1,586 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2025
  2. Mar 2025
    1. The composition of soil can vary dependingon its location. Different types of soil have specific characteristics,such as texture, colour, and mineral content

      "Different soil compositions help identify which geographic areas the suspect traveled through"

    1. if we want to achieve transformation what is crucial is that we work across four different levels and that would be Behavior change culture change system change and also work at the level of mindsets

      for - leverage point - activate 4 different levels - behavior change - cultural change - system change - mindset

    1. Reviewer #4 (Public review):

      Summary

      Pinho et al use in vivo calcium imaging and chemogenetic approaches to examine the involvement of hippocampal sub-regions across the different stages of a sensory preconditioning task in mice. They find clear evidence for sensory preconditioning in male but not female mice. They also find that, in the male mice, CaMKII-positive neurons in the dorsal hippocampus: (1) encode the audio-visual association that forms in stage 1 of the task, and (2) retrieve/express sensory preconditioned fear to the auditory stimulus at test. These findings are supported by evidence that ranges from incomplete to convincing. They will be valuable to researchers in the field of learning and memory.

      Abstract

      Please note that sensory preconditioning doesn't require the stage 1 stimuli to be presented repeatedly or simultaneously.

      "Finally, we combined our sensory preconditioning task with chemogenetic approaches to assess the role of these two hippocampal subregions in mediated learning."<br /> This implies some form of inhibition of hippocampal neurons in stage 2 of the protocol, as this is the only stage of the protocol that permits one to make statements about mediated learning. However, it is clear from what follows that the authors interrogate the involvement of hippocampal sub-regions in stages 1 and 3 of the protocol - not stage 2. As such, most statements about mediated learning throughout the paper are potentially misleading (see below for a further elaboration of this point). If the authors persist in using the term mediated learning to describe the response to a sensory preconditioned stimulus, they should clarify what they mean by mediated learning at some point in the introduction. Alternatively, they might consider using a different phrase such as "sensory preconditioned responding".

      Introduction

      "Low-salience" is used to describe stimuli such as tone, light, or odour that do not typically elicit responses that are of interest to experimenters. However, a tone, light, or odour can be very salient even though they don't elicit these particular responses. As such, it would be worth redescribing the "low-salience" stimuli in some other terms.

      "These higher-order conditioning processes, also known as mediated learning, can be captured in laboratory settings through sensory preconditioning procedures2,6-11."<br /> Higher-order conditioning and mediated learning are not interchangeable terms: e.g., some forms of second-order conditioning are not due to mediated learning. More generally, the use of mediated learning is not necessary for the story that the authors develop in the paper and could be replaced for accuracy and clarity. E.g., "These higher-order conditioning processes can be studied in the laboratory using sensory preconditioning procedures2,6-11."

      In reference to Experiment 2, it is stated that: "However, when light and tone were separated on time (Unpaired group), male mice were not able to exhibit mediated learning response (Figure 2B) whereas their response to the light (direct learning) was not affected (Figure 2D). On the other hand, female mice still present a lower but significant mediated learning response (Figure 2C) and normal direct learning (Figure 2E). Finally, in the No-Shock group, both male (Figure 2B and 2D) and female mice (Figure 2C and 2E) did not present either mediated or direct learning, which also confirmed that the exposure to the tone or light during Probe Tests do not elicit any behavioral change by themselves as the presence of the electric footshock is required to obtain a reliable mediated and direct learning responses."<br /> The absence of a difference between the paired and unpaired female mice should not be described as "significant mediated learning" in the latter. It should be taken to indicate that performance in the females is due to generalization between the tone and light. That is, there is no sensory preconditioning in the female mice. The description of performance in the No-shock group really shouldn't be in terms of mediated or direct learning: that is, this group is another control for assessing the presence of sensory preconditioning in the group of interest. As a control, there is no potential for them to exhibit sensory preconditioning, so their performance should not be described in a way that suggests this potential.

      Methods - Behavior

      I appreciate the reasons for testing the animals in a new context. This does, however, raise other issues that complicate the interpretation of any hippocampal engagement: e.g., exposure to a novel context may engage the hippocampus for exploration/encoding of its features - hence, it is engaged for retrieving/expressing sensory preconditioned fear to the tone. This should be noted somewhere in the paper given that one of its aims is to shed light on the broader functioning of the hippocampus in associative processes.

      This general issue - that the conditions of testing were such as to force engagement of the hippocampus - is amplified by two further features of testing with the tone. The first is the presence of background noise in the training context and its absence in the test context. The second is the fact that the tone was presented for 30 s in stage 1 and then continuously for 180s at test. Both changes could have contributed to the engagement of the hippocampus as they introduce the potential for discrimination between the tone that was trained and tested.

      Results - Behavior

      The suggestion of sex differences based on differences in the parameters needed to generate sensory preconditioning is interesting. Perhaps it could be supported through some set of formal analyses. That is, the data in supplementary materials may well show that the parameters needed to generate sensory preconditioning in males and females are not the same. However, there needs to be some form of statistical comparison to support this point. As part of this comparison, it would be neat if the authors included body weight as a covariate to determine whether any interactions with sex are moderated by body weight.

      What is the value of the data shown in Figure 1 given that there are no controls for unpaired presentations of the sound and light? In the absence of these controls, the experiment cannot have shown that "Female and male mice show mediated learning using an auditory-visual sensory preconditioning task" as implied by its title. Minimally, this experiment should be relabelled.

      "Altogether, this data confirmed that we successfully set up an LTSPC protocol in mice and that this behavioral paradigm can be used to further study the brain circuits involved in higher-order conditioning."<br /> Please insert the qualifier that LTSPC was successfully established in male mice. There is no evidence of LTSPC in female mice.

      Results - Brain

      "Notably, the inhibition of CaMKII-positive neurons in the dHPC (i.e. J60 administration in DREADD-Gi mice) during preconditioning (Figure 4B), but not before the Probe Test 1 (Figure 4B), fully blocked mediated, but not direct learning (Figure 4D)."<br /> The right panel of Figure 4B indicates no difference between the controls and Group DPC in the percent change in freezing from OFF to ON periods of the tone. How does this fit with the claim that CaMKII-positive neurons in the dorsal hippocampus regulate associative formation during the session of tone-light exposures in stage 1 of sensory preconditioning?

      Discussion

      "When low salience stimuli were presented separated on time or when the electric footshock was absent, mediated and direct learning were abolished in male mice. In female mice, although light and tone were presented separately during the preconditioning phase, mediated learning was reduced but still present, which implies that female mice are still able to associate the two low-salience stimuli."<br /> This doesn't quite follow from the results. The failure of the female unpaired mice to withhold their freezing to the tone should not be taken to indicate the formation of a light-tone association across the very long interval that was interpolated between these stimulus presentations. It could and should be taken to indicate that, in female mice, freezing conditioned to the light simply generalized to the tone (i.e., these mice could not discriminate well between the tone and light).

      "Indeed, our data suggests that when hippocampal activity is modulated by the specific manipulation of hippocampal subregions, this brain region is not involved during retrieval."<br /> Does this relate to the results that are shown in the right panel of Figure 4B, where there is no significant difference between the different groups? If so, how does it fit with the results shown in the left panel of this figure, where differences between the groups are observed?

      "In line with this, the inhibition of CaMKII-positive neurons from the dorsal hippocampus, which has been shown to project to the restrosplenial cortex56, blocked the formation of mediated learning."<br /> Is this a reference to the findings shown in Figure 4B and, if so, which of the panels exactly? That is, one panel appears to support the claim made here while the other doesn't. In general, what should the reader make of data showing the percent change in freezing from stimulus OFF to stimulus ON periods?

    1. so, normally 315 of Reunification Treaty prevents acts commited on East German soil prior to reunification from being punished, if they were not punishable under East German Law (kinda like our warunek podwójnej karalaności)

      BUT, here: - immunity does not apply where there was already West German Law (west german law applied to crimes on foreign soil if): 1. the acts are commited against German 2. the person that committed them becomes a resident of WG or comes to WG

      prof. Samson argues that EG became part of WG, so their law is applicable 7(2) (similarly, the people who were shot, were Germans, so 7(1))

      BUT it's a stretch, because EGs were considered foreigners by WG

  3. southtexascollege.blackboard.com southtexascollege.blackboard.com
    1. And in this flea our two bloods mingled be;

      The act of sharing blood in intimate and due to that, the speaker tells the listener that a "physical barrier" is, at this point, unnecessary.

  4. Feb 2025
    1. Reviewer #4 (Public review):

      Summary:

      The structural mechanism of anion permeation through the open CFTR pore has remained unresolved and is subject to ongoing debate. That is because even in CFTR structures obtained under conditions that normally maximally activate the channel (phosphorylation + ATP + non-hydrolytic mutations + potentiator drugs) a bottleneck region in the pore, too narrow to allow passage of hydrated chloride ions, is observed.

      The present study uses molecular dynamics (MD) simulations initiated from such "quasi-open" states to address local conformational dynamics of the pore. The authors conclude that the quasi-open structure stably relaxes to a fully open conformation on the sub-microsecond time scale. They provide a detailed analysis of this fully open structure and of the mechanism of chloride permeation. They conclude that two major exit pathways (a central and a peripheral) exist for chloride ions, and that the ions remain near-fully hydrated throughout the pore: chloride-protein interactions displace only 1-2 waters from the first solvation shell. Furthermore, the simulations provide some hints for conformational changes involved in gating.

      Strengths:

      The findings are interpreted in the context of the large body of published functional studies on CFTR permeation properties, and caveats are adequately discussed.

      Weaknesses:

      The conclusions on gating would benefit from further discussions. In particular, a fair comparison of the timescale at which channel gating happens, and that of the MD simulations would strengthen the manuscript.

    1. Reviewer #5 (Public review):

      Summary:

      The researchers examined selection across multiple levels, including gene expression, biological processes, and regulatory mechanisms, with a particular focus on comparing selection between different environmental conditions. They further explored potential evolutionary mechanisms. This is made possible with a comprehensive dataset comprising gene expression data from 130 accessions with three replicates collected in two environments in the field, genomic data from 125 genotypes, and associated physiological traits. The findings have significant implications for understanding the evolution of stress adaptation, and the identified possible genes and pathways for further investigation.

      The researchers began by focusing on the selection of gene expression across two environments, comparing the number of genes under selection and the effect sizes, as well as examining how selection in each environment acts on the same individual genes. They then expanded their analysis to consider selection in biological processes, investigating the relationships between selection acting on individual genes within processes and selection acting among different processes.<br /> Additionally, they explored selection at the organismal level by examining traits.

      The study further transitioned from analyzing individual gene expression to investigating gene-gene interactions. They briefly examined correlation variation among gene pairs between the two conditions, identifying pairs with rewired interactions that suggest potential selection on gene regulation or the effect of rewiring on tolerance. The researchers then delved into the genetic architecture underlying these patterns by mapping eQTLs. Their comparison of cis- and trans-eQTLs revealed that trans-eQTLs were more variable across conditions. Notably, they identified hotspots representing master regulators that possibly underlie the greater variability of trans-eQTLs across environments. They further discovered that trans-eQTLs are generally under purifying selection (particularly in salt conditions), while cis-eQTLs are under balancing selection, exhibiting higher nucleotide diversity. As for how cis- and trans-eQTL effects combine at the level of individual genes, more are found to be reinforced and the hypothesis of genetic fixation on cis- and trans-eQTL effects combination is further tested.

      Strengths:

      A key strength of this study is its comprehensive approach, extending beyond the analysis of gene expression to include gene-gene interactions, genetic architectures, and selections of genetic regulation factors. The exploration of gene expression selection through its connection with fitness, as introduced in the researchers' previous work, provides valuable insights into the role of gene expression in adaptation. The study investigates selection across multiple levels of biological responses, including individual gene expression, genes associated with biological processes, gene-gene interactions, and the underlying genetic architecture. The experimental design enables a direct comparison of selection between control and salinity conditions, which sheds light on the effects of stress on selection and the dynamics of adaptation to stress. Additionally, the manuscript is well-written, with a clear connection to current literature. The discussion effectively integrates findings with broader implications, making it a satisfying read.

      Weaknesses:

      The lack of formal testing for environment-specific selections (e.g., selection of gene expression specifically in salinity stress, PCs, or traits) is a major limitation, as previous reviewers have flagged. Explicit tests of eQTLs variation between conditions are introduced, so similar formal tests should also be introduced in selection sections. For example, a formal test of selections of gene expression might be helpful to solve variance/mean- standardization concerns between two environments.

      Additionally, some aspects of the analysis appear somewhat arbitrary and could benefit from further sensitivity testing. Line 203: The concern about bias in detecting more CN than AP, as mentioned by the authors and previously flagged by reviewers, does not seem fully resolved with the current methods given the arbitrary cut-off. Incorporating additional tests suggesting the conclusion is insensitive to the cutoff would be very helpful. Similar is the classification of genes into compensatory and reinforcing categories based on 60% of individuals as a cutoff.

      While this study focuses on gene regulation, its connection with the selection of gene expression and biological pathways is not well integrated. In particular, the discovery of eQTLs is not explicitly linked to gene expression selection or biological pathways, leaving this relationship underexplored. Suggestive comments: Currently the summarization of selection is based on eQTLs. It would be interesting to also summarize the selection patterns identified from previous sections based on genes being cis/trans-regulated. Moreover, it might be interesting to see if there is more loss or gain of eQTLs under salt stress and their functions. The current results mentioned variations of eQTLs but not clear if they are loss or gain. E.g., one way is to identify genes related to cis and trans-eQTLs and see their correlation changes with genes being regulated using CILP (also as a way to informatively narrow down gene pairs for CILP).

      Similarly, the section on selection at the organismal trait level appears disconnected from the rest of the analysis (e.g., if it is not tested to be related to other features, mentioning why it might not be related would be helpful). Admittedly, the discussion of how biological processes discovered at different levels integrate together is helpful.

      Other comments: given there is no comparison between loss of coherence (correlations) and gain of coherence under salinity stress to show the dominant role of decoherence, maybe need to also discuss the genes and processes related to the gain of coherence? This is because the understanding of activation (gain of coherence) of some regulations/processes under stress conditions could also be interesting. It is not clear if decoherence (e.g., lines 293-296) refers to significant correlation changes or just loss of the correlation in salinity stress.

  5. Jan 2025
    1. Returning to Bevan’s brilliant question, today it is easier to see how wealth persuades poverty to give up its freedom

      for - key insight / quote - source - article - Le Monde - Musk, Trump and the Broligarch's novel hyper-weapon - Yanis Varoufakis - 2025, Jan 4

      key insight / quote - (see below) - Returning to Bevan’s brilliant question, today it is easier to see how - wealth persuades poverty to give up its freedom and, instead, - to serve the broligarchs-in-charge: via their cloud capital - that has a capacity, - unlike any hitherto form of capital or government department, - to shape our behaviour - automatically and - directly. - Nothing short of a revolution can restore any hope of personal agency, - let alone of democracy.

    2. cloud capital performs five roles that used to be beyond capital’s capacities

      for - five roles of cloud capital - source - article - Le Monde - Musk, Trump and the Broligarch's novel hyper-weapon - Yanis Varoufakis - 2025, Jan 4 - monopolizes the attention economy - manufactures desire - sells directly to us that which it has made us desire - controls labor - creates a system of free voluntary behavior to sustain the behavioral modification system, turning us into cloud serfs

    3. Instead, it comprises machines manufactured so as to modify human behaviour. These produced means of behavioural modification train us to train them to determine what we want.

      for - progress trap - cloud capital - behavioral modification - source - article - Le Monde - Musk, Trump and the Broligarch's novel hyper-weapon - Yanis Varoufakis - 2025, Jan 4

    4. there is a superpower, a hyper-weapon, that the broligarchy possess today that their Big Business and Wall Street predecessors did not. It is a form of capital that never existed until recently: cloud capital

      for - comparison: robber barons of the past and today's broligarchs - cloud capital / technofeudalism - source - article - Le Monde - Musk, Trump and the Broligarch's novel hyper-weapon - Yanis Varoufakis - 2025, Jan 4

    5. Are we not doing the same now, appearing astounded that a bunch of oligarchs are going through the same revolving doors connecting Big Business and government?

      for - relevant quote - the more things change, the more they remain the same - seems to apply to this statement - source - article - Le Monde - Musk, Trump and the Broligarch's novel hyper-weapon - Yanis Varoufakis - 2025, Jan 4

    6. Sovereign Individual.

      for - further research - Oligarch's favorite book - The Sovereign Individual - Author - James Dale Davidson and William Rees-Mogg - source - article - Le Monde - Musk, Trump and the Broligarch's novel hyper-weapon - Yanis Varoufakis - 2025, Jan 4

    7. For a few crumbs off their table, that they ploughed into the Trump campaign, the Big Tech brotherhood are in the process of receiving three amazing gifts

      for - Trumps three gifts to lobbyists - article - Le Monde - Musk, Trump and the Broligarch's novel hyper-weapon - Yanis Varoufakis - 2025, Jan 4 - 1. Huge government contracts - 2. Deregulation will enable a free-for-all - 3. State-sanctioned power over labor

    8. Aneurin Bevan

      for - further research - Aneurin Bevan - 1952 - liberal democracy's greatest paradox - How does wealth manage to persuade poverty to use its political freedom to keep wealth in power? - source - article - Le Monde - Musk, Trump and the Broligarch's novel hyper-weapon - Yanis Varoufakis - 2025, Jan 4 - inequality - elites - source - article - Le Monde - Musk, Trump and the Broligarch's novel hyper-weapon - Yanis Varoufakis - 2025, Jan 4

    9. How does wealth manage to persuade poverty to use its political freedom to keep wealth in power?

      for - key insight - inequality - elites - How does wealth manage to persuade poverty to use its political freedom to keep wealth in power? - source - article - Le Monde - Musk, Trump and the Broligarch's novel hyper-weapon - Yanis Varoufakis - 2025, Jan 4

    10. for - article - Le Monde - Musk, Trump and the Broligarch's novel hyper-weapon - Yanis Varoufakis - 2025, Jan 4

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

  6. Dec 2024
    1. for - Substack article - The Cosmo-Local Plan for our Next Civilization - Michel Bauwens - 2024, Dec 20 - adjacency - web 3 and Blockchain / crypto technology - communities engaged in regeneration and relocalization - tinkering at the edge - missed opportunity - cosmolocal strategy as leverage point - safe and just cross scale translation of earth system boundaries - Tipping Point Festival - Web 4 - Indyweb

      Summary adjacency between - web 3 and crypto / Blockchain technology - communities engaged in regeneration and relocalization - tinkering at the edge - missed opportunity - cosmolocal lens and framework as a leverage point for synthesis - cosmolocal projects as leverage points - cross scale translated safe and just earth system boundaries as necessary cosmolocal accounting system - meme: sync global, act local - new relationship - This article explores the untapped potential and leverage point offered by recognising a new adjacency and concomitant synthesis of - globalising Web 3 and crypto/Blockchain technology - communities engaged in regenerative and relocation interventions - The fragmentation between these areas keeps activists working in each respective one - tinkering at the edge - severely constraining their potential impact - This is a case of the whole Berlin car greater than the sun of its parts - By joining forces in a global, strategic and systemic way, each can achieve fast more through their mutual support - A cosmolocal lens offers a perspective and framework that makes joining forces make sense<br /> - Projects that recognize that the adjacency between - the globalizing technologies of web 3 and Blockchains and - interventions at the local community level - offer a significant leverage point to bottom up efforts to drive a rapid transition are themselves a leverage point - In this regard, incorporation of an equitable accounting system such as safe and just earth system boundaries that can be cross scale translated to - bioregional, - city and - community, district and ward scale - are an important cosmolocal component of a system designed for rapid transition - Global bottom up community scale events such as the Tipping Point Festival can help rapidly advocate for a cosmolocal lens, framework and strategy - At the same time, Web 4 technology that's goes beyond decentralising into people-centered can contribute another dimension to humanizing technology

      Addendum - 2024, Dec 26 - added a comment to the actual substack page - My substack comment makes commenters of the article aware that we have a public hypothes.is discussion going on in parallel. - This makes the hitherto invisible discussion visible to them

    1. for - climate crisis - Medium article - climate communication - how climate change is framed to disempower you - Joe Brewer - 2024, Dec 4 - from - post - LinkedIn - climate crisis - climate communication - climate change discourse has been framed to disempower us - changing the story - so that grassroots, bottom-up initiatives can restore health to ecosystems - Joe Brewer, 2024, Dec 4 - from - Resilience article - A 'Transcender Manifesto" for a world beyond capitalism. A seed.

      summary - A good article that offers an explanation of how language has potentially led the public to rely on top down actors to provide solutions to the climate crisis - Joe Brewer draws on his background as a frame analyst to analyse the role language and cognitive linguistics has played in framing the discourse on the climate crisis - He claims that this has led the public to look to elite top down actors to provide the solutions - This had led to a disempowerment of the public in actively participating in contributing too solutions - Indeed it could be why we have a sleeping giant - Reframing the story could have the opposite effect of inspiring people's to wake up and take action to regenerate nature within and surrounding the communities where people live.

      from - post - LinkedIn - climate crisis - climate communication - climate change discourse has been framed to disempower us - changing the story - so that grassroots, bottom-up initiatives can restore health to ecosystems - Joe Brewer, 2024, Dec 4 - https://hyp.is/yvHstLfVEe-cyRN4sq09Ow/www.linkedin.com/posts/joe-brewer-4957925_earlier-this-week-i-lived-into-an-important-activity-7270035170328494080-E7Cq/ - from - Resilience article - A 'Transcender Manifesto" for a world beyond capitalism. A seed. - https://hyp.is/0NOdtLiREe--pwPfB1SmdA/www.resilience.org/stories/2024-04-18/a-transcender-manifesto-for-a-world-beyond-capitalism-a-seed/

    1. What I did this week was sit down and record a video explaining how the climate change discourse has been framed to disempower us -- and what we can do about it by focusing on grassroots organizing to restore health to our local ecosystems

      for - post - LinkedIn - climate crisis - climate communication - climate change discourse has been framed to disempower us - changing the story - so that grassroots, bottom-up initiatives can restore health to ecosystems - Joe Brewer, 2024, Dec 4 - to - Medium article - How Climate Change is framed to Disempower you - Joe Brewer - 2024, Dec 4

      to - Medium article - How Climate Change is framed to Disempower you - Joe Brewer - 2024, Dec 4 - https://hyp.is/XoQoRLfVEe-ZMIMjZheLLA/medium.com/@joe_brewer/how-climate-change-is-framed-to-disempower-you-01d871413487

    1. Effective Access to Justice

      Fortalecer la responsabilidad contextual para la no discriminación en los sistemas de IA

      Empoderar a los organismos de igualdad para que inicien acciones

      Aliviar la carga de la prueba para los demandantes

    2. the recommendations focus on four categories: in-clusive design and democratic innovation, meaningful participation in AI governance, transparency and account-ability for harm prevention, and effective access to justice.

      Categorías:

      1. Diseño inclusivo e innovación democrática

      2. Participación significativa en la gobernanza de la IA

      3. Transparencia y rendición de cuentas para la prevención de daños

      4. Acceso efectivo a la justicia

    1. Engage, enable or empoweridentified stakeholders

      Puntos de acción

      Asignar un presupuesto para los costos de participación. Incluir líneas presupuestarias específicas para cubrir los costos de participación de representantes de grupos marginados, como compensación por su tiempo y experiencia, y adaptaciones razonables para garantizar la accesibilidad (por ejemplo, intérpretes de lengua de señas, intérpretes guía para personas sordociegas, intérpretes de lenguas indígenas).

      Al facilitar la participación, considera las dinámicas de poder específicas del contexto, incluyendo género, expresión de género, edad, raza, clase, cultura, identidad, habilidades y lenguaje, para garantizar una inclusión efectiva. Además, crea incentivos que motiven a los actores privados a involucrarse activamente en el diseño, desarrollo y gobernanza de sistemas de IA inclusivos.

  7. Nov 2024
    1. Reviewer #4 (Public Review):

      Summary:

      In their revised manuscript "Conformational dynamics of a nicotinic receptor neurotransmitter binding site," Singh and colleagues present molecular docking and dynamics simulations to explore the initial conformational changes associated with agonist binding in the muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, in context with the extensive experimental literature on this system. Their central findings are of a consistently preferred pose for agonists upon initial association with a resting channel, followed by a dramatic rotation of the ligand and contraction of a critical loop over the binding site. Principal component analysis also suggests the formation of an intermediate complex, not yet captured in structural studies. Binding free energy estimates are consistent with the evolution of a higher-affinity complex following agonist binding, with a ligand efficiency notably similar to experimental values. Snapshot comparisons provide a structural rationale for these changes on the basis of pocket volume, hydration, and rearrangement of key residues at the subunit interface.

      Strengths:

      Docking results are clearly presented and remarkably consistent. Simulations are produced in triplicate with each of four different agonists, providing an informative basis for internal validation. They identify an intriguing transition in ligand pose, not well documented in experimental structures, and potentially applicable to mechanistic or even pharmacological modeling of this and related receptor systems. The paper seems a notable example of integrating quantitative structure-function analysis with systematic computational modeling and simulations, likely applicable to the wider journal audience.

      Weaknesses:

      The response to the initial review is somewhat disappointing, declining in some places to implement suggested clarifications, and propagating apparent errors in at least one table (Fig 2-source data 1). Some legends (e.g. Fig 2-supplement 4, Fig 3, Fig 4) and figure shadings (e.g. Fig 2-supplement 2, Fig 6-supplement 2) remain unclear. Apparent convergence of agonist-docked simulations towards a desensitized state (l 184) is difficult to interpret in absence of comparative values with other states, systems, etc. In more general concerns, aside from the limited timescales (200 ns) that do not capture global rearrangements, it is not obvious that landscapes constructed on two principal components to identify endpoint and intermediate states (Fig 3) are highly robust or reproducible, nor whether they relate consistently to experimental structures.

    1. Reviewer #3 (Public review):

      Summary:

      This study investigated motor system adaptation to new environments through modifications in redundant body movements. Utilizing a novel bimanual stick-manipulation task, participants controlled a virtual stick to reach targets, focusing on how tip-movement direction perturbations affected tip movement and stick-tilt adaptation. The findings revealed a consistent strategy among participants who flexibly adjusted the tilt angle of the stick in response to errors. The adaptation patterns were influenced by physical space relationships, which guided the motor system's selection of movement patterns. This study underscores the motor system's adaptability through changes in redundant body movement patterns.

      Strengths:

      This study introduces an innovative bimanual stick manipulation task to explore motor system adaptation to novel environments through alterations in redundant body movement patterns. It also expands the use of endpoint robots in motor control studies.

      Weaknesses:

      The generalizability of the findings is limited. Future work may strengthen the present study's findings by examining whether the observed relationships hold for different stick lengths (i.e., varying hand positions along the virtual stick) or when reaching targets to the left and right of the starting position, not just at varying angles along one side. Additionally, a more comprehensive review of the existing literature on redundant systems, rather than primarily focusing on the lack of redundancy in endpoint-reaching tasks, would have strengthened this study. While the novel task expands the use of endpoint robots in motor control studies, its utility in exploring broader aspects of motor control and learning may be constrained.

    1. each one of those stages there's four St stages and we can say that there's equal amount of stages above it has a sacred version and and a version that the sacred is lost

      for - wisdom stages - 4 middle school stages and - 4 high school stages - John Churchill

    2. the soul can use the mind right and the mind is using the emotional body and so so now the the the journey is becoming more and more integrated

      for - paraphrase - Buddhist framework - 4 turnings - 4 stages of initiation - John Churchill

      paraphrase - Buddhist framework - 4 turnings - 4 stages of initiation - John Churchill - The fourth stage of "soul" - interdependent origination - systems thinking - can make use the knowledge of the third stage "mind" - which in turn uses the knowledge of the second stage "emotional body" - which uses the knowledge of the first stage "body"

  8. Oct 2024
    1. 1.
      1. 定义和作用: 一个证明就像正确运行的代码,必须在逻辑上严谨且能被他人理解。

      2. 证明的标准: 一个好的数学证明应该做到两点:

      3. 正确性:每一步推理都必须符合逻辑,因为如果证明不正确,就不能称为“证明”。
      4. 易于理解:在确保正确的前提下,证明应该尽可能容易理解。 证明的结构:

      5. 人类阅读的特殊性: 证明是写给人类阅读的,所以允许一定的常识性和简单的推测。比如,数学家可能会使用“显然”之类的词汇,但在初学证明时,建议避免这类词,以免产生错误的假设。

      6. 符号和文字的平衡: 证明既可以用符号也可以用文字表达,甚至可以两者结合。重要的是逻辑清晰,而不一定要用大量符号来显得“专业”。

    1. Reviewer #4 (Public review):

      The authors apply what I gather is a novel methodology titled "Multi-gradient Permutation Survival Analysis" to identify genes that are robustly associated with prognosis ("GEARs") using tumour expression data from 15 cancer types available in the TCGA. The resulting lists of GEARs are then interrogated for biological insights using a range of techniques including connectivity and gene enrichment analysis.

      I reviewed this paper primarily from a statistical perspective. Evidently, an impressive amount of work has been conducted, and concisely summarised, and great effort has been undertaken to add layers of insight to the findings. I am no stranger to what an undertaking this would have been. My primary concern, however, is that the novel statistical procedure proposed, and applied to identify the gene lists, as far as I can tell offers no statistical error control or quantification. Consequently, we have no sense of what proportion of the highlighted GEAR genes and networks are likely to just be noise.

      Major comments:

      (1) The main methodology used to identify the GEAR genes, "Multi-gradient Permutation Survival Analysis" does not formally account for multiple testing and offers no formal error control. Meaning we are left with no understanding of what the family-wise (aka type 1) error rate is among the GEAR lists, nor the false discovery rate. I would generally recommend against the use of any feature selection methodology that does not provide some form of error quantification and/or control because otherwise we do not know if we are encouraging our colleagues and/or readers to put resources into lists of genes that contain more noise than not. There are numerous statistical techniques available these days that offer error control, including for lists of p-values from arbitrary sets of tests (see expansion on this and some review references below).

      (2) Similarly, no formal significance measure was used to determine which of the strongest "SAS" connections to include as edges in the "Core Survival Network".

      (3) There is, as far as I could tell, no validation of any identified gene lists using an independent dataset external to the presently analysed TCGA data.

      (4) There are quite a few places in the methods section where descriptions were not clear (e.g. elements of matrices referred to without defining what the columns and rows are), and I think it would be quite challenging to re-produce some aspects of the procedures as currently described (more detailed notes below).

      (5) There is a general lack of statistical inference offered. For example, throughout the gene enrichment section of the results, I never saw it stated whether the pathways highlighted are enriched to a significant degree or not.

    1. Reviewer #4 (Public review):

      Summary:

      The authors have performed endoscopic calcium recordings of individual CeA neuron responses to food and shock, as well as to cues predicting food and shock. They claim that a majority of neurons encode valence, with a substantial minority encoding salience.

      Strengths:

      The use of endoscopic imaging is valuable, as it provides the ability to resolve signals from single cells, while also being able to track these cells across time. The recordings appear well-executed, and employ a sophisticated circular shifting analysis to avoid statistical errors caused by correlations between neighboring image pixels.

      Weaknesses:

      My main critique is that the authors didn't fully test whether neurons encode valence. While it is true that they found CeA neurons responding to stimuli that have positive or negative value, this by itself doesn't indicate that valence is the primary driver of neural activity. For example, they report that a majority of CeA neurons respond selectively to either the positive or negative US, and that this is evidence for "type I" valence encoding. However, it could also be the case that these neurons simply discriminate between motivationally relevant stimuli in a manner unrelated to valence per se. A simple test of this would be to check if neural responses generalize across more than one type of appetitive or aversive stimulus, but this was not done. The closest the authors came was to note that a small number of neurons respond to CS cues, of which some respond to the corresponding US in the same direction. This is relegated to the supplemental figures (3 and 4), and it is not noted whether the the same-direction CS-US neurons are also valence-encoding with respect to different USs. For example, are the neurons excited by CS-food and US-food also inhibited by shock? If so, that would go a long way toward classifying at least a few neurons as truly encoding valence in a generalizable way.

      A second and related critique is that, although the authors correctly point out that definitions of salience and valence are sometimes confused in the existing literature, they then go on themselves to use the terms very loosely. For example, the authors define these terms in such a way that every neuron that responds to at least one stimulus is either salience or valence-encoding. This seems far too broad, as it makes essentially unfalsifiable their assertion that the CeA encodes some mixture of salience and valence. I already noted above that simply having different responses to food and shock does not qualify as valence-encoding. It also seems to me that having same-direction responses to these two stimuli similarly does not quality a neuron as encoding salience. Many authors define salience as being related to the ability of a stimulus to attract attention (which is itself a complex topic). However, the current paper does not acknowledge whether they are using this, or any other definition of salience, nor is this explicitly tested, e.g. by comparing neural response magnitudes to any measure of attention.

      The impression I get from the authors' data is that CeA neurons respond to motivationally relevant stimuli, but in a way that is possibly more complex than what the authors currently imply. At the same time, they appear to have collected a large and high-quality dataset that could profitably be made available for additional analyses by themselves and/or others.

      Lastly, the use of 10 daily sessions of training with 20 trials each seems rather low to me. In our hands, Pavlovian training in mice requires considerably more trials in order to effectively elicit responses to the CS. I wonder if the relatively sparse training might explain the relative lack of CS responses?

  9. Sep 2024
    1. imasTan dakavSirebiT, Tu rogor SeiZle-ba politikaSi CarTuli qalebis mimarTZaladobis prevencia, kvlevis monawi-leTa nawili acxadebs, rom miuxedavadgenderuli Tanasworobis sabWosa daombudsmenis monawileobisa ZaladobisprevenciisTvis Sesabamisi politikisada meqanizmebis SemuSavebaSi, es muSaobayovelTvis efeqturi ar aris. dabalia Za-ladobis SemTxvevebis oficialuri orga-noebisTvis Setyobinebis maCvenebelic daSetyobinebis SemTxvevaSic ki saqme, ume-tesad, ar gamoZiebula da arc damnaSavee-bi dasjilan.

      მიუხედავად ოფიციალური ორგანოებისა და პასუხისმგებელი პირების მხრიდან ამ პრობლემის უგუვებელყოფის,აუცილებელია ქალებმა კვლავ განაგრძონ ბრძოლა საკუთარი უფლებების დასაცავად და მყარად მოიკიდონ ფეხი პლიტიკურ სფეროში,მიუცედავად არსებული წინააღმდეგობებისა,რადგან დანებება წახალისებაა იმ საზოგადოების,რომელიც შრომას ყოფს გენდერულად და არაფასებს ქალის შესაძლებლობას.

    1. The remainder of this Commission is organised into four parts

      for - safe and just earth system boundaries - translations and transformations - 4 parts

      earth system boundaries - translations and transformations - 4 parts - part 1 - theoretical framework - part 2 - quantification of - safe and just ESB, - which ones are transgressed - who are the victims - safe and just corridor - base - ceiling - for timeframe - present - 2050 - part 3 - translating - safe and just ESB - approaches - challenges - enabling conditions - to - cities - businesses

    1. Your brain cannot tell whether it is real or imaginary, so imagine and think in "crazy" creative ways to get your brain to start creating something you might not have without thinking in an almost unrealistic way.

    1. Reviewer #4 (Public Review):

      Summary:

      With their 'CMR-replay' model, Zhou et al. demonstrate that the use of spontaneous neural cascades in a context-maintenance and retrieval (CMR) model significantly expands the range of captured memory phenomena.

      Strengths:

      The proposed model compellingly outperforms its CMR predecessor and, thus, makes important strides towards understanding the empirical memory literature, as well as highlighting a cognitive function of replay.

      Weaknesses:

      Competing accounts of replay are acknowledged but there are no formal comparisons and only CMR-replay predictions are visualized. Indeed, other than the CMR model, only one alternative account is given serious consideration: A variant of the 'Dyna-replay' architecture, originally developed in the machine learning literature (Sutton, 1990; Moore & Atkeson, 1993) and modified by Mattar et al (2018) such that previously experienced event-sequences get replayed based on their relevance to future gain. Mattar et al acknowledged that a realistic Dyna-replay mechanism would require a learned representation of transitions between perceptual and motor events, i.e., a 'cognitive map'. While Zhou et al. note that the CMR-replay model might provide such a complementary mechanism, they emphasize that their account captures replay characteristics that Dyna-replay does not (though it is unclear to what extent the reverse is also true).

      Another important consideration, however, is how CMR replay compares to alternative mechanistic accounts of cognitive maps. For example, Recurrent Neural Networks are adept at detecting spatial and temporal dependencies in sequential input; these networks are being increasingly used to capture psychological and neuroscientific data (e.g., Zhang et al, 2020; Spoerer et al, 2020), including hippocampal replay specifically (Haga & Fukai, 2018). Another relevant framework is provided by Associative Learning Theory, in which bidirectional associations between static and transient stimulus elements are commonly used to explain contextual and cue-based phenomena, including associative retrieval of absent events (McLaren et al, 1989; Harris, 2006; Kokkola et al, 2019). Without proper integration with these modeling approaches, it is difficult to gauge the innovation and significance of CMR-replay, particularly since the model is applied post hoc to the relatively narrow domain of rodent maze navigation.

  10. Aug 2024
    1. Der südkoreanische Verfassungsgerichtshof hat die Regierung des Landes dazu verurteilt ein Klimschutzgesetz vorzulegen, das auch für 2031-2049 verpflichtende Ziele für die Reduktion der Emissionen vorgibt. Andernfalls würden die verfassungsmäßigen Rechte der jüngeren Generation beeinträchtigt. Das Verfahren hatte 2020 mit einer Klage der Gruppe Youth 4 Climate Action begonnen. https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/aug/29/south-korea-court-climate-law-violates-rights-future-generations

    1. Reviewer #4 (Public Review):

      The authors report the role of the Piruvate Kinase M2 (PKM2) enzyme nuclear translocation as fundamental in the activation of astrocytes in a model of autoimmune encephalitis (EAE). They show that astrocytes, activated through culturing in EAE splenocytes medium, increase their nuclear PKM2 with a consequent activation of NFkB and STAT3 pathways. Prevention of PKM2 nuclear translocation decreases astrocyte counteracts this activation. The authors found that the E3 ubiquitin ligase TRIM21 interacts with PKM2 and promotes its nuclear translocation. In vivo, either silencing of TRIM21 or inhibition of PKM2 nuclear translocation ameliorates the severity of the disease in the EAE model.

      Strengths

      This work contributes to the knowledge of the complex action of the PKM2 enzyme in the context of an autoimmune-neurological disease, highlighting its nuclear role and a novel partner, TRIM21, promoting its nuclear translocation. In vivo amelioration of the pathological signs through inhibition of either of the two, PKM2 and TRIM21, provides a novel rationale for therapeutic targeting.

      Weaknesses

      I believe that the major weakness is the fact that TRIM21 is known to have per se many roles in autoimmune and immune pathways and some of the effects observed might be due to a PKM2-independent action. Some of the experiments to link the two proteins, besides their interaction, are not completely clarifying the issue. On top of that, the in vivo experiments address the role of TRIM21 and the nuclear localisation of PKM2 independently, thus leaving the matter unsolved.

      In general, the conclusions of the manuscript are supported by the reported results. The points to be addressed in future are the assessment of PKM2 as substrate of TRIM21 ubiquitin ligase activity and the proof of the epistatic relationship of TRIM21 and PKM2 in astrocyte activation. However, the data surely open novel directions to follow for the understanding of multiple sclerosis and related pathologies.

    1. Reviewer #4 (Public Review):

      The manuscript examines how patterns of selection on gene expression differ between a normal field environment and a field environment with elevated salinity based on transcript abundances obtained from leaves of a diverse panel of rice germplasm. In addition, the manuscript also maps expression QTL (eQTL) that explains variation in each environment. One highlight from the mapping is that a small group of trans-mapping regulators explains some gene expression variation for large sets of transcripts in each environment. The overall scope of the datasets is impressive, combining large field studies that capture information about fecundity, gene expression, and trait variation at multiple sites. The finding related to patterns indicating increased LD among eQTLs that have cis-trans compensatory or reinforcing effects is interesting in the context of other recent work finding patterns of epistatic selection. However, other analyses in the manuscript are less compelling or do not make the most of the value of collected data. Revisions are also warranted to improve the precision with which field-specific terminology is applied and the language chosen when interpreting analytical findings.

      Selection of gene expression:<br /> One strength of the dataset is that gene expression and fecundity were measured for the same genotypes in multiple environments. However, the selection analyses are largely conducted within environments. The addition of phenotypic selection analyses that jointly analyze gene expression across environments and or selection on reaction norms would be worthwhile.

      Gene expression trade-offs:<br /> The terminology and possibly methods involved in the section on gene expression trade-offs need amendment. I specifically recommend discontinuing reference to the analysis presented as an analysis of antagonistic pleiotropy (rather than more general trade-offs) because pleiotropy is defined as a property of a genotype, not a phenotype. Gene expression levels are a molecular phenotype, influenced by both genotype and the environment. By conducting analyses of selection within environments as reported, the analysis does not account for the fact that the distribution of phenotypic values, the fitness surface, or both may differ across environments. Thus, this presents a very different situation than asking whether the genotypic effect of a QTL on fitness differs across environments, which is the context in which the contrasting terms antagonistic pleiotropy and conditional neutrality have been traditionally applied. A more interesting analysis would be to examine whether the covariance of phenotype with fitness has truly changed between environments or whether the phenotypic distribution has just shifted to a different area of a static fitness surface.

      Biological processes under selection / Decoherence: PCs are likely not the most ideal way to cluster genes to generate consolidated metrics for a selection gradient analysis. Because individual genes will contribute to multiple PCs, the current fractional majority-rule method applied to determine whether a PC is under direct or indirect selection for increased or decreased expression comes across as arbitrary and with the potential for double-counting genes. A gene co-expression network analysis could be more appropriate, as genes only belong to one module and one can examine how selection is acting on the eigengene of a co-expression module. Building gene co-expression modules would also provide a complementary and more concrete framework for evaluating whether salinity stress induces "decoherence" and which functional groups of genes are most impacted.

      Selection of traits:<br /> Having paired organismal and molecular trait data is a strength of the manuscript, but the organismal trait data are underutilized. The manuscript as written only makes weak indirect inferences based on GO categories or assumed gene functions to connect selection at the organismal and molecular levels. Stronger connections could be made for instance by showing a selection of co-expression module eigengene values that are also correlated with traits that show similar patterns of selection, or by demonstrating that GWAS hits for trait variation co-localize to cis-mapping eQTL.

      Genetic architecture of gene expression variation:<br /> The descriptive statistics of the eQTL analysis summarize counts of eQTLs observed in each environment, but these numbers are not broken down to the molecular trait level (e.g., what are the median and range of cis- and trans-eQTLs per gene). In addition, genetic architecture is a combination of the numbers and relative effect sizes of the QTLs. It would be useful to provide information about the relative distributions of phenotypic variance explained by the cis- vs. trans- eQTLs and whether those distributions vary by environment. The motivation for examining patterns of cis-trans compensation specifically for the results obtained under high salinity conditions is unclear to me. If the lines sampled have predominantly evolved under low salinity conditions and the hypothesis being evaluated relates to historical experience of stabilizing selection, then my intuition is that evaluating the eQTL patterns under normal conditions provides the more relevant test of the hypothesis.

    1. RRID: AB_996667

      DOI: 10.1038/s44321-024-00068-4

      Resource: (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 45-0621-82, RRID:AB_996667)

      Curator: @AniH

      SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_996667


      What is this?

    2. RRID: AB_469623

      DOI: 10.1038/s44321-024-00068-4

      Resource: (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 25-0441-82, RRID:AB_469623)

      Curator: @AniH

      SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_469623


      What is this?

    3. RRID: AB_469417

      DOI: 10.1038/s44321-024-00068-4

      Resource: (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 17-0801-82, RRID:AB_469417)

      Curator: @AniH

      SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_469417


      What is this?

    4. RRID: AB_469392

      DOI: 10.1038/s44321-024-00068-4

      Resource: (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 17-0451-82, RRID:AB_469392)

      Curator: @AniH

      SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_469392


      What is this?

    5. RRID: AB_469392

      DOI: 10.1038/s44321-024-00068-4

      Resource: (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 17-0451-82, RRID:AB_469392)

      Curator: @AniH

      SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_469392


      What is this?

    6. RRID: AB_469392

      DOI: 10.1038/s44321-024-00068-4

      Resource: (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 17-0451-82, RRID:AB_469392)

      Curator: @AniH

      SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_469392


      What is this?

    7. RRID: AB_465632

      DOI: 10.1038/s44321-024-00068-4

      Resource: (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 12-0311-82, RRID:AB_465632)

      Curator: @AniH

      SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_465632


      What is this?

    8. RRID: AB_465552

      DOI: 10.1038/s44321-024-00068-4

      Resource: (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 12-0114-82, RRID:AB_465552)

      Curator: @AniH

      SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_465552


      What is this?

    9. RRID: AB_464915

      DOI: 10.1038/s44321-024-00068-4

      Resource: (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 11-0081-82, RRID:AB_464915)

      Curator: @AniH

      SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_464915


      What is this?

    10. RRID: AB_464915

      DOI: 10.1038/s44321-024-00068-4

      Resource: (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 11-0081-82, RRID:AB_464915)

      Curator: @AniH

      SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_464915


      What is this?

    11. RRID: AB_442810

      DOI: 10.1038/s44321-024-00068-4

      Resource: (Abcam Cat# ab10558, RRID:AB_442810)

      Curator: @AniH

      SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_442810


      What is this?

    12. RRID: AB_2890649

      DOI: 10.1038/s44321-024-00068-4

      Resource: (Abcam Cat# ab217344, RRID:AB_2890649)

      Curator: @AniH

      SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_2890649


      What is this?

    13. AB_2814585

      DOI: 10.1038/s44321-024-00068-4

      Resource: (BioLegend Cat# 861001, RRID:AB_2814585)

      Curator: @AniH

      SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_2814585


      What is this?

    14. AB_2800282

      DOI: 10.1038/s44321-024-00068-4

      Resource: (Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 97585, RRID:AB_2800282)

      Curator: @AniH

      SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_2800282


      What is this?

    15. AB_2799313

      DOI: 10.1038/s44321-024-00068-4

      Resource: (Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 46890, RRID:AB_2799313)

      Curator: @AniH

      SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_2799313


      What is this?

    16. RRID: AB_2799313

      DOI: 10.1038/s44321-024-00068-4

      Resource: (Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 46890, RRID:AB_2799313)

      Curator: @AniH

      SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_2799313


      What is this?

    17. RRID: AB_2573372

      DOI: 10.1038/s44321-024-00068-4

      Resource: AB2573372

      Curator: @AniH

      SciCrunch record: RRID:AB2573372


      What is this?

    18. RRID: AB_2572431

      DOI: 10.1038/s44321-024-00068-4

      Resource: AB_25724331

      Curator: @AniH

      SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_25724331


      What is this?

    19. RRID: AB_10855240

      DOI: 10.1038/s44321-024-00068-4

      Resource: (Bioss Cat# bs-1444R, RRID:AB_10855240)

      Curator: @AniH

      SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_10855240


      What is this?

    1. Reviewer #4 (Public Review):

      Summary:

      The authors report a novel isomorphism in which the folds of the elephant trunk are recognizably mapped onto the principal sensory trigeminal nucleus in the brainstem. Further, they identify the enlarged nucleus as being situated in this species in an unusual ventral midline position.

      Strengths:

      The identity of the purported trigeminal nucleus and the isomorphic mapping with the trunk folds is supported by multiple lines of evidence: enhanced staining for cytochrome oxidase, an enzyme associated with high metabolic activity; dense vascularization, consistent with high metabolic activity; prominent myelinated bundles that partition the nucleus in a 1:1 mapping of the cutaneous folds in the trunk periphery; near absence of labeling for the anti-peripherin antibody, specific for climbing fibers, which can be seen as expected in the inferior olive; and a high density of glia.

      Weaknesses:

      Despite the supporting evidence listed above, the identification of the gross anatomical bumps, conspicuous in the ventral midline, is problematic. This would be the standard location of the inferior olive, with the principal trigeminal nucleus occupying a more dorsal position. This presents an apparent contradiction which at a minimum needs further discussion. Major species-specific specializations and positional shifts are well-documented for cortical areas, but nuclear layouts in the brainstem have been considered as less malleable.

  11. Jul 2024
    1. Reviewer #4 (Public Review):

      In this manuscript by Sha et al. the authors test the role of TNFa in modulating tumor regression/recurrence under therapeutic pressure from castration (or enzalutamide) in both in vitro and in vivo models of prostate cancer. Using the PTEN-null genetic mouse model, they compare the effect of a TNFα ligand trap, etanercept, at various points pre- and post-castration. Their most interesting findings from this experiment were that etanercept given 3 days prior to castration prevented tumor regression, which is a common phenotype seen in these models after castration, but etanercept given 1 day prior to castration prevented prostate cancer recurrence after castration. They go on to perform RNA sequencing on tumors isolated from either sham or castrate mice from two time points post-castration to study acute and delayed transcriptional responses to androgen deprivation. They found enrichment of gene sets containing TNF-targets which initially decrease post-castration but are elevated by 35 days, the time at which tumors recur. The authors conduct a similar set of experiments using human prostate cancer cell lines treated with the androgen receptor inhibitor enzalutamide and observe that drug treatment leads to cells with basal stem-like features that express high levels of TNF. They noticed that CCL2 levels correlate with changes in TNF levels raising the possibility that CCL2 might be a critical downstream effector for disease recurrence. To this end, they treated PTEN-null and hi-MYC castrated mice with a CCR2-antagonist (CCR2a) because CCR2 is one receptor of CCL2 and monitors tumor growth dynamics. Interestingly, upon treatment with CCR2a, tumors did not recur according to their measurements. They go on to demonstrate that the tumors pre-treated with CCR2a had reduced levels of putative TAMs and increased CTLs in the context of TNF or CCR2 inhibition providing a cellular context associated with disease regression. Lastly, they perform single-cell RNA sequencing to further characterize the tumor microenvironment post-castration and report that the ratio of CTLs to TAMs is lower in a recurrent tumor.

      While the concepts behind the study have merit, the data are incomplete and do not fully support the authors' conclusions. The author's definition of recurrence is subjective given that the amount of disease regression after castration is both variable (Figure 8) and relatively limited, particularly in the PTEN loss model. Critical controls are missing. For example, both drug experiments were completed without treating non-castrate plus drug controls which raises the question of how specific these findings are to castration resistance. No validation was performed to ensure that either the TNF ligand trap or the CCR2 agonist was acting on target. The single-cell sequencing experiments were done without replicates which raises concern about its interpretation. At a conceptual level, the authors say that a major cause of disease recurrence in the immunosuppressive TME, but provide little functional data that macrophages and T cells are directly responsible for this phenotype. Statistical analyses were performed on only select experiments. In summary, further work is recommended to support the conclusions of this story.

  12. Jun 2024
    1. Reviewer #4 (Public Review):

      Summary:

      This manuscript claims to provide a new null hypothesis for testing the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning. It reports that the strength of biodiversity effects changes when this different null hypothesis is used. This main result is rather inevitable. That is, one expects a different answer when using a different approach. The question then becomes whether the manuscript's null hypothesis is both new and an improvement on the null hypothesis that has been in use in recent decades.

      Strengths:

      In general, I appreciate studies like this that question whether we have been doing it all wrong and I encourage consideration of new approaches.

      Weaknesses:

      Despite many sweeping critiques of previous studies and bold claims of novelty made throughout the manuscript, I was unable to find new insights. The manuscript fails to place the study in the context of the long history of literature on competition and biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. The Introduction claims the new approach will address deficiencies of previous approaches, but after reading further I see no evidence that it addresses the limitations of previous approaches noted in the Introduction. Furthermore, the manuscript does not reproducibly describe the methods used to produce the results (e.g., in Table 1) and relies on simulations, claiming experimental data are not available when many experiments have already tested these ideas and not found support for them. Finally, it is unclear to me whether rejecting the 'new' null hypothesis presented in the manuscript would be of interest to ecologists, agronomists, conservationists, or others. I will elaborate on each of these points below.

      The critiques of biodiversity experiments and existing additive partitioning methods are overstated, as is the extent to which this new approach addresses its limitations. For example, the critique that current biodiversity experiments cannot reveal the effects of species interactions (e.g., lines 37-39) isn't generally true, but it could be true if stated more specifically. That is, this statement is incorrect as written because comparisons of mixtures, where there are interspecific and intraspecific interactions, with monocultures, where there are only intraspecific interactions, certainly provide information about the effects of species interactions (interspecific interactions). These biodiversity experiments and existing additive partitioning approaches have limits, of course, for identifying the specific types of interactions (e.g., whether mediated by exploitative resource competition, apparent competition, or other types of interactions). However, the approach proposed in this manuscript gets no closer to identifying these specific mechanisms of species interactions. It has no ability to distinguish between resource and apparent competition, for example. Thus, the motivation and framing of the manuscript do not match what it provides. I believe the entire Introduction would need to be rewritten to clarify what gap in knowledge this proposed approach is addressing and what would be gained by filling this knowledge gap.

      I recommend that the Introduction instead clarify how this study builds on and goes beyond many decades of literature considering how competition and biodiversity effects depend on density. This large literature is insufficiently addressed in this manuscript. This fails to give credit to previous studies considering these ideas and makes it unclear how this manuscript goes beyond the many previous related studies. For example, see papers and books written by de Wit, Harper, Vandermeer, Connolly, Schmid, and many others. Also, note that many biodiversity experiments have crossed diversity treatments with a density treatment and found no significant effects of density or interactions between density and diversity (e.g., Finn et al. 2013 Journal of Applied Ecology). Thus, claiming that these considerations of density are novel, without giving credit to the enormous number of previous studies considering this, is insufficient.

      Replacement series designs emerged as a consensus for biodiversity experiments because they directly test a relevant null hypothesis. This is not to say that there are no other interesting null hypotheses or study designs, but one must acknowledge that many designs and analyses of biodiversity experiments have already been considered. For example, Schmid et al. reviewed these designs and analyses two decades ago (2002, chapter 6 in Loreau et al. 2002 OUP book) and the overwhelming consensus in recent decades has been to use a replacement series and test the corresponding null hypothesis.

      It is unclear to me whether rejecting the 'new' null hypothesis presented in the manuscript would be of interest to ecologists, agronomists, conservationists, or others. Most biodiversity experiments and additive partitions have tested and quantified diversity effects against the null hypothesis that there is no difference between intraspecific and interspecific interactions. If there was no less competition and no more facilitation in mixtures than in monocultures, then there would be no positive diversity effects. Rejecting this null hypothesis is relevant when considering coexistence in ecology, overyielding in agronomy, and the consequences of biodiversity loss in conservation (e.g., Vandermeer 1981 Bioscience, Loreau 2010 Princeton Monograph). This manuscript proposes a different null hypothesis and it is not yet clear to me how it would be relevant to any of these ongoing discussions of changes in biodiversity.

      The claim that all previous methods 'are not capable of quantifying changes in ecosystem productivity by species interactions and species or community level' is incorrect. As noted above, all approaches that compare mixtures, where there are interspecific interactions, to monocultures, where there are no species interactions, do this to some extent. By overstating the limitations of previous approaches, the manuscript fails to clearly identify what unique contribution it is offering, and how this builds on and goes beyond previous work.

      The manuscript relies on simulations because it claims that current experiments are unable to test this, given that they have replacement series designs (lines 128-131). There are, however, dozens of experiments where the replacement series was repeated at multiple densities, which would allow a direct test of these ideas. In fact, these ideas have already been tested in these experiments and density effects were found to be nonsignificant (e.g., Finn et al. 2013).

      It seems that the authors are primarily interested in trees planted at a fixed density, with no opportunity for changes in density, and thus only changes in the size of individuals (e.g., Fig. 1). In natural and experimental systems, realized density differs from the initial planted density, and survivorship of seedlings can depend on both intraspecific and interspecific interactions. Thus, the constrained conditions under which these ideas are explored in this manuscript seem narrow and far from the more complex reality where density is not fixed.

      Additional detailed comments:

      It is unclear to me which 'effects' are referred to on line 36. For example, are these diversity effects or just effects of competition? What is the response variable?

      The usefulness of the approach is overstated on line 52. All partitioning approaches, including the new one proposed here, give the net result of many types of species interactions and thus cannot 'disentangle underlying mechanisms of species interactions.'

      The weaknesses of previous approaches are overstated throughout the manuscript, including in lines 60-61. All approaches provide some, but not all insights. Sweeping statements that previous approaches are not effective, without clarifying what they can and can't do, is unhelpful and incorrect. Also, these statements imply that the approach proposed here addresses the limitations of these previous approaches. I don't yet see how it does so.

      The definitions given for the CE and SE on line 71 are incorrect. Competition affects both terms and CE can be negative or have nothing to do with positive interactions, as noted in many of the papers cited.

      The proposed approach does not address the limitations noted on lines 73 and 74.

      The definition of positive interactions in lines 77 and 78 seems inconsistent with much of the literature, which instead focuses on facilitation or mutualism, rather than competition when describing positive interactions.

      Throughout the manuscript, competition is often used interchangeably with resource competition (e.g., line 82) and complementarity is often attributed to resource partitioning (e.g., line 77). This ignores apparent competition and partitioning enemy-free niche space, which has been found to contribute to biodiversity effects in many studies.

      In what sense are competitive interactions positive for competitive species (lines 82-83)? By definition, competition is an interaction that has a negative effect. Do you mean that interspecific competition is less than intraspecific competition? I am having a very difficult time following the logic.

      Results are asserted on lines 93-95, but I cannot find the methods that produced these results. I am unable to evaluate the work without a repeatable description of the methods.

      The description of the null hypothesis in the common additive partitioning approach on lines 145-146 is incorrect. In the null case, it does not assume that there are no interspecific interactions, but rather that interspecific and intraspecific interactions are equivalent.

    1. Reviewer #4 (Public Review):

      Summary:

      The authors report a novel isomorphism in which the folds of the elephant trunk are recognizably mapped onto the principal sensory trigeminal nucleus in the brainstem. Further, they identifiy the enlarged nucleus as being situated in this species in an unusual ventral midline position.

      Strengths:

      The identity of the purported trigeminal nucleus and the isomorphic mapping with the trunk folds is supported by multiple lines of evidence: enhanced staining for cytochrome oxidase, an enzyme associated with high metabolic activity; dense vascularization, consistent with high metabolic activity; prominent myelinated bundles that partition the nucleus in a 1:1 mapping of the cutaneous folds in the trunk periphery; near absence of labeling for the anti-peripherin antibody, specific for climbing fibers, which can be seen as expected in the inferior olive; and a high density of glia.

      Weaknesses:

      Despite the supporting evidence listed above, the identification of the gross anatomical bumps, conspicuous in the ventral midline, is problematic. This would be the standard location of the inferior olive, with the principal trigeminal nucleus occupying a more dorsal position. This presents an apparent contradiction which at a minimum needs further discussion. Major species-specific specializations and positional shifts are well-documented for cortical areas, but nuclear layouts in the brainstem have been considered as less malleable.

    1. for - AI - inside industry predictions to 2034 - Leopold Aschenbrenner - inside information on disruptive Generative AI to 2034

      document description - Situational Awareness - The Decade Ahead - author - Leopold Aschenbrenner

      summary - Leopold Aschenbrenner is an ex-employee of OpenAI and reveals the insider information of the disruptive plans for AI in the next decade, that pose an existential threat to create a truly dystopian world if we continue going down our BAU trajectory. - The A.I. arms race can end in disaster. The mason threat of A.I. is that humans are fallible and even one bad actor with access to support intelligent A.I. can post an existential threat to everyone - A.I. threat is amplifier by allowing itt to control important processes - and when it is exploited by the military industrial complex, the threat escalates significantly

    1. Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center

      DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05485-4

      Resource: Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (RRID:SCR_006457)

      Curator: @DavidDeutsch

      SciCrunch record: RRID:SCR_006457


      What is this?

    1. Reviewer #4 (Public Review):

      This is a very interesting study, where the authors discovered two neuroendocrine signaling circuits with opposite effects on organismal longevity elicited by motor neurons at different ages.

      Interestingly, both systems employ the same neurotransmitter (that is, acetylcholine) and signal the intestine. However, one has effects on early life to shorten lifespan whereas the other system is activated in mid-life to extend lifespan. At the mechanistic level, this bidirectional regulation is possible through the recruitment of two different ACh receptors in the gut: ACR-6 and GAR-3. The authors found that ACR-6 expression in the intestine is restricted to early life, whereas GAR-3 expression in the gut is confined to mid-late life. Interestingly, ACR-6 modulates the transcription factor DAF-16, but GAR-3 regulates HSF-1.

      The study combines different approaches, including inducible systems (AID) which are critical for the conclusions of the paper. The conclusions are well supported by the experiments and results. The data provide a potential mechanism for the temporal control of lifespan and shed light on the complex role of the nervous system in organismal aging. These results can have important implications for understanding how organismal aging is regulated in a temporal manner by cell non-autonomous mechanisms. I didn't observe significant weaknesses in the study, but I have several comments that I hope the authors will address.

    1. Reviewer #4 (Public Review):

      Summary:

      The authors report the role of the Pyruvate Kinase M2 (PKM2) enzyme nuclear translocation as fundamental in the activation of astrocytes in a model of autoimmune encephalitis (EAE). They show that astrocytes, activated through culturing in EAE splenocytes medium, increase their nuclear PKM2 with consequent activation of NFkB and STAT3 pathways. Prevention of PKM2 nuclear translocation decreases astrocyte counteracts this activation. The authors found that the E3 ubiquitin ligase TRIM21 interacts with PKM2 and promotes its nuclear translocation. In vivo, either silencing of TRIM21 or inhibition of PKM2 nuclear translocation ameliorates the severity of the disease in the EAE model.

      Strengths:

      This work contributes to the knowledge of the complex action of the PKM2 enzyme in the context of an autoimmune-neurological disease, highlighting its nuclear role and a novel partner, TRIM21, and thus adding a novel rationale for therapeutic targeting.

      Weaknesses:

      Despite the relevance of the work and its goals, some of the conclusions drawn would require more thorough proof:

      I believe that the major weakness is the fact that TRIM21 is known to have per se many roles in autoimmune and immune pathways and some of the effects observed might be due to a PKM2-independent action. Some of the experiments to link the two proteins, besides their interaction, do not completely clarify the issue. On top of that, the in vivo experiments address the role of TRIM21 and the nuclear localisation of PKM2 independently, thus leaving the matter unsolved.

      Some experimental settings are not described to a level that is necessary to fully understand the data, especially for a non-expert audience: e.g. the EAE model and MOG treatment; action and reference of the different nuclear import inhibitors; use of splenocyte culture medium and the possible effect of non-EAE splenocytes.

      The statement that PKM2 is a substrate of TRIM21 ubiquitin ligase activity is an overinterpretation. There is no evidence that this interaction results in ubiquitin modification of PKM2; the ubiquitination experiment is minimal and is not performed in conditions that would allow us to see ubiquitination of PKM2 (e.g. denaturing conditions, reciprocal pull-down, catalytically inactive TRIM21, etc.).

    1. (#3605)

      DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35527-4

      Resource: BDSC_3506

      Curator: @DavidDeutsch

      SciCrunch record: RRID:BDSC_3506


      What is this?

    2. (#4776)

      DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35527-4

      Resource: (BDSC Cat# 4776,RRID:BDSC_4776)

      Curator: @DavidDeutsch

      SciCrunch record: RRID:BDSC_4776


      What is this?

    3. (#44633)

      DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35527-4

      Resource: RRID:BDSC_44633

      Curator: @DavidDeutsch

      SciCrunch record: RRID:BDSC_44633


      What is this?

    4. (#52215)

      DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35527-4

      Resource: RRID:BDSC_52215

      Curator: @DavidDeutsch

      SciCrunch record: RRID:BDSC_52215


      What is this?

    5. (#32489)

      DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35527-4

      Resource: RRID:BDSC_32489

      Curator: @DavidDeutsch

      SciCrunch record: RRID:BDSC_32489


      What is this?

    6. (BDSC, #7017)

      DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35527-4

      Resource: (BDSC Cat# 7017,RRID:BDSC_7017)

      Curator: @DavidDeutsch

      SciCrunch record: RRID:BDSC_7017


      What is this?

    7. (BDSC, #67493)

      DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35527-4

      Resource: RRID:BDSC_67493

      Curator: @DavidDeutsch

      SciCrunch record: RRID:BDSC_67493


      What is this?

    8. BDSC, #57669

      DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35527-4

      Resource: (BDSC Cat# 57669,RRID:BDSC_57669)

      Curator: @DavidDeutsch

      SciCrunch record: RRID:BDSC_57669


      What is this?

    9. BDSC, #91368

      DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35527-4

      Resource: RRID:BDSC_91368

      Curator: @DavidDeutsch

      SciCrunch record: RRID:BDSC_91368


      What is this?

    10. Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center

      DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35527-4

      Resource: Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (RRID:SCR_006457)

      Curator: @DavidDeutsch

      SciCrunch record: RRID:SCR_006457


      What is this?

    1. nPOD; www.jdrfnpod.org

      DOI: 10.1038/s41577-023-00985-4

      Resource: Network for Pancreatic Organ Donors with Diabetes (RRID:SCR_014641)

      Curator: @bandrow

      SciCrunch record: RRID:SCR_014641


      What is this?

    1. RRID:ZFIN_ZDB-GENO-130815-4

      DOI: 10.7554/eLife.89516

      Resource: (ZFIN Cat# ZDB-GENO-130815-4,RRID:ZFIN_ZDB-GENO-130815-4)

      Curator: @scibot

      SciCrunch record: RRID:ZFIN_ZDB-GENO-130815-4


      What is this?

  13. May 2024
    1. four 00:08:25 major common misunderstandings that have infected our understanding of what it is to be a living system

      for - molecular biology - paradigm shift - living system - 4 common misunderstandings - book - Understanding Living Systems - 4 common misunderstandings

      4 common misunderstandings of living systems - 1. The central dogma of molecular biology - one way causation - Genes (DNA) to - proteins to - organism - 2. The Weismann Barrier - 3. DNA as self-replicator - 4. Separation of Replicator (DNA) and Vehicle (Living cell) are completely separate

    1. Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center

      DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43362-4

      Resource: Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (RRID:SCR_006457)

      Curator: @maulamb

      SciCrunch record: RRID:SCR_006457


      What is this?

    2. BDSC: #79743

      DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43362-4

      Resource: BDSC_79743

      Curator: @maulamb

      SciCrunch record: RRID:BDSC_79743


      What is this?

    3. #58343

      DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43362-4

      Resource: BDSC_58343

      Curator: @maulamb

      SciCrunch record: RRID:BDSC_58343


      What is this?

    4. #8443

      DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43362-4

      Resource: (BDSC Cat# 8443,RRID:BDSC_8443)

      Curator: @maulamb

      SciCrunch record: RRID:BDSC_8443


      What is this?

    5. #65406

      DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43362-4

      Resource: (BDSC Cat# 65406,RRID:BDSC_65406)

      Curator: @maulamb

      SciCrunch record: RRID:BDSC_65406


      What is this?

    6. #39760

      DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43362-4

      Resource: BDSC_39760

      Curator: @maulamb

      SciCrunch record: RRID:BDSC_39760


      What is this?

    7. #4775

      DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43362-4

      Resource: (BDSC Cat# 4775,RRID:BDSC_4775)

      Curator: @maulamb

      SciCrunch record: RRID:BDSC_4775


      What is this?

    8. #55851

      DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43362-4

      Resource: (BDSC Cat# 55851,RRID:BDSC_55851)

      Curator: @maulamb

      SciCrunch record: RRID:BDSC_55851


      What is this?

    9. #3605

      DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43362-4

      Resource: (BDSC Cat# 3605,RRID:BDSC_3605)

      Curator: @maulamb

      SciCrunch record: RRID:BDSC_3605


      What is this?

    1. Reviewer #4 (Public Review):<br /> <br /> This study provides direct evidence showing that Sema7a plays a role in the axon growth during the formation of peripheral sensory circuits in the lateral-line system of zebrafish. This is a valuable finding because the molecules for axon growth in hair-cell sensory systems are not well understood. The majority of the experimental evidence is convincing, and the analysis is rigorous. The evidence supporting Sema7a's juxtracrine vs. secreted role and involvement in synapse formation in hair cells is less conclusive. The study will be of interest to cell, molecular and developmental biologists, and sensory neuroscientists.

    1. Der französische Konzern TotalEnergies fördert in den USA mit 17 00 Förderanlagen via Fracking Erdgas, das dann verflüssigt wird. Allein in der Region von Arlington in Texas sind dadurch 420.000 Menschen toxischen Emissionen ausgesetzt. Die Libération publiziert die Ergebnisse einer gemeinsamen mit Disclose durchgeführten Recherche. Das produzierte LNG wird auch nach Frankreich und Europa verschifft.

      https://www.liberation.fr/environnement/pollution/ma-petite-fille-etouffe-a-force-de-tousser-le-scandale-du-gaz-de-schiste-americain-que-total-importe-en-france-20230926_TVBMN7L37BCD5FMQPXTC6WDRFM/

      Disclose-Veröffentlichung: https://disclose.ngo/fr/article/gaz-de-schiste-totalenergies-au-coeur-dun-scandale-sanitaire-et-environnemental-au-texas

  14. Apr 2024
    1. Walk It Out

      for - sleep hygiene - 4 - walk it out

      advice - sleep hygiene - 4 - walk it out - try not to spend too much time in bed awake, - as your brain learns to associate the bed with waking - if you wake up in the night, walk it out for about half an hour

    1. Reviewer #4 (Public Review):

      This study provides direct evidence showing that Sema7a plays a role in the axon growth during the formation of peripheral sensory circuits in the lateral-line system of zebrafish. This is a valuable finding because the molecules for axon growth in hair-cell sensory systems are not well understood. The majority of the experimental evidence is convincing, and the analysis is rigorous. The evidence supporting Sema7a's juxtracrine vs. secreted role and involvement in synapse formation in hair cells is less conclusive. The study will be of interest to cell, molecular and developmental biologists, and sensory neuroscientists.

    1. « J’ai trouvé l’amour de ma vie. On a discuté deux, trois jours avant et, depuis notre rencontre, on ne s’est plus quittés et ça n’arrivera jamais » ; « Bientôt deux ans que nous nous sommes rencontrés via Meetic… Le coup de foudre immédiat dès notre première rencontre. Nous ne nous quittons plus, nous nous aimons plus que tout… »

      Les témoignages vont souvent dans le sens de ceux pour lesquels cela à fonctionner, entretenant et diffusant l’illusion du mythe de l’amour, faisant l'impasse sur la part de concession, de discussions, de négociations, de réajustements, qui a été inhérente au fonctionnement d’une relation intime et qui est cachée ou tue car cela ne correspond pas à l'image romantique que l'on se fait de la rencontre "idéale".

  15. Mar 2024
    1. Internet a radicalement changé notre façon d’envisager la rencontre et le discours amoureux, que nous soyons inscrits ou pas sur les réseaux.

      D'emblée l'article pose comme un constat à valeur d'universalité que nous sommes tous impactés. Il expose l'idée que cela va au-delà de notre usage effectif ou non des réseaux sociaux dans la quête de l'amour. Cette affirmation semble pouvoir être remise en question notamment au regard du fait que nous n'avons pas tous la même utilisation d'internet comme les personnes âgées par exemple qui sont loin d'en comprendre tous les codes et usages.

    2. Si nous rapportons toutes ces histoires d’amour aux chiffres des unions effectives nouées en ligne, nous ne sommes que dans l’écume

      Propos intéressants à citer en ouverture de l'article mais qui auraient eu besoin d'être agrémentés de quelques données statistiques.

    3. Des nuits entières, par écrans interposés, nous avons échafaudé notre histoire : acheter une maison, avoir un enfant, marier nos amis…

      Il est plus aisé de fantasmer ça sur un écran que de le mettre en place pour de vrai et de s’en donner les moyens dans la vie réelle où les contraintes sont plus palpables et vont demander de nombreux efforts.

    4. Nos échanges numérico-épistolaires

      Mise en évidence du fonctionnement épistolaire de ces conversations, principe fondamental. Le temps pour l’autre est pris quand on a le temps soit même de se connecter sur la plateforme, de répondre à un sms. Il n'y a pas de contrainte d’écouter l’autre ou de répondre à ses sollicitations quand nous ne nous sentons pas disponible, donc pas de déconvenue, contournement des efforts de concession, de disponibilités, etc qui incombent à la relation.

    5. je n’avais pas “la méthode”.

      A supposer qu’il y ait une méthode pour trouver l’amour. Une recette toute faite qu’il faudrait appliquer comme un process. On revient à l'idée que l'on est sur une certaine rentabilité, une forme de taylorisme de l'amour.

    6. les cases que j’avais cochées me montraient le profil type de mon prince charmant

      L’humain est un être complexe, nous ne pouvons pas nous réduire à des cases « j’aime faire la cuisine, j’aime faire du jogging, etc… ». Nous avons besoin d'entretenir des subtilités en lien avec ce que nous aimons car cela contribue à dire au monde qui nous sommes. Ce sont les subtilités qui font que je vais trouver cela touchant ou ridicule mais risible, etc… Il est des choses qui à l’écrit n’émettent pas du tout la même vibration qu’à l’oral. Une phrase écrite peut renvoyer à plusieurs réalité et il n'y aura que la façon d'exprimer cette phrase à l'oral qui en montrera les nuances et qui font que je suis unique. Si je dis « j’aime courir sous la pluie car je sens l’odeur des herbes, des arbres, du bitume mouillé » mais que la personne ne me voit pas entrain d’exprimer cette idée à partir de ma personnalité propre, elle peut trouver cela très touchant ou complètement mièvre, ou ne pas savoir à quoi je fais référence exactement. Les mots sont vides de sens sans le para-verbal et le non verbal.

    7. Le corps est comme endormi.

      Le corps est passif, il n’est pas en mouvement, il n’est pas investi dans cette rencontre avec l’autre. Ce qui est actif et activé c’est notre cerveau et les fantasmes qui s'y jouent. L’équilibre est à trouver dans une satisfaction corporelle et intellectuelle. Simultanément.

    8. « Ces sites hystérisent nos relations

      Apport de psychologie pure. En lien direct avec le thème de la revue.

    9. « Pour une femme, poursuit le sexothérapeute, c’est un lieu où le désir est excité autant par le besoin de plaire que par la colère. »

      Revanche pseudo-féministe illusoire car en réalité il n’y a pas de rapport de force à établir entre les hommes et les femmes il s’agirait davantage que chacun respecte l’autre pour ce qu’il est avec ses qualités et ses défauts pour pleinement apprécier la rencontre. Le besoin de plaire rejoint la validation sociale qui est un booster d’estime de soi.

    10. 1 % à 2 % seulement des unions amoureuses sont consécutives à une rencontre en ligne (Enquête Ined, janvier 2013).

      Quelques pourcentages sont cités afin de donner une représentation globale. Il n'est pas précisé ce qui est entendu par "unions amoureuses". Une relation amoureuse durable ou brève ? conforme aux attentes de l’utilisateur ou non ? Il manque des critères objectivables.

    11. Adopteunmec.com

      Site dont le logo est un homme dans un caddie. Peut-on s’attendre à autre chose qu’à un rapport de consommation de la relation amoureuse ?

    12. Difficile d’avouer une calvitie naissante, un âge avancé ou des revenus trop faibles. Du coup, ils mentent, alimentant les ressentiments féminins.

      Là encore des deux côtés on n’assume pas la part de l’échec, la déconvenue, qui peut-être possible mais plus encore, on n’assume pas la réalité de ce qu’est un être humain. Soulève un problème plus profond : en mettant à distance derrière un écran on oublie peut-être qu’un humain réel c’est aussi quelqu’un qui a des problèmes de santé, des problèmes personnels, qui subit une dégradation lente et partielle de son corps… Pose finalement la question du virtuel : est-ce que ce ne serait pas la distance qui nous ferait oublier la réalité des rapports humains ? De la même façon que l’on observe des commentaires haineux ou inappropriée sous le contenu de personnes exposées sur internet tels que les influenceurs pour ne citer qu’eux.

    13. pour la première fois de leur histoire, les femmes ont à leurs pieds une immense cour de prétendants qui doivent tout faire pour les séduire.

      Mise en évidence d’une mutation sociale : nouvelle révolution pour les femmes, à la manière de mai 68 les règles, l’ordre établi jusqu’à lors est remis en question.

    14. « la montée actuelle de l’impatience, cette impossibilité de supporter la frustration ou la déconvenue, commente Alain Héril. C’est inquiétant, car cela devient parfois une source de souffrrance ».

      Lien causale proposé ici : les applications de rencontres contribuent à l’augmentation de la rapidité dans le fonctionnement de la société. Nous pouvons « swiper » d’un geste simple, presque intuitif. Il n’y a quasiment plus de place pour l'attente, la déconvenue, pour « la part d’échec » qui fait pourtant parti du processus d’acclimatation à l’autre.

    15. Les sites de rencontres nous font miroiter qu’un remplaçant nous attend au coin d’une case à cocher sur Internet.

      Les utilisateurs sont exigeants, voir intransigeants car ils ont les moyens de l’être étant donné que la personne peut être remplacée par une simple nouvelle recherche si elle ne correspond pas aux attentes.

    16. « En mai 1968, hommes et femmes ont dénoncé le couple comme objet d’oppression sociale. En réaction, ils voulaient bâtir, à égalité, des histoires où chacun aurait la place d’évoluer auprès de l’autre, où le risque d’échec était assumé. Les sites de rencontres ont changé cela. Par le biais d’Internet, nous sommes revenus à une image fixe de l’amour. Dans mon cabinet, je constate que mes patients sont de plus en plus victimes du mythe de l’amour. Les femmes, en particulier, recherchent un homme idéal, leur double masculin. »

      Constatation d’une régression par rapport à une avancée des mœurs. Mise en perspective avec l'évolution sociale. Alain Héril nous rappelle que le lieu de révolution des mœurs qu’a été mai 68 a permis de faire rentrer une composante essentielle dans la relation à l’autre : la part d’échec possible lorsque deux individus se côtoient pour essayer d’entretenir une relation amoureuse. A l’extrême opposé, sur les sites de rencontre, la possibilité de l’échec n’existe pas, et est même gommée puisqu’ils proposent du « sur-mesure » et entretiennent « le mythe de l’amour ».

    1. Reviewer #4 (Public Review):

      Summary:

      In their revised manuscript "Conformational dynamics of a nicotinic receptor neurotransmitter binding site," Singh and colleagues present molecular docking and dynamics simulations to explore the initial conformational changes associated with agonist binding in the muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, in context with the extensive experimental literature on this system. Their central findings are of a consistently preferred pose for agonists upon initial association with a resting channel, followed by a dramatic rotation of the ligand and contraction of a critical loop over the binding site. Principal component analysis also suggests the formation of an intermediate complex, not yet captured in structural studies. Binding free energy estimates are consistent with the evolution of a higher-affinity complex following agonist binding, with a ligand efficiency notably similar to experimental values. Snapshot comparisons provide a structural rationale for these changes on the basis of pocket volume, hydration, and rearrangement of key residues at the subunit interface.

      Strengths:

      Docking results are clearly presented and remarkably consistent. Simulations are produced in triplicate with each of four different agonists, providing an informative basis for internal validation. They identify an intriguing transition in ligand pose, not well documented in experimental structures, and potentially applicable to mechanistic or even pharmacological modeling of this and related receptor systems. The paper seems a notable example of integrating quantitative structure-function analysis with systematic computational modeling and simulations, likely applicable to the wider journal audience.

      Weaknesses:

      The response to initial review is somewhat disappointing, declining in some places to implement suggested clarifications, and propagating apparent errors in at least one table (Fig 2-source data 1). Some legends (e.g. Fig 2-supplement 4, Fig 3, Fig 4) and figure shadings (e.g. Fig 2-supplement 2, Fig 6-supplement 2) remain unclear. Apparent convergence of agonist-docked simulations towards a desensitized state (l 184) is difficult to interpret in absence of comparative values with other states, systems, etc. In more general concerns, aside from the limited timescales (200 ns) that do not capture global rearrangements, it is not obvious that landscapes constructed on two principal components to identify endpoint and intermediate states (Fig 3) are highly robust or reproducible, nor whether they relate consistently to experimental structures.

    1. I'm reading through other's posts in this subforum and it's helping me sort things out. I'm beginning to see how wanting others to behave differently is selfish.

      step 4 - self-centered vs selfish