Résumé de la vidéo [00:00:09][^1^][1] - [00:22:28][^2^][2]:

Cette conférence internationale aborde la santé mentale et le bien-être des élèves, en mettant l'accent sur les inégalités sociales et les compétences psychosociales.

Temps forts: + [00:00:09][^3^][3] Introduction des participants * Présentation des intervenants * Objectifs de la table ronde * Réactions aux sessions précédentes + [00:02:31][^4^][4] Mixité sociale et académique * Importance de la mixité * Classes de niveau et redoublement * Propositions pour améliorer l'hétérogénéité + [00:08:00][^5^][5] Compétences psychosociales * Impact sur la réussite scolaire * Importance de l'intervention scolaire * Contexte et comparaison sociale + [00:12:00][^6^][6] Orientation et inégalités * Influence des contextes sociaux * Parcours éducatifs non linéaires * Rôle des enseignants et des parents + [00:19:00][^7^][7] Mobilité sociale et géographique * Obstacles financiers et géographiques * Importance de l'information et du soutien * Réussite dans l'enseignement supérieur

Résumé de la vidéo [00:22:30][^1^][1] - [00:44:06][^2^][2]:

Cette partie de la conférence discute des défis et des stratégies pour améliorer la mixité sociale et scolaire en France, en mettant l'accent sur l'importance de l'égalité dans l'offre éducative et les politiques publiques.

Temps forts: + [00:22:30][^3^][3] Défis de la mixité sociale * Importance de la patience et de la détermination * Concertation entre divers acteurs * Équilibre entre liberté de choix et mixité + [00:24:00][^4^][4] Inégalités dans l'offre éducative * Différences entre contractuels et titulaires * Importance de l'égalité dans les offres de formation * Impact des inégalités sur la mixité sociale + [00:27:00][^5^][5] Rôle de l'enseignement privé * Financement public de l'enseignement privé * Problèmes de séparatisme social * Impact des politiques de scolarité obligatoire + [00:29:00][^6^][6] Internats d'excellence * Effets spectaculaires sur la réussite scolaire * Importance de l'accompagnement et de l'estime de soi * Question de la réplicabilité des résultats + [00:35:00][^7^][7] Rôle des enseignants * Solitude professionnelle des enseignants français * Impact sur les compétences sociales des élèves * Problèmes de gestion des enseignants dans les zones prioritaires + [00:40:00][^8^][8] Questions politiques et sociales * Importance de l'éthique collective de l'éducation * Tensions entre intérêts généraux et particuliers * Impact des inégalités sociales sur l'éducation

Résumé de la vidéo [00:44:10][^1^][1] - [01:01:23][^2^][2]:

Cette partie de la conférence internationale aborde les inégalités sociales et leur impact sur la santé mentale et le bien-être des élèves. Les intervenants discutent des défis et des solutions possibles pour améliorer l'éducation et le soutien aux élèves défavorisés.

Points forts : + [00:44:25][^3^][3] Questions du public * Importance des bilans de santé visuelle * Impact des problèmes de vue sur l'apprentissage * Proposition de bilans ophtalmiques pour les élèves + [00:49:00][^4^][4] Réponses des intervenants * Importance de l'accompagnement des élèves défavorisés * Diagnostic des troubles comme la dyslexie * Accès inégal aux soins en fonction du milieu social + [00:51:00][^5^][5] Santé publique et éducation * Impact de la prématurité et de l'exposition à l'alcool in utero * Importance du dépistage précoce des problèmes sensoriels * Potentiel d'apprentissage universel des enfants + [00:54:01][^6^][6] Réforme de la voie professionnelle * Gratification des périodes de formation en milieu professionnel (PFMP) * Risques et avantages de la rémunération des élèves * Importance de l'orientation positive vers les lycées professionnels + [00:57:00][^7^][7] Modèle pédagogique français * Différences avec d'autres pays européens * Importance de l'égalité et de l'uniformité * Critiques du cours magistral et de la sélection des élèves

http://beesbuzz.biz/blog/10755-Warning-signs-with-social-media-platforms

IPCC AR6 WG III chapter 5: Demand, services and social aspects of mitigation https://hyp.is/go?url=https%3A%2F%2Freport.ipcc.ch%2Far6wg3%2Fpdf%2FIPCC_AR6_WGIII_FinalDraft_Chapter05.pdf&group=world

reply to: https://ariadne.space/2022/07/01/a-silo-can-never-provide-digital-autonomy-to-its-users/

Matt Ridley indicates in The Rational Optimist that markets for goods and services "work so well that it is hard to design them so they fail to deliver efficiency and innovation" while assets markets are nearly doomed to failure and require close and careful regulation.

If we view the social media landscape from this perspective, an IndieWeb world in which people are purchasing services like easy import/export of their data; the ability to move their domain name and URL permalinks from one web host to another; and CMS (content management system) services/platforms/functionalities, represents the successful market mode for our personal data and online identities. Here competition for these sorts of services will not only improve the landscape, but generally increased competition will tend to drive the costs to consumers down. The internet landscape is developed and sophisticated enough and broadly based on shared standards that this mode of service market should easily be able to not only thrive, but innovate.

At the other end of the spectrum, if our data are viewed as assets in an asset market between Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, et al., it is easy to see that the market has already failed so miserably that one cannot even easily move ones' assets from one silo to another. Social media services don't compete to export or import data because the goal is to trap you and your data and attention there, otherwise they lose. The market corporate social media is really operating in is one for eyeballs and attention to sell advertising, so one will notice a very health, thriving, and innovating market for advertisers. Social media users will easily notice that there is absolutely no regulation in the service portion of the space at all. This only allows the system to continue failing to provide improved or even innovative service to people on their "service". The only real competition in the corporate silo social media space is for eyeballs and participation because the people and their attention are the real product.

As a result, new players whose goal is to improve the health of the social media space, like the recent entrant Cohost, are far better off creating a standards based service that allows users to register their own domain names and provide a content management service that has easy import and export of their data. This will play into the services market mode which improves outcomes for people. Aligning in any other competition mode that silos off these functions will force them into competition with the existing corporate social services and we already know where those roads lead.

Those looking for ethical and healthy models of this sort of social media service might look at Manton Reece's micro.blog platform which provides a wide variety of these sorts of data services including data export and taking your domain name with you. If you're unhappy with his service, then it's relatively easy to export your data and move it to another host using WordPress or some other CMS. On the flip side, if you're unhappy with your host and CMS, then it's also easy to move over to micro.blog and continue along just as you had before. Best of all, micro.blog is offering lots of the newest and most innovative web standards including webmention notificatons which enable website-to-website conversations, micropub, and even portions of microsub not to mention some great customer service.

I like to analogize the internet and social media to competition in the telecom/cellular phone space In America, you have a phone number (domain name) and can then have your choice of service provider (hosting), and a choice of telephone (CMS). Somehow instead of adopting a social media common carrier model, we have trapped ourselves inside of a model that doesn't provide the users any sort of real service or options. It's easy to imagine what it would be like to need your own AT&T account to talk to family on AT&T and a separate T-Mobile account to talk to your friends on T-Mobile because that's exactly what you're doing with social media despite the fact that you're all still using the same internet. Part of the draw was that services like Facebook appeared to be "free" and it's only years later that we're seeing the all too real costs emerge.

This sort of competition and service provision also goes down to subsidiary layers of the ecosystem. Take for example the idea of writing interface and text editing. There are (paid) services like iA Writer, Ulysses, and Typora which people use to compose their writing. Many people use these specifically for writing blog posts. Companies can charge for these products because of their beauty, simplicity, and excellent user interfaces. Some of them either do or could support the micropub and IndieAuth web standards which allow their users the ability to log into their websites and directly post their saved content from the editor directly to their website. Sure there are also a dozen or so other free micropub clients that also allow this, but why not have and allow competition for beauty and ease of use? Let's say you like WordPress enough, but aren't a fan of the Gutenberg editor. Should you need to change to Drupal or some unfamiliar static site generator to exchange a better composing experience for a dramatically different and unfamiliar back end experience? No, you could simply change your editor client and continue on without missing a beat. Of course the opposite also applies—WordPress could split out Gutenberg as a standalone (possibly paid) micropub client and users could then easily use it to post to Drupal, micro.blog, or other CMSs that support the micropub spec, and many already do.

Social media should be a service to and for people all the way down to its core. The more companies there are that provide these sorts of services means more competition which will also tend to lure people away from silos where they're trapped for lack of options. Further, if your friends are on services that interoperate and can cross communicate with standards like Webmention from site to site, you no longer need to be on Facebook because "that's where your friends and family all are."

I have no doubt that we can all get to a healthier place online, but it's going to take companies and startups like Cohost to make better choices in how they frame their business models. Co-ops and non-profits can help here too. I can easily see a co-op adding webmention to their Mastodon site to allow users to see and moderate their own interactions instead of forcing local or global timelines on their constituencies. Perhaps Garon didn't think Webmention was a fit for Mastodon, but this doesn't mean that others couldn't support it. I personally think that Darius Kazemi's Hometown fork of Mastodon which allows "local only" posting a fabulous little innovation while still allowing interaction with a wider readership, including me who reads him in a microsub enabled social reader. Perhaps someone forks Mastodon to use as a social feed reader, but builds in micropub so that instead of posting the reply to a Mastodon account, it's posted to one's IndieWeb capable website which sends a webmention notification to the original post? Opening up competition this way makes lots of new avenues for every day social tools.

Continuing the same old siloing of our data and online connections is not the way forward. We'll see who stands by their ethics and morals by serving people's interests and not the advertising industry.

Public Annotation of IPCC Report AR6 Climate Change 2022 Mitigation of Climate Change WGIII Chapter 5: Demand, Services and Social Aspects of Mitigation

NOTE: Permission given by one of the lead authors, Felix Creutzig to annotate with caveat that there may be minor changes in the final version.

This annotation explores the potential of mass mobilization of citizens and the commons to effect dramatic demand side reductions. It leverages the potential agency of the public to play a critical role in rapid decarbonization.

This is one of the biggest underlying problems that centralized platforms often have. It's also a solid reason why EdTech platforms are pernicious as well.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2021, February 4). Small Business Pulse Survey Shows Shift in Expectations from Spring to Winter. The United States Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/01/small-business-pulse-survey-shows-shift-in-expectations-from-spring-to-winter.html?utm_campaign=20210126msacos1ccstors&utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery

Leppanen, J., Tosunlar, L., Blackburn, R., Williams, S., Tchanturia, K., & Sedgewick, F. (2020, July 6). Critical incidents in anorexia nervosa.

Britwum, K., Catrone, R., Smith, G. D., & Koch, D. S. (2020, May 5). A University Based Social Services Parent Training Model: A Telehealth Adaptation During the COVID-19 Pandemic. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gw3cd

Colombo, R., Wallace, M., & Taylor, R. S. (2020, April 11). An Essential Service Decision Model for Applied Behavior Analytic Providers During Crisis. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/te8ha

The Coerciveness of the Primary Key: Infrastructure Problems in Human Services Work

Outcomes-Based Financing Data Advisory Council

Relieving the Burden of Navigating Health and Social Services for Older Adults and Caregivers