I actually think this is Not Constructive, since there's no absolute rule about which pairings can be joined into a single word or hyhenated, and it's pointless having "votes" here about each specific case. Follow a style guide if you have one, or search Google Books and copy whatever the majority do. Or just make your own decision.

The words type, concept, property, quality, feature and attribute (all used in describing things) tend to be used with different verbs. E.g. Suppose a rose bush is defined as a plant that is "thorny", "flowering" and "bushy". You might say a rose bush instantiates these three types, or embodies these three concepts, or exhibits these three properties, or possesses these three qualities, features or attributes.

Originally he had used the terms usage scenarios and usage case – the latter a direct translation of his Swedish term användningsfall – but found that neither of these terms sounded natural in English, and eventually he settled on use case.

Fires an invalid event at the element

Britomart Undershaft

The Oxford English Dictionary says that the global network is usually "the internet", but most of the American historical sources it cites use the capitalized form.

Even the most shy person can become pretty open when the topic suits their personality.

meatloaf

convict

but IMHO this is not very readable and error prone

Warning: Many native English speakers find who versus whom difficult and frequently get it wrong. This is also due to the fact that it is falling out of fashion and is often seen as archaic.

The easy way to tell if you need who or whom is to substitute it for he or him and see which one makes sense.

which are passed onto controller actions.

Anti-Features

In agent-oriented programming the antonym is depender, though in general usage the common term dependent is used instead. There is no common language equivalent for dependee', however – other metaphors are used instead, such as parent/child. The circumlocutions “A depends on B” and “B is depended on by A” are much more common in general use than “A is the depender, B is the ' dependee ”.

Logistically speaking, I suppose "depender" and "dependee" would be more accurate, though neither of those are proper english words as far as I know.

Setup

Set up

Onto

checkout

Here's what 20 seconds of googling turned up: University of Rochester Grammar Style Guide oh hey look, a stackoverflow thread The truth about grammar: bailout versus bail out and there are so many more...

I think the conjugation is particularly helpful to see why it should be two separate words: "log in" -> "logging in" -> "logged in"

Perhaps someone should give an example of when 'into' is ever correct. "Turn into bed" is definitely incorrect, unless one is morphing into the form of a bed. But what about "he fell into the hole", "she went into the house", or "Star Trek Into Darkness"?

Lie: I felt sick, so I lay down.Here’s where it can get a bit tricky. The past tense of lie is lay, but not because there is any overlap between the two verbs. So when you say, “I lay down for a nap,” you’re actually using the verb lie, not lay, despite the way it sounds.

Linus's law

“Blogging” has a poor brand within many high status employers, whereas “memos” and “essays” do not. Try to categorize your writing as these things rather than a blog post.

I have to mark up the pages

mark up

source | edit | rollback | link

set up

The verb set up, on the other hand, is usually found as an open compound (two words, no hyphen) in both American and British English.

Either, plus presumably "bug-fix." The word has almost surely been coined multiple times by people who hadn't heard it before, because the utility is obvious. In some universe where English was required to always make sense, the one-word or hyphenated forms would be the most likely, since two words implies that "bug" is an adjective.

It’s a “bug” and you “fix” it - so properly, in English, it’s a “bug fix” - but very often it’s shortened to “bugfix”.

Tryout my patch

sign out

sign in

smushor smoosh

smush

the Corpus was also used as a basis for grammar and language reference titles as well as dictionaries.

The element dem in epidemic, endemic, and pandemic comes from the ancient Greek word demos, which meant people or district:

ever present icon

Is "customizability" an English word? Yes. It is a root word in English, "custom," with English suffixes added according to the rules of English morphology. So even if it isn't in the dictionary, it is a perfectly legitimate English word.

Customizability is a popular word that arose of jargon in software and computer related circles . It is not yet a formally recognized and would not be correct utilized it is not yet a formally recognized and would not be correct utilized in formal writing outside of its common reference to the flexibility of a design and it's ability to be altered to fit the user.

There you’ll find a box housing the switch

except, as anticipated a little earlier, any custom services

f.ex.

user.timedout?(30.minutes.ago)

timeout

The exception, again, is the New York Times, where the one-word form is rare even on the blogs.

the spelling "Web site" (and the less questionable "web site") is an anachronism from the 1990s that is still in use by the NYT and some other conservative print media in the US while most others (including the online sections of the NYT!) today use "website".

Website is not a proper noun (as opposed to the Internet), hence not capitalized.

English tends to build new compound nouns by simply writing them as separate words with a blank. Once the compound is established (and the original parts somewhat "forgotten"), it's often written as one word or hyphenated. (Examples: shoelaces, aircraft...)

Web site / website seems to be somewhat in a transitional stage, being seen as an "entity" that web page hasn't reached yet. Depending on which dictionary you check you will find web site and website, but only web page, not webpage.

A website (also written as web site)

Marginalize provides a striking case of how thoroughly the figurative use of a word can take over the literal one.

to relegate to an unimportant or powerless position” (that is, to the metaphorical margins of society)

fallback

The question of whether or not it is "proper" is meaningless, unless you define the particular arbiter of manners who you want to defer to. There is no authority for the English language.

May I recommend the good old-fashioned non-confusing word capacity.

Different OS' have

The non-extension page, example.html

Very tendencious analysis.

The beforn seyd creatur was mech comfortyd bothe in body and in sowle be this good mannys wordys and gretly strengthyd in hir feyth. And than sche was bodyn be owyr Lord for to gon to an ankres in the same cyté whych hyte Dame Jelyan. And so sche dede and schewyd hir the grace that God put in hir sowle of compunccyon, contricyon, swetnesse and devocyon, compassyon wyth holy meditacyon and hy contemplacyon, and ful many holy spechys and dalyawns that owyr Lord spak to hir sowle, and many wondirful revelacyons whech sche schewyd to the ankres to wetyn yf ther wer any deceyte in hem, for the ankres was expert in swech thyngys and good cownsel cowd gevyn. The ankres, heryng the mervelyows goodnes of owyr Lord, hyly thankyd God wyth al hir hert for hys visitacyon, cownselyng this creatur to be obedyent to the wyl of owyr Lord God and fulfyllyn wyth al hir mygthys whatevyr he put in hir sowle yf it wer not ageyn the worshep of God and profyte of hir evyn cristen, for, yf it wer, than it wer nowt the mevyng of a good spyryte but rathyr of an evyl spyrit. The Holy Gost mevyth nevyr a thing ageyn charité, and, yf he dede, he wer contraryows to hys owyn self, for he is al charité. Also he mevyth a sowle to al chastnesse, for chast levars be clepyd the temple of the Holy Gost, and the Holy Gost makyth a sowle stabyl and stedfast in the rygth feyth and the rygth beleve. And a dubbyl man in sowle is evyr unstabyl and unstedfast in al hys weys. He that is evyrmor dowtyng is lyke to the flood of the see, the whech is mevyd and born abowte wyth the wynd, and that man is not lyche to receyven the gyftys of God. What creatur that hath thes tokenys he muste stedfastlych belevyn that the Holy Gost dwellyth in hys sowle. And mech mor, whan God visyteth a creatur wyth terys of contrisyon, devosyon, er compassyon, he may and owyth to levyn that the Holy Gost is in hys sowle. Seynt Powyl seyth that the Holy Gost askyth for us wyth mornynggys and wepyngys unspekable, that is to seyn, he makyth us to askyn and preyn wyth mornynggys and wepyngys so plentyuowsly that the terys may not be nowmeryd. Ther may non evyl spyrit gevyn thes tokenys, for Jerom seyth that terys turmentyn mor the devylle than don the peynes of helle. God and the devyl ben evyrmor contraryows, and thei schal nevyr dwellyn togedyr in on place, and the devyl hath no powyr in a mannys sowle. Holy Wryt seyth that the sowle of a rytful man is the sete of God, and so I trust, syster, that ye ben. I prey God grawnt yow perseverawns. Settyth al yowr trust in God and feryth not the langage of the world, for the mor despyte, schame, and repref that ye have in the world the mor is yowr meryte in the sygth of God. Pacyens is necessary unto yow for in that schal ye kepyn yowr sowle." Mych was the holy dalyawns that the ankres and this creatur haddyn be comownyng in the lofe of owyr Lord Jhesu Crist many days that thei were togedyr.

tell read_xlsx() take

We the first

all

as

data is collected

and applications to forecasting and estimation of dynamic causal effects.

Entreaties

mail box

[...] means that some text is missing. Brackets are necessary to avoid confusion. Without brackets, the reader might think that the original author used ellipsis. And the last thing we want when we quote text is to confuse the reader.

Falkland

and the field on which that patriot fell.

Charles I.

Hampden

we proceeded to Oxford

Gower

Goring

Because they're more integrated and try to serialize an incomplete system (e.g. one with some kind of side effects: from browser/library/runtime versions to environment to database/API changes), they will tend to have high false-negatives (failing test for which the production code is actually fine and the test just needs to be changed). False negatives quickly erode the team's trust in a test to actually find bugs and instead come to be seen as a chore on a checklist they need to satisfy before they can move on to the next thing.

Australian-ness. Australians, like the Scots, tend to call a spade a spade. The English aren’t usually so direct. Englishness is all about subtlety and insinuation.  Over the centuries, they have refined their public discourse and developed high-level, advanced techniques like (damning with) faint praise.

This phrase book is aimed to help newcomers to the U.S understand what some popular local idioms really mean.

注意！wait（for）有強調「時間流逝」或「遲到」的意味，在此不適用。

So don’t assume that there’s something wrong with your kid every time he’s anxious or upset. Our teenagers — and their brains — are up to the challenges of modern life.

The 40 Years’ War

“But beyond the pleasure of Dreyer’s prose and authorial tone, I think there is something else at play with the popularity of his book,” he explained. “To put it as simply as possible, the man cares, and we need people who care right now.”

“Bartleby, the Scrivener,” Herman Melville

ಹಾಲೆಂಜಲು ಪೆ[ಯ್ಯ]ನ, ಉದಕವೆಂಜಲು ಮತ್ಸ್ಯದ,ಪುಷ್ಪವೆಂಜಲು ತುಂಬಿಯ,ಎಂತು ಪೂಜಿಸುವೆ ಶಿವಶಿವಾ, ಎಂತು ಪೂಜಿಸುವೆಈ ಎಂಜಲನತಿಗಳೆವಡೆ ಎನ್ನಳವಲ್ಲ.ಬಂದುದ ಕೈಕೋ ಕೂಡಲಸಂಗಮದೇವಾ.

ಮುನಿದೆಯಾದಡೆ ಒಮ್ಮೆ ಜರೆದಡೆ ಸಾಲದೆಅಕಟಕಟಾ, ಮದನಂಗೆ ಮಾರುಗೊಡುವರೆಹಗೆಗೆ ಮಾರುಗೊಟ್ಟು ನಿನ್ನವರನೊಪ್ಪಿಸುವರೆಕೂಡಲಸಂಗಮದೇವಾ

ಹಂದಿಯೂ ಮದಕರಿಯೂ ಒಂದೇ ದಾರಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಸಂಧಿಸಿದಡೆ ಹಂದಿಗಂಜಿ ಮದಕರಿ ಕೆಲಕ್ಕೆ ಸಾರಿದಡೆ ಈ ಹಂದಿಯದು ಕೇಸರಿಯಪ್ಪುದೆ ಚೆನ್ನಮಲ್ಲಿಕಾರ್ಜುನಾ ?

ಅಮೃತಕ್ಕೆ ಹಸಿವುಂಟೆ ? ಜಲಕ್ಕೆ ತೃಷೆಯುಂಟೆ ?ಮಹಾಜ್ಞಾನಸ್ವರೂಪಂಗೆ ವಿಷಯವುಂಟೆ ?ಸದ್ಗುರುಕಾರುಣ್ಯವ ಪಡೆದು ಲಿಂಗಾರ್ಚನೆಯಂ ಮಾಡುವಮಹಾಭಕ್ತಂಗೆ ಬೇರೆ ಮುಕ್ತಿಯ ಬಯಕೆ ಉಂಟೆ ?ಅವರುಗಳಿಗೆ ಅದು ಸ್ವಯಂಭು ಸಹಜಸ್ವಭಾವ.ಇನ್ನು ತೃಪ್ತಿ ಅಪ್ಯಾಯನ ಅರಸಲುಂಟೆ ?ಉರಿಲಿಂಗಪೆದ್ದಿಪ್ರಿಯ ವಿಶ್ವೇಶ್ವರಾ.