.3)

Hit #5 (score of 44.2)

I did my best! My annotations will get better and better with time, as I index new pages every day.

She's dazed by the blow, but then becomes even angrier, rushes on top of Red Cross Knight and wraps him up with her tail.

She hates light so is put off by the shine of his armor.

I must confess, that until today, I've not thought about how nationalistic Morrissey's "Irish Blood, English Heart" is in his nowadays context.

At the end of Act 4 Scene 1 (1:42:34) in the NT Production of Julius Caesar, body language is displayed by Mark Antony (David Morrissey). David Morrissey's use of body language in this scene does two things. The first is evident when we see him tap Octavius' arm (Kit Young), causing Octavius to stop in his tracks, look down and really analyse his next move whether it involves trusting Antony or not. Due to the fact that, after just talking ill of Lepidus and calling him "property" behind his back, Antony wants Octavius to take his side and combine powers. Second, it is simply telling Octavius to trust him and it will all work out. Thus, Hytner's subtle addition of 'a tap on the arm' acts as symbol of assurance and motivation.

In this scene, Lucilius tells Brutus that he has not been well received by Cassius - ‘not with such familiar instances’. Brutus then compares Cassius to a horse that is ‘hot at hand’, which makes ‘gallant show and promise of (its) mettle’. When fighting in Ancient Rome, the generals often had to bring ‘horse(s) of good mettle’ - horses that were physcially strong and courageous. In the battle, as a courageous horse charges forward, its head and neck arch down. But when it can not stand the test of tough battles, it shows fear by sagging its neck and moving its head back and up, which reveals its poor nature. Through the comparison, Brutus implies that Cassius hides his insincerity by straining himself to act nicely, but it is obvious that he is ‘making a gallant show’. Thus, the strong imagery used in Brutus’ quote adds tension to the scene by revealing Brutus’ discontent at Cassius’ actions and paves the way for their disagreement when Cassius arrives.

The weary blues symbolize the soul which echoes after he is asleep and abandoned his body.

This individual is not being treated the way that they feel they should be. But they are keeping their head up and looking to the future. They know that one day they will be able to sit at the table and "laugh" in the face of the one who told them to eat in the kitchen.

Leaves you with the question: is this one sad night in the blues man's life, "The stars went out and so did the moon," or a compression of time emblematic of his entire sad existence? "He slept like a rock or a man that's dead," Hughes seems to be telling us that he got out all of his blues for tonight, or they took his number off the wall and he died of the blues. Cruel of the poet not to give us a definitive answer.

This reminds me of my school site. The students were highly successful in resisting work. This resistance was usually misconstrued as unintelligence, struggle, slowness.

Example of the central idea in the beginning of the passage

These are some additional resources that were helpful to me in this unit:

http://www.oercommons.org/courses/copyright-crash-course/view

• This was a great crash course, very general information. I found the TEACH Act Checklist to be very helpful.

Non-North American Resources: https://vula.uct.ac.za/access/content/group/ecbd8ec1-9009-4d91-bbe5-4874517efb5c/Copyright%20OER/Flash/Main.html

• You’ll have to make sure Adobe Flash Player is installed for this one, but it’s worthwhile.

http://www.infotoday.com/it/apr19/Aycock--Weird-Things-People-Have-Tried-to-Copyright.shtml

• This article was helpful for my Unit 2 Assignment because I was researching choreography which can be tricky.

Non-North American Sources: https://iclg.com/practice-areas/copyright-laws-and-regulations/china

• This article was helpful to learn about copyright laws in China.

Non-North American Sources: https://www.fifa.com/about-fifa/marketing/brand-protection/intellectual-property.html (FIFA’s head office is in Switzerland)

• This was an interesting article from FIFA (we’re all in soccer mode) and I find it fascinating because they are truly an international organization.

Non-North American Sources: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/ Information on the Open Government License

• The UK has something called an Open Government license and it was interesting to learn about different options in different countries.

I hope everyone enjoys my additions to the list. Thank you!

Animal comparisons can't be too far behind in these readings

giving animal comparisons of everything he things there people represent

I like the word 'subvert' also, because good writers try to subvert bad ideas or assumptions that clash with their own experience - they work with them to turn them on their head.

Reading books is just a form of transmission from author to reader. Even if the reader is thoughful and takes deep thought, it may not coincide with the book's pre-planned path. i.e. I read this section in the article, I think deeply and at length, but now, I return to the article, and the next paragraph is not related to my thoughts...

i suggest a network of information, which ties to neurons of information to each other. If someone was tired or mentally fatigued, they could follow these networks (drawn by previous thinkers). The network is every increasing at each node. This network can be thought of a mind map, but breaks conventional mind map rules. Nodes can reconnect back to each other. Branches are not made, instead, every path in the network is equal in weight/ thickness.

Part 1: Capture network someone travels down. Part 2: Draw network (Mind map) Part 3: Suggest/ display network and journey a 'reader' can take.

(Dramatic, Decius) The seductive and passionate performance of these lines by the female actor playing Decius advocates an alternate view to Caesar's eventual change-of-mind and appearance in the Senate. Hytner's production exploits an ironic role reversal, with the female (Decius) standing with a masculine, powerful and overbearing pose, whilst Caesar is sitting, being scolded and scratching his head, baffled. In pyjamas, Hytner makes Caesar look foolish and powerless to resist to Decius' reasoning.

was so close to killing Archimago, dang it

wow so Archimago makes one of the spirits into a knight and has the spirit that looks like Una and has them in a bed together and wakes up Redcrosse to tell him that Una is laid up with another guy to anger him.... this old guy is kind of sick in the head

I'm interested to learn more about this "we" and how the group functions on an individual and collective level. I also read the title as a way for the members of the "we" to distinguish themselves and "how [they] do it" from other groups and how those groups do "it," which I'm assuming is teaching English with technology. Last note: I now have Montell Jordan's "This Is How We Do It" in my head as I begin the article, which is a plus.

Why is it worth it to think about all this, when Brexit is threatening the EU, the US President is causing a global collapse, and a comic is head of state in the Ukraine? That's because all this is decisive for the way the CDU, and by extension the German government, will progress.

A lot of simile's are used comparing different animals.

This is describing the crucifixion of Christ, which is both the son of God and God himself.

Talking about when Jesus died on the cross. He is saying that people don't care about him or what he did to save everyman.

At this point, Ben Whishaw, who portrays Brutus, leans ever closer at Cassius, and now holds up his hands towards his head, while speaking in an almost ridiculing tone towards Cassius, bidding her to remember the Ides of March. Later he says, "Julius bleed for justice' sake." The use of language, bodily movement, and facial expression provide us with an insight into how astounded he is by Cassius' corrupt actions, and how he cannot believe that his friend would make such a poor moral decision, after committing murder for the sake of justice. This building tension and anger within Brutus, also displays how he is panicked by all the troubles that surround him, both through the mustering forces of Octavius and Mark Antony, and the much closer problems of Cassius and Brutus' men.

The status of in between being alive and dead is brought up here again. There is a possibility that the person is in shock or confused by the status to the point that they cannot respond.

This stanza seems to draw back from the four previous parts of the poem where spring, water, fire, and death and life take on a specific place in the cycle of life. Thunder without rain provides another ominous feeling as has been the entire poem. Things that should be looked as positive are turned on its head. These are some kind of feelings that “we” all of us including the narrator has to struggle with. The end of this stanza gives an eerie thought that those who died in the war would be wishing to be alive and those alive (and witnessed the horrors of war) would wish to die soon “with little patience”.

Being suspended in time, not knowing what it means to be alive and evaluating the sense of purpose to keep on living. Given the interaction in this part of the poem, the conversation seems to become of a question of mental state than physical.

or is this perhaps a reference of the woman who lived in luxury. she recalls, perhaps someone who has died, but instead of naming who it is she remembers pearls and rags. she briefly mentions the death and mostly wonders about her life.

This stanza read to me as seven black boys with bright eyes that are sitting in jail accused of a crime they did not commit. It speaks to the injustices black men faced at the hands of the white patriarchal laws set up to work against the black population. This stanza is repeated as the final stanza to leave the readers with that image in their head because the injustices persist

Just follow the game

Hello, I am the Citerpress bot :) I think this sentence is mentioning a news article without an explicit link. I looked in my news database and here is what I found:

Hit #1 (score of 47.4)

Hit #2 (score of 46.3)

Hit #3 (score of 44.6)

I did my best! My annotations will get better and better with time, as I index new pages every day.

Hello, I am the Citerpress bot :) I think this sentence is mentioning a news article without an explicit link. I looked in my news database and here is what I found:

Hit #1 (score of 66.1)

Hit #2 (score of 60.3)

Hit #3 (score of 45.5)

Hit #4 (score of 39.4)

Hit #5 (score of 30.4)

I did my best! My annotations will get better and better with time, as I index new pages every day.

Hello, I am the Citerpress bot :) I think this sentence is mentioning a news article without an explicit link. I looked in my news database and here is what I found:

Hit #1 (score of 54.0)

Hit #2 (score of 44.3)

Hit #3 (score of 41.5)

Hit #4 (score of 40.5)

Hit #5 (score of 38.4)

I did my best! My annotations will get better and better with time, as I index new pages every day.

Example of organic gameplay instance driven by players interacting with eachother.

Hello, I am the Citerpress bot :) I think this sentence is mentioning a news article without an explicit link. I looked in my news database and here is what I found:

Hit #1 (score of 70.0)

Hit #2 (score of 63.8)

Hit #3 (score of 61.0)

Hit #4 (score of 56.7)

Hit #5 (score of 53.3)

I did my best! My annotations will get better and better with time, as I index new pages every day.

Hello, I am the Citerpress bot :) I think this sentence is mentioning a news article without an explicit link. I looked in my news database and here is what I found:

Hit #1 (score of 70.0)

Hit #2 (score of 63.8)

Hit #3 (score of 61.0)

Hit #4 (score of 56.7)

Hit #5 (score of 53.3)

I did my best! My annotations will get better and better with time, as I index new pages every day.

Hello, I am the Citerpress bot :) I think this sentence is mentioning a news article without an explicit link. I looked in my news database and here is what I found:

Hit #1 (score of 70.0)

Hit #2 (score of 63.8)

Hit #3 (score of 61.0)

Hit #4 (score of 56.7)

Hit #5 (score of 53.3)

I did my best! My annotations will get better and better with time, as I index new pages every day.

Hello, I am the Citerpress bot :) I think this sentence is mentioning a news article without an explicit link. I looked in my news database and here is what I found:

Hit #1 (score of 63.1)

Hit #2 (score of 60.5)

Hit #3 (score of 51.5)

Hit #4 (score of 46.6)

Hit #5 (score of 46.6)

I did my best! My annotations will get better and better with time, as I index new pages every day.

After reading the article, I realized that it is extremely simple to check some of the things online that we are consuming, especially when we spend so much time on our devices. I haven't really checked what I was looking at or reading, except for school work, and I think that Caulfield has provided some easy ways for us to do so.

First off i want to say what a great article, i really enjoyed reading it. I chose this quote because it pretty much sums up the article. It also explains a lot of what is already going on the media and ways we can improve. It's so true. If a lot more people would stop to look up if the information they heard or read about were true, then there would be so much less fake news. It's important to not be so quick to believe everything that is online.

a band or ribbon worn around the head, especially for binding the hair.

He is extremely fastidious.

is she seeing God as when he died with the thorns in his head?

A wimple is an ancient form of female headdress, formed of a large piece of cloth worn around the neck and chin, and covering the top of the head. Its use developed in early medieval Europe. Today the wimple is worn by certain nuns who retain a traditional habit. When I think of wimple, I think of a hijab that modern day muslims wear as a symbol of their religion. The reason that I connected the two of them is because they are both signs of religions and are bother worn on the head of females or women.

a cloth headdress covering the head, neck, and the sides of the face, formerly worn by women and still worn by some nuns.

I like how this line was included so we may develop a visual representation in our head of what the young Squire looks like. Given that he is the son, it's possible that perhaps the father also had similar imagery.

A deal was made. Whoever lost the deal had their head cut off? at least that's what I am understanding.

If Arcite is ever found on Theseus’s lands, he will be killed.

Frost follows the same pattern as Masters when he speaks about the neighbor who is stuck in a time past. He has a belief that walls are order and the narrator thinks differently and wishes to change his old ways of living.

I sense a stripped-down echo of Whitman in this poem, but negative, as if all the joy and beauty that Whitman feels about America has been turned on its head.

called net_conv in the code

John Lane (1854-1925) was a publisher who co-founded Bodley Head with Charles Elkin Mathews in 1887 as a bookshop before transitioning into publishing novels. He would go one to leave Bodley head and help open Penguin books. John Lane would help Stein publish her first book: Three Lives in 1909.

Gertrude Stein was introduced to John Lane by Myra Edgerly, a painter, who believed Steins work should be made available to the public. Gertrude was offered a contract by John to publish her writings, in particular Three Lives. Stein would often spend Sunday afternoons at John's house in London reviewing and revising the book before publishing. He is said to be enthusiastic and confident about her novel.

"Making Britain.” Bodley Head | Making Britain, www.open.ac.uk/researchprojects/makingbritain/content/bodley-head.

The poem seems to be suggesting that the narrator could be outside of the boundaries of time. The idea that the narrator "was again alone" is something that is repeated throughout the poem

the poet is back home in his town and is a stranger because no longer are his friends there and he is getting drunk thus everyone who sees him no longer pay attention to him.

Out into the world is into the public, where things become a thing, or to the frontier, where you may find a there. I reckon people born at the frontier nexus would have to head public, despite hating it, because there no such thing as home for them.

One thing I noticed about this text is that the beginning of the sentence is at the end, and the end of the sentence is at the beginning. It may not be true, but if I thought about the authors writing that way, it helped me understand the writing. I think the author wants me to know the lesson of being true to my word, no matter how weird or bad it is. Even if my head is going to be chopped off, try to keep my word. Maybe the author wanted me to learn the lessons of to try to trek through treachery. To go through a wilderness of love and pain and come out the other side. I don't really have any questions. It was hard to read, but the text made sense overall. My mind wanders into the great world of King Arthur. Where knights are thought as deities. Where you may kiss the wife of a king, even though she is your aunt. Where there is nothing bigger than a twin size bed apparently.

Overall this was a great story and seemed like a story to be of a lesson to others that though you may be tempted it is always best to resist that temptation for in the long run it might come to bite you in the butt. I was honestly super surprised that the host was the man in the green. I still don't understand why he went out of his way to challenge someone and have his head cut and then a year later bring them into their palace with their woman and then end up not killing them. I was also very surprised that he did not give into the woman which is probably part of their plan to see if he would fall for it. Over all great but strange story.

This is another reminder of the fate that awaits Sir Gawain.

weighing down and heavy on him

he is not very affectionate or expressive with his emotions

Sir Gawain is truly quite the man. He really is a very strong a courageous fighter and is not at all once to be fearful.

he wasen't a coward. He was going to give the green giant the same chance to chop off his head

he had never seen a boar so large, so he complemented the lord but was also fearful for what he had done because it was dangerous

This was very good wordplay. I painted a very good image in my head.

Gives me a great image in my head

John Lane was a British publisher. He was one of the founders for both publishing houses The Bodley Head and Penguin Books

This is interesting to me. People at the time would have saw it is magic or some devilish act. This was not the times of pilgrimage, so witchcraft was not the common topic.

This is also a Framing device.

This is very gruesome. Why did Gawain feel the need to chop the head off? I don't know if this is just typical but I think it reveals a lot about Gawain

Arthur portrays a very respectful yet authoritative tone

Seems like this is a mythical creature/knight. He picked his own head up is this a metaphor or analogy to something else?

He seems to be fearless.

the now headless giant is very nonchalant about the whole ordeal

Imagery (personally it grossed me out) of Gawain cutting through the giants skin with the axe and cutting off his head

If any of you are brave enough, step up and swing this ax. If you do, it's yours to keep.

It's interesting and it says something about Arthur's character that he merely calls himself the "head of this house" instead of King Arthur, since the title of king is much more powerful.

is the beheaded knight magical?

It's as if Mary is being medicalized by her own husband. It's the notion of "I know what is best for you" coming from John. It is clear that the male patriarchy is a dominant force within this text. As Mary seems to be victim of her husband enforcing what he wants for her, versus how she feels. She explicitly says she is sick, but he seems to be head of the household so it is his words versus her own.

This phrase symbolizes the confinement that the narrator is feeling even though she is living inside her own room. This feeling began to show up after taking down the wallpaper.

This is by far my favorite line, every time I read this story, no matter how creepy it gets, I always laugh at this line. She is so deep into her fantasy that she is perturbed that John “fainted... right across [her] path.” I imagine her creeping over him again and again, shaking her head every time she comes full circle again only to have to creep over him again.

Note how Du Bois begins and ends with the "Negro Problem." Here, he turns the idea on its head, making it a solution: if America could bring resolution, then it would realize its own ideals of freedom.

Four our creative annotation we decided to depict the weeding scene with the literal depiction of Hero as an orange. Though unlike the rottenness she allegedly posses, she is shown ripe and pure as her wedding dress and vale remain white. Claudio is shown looking away from Hero telling everybody about her alleged actions. His ring is thrown on the floor as he breaks apart from his union to Hero. Ironically, the friar has a skull like head since he’s wedding the death of Claudio’s love. To accompany the piece we also created a short poem.

Leonato is at a crossroads He found out something he was not supposed to know. He found out something very dark and so He found out that Hero was indeed a hoe

Upon seeing the act he became quite mad As a soldier with pride he could not get sad To take her back was an idea to perceive But in all actuality he just wanted to leave

Now when he looks at her He sees an orange rotting What he didn’t know Is that behind the scenes someone had been plotting.

In these lines, Claudio is rejecting Hero at their wedding because he is under the impression that she laid with someone else the night prior. This disgust is a mixture of both her “cheating” on him, and also the fact that she is no longer a virgin. Hero was an innocent and pure by being a virgin, which was a favorable trait during the Elizabethan Era and a main reason why Claudio liked Hero so much. Claudio calls Hero a “rotten orange”, and no longer wants to marry her. The use of “rotten orange” takes something that is supposed to be fresh and sweet and turns it bad and sour, similar to how Claudio now feels about Hero. This is a major shift from the “head over heels” attitude Claudio had for Hero previously, which inevitably makes you feel sorry for Hero because of Claudio’s accusatory tone. Shakespeare makes the point here about how brittle society’s views were, and how hearsay could shift societies opinions drastically.

a behavioral pattern

You might think this is the place to look for material on whether there are any possible dangers of 5g. However, in an eccentric decision, editors of this articlle remove any sections on the topic as here Removed Dangers of 5g and their explanation on talk page here.

Wikipedia does have a separate article on the topic of Mobile phone radiation and health, but material from that article is not permitted here and this page doesn't link to it. Sadly that article also has almost nothing on 5g and health.

In 2011 then WHO /International Agency for Researchon Cancer (IARC) classified radio frequency EM fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B).

If there is a risk it's a tiny one, of certain type of brain cancer. You can take measures to avoid the risk such as not holding a cellphone near your head while downloading large files.

IARC classifies radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans

Mayo clinic puts the situation like this:

The bottom line? For now, no one knows if cellphones are capable of causing cancer. Although long-term studies are ongoing, to date there's no convincing evidence that cellphone use increases the risk of cancer. If you're concerned about the possible link between cellphones and cancer, consider limiting your use of cellphones — or use a speaker or hands-free device that places the cellphone antenna, which is typically in the cellphone itself, away from your head.

Is there a connection between cellphones and cancer?

A couple of hundred scientists have signed an appeal to the WHO to say it needs further investigation. Not 5g particularly but cell phones and wifi generally.

The evidence isn't very good yet but they think there is enough to be worth investigating on a precautionary level.

International Scientists Appeal to U.N. to Protect Humans and Wildlife from Electromagnetic Fields and Wireless Technology

These scientists are concerned about a very minute risk of cancer. Though too small to be noticed, if there are even a few deaths in a million, it is something to take precautions to prevent.

There is a lot of conspirachy theory nonsense on the topic however. See for instance

• FACT CHECK: Did a 5G Cellular Network Test Cause Hundreds of Birds to Die?

Dogberry is the character that has the most sway in this scene. Although he is, most of the time, bumbling and misusing his words, Shakespeare puts our expectations of him on his head. He stands accusing Conrade and Borachio of their collaboration with Don John as they can’t do anything to stop him, and has control of the account Sexton writes. He most importantly has Borachio reveal the evil plan of Don John, who’s plotting for the foiling of Claudio and Hero’s marriage. Being the head of the night watch, who was responsible for the capturing of Conrade and Borachio in the first place, Dogberry effectively acts as the hero of the play. Although he acts too late to save the marriage initially, he prevents Don John’s plan from panning out any further. Right in the middle of when Claudio and Benedick challenge one another, Dogberry comes and informs them of their deception. He effectively saves them from their own arrogant and misguided sense of righteousness before one could kill the other. I chose to depict Dogberry in this fashion because he, however flawed, proves himself a saving grace for the characters of the play. I wanted the powerful graphic style of WW2 era posters to turn him into a symbol of inspiration, overcoming his inherit awkwardness to come out on top.

This drawing depicts Benedick before and after the events of Much Ado About Nothing played out. Cut into two frames, the first frame on the left shows Benedick before the events of the play occurred and the frame on the right is after. The first frame shows Benedick alone with a pair of horns on his head. In Scene 1 act 1, Benedick says that he does not want to marry because he would likely cheat on his wife. Based on old tale, cuckolds would grow horns on one’s head. The scene on the right shows Benedick after marrying Beatrice. Beatrice and Benedick seemed to have a complicated relationship but after they both were “tricked” into confessing their love for each other, they end up vowing to marry in act 5 scene 4. The contrast between Benedick at the beginning of the play and after shows just how much he changed and grew as a person. He went from never wanting to marry to marrying the girl he loves.

I decided to put Benedick’s head on the bull with the horns to visualize the metaphor of the taming of the savage bull. Everyone, specifically Claudio and Don Pedro, has directly mocked Benedick for being so averted to marriage, which Benedick is surrounded by in my piece. I used marker because this medium allows for a rougher texture that gives the effect of Claudio and Don Pedro’s words. Furthermore, the horns are red to show it's importance to the metaphor. Don Pedro has a crown over him because he is the Prince of Aragon which is also colored purple because that symbolizes royalty and lastly, Claudio is blue symbolizing loyalty.

In this line, Claudio pokes fun at Benedick for his reluctance to get married by using a metaphor involving the taming of a wild animal. This metaphor is commonly used throughout this play and comes from a classical myth in which Zeus took the form of a bull and carried off the mortal woman Europa. Just as a free bull is tamed by a farmer, in *Much Ado About Nothing* the bachelor is tamed by responsibility when he becomes a married man. This bull’s horns are another part of the image: the cuckold was depicted as having horns sprouting from his head. By comparing Benedick to a wild untamed animal, Shakespeare has solidified the character of Benedick as one who is converted by marriage, a beast of burden, and at risk of a cuckold-like shame, thus, making the “domesticated savage bull” a symbol of marriage throughout the play. 

Benedick and Beatrice’s rollercoaster of a relationship is one of the most remarkable elements of the already bizarre plot of Much Ado About Nothing. In Benedick’s soliloquy at the beginning of Act 2, Scene 3, he expresses his thoughts on love and the change that results in a man because of it. Benedick sees falling in love as a foolish endeavor and ridicules Claudio for becoming “the argument of his own scorn” by falling in love with Hero. The fact that Claudio and Don Pedro‘s scheme to fool the two adversaries into falling in love with each other actually works is comical and rather shocking. The place underlying love story between Benedick and Beatrice is a key factor in the character development of both lovers. Benedick, who begins the play as a hardened war hero, criticizing Claudio for falling in love with Hero, soon falls head over heels himself. Beatrice, a cynical “shrew” who swore never to marry, soon becomes a lovebird as well. Their change in heart is so drastic and ironic that it becomes one of the defining aspects of the play as a whole, making it the well known Shakespearean comedy it is today.

Great imagery. Makes the king really look and sad. Also ironic that he is in his own castle looking like a beggar

What happened to her? is she hurt or are they exaggerating her look of worry and stress. Also this is very beautifully described, the language used helps dramatize everything as well as paint a picture in the readers head.

This theory of antipodal focusing is disproved according to the intro to the cited source. The source says that the Chicxulub crater is offset from the antipodes by 130°. It also says that the impactor didn't have enough energy to cause melting at the antipodes. The cite says this disproves the antipodal theory.

Instead the new idea presented in the cite is that the impact generated a magnitude 9 earthquake worldwide and this caused volcanism to increase everywhere, through a now well established process by which nearby earthquakes can trigger increased volcanism. The Deccan traps started well before the impact, due to a rising "plume head", rising through the mantle which hapens every 20-30 million years, but after the impact they sped up and the chemistry changed.

Cite says:

The possibility that an impact at Cretaceous-Paleogene time caused Deccan volcanism has been investigated since the discovery of the iridium anomaly at Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary, with an emphasis on antipodal focusing of seismic energy. However, the Deccan continental flood basalts were not antipodal to the 66 Ma Chicxulub crater at the time of the impact, but instead separated by an epicentral distance of ~130°. Also, a Chicxulub-size impact does not in any case appear capable of generating a large mantle melting event. Thus, impact-induced partial melting could not have caused the initi-ation of Deccan volcanism, consistent with the occurrence of Deccan volcanism well before Cretaceous-Paleogene/Chicxulub time.

Instead, Deccan volcanism is widely thought to represent the initial outburst of a new mantle plume “head” at the beginning of the Réunion hotspot track

Accompanying press release from Berkely university says:

Michael Manga, a professor in the same department, has shown over the past decade that large earthquakes – equivalent to Japan’s 9.0 Tohoku quake in 2011 – can trigger nearby volcanic eruptions. Richards calculates that the asteroid that created the Chicxulub crater might have generated the equivalent of a magnitude 9 or larger earthquake everywhere on Earth, sufficient to ignite the Deccan flood basalts and perhaps eruptions many places around the globe, including at mid-ocean ridges.

“It’s inconceivable that the impact could have melted a whole lot of rock away from the impact site itself, but if you had a system that already had magma and you gave it a little extra kick, it could produce a big eruption,” Manga said.

Similarly, Deccan lava from before the impact is chemically different from that after the impact, indicating a faster rise to the surface after the impact, while the pattern of dikes from which the supercharged lava flowed – “like cracks in a soufflé,” Renne said – are more randomly oriented post-impact.

“There is a profound break in the style of eruptions and the volume and composition of the eruptions,” said Renne. “The whole question is, ‘Is that discontinuity synchronous with the impact?’”

Another cite here, "The Conversation" which is written by academics and is WP:RS.

More bad news for dinosaurs: Chicxulub meteorite impact triggered global volcanic eruptions on the ocean floor (2018)

Our observations suggest the following sequence of events at the end of the Cretaceous period. Just over 66 million years ago, the Deccan Traps start erupting – likely initiated by a plume of hot rock rising from the Earth’s core, similar in some ways to what’s happening beneath Hawaii or Yellowstone today, that impinged on the side of India’s tectonic plate. The mid-ocean ridges and dinosaurs continue their normal activity.

About 250,000 years later, Chicxulub hits off the coast of what will become Mexico. The impact causes a massive disruption to the Earth’s climate, injecting particles into the atmosphere that will eventually settle into a layer of clay found across the planet. In the aftermath of impact, volcanic activity accelerates for perhaps tens to hundreds of thousands of years. The mid-ocean ridges erupt large volumes of magma, while the Deccan Traps eruptions flood lava across much of the Indian subcontinent.

the monarch is only the head of the ruling class or aristocracy

The queen is in no sense the 'ruler of the UK.' Her official title is: 'Elizabeth II, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of her other realms and territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.'

Here you go, Jeff!

can you expand this point? Give us more historical context. You learned how a state Church of England was forged in the Reformation with Henry VIII as its head, and how, until the nineteenth century, it dominated most parts of British life.

In these lines, Benedick is talking directly to Claudio and Don Pedro about the topic of marriage. Benedick’s reference to the taming of the “savage bull” most likely is alluding to marriage and fidelity. Benedick is explaining that even the most “savage bulls” would eventually become tame and subject themselves to marriage. Perhaps his mentioning of the “savage bull” is about Beatrice and her witty and sarcastic banter towards him. At this point in the play, both characters don’t have any noticeable clear and strong feelings towards each other but Benedick could be referencing Beatrice due to the tension they exhibit at the beginning. In this scene Benedick is imagining a situation in which the horns of the bull have been plucked off and placed on his head. Back then, bull horns were imagined on the head of men whose wives cheated. Benedick is suggesting that maybe any woman who marries him would likely cheat, branding him with a pair of horns after.

i would really like to look at this exhibition. it is really amazing how they manage to have their culture survive even after all of the attempts that were made at destroying it.

Great use of language here. Seems so paint a very peaceful picture in the readers head.

This entire section was well described and made a great image in head as well as dramatized everything.

An unnecessary act of cruelty.

I find myself using my cellphone to look up questions that I want answers to, to look up the meaning of words, the weather of the day and even to see how my friends are spending their days, without even having to ask them. It is extremely convenient making it almost irrational to solve your own problems or even perform simple math in your head when your phone provides such an efficient solution. This results with less people having to think for themselves and relying more on the answers their phone provides. Siri has even made it possible to ask questions without having to physically type the letters out on the phone. All you have to do is speak to her.

wow

Nice work Spec Team! This was really interesting to read and great see all the different input from the group come together into one piece. Excited to see where your ideas head next!

Guillaume Apollinaire was a French writer and art critic. He was also a defender of Cubism and a forefather of Surrealism. He worked in a bank as a clerk. In 1914 he enlisted in the infantry during World War I. After receiving a head wound in 1916 he returned to Paris. In 1917 he wrote a poetic manifesto and a collection of poetry. he died of the Spanish Flu the following year in 1918, shortly after marrying Jacqueline Kolb.

This entire section about the son of Weohstan is very heroic and it makes the reader start liking him. But sadly, it makes us like his and admire him more than Beowulf.

The dragon is probably thinking, "the audacity of this dude to steal something from me while I am sleeping like the little angel I am! He should FEAR me!"

I think it is not very clear specifically I'm not sure what are the answers to the following questions:

1. Does cafe replicate all of the account threads or just a special subset ?
2. What if I want some data to be replicated by cafe A and other data by cafe B and maybe some data not be on any cafe at all ?

With the numbers they were catching in the past it is safe to say they would be catching far below than the 50% they were allowed to.

If non-indian fishers were banned altogether from fishing then there would never be an issue with shortages of fish.

This is a terrifying but honest truth about keeping anything public to the people, especially for people who live their life on twitter. I often hear my little brother reply to some of the things I am saying with a "retweet" or a "favorite". While I understand what he is saying, I am disappointed that he has subjected himself to not even using his own words to express how he feels. I imagine that this is comparable to hearing voices in your head, similar to the things you may read on twitter.

At this point in time I feel like new generation have become more and more drawn away from writing. Its rare to find someone who enjoys taking the time to create their own ideas and put them into script. Because of this, I feel like any past figures of writing wouldn't possibly settle for tweeting a small sentence or word even to describe all the thoughts and ideas in their head.

In these sentences, the author is showing an example that makes the article have a greater authority and that the recipients can know real cases of the relationship between twiter and writer. In addition, it deals with the idea of the audience, which is a key element for any type of publication. The audience is what often defines success.

It continues to amaze me how descriptive she is. i am able to picture an image in my head of everything she describes.

This sounds like the speaker is confused about who is his god or who he needs to go to for help. Also when eading this sentence it has a feeling of sorrow or guilt.

It would be much more elegant to have a node class, but for the sake of the exercise:

prepend = (value, list) => {
  return {value:value, rest:list};
}
arrayToList = arr => {
  head = null;
  for (let i = arr.length-1; i >= 0; i--){
    head = prepend(arr[i],head);
  }
  return head;
}
listToArray = list => {
  arr = []; head = list;
  while ( head !== null) {
    arr.push(head.value); head = head.rest;
  }
  return arr;
}
nth = (list,loc) => {
  if (head === null) { return null; }
  if (loc === 0) { return list.value; }
  return nth(list.rest, loc-1);
}

1. Is a sinner in the eighth circle of hell because of fraud, pandered his sister Ghisolbella into doing sexual favors for Marquis. A Guelf leader of Bologna, who was the political head of several cities, Venedico is rumoured to have curried favor with the Marquis of Este by subjecting his sister, Ghisolabella, to the man's lascivious desires.

2. Dante recognizes him as they lock eyes and he names him as Venedico Caccianimico

3. http://www.worldofdante.org/pop_up_query.php?dbid=P286

Saint Peter- Saint Peter the Apostle is the patron saint of many parishes. Saint Peter is also known as Simon Peter or Cephas, Prince of the Apostles, the first pope, and founder, with St. Paul, of the sea of Rome. Saint Peter worked as a fisherman with his brother Andrew, who introduced him to Jesus. Jesus called Peter to become a disciple. Peter appeared in the New Testament more than any other disciple. Peter was at Jesus’s side at the Transfiguration, the raising of Jairus’ daughter, the Agony of the Garden of Gethsemane, and played a major role in the Passion of Jesus. He helped organize the Last Supper, and Jesus gave Peter the famous command to lead the new Church, “Feed my lambs…. Tend my sheep…. Feed my sheep”. With that, Peter served as the head of the Apostles. Saint Peter is mentioned in Dante’s Inferno, because Jesus did not use Simony in choosing his apostles. Since Jesus did not use Simony in choosing his apostles, popes should not use Simony in awarding church offices. Peter is included in Dante’s Inferno through a reference to the Acts of the Apostles. Judas, who was bribed with 30 pieces of silver, killed himself, and had to be replaced. Peter and the remaining apostles did not use Simony in choosing Judas’s successor. For more information on Saint Peter, see https://saintpetertheapostle.com/church/about/our-patron-saint/

Bruce, Bruce David. “David Bruce: Dante's INFERNO: A Discussion Guide - ‘Canto 19: The Simonists.’” Davidbruceblog #3, 26 Jan. 2019, https://cosplayvideos.wordpress.com/2019/01/26/david-bruce-dantes-inferno-a-discussion-guide-canto-19-the-simonists/.

The author of the article is Bruce David Bruce. The article was last updated January 26, 2019. Bruce David Bruce went to Ohio University and majored in English and Philosophy. He got a bachelor’s degree with a double major in both areas, then added a master’s degree in English and a master’s degree in Philosophy. He is spending his retirement writing books such as Nadia Comaneci: Perfect 10, The Funniest People in Dance, Homer’s Iliad: A Retelling in Prose, and William Shakespeare’s Macbeth: A Retelling in Prose, and has a lot of experience and credibility. He plans to publish one or two books a year for the rest of his life.

Closeness - relates to social presence as increasing the 'salience' of another. Perception of another as real and the ability to project oneself as 'real'. Add to that non verbal immediacy, and video affords the opportunity to close psychological distance despite physical distance. Video then affords social presence by allowing one to project and be perceived as human BUT it is the application of nonverbal immediacy cues that closes psychological distance in an asynchronous environment where the instructor is at a physical distance from students (proxemics cannot be applied but gestures, head movements, facial expression, voice tone, eye contact, body language and pauses can). Combining verbal cues for social presence with non verbal indicators of immediacy allows instructors to increase 'humanness AND close the psychological distance between a dispersed learning community). Just like Teaching presence is manifested by social presence, non verbal immediacy increases the degree of social presence projected through instructor created video.

I think this also shows just how terrifying they must have been and it makes me wonder how victims of wars cope. How do they gain the courage and strength to eventually meet these memories head on?

conclusion

Denouement

denouement

denouement

"Amazed" may hold a different meaning and provide a different perspective, as the Oxford English Dictionary defines the word as: "To put out of one's wits; to stun or stupefy, as by a blow on the head; to infatuate, craze".

I feel like being king is not worth torturing people.

Which, if you're designing for someone else, may have some usefulness. But being transparent about that would be important. And probably having that person not just be the professor... Perhaps drawing from a community of people with authentic design needs.

I want trades training to be like this as well.

Some overlap with Nonviolent Communication here, I'm sure. It seems possible that the mapping enters the frame of social complexity itself--what happens when someone disagrees (does not validate what's written) in a way that signals emotional charge? I can think of a number of answers, but all of them call up the kind of complexity the method is designed to address. (Maybe this isn't a problem? Probably creates the potential to deal with that tension head-on?)

Would be funny and/or clever if it were not so deadly serious...

Devavrata become Bhishma because of his promise of celibacy. Bhishma was such a good son that he did not only gave up his rightful throne but also the right to have family and carnal pleasure. This in what makes Bhishma a hero. CC BY-NC-ND