Why on earth not? There's nothing wrong with reusing the same answer if it can work for multiple questions. That's called being efficient. It would be stupid to write a new answer from scratch when you already have one that can work very well and fits the question very well.

The "official" solution is to use submitErrors (see Erik's answer).

Which character is this referring to exactly?

It looks like the empty string, which wouldn't make sense.

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/functions-matching.html only lists these 2:

If pattern does not contain percent signs or underscores, then the pattern only represents the string itself; in that case LIKE acts like the equals operator. An underscore (_) in pattern stands for (matches) any single character; a percent sign (%) matches any sequence of zero or more characters.

Good question: Why do the big players like Azure not seem to worry? Microsoft, Amazon, Google, etc. too probably. In fact, any email provider. So once someone knows your email address, you are (more) vulnerable to someone trying to hack your account. Makes me wonder if the severity of this problem is overrated.

Irony: He (using his full real name) posts:

1. Information about which account ("my Azure account is my email address"), and
2. How high-value of a target he would be ("both sites manage highly valuable information that could take a whole company out of business...")

thus making himself more of a target. (I hope he does not get targetted though.)

Sure ...

This is a bit "I want a million dollars"

You can write this down and the devil is in how to implement it.

Another example:

const expensiveOperation = async (value) => {
  // return Promise.resolve(value)
    // console.log('value:', value)
    await sleep(1000)
    console.log('expensiveOperation: value:', value, 'finished')
    return value
}

var expensiveOperationDebounce = debounce(expensiveOperation, 100);

// for (let num of [1, 2]) {
//   expensiveOperationDebounce(num).then(value => {
//     console.log(value)
//   })
// }
(async () => { await sleep(0   ); console.log(await expensiveOperationDebounce(1)) })();
(async () => { await sleep(200 ); console.log(await expensiveOperationDebounce(2)) })();
(async () => { await sleep(1300); console.log(await expensiveOperationDebounce(3)) })();
// setTimeout(async () => {
//   console.log(await expensiveOperationDebounce(3))
// }, 1300)

Outputs: 1, 2, 3

Why, if I change it to:

(async () => { await sleep(0   ); console.log(await expensiveOperationDebounce(1)) })();
(async () => { await sleep(200 ); console.log(await expensiveOperationDebounce(2)) })();
(async () => { await sleep(1100); console.log(await expensiveOperationDebounce(3)) })();

Does it only output 2, 3?

Linux: Shift + Delete

locked issues that I would comment on if I could: Can't react to comment because locked. Want to thumb up.

I'm not quite sure I understand this (so until I do, I'm not sure I agree)...

Why does he think copying and pasting is the only way to make it readable? Like he pointed out, you can extract JSX snippets and use loops within JSX. But maybe he means (his previous point), that people often don't do that. Hmm. 

I don't understand the need for the name "Open–closed principle". It doesn't seem meaningful or clear to me.

Can't we just call it "extensibility" or "easily extendable"? Doesn't "extensibility" already imply that we are extending it (adding new code on top of it, to interoperate with it) rather than modifying its source code?

Sure, we don't need to add any additional indent. But what if your code block contains indentation (function body)? It would look silly to remove all leading indentation.

Is that expected behavior or am I doing something wrong?

The flexibility is nice!

I'd been wishing for a feature like this with grep/etc. tools.

I've had to use some really ugly workarounds (chain grep -C5 | grep -B5) which end up showing extra irrelevant context lines.

So I'm glad there's a clean way to do this now!

Why does he think they are dangerous?

So the posted answer wasn't necessary/correct? Which part of the answer was incorrect/unneeded?

I wish this OP comment included the full version of code that worked.

I don't understand this OP comment. Wasn't OP already returning loginDaoCall? So maybe the only thing they could mean is that they just needed to change it to return loginDaoCall.then(...) instead...

That would be consistent with what the answer said:

the promise returned by the further .then() does also get rejected and was not handled.

So I guess the unnecessary part of the answer was adding the return true/false...

Krammer, Florian. ‘SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Development’. Nature, 23 September 2020, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2798-3.

Can this word be used to describe the property in computing where a value can be dynamic? I feel like "dynamicness" would be a better term for this.

It seems to refer more to personality:

1a: marked by usually continuous and productive activity or change a dynamic city b: ENERGETIC, FORCEFUL a dynamic personality

See also the same sentiment here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4137596

No one knows what someone will be like after they've been brought into the world, but we don't lament every single person who is born. When someone you know is having a kid you don't say to them: "remember H.H. Holmes? Are you sure you want to have kid? They might be ten thousand times worse than H.H. Holmes!" Because that would be ridiculous.

The poem takes place on an island.

the repeated "I remember" signifies the introduction of a new idea/thought. Also sets up a good rhythm. Similar to an "I am from" poem

What part of LGPLv3 / MPL prevents LibreOffice code from being incorporated back into OpenOffice's Apache Licensed code??

These individuals who hit this "glass ceiling" make up the majority of the population in our classrooms. These are the children who's schools are underfunded and teachers are exhausted and burn out or who are fresh out of school with no experience, but a lot of motivation.

Hmm, are these taglines or slogans? According to https://yourbusiness.azcentral.com/slogan-vs-tagline-12643.html:

A tagline should represent your business, while a slogan represents a single product or is part of an advertising campaign

it seems that these are more taglines than slogans.

Is this saying that the name difference is inaccurate?

Why is it inaccurate? You even called it the "theoretic difference" above.

Is that because "relative complement" would be better? Or because the full phrase "theoretic difference" [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/set-theoretic_difference] is required in order for it to be accurate rather than just "difference"?

Not really. How?

How is the use of - for sets inaccurate?

... which have good names.

This implies that those names where the inverse_of cannot automatically be inferred are bad names. I disagree that a "good name" is at all related/dependent on that ability.

What they should say here instead is:

... which have names that allow the relationship to be easily inferred.

Or refer to these names as the "default" or "Rails conventional" names for these associations.

But it is not necessarily a better name. A better name is, quite often, one that is more descriptive and specific.

For example, just because by default if you use rails generate with a User model, it might (I don't remember; can it even generate associations?) create a belongs_to :user association doesn't mean that's the best name for it. belongs_to :author or belongs_to :owner, for example, being more specific, are likely better names. The model still needs a generic name like User because it may be used in various relationships, but the relationships themselves should pretty much never be called user because there's almost always a more specific name that better reveals/describes the relationship.

What would be nice is if JavaScript had a built-in way to do what I can do in Ruby with:

> I18n.interpolate('Hi, %{name}', name: 'Fred')
=> "Hi, Fred"

But to be fair, I18n comes from i18n library, so JS could just as easily (and I'm sure does) have a library that does the same thing.

Update: Actually, you can do this in plain Ruby (so why do we even need I18n.interpolate?):

main > "Hi, %{name}" % {name: 'Fred'}
=> "Hi, Fred"

main > ? String#%

From: string.c (C Method):
Owner: String
Visibility: public
Signature: %(arg1)
Number of lines: 9

Format---Uses str as a format specification, and returns the result
of applying it to arg. If the format specification contains more than
one substitution, then arg must be an Array or Hash
containing the values to be substituted. See Kernel::sprintf for
details of the format string.

   "%05d" % 123                              #=> "00123"
   "%-5s: %016x" % [ "ID", self.object_id ]  #=> "ID   : 00002b054ec93168"
   "foo = %{foo}" % { :foo => 'bar' }        #=> "foo = bar"

I guess that built-in version is fine for simple cases. You only need to use I18n.translate if you need its more advanced features like I18n.config.missing_interpolation_argument_handler.

This is better than creating a duplicate new thread.

There is no better place to respond to an existing topic than in the existing thread for that topic.

What's so bad about this solution? If it works, it works. And it only requires wrapping in 1 additional block. Pretty simple.

Analogue of shift built-in. Too bad there isn't just a pop built-in.

Strictly speaking, are these examples of dualities (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duality_(mathematics))? Or can I only, at strongest, say they are analogous (a looser coonection)?

Does this have any advantage over simply saving that key to a key file under ~/.ssh?

Like they do on https://stackoverflow.com/a/61944004/47185:

mv "$DEPLOY_KEY_PRIVATE" ~/.ssh/id_rsa

Where does deployer-token come from? Is this a placeholder or a well-known hard-coded value specific to __ (GitLab? my.company.com?)? Where is it documented?

Mojofication, Onion Souping, and the Network Service.

What is Mojofication?

What is Onion Souping?

But how do you check if they've given consent to a specific category??

Question (answer below)

Are they saying that it's not allowed to make signing up for a mailing list a precondition/requirement for anything? This was surprising to me.

So if you have a newsletter sign-up page that sends a digital bonus gift (like an e-book) to new subscribers, are required to completely change/repurpose your "newsletter sign-up page" into a "download e-book page" (that has an optional checkbox to also sign up for the newsletter, if you want)? That seems dumb to me, since it requires completely reversing the purpose of the page — which was, in my mind, primarily about signing up for the newsletter, with a bonus (an essentially optional one) thrown in for those who do so. Are you required to either repurpose it like that or remove the free bonus offer that would be sent to new subscribers?

The irony of this is that it requires websites that have a newsletter sign-up page like that to change it into a "newsletter sign-up page" where the newsletter sign-up part is optional. Which make you look kind of stupid, making a page that claims to be one thing but doesn't necessarily do what it says it's for.

Does this mean, in effect, that you may not lawfully provide any sort of incentive or reward for signing up for something (like a mailing list)? As long as it's very clear that some action is required before delivery of some thing, I don't see why this sort of thing should not be permitted? Would this fall under contract law? And as such, wouldn't such a contract be allowed and valid? Are mailing lists a special class of [service] that has special requirements like this? Or is it part of a broader category to which this requirement applies more generally?

Why is requiring the user to provide an email address before they can download a digital reward allowed but not requiring signing up to a mailing list? Why isn't it required that even the email address be optional to provide? (To answer my own question, probably because it's allowed to allow a user to request a specific thing to be sent via email, and an email address is required in order to fulfill that request. But...) It seems that the website could just provide a direct link to download it via HTTP/FTP/etc. as an option for users that chose not to provide an email address. (But should they be required to provide that option anytime they / just because they provide the option to have the same thing delivered via email?)

Answer

Looks like my question was answered below:

Explicit Form (where the purpose of the sign-up mechanism is unequivocal). So for example, in a scenario where your site has a pop-up window that invites users to sign up to your newsletter using a clear phrase such as: “Subscribe to our newsletter for access to discount vouchers and product updates!“, the affirmative action that the user performs by typing in their email address would be considered valid consent.

So the case I described, where it is made very clear that the incentive that is offered is conditional on subscribing, is listed as an exception to the general rule. That's good; it should be allowed.

I'm not sure I agree with this:

[the technical cookies] are explicitly requested by the user when they indicate that they would like to add the item to the cart.

The only thing they requested was that the item be held in a cart for them. They didn't explicitly request that cookies be used to store information about items in the cart. They most likely don't understand all of the options for how to store data like this, and certainly wouldn't know or expect specifically that cookies be used for this.

In fact, localStorage could be used instead. If it's a single-page app, then even that would be necessary; it could all be kept in page-local variables until they checked out (all on the same page); such that reloading the page would cause the cart data held in those variables to be lost.

It's not an abuse of power. It's free speech. It's protesting against an awful proposed law.

Why do they only send password matches if username also matches?? A password should be deemed compromised and never used again if the password is found in a breach/paste anywhere, even if in connection with a different username/email.

unidad_COVID2019

IMHO, re-opening classes is okay. Certainly better than duplicating an entire core Ruby class and giving it a silly, less-meaningful name. (Though I'm not sure he actually intended people to use Lax instead of Lazy. I think he was just showing how easy it is to implement Lazy from scratch in Ruby.)

The fact that thinking is the production of a human being derives from the necessity of knowing what an human being is. Descartes wants to answer the question: who am I. Thus he takes what seems to be the more material and certain thing: thinking. Then he says: I am something who thinks. But actually this is a paralogism.

I wanted to change this to "Y'all call learning".

Or a little more explicitly with 2Pac

https://youtu.be/rKQNcOI8KWE

This book is current from 2015 and is one stop shopping for technology integration in schools. Integrations and Blooms taxonomy theory, ISTE standards, pathways (yes, it is still a slow process), understanding about classroom set up when using technology and learning theories, online, web 2.0, teacher resources, multilingual tools, different screens, digital cameras, and COPPA, Privacy, and Copyright laws. If you are looking for a job in technology integration in schools this is a must read and resource manual. rating 10/10

This is one of my favorite articles about creating a faculty boot-camp for the adoption of technology in higher education. The article brings out the barriers and anxiety for educators in using techonology in the classroom. In addition, you learn how to incorporate learning theories in adult learner engagement. The boot-camp is three day's, follows "Knowles principles of adult learning," and included research, using online tools, and putting it all together. What is it? At the end they educators create an online course that they will use the following year! 9/10

This article presents how to build a technology learning community in support of three rural schools.It incorporates teacher development, and uses many important strategies in understanding success. I would use this article as reference for conducting a study to understand outcomes. The used processes include: Stages of Adoption Inventory classroom observations, the Questionnaire for Technology Integration, interviews, STAR evaluations surveys, teacher survey perceptions study on the impact of the project on student achievement, and force field analysis. Using professional learning communities is imperative in professional development, culture, and productivity. This article unfolds in detail a plan and the results, which could be adopted as a success for creating professional learning communities. Ratings 10/10

Yes, good thinking. Throw in a truthful fact or two. Impressive!

I hate this feeling. Its a feeling you cannot replace. I, myself use to fight with my parents all the time and it wasn't pleasant. I don't think fighting with anyone/parents will solve anything.

This is obviously done incorrectly in schools nowadays, referring to the large class sizes and common core putting restrictions on mostly everything. This raises the question, though, does homeschooling produce a better pedagogy? Or is it dependent on the specific educator?