10,000 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2020
    1. Decay to smaller Vacuum expectation value, resulting in decrease of Casimir effect and destabilization of proton.[6] Decay to vacuum with larger neutrino mass (may have happened relatively recently).[3] Decay to vacuum with no dark energy[4]

      The first one is a short 1989 letter to Nature. Though very technical it just seems to be an early discussion of the Higgs field metastability. As far as I can tell there is no mention of protons or the Cassimir effect. I looked at the talk page on Wikipedia and there is no discussion of this either. You get that in Wikipedia, some editor adds something, and nobody else checks it and it may often be wrong.

      http://ctp.lns.mit.edu/Wilczek_Nature/(72)vacuum_metastable.pdf

      The second one is the idea that neutrinos were originally massless and at some point in the recent past they transitioned to having a mass. That clearly was a transition with very minor effects if it did happen - since nothing happened to our Earth / solar system / galaxy etc. Even ancient supernovas which depend on neutrinos to explode seem to behave just like present day ones.

      So it is a very minor thing if it did happen. However this is just a hypothesis, and they say that their theory does not provide a clear explanation of certain cosmological discrepancies so that is a point against their theory as a hypothesis.

      The motivation for it is to explain a "mild tension" between the red shift measurements and cosmological background measurements for the varying density in the early universe.

      It's one of those theoretical studies that is highly unlikely to lead to anything but is still of theoretical interest enough to be published. By publishing it they help others who may be interested to know if a time varying neutrino mass is worth onsidering, and maybe deelop their ideas in other directions. As it is, it's not a very likely theory.

      The last one, metastable dark energy is a different theory from the Higgs field and is a modern idea that has several papers on the topic by many authors, the most recent I found was in 2020. It seems to be about an exponential decay like radioactive decay where dark energy gradually over time decays to dark matter. I.e. the dark energy is metastable but it only decays bit by bit rather than all at once and has been decaying like this for billions of years.

      https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.03790.pdf

      As a general point, our universe has lasted for 138 million centuries. If it could decay in some abrupt way, then this has to be incredibly unlikely for any given century, or with near total certainty, it would have happened already billions of years ago.

      So, any vacuum decay theory has to explain that. If a theory predicts with near total certainty that our universe collapsed over 13 billion years ago, say, then there is something wrong with the theory.

      It is sometimes run the other way around, to use observation of our current universe, that it has existed for 138 million centuries as a way to argue that a theory can't be correct if it predicts an easy decay of the universe to some other state

    1. It’s not always easy to find the balance between shrugging off offensive messages and counterproductive scolding, but individuals can speak up about ageist generalizations

      in closing its about people speaking up and being aware of how age and connection do rely on makinbg the connections ourselves, we just have to make better habits, or incorprate ideas that pursue anti agiesm

    1. Make it personal: Use photographs and story to creative a narrative about the product so that consumers feel that they are not just buying an object but becoming part of a story.

      It's always a good idea to make a connection with your audience and make them feel included. This paragraph is really short.

    1. It's so interesting to see that Aegism exists because just like the article says, the group was on the other side before, and the other side will one day or another become a part of that group.

    1. It's truly disheartening to see that older people are being counted just as statistics compared to if a younger person affected with the virus would probably cause a commotion. We can see that the older people are being more affected, but they truly aren't just stats for the world to see.

    2. It's interesting to see how people are viewing older people in our society. I knew that most of the patients of COVID 19 were older folk, but never once did I think that it was just "their" problem.

  2. Jun 2020
    1. I sometimes think about the fact that if my credit card number is compromised, I can quickly get a new number and go on with my life. If my biometric information is somehow compromised, I cannot ever rescind it.

      Hi Allie, I really liked this example! It makes for a simple explanation and comparison. You lose your credit card and you can do something about it immediately, but you lose your biometric print and you can't do anything about it, it's just that simple.

  3. griersmusings.wordpress.com griersmusings.wordpress.com
    1. Why, why now?Child of Zeus with the shield ofthunder,why come now?To witness the outrage Agamemnon just committed?1 tell you this, and so help me it's thetruth-he'll soon pay for his arrogance with his life!

      he believes that Athena has come to tell him to kill Agamemnon

  4. jenkinscat.gsslab.pnq.redhat.com:8080 jenkinscat.gsslab.pnq.redhat.com:8080
    1. already on persistent volume in Maven and Java plug-in containers

      The persistent volumes are defined in the devfiles, not the plugins. In our sample stacks, the .m2 directory is already made persistent. The way it's formulated, the user might think that this is automatic when using the Java plugin, for example.

      Maybe it's sufficient to just write "In our default maven devfiles..." instead of "By default..."

    1. trust is a polarizing strategy, and it's one that is important to apply early on in the relationship before someone becomes important to you. If you trust someone excessively and it goes badly, but they don't matter to you, you can just kick them to the curb. In general, trusting someone at a level that seems slightly excessive for their level of importance to you will help you sort people in your life who you want to be more important to you than they are from those who you want to be less important than they are.

      Extending more trust at first sorts the the wheat from the chaffe before there is too much investment in friendship

    1.    And some say, too, that we do love the best To be quite free to do our own behest, And that no man reprove us for our vice, But saying we are wise, take our advice.

      It's really sad to see the amount of women in these tales who just want to live a free life.

    1. News can no longer be (only) about the mass update. Stories need to be targeted to those who might be able to improve the situation. And journalism’s products — which are more than its stories — must be designed to facilitate this. News needs to be built to engage curiosity about the world and the problems in it — and their solutions. People need to get lost in the news like they now get lost in Wikipedia and Facebook. There must be comprehensive stories that get the interested but uninformed up to speed quickly. Search and navigation must be improved to the point where satisfaction of curiosity is so easy it becomes a reflex. Destination news sites need to be more extensively hyperlinked than almost anything else (and not just insincere internal links for SEO, but links that are actually useful for the user.) The news experience needs to become intensely personal. It must be easy for users to find and follow exactly their interests, no matter how arcane. Journalists need to get proficient at finding and engaging the audience for each story. And all of this has to work across all modes of delivery, so it’s always with us. Marketers understand this; it’s amazing to me that the news industry has been so slow to catch on to multi-modal engagement.

      everything would work perfectly if we had all of these and people are actually rational and diligent with infinite resource.

    1. Byte, in contrast, flaunts its origins in the United States and emphasizes privacy. “Explore what’s loved by the community, handpicked by our human editors, or just served up at random,” its description reads.

      I feel like this is a naïve approach. If you decide to be in the business of social media, you need to fully commit to the standards of it, at least to start with. It's naïve to believe that you will be able to compete with such an "honest" approach, when everyone else isn't.

    1. Prismatic gets a percentage of the revenue increase that it generates for publishers, while developers pay a flat monthly fee based on usage, Cross says. It’s still working out pricing for hedge fund API usage. (As a point of comparison, the revenue model for the old Prismatic was the same as the current model for publishers. “We just meant for it to be more like Adsense/Adwords where we ran all this in our own consumer products too,” Cross notes.)

      the plague of monetisation

    1. The legal system, Horwitz argued, was used to not only change the rules of the game to benefit an increasingly elite class, but also to hide the fact that these changes were being made.  This is a great argument. What it needs is some people in the story to show how it happened and how people reacted, assuming anyone on the short end of the transaction knew it was happening. This raises an interesting question: how do we tell stories about things we now see were happening, but that people of the time were unaware of, either because the evidence was hidden, or they just didn’t see things the way we do? Especially when people knew something was wrong, but couldn’t quite put their finger on it -- or blamed it on the wrong thing? The story isn’t just about unintended consequences, it’s about misunderstood consequences.
    1. Students will prepareand turn in3-5 minute presentations regarding one of the five key issues

      Is this something they've been working on throughout the semester? Monday seems early if it's just assigned that week. Presentation is also a term that tends to get used for "big" projects.

    1. Salah or Salat
      #deyallmadabouteuthenasiadriatic #ccweyreondatanspock #iamthatiam #thisisjemspeakingarehologemsiswear

      cary Dnacari of Corinth; we cannot just ignore "what's right and what's wrong," simply because a book tells us it's ... "what we should do." We've traveled this road before, and we can all be sure of that--see it's brought us back, 'to help all" out of the ... same, same old story.

    1. And right now there’s some interesting debate going on about this layer of accessibility, with different voices making conflicting claims about the degree to which it’s possible (and desirable) to change the way scholarship is written and presented so that it will be more accessible to those who read it.

      I've never felt more dumb than trying to read some scholarly articles - which has always made me wonder if the writing was intentionally obfuscated, or if I was really just that behind. Does everything NEED jargon? Does jargon only sound like jargon when you don't understand / aren't at the appropriate excellence level to read the article?

    1. I can care about someone but not have to be responsible for that said person, and that is my right and my choice. The world and everyone who runs it should not make us take that extra responsibility onto our already full plate. I expect myself to obey the laws, pay my taxes, recycle, and help whenever I can, but again, that is a choice, my choice.

      This helps clarify the point above some. I understand that you are saying you can care without having responsibility for someone. Is that right? If so, what does that look like exactly? How can one care about another person but not be willing to adjust behavioral choices for their well-being? Isn't caring just something we say at that point? Is caring an abstract notion or thought, or does it manifest itself in action? Maybe say more on this.

      Also, do you put "obeying laws" in with choices or do you feel more compelled in this regard? If you are willing to follow laws but not otherwise show responsibility for others, are you saying it requires an act of congress (or the State General Assembly) to "force" you to be responsible to the larger community?

      I know I'm asking hard questions, but your statements seem rather absolute. I suspect it's more complicated--not a binary choice between responsibility and no responsibility, but rather a question of degree. (Think about your "universe of obligation" with those concentric circles.) Can you explore this more?

    1. Effective Headhunting Techniques for Hiring Leave a Comment / Blog Contact Headhunters are individuals who are employed by an organization or enterprise to discover, vet, and present reasonable possibility for a vocation position. The headhunter’s main responsibility is to guarantee the competitor has the right range of abilities for a position and they’re frequently recruited to discover possibilities that have a one of a kind or elusive range of abilities. When in doubt, headhunters are self-employed entities or workers of an enlisting organization. They are recruited and appointed by an organization searching for top notch ability and regularly work for a few organizations at a given time. It’s normal for headhunters to have some expertise in a field, for example, tech or showcasing. Headhunting recruitment permits them to filter through resumes to find the most ideal contender for an occupation speedier and all the more proficiently. At the point when your organization needs new ability, the initial step is to begin selecting exceptionally qualified possibility for the activity. At the point when you realize how to isolate the quality goods from the refuse, it’s simpler to locate the ideal contender for your organization. Sadly, this can now and then be actually quite difficult. By what method can your specialty prevail with regards to finding the most ideal contender for your organization’s vacant positions? Here’s your bit by bit control. You can push all the extraordinary sets of expectations you need, it despite everything won’t get your image the perfect applicant except if your area of expertise knows how to scout. While trusting that up-and-comers will apply is detached, scouting is a functioning procedure that gives your group a superior possibility of finding the ideal contender for your activity. At the point when you figure out how to scout the correct way, finding the most qualified competitors is simpler than any time in recent memory. Here are five hints to help your area of expertise scout the best applicant. Have HR Gotten the Message Out With Workers To discover profoundly qualified contenders for your activity, start by tapping your current representative system. To do this, have your area of expertise spread some verbal data about the position that is open, the sort of up-and-comers you’re searching for, and the necessities for the post. With any karma, your worker system will impart the news to their certified companions with your area of expertise, which serves to bring you preferable ability over you could have in any case gotten to. On the off chance that you’d prefer to make this a stride further, think about posting updates on your accessible opening via web-based networking media. This makes it simple for your current representatives to impart the post to their certified loved ones. Your area of expertise ought to likewise make posts on LinkedIn and Twitter or head to a public exhibition, where your workers can get the message out of your situation to passers-by. Send Representatives into Your Trade Groups To enhance your scouting procedure, urge your HR division to scour the exchange bunches you take an interest in. Since you’ve just got these associations, presently is an excellent opportunity to benefit as much as possible from them. To begin, plan a portrayal of your activity and send it out to chiefs, thought pioneers and industry heads in your specialty. You may likewise decide to utilize phone systems administration to get the message out about your accessible position and get individuals intrigued. While organizing everywhere is a keen method to draw in more contender to your position, organizing inside your trade groups is exceptionally focused on method of arriving at new up-and-comers. Since trade groups draw in a quite certain gathering of individuals, they’re extraordinary spots to search for applicants with exceptional aptitudes or interests. This, thus, chops down the time you’ll spend scouting and guarantees you’ll locate a superior applicant quicker and simpler. Optimize Your Site Your site is your biggest resource, so why not use it to get the message out about your vacant position? In the event that you don’t have a Careers page, your area of expertise should work with the organization’s tech or IT group to make one at this point. In the event that you do have a Careers page, be certain it includes a compact, elegantly composed set of working responsibilities that will interest possible competitors. Recollect that there are many dry, slow sets of expectations out there, which implies you’ll do well to make yours drawing in and captivating – consider recruiting proficient journalists in the event that you need help. The more you can make your set of working responsibilities energizing, the almost certain it is you’ll draw in all around qualified, drew in, intrigued up-and-comers who will smooth out your scouting procedure and make it simpler to fill your vacant position a lot quicker. Catch Up With Intrigued Leads In the event that you have leads intrigued by your task, make certain to catch up with them in like manner. Keeping in touch with the leads who contact your organization about an occupation is a brilliant method to prop the energy up and guarantee these gifted candidates consider your to be as a drew in and dynamic business. While there are many approaches to stay in contact with intrigued up-and-comers, probably the most practical are welcoming possibility to buy into a bulletin, lining up after a meeting with email, and making a pre-programmed message that thanks intrigued contender for their applications. Guaranteeing your area of expertise is dynamic about getting the telephone and calling up-and-comers can help, too. Take advantage of Innovation There are many approaches to enroll new applicants utilizing the web. Notwithstanding making posts via web-based networking media, it’s anything but difficult to utilize the web to post positions on proficient scouting locales, merchant destinations and arranged advertisement locales. The web likewise gives a direct and smoothed out approach to check the viability of your post. In case you’re not getting the candidates you need, consider changing your methodology likewise. At the point when you outfit innovation in your scouting, it’s simpler to arrive at a more extensive choice of up-and-comers, guarantee your activity posting mirrors the quality and commitment of your organization and win yourself a situation among the positions of the most wanted managers. Being Conceivable This is a key point. When directing an official pursuit, high-esteem applicants don’t need their time squandered with theoretical openings for work. On the off chance that the selection representative doesn’t accept that the up-and-comer they’re reaching is directly for the job, in what capacity will the applicant ever trust it themselves? As selection representatives, we make it understood to every competitor we approach that they are an ideal fit. Furthermore, this isn’t simply a mystery. In light of our examination, we realize that each individual we converse with is an ideal choice for the activity. Advocating Straightforwardness We’ve all run over employments that look excessively great to be valid. This absence of genuineness, shockingly, prompts numerous up-and-comers being suspicious about jobs they’re advertised. Talent scouts get this, which is the reason they champion straightforwardness. It bodes well. You wouldn’t have any desire to be told about work that sounded intriguing however was totally unique when you discovered increasingly about it, okay? Since talent scouts are specialists in your industry, they are well prepared to introduce openings for work obviously and answer any inquiries precisely. This gives the competitor certainty and guarantees the enrollment procedure is a smooth one.

      Headhunting is a practice that involves prospecting a candidate for a specific position. using effective Headhunting techniques the hiring becomes effective.

    1. With respect to justice, my view is that there are various obtaining states of affairs concern­ing justice, and that when individual people have the property of being just, it is (in part) in virtue of the obtaining of some of these states of affairs.

      So justice isn't some thing that exists somewhere. It's a well-defined attribute that some people and actions have. This shows that Craig's argument was sloppy.

      I don't know though, if I'm the Christian here, then I'm just like, "Why this specific attribute? What gives it meaning?" and I feel like I've rephrased the substantive part of Craig's argument in a way that still holds.

    1. How much learning occurs when students and teachers operate in a state of  natural default learning?

      Some learning can occur in the default learning state, though it's likely to be more superficial. I'm thinking of something that would require memorization or recall, like the Periodic Table. Though maybe that isn't learning, maybe it should just be its own category?

    2. How much learning occurs when students and teachers operate in a state of  natural default learning?

      When we're in a state of default learning, we aren't preparing ourselves for the unexpected. Sometimes the unexpected moments in learning (and teaching) are the most rewarding. I once taught Gertrude Stein's "Tender Buttons" to a group of undergraduates when I was getting my MFA and it was a struggle. It's a really difficult text that doesn't lend itself well to traditional teaching. The students were frustrated, I was frustrated, but we kept trying new things. The issue with the text is you're not really supposed to "get" it. You're supposed to connect with it on some level which the students weren't used to. Anyway, finally one student read a passage while the others closed their eyes. "What do you see?" I asked them but I really didn't think they all saw the same thing, or anything at all. Almost unanimously they all said "dust." It was such a breakthrough for all of them to realize that even though the text was difficult, and didn't seem to make any sense, they all connected with it in this way. There was no mention of dust in the passage, the passage was about stamps, so it was amazing to all involved that this word came up. The students literally cheered. For just a moment, it felt like default learning was broken.

    1. It’s not specified to be a male or female, as no indication is provided but it also could depict a falling warrior seen by just a helmet on the left side.

      Though the gender is not indicated on the artifact and the Scythians made use of both female and male warriors, it can easily be seen in this jar fragment that the warrior is a man because of the mustache and the beard.

    1. Is that pleasant or amusing for them? No, it isn't.

      I think what's most offensive about this write-up is not Mark's assumption that whites and men "just have it fine and dandy!" — it's that he assumes minorities, say, are uniformly pro-identitarianism and are fully on board with everything he's saying about what they supposedly experience. It reveals how he's never bothered to peep his head above the trenches to see who the other side actually is.

    2. then, sorry, dude, but you're part of the problem. But hey, it's a solveable problem— you can get better!

      "So, join our cult!" The analyses that present this far-left culture dominating culture as a religion are fascinating and seem pretty on-point. Just uncanny.

    1. Reading is like a puzzle when you approach it for the first time. It's easier to solve the puzzle when you approach it from common knowledge. In other words, children can learn to sound out words, but if they don't know the word it takes them longer to understand the meaning, and understanding the meaning is the whole point of reading.

      As many of my classmates have said, this would be like learning two puzzles at the same time. Thinking about my students, it is much easier to understand, read and use a word that is familiar to them. When we are learning new vocabulary words for example, my students are learning about the meaning and becoming familiar with them before they would try to use them. Just like anything else, if you have background knowledge in a topic, word or place, it is easier to navigate through it. This is the same from reading. When an ELL student is learning how to read in English for the first time, having understanding of words and meaning in their L1 would be key for them to learn and use the English words being taught.

    2. For instance, say you're reading about the state fair. If a child has never been to a fair and has never seen cotton candy or a corndog, it's much harder for them to understand what they are reading than it is for a child who goes to the fair every year. For that child, the words are just describing something they already know. They have a context for the words.

      I agree, students need to get explanation first. If they do not know what a certain word or phrase typical for a specific language means, it will be harder for them to get the context of the whole text. For example, when I went to school, we read a book in English too. It was hard for me to understand some chapters since there were some phrases which were used in a strange context as I earlier thought. However, that time I did not know that, for instance, French windows are not actually windows. When I read that someone walked through the French window, it sounded very strange for me. I had to look for its meaning by myself. That is why it is better either to teach children the meaning of such words or to provide them with the books that contain the words and phrases they already know. There is not such a big problem if students do not know the meaning of some ordinary words, they can translate them, but if they do not know the words specific for a certain language or culture, they need to hear the explanation.

    3. So we ended up having students as old as ninth grade who had never held a pencil. With no school experiences, children don't have a concept of literacy. It's hard to know what a book is for if you've never seen one.

      "It's hard to know what a book is for if you've never seen one." This quote really popped out to me because of the startling shock value of it. I couldn't help but think of my own education, all the way back to grade school through high school and college and all the advantages I had growing up, including access to a good education, including reading and writing supplies and excellent teachers along the way. I also think of my current students and the elementary building I teach at. Our students are so well equipped. I suppose this quote just blatantly pointed out the reality that many children in the world do not have the advantage of access to education and learning materials/teachers. This quote makes me grateful that I am a teacher and am contributing in my own small way to help a very big global problem: gaps in education and literacy.

    4. Being bilingual is not the same as being biliterate.

      I really like this quote. I think it's important for teachers especially to keep this in mind in the classroom. We so often have so much material to cover and we just run through it expecting our ELL students to understand as much as the English speakers simply because they can communicate with us. I think it's important to not only be sure the material in English is at the level of those ELL students but also to be sure we are checking in with them on a regular basis. It may be embarrassing or difficult for them to say in class or even privately to us that they are not understanding the content, so it's incumbent upon us to check-in with them in a non-threatening way.

    1. The deplorable condition of the literature of to-day … is due to the fact that books are written for the sake of earning money. Every one who is in want of money sits down and writes a book, and the public is stupid enough to buy it.

      and this was true even in the 1800s.

      it's just human / society conditions

      incentives, money, social roles

    1. I took this as an almost alchemical act. After all, alchemy is more than just transmuting literal lead into literal gold. It's the transmutation of a base substance into something better. Through calcination and dissolution, the base - the *prima materia*, the self, the fox - is broken down. Through separation, conjunction, and fermentation, something new is compiled from what was in rough shapes. Through distillation and coagulation, the new self - the cat - is solidified, completed, made whole. As with a lot of how I experience furry, this is a microcosm, rather than something unique. I am not the only one to be deliberate about changing my species, just as I'm not the only one to read way too much into the furry fandom. Furry, as a whole, is an exercise in self-actualization. It is taking the idea of "this is how I want to be seen" to places and extents not often tread. Through each aspect of ourselves, we choose how we want to interact. We choose a species, we choose a name, we choose what aspects of our personalities to show to each other and the world. We construct and create every day of our lives, and we're made all the better for it. Shameless boosterism aside, we're good at what we do and what we make, whether that's art or fun or just ourselves. The more we create, the better we get at it, too. All that's left to do is to keep on creating, to keep putting our intent and our will to work. Just as I can dig into the intent behind changing a name, a fursona, an identity, I can look for the magic of self-actualization within furry as a whole. After all, furry is magic.

      This ties back into an earlier passage in this article. Furry-ism(?) is an exercise in self-actualization. Break 'em down and build 'em up. Throughout our lives, we are encouraged to change ourselves for the better, and this is a parallel to that.

      Shared experience? Prime material and its relation?

    1. Poor People’s Campaign

      It's June 20, 2020 and I just finished watching two hours live of the Poor People's Campaign. As I heard calls for cuts to the military budget I asked "what about the jobs that would be lost?" I wondered how this was being addressed, so I went to the web site, and saw that this budget could be downloaded. I did not know it was more than 120 pages long! However, I did open it and skimmed through to pages 104 and 105 where the cuts to the military were itemized and where there was a discussion of lost jobs and how to replace those.

      That satisfied my curiosity, however, in opening this, I was called to read the whole thing. I decided to put it on Hypothesis so I could highlight and annotate as I read. I'm starting now. It will take a few days to read the entire budget.

    1. Now, for some people, it's getting under their skin.

      I know that technology is really getting closer and closer to our body just like the iPhone, but when I read this article I was surprised because I never knew that technology getting under some one’s skin.

    2. "Identity ideally is about you and how you feel and what you believe has shaped you," Michelle Ling responds.

      I think maybe I'm more concerned with Identity than I thought I was. This line stuck out to me a lot, because on an individual level this is okay and I understand loving yourself/being happy with yourself/your journey, but what happens to this when it's collectively challenged by people just like you? Does it invalidate that at all? I'm not totally sure.

    3. Over the last couple of weeks, some major companies have signaled that remote work is here to stay. The heads of three of New York City's largest commercial tenants — JPMorgan Chase, Barclays and Morgan Stanley — have each said it's highly unlikely that all their employees will return to their Manhattan skyscrapers. It's not just banks. Google has axed deals to buy up 2 million square feet of urban office space. Jack Dorsey, Twitter's CEO, told his employees they will be allowed to work remotely forever. With so many high-paid jobs untethered from their urban offices, we've been wondering what this all means for the future of cities. So we called up Harvard University professor Ed Glaeser, the leading scholar of urban economics. In 2011, he published a great book with a title that pretty much sums up decades of research: Triumph of the City: How Our Greatest Invention Makes Us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier, and Happier. Some of his subtitle's adjectives feel very untrue at the moment, and we wanted to know if he still thinks cities will triumph. Glaeser remains a champion of cities, but he says it's possible they're in for a long period of trouble. He remembers the New York City he grew up in during the 1970s. Back then, manufacturers left, poverty got worse, crime and drugs pushed families into the suburbs, property values plummeted and the city almost declared bankruptcy. That dark period for New York and other cities, he says, "should remind us that urban success is not foreordained."
    1. Pressley: How many extremist murders has the FBI linked to Black Lives Matter or similar black activist groups? McGarrity: We don’t work Black Lives Matter it’s a movement. It’s an ideology. We don’t work that. Pressley: So the answer is none. Can you just say that for the record? There has been no killing that the FBI can link to black Lives Matter or similar black activist groups, to your knowledge.McGarrity: To my knowledge—I’d have to go back—but to my knowledge, right now, no.

      This is a surprisingly clear look into the motives & actions of the FBI. If we take was McGarrity is saying to be truthful, then although black extremist-adjacent topics may have been linked to murders, Black Lives Matter is not a focus for the FBI. This is positive, as there is no evidence linking Black Lives Matter to the types of hate crimes historically committed by white supremacist groups.

    1. Learners need to be exposed to what Krashen calls 'comprehensible input' – that is, exposure to interesting and understandable listening and reading material.

      Of course, this is just Krashen's hypothesis, but I could see a few points where this gets tricky when translating it to real-life classrooms. I think back to the beginner level classes I've taught- what input exactly is "comprehensible" to them? Especially because a lot of times, the lowest level classes may just be a catch-all for the students that couldn't score high enough into the next levels. From my experience, their individual understandings varied quite greatly. It's not always the simplest task to find material that is both interesting and understandable to each student. This is even truer as the students get older. If you are teaching adults at a very basic level of English who don't have much prior exposure to it, what they can understand will be quite different from what is interesting to them. There will always be a few categories that widely engage students - sports, music, movies, travel, food, etc. I suppose it is important to find many sources of materials to try and balance the interesting and understandable aspects of them.

    2. Krashen makes the important point that comprehensible input needs to be at the right level for the learner, namely just higher than the learner's own

      Both NEIU classes I am taking the summer have been focusing on Krashen. This week both have mentioned comprehensible input. I already use a lot of strategies, such as, visuals, organizers, word walls, songs, anchor charts, dances, games, and videos. My ESL teacher at my school assess and provides me with the ACCESS level of my students. I have been focusing most of my language at their level, but missing the importance of the 5 to 10% above their level. To better understand Comprehensible Input, I searched for many different examples in the classroom. It's amazing to me how much easier learning for students can be when comprehensible input is used.

    1. Post an introduction assignment that is less about content

      Something that I struggle with somewhat is the tendency for intro activities to be these great moments where students can project their true selves into the learning community—and then that disappears from the rest of the course. Looking for ways to help keep this alive throughout the term. For example, do you build formal, though perhaps no/low credit assignments, that require students to learn about their classmates or use that information somehow? I fear students feeling that they have this chance to project their own persona, but it’s just pro forma and doesn’t matter.

    1. The right acknowledgment of black justice, humanity, freedom and happiness won’t be found in your book clubs, protest signs, chalk talks or organizational statements. It will be found in your earnest willingness to dismantle systems that stand in our way — be they at your job, in your social network, your neighborhood associations, your family or your home. It’s not just about amplifying our voices, it’s about investing in them and in our businesses, education, political representation, power, housing and art.

      so important

    1. Highly will shut down its iOS and Slack app on April 26th, though it promises that “No highlights will be harmed.”

      It's too bad that Twitter shut down the highly.co website. Now all the highly.co links in tweets are dead. Great job, Twitter. You just killed a ton of links that people saved.

    1. UTF-16 is generally considered a bad idea today. It seems almost intentionally designed to invite mistakes. It’s easy to write programs that pretend code units and characters are the same thing. And if your language doesn’t use two-unit characters, that will appear to work just fine. But as soon as someone tries to use such a program with some less common Chinese characters, it breaks. Fortunately, with the advent of emoji, everybody has started using two-unit characters, and the burden of dealing with such problems is more fairly distributed.

      💯

    1. That’s it. That’s the practice. It’s often been said that it’s very simple, but it’s not necessarily easy. The work is to just keep doing it. Results will accrue.

      The writer concludes the article quickly, but simple and concise. It's simple, not easy, keep doing it, results will happen.

    2. When we think about meditating (with a capital M), we can get hung up on thinking about our thoughts: we’re going to do something about what’s happening in our heads. It’s as if these bodies we have are just inconvenient sacks for our brains to lug around.

      Here the writer talks about one of the negative reasons people don't meditate and tries to convey that it is incorrect.

    1. Anti-Racist Resources from Greater Good In response to the killing of unarmed black people by police, we gathered Greater Good pieces that explore our potential to reduce prejudice in society and in ourselves. By Greater Good | June 3, 2020 Print Bookmark Our mission at the Greater Good Science Center is to elevate the human potential for compassion. But that does not mean we deny or dismiss the human potential for violence, particularly toward marginalized or dehumanized groups. A demonstration outside the Minneapolis Police Fourth Precinct building following the officer-involved shooting of Jamar Clark on November 15, 2015. © Tony Webster, Black Lives Matter Minneapolis For centuries, African Americans and other communities of color have been subject to this physical and structural violence, denied their humanity and often their basic right to exist. That’s why we are gathering Greater Good pieces that explore our potential to reduce bias and contribute to racial justice. The science we cover reveals the considerable psychological and structural challenges we are up against. But it also gives hope that another world is possible. You can read our latest coverage on racism, diversity, and bridging differences—or start with the key articles below. We’ll continue to update this page with resources for individuals, parents, and educators. Click to jump to a section: Advertisement X Meet the Greater Good Toolkit From the GGSC to your bookshelf: 30 science-backed tools for well-being. –The psychological roots of racism –How to overcome bias in yourself –Confronting racism –Reducing bias in criminal justice –Building bridges –Resources for parents –Resources for educators –More anti-racism resources The psychological roots of racism Understanding Our New Racial Reality Starts with the Unconscious: Egalitarian goals can be undermined by deeply rooted implicit biases, says john a. powell. To address racial discrimination, we need to look inward. Look Twice: Susan T. Fiske has some bad news: Prejudice might be hardwired in our brains. But the good news is that we can still learn to override our prejudices and embrace difference. Racism Is Not a Mental Illness: Many people argue that racism must be a form of mental illness. What does the science suggest? The Psychology of Taking a Knee: The backlash against protests by Colin Kaepernick and other athletes raises scientific questions about body language, power, and group dynamics. Can Threats to Humanity Make Us More Prejudiced?: Research suggests that prejudice increases in the face of threats like climate change, recessions, and epidemics. How the Pandemic Divides Us: Physical distance protects us from COVID-19, but it also gives rise to some of the ugliest human tendencies. What’s Driving Political Violence in America?: Hate crimes are rising, and so is support for political violence. New research explores why—and what we can do to stop it. How to overcome bias in yourselfHow to Stop the Racist in You: The new science of bias suggests that we all carry prejudices within ourselves—and we all have the tools to keep them in check. The Egalitarian Brain: Research on the neuroscience of prejudice is revealing how the brain can overcome our fears and racial biases, reports David Amodio. How to Fight Racism Through Inner Work: Rhonda Magee explains how mindfulness-based awareness and compassion is key to racial justice work. How Mindfulness Can Defeat Racial Bias: There might be a solution to implicit racial bias, argues Rhonda Magee: cultivating moment-to-moment awareness of thoughts, feelings, and surroundings. How to Avoid Picking Up Prejudice from the Media: News, entertainment, and social media shape how we behave toward different groups of people. How can we limit negative influences? How to Beat Stereotypes by Seeing People as Individuals: We often judge people by their group membership—but research suggests other ways to see each other. Shared Identity How to encourage generosity by finding commonalities between people. Try It Now Confronting racism Why Telling Our Own Story Is So Powerful for Black Americans: Andrea Collier reflects on the role of storytelling in black American history—and in her own life. How Can We Stop Prejudice in a Pandemic?: Recent studies reveal how knowledge helps defeats prejudice in the face of a health crisis. Can the Science of Purpose Help Explain White Supremacy?: A sense of purpose makes us physically and psychologically stronger. But what if your purpose is hateful and destructive? Eight Ways to Stand Up to Hate: Hate crimes and hateful language are on the rise. What are you going to do about it? From Othering to Belonging: In a Science of Happiness podcast, we explore racial justice, well-being, and widening our circles of connection and concern. How to Sustain Your Activism: These three principles can help activists avoid burnout and continue working toward a better world. Reducing bias in criminal justiceCan We Reduce Bias in Criminal Justice?: Research explores how unconscious racial biases affect the criminal justice system, and how to mitigate those effects. How to Reduce Racial Profiling: Evidence says that implicit racial bias influences police in deciding which cars to stop. But there’s a better way, argues Jack Glaser. Three Ways to Reduce Implicit Bias in Policing: Can we correct for unconscious prejudice in law enforcement? Former police officer Tracie Keesee says yes. Can Police Departments Reduce Implicit Bias?: Oakland’s assistant police chief says that law enforcement must work hard to reduce implicit bias and create a new path for police-community relations. But the problem is not intractable. How Challenging Stereotypes Can Save Black Lives : When police stereotype African Americans, the results can be deadly. But new studies suggest ways to help all of us see each other as complex human beings. Bridging Differences Playbook Learn research-based strategies to promote positive dialogue and understanding Read It Now Building bridgesWhat Makes a Good Interaction Between Divided Groups?: Intergroup contact can help bridge divides, under certain conditions. What Happens When You Tell Your Story and I Tell Mine?: Sometimes, empathy isn’t enough. New research reveals how taking and giving perspectives can help us to bridge our differences. Five Ways to Have Better Conversations Across Difference: It’s not easy, but we can find common ground in difficult conversations. Thoughts on Awkward Relationships and Bridging Divides: In a Science of Happiness podcast, comedian W. Kamau Bell discusses the challenges of finding common ground, even with people in your own family. What Will It Take to Bridge Our Differences?: Here are some core insights from the GGSC’s virtual summit on dialogue and understanding across our differences. Resources for parents How Adults Can Support the Mental Health of Black Children: Psychologist Riana Elyse Anderson explains how families can communicate about race and cope with racial stress and trauma. Rubbing Off: Allison Briscoe-Smith explains how kids learn about race—and how their parents can help them make sense of difference. How to Talk with Your Kids about Donald Trump: Trump is creating fear and confusion in children, especially kids of color. Here are three suggestions for talking with kids about race and racism in the media. How to Read Racist Books to Your Kids: Should parents ignore or excise racist imagery in children’s books? Jeremy Adam Smith offers another way, guided by research. How Adults Communicate Bias to Children: A new study suggests preschoolers can “catch” prejudice from grown-ups through nonverbal behavior—and it hints at solutions. Five Ways to Reduce Racial Bias in Your Children: How do we combat racial prejudice? New research reveals how parents influence the formation of bias in children. How to Raise Kids Who Are More Tolerant Than You: How can we avoid feeding hate and distrust in our children? Helping Kids Process Violence, Trauma, and Race in a World of Nonstop News, from Common Sense: A conversation with Drs. Allison Briscoe-Smith, Jacqueline Dougé, and Nathan Chomilo. Resources for educators Resources to Support Anti-Racist Learning: Read a message from the Greater Good Education team along with articles, books, practices for teachers and students, organizations to follow, and other resources to support anti-racist educators. More anti-racism resources Our Mental Health Minute: A video series created by psychologists Riana Anderson and Shawn Jones to provide mental health resources for the black community. Campaign Zero: Research to identify effective solutions to end police violence, provide technical assistance to organizers leading police accountability campaigns, and support the development of model legislation and advocacy to end police violence nationwide. The Association of Black Psychologists: An organization seeking the liberation of the African Mind, empowerment of the African Character, and enlivenment and illumination of the African Spirit. NAACP Coronavirus Resources: A wide-ranging list of pandemic resources for the black community from the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). Black Lives Matter: A global organization that campaigns against violence and systemic racism toward black people. Othering & Belonging Institute: Brings together researchers, organizers, stakeholders, communicators, and policymakers to identify and eliminate the barriers to an inclusive, just, and sustainable society in order to create transformative change. The Equal Justice Initiative: Committed to ending mass incarceration and excessive punishment in the United States, to challenging racial and economic injustice, and to protecting basic human rights for the most vulnerable people in American society. Official George Floyd Memorial Fund: Fund established to assist the children and other family members of George Floyd as they seek justice. Official Justice for Breonna Taylor Memorial Fund: Fund established to support the friends and family members of Breonna Taylor as they seek justice for her murder. Anti-racism resources for white people: A compilation of books, podcasts, articles, and other media to help white people, particularly parents, better understand racism, their own role in it, and what they can do to help dismantle it Get the science of a meaningful education delivered to your inbox. Submit About the Author Greater Good Greater Good magazine turns scientific research into stories, tips, and tools for a happier life and a more compassionate society. You May Also Enjoy Why Telling Our Own Story Is So Powerful for Black Americans By Andrea Collier February 27, 2019 How Inequality Can Make Wealthy People Less Cooperative By Jill Suttie September 23, 2015 How the “Strong Black Woman” Identity Both Helps and Hurts By Kara Manke December 5, 2019 What Inequality Does to Kids By Diana Divecha December 1, 2015 How Unequal Discipline Hurts Black Students By Carrie Spector February 6, 2020 White Racism May Hurt the Health of Both Whites and Blacks By Yasmin Anwar September 8, 2016 Comments // DISQUS var disqus_shortname = 'greatergoodscience'; var disqus_identifier = 7132; // for Raising Happiness, we can't always use the entry ID but for other items, we can. var disqus_title = "Anti-Racist Resources from Greater Good"; (function() { var dsq = document.createElement('script'); dsq.type = 'text/javascript'; dsq.async = true; dsq.src = '//' + disqus_shortname + '.disqus.com/embed.js'; (document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] || document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]).appendChild(dsq); })(); Please enable JavaScript to view the <a href="http://disqus.com/?ref_noscript=greatergood">comments powered by Disqus.</a>  

      Share this with LS 121 class.

    1. It's hard to think of anything we do nowadays, from working on projects for work or school to socializing with friends, that is not somehow mediated through digital technologies. It's not just that we're doing 'old things' in 'new ways'

      Communication has changed greatly. This came up recently with my fiance's grandmother who is using an iPad to communicate with Facetime while she is in a nursing home and they are locked down. This is a game changer for her, but the adition of video chatting and group chatting has changed her perception of communication, which was dropping by someones house or calling a landline when she wanted to talk to someone.

      Obviously, this has implications for students as well, as presentations and communication with classmates has been enhanced since I was in school.

    2. Other than making possible different kinds of social arrangements for participants, media also have an effect on two very important aspects of relationships: power and dis-tance. Technologies can make some people more powerful than others or they can erase power differences between people. For example, if I have a microphone and you don't, then I have power to make my voice heard than you do. Similarly, if I have the ability to pub-lish my views and you don't, then I have greater power to get my opinions noticed than you do. One way the internet has changed the power relations among people is to give every-one the power to publish their ideas and disseminate them to millions of people. This is not to say that the internet has made everyone's ideas equal. It's just that more people have the opportunity to get their ideas noticed.

      I was intrigued by this use of "power and distance." My immediate thought was that often technology can allow people to feel more powerful because of their distance. I think people are more bold to criticize others and to publish their opinions without thought of offense to others. People are living in this time when they can have an opinion on anything because they "lived it" on the media... back to the previous portion on meaning... Most happenings are available to us in "real time." This allows people to feel entitled to have an opinion or an opinion anyone would care about! I want to challenge myself to look for examples in media, which "erases power differences between people." I think we are seeing more of that then ever given recent events...

    1. He envies the comradery of Hrothgar’s men, their closeness as a tribe

      It’s sad. Grendel just wants company or friends that he can be close with as well.

    1. With the institution of the Lex Julia, the pater familias’s patria potestas was reduced (although it may not appear so) and transferred to the courts. However, under the new laws, the father was allowed to kill his daughter and her lover under very specific circumstances, whereas the court punished adulterers primarily by relegation to various remote island combined with some loss of property[4]. The complete Lex Julia no longer remains, but sections as well as case law reference the Lex were recorded in the Justinian Digest, a very large 6th century compilation of different parts of Roman law. These are excerpts of the digest that refer specifically to a section of the Lex Julia that primarily focuses on who her family can kill the female adulterer and under what circumstances. The husband was not permitted to kill his wife because it was feared that husbands would murder their wives, claim adultery, and try to take her dowry. It was thought that a father would make a sounder decision, because he would be influenced by his love for his daughter, and would therefore only kill her if it was absolutely necessary.

      This looks like it's in block quote, just un-block quote it so that it's not indented like the ancient sources

    1. Academic peer review of scientific manuscripts often falls short. It invariably slows and sometimes prevents the publication of good research. And it sometimes leads to the distribution and amplification of flawed research. Prestigious journals sometimes publish research grounded on shaking theory that used weak measures and inappropriate analyses to reach dubious conclusions. Failings of peer review play a principal role in those problems. Journal editors typically perform journal tasks off the side of their desks, on top of everything else. They may handle manuscripts outside of their expertise. Sometimes it’s difficult for them to know who to ask to review. When they do identify prospective reviewers, many decline the request or don’t reply. When I was Editor of Psych Science, I often sent 6 or more invitations to get 2 acceptances. Thus, it sometimes takes weeks to get a few people to commit to reviewing. Some of those fail to deliver on time or at all, despite multiple prompts (doubtless sometimes for good reasons – one never knows what’s going on in another person’s life). So even under the best conditions, peer review takes a long time. And rarely is the decision to accept as is. Good news for authors is a reject/revise/resubmit decision. Thus, it typically takes many months between initial submission and eventual acceptance. The other day I saw an email about a manuscript submitted to Psych Science in January that had just been accepted. I thought, “Wow! Quick!” Is that time well spent? I believe that generally it is. Many reviewers provide assessments that are detailed, clear, insightful, well-informed, and constructive. Many editors strive to understand the work well enough to fairly assess the manuscript and, if it has potential for their journal, making the manuscript as good as it can be. As an author/co-author I have many times been furious with editors and/or reviewers (indeed, even now it takes me days to steel myself to read an action letter), but very often editors’ and reviewers’ input has (I believe) led to major improvements.
    1. Orientalism, therefore, is not an airy European fantasy about the Orient but a created body of theoryand practice in which, for many rations, there has been a considerable material investment. Continued investment made Orientalism, as a system of knowledge about the Orient, an accepted grid for filtering through the Orient into Western consciousness, just as that same investment multiplied-indeed, made truly productive-the statements proliferating out from Orientalism into the general culture.

      The words "material investment" really resonate here because it's not just imagined, but a "theory and practice"...images/stories/narratives are produced

    1. It’s not because I’m lazy or that I don’t care if my kids have a good party. I am just not wired in such a way that I can fashion sandwiches, made on my very own homemade, organic, gluten-free, sugar-free bread, into holiday-themed shapes. Nor can I make centerpieces that are totally precious using nothing but dental floss and a milk carton. And I’m perfectly fine with that, even though it’s taken me a long time to get here.

      This speaks volumes, and I'm sure lots of moms feel this way.

    1. I'm involved in a fair amount of management stuff for the firm but it's stuff that we cover in our internal meetings.

      But key difference = no direct contact with the people, just high-level stuff

    1. Do you know how to do an undo on an iPhone? Let me ask you that question. I’ll just test you out a little. Suppose you do something on the iPhone and you don’t like it, how do you undo it?FC: Unless you’re within an application, then … I don’t know.AK: So, in theory, you’re supposed to shake the iPhone and that means undo. Did you ever, did anybody ever tell you that? It’s not on the website. It turns out almost no app responds to a shake. And there’s no other provision. In fact, you can’t even find out how to use the iPhone on the iPhone. You ever notice that?

      Absolutely. Absolutely stupid.

    1. rees below

      this is not working in ipfs.

      Really trying to work with this thing; it's "much slower' than I had anticipated. I read it might work with CloudFlare or something like that, and might try to ... finagle something there. I do realise none of you give a shit if my "stuff" is here post ad mortem; but it's important that these things we are building aren't just complete trash.

      It does appear to be "serving" what it's supposed to at this point--though of course it's probably doing it off my "one server" which is actually many servers in many places under the control of nobody--so that's how "I do things."

      To whit; I seem to get "communidity standards violations" whenever I try to post "my stuff" on Facebook now--through proxies like "google translate" as in, you can't see anybody sharing it or talking about it--because it's simply not possible.

      I'm not even sure you can see "thsi stuff" it would be cool if you'd "syn/ack" and let me know ... if you can. It's not just about "my words" this is about "all words" and "all uncensorship" and all of the stuff we were supposed to attribute to something like Voltaire--though apparently it's just more "esh."

      https://ipfs.io/ipns/QmZf31nnW8C7zKZPZGpoPuRx2UduPse97APBr1VZd6tcEr/atlaz.ne.oriole.hunta/MIYAHSOREY.html

    1. It’s not about learning all the tools, but about being mindful of how to use which tool for the right purpose at the right time, and knowing when NOT to use the more complicated technology and instead just sending an email or making a phone call.

      Many teachers, especially K-12, in this quick shift to digital learning caused by the pandemic, minimized the importance of engagement tools, tools that foster learning and tech tools and apps that can do both. As adults, distance work can be appealing to us because it is convenient, potentially saving us time; but for children, distance learning can become a source of isolation. I have encountered several colleagues who "forgot" how many students, high school students no less, may thrive in environments where learning is social.

    1. Today, we’re going to use a lot of data and charts to answer these questions:What is happening in Sweden?How bad is the virus, really? How many people does it infect? Hurt? Kill?Who does it affect? Can we just protect the weak?What’s best for the economy?Here’s what you’re going to learn:Sweden is suffering tremendously in cases and deaths. Yet few people have been infected yet. They are a long way from Herd Immunity.Between 0.5% to 1.5% of infected die from the coronavirus.Left uncontrolled, it can kill between 0.4% and 1% of the entire population.Many more suffer conditions we don’t yet understand.Unfortunately, that death and sickness toll is far from having bought us Herd Immunity anywhere in the world.Only protecting those most at risk sounds great. It’s a fantasy today.Even if Sweden’s economy has remained mostly open, it has still suffered as much as others.From now on, it might start doing worse.Sweden now has regrets. But not enough. It can control the virus without a lockdown if it acknowledges its mistakes and takes the right measures.Other countries, like the US or the Netherlands, are toying with a Herd Immunity strategy. It will only cause more economic loss and death.
    1. Over the next few months, you are going to see many different predictions about COVID-19 outcomes. They won’t all agree. But just because they’re based on assumptions doesn’t mean they’re worthless. “All models are wrong, it’s striving to make them less wrong and useful in the moment,” Weir said. We’re hungry, so somebody has to do some baking. But be sure to ask what ingredients went into that pie and in what quantities.
    1. Post Affiliate programs here

      Hey everyone, I'm here to talk about the Affiliate Institute, and educational organization designed around learning the skills used in affiliate marketing.

      What it is

      There are a lot of amazing affiliate offers out there, as many of you know, but a product can be amazing and still not lead to a successful business when we don't know how to put it in front of the right people. That's where the Affiliate Institute comes in.

      We do have recommendations of products for people who don't already have one in mind, but they are not required. Fundamentally we are an education platform. Topics like general business, finance, followup, organic traffic, content, and more that's in just the first tier of a 4 tier system.

      The first tier is everything you need to begin earning, and the additional tiers focus on optimization, scaling, and deep diving into particular skillsets.

      The education is generic and can be applied to any product including one you made in your own garage, or if you are working for a company, their product. I've applied what I've learned to job recruitment for a local company as well as my own freelance marketing.

      There are thousands of people using it and someone is always available to help with any issues through community support, or if its

      The company website is http://www.affiliateinstitute.com

      And the registration link for getting started is http://learn.affiliateinstitute.fyi (disclosure: this is also an affiliate link tied to me)

      The company has assisted previously unskilled people in generating over $28,000,000 in with their chosen products for their members in the last three years since they started teaching, (this number is undoubtedly higher, as the last time I looked up the information was about a year ago)

      Cost and value

      The program is only $99 a month and in addition to the curriculum they have 3 company scheduled meetings weekly generally usually scheduled for an hour in length but they generally do exceed that time. There are also frequently meetings held by other members sharing their knowledge with the community. As you no doubt could tell by the link above, they do have their own affiliate program (also completely optional).

      I have been a member of their affiliate program since I joined since I share their vision of helping people design their own life in a way that's valuable to them individually.

      I chose two of their recommended offers in addition to about 4 or 5 others I decided to promote myself, the offers I chose I won't get into here because what's right for me may not be right for you, however it's commissions starts in the hundreds of dollars and goes up from there.

      As for the Affiliate Institute affiliate program as an affiliate you would get a little less than 1/3rd the membership fees as commission for every month a referral is an active member. making your ongoing education free.

      There are more details available on the company and signup web pages.

      If you have any questions I'd be glad to answer them. The tricky part is I don't check reddit all that often, so I'll either reply instantly or it may take me a few days to get back to you, I am available on Facebook as well which I do keep an active eye on, and you can reach me here: https://business.facebook.com/mikehollisjr

      I did just see that "coaching guru programs" are automatically considered spam, however I'm not sure if this qualifies by your definition.

      For now I'll leave it here, and if it's against your rules, do what you feel is appropriate its your landscape and your rules and I respect that.

      Have an amazing day :)

    1. nd, as you just mentioned, COVID-19 is going to exacerbate exponentially the amount of suicide and overdose.

      Another trend that I have seen (after talking with a few psychiatrists) is that people are being prescribed anti anxiety and anti-depression pills- many of whom havent been on any medications until COVID. This I believe also exacerbates the overdose and suicide rates. We have more people who aren't used to the side effects that come with meds such as SSRIs that can increase suicidal tendencies, and people can't see their doctors in person anymore so it's likely these symptoms can slip under the radar for someone who needs to know them.

  5. learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet01-xythos.s3.amazonaws.com learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet01-xythos.s3.amazonaws.com
    1. Looking back, I can now see that I didn't wish to be Margaret or Katherine because I was Margaret and Katherine. But I like to think that Hermione and my illusory Hardy sister were reading Are You There God? It's Me, Margaret just as I was. Even if you are having amazing adventures, you still had to figure out how to navigate your period.

      I thought this was an interesting and relatable statement that many children who come of age encounter. Many of us, while we read these books idolize and seek to be these characters, but only looking back on these stories, do we realize that these bd characters are written on our point of view. These characters, whether we realize it or not, struggle just as we do, and these characters empower us through their triumph over their obstacles.

    1. Children have a right to good stuff thatmakes them happy

      I believe in this completely. Yes, children should have the right to things that make them happy. I know all our thoughts head to "toy" but that just isn't always it. Happiness stems from so many different subjects. Just being with family, friends, having a healthy life and positive thoughts. Every child deserves to be happy. And it's the adults job to make that happen. Something many adults forget.

    1. "And then I can use her more in the house," I heard my mother say. She had a dead-quiet regretful way of talking about me that always made me uneasy. "I just get my back turned and she runs off. It's not like I had a girl in the family at all."

      As she grows up, she is expected to become more involved with "women's chores" and break away from men's.

    2. "And then I can use her more in the house," I heard my mother say. She had a dead-quiet regretful way of talking about me that always made me uneasy. "I just get my back turned and she runs off. It's not like I had a girl in the family at all."

      Roles socially attached to boys and girls.

    1. One thing that instantly annoyed me about Messenger Kids is that there are so many distractions from the core features of messaging and video calls. There are filters, stickers, and mini games (like spinning to choose a llama head during a video chat… go figure… kids love it!). My 6 year old is SO drawn to these features as are her friends. So far, this is their main interest during video calls. They don’t talk very much. They just play. Initially, I kept prompting in the background, “ask them what they’ve been doing”, “stop playing with the effects and talk!” Then I took a step back and thought, this is what they want to do. This is play. They’re only 6/7 and if they were playing together in the same room, they probably wouldn’t be sitting chatting about what they’ve been up to. They’d probably be playing in a way that’s sometimes hard for adults to understand. So my way of thinking now is that it’s okay. Maybe the novelty won’t last. However, when my daughter is talking to her grandparents, for example, I’m insisting that she talks rather than simply playing with the effects. It’s about changing your interactions to suit who you are communicating with; a vital lesson for both online and offline encounters.

      I really liked your point Kathleen about play and how students interact online.

    1. Looking back 25 years starts in 1994, when the web was just about to garner mainstream attention.

      The history misses a big chunk that was present at the place I started by edtech career (1992), maybe because it was at a community college. I entered on the tailing end of a long, rarely mention systemic approach to technology, going back to mainframe systems for automation and synchronizing in the mid 1980s, to starting faculty computer literacy projects in the late 1980s.

      An early project I did in that 1994 year was putting online a backward and forward looking collaborative report on the system's efforts, "It's a River, Not a Lake" - the original site gone but in the wayback and my own archives Description.

      There's a lot more history buried than in books.

    1. To me this suggests that, after students are praised for their intelligence, it's too humiliating for them to admit mistakes. 

      It is sad to see that children who's intelligence was praised let failure strike such a harsh and resonant chord on the strings of their hearts. This shows how if we believe just ever so slightly one way then have our beliefs challenged it could be detrimental to the ground upon which our minds and egos stand. this is not good for it could really disrupt how people believe in themselves if at all after tough times.

    1. Let’s be blunt. A huge chunk of the UK government’s coronavirus strategy has never seemed to make any sense. There just hasn’t seemed to be a whole lot of logic to it. In many instances contradictions have appeared obvious. And try as we might, there have been some things we’ve never quite been able to rationalise. But here at FT Alphaville we are firm believers in the concept of Chesterton’s fence. This is the principle conjured up by social commentator and philosopher G.K. Chesterton, which says that before critiquing a certain piece of regulation or arguing for its removal, it’s important to understand why the rule was instated in the first place.
    1. it's simply what you do so you can improve and learn more.

      Or, maybe it's just an acknowledgement that nothing is ever really finished - everything is just "good enough" for whatever purpose one has in mind. In this case, display or 'throw away' assignments have very low value, while an assignment that has some other purpose "In the world" may have a high enough value to continue to develop: a blog post, for instance, or a poster, photograph, piece of art etc.

  6. May 2020
  7. docserv.uni-duesseldorf.de docserv.uni-duesseldorf.de
    1. "Just say I looked pretty well and was having a good time.""I'll say the first with all my heart, but how about the other? You don't look as if you were having a good time. Are you?' And Laurie looked at her with an expression which made her answer in a whisper...

      It is important, that it is Laurie who addresses Meg's behaviour, because Laurie is familiar with 'vanity fair'. And, because he is familiar with it, he knows of it's phoniness, and because he knows Meg, he has to tell her, that it is not her true nature, to be spoiled and superficial. In this very moment, Laurie was the right choice to remind Meg of who she truly is.

    1. Reasons You Might Want to change your job! Leave a Comment / Blog Contact If you’re planning on leaving or changing your current job, this blog is going to help you in a certain way. Given what’s going on right now, some of you might be saying that the last thing you’re thinking about is changing jobs. I totally understand. But there are companies hiring today. And they’re looking for the best talent. So, deciding whether to change or leave your job remains a very personal decision. There are three things that I would suggest to someone who’s trying to make the decision about changing jobs. I can’t answer these questions, but I do think the answers will help someone figure it out for themselves. Your job is impacting your health. First and foremost, if your job is making you physically or emotionally sick, you need to step back and think. There are jobs where risks do exist, and individuals take those roles knowing that. Jobs in health care, construction, etc. come to mind. Individuals in these industries are taking as many preventive measures as they can. Your work doesn’t make you happy anymore. This could be one of two things: 1) You love what you do but you don’t love the company (or your boss) anymore. OR 2) You’ve fallen out of love with the work. Maybe you used to love traveling as part of your job and now, not so much. It’s important to understand which one you’re dealing with. (NOTE: It’s also possible that the answer is both #1 and #2.) Your career doesn’t make financial sense. I don’t want to simply say that the job doesn’t pay enough. Because maybe the pay is fine. It’s possible that the benefits package doesn’t suit your current situation. Or the cost of maintaining your professional license is getting expensive and the company isn’t reimbursing. The question is “Does your current position adequately cover your living situation?” Once you honestly and seriously answer the above questions, it might help you decide if you want to make a change AND more importantly, what you might want to make a change to. There is some truth to the saying that the best time to look for a new job is when you have a job. I realize not everyone gets that opportunity which is why it can make some sense to always be thinking about your job wants and needs. If you’re thinking about a new opportunity, I want to give you something else to consider. Now is the time to start planning. Don’t wait until you have to make a move to start planning for it. Here are three action steps that will help you find your next job. Also, there are some other important questions that you might want to ask yourself before taking the big step : What specifically about my current situation is frustrating to me? Pinpointing the issue is the first step towards solving it. Kimberly Bishop, recruiter and chief of her eponymous career management firm based in New York, advises employees to identify how their job is failing them. Is the problem the people, the environment or the work itself? After you’ve defined the frustration, consider the scope. If you decide you’re creatively stifled, for example, you may not need to quit to fill the void. Seek an outlet outside of work or raise your hand for another department or project. Have I taken every action possible to make my current job workable? If you realize your situation is not abusive and could be manageable, consider the steps you might take to improve it. Try taking a positive attitude, altering your time management or work habits, and communicating more clearly with your manager. Perhaps a schedule change or clearing an item off your workload will make a big difference. Ultimately, what do I want for my job, career, and life? “A big mistake: When people decide to quit they think they’ll just update their resume and start networking,” says Bishop, who advises being more thoughtful about what you really want and how you’ll get there. Define your priorities. Going to law school may be intellectually stimulating but will not help you achieve the flexible schedule you’ve been craving. Similarly, if you’d like to make a career change, think about all the necessary steps. They may include more school, a pay cut, or working your way up from the bottom–again. Once you know exactly what you want, you may want to ask: How much do I want it? Have I saved enough to cover nine to 12 months of expenses? Susan Hirshman, financial planner and author of Does This Make My Assets Look Fat?, says a few years ago she told people to save enough for six months of expenses. Now she tells people they need nine to 12 months. “If you’re quitting, you won’t get unemployment,” she cautions. Hirshman suggests mapping out fixed expenses like mortgage, credit card, and loan payments, transportation, and food, as well as factoring in the “what if” costs. You may need a little extra to cushion against the unexpected, like car or appliance repairs. How might I cut expenses or earn income while between jobs? After completing a detailed budget, you may realize you’re coming up short and need to create some cash. Often, income is easily supplanted with a part-time service job. However, Hirshman warns that even waiter jobs are difficult to come by in the current economy. You only have two options: Cut expenses or bring in more money. Figure out what will work for you and be honest with yourself, Hirshman says. Have I timed this appropriately? Agryie suggests that employees who’ve decided to quit consider their timing. Firstly, are you in the midst of the busiest season or working on a big project? You may want to honor your commitments so that your team isn’t left in a bind and you’re able to leave on good terms. Secondly, “maximize the money,” he says. If you’d like to get your quarterly bonus or the holiday vacation, it might be smart to wait a few months. So after answering all these questions for yourself, you’d be able to decide if you’d want to continue with your old job or career or switch to a new one.Put together a job search plan. Grab a notebook and start plotting your strategy. Think about your skills. Make note of the knowledge and skills you want to work on before starting to interview. List your must-haves and nice-to-haves for your next company and job. Start thinking about your professional network, both online and the one on one type. Identify the resources you need. It’s possible that you would benefit from taking a class, joining a professional group, or reading some books. Make a list of everything you need and roughly how much it will cost. Start budgeting for these items. Also, think about if you will be out of work for a while and if you will need to cover health insurance in-between jobs. That needs to be budgeted as well. Ask for support. Once you have a plan, reach out to your network. Start reconnecting with them. If you’ve been doing that all along – fantastic! If you haven’t, it will take some time before you can ask for favors. Also, be sure to speak with your family and make sure they’re prepared to support you through this transition. Changing jobs will impact them too. Regardless of where you are in your career and what’s going on in the economy, the job search process is hard. It takes time. The best suggestions I can give someone is to think about why you’re considering a change and create a plan to get from where you are to where you see yourself. The worst thing someone can do is react too quickly and find themselves in another toxic workplace. I know that the current work situation is tough but remember it’s tough you know. Have a plan and work the plan out. You’ll definitely succeed. All the best!

      A job change is a big decision and requires a good consideration. We are here to give reasons why you might want to change the job.

  8. pressbooks.bccampus.ca pressbooks.bccampus.ca
    1. Arbiter, Petronius, and Sarah Ruden. 2000. satyricon. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co.

      Overall I think this is a very womderful chapter! It's obvious that it is a topic close to your heart, and that shines through in the excellent research, attention and care that went into cultivating it. I learned so much just from editing it for you.

    1. it would be better for him that he had a brother, both of one father,

      It's best to have companionship and not live alone. It is preferable to have a blood-related "brother" from the same father than to be a single child or to be without friends and company.

      I found this to be amusing that no requirement is mentioned for having a sister, or that both children be of the same mother- so it sounds as if it is ok for a man to sleep around with multiple women but not so for women to sleep around with multiple men. So it's not better to have just any sibling- a sister just won't do. A good man should have a brother and with the same father, but who cares if they have different mothers.

    2. A man is pledge-free and imprudent, malicious and faithless, who does not care for God.

      I mean, it's pretty obvious that a "man who does not care for god" would be faithless, so that goes without saying. But here the author also claims that without faith to guide them, a man will be "malicious" and aimless. Perhaps back in these early days when religion was the driving force behind keeping societies alive and fearing divine consequences kept people from wanting to do dumb and dangerous things that would lead to the fall of their societies, it would make more sense to consider someone who ignored those societal norms and expectations as dangerous and a risk to others. But realistically, especially in today's perspective when religion is more a choice than a requirement and education has taught us better than to do the dumb and dangerous things we would have done before, a "faithless man" is just as dangerous or safe as any religious man. This line serves as a reminder to the audience of that time period to be obedient and god-fearing if they want to avoid damnation.

    3. Treasure becomes others— a man must give out gold. God can grant blessed possessions and also take them back.

      Material possessions never belong to someone for eternity. "Treasure becomes others-" means that goods are passed on and repossessed. Here the author claims that men must be charitable as wealth can come and go at any time by the will of god, meaning that it's ill-advised to get caught up in greed because you could easily lose it just as quick as it is obtained, so it's better to be generous and giving with it than to fixate on it and risk losing it all anyways.

    1. Efficient operations. Fast food franchises benefit from consistent delivery of both food and experience - look for franchise opportunities with a proven and cost effective system. Effective marketing. As a franchisee you don’t have to handle the marketing - but you sure want to make sure the mother ship knows what they’re doing. With so many options to choose from it’s important that a franchise can effectively market their unique value proposition. Innovative menus. Menu options need to be creative and offer both healthy and indulgent options. New plays on old favorites, healthier versions of classics, or unique flavor profiles like a spicy dessert are just a few examples. Know Your Niche. There is something to be said for the traditional burger joint - some would say don’t fix what isn’t broken - but increasingly specialty or regional food options are gaining in popularity. Figure out what will work in your community. Effective use of technology. Many franchises are using the same exact model of limited service that launched in the 50's. Restaurants with kiosk or automated table ordering help keep costs down. Look for an iPad.

      What does it take to build a successful QSR?

    1. I love the statement: Youthful dedication abounds - just not necessarily in the classroom. It's amazing to me that some children come to kindergarten and this statement describes them perfectly. The challenge of engaging students is at every grade level and relevance is so key...

    1. “Can you imagine the kind of cold calls we had to make in the beginning?” says Warinner. “‘Hi, I’m working with this thing on teeth, and it’s about 1,000 years old, and it has blue stuff in it. Can you help me?’ People thought we were crazy. We tried reaching out to physicists, and they were like, ‘I don’t know what you’re talking about.’ We tried reaching out to people working in art restoration, and they were like, ‘Why are you working with plaque?’” She eventually reached physicists at the University of York who helped confirm the blue did indeed come from the mineral lazurite, derived from lapis lazuli.

      Why were some of the people that they were asking not interested in the discovery? Were they unaware of the significance that they were aware of? It is interesting to me that they got these kinds of reactions, especially since their findings are quite interesting. Not to mention that there were at least some physicists that got it, as mentioned at the end of the paragraph. Why did others think they were crazy? Did the University of York physicists just have higher interest, or more knowledge about the importance of this discovery?

    1. Figure 4.2: Bias, Coverage and Empirical Standard Error for the Over-estimating, Perfect and Under-Estimating models across all four methods when β=1β=1\beta=1, γ=1γ=1\gamma=1 and η=1/2η=1/2\eta=\;^{1}/_{2}. Confidence Intervals are included in the plot, but are tight around the estimate

      Would it be possible to blow up the bias graph from this scenario for the 'perfect model'. Given the motivating examples (i.e. QRISK) I was expecting to see the KM to be biased in this situtation, but it appears not to be?

      What correlation between the censoring and survival times does beta = gamma = 1 induce? Maybe it needs to be stronger?

      Another reason could be to due with the scale on the y-axis. It's on the probability scale currently if i'm not mistaken? This means that a bias of 0.02 (which would not really be observable on that graph), corresponds to a 2% over prediction in the calibration in the large, which is quite a large bias.

      Just hypothesising.

    1. direction of causality here – it’s not likely that self esteem causes your height!

      We'll be talking about this a lot more when we explore the difference between correlation and causation.

      The main point here is: just because two variables are correlated, doesn't mean that one variable causes the other.

    1. It's as simple as night and day; Heaven and Hell ... the difference between survival and--what we are presented with here; it's "doing this." It's ending the ELE of "representative democracy" and "electoral college" and giant screaming grande message about "extinction level event" .... is literally just as simple as "not caring" or thinking we are at the beginning of some long process--or thinking it will never be done--that special "IT" that's the emancipation of you and I.

      It's as simple as night and day; Heaven and Hell ... the difference between survival and--what we are presented with here; it's "doing this right"--that ends the Hell of representative democracy and electoral college--the blindness and darkness of not seeing "EXTINCTION LEVEL EVENT" encoded in these words and in our governments foundation ... by the framers [not just of the USA; but English .. and every language]

    1. Don’t go to code academy, go to design academy. Be advocates of the user & consumer. It’s not about learning how to code, it’s about translating real-world needs to technological specifications in just ways that give end users agency and equity in design, development and delivery. Be a champion of user-centric design. Learn how to steward data and offer your help.

      The importance of learning to design, and interpreting/translating real-world needs.

    1. Faulkner Press' attorney, says the suit isn't about money for the professors, it's about protecting its intellectual property

      It's interesting that in terms of intellectual property, professors stand to gain more coverage through the popularity of the notes, and ultimately additional associated economic benefits due to the publicity. However, it may really be just about the money, and the competition between publishers, the old monopolies.

    1. On top of this, the conspiracy theorists who contend that original composer Junkie XL has a full, finished alternate Justice League score ready to replace the work of Danny Elfman just simply don't have a leg to stand on.

      This is one part that may NOT be true, since it's possible that Junkie XL was replaced by Danny Elfman after completing a substantial amount of work on Justice League.

    1. The world is wrong. You can’t put the past behind you. It’s buried in you; it’s turned your flesh into its own cupboard. Not everything remembered is useful but it all comes from the world to be stored in you. Who did what to whom on which day? Who said that? She said what? What did he just do? Did she really just say that? He said what? What did she do? Did I hear what I think I heard? Did that just come out of my mouth, his mouth, your mouth? Do you remember when you sighed?

    1. Over the weekend, The Washington Post published a chilling description of the first day of reopened business at a mall in an upscale suburb of Atlanta, Georgia. Bored rich people wandered the aisles of Anthropologie and Crate & Barrel, pawing at the wares, some with no masks or hand sanitizer in sight. One woman getting a manicure said, “I went to the antique mall yesterday on Highway 9 and it was just like—it was like freedom. We have to get out.” Everyone who is lucky enough not to have to work is chafing at being stuck at home, but one has to laugh at the idea that American Freedom is visiting the antique mall on Highway 9. Then again, maybe she’s right: Maybe that is American Freedom. The right to visit whatever business you please is not one enshrined in the Constitution. There is no constitutional right to go to Arby’s. But from the start, lockdown protesters claimed their constitutional rights were being trampled by the stay-at-home orders. Protest signs in Southern California read: “Pandemics does [sic] NOT cancel our Constitutional rights!! Freedom over fear,” and “No Liberty, No Life, Reopen California.” My colleague Matt Ford is not the only one suggesting tweaks to America’s foundational documents, it seems: The angry bourgeoisie of the “reopen America” movement has invented an entirely new category of civil rights. On Monday, in New Jersey, a protester at a gym that opened despite the shutdown order held a sign that said, “The constitution is essential,” and another held a sign that said, “Right to work/Right to worship/Right to free speech/Right to be free.” A protester in Washington said: “I lost my job as a bartender and now I live on way less income, and I’m upset that my constitutional rights are being trampled all over.” Advocates of a federal job guarantee will be thrilled to hear that there is a constitutional right to a job. This line of criticism might make a little more sense if the issue in question was the federal government enforcing a broad order to physically keep residents inside their homes. But there are no patrols of soldiers forcing citizens to remain indoors, certainly not among the white and wealthy. Take Newport Beach, California, for example: The city said on April 3 that it would not enforce Governor Gavin Newsom’s stay-at-home order, saying the governor “expects Californians to do the right thing” and “self-regulate.” Californians can still go to the grocery store, the pharmacy, the laundromat. They can still shop online. They can still go for walks. They can even go to Arby’s—drive-thru, at least. But the people who took their AR-15s to Subway, citing their “God-given freedoms as Americans,” are not talking about their actual constitutional rights. They are talking about their unique understanding of the mythical promise of this nation, which is a place where a man can drive a big-ass truck, drink a 64 oz Slurpee, and go to the air-conditioned mall to purchase Stuff. Because this is America, and if that’s what America is, that’s what the Constitution must necessarily be protecting. Children are educated in our schools that the Constitution defends the American “way of life.” It’s not that surprising if the end result is that people think this is actually true. In this case, they rage at being prevented from living their normal lives—going to Bed Bath & Beyond, drinking margaritas at Chili’s with friends, golfing—because they consider the conduct of their normal lives to be inseparable from the purpose of America. The right of essential workers not to die of the coronavirus does not seem to enter the equation. White dudes who own big pickup trucks and live in Newport Beach have rarely been at risk of overaggressive policing. The fact remains that even if a mandatory quarantine were harshly enforced by the government, all the available evidence suggests that the white people who feel threatened enough by government overreach to parade around state capitols with guns are not the ones who would be at risk of violence from the police. New York City data revealed earlier this month that 35 of the 40 people arrested for social distancing violations were black, four were Hispanic, and only one was white. White dudes who own big pickup trucks and live in Newport Beach have rarely been at risk of overaggressive policing. This is simply the conservative mentality: a constant state of perceived victimhood. The notion that oppressed groups enjoy being persecuted, because it lets them complain about victimization, becomes a weird sort of envy. This leads the would-be wretches to invent forms of oppression, like having to buy two iced teas instead of getting a free refill, so they get to have a turn at complaining. They may genuinely not realize that actually oppressed groups are not having fun when they object to their situation. The conservative-fear-industrial complex runs on conjuring ever-changing enemies of liberty, each browner and more Marxist than the last, because it makes them feel alive. Hence the outrage directed at Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for noting that we will need to consume less beef if we want to prevent apocalyptic climate change, which was in turn reminiscent of the anger at Michelle Obama for proposing that children should be given healthy food at school instead of pizza and white bread. How dare you, government bureaucrat, suggest that I shouldn’t kill myself with a diet of only red meat and Mr. Pibb? Never mind the millions for whom a diet of processed food and soda is all that’s affordable or available; the real oppression is you criticizing the choices I use to define myself, which, for some reason, now include eating burgers. For anyone, particularly nonwhite women, to suggest otherwise is essentially the new Gestapo. There is no logical connection between your constitutional rights and shopping at businesses you like. But it makes the desire for normality, which we all crave, much more defensible if you frame it as being a martyr for American liberty in the vein of Thomas Jefferson, and not a sad admission that the America of sterile malls, connected by vast freeways and staffed by the underpaid masses, is what you would actually die for.

      Obviously written by someone who looks down on people that either have different values or beliefs from her. She has never been to Newport Beach because there are very few big pickup trucks in Newport Beach - more electric cars).

    1. Directly opposite him, on the other side of the inclosed space, were two doors, exactly alike and side by side. It was the duty and the privilege of the person on trial to walk directly to these doors and open one of them.

      This is showing that when you go to trial you have two chose between two doors, one is a very sevire punishment, the other isn't something as bad but it's forceful. This way of trial is just giving people a 50/50 chance of survival and it is all based on luck

    1. Students are seldom given choicesregarding academic tasks to pursue, methods forcarrying out complex assignments, or study part-ners. Few teachers encourage students to establishspecific goals for their academic work or teachexplicit study strategies. Also, students are rarelyasked to self-evaluate their work or estimate theircompetence on new tasks. Teachers seldom assessstudents’ beliefs about learning, such as self-effi-cacy perceptions or causal attributions, in order toidentify cognitive or motivational difficulties be-fore they become problematic.

      Guilty. I'm also sympathetic to the criticism that self-regulatory learning is for kids with a lot stability. But as a skill set to be exported out of the classroom, perhaps self-evaluation is one of the more valuable things we can teach students to do. I keep returning to the Gloria Ladson-Billings interview. She claimed that students who quit, end up quitting a lot. They get overwhelmed and quit. It's not necessarily a lack of grit, but an inability to set goals and follow through with them. Even for students who struggle with poverty and abuse at home, this self-evaluation could be useful, practical even - and not just a higher order critical thinking skill outside of their awareness capabilities. But the rub is still how to teach these kids who struggle so profoundly.

    1. “Mister John Adams,” Will said, realizing his mistake.“That’s more like it,” Sam smiled. “Now, why do you want to vote?”

      It's very sad how Will is being verbally attacked by these people when he is just trying to register himself. He means no harm but he still receives it. its insane how he is unable to talk casually and has to talk the way that these people want him to because of race.

    1. Thank you for your work in this class. I know it’s a lot to manage. Just a reminder, make sure you’re taking all the quizzes to help you be successful here. Please contact me if I can help or answer any questions. Thanks!”

      I think this requires that we assume the best about our students.

    1. Recovering heroin addicts in Edinburgh who need to self-isolate are now receiving home deliveries of methadone, as experts call for further creative thinking to save lives. With Scotland’s drug deaths rate expected to have risen even higher when annual figures are published this summer, there have been warnings of another public health emergency on top of the coronavirus pandemic, as addicts abandon their substitute treatment prescriptions because of lengthy pharmacy queues, become estranged from support services, and risk overdose by turning to more dangerous alternatives when street supplies of heroin disrupted. The Guardian spent time on the Edinburgh delivery run with two managers from the recovery charity Change Grow Live. After picking up chemist prescriptions, Rab Dylan and Lukas Waclawski then drop off the bags of opiate substitute – usually methadone – clean needles, or kits of the life-saving overdose reversal drug naloxone at the doorstep. Some visits are daily, in particular where an individual is deemed an overdose risk or in need of regular supervision, while others are every few days in an attempt to ease pressure on services. One homeless couple have been housed four miles away from their regular pharmacy, to the north of the city. Dylan and Waclawski meet them in the car park of their bed and breakfast for a contactless delivery, wearing gloves and masks. As a salty breeze blows in from the Firth of Forth, Waclawski demonstrates the use of the pre-filled naloxone syringe while maintaining strict physical distancing. “You can inject it through your clothes,” he advises, “into the largest muscle, which is usually the thigh.” Karen (not her real name), who has been in treatment since January, says the deliveries have been “so helpful” since she and her partner were instructed to self-isolate after developing coronavirus symptoms. “Before we had to go to the chemist every day and I was paranoid, because people in the queue were coughing and sneezing, not covering their mouths.” “The guys are just happy to have someone to check in with,” adds Dylan. “Given that a lot of services are moving away from face to face, if we can get out there and get some interaction, it has got to be positive.” Lauren Gibson, the lead pharmacist for substance misuse and prisons at NHS Lothian, who is coordinating the delivery scheme, says: “Relationships with this patient group are so important and we had to find ways to keep that going. It’s not just about getting access to methadone and medications; it’s about the full recovery package, such as food parcels, naloxone and overdose support, welfare checks, mental health – it’s about keeping those vital relationships going with patients, even if that’s virtually or on doorsteps.” Last week the Scottish government’s drug deaths taskforce called for home delivery outreach networks to be rolled out across the country, and many local authorities have followed suit. The taskforce also urged ministers to treat drug users as a priority group for coronavirus testing, and floated the use of depot injections, like a once-a-month injection of slow-release heroin substitute, which the Welsh government has now made routinely available for recovering addicts. There is a wide consensus about the need for immediate access to substitute treatment, particularly with the expectation that more addicts will be seeking help as street supplies dwindle or become more dangerous or prohibitively expensive. But street workers report that in some areas desperate people are still waiting for more than a week for a prescription. They take the pragmatic view that some take-home methadone will inevitably end up back on the street, but that this must be balanced with the urgent need to make treatment as simple as possible. Tracey Clusker, a nurse manager for substance misuse at Midlothian health and social care partnership, is blunt: “We have to think creatively to save lives. If there’s any time people need rapid access to a prescription, it is now.” Clusker has been delivering methadone, along with food parcels, condoms and sanitary towels, to at-risk addicts who normally attend her innovative cafe clinic, and holding weekly Zoom groups where they can discuss how they are coping with isolation. Gibson and Clusker are hopeful that the pandemic may foster a shift in priorities both for those struggling with addiction and the public at large. Gibson says: “One positive in a negative time is that we are managing to engage people into treatment who wouldn’t consider it previously. We are working hard to keep treatment open and accessible for those vulnerable and struggling and we will work hard to ensure this continues post-Covid.” Clusker is cautiously optimistic. “Once this passes, will people understand this group better, will it reduce the stigma of addiction if the public are now viewing the world through a different lens?”

    1. It is very important to clearly define what a subscriptions means. First, it’s not a donation: it is asking a customer to pay money for a product. What, then, is the product? It is not, in fact, any one article (a point that is missed by the misguided focus on micro-transactions). Rather, a subscriber is paying for the regular delivery of well-defined value. The importance of this distinction stems directly from the economics involved: the marginal cost of any one Stratechery article is $0. After all, it is simply text on a screen, a few bits flipped in a costless arrangement. It makes about as much sense to sell those bit-flipping configurations as it does to sell, say, an MP3, costlessly copied. So you need to sell something different. In the case of MP3s, what the music industry finally learned — after years of kicking and screaming about how terribly unfair it was that people “stole” their music, which didn’t actually make sense because digital goods are non-rivalrous — is that they should sell convenience. If streaming music is free on a marginal cost basis, why not deliver all of the music to all of the customers for a monthly fee? This is the same idea behind nearly every large consumer-facing web service: Netflix, YouTube, Facebook, Google, etc. are all predicated on the idea that content is free to deliver, and consumers should have access to as much as possible. Of course how they monetize that convenience differs: Netflix has subscriptions, while Google, YouTube, and Facebook deliver ads (the latter two also leverage the fact that content is free to create). None of them, though, sell discrete digital goods. It just doesn’t make sense.
    1. There is a huge opportunity for URSSI to produce and disseminate a high quality newsletter to keep the community informed about research software news, notable research papers, critical software, events and job openings. The data science community already benefits from such a newsletter that is maintained by Laura Noren and Brad Stegner and financially supported by the Academic Data Science Alliance.

      Just a heads up that this isn't easy. Input to the DSCN comes from 25,000+ news and social media feeds weekly. We might be able to figure out a partner arrangement where URSSI has access to these feeds and can highlight more software specific items? But it's not free, so plan some budget for this.

    1. walked away unknown and forgotten into the ghostly daze of Chinatown soup alleyways & firetrucks, not even one free beer,

      The person survive unscathed? That's hard to believe, but the other part of a "ghostly daze of Chinatown" is possible. However, "ghostly daze"implies like being under a narcotic. Maybe after jumping off and surviving this is how it felt? In ghostly, I imagine walking with no purpose through the narrow empty streets of Chinatown, dazed out for sure-- at peace.

      The fact that the person does not get one free beer in the last part of these verses implies that the person who jumped off was broke, or just did not have money at the time. Notwithstanding that predicament, it's the person's need for empathy -- through a free beer-- that proves that the person that jumped off and survived is still controlled by forces outside theirselves. What would I do if I was eating at a ramen restaurant in Chinatown and was asked for a free beer, but first I needed to hear their story of jumping off the Brooklyn bridge and surviving before begging for the mercy of a beer?

    1. gradient

      General observation about gradient descent unrelated to this paper - if you look at the partial derivative of any particular parameter, it's got two components, which, slightly metaphorically, correspond to how strongly it was activated and how much influence it had over the error. This differs from my introspective feeling about how my own learning works, where the understanding I'm most sure of, the part of my model which is most strongly activated, is not the thing that changes the most. It introspectively (and so unreliably) feels like I'm more likely to try to spin up a patch for the error - take an under-activated part of the model, shift its outbound connections to try to better match the shape of the error, and crank up the weight going into it. Gradient descent sort of only punishes mistakes rather than rewarding growth (though maybe that sense is just a consequence of the arbitrary choice of sign: minimizing loss vs. maximizing its opposite).

      Basically, what if we looked for a highly activated cell that didn't affect the outcome much one way or another and see if we could make it affect the loss more and better? Once a cell gets a tiny weight going into it and tiny weights in its output stream, is there any hope for it to matter? How often does this sort of "self-pruning" zero-ing happen? Are these metaphors at all sensible?

    1. The hunting was not good last night. The fellow lost his head. He made a straight trail that offered no problems at all. That's the trouble with these sailors; they have dull brains to begin with, and they do not know how to get about in the woods. They do excessively stupid and obvious things. It's most annoying. Will you have another glass of Chablis, Mr. Rainsford?""General," said Rainsford firmly, "I wish to leave this island at once."The general raised his thickets of eyebrows; he seemed hurt. "But, my dear fellow," the general protested, "you've only just come. You've had no hunting—""I wish to go today," said Rainsford. He saw the dead black eyes of the general on him, studying him. General Zaroff's face suddenly brightened.He filled Rainsford's glass with venerable Chablis from a dusty bottle."Tonight," said the general, "we will hunt—you and I."

      hes gonna hunt him

    1. Maybe it just sags like a heavy load. Or does it explode?

      The juxtaposition here for a dying dream is dramatic. Maybe it's meant to encompass all the different types of people, and their dreams that can die. Or maybe the ignorance is meant to be a refusal to letting dreams die.

    1. WhyGeneral infrastructure simply takes time to build. You have to carefully design interfaces, write documentation and tests, and make sure that your systems will handle load. All of that is rival with experimentation, and not just because it takes time to build: it also makes the system much more rigid.Once you have lots of users with lots of use cases, it’s more difficult to change anything or to pursue radical experiments. You’ve got to make sure you don’t break things for people or else carefully communicate and manage change.Those same varied users simply consume a great deal of time day-to-day: a fault which occurs for 1% of people will present no real problem in a small prototype, but it’ll be high-priority when you have 100k users.Once this playbook becomes the primary goal, your incentives change: your goal will naturally become making the graphs go up, rather than answering fundamental questions about your system.

      The reason the conceptual architecture tends to freeze is because there is a tradeoff between a large user base and the ability to run radical experiments. If you've got a lot of users, there will always be a critical mass of complaints when the experiment blows up.

      Secondly, it takes a lot of time to scale up. This is time that you cannot spend experimenting.

      Andy here is basically advocating remaining in Explore mode a little bit longer than is usually recommended. Doing so will increase your chances of climbing the highest peak during the Exploit mode.

    1. Online education will continue to expand; again, it’s just a question of how much. And perhaps just as important, a question of the quality of the online education that will be available.

      Critical question ...

    1. The objective of Let’s Encrypt and the ACME protocol is to make it possible to set up an HTTPS server and have it automatically obtain a browser-trusted certificate, without any human intervention. This is accomplished by running a certificate management agent on the web server. To understand how the technology works, let’s walk through the process of setting up https://example.com/ with a certificate management agent that supports Let’s Encrypt. There are two steps to this process. First, the agent proves to the CA that the web server controls a domain. Then, the agent can request, renew, and revoke certificates for that domain. Domain Validation Let’s Encrypt identifies the server administrator by public key. The first time the agent software interacts with Let’s Encrypt, it generates a new key pair and proves to the Let’s Encrypt CA that the server controls one or more domains. This is similar to the traditional CA process of creating an account and adding domains to that account. To kick off the process, the agent asks the Let’s Encrypt CA what it needs to do in order to prove that it controls example.com. The Let’s Encrypt CA will look at the domain name being requested and issue one or more sets of challenges. These are different ways that the agent can prove control of the domain. For example, the CA might give the agent a choice of either: Provisioning a DNS record under example.com, or Provisioning an HTTP resource under a well-known URI on http://example.com/ Along with the challenges, the Let’s Encrypt CA also provides a nonce that the agent must sign with its private key pair to prove that it controls the key pair. The agent software completes one of the provided sets of challenges. Let’s say it is able to accomplish the second task above: it creates a file on a specified path on the http://example.com site. The agent also signs the provided nonce with its private key. Once the agent has completed these steps, it notifies the CA that it’s ready to complete validation. Then, it’s the CA’s job to check that the challenges have been satisfied. The CA verifies the signature on the nonce, and it attempts to download the file from the web server and make sure it has the expected content. If the signature over the nonce is valid, and the challenges check out, then the agent identified by the public key is authorized to do certificate management for example.com. We call the key pair the agent used an “authorized key pair” for example.com. Certificate Issuance and Revocation Once the agent has an authorized key pair, requesting, renewing, and revoking certificates is simple—just send certificate management messages and sign them with the authorized key pair. To obtain a certificate for the domain, the agent constructs a PKCS#10 Certificate Signing Request that asks the Let’s Encrypt CA to issue a certificate for example.com with a specified public key. As usual, the CSR includes a signature by the private key corresponding to the public key in the CSR. The agent also signs the whole CSR with the authorized key for example.com so that the Let’s Encrypt CA knows it’s authorized. When the Let’s Encrypt CA receives the request, it verifies both signatures. If everything looks good, it issues a certificate for example.com with the public key from the CSR and returns it to the agent. Revocation works in a similar manner. The agent signs a revocation request with the key pair authorized for example.com, and the Let’s Encrypt CA verifies that the request is authorized. If so, it publishes revocation information into the normal revocation channels (i.e. OCSP), so that relying parties such as browsers can know that they shouldn’t accept the revoked certificate.
    1. starting data scientists using pandas to build simple data wrangling pipelines (e.g. load this csv, delete this row etc). This is quick but it also means that you now need to install pandas just to do that (and what happens if you want to start doing integrated testing, you are now installing a very substantial lib every time etc).

      I'd say that this is not a strong reason against Pandas/in favor of Data Packages. Every data scientist working in Python will already have Pandas installed, and will use it all the time. It's a common pattern in data analysis, already.

    1. n 2016, the parents of another unwilling subject sued the image’s creator, a news organization for publishing the image in a story about it, and a dancer on the show “Dancing With the Stars,” who the suit contended contributed to the image’s spread and the subject’s emotional distress by reposting the image with negative comments on social media.

      One can say that you can about sue anyone just about anything now a days. The fact is that it's sadly to easy to access people's private images and unload to social media for everyone to see without your consent.

    1. That works, but it's pointless. There's no reason to declare i in that position with a const, since the whole point of such a variable in that position is to be used for counting iterations. Just use a different loop form, like a while loop, or use a let!

      yeah what is the point of this.

    1. Big Disciplines

      What I noted since the really big ideas carry 95% of the freight, it wasn’t at all hard for me to pick up all the big ideas from all the big disciplines and make them a standard part of my mental routines. Once you have the ideas, of course, they are no good if you don’t practice – if you don’t practice you lose it. So, I went through life constantly practicing this model of the multidisciplinary approach. Well, I can’t tell you what that’s done for me. It’s made life more fun, it’s made me more constructive, it’s made me more helpful to others, it’s made me enormously rich, you name it, that attitude really helps. It doesn’t help you just to know them enough just so you can give them back on an exam and get an A. You have to learn these things in such a way that they’re in a mental latticework in your head and you automatically use them for the rest of your life. – Charlie Munger, 2007 USC Gould School of Law Commencement Speech (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5U0TE4oqj24)

    1. I like design principles that can be formulated as: X, even over Y. It’s not saying that Y is unimportant, just that X is more important: Usability, even over profitability. Or: Profitability, even over usability. Design principles formulated this way help to crystalise priorities.
    1. This page was submitted to HN but got flagged.

      I've wanted to use AI-powered voice assistants to work on code for a while. Last night just as I was about to get in the shower, it struck me again, and I spent an hour daydreaming—being able to still work while out for a walk, sketching things out in quasi-literate programming style.

      It's not even that far off. Inform7's input language looks like English prose.

      Rather than assertions like "The Kitchen is a room. The Dining Room is north of the Kitchen", you'd spec things like, "This program is called Nickel, and it' a static site generator. The Nickel class has a processPosts method and a processOtherPages method." You might go for a two hour walk and have a halfway working program and a nice design document fleshed out by the time you get back.

      It's natural that you might be able to go home, work on the program using more conventional methods, and then feed source from the project repo back into the system for a more detailed model. Poking at things is the problem that IF parsers were actually created to handle. So the next day you might be working on it again while asking questions like, "check processPosts return type".

  9. sites.google.com sites.google.com
    1. ‘Then what will we do afterwards?’‘We’ll be fine afterwards. Just like we were before.’‘What makes you think so?’‘That’s the only thing that bothers us. It’s the only thing that’s made us unhappy.’

      The American is trying to imply that Jig should have an abortion when he says, "We'll be fine afterwards, Just like we were before."- maybe the American believes it will impact their relationship in a negative way.

    2. ‘I’ll go with you and I’ll stay with you all the time. They just let the air in and then it’s all perfectly natural.’

      They are talking about the girl getting an abortion. He keeps repeating that it's simple and they 'let the air in', without actually getting into the technicalities of the operation. He's putting a lot of effort into minimizing the physical and mental impact of the procedure.

    3. ‘It’s really an awfully simple operation, Jig,’ the man said. ‘It’s not really an operation at all.’The girl looked at the ground the table legs rested on.‘I know you wouldn’t mind it, Jig. It’s really not anything. It’s just to let the air in.’The girl did not say anything.‘I’ll go with you and I’ll stay with you all the time. They just let the air in and then it’s all perfectly natural.’‘Then what will we do afterwards?’‘We’ll be fine afterwards. Just like we were before.’‘What makes you think so?’‘That’s the only thing that bothers us. It’s the only thing that’s made us unhappy.’

      They're here to make something go away, something that makes them unhappy. Also the girl's name is Jig, or nickname

    1. But not all disturbances are equal. Remember that Keynes quotation about changing your mind in light of changed facts? It’s cited in countless books, including one written by me and another by my coauthor. Google it and you will find it’s all over the Internet. Of the many famous things Keynes said it’s probably the most famous. But while researching this book, I tried to track it to its source and failed. Instead, I found a post by a Wall Street Journal blogger, which said that no one has ever discovered its provenance and the two leading experts on Keynes think it is apocryphal. 7 In light of these facts, and in the spirit of what Keynes apparently never said, I concluded that I was wrong. And I have now confessed to the world. Was that hard? Not really. Many smart people made the same mistake, so it’s not embarrassing to own up to it. The quotation wasn’t central to my work and being right about it wasn’t part of my identity. But if I had staked my career on that quotation, my reaction might have been less casual. Social psychologists have long known that getting people to publicly commit to a belief is a great way to freeze it in place, making it resistant to change. The stronger the commitment, the greater the resistance.

      Just double-checking whether this section is all entirely quotations from the book? I ask because the other paragraphs on the google doc. have the > symbol, whereas this one doesn't.

    2. Supersmart: are they super intelligent? No, but they are generally reasonably smart. Superquants: are the SFs just math geniuses? No, but they are all numerate and they have a good understanding of basic probability, including base rates etc. (something most of us don’t have). Supernewsjunkies: are SFs just good because they consume lots of information? Yes and no. It’s the quality and variety of what they consume; many of the good forecasters did not spend that much time reading material.

      These numbering are out of sync with your headings below, e.g. below, Section 7 is superquants.

    1. Make it clear that signing up is optional. Consent must be “freely given”; you may not coerce users into joining your mailing list or make it appear as if joining the list is mandatory. For this reason, you must make it clear that signing up is optional. This is especially relevant in cases where you offer free white-papers (or e-books) for download. While the user’s email address is required for the delivery of the service, signing up for your newsletter is not. In such a case, you must not make it appear as if signing-up to the newsletter list mandatory and must make it clear that it is optional.

      Question (answer below)

      Are they saying that it's not allowed to make signing up for a mailing list a precondition/requirement for anything? This was surprising to me.

      So if you have a newsletter sign-up page that sends a digital bonus gift (like an e-book) to new subscribers, are required to completely change/repurpose your "newsletter sign-up page" into a "download e-book page" (that has an optional checkbox to also sign up for the newsletter, if you want)? That seems dumb to me, since it requires completely reversing the purpose of the page — which was, in my mind, primarily about signing up for the newsletter, with a bonus (an essentially optional one) thrown in for those who do so. Are you required to either repurpose it like that or remove the free bonus offer that would be sent to new subscribers?

      The irony of this is that it requires websites that have a newsletter sign-up page like that to change it into a "newsletter sign-up page" where the newsletter sign-up part is optional. Which make you look kind of stupid, making a page that claims to be one thing but doesn't necessarily do what it says it's for.

      Does this mean, in effect, that you may not lawfully provide any sort of incentive or reward for signing up for something (like a mailing list)? As long as it's very clear that some action is required before delivery of some thing, I don't see why this sort of thing should not be permitted? Would this fall under contract law? And as such, wouldn't such a contract be allowed and valid? Are mailing lists a special class of [service] that has special requirements like this? Or is it part of a broader category to which this requirement applies more generally?

      Why is requiring the user to provide an email address before they can download a digital reward allowed but not requiring signing up to a mailing list? Why isn't it required that even the email address be optional to provide? (To answer my own question, probably because it's allowed to allow a user to request a specific thing to be sent via email, and an email address is required in order to fulfill that request. But...) It seems that the website could just provide a direct link to download it via HTTP/FTP/etc. as an option for users that chose not to provide an email address. (But should they be required to provide that option anytime they / just because they provide the option to have the same thing delivered via email?)

      Answer

      Looks like my question was answered below:

      Explicit Form (where the purpose of the sign-up mechanism is unequivocal). So for example, in a scenario where your site has a pop-up window that invites users to sign up to your newsletter using a clear phrase such as: “Subscribe to our newsletter for access to discount vouchers and product updates!“, the affirmative action that the user performs by typing in their email address would be considered valid consent.

      So the case I described, where it is made very clear that the incentive that is offered is conditional on subscribing, is listed as an exception to the general rule. That's good; it should be allowed.

    1. “Just think of ‘let’ as initiating a computational process, with forces defined by the lisp language and interacting via the lisp engine with the outside world. Then letting computers be like cars makes more sense. Do you recall that a lisp program is just a list?” Abu nodded, but interjected. “It’s really a list missing its outermost parentheses, right?” Til’s glint was piercing. “Ah, but there’s an implied pair of outermost parentheses!” Ila fairly stumbled over her tongue trying to blurt out. “And a ‘let nil’ form!” Now it was Abu’s turn to be puzzled. He said, “Wait, why nil?” Ila rushed on, “It just means that your program can be self-contained, with nil extra environment needed to run. Just let it go, let it run!”

      Extended reference to 'let', from lisp

    1. Although I was theoretically convinced that radioactivity affects nature, I still could not imagine what it would actually look like

      It is often difficult to understand the way radiation affects things other than human beings, because the focus of studies on Chernobyl affected areas tends to be on the human element. It is also possible that people struggle to envision the changes in the Chernobyl environment because they cannot see the radiation or its effects from somewhere across the world, they just know that it’s there and things are vulnerable to damage by it.

    1. Does a China-based company selling goods over a website only drafted in Chinese need to comply with the GDPR just because it’s possible, from a practical point of view, that some EU-based Chinese persons might purchase something from it? In principle we’d say no, unless it can be proven, that the company is doing relevant business with EU-based customers, or is addressing them expressly (for instance, by informing that “delivery to the EU” or “payment from an EU bank account” are possible etc.).
    1. . It ain't the lecturing I mind. I'll lecture them blue in the face, I will, and not turn a hair. It's making a gentleman of me that I object to. Who asked him to make a gentleman of me? I was happy. I was free. I touched pretty nigh everybody for money when I wanted it, same as I touched you, Henry Higgins. Now I am worrited; tied neck and heels; and everybody touches me for money. It's a fine thing for you, says my solicitor. Is it? says I. You mean it's a good thing for you, I says. When I was a poor man and had a solicitor once when they found a pram in the dust cart, he got me off, and got shut of me and got me shut of him as quick as he could. Same with the doctors: used to shove me out of the hospital before I could hardly stand on my legs, and nothing to pay. Now they finds out that I'm not a healthy man and can't live unless they looks after me twice a day. In the house I'm not let do a hand's turn for myself: somebody else must do it and touch me for it. A year ago I hadn't a relative in the world except two or three that wouldn't speak to me. Now I've fifty, and not a decent week's wages among the lot of them. I have to live for others and not for myself: that's middle class morality. You talk of losing Eliza. Don't you be anxious: I bet she's on my doorstep by this: she that could support herself easy by selling flowers if I wasn't respectable. And the next one to touch me will be you, Henry Higgins. I'll have to learn to speak middle class language from you, instead of speaking proper English. That's where you'll come in; and I daresay that's what you done it for.

      In this monologue Doolittle expresses that being wealthy was not all he dreamed of. He reflects on his life prior to his newfound wealth and acknowledges that he was "happy" and "free" , yet now he is "worried" being "solicited". The change in connotation behind these words reflects the grave difference Doolittle feels has occurred in his life. He go on to say that now everyone waits on him hand and foot, even a change in the hospital which Shaw includes to highlight the issues in public health care systems. While this whole play is about the men trying to prepare Eliza for the wealthy society, the larger argument of it is that high society is not all one thinks it may be. People use people for their wealth and one is unable to tell if someone is actually being genuine or just using them; it also comes with a multitude of responsibilities.

    1. One of the most promising of the young Negro poets said to me once, “I want to be a poet–not a Negro poet,” meaning, I believe, “I want to write like a white poet”; meaning subconsciously, “I would like to be a white poet”; meaning behind that, “I would like to be white.”

      While I understand the point Hughes' is making. I've heard statements like this in the past. Gabrielle Hamilton has said something similar in her memoir Blood, Bones and Butter. Hamilton is a successful chef. Invited to a convention for best chefs of the year, Hamilton was accompanying the best Female Chefs of the Year. Hamilton was upset that she wasn't just recognized as a chef, and angered by only being recognized successful because she's a women. I think if Hughes were to read this in Hamilton's memoir, he'd think that subconsciously Hamilton wants to be a man. However, Hamilton was pushing more for being recognized as a successful chef, and not to be recognized only because she's a female chef. Similarly, I think it's worth considering that the poet Hughes is referring to could mean that he wants to be recognized for his artistic success only for the prestige of the occupation, not because of his race as a preface.

    2. One of the most promising of the young Negro poets said to me once, “I want to be a poet–not a Negro poet,” meaning, I believe, “I want to write like a white poet”; meaning subconsciously, “I would like to be a white poet”; meaning behind that, “I would like to be white.” And I was sorry the young man said that, for no great poet has ever been afraid of being himself.

      I think many writers feel like this who want to be heard not just by one audience but multiple audiences. Also much work that is praised and acknowledged if you are white and if you are a minority or a person of color it won’t have the same effect. Hughes is really rejecting his own identity and it’s tough

    3. jazz is their child

      This, to me, is evidence that the dominant culture is always worth resisting. Jazz is music played on the outcast instruments of the orchestra. The lonely saxophone, abandoned in the closet at the symphony, found its true voice in Sidney Bechet, the Hawk, Pres, and Bird. Jazz took the individual drums from the orchestra and combined them into the kit that we hear today in almost all forms of music in the west. Just because the rich people do it doesn't mean it's the only way.

    1. The Internet isn't just a network of computers. It's a network of networks. The connection points between networks are called routers, networking devices that route traffic between subnetworks on the Internet. The routers only know how to pass information on to the next router or to the final destination; the routers do not analyze what's inside each packet of data (as long as you live in a country without Internet censorship). Making sense of the information happens at the destination computer. This is called the end to end principle.

      Het internet is niet alleen een netwerk van computers. Het is een netwerk van netwerken. De verbindingspunten tussen netwerken heten routers, wat netwerk apparaten zijn die zorgen voor het routeverkeer tussen subnetwerken op het internet. De routers weten alleen hoe ze informatie aan de volgende router of aan de eindbestemming door moeten geven: De routers analyseren niet wat er in elk pakketje data staat (als je niet in een land woont met internet censoring). Het begrijpen van de informatie gebeurt op de doelcomputer. Dit wordt het end to end principe genoemd.

    1. You shouldn't be here, but it's okay. It's a dream. She can't find you here. In a minute you're going to wake up, and everything is going to seem like it's the same, but it's not. There's a way out. Are you listening to me? You can't forget when you wake up. You. can't

      Reading this felt like a whisper, I actively heard Machado whisper to me as she is in a deep panic of her surroundings. In this scene, she is talking to herself while also trying to communicate with the reader. This passage makes me just as helpless as she does throughout her whole situation. The creativity that exudes out of Machado with these fragmented yet linear thoughts blew me away. Another example of how her trauma manifested itself in her writing and even in her dreams. The last line hit the hardest as she is trying not to forget like a scene in Memento, and yet she falls in the same cycle of waking up and hating every minute of her time with her partner. The little emblem of hope shimmers ever so slightly here as she actively says, "There's a way out" before waking up and letting her of these thoughts. Even as she is trying to speak, she is cut off from her thought process and reverts to her relationship pattern of pain and destruction.

    2. On that night, the gun is set upon the mantlepiece. The metaphorical gun, of course. If there were a literal gun, you'd probably be dead.

      Anton Chekhov allegedly said in the 1880s: “If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise don't put it there.” In dramatic performance or writing or film, anything explicitly mentioned must be used. Once something is used or introduced, it will be used later.

      In this moment, Machado says that a “metaphorical gun” has been placed on the mantelpiece: “The gun is set upon the mantlepiece” (125). Machado emphasizes the “metaphorical gun” as opposed to a literal gun. This means that the presence of the threat is out in the open, in an open space that is shared between Machado and her girlfriend. That threat will not go away. It will come back. It’s not going anywhere, just like Chekhov’s gun. Once it is introduced, it is there to stay—there is no turning back or erasing what has been mentioned. Machado, here, is explaining how the threat, the presence of danger, is constant and looming until she is freed from the abusive relationship.

    1. already.  However, what Microsoft does not have is a 1000+ customer base purchasing RPA specifically because it is RPA.  A customer base where the prime customer is not sitting in the CIO's organization.  It's also clear that the tech majors are all waiting to see who blinks first with RPA.  Just buying up some kit (i.e. SAP/Contextor) isn't going to do much.  Partnering only really works when there is real skin in the game and a colossal global services network to implement and support the product.  UiPath can claim is has built a pretty decent global delivery infrastructure and channel to market - and its huge show in Las Vegas was clearly designed to show that off to the world The bigger issue is money, and how m

      Automation

    1. The amount of attention paid to movies is directly related to pictures of qual-ity. It's the movies that are works of art that create this inter-est, even if they're not on the ten-highest-grosses list too often.

      I completely agree with this statement. Just because some movies make more money than others is no reason for them to be "worse" movies. There are many other factors that cause a movie to make more or less money than just whether it is a great movie or not.

    1. Don't focus too much on the salary. It's just one tiny part of the whole package.Your dev job pays your rent, food and savings. I assume that most dev jobs do this quite well.Beyond this, the main goal of a job is to increase your future market value, your professional network and to have fun. So. basically it's about how much you are worth in your next job and that you enjoy your time.A high salary doesn't help you if you do stuff which doesn't matter in a few years.

      Don't focus on the salary in your dev job.

    1. Some people will insist that technology is neutral — “it’s just a tool,” they’ll say. “What matters is how you use it.” But a technology always has a history, and it has a politics. A technology likely has a pedagogical bent as well — how it trains people to use it, if nothing else — and even if one tries to use a tool for a radically different task than it was built for, there are always remnants of those political and historical and pedagogical designs. Technologies are never “just tools.” They are, to borrow from the physicist Ursula Franklin, practices. Technologies are systems. Technology “entails far more than its individual material components,” Franklin wrote in The Real World of Technology. “Technology involves organizations, procedures, symbols, new words, equations, and, most of all, a mindset.”

      A holistic way to think about technology.

    1. friendship

      At the center of this story is friendship, partnership. It's a nice way to avoid the potentially off-putting sense of an individual self-mythologizing (imagine just Jamie talking about how great he is). That can be done well too, but it's just easier to be on their side when what we're cheering on is teamwork, collaboration, community, etc.

    1. The one that managed to slow him the longest was a torn left Achilles’ tendon late in the 2012-13 season. Of course, stubborn as he was, Bryant did not want to accept the on-court diagnosis he received from Gary Vitti, the longtime Lakers athletic trainer.“I told him it’s ruptured and he’s done,” Vitti told The Times in December 2017. “He said, ‘Can’t you just tape it up?’”

      Narrative of being the greatest NBA player

    1. permeates

      When you live in a big city like New York, you know all too well how the smells of spices and cooking meats can permeate a hallway, easily passing through those thin apartment doors to make your mouth water.

      The verb permeate literally means to "pass through." It's often used to describe smells or liquids that not only pass through, but also spread to fill an entire area. When you bake cookies, you'll notice that the rich, sweet smell of those cookies isn't confined just to your oven — it permeates the entire kitchen and even the whole house.

    1. School is not only a place for study, but a place to prepare us for future life

      When school is online it often has all the things stripped away that make school a community and not just an activity. I think this is a hard balancing act for teachers. The attention span just isn't there online, lessons usually have to be shorter and the times when all students are together for synchronous meetings they can't all see each other and it's more controlled.

  10. Apr 2020
    1. I just say "the mouse with the ear on its back."

      It's interesting that they (he) doesn't want to link their name to it, or at least not to draw any special attention to it.

    1. And yet there is cause. There is always cause for everything.

      Here it's not just Van Helsing saying what they believe in, it's Bram Stoker promising that by the end of the book all of the occurrences will be explained, much like a mystery novel.

    1. Notebook files, however, are essentially giant JSON documents that contain the base-64 encoding of images and binary data. For a complex notebook, it would be extremely hard for anyone to read through a plaintext diff and draw meaningful conclusions—a lot of it would just be rearranged JSON and unintelligible blocks of base-64.

      Git traces plaintext differences and with notebooks it's a problem

    1. Slapping a coat of mayonesa on them to make palatable to taste buds estados-unidenses and

      This stood out to be because saying “mayonesa” could very well mean that they just made it white or other white people to eat it up. It’s a sad reality that most art work from beautiful colored people will never be seen while white peoples stolen work is considered genius.

    2. Mexicanas die en el otro lado too. Mexicanas get raped in the USA too. You know better, you know how dangerous the United States of America is, and you still chose to frame this place as a sanctuary. It’s not.

      i think for many, especially those in other countries who see the US as this safe heaven don't realize that many bad things happen to people from other backgrounds who aren't white, prejudice, racism, discriminating etc they go through it just for looking different than a white person

    1. Of this I recollect an instance:—a woman was convicted before the judges of adultery, and delivered over, as the custom was, to her husband to be punished. Accordingly he determined to put her to death: but it being found, just before her execution, that she had an infant at her breast; and no woman being prevailed on to perform the part of a nurse, she was spared on account of the child. The men, however, do not preserve the same constancy to their wives, which they expect from them; for they indulge in a plurality, though seldom in more than two. Their mode of marriage is thus:—both parties are usually betrothed when young by their parents, (though I have known the males to betroth themselves). On this occasion a feast is prepared, and the bride and bridegroom stand up in the midst of all their friends, who are assembled for the purpose, while he declares she is thenceforth to be looked upon as his wife, and that no other person is to pay any addresses to her.

      It's so sad that the marriages are arranged. It undermines the constitution of genuine love I think, usually in exchange for something else (i.e. status, wealth, beauty). What's even more sad from this is that, it's generally misogynistic, to the point where she is treated like property and extremely one-sided. Like there is no fair trial, if the wife is accused of infidelity, they're not even looking for proof, it's just "off to your husband for punishment" which is usually death. It's hypocritical too cause they have side pieces??

    1. “Look, I feel like you’re forgetting the fact that this IS the women’s life too,
      • 8th annotation: Internet Encylopedia of Philosophy/ Abortion

      • “Abortion | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.” The Modified Standard Argument, Mar. 2020, www.iep.utm.edu/abortion/#SH1c.

      • https://www.iep.utm.edu/abortion/#SH1c

      • Evidence: “That even if the fetus is a person, abortion may be justifiable in many cases,” (Gordon 1).

      • Pro-choice people agree that abortion is justified even if the theory of a fetus having the right to live is true.

      • At this point, I thought it was important to re-mention what the character thought from the very beginning. It’s just the base or the overall opinion to pro-choice people on this matter.

        • As an author, I wanted to bring the whole idea back to it being a "women's life" concern for pro-choice people. My opinion on this is that yes, it is the woman’s life, but that’s not the full story.
    1. I think it’s important to realize that if Gov. Tony Evers had not declared 2019 the Year of Clean Drinking Water, we wouldn’t be here today making sure that we’re acting on not just clean drinking water, but surface water and water quality in general,

      Good point! Thanks Tony for doing that and Shankland for bringing it up!

    1. argues

      My fellow classmates have done a good job of highlighting this section, but I just wanted to make sure to point out how much work this word is doing. There's a lot of idea being thrust around in this paragraph, and I think it's important to remember that this is just a view.

    2. The first words, images, and concepts that come to our minds are often the most obvious / the most expected / the most banal. Thus, if we wish to be creative, we can benefit greatly by gathering a wide array of disparate materials and then taking the time to experiment with combining and re-arranging these materials in novel ways

      English courses have taught me to read more than just the surface. It's about what the author is symbolizing using themes and characteristics.

    3. "importance of interestingly associational juxtapositions of word, image, and sound"

      I think it's important to notice that it's word, image, and sound here and not just one of them or the world "or" instead of and. I think it's really important that they work together.

    1. And not just any Democrat, one that has a documented record of racism, who has been accused several times of sexual abuse, and who is pro-austerity, anti-union, anti-immmigrant, and a friend of Wall Street.

      So yeah this sums up why I can’t get behind Biden even with trump as the alternative. If Democrats elect Biden and then continue with business as usual, then that means trump and the other virulently racist right wing politicians have succeeded in cementing the Overton window far more right than it was even 4-5 years ago. It’s an acknowledgement that the Democratic Party cares so much more for a potential grasp at power than for actual meaningful change that they’re willing to capitulate to conservatives and nominate one of the most conservative Democrats in modern history. (And I doubt that will even be enough to get those votes).

    1. Some people think that nobody's in charge of the Internet—that everyone just cooperates freely with no central organization. It's true that free cooperation plays an important role, but people can't just pick any IP address or host name they want, or else there would be conflicts. For example, we can't start a server named bjc.org, because that name is already in use (by a health care provider in St. Louis, Missouri). Until 2009, the Internet domain name hierarchy was entirely controlled by the United States government, with the details delegated to ICANN (the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers).

      Sommige mensen denken dat niemand de baas is van het internet -- dat iedereen gewoon vrij samenwerkt zonder centrale organisatoe. Het is waar dat vrije samenwerking een belangrijke rol speelt, maar mensen kunnen niet gewoon zomaar elk IP-adres of elke domeinnaam pakken die ze willen, anders zouden er conflicten ontstaan. Bijvoorbeeld, wij kunnen niet een server opstarten die "bjc.org"heet, want die naam is al in gebruik (door een verzekeringsmaatschappij in Missouri). Tot 2009 was de internet domeinnaam hiërarchie volledig in de controle van de overheid van de Verenigde Staten, met de details toegekend aan ICANN (de Internet Corporatie voor Toegewezen Namen en Nummers).

    1. This is very interesting to me because I always thought the blue check mark meant the person was famous or trustworthy. I wouldn't have thought that it just meant they are that person. I think this is important to know because most people believe many things on the internet, especially if it's coming from someone with a blue check mark.

    2. nly viable literacy solution to web misinformation involves always checking any information in your stream that you find interesting, emotion-producing, or shareable. It’s not enough to check the stuff that is suspicious: if you apply your investigations selectively, you’ve already lost the battle.

      I totally agree, most of the time I just take the information without really knowing if the source is reliable or not. Most of the time fake or unreliable sources just use large, bold headings to catch the viewers attention.

    3. More people than you would think believe that the blue checkmark = trustworthy. But all the blue checkmark really does is say that the person is who they say they are, that they are the person of that name and not an imposter.

      This is a misconception that I believed in before reading this article. You look at the check mark and think it's a reliable source, but we always forget that it just means that is the verified account of that person. Some verified accounts give out accurate information, but there is fake news all over social media.

    1. It’s about Sven, who enjoyed woodcarving, and Calvin, who liked rocket ships. It’s about remembering that people are more than just how they ended.

      The writer hints at the theme(s) of the game.

    1. Did run pure blood; and many lusty Romans Came smiling, and did bathe their hands in it.

      I think that the Romans washing their hands in the blood of Caesar symbolizes the guiltiness of the Roman people. The Roman people do not want Caesar to have the crown because they fear he will turn his power against Rome despite him not having a past full of abuse of power. In response to this fear they want to kill him before he potentially abuses his power and destroys the fate of the city. In reality though, the city is in greater danger if they kill Caesar and their blood is in their hands. Except its not just Caesars blood in their hands it's Romes blood too.

    1. But Anon the intern needs to be able to open up Programming™ and click ‘New Web Form’

      I've seen critics of this post take this part the wrong way—viewing it as allegiance to the wrong side on the GUI vs CLI wars. It's a shame that those folks miss the point.

      Jamie could have just as easily said here, "Siri/Alexa/Cortana/Mycroft, create a programming project with a Web form for me", and the point would be exactly the same.

      The interesting thing is that in the next section, where he writes about "staring at [...] a blank editor page", he paints a picture very close to the phenomenon that I've heard so many programmers voice their complaints about—in interviews where they've been asked to solve a problem from scratch, as if their performance on that task reflected their abilities in refactoring and the "APIs and glue" part that a big part of software development involves.

    1. The Pembroke Welsh Corgi is a breed of dog that is popular all around the world for their tiny legs and stubby tails. This breed has a rich history, originating in Wales. It is said that the Vikings used the Corgis to establish their settlements and Welsh spinners relied on them to herd sheep so they could be sheered for cl

      Add padding around the text, left-align it, cut it in half, and make the font smaller, so it's a true dashboard, i.e. the content is all viewable at once on the screen. Right now, users just see a lot of text below the title.

    1. You don’t have to do it. I’m choosing not to do it.

      This is foolish. I just cannot believe we in the United States have decided this is the kind of leadership we need.

      FWIW, the mask advice is an example of how our understanding has evolved. Before we knew there were so many asymptomatic carriers, rationing masks for medical workers made sense. But once we learned that a good portion of the spread was happening via carriers who fully believed they were not sick (not illogical: they showed no symptoms), the advice rightly shifted. Masking ourselves up so WE DON'T SPREAD THE VIRUS TO OTHERS supplanted prior conclusions. This is NOT a sign of an evil plot or even incompetence – it's the logical progression of our knowledge given the real-time education we're getting about this coronavirus and Covid-19.

    2. One City Council member told me that health officials “had been trying to say that publicly for weeks, but this mayor refuses to trust the experts—it’s mind-boggling.”

      Again: it's not just Trump who failed us on this. De Blasio really doesn't look great here...

    3. By the second week of April, Washington State had roughly one recorded fatality per fourteen thousand residents.

      Public health policy: when it works, it's almost invisible. I fear that many Washington State residents fail to appreciate how well we've done at "flattening the curve" despite being hit so hard early on. As I write this, we are just 18th-worst among the 50 states + DC in per-capita Covid-19 cases and 15th in per-capita deaths.

    1. "I get questions all the time: 'What are you going to do when you retire?' As if I had no life, no talent outside of playing basketball," Bryant said. "It absolutely drives me crazy. 'You just going to golf all day?' I'm, like, 'No. Who the f--- said that?' It's maddening."

      This section touches on Kobe's life and why this is a bigger news story than just some basketball player dying in a helicopter crash

    1. Feb 14: MOCA visit

      I think our MOCA visit, and the Student-led discussions were the activities I found most confusing. I'm not an art guy, it's just an art form that doesn't appeal to me. I didn't see a connection between MOCA and our classroom, and just overall, thought the museum was forgettable. The student-led discussion was also confusing. I think mostly because as students, we heavily relied on David's questions and analysis to fully understand a document's significance and importance. Having students do the teaching, made teaching the documents not as fluid or easily understandable. I feel that the significance of some documents were lost on the class.

    1. Here’s how you currently reuse something in WordPress, for example. It’s a pretty horrific process. Log into the WordPress source site Open the file, go to the text editor. Select all the text, cntrl-c copy it. Go log into your target WordPress site Create a new page and name it. Go into the text editor, and paste the text in. Save Draft. Go back to the source site. Right click on the images in the post and download them. Go back to the target site. Open the Media Gallery and upload the images you just downloaded. Go through you new post on the target site, and replace the links pointing to the old images with links pointing to the images you just uploaded. Preview the site, do any final cleanup. Resize images if necessary. Check to make sure you didn’t pull in any weird styles that didn’t transfer (Damn you mso-!) Save and post. You’re done! Oh wait, you’re not done. Go to the source post and copy the URL. Try to find the author’s name on the page and remember it. Go to the bottom of your new “target” page and add attribution “Original Text by Jane Doe”. Select Jane Doe and paste in the hyperlink. Test the link. Now you’re REALLY done! It’s about an five to ten minute process per page, depending on the number of images that have to be ported.

      One of the things I love about the idea of using TiddlyWiki for OER. Drag, drop, done!

      Of course it would be nice if the metadata fields of Tiddlers included links to the permalinks of the original as well as their Creative Commons license.

    1. In a polarized society, it seems likely that overt politicization may undercut both the acceptance of scientific evidence, and it's very process.As a result, we recommended that:"Scientists need to stay a-political as best as possible, just as we do in normal scientific discourse.· We recommend modelling ourselves as a community on other public servants and the codes for political neutrality they have developed, while acknowledging that there will be cases where bad faith actions by governments distort scientific truth."
    1. African American high school student being educated via television in 11958, during the period that the Little Rock schools were closed to avoid integration.

      It's sad to see that they would close schools down just to keep the schools from integrating.

    1. It is the final 5 percent of the vote count that is critical, for here Morales’s advantage nationwide rises from just under 9 percent to 10.57 percent — this would require his advantage over Mesa to increase by around 115,000 votes. How does this happen? Well, in that final 5 percent of the vote count, Morales’s vote count grows by 167,000 votes, but Mesa’s vote count grows only by 50,000. It is this great divergence, unpredicted and unanticipated by any previous part of the election trends, that pushed Morales over the 10 percent margin to outright victory.

      This whole thing is a cut-and-paste from the OAS report, and it's really got me confused because that part, aside from being wildly incorrect, is also specific to the analysis of the Cómputo, not the TREP. It literally appears right below a table based entirely on Cómputo data and time stamps. All the previous parts in this opinion piece seem to be from the TREP section. The first graph and the other one with the discontinuity? They're from the TREP section. The bar graph with the departments? It seems similar to that explanation from the TREP section. At what point did things turn to the Cómputo? Whatever the case, this part is, like, excruciatingly bad. It makes you wonder if he has any shame or even cares about being correct. Oh well.

    2. In contrast to what these authors say, the statistical evidence suggests irregularities — or worse.

      I've gotta say: I have really come to loathe this word 'irregularities'. For something to be irregular, there must of course be a baseline of regularity. A careful researcher would, say, look to previous elections for patterns, but instead nearly everyone operates from some platonic ideal in which all the trend lines are perfectly straight and reporting order is effectively random. It's the most insane thing in the world and is just about the farthest thing from serious study that you could imagine, but is readily approved by a complacent news media.

    1. COVID-19 is far more than just a data science issue—it’s a massive public health problem that has resulted in many deaths and is throwing a harsh light onto how we structure our society when it comes to important things like the availability and affordability of healthcare, worker’s rights, and even freedom of movement.But as a data scientist, I do think it’s important to look at the situation through a data science perspective. We’ve all seen curves on Twitter—exponential, flattened, and otherwise—plotted in Excel and been reassured by them or scared by them or wondered whether we could trust them. That’s a data science question, and there are many similar ones that I want to address here, in the hopes that what I write will inspire others to think about the data and feel more empowered about what to do in this situation.
    1. It’s not just the Nightingale hospitals—clinically led reorganisation is transforming how trusts are working, finds Jacqui ThorntonAs the NHS Nightingale hospitals attract widespread publicity,1 clinically led innovation is quietly—and quickly—transforming practice in acute trusts to cope with covid-19.Across the UK, the pace of change has been “breathtaking,” says Keith Girling, medical director at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust. It’s not just the huge increase in intensive care capacity, there is also the reconfiguration of wards to accommodate more patients and redeployment of staff within those areas.Medical teams are working in completely different ways, with consultant led and delivered care provided around the clock; rotas have been rewritten wholesale; and areas of trusts that are quieter, such as clinical genetics and genitourinary medicine, are lending trainees and equipment to be used in imaginative ways, with consultants picking up the baseline.At the same time, IT proposals that before the outbreak were expected to take months have been accelerated and have come to fruition in days, and new clinical pathways have developed at record speed. This has happened at district general and large teaching hospitals alike. And, crucially, says David Oliver, consultant in geriatrics and acute general medicine at the Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust and a columnist for The BMJ, much of this work was going on well before guidance from central bodies.
    1. It’s a tough time for junior researchers. If you’re one and you ever tried to convince your advisor that this study you’re working on really will take much longer than they’d like, your COVID-19-alerted colleagues are currently putting you out of arguments. In Europe and North America (where most of the English-language literature in psychology is produced), the COVID-19 pandemic started having substantial effects on everyday life — mostly in the form of social distancing — no more than two weeks ago, but psych researchers haven’t been messing about. In this short time, the Psychological Science Accelerator put out a call for “rapid and impactful study proposals on COVID-19”, received 66(!!)[1]Legend: ! = hovering on the brink of significance; !! = decisively significant; !!! = globally significant jQuery("#footnote_plugin_tooltip_1").tooltip({ tip: "#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_1", tipClass: "footnote_tooltip", effect: "fade", fadeOutSpeed: 100, predelay: 400, position: "top right", relative: true, offset: [10, 10] }); proposals in four(!!!) days, sifted through them, decided to run three of them and started preparing the data collection. Chris Chambers called researchers to sign up as reviewers for rapid-review Registered Reports on COVID-19 at Royal Society Open Science, got over 530(!!) responses within 48(!) hours, and moved the first RR to in-principle acceptance in just 6(!!) days which saw 2(!!!) rounds of review.
    1. And often did beguile her of her tears, When I did speak of some distressful stroke That my youth suffer’d.

      The only sorcery and 'magic' going on between them is genuine connection and care. He would just tell her his secrets in depth, every now and again and she came to love him. And despite knowing he might be persecuted for it, decided to love her regardless. It's a very sweet story.

    2. She is abused, stol’n from me, and corrupted By spells and medicines bought of mountebanks; For nature so preposterously to err, Being not deficient, blind, or lame of sense, Sans witchcraft could not.

      I like how misinformed and overtly racist this guy is, it's almost comical. Like his daughter disappears and he just comes to the conclusion that Othello is a wizard, who put her under some spell/potion combination and whisked her away against her will. Like, she probably went with him willingly (as he doesn't seem like a bad guy) if you could just see that for two seconds without looking at his skin color. But go off I guess.

    1. Sure. So I do want to start by just reminding listeners that talking about trauma, learning about trauma, can bring up some feelings, which is a very normal reaction to that. So I just want to remind people, if you notice that, that it’s okay to take a rain check on listening and engaging in this conversation. I also do recommend that even if you feel okay to engage with a discussion about trauma that it’s recommended that you do so in small doses, especially during these very challenging times.

      This is a lovely way to introduce this topic.

    1. We can do this by not just providing the facts, but by also directly cueing changes in people's habits of thought. One simple idea for how to do this is to dramatize as vividly as possible the point at which an interruption in our thinking should occur. It's that moment which we want people to recognize and act on, as it occurs.

      This is a powerful leverage point — it addresses the paradigm, something Donella Meadows argues we consider.

    1. “This must be that Lairen you’ve been talking about!”, resulting in a red-faced Xavier. He was quick to explain that he was just talking about the group in general, not just her, but if anything, it just amused Lairen that he was clearly talking about her, and to see him fumble when he normally was so head strong. 

      i think this is a really interesting and alternative view of xaviers character. i think it's a little out of voice for him, but i like that you included it

    1.     “I hadn’t considered that. I guess I still haven’t really thought this thing through.”    “There’s a lot we’re going to have to learn about time travel, but I suggest we learn it all by just doing it. We can fix our mistakes now. We should take the opportunity to make them.”    The three of them sat on the couch together, staring at the machine. For the moment, the doors stood still, it did not whirr, and it did not shake. This page has paths: 1 2020-01-15T13:41:02-05:00 Alan Bush 37d3438a69de42ac8dc8ddbb729b403057a56928 Second Draft (full reworked draft) Alan Bush 16 splash 2020-04-21T16:51:52-04:00 Alan Bush 37d3438a69de42ac8dc8ddbb729b403057a56928 Contents of this path: 1 2020-04-14T15:17:30-04:00 Ignorance is Bliss?, by Anna Ress 1 plain 2020-04-14T15:17:30-04:00 1 2020-04-16T17:19:47-04:00 The Experiment 2 draft 2 plain 2020-04-16T17:20:55-04:00 1 2020-04-17T09:34:32-04:00 The Traveler, Second Draft by Leo Adaryukov 6 plain 2020-04-17T14:45:21-04:00 1 2020-04-17T22:37:03-04:00 WWIII: The Animals Fight for Earth 2 by Lauren Trumbull (Draft 2) plain 2020-04-17T22:37:19-04:00 1 2020-04-18T00:02:07-04:00 The Year Was 2120 2 Payton Ray plain 2020-04-18T00:03:48-04:00 1 2020-04-19T16:23:18-04:00 The Shadows by Jackson Brewer 1 plain 2020-04-19T16:23:18-04:00 1 2020-04-19T22:19:48-04:00 Uno - Second Draft, by William Fischer 15 yeah i know it's not quite 12k words. that's the first thing i need to fix for the final draft plain 2020-04-19T22:44:33-04:00 1 2020-04-19T23:18:05-04:00 A Loss of Humanity & the Takeover of Technology 1 Cecilia Gomez plain 2020-04-19T23:18:05-04:00 1 2020-04-19T23:32:21-04:00 The Disconnect - Second Draft by Charles Nyberg 3 Written by Charles Nyberg plain 2020-04-19T23:37:40-04:00 1 2020-04-19T23:52:40-04:00 The Mission - Second Draft 2 Robert Vose plain 2020-04-19T23:54:14-04:00 1 2020-04-20T03:06:00-04:00 Off The Grid- Christian Helms 1 Second Draft plain 2020-04-20T03:06:00-04:00 1 2020-04-20T10:25:35-04:00 The Righteous Clash- Baron Woodard 1 plain 2020-04-20T10:25:35-04:00 1 2020-04-20T14:26:05-04:00 Hyperion 1 Draft II plain 2020-04-20T14:26:05-04:00 1 2020-04-19T22:07:27-04:00 the six of us and the three of you - christie balke 2 plain 2020-04-22T01:18:48-04:00

      Definitely a better ending! Still could use some development, especially about whether they would really consider time travel or not, and how they fully view it,

    2. “Meh. I wouldn’t feel comfortable keeping something this important to myself, anyways. I can always put restrictions on it.”    “I’ve got some recommendations, if you want some.”    “uh huh”    “No looping, since that means no clones - just simple one-way trips. Everybody gets an attendant Quail, who ensures they don’t do anything wrong.”    “Wow, that seems like a great way to get a lot of Quails murdered.” Quail mused.    “No bringing stuff back in time. No bringing stuff forward in time. A maximum time you can go forward.”    “Look, I’m super interested in all your interesting restrictions, but I’m not using any.”    “This is a serious mistake. You can’t be saying everybody should be able to go ham on it.”    “There’s no way I can prevent everybody from using the machine wrong. I’m not going to try when any rules I make could just be evaded.”    Kim spoke up. “Couldn’t you just use the machine for that?”    “Huh?”    “You have a literal time machine now. You don’t have to worry about making rules or policing them after the fact - you can go back in time and stop them then.”    “I hadn’t considered that. I guess I still haven’t really thought this thing through.”    “There’s a lot we’re going to have to learn about time travel, but I suggest we learn it all by just doing it. We can fix our mistakes now. We should take the opportunity to make them.”    The three of them sat on the couch together, staring at the machine. For the moment, the doors stood still, it did not whirr, and it did not shake. This page has paths: 1 2020-01-15T13:41:02-05:00 Alan Bush 37d3438a69de42ac8dc8ddbb729b403057a56928 Second Draft (full reworked draft) Alan Bush 16 splash 2020-04-21T16:51:52-04:00 Alan Bush 37d3438a69de42ac8dc8ddbb729b403057a56928 Contents of this path: 1 2020-04-14T15:17:30-04:00 Ignorance is Bliss?, by Anna Ress 1 plain 2020-04-14T15:17:30-04:00 1 2020-04-16T17:19:47-04:00 The Experiment 2 draft 2 plain 2020-04-16T17:20:55-04:00 1 2020-04-17T09:34:32-04:00 The Traveler, Second Draft by Leo Adaryukov 6 plain 2020-04-17T14:45:21-04:00 1 2020-04-17T22:37:03-04:00 WWIII: The Animals Fight for Earth 2 by Lauren Trumbull (Draft 2) plain 2020-04-17T22:37:19-04:00 1 2020-04-18T00:02:07-04:00 The Year Was 2120 2 Payton Ray plain 2020-04-18T00:03:48-04:00 1 2020-04-19T16:23:18-04:00 The Shadows by Jackson Brewer 1 plain 2020-04-19T16:23:18-04:00 1 2020-04-19T22:19:48-04:00 Uno - Second Draft, by William Fischer 15 yeah i know it's not quite 12k words. that's the first thing i need to fix for the final draft plain 2020-04-19T22:44:33-04:00 1 2020-04-19T23:18:05-04:00 A Loss of Humanity & the Takeover of Technology 1 Cecilia Gomez plain 2020-04-19T23:18:05-04:00 1 2020-04-19T23:32:21-04:00 The Disconnect - Second Draft by Charles Nyberg 3 Written by Charles Nyberg plain 2020-04-19T23:37:40-04:00 1 2020-04-19T23:52:40-04:00 The Mission - Second Draft 2 Robert Vose plain 2020-04-19T23:54:14-04:00 1 2020-04-20T03:06:00-04:00 Off The Grid- Christian Helms 1 Second Draft plain 2020-04-20T03:06:00-04:00 1 2020-04-20T10:25:35-04:00 The Righteous Clash- Baron Woodard 1 plain 2020-04-20T10:25:35-04:00 1 2020-04-20T14:26:05-04:00 Hyperion 1 Draft II plain 2020-04-20T14:26:05-04:00 1 2020-04-19T22:07:27-04:00 the six of us and the three of you - christie balke 2 plain 2020-04-22T01:18:48-04:00

      With your use of time travel though, this ending feels anticlimactic. With the paradoxes and the subtle differences in the stocks, it felt like you were building up to something going terribly awry, and here it just sort of ends. If you have the space, I'd recommend expanding the ending, because there's a lot you can do with it here.

    1. This paper is a lot better than the first draft! It's a lot clearer in plot and I really like that you bolded some of the words to show emphasis. There are parts of the story where there are nearly multiple pages of just quotes, so try adding some description to tie in the story a lot more :)

    1. “These findings imply that the first peoples were highly skilled at moving rapidly across an utterly unfamiliar and empty landscape. They had a whole continent to themselves and they were travelling great distances at breathtaking speed.”

      it's interesting how our whole species used to be so physical and able to travel such long distances and now we are part of a society that struggles to even exercise. It's just funny to see how things can change so drastically

    1. Fascinating especially in discussing how use of data science allows psychological distancing from the actual task: predatory loaning

      Capital One collects $23 billion in interest per year—an average that works out to $181 from each family in America. Of course, not every family has a Capital One account, and most public surveys say roughly half of people with credit cards pay them in full and accrue no interest. So simple math tells you that many families are paying Capital One at least $800 in interest every year.

      People at Capital One are extremely friendly. But one striking fact of life there was how rarely anyone acknowledged the suffering of its customers. It’s no rhetorical exaggeration to say that the 3,000 white-collar workers at its headquarters are making good money off the backs of the poor. The conspiracy of silence that engulfed this bottom-line truth spoke volumes about how all of us at Capital One viewed our place in the world, and what we saw when we looked down from our glass tower. This is not meant to offer a broad-brush indictment of business at Capital One; it is hardly the only corporation that has been ethically compromised by capitalism. It is, however, meant to shine a few photons of light on the financial industry in a post-crisis age of acute inequality.

      Amid the daily office banter at Capital One, we hardly ever broached the essence of what we were doing. Instead, we discussed the “physics” of our work. Analysts would commonly say that “whiteboarding”—a gratifying exercise in gaming out equations on the whiteboard to figure out a better way to build a risk model or design an experiment—was the favorite part of their job. Hour-long conversations would oscillate between abstruse metaphors representing indebtedness and poverty, and an equally opaque jargon composed of math and finance-speak.

      If you were not familiar with the almanac of metaphors—many of which, as I understand it, were specific to Capital One—you would not follow the conversations. The “bathtub,” for example, denotes a loan portfolio, because it’s like water down the drain when you lose customers—either because they have closed their account or were fed up with Capital One or have involuntarily defaulted on their loan. When you spend tens of millions of dollars on marketing, that’s turning on the spigot for new water in your “bathtub.”

      It was common to hear analysts say things like, “I just love to solve problems.” But what they were really doing was solving something closer to puzzles. It’s clear to me, for example, that the janitor at my middle school solved problems when she cleaned up trash. It’s far less clear whether analysts at Capital One are solving problems or creating them. In either event, the work culture at this well-appointed lender of dwindling resort is pretty much designed to encourage former students of engineering or math to let their minds drift for a few years and forget whether the equations in front of them represent the laws of thermodynamics or single moms who want to pay for their kids’ Christmas gifts without having to default on their rent or utilities payments.

      Before I managed Capital One’s secured card product, I worked on what we called “Mainstreet proactive credit limit increases” or “Mainstreet pCLIP” for short. Mainstreet was yet another piece of euphemistic in-house jargon; it meant subprime. As for proactive credit limit increase, it meant raising the cap on how much someone is allowed to borrow—without getting their permission to raise the cap.

      The emails we used to send these “Mainstreet pCLIP” customers would go as follows: “Elena Botella, you’re a valued customer, and we want you to get more out of your card. So recently, your credit line was increased to $6550.00. This gives you more in your wallet, which gives you more flexibility. Thank you for choosing Capital One®. Enjoy your higher credit line.”

      At any bank, if you have a low credit score, you’re only likely to get a credit limit increase if you’re getting close to your existing credit limit. So if you got that email, you probably had a few thousand dollars of Capital One credit card debt at an interest rate of at least 20 percent. That implies you were probably paying Capital One around $40 in interest per month or more. You might want or need to borrow more money on top of what you’ve already borrowed, but I always thought it was a little bit sick for us to be telling people to “enjoy” their higher credit line. It felt more than a little like shouting, “Enjoy getting into more debt, suckers!” before disappearing in a cloud of smoke and speeding off in a Tesla.

      Capital One’s culture of experimentation also acted as a kind of buffer. Fast Company has reported that Capital One runs 80,000 experiments per year. As Christopher Worley and Edward Lawler III explain in the journal Organizational Dynamics, a bank like Capital One can randomly assign differing interest rates, payment options, or rewards to various customers and see which combinations are most profitable for any given segment of people. It’s not so different from how a pharmaceutical company might use a randomized control trial to test whether a new drug is effective, except that the results of the bank’s experiment will never get published, and instead of curing diseases, the bank is trying to extract more money from each customer. The use of experiments is itself an act of psychological distancing; it allows the analysts controlling the experiment to resolutely apply its findings as a profit-maximizing mandate without giving the strategy a name such as, oh, “predatory lending.”

      The rise of data science, machine learning, and artificial intelligence means that you don’t need venal corporate tycoons wearing Monopoly Man hats to grind the faces of the poor into the dirt. Under the data-driven directives of Capitalism 2.0, you can have a bunch of friendly data scientists who don’t think too deeply about the models they’re building, while tutoring low-income kids on the side. As far as they’re concerned, they’re refining a bunch of computer algorithms.

    1. The magic word you should use more:

      Want to learn one magic word that will immediately make year writing better? Meanwhile. Why? Most people, when they string thoughts and ideas together, rely on joining words like “so”, “then”, “therefore”, “however”, or “except”. There’s nothing wrong with them, but what they do is establish a chain of thinking that goes, “A, then B, then C, then D.” It’s linear. Even counterfactual joining words like “however”, “but”, “nevertheless”, even though they establish opposition, are still doing so in a one-track fashion.

      Meanwhile does something else. It establishes parallel tracks of thought. A, therefore B. Meanwhile, C, yet D is a more powerful way to communicate complex ideas than one-track linear writing. When the punchline eventually comes, and those lines of thought collide into something interesting, you can make a better point than if you only had one track to work with.

      Just write more:

      A pottery teacher has two students. On Monday he tells the first student: “Your job this week is to try to create one perfect pot. Spend as much time as you need. Make it perfect.” Then he tells the second student: “Your job this week is to make as many pots as possible. I don’t care if they’re nice. Crank ‘em out.” Then on Friday, he comes back. What does he find?

      Not only has the second student produced hundreds more pots than the first student (who’s laboured over his one shot at glory); every single one of her pots is better. The way you learn how to make a perfect pot is by making a lot of pots. Period.

      Go make some pots.

    1. From the eponymous Dunning of the Dunning-Kruger effect

      In our work, we ask survey respondents if they are familiar with certain technical concepts from physics, biology, politics, and geography. A fair number claim familiarity with genuine terms like centripetal force and photon. But interestingly, they also claim some familiarity with concepts that are entirely made up, such as the plates of parallax, ultra-lipid, and cholarine. In one study, roughly 90 percent claimed some knowledge of at least one of the nine fictitious concepts we asked them about. In fact, the more well versed respondents considered themselves in a general topic, the more familiarity they claimed with the meaningless terms associated with it in the survey.

      An ignorant mind is precisely not a spotless, empty vessel, but one that’s filled with the clutter of irrelevant or misleading life experiences, theories, facts, intuitions, strategies, algorithms, heuristics, metaphors, and hunches that regrettably have the look and feel of useful and accurate knowledge. This clutter is an unfortunate by-product of one of our greatest strengths as a species. We are unbridled pattern recognizers and profligate theorizers. Often, our theories are good enough to get us through the day, or at least to an age when we can procreate. But our genius for creative storytelling, combined with our inability to detect our own ignorance, can sometimes lead to situations that are embarrassing, unfortunate, or downright dangerous—especially in a technologically advanced, complex democratic society that occasionally invests mistaken popular beliefs with immense destructive power (See: crisis, financial; war, Iraq). As the humorist Josh Billings once put it, “It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.”

      The way we traditionally conceive of ignorance—as an absence of knowledge—leads us to think of education as its natural antidote. But education, even when done skillfully, can produce illusory confidence. Here’s a particularly frightful example: Driver’s education courses, particularly those aimed at handling emergency maneuvers, tend to increase, rather than decrease, accident rates. They do so because training people to handle, say, snow and ice leaves them with the lasting impression that they’re permanent experts on the subject. In fact, their skills usually erode rapidly after they leave the course. And so, months or even decades later, they have confidence but little leftover competence when their wheels begin to spin.

      In these Wild West settings, it’s best not to repeat common misbeliefs at all. Telling people that Barack Obama is not a Muslim fails to change many people’s minds, because they frequently remember everything that was said—except for the crucial qualifier “not.” Rather, to successfully eradicate a misbelief requires not only removing the misbelief, but filling the void left behind (“Obama was baptized in 1988 as a member of the United Church of Christ”). If repeating the misbelief is absolutely necessary, researchers have found it helps to provide clear and repeated warnings that the misbelief is false. I repeat, false.

    1. "What if most rich assholes are made, not born?"

      What if the cold-heartedness so often associated with the upper crust—let's call it Rich Asshole Syndrome—isn’t the result of having been raised by a parade of resentful nannies, too many sailing lessons, or repeated caviar overdoses, but the compounded disappointment of being lucky but still feeling unfulfilled? We’re told that those with the most toys are winning, that money represents points on the scoreboard of life. But what if that tired story is just another facet of a scam in which we’re all getting ripped off?

      In New York, I’d developed psychological defenses against the desperation I saw in the streets. I told myself that there were social services for homeless people, that they would just use my money to buy drugs or booze, that they’d probably brought their situation on themselves. But none of that worked with these Indian kids. There were no shelters waiting to receive them. I saw them sleeping in the streets at night, huddled together for warmth, like puppies. They weren’t going to spend my money unwisely. They weren’t even asking for money. They were just staring at my food like the starving creatures they were.

      The social distance separating rich and poor, like so many of the other distances that separate us from each other, only entered human experience after the advent of agriculture and the hierarchical civilizations that followed, which is why it’s so psychologically difficult to twist your soul into a shape that allows you to ignore starving children standing close enough to smell your plate of curry. You’ve got to silence the inner voice calling for justice and for fairness. But we silence this ancient, insistent voice at great cost to our own psychological well-being.

      When volunteers in their studies placed the interests of others before their own, a primitive part of the brain normally associated with food or sex was activated. When researchers measured vagal tone (an indicator of feeling safe and calm) in 74 preschoolers, they found that children who’d donated tokens to help sick kids had much better readings than those who’d kept all their tokens for themselves. Jonas Miller, the lead investigator, said that the findings suggested “we might be wired from a young age to derive a sense of safety from providing care for others.”

      Psychologists Dacher Keltner and Paul Piff monitored intersections with four-way stop signs and found that people in expensive cars were four times more likely to cut in front of other drivers, compared to folks in more modest vehicles. When the researchers posed as pedestrians waiting to cross a street, all the drivers in cheap cars respected their right of way, while those in expensive cars drove right on by 46.2 percent of the time, even when they’d made eye contact with the pedestrians waiting to cross. Other studies by the same team showed that wealthier subjects were more likely to cheat at an array of tasks and games. For example, Keltner reported that wealthier subjects were far more likely to claim they’d won a computer game—even though the game was rigged so that winning was impossible. Wealthy subjects were more likely to lie in negotiations and excuse unethical behavior at work, like lying to clients in order to make more money. When Keltner and Piff left a jar of candy in the entrance to their lab with a sign saying whatever was left over would be given to kids at a nearby school, they found that wealthier people stole more candy from the babies.

      Books such as Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work and The Psychopath Test argue that many traits characteristic of psychopaths are celebrated in business: ruthlessness, a convenient absence of social conscience, a single-minded focus on “success.” But while psychopaths may be ideally suited to some of the most lucrative professions, I’m arguing something different here. It’s not just that heartless people are more likely to become rich. I’m saying that being rich tends to corrode whatever heart you’ve got left. I’m suggesting, in other words, that it’s likely the wealthy subjects who participated in Muscatell’s study learned to be less unsettled by the photos of sick kids by the experience of being rich—much as I learned to ignore starving children in Rajastan so I could comfortably continue my vacation.

      What we’ve been finding across dozens of studies and thousands of participants across this country,” said Piff, “is that as a person’s levels of wealth increase, their feelings of compassion and empathy go down, and their feelings of entitlement, of deservingness, and their ideology of self-interest increases.”

      Institutions seeking to justify a fundamentally anti-human economic system constantly rebroadcast the message that winning the money game will bring satisfaction and happiness. But we’ve got around 300,000 years of ancestral experience telling us it just isn’t so. Selfishness may be essential to civilization, but that only raises the question of whether a civilization so out of step with our evolved nature makes sense for the human beings within it.

    1. Subscription credit lines— a tactic to inflate IRR

      Over the past two years, however, the accuracy of IRR has been called into question thanks to the increasing ubiquity of subscription lines of credit. These loans, also known as commitment facilities, have long been used in the private capital industry to finance transactions before investor capital is called in, easing limited partners’ liquidity needs and making it possible for general partners to jump on deals more quickly. But lately, fund managers have been using subscription credit lines differently — and with greater frequency.

      According to alternatives data provider Preqin, the use of commitment facilities among private equity funds has more than tripled in the past decade, with 47 percent of funds launched in 2010 and later having utilized the financing tool, compared with 13 percent of funds launched before 2010. And it’s not just that more private fund managers are taking out these loans. Preqin also reported that these once short-term instruments are now being used to delay capital calls longer — which investors, researchers, and other industry experts claim is leading to artificially inflated IRRs.

      Two recent papers — one from a pair of Carnegie Mellon business school professors, one co-authored by two German researchers with a BlackRock private equity director — have explored the effects of subscription credit lines on IRRs and arrived at the conclusion that the loans have meaningfully improved IRRs without increasing the actual amount of money that investors take home.

      The German researchers, Pierre Schillinger and Reiner Braun of the Technical University of Munich, worked with BlackRock Private Equity Partners director Jeroen Cornel to simulate how real buyout funds would perform if they had hypothetically used subscription credit lines. Simulating commitment facility use for less than six months resulted in only a 47-basis-point increase in IRR on average, or a 20bp improvement at the median. But increasing the time frame of the loan to a year led to an average IRR bump of 120 basis points — a median increase of 57bp.

      “If used extensively, [subscription credit lines] can indeed lift fund returns substantially,” they concluded.

    1. Quite long but plenty of amazing advice in here from the founders of Looker (acquired by Google)

      “My biggest piece of advice to early-stage founders on fundraising is don't try to raise money too early,” says Tabb. “I see so many founders out there trying to raise with just an idea on a slide. We waited almost a year to raise money, until we knew it was a venture business — not every startup is, and you don’t want to get locked in. We were cranking along with customers and revenue. And it wasn’t all nailed down, but we had figured out enough of how go-to-market might work to know that it was workable. That made our seed raise in the summer of 2012 so much easier. If you build value, it takes the fundraising process from how good you are at pitching yourself to a place where you can simply say ‘Ask the people who are using us for their opinion about it.’”

      As the investor on the receiving end of that fundraising tactic, Trenchard agrees that it was effective. “When we were deciding whether or not to invest in their seed round, Lloyd sent me a list of 10 customer references — many of them were First Round-backed companies. I talked to each and every one during diligence, and I was blown away. The love they had for the products was off the charts, they would have been very disappointed without it,” says Trenchard.

      Learning a new language. “I created LookML to serve as the basis of our platform. It’s an abstraction layer, the sequel to SQL. My thought was that if we could simplify the problems with SQL and evolve the data language, it would be easier to use,” says Tabb. But banking on data analysts learning a new language was anything but a surefire move. “This was a scary one,” says Porterfield. “I remember those early existential questions: ‘Can analysts learn this language? Will they want to?’ Looking back now, it seems more obvious that developer-style tooling and workflows would be embraced. These days, there’s a lot of discussion that any time you can provide tools that increase someone’s leverage, they will adopt them. But that wasn’t clear at the time.”

      “For most companies in the data space, pre-sales folks are like plumbers, they're just hooking stuff together. We tried to take a different approach at Looker by asking prospects for a dataset and then putting economics or math majors to work. In the early days, they wore all the hats: They were pre-sales, post-sales, customer support. Eventually, those became separate roles as we scaled,” says Bien.

      “In the early days, Margaret had a habit of saying ‘We'll be successful when we have 1,000 true fans.’ That was our driving force — figuring out how to build a fanbase in enterprise software,” says Tabb. “If you make a product that customers love, your customers will love you back. It may seem cheesy, but it was really about love — that’s the emotion we wanted to evoke in our customers. We call customer success our ‘Department of Customer Love.’ We made ‘Love Looker Love’ one of our values. I had early customers tell me that life at their company was now divided into two eras: ‘Before Looker’ and ‘After Looker.’ That’s the reaction we were always chasing,” he says.

      “Back in my college days, I was really into the ideas of Robert Greenleaf, who kicked off the concept of servant leadership. Today, as a CEO, that philosophy carries forward — I view myself as a steward,” says Bien. “My role is to remove obstacles for other people and remove ownership for myself.”

    1. Technologies are not simply objects but architectures that organize our bodies in space and time.

      New technologies require us to develop new literacies. By developing such literacies, we train our bodies into habitual choreographies. When you learn to write, you are learning not just symbols but the hand motions that turn lines into letters. When you learn to type, you tether your hands to a keyboard, defining your motions in ways that have neurological and physiological effects. Research shows that writing in print, in cursive, or by typing are each associated with distinct brain patterns and significant learning outcomes. How we use our hands profoundly affects how we think.

      Digital interfaces exercise similar demands on our bodies. When you first acquire a smartphone, the interface is clunky. Each interaction feels contrived, each gesture an intrusion on your consciousness. But as you rehearse these movements, they become second nature. Like the alphabets your hands write into existence, each of these gestures has assigned meanings. As you achieve fluency with them, these gestures become units of the communication structure you form with your device. When you reach instinctively for your phone, it only takes a few unconscious flicks of your thumb to navigate past the lock screen and into your web browser or messaging app. At the same time, you attain a fluency particular to that brand—when your fingers know an iPhone, it’s pretty jarring to use a friend’s Galaxy.

    1. Our phones and computers deliver unto each of us a personalized—or rather, algorithm-realized—distillation of headlines, anecdotes, jokes, and photographs. Even the ads we scroll past are not the same as our neighbor’s: a pair of boots has followed me from site to site for weeks. We call this endless, immaterial material a feed, though there’s little sustenance to be found.

      As reading materials—not just books, but newspapers, magazines, and ephemera—proliferated, more recent centuries saw the rise of reading “extensively”: we read these materials once, often quickly, and move on. Birkerts coins his own terms: the deep, devotional practice of “vertical” reading has been supplanted by “horizontal” reading, skimming along the surface. This shift has only accelerated dizzyingly in the time since Engelsing wrote in 1974, since Birkerts wrote in 1994, and since I wrote, yesterday, the paragraph above.

      Horizontal reading rules the day. What I do when I look at Twitter is less akin to reading a book than to the encounter I have with a recipe’s instructions or the fine print of a receipt: I’m taking in information, not enlightenment. It’s a way to pass the time, not to live in it. Reading—real reading, the kind Birkerts makes his impassioned case for—draws on our vertical sensibility, however latent, and “where it does not assume depth, it creates it.”

      We know perfectly well—we remember, even if dimly, the inward state that satisfies more than our itching, clicking fingers—and we know it isn’t here. Here, on the internet, is a nowhere space, a shallow time. It is a flat and impenetrable surface. But with a book, we dive in; we are sucked in; we are immersed, body and soul. “We hold in our hands a way to cut against the momentum of the times,” Birkerts assures. “We can resist the skimming tendency and delve; we can restore, if only for a time, the vanishing assumption of coherence. The beauty of the vertical engagement is that it does not have to argue for itself. It is self-contained, a fulfillment.”

    1. An insight into how social networks work

      Let's begin with two principles: (1)People are status-seeking monkeys, (2) People seek out the most efficient path to maximizing social capital.

      Why do some large social networks suddenly fade away, or lose out to new tiny networks? What ties many of these explanations together is social capital theory. Classic network effects theory [that a network’s utility increases with the number of users who use it] still holds, I’m not discarding it. Instead, let's append some social capital theory. Together, those form the two axes on which I like to analyze social network health. When modeling how successful social networks create a status game worth playing, a useful metaphor is one of the trendiest technologies: cryptocurrency.

      How is a new social network analogous to an ICO?

      (1) Each new social network issues a new form of social capital, a token.

      (2) You must show proof of work to earn the token.

      (3) Over time it becomes harder and harder to mine new tokens on each social network, creating built-in scarcity.

      (4) Many people, especially older folks, scoff at both social networks and cryptocurrencies.

      Perhaps you've read a long and thoughtful response by a random person on Quora or Reddit, or watched YouTube vloggers publishing night after night, or heard about popular Vine stars living in houses together, helping each other shoot and edit 6-second videos. While you can outsource Bitcoin mining to a computer, people still mine for social capital on social networks largely through their own blood, sweat, and tears.

      Almost every social network of note had an early signature proof of work hurdle. For Facebook it was posting some witty text-based status update. For Instagram, it was posting an interesting square photo. For Vine, an entertaining 6-second video. For Twitter, it was writing an amusing bit of text of 140 characters or fewer. Pinterest? Pinning a compelling photo. You can likely derive the proof of work for other networks like Quora and Reddit and Twitch and so on. Successful social networks don't pose trick questions at the start, it’s usually clear what they want from you.

      If you've ever joined one of these social networks early enough, you know that, on a relative basis, getting ahead of others in terms of social capital (followers, likes, etc.) is easier in the early days. Some people who were featured on recommended follower lists in the early days of Twitter have follower counts in the 7-figures, just as early masters of Musical.ly and Vine were accumulated massive and compounding follower counts. The more people who follow you, the more followers you gain because of leaderboards and recommended follower algorithms and other such common discovery mechanisms.

      Young people, with their much higher usage rate on social media, are the most sensitive and attuned demographic to the payback period and ROI on their social media labor. So, for example, young people tend not to like Twitter but do enjoy Instagram.

      It's not that Twitter doesn't dole out the occasional viral supernova; every so often someone composes a tweet that goes over 1K and then 10K likes or retweets (Twitter should allow people to buy a framed print of said tweet with a silver or gold 1K club or 10K club designation to supplement its monetization). But it’s not common, and most tweets are barely seen by anyone at all. Pair that with the fact that young people's bias towards and skill advantage in visual mediums over textual ones and it's not surprising Instagram is their social battleground of preference (video games might be the most lucrative battleground for the young if you broaden your definition of social networks, and that's entirely reasonable, though that arena skews male).

      The gradient of your network's social capital ROI can often govern your market share among different demographics. Young girls flocked to Musical.ly in its early days because they were uniquely good at the lip synch dance routine videos that were its bread and butter. In this age of neverending notifications, heavy social media users are hyper aware of differing status ROI among the apps they use.

      TikTok is an interesting new player in social media because its default feed, For You, relies on a machine learning algorithm to determine what each user sees; the feed of content from by creators you follow, in contrast, is hidden one pane over. If you are new to TikTok and have just uploaded a great video, the selection algorithm promises to distribute your post much more quickly than if you were on sharing it on a network that relies on the size of your following, which most people have to build up over a long period of time. Conversely, if you come up with one great video but the rest of your work is mediocre, you can't count on continued distribution on TikTok since your followers live mostly in a feed driven by the TikTok algorithm, not their follow graph.

      Why copying proof of work is lousy strategy for status-driven networks… Most clones have and will fail. The reason that matching the basic proof of work hurdle of an Status as a Service incumbent fails is that it generally duplicates the status game that already exists. By definition, if the proof of work is the same, you're not really creating a new status ladder game, and so there isn't a real compelling reason to switch when the new network really has no one in it.

      I once wrote about social networks that the network's the thing; that is, the composition of the graph once a social network reaches scale is its most unique quality. Copying some network's feature often isn’t sufficient if you can’t also copy its graph, but if you can apply the feature to some unique graph that you earned some other way, it can be a defensible advantage. Nothing illustrates this better than Facebook's attempts to win back the young from Snapchat by copying some of the network's ephemeral messaging features, or Facebook's attempt to copy TikTok with Lasso, or, well Facebook's attempt to duplicate just about every social app with any traction anywhere. The problem with copying Snapchat is that, well, the reason young people left Facebook for Snapchat was in large part because their parents had invaded Facebook. You don't leave a party with your classmates to go back to one your parents are throwing just because your dad brings in a keg and offer to play beer pong.

      I think the Stories format is a genuine innovation on the social modesty problem of social networks. That is, all but the most egregious showoffs feel squeamish about publishing too much to their followers. Stories, by putting the onus on the viewer to pull that content, allows everyone to publish away guilt-free, without regard for the craft that regular posts demand in the ever escalating game that is life publishing. In a world where algorithmic feeds break up your sequence of posts, Stories also allow gifted creators to create sequential narratives. In the annals of tech, and perhaps the world, the event that created the greatest social capital boom in history was the launch of Facebook's News Feed. Before News Feed, if you were on, say MySpace, or even on a Facebook before News Feed launched, you had to browse around to find all the activity in your network. Only a demographic of a particular age will recall having to click from one profile to another on MySpace while stalking one’s friends. It almost seems comical in hindsight, that we'd impose such a heavy UI burden on social media users. Can you imagine if, to see all the new photos posted in your Instagram network, you had to click through each profile one by one to see if they’d posted any new photos? I feel like my parents talking about how they had to walk miles to grade school through winter snow wearing moccasins of tree bark when I complain about the undue burden of social media browsing before the News Feed, but it truly was a monumental pain in the ass.

      By merging all updates from all the accounts you followed into a single continuous surface and having that serve as the default screen, Facebook News Feed simultaneously increased the efficiency of distribution of new posts and pitted all such posts against each other in what was effectively a single giant attention arena, complete with live updating scoreboards on each post. It was as if the panopticon inverted itself overnight, as if a giant spotlight turned on and suddenly all of us performing on Facebook for approval realized we were all in the same auditorium, on one large, connected infinite stage, singing karaoke to the same audience at the same time.

      It's difficult to overstate what a momentous sea change it was for hundreds of millions, and eventually billions, of humans who had grown up competing for status in small tribes, to suddenly be dropped into a talent show competing against EVERY PERSON THEY HAD EVER MET.

      Incidentally, teens and twenty-somethings, more so than the middle-aged and elderly, tend to juggle more identities. In middle and high school, kids have to maintain an identity among classmates at school, then another identity at home with family. Twenty-somethings craft one identity among coworkers during the day, then another among their friends outside of work. Often those spheres have differing status games, and there is some penalty to merging those identities. Anyone who has ever sent a text meant for their schoolmates to their parents, or emailed a boss or coworker something meant for their happy hour crew knows the treacherous nature of context collapse.

      Add to that this younger generation's preference for and facility with visual communication and it's clearly why the preferred social network of the young is Instagram and the preferred messenger Snapchat, both preferable to Facebook. Instagram because of the ease of creating multiple accounts to match one's portfolio of identities, Snapchat for its best in class ease of visual messaging privately to particular recipients. The expiration of content, whether explicitly executed on Instagram (you can easily kill off a meme account after you've outgrown it, for example), or automatically handled on a service like Snapchat, is a must-have feature for those for whom multiple identity management is a fact of life.

      Many types of social capital have qualities which render them fragile. Status relies on coordinated consensus to define the scarcity that determines its value. Consensus can shift in an instant. Recall the friend in Swingers, who, at every crowded LA party, quips, "This place is dead anyway." Or recall the wise words of noted sociologist Groucho Marx: "I don't care to belong to any club that will have me as a member."

      The Groucho Marx effect doesn't take effect immediately. In the beginning, a status hierarchy requires lower status people to join so that the higher status people have a sense of just how far above the masses they reside. It's silly to order bottle service at Hakkasan in Las Vegas if no one is sitting on the opposite side of the velvet ropes; a leaderboard with just a single high score is meaningless.

      Snapchat— Snapchat opens to a camera. If you want to text someone, it's extra work to swipe to the left pane to reach the text messaging screen. Remember Snapchat's original Best Friends list? I'm going to guess many of my readers don't, because, as noted earlier, old people probably didn't play that status game, if they'd even figured out how to use Snapchat by that point. This was just about as pure a status game feature as could be engineered for teens. Not only did it show the top three people you Snapped with most frequently, you could look at who the top three best friends were for any of your contacts. Essentially, it made the hierarchy of everyone's “friendships” public, making the popularity scoreboard explicit.

      As with aggregate follower counts and likes, the Best Friends list was a mechanism for people to accumulate a very specific form of social capital. From a platform perspective, however, there's a big problem with this feature: each user could only have one best friend. It put an artificial ceiling on the amount of social capital one could compete for and accumulate. In a clever move to unbound social capital accumulation and to turn a zero-sum game into a positive sum game, broadening the number of users working hard or engaging, Snapchat deprecated the very popular Best Friends list and replaced it with streaks.

      Social Arbitrage— Because social networks often attract different audiences, and because the configuration of graphs even when there are overlapping users often differ, opportunities exist to arbitrage social capital across apps. A prominent user of this tactic was @thefatjewish, the popular Instagram account (his real name was Josh Ostrovsky). He accumulated millions of followers on Instagram in large part by taking other people's jokes from Twitter and other social networks and then posting them as his own on Instagram. Not only did he rack up followers and likes by the millions, he even got signed with CAA! When he got called on it, he claimed it wasn't what he was about. He said, "Again, Instagram is just part of a larger thing I do. I have an army of interns working out of the back of a nail salon in Queens. We have so much stuff going on: I'm writing a book, I've got rosé. I need them to bathe me. I've got so many other things that I need them to do. It just didn't seem like something that was extremely dire." Which is really a long, bizarre way of saying, you caught me. Let he who does not have an army of interns bathing them throw the first stone.

    1. Acton's $850M moral stand and the $122mn fine for deliberately lying to the EU Competition Commission

      Under pressure from Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg to monetize WhatsApp, he pushed back as Facebook questioned the encryption he'd helped build and laid the groundwork to show targeted ads and facilitate commercial messaging. Acton also walked away from Facebook a year before his final tranche of stock grants vested. “It was like, okay, well, you want to do these things I don’t want to do,” Acton says. “It’s better if I get out of your way. And I did.” It was perhaps the most expensive moral stand in history. Acton took a screenshot of the stock price on his way out the door—the decision cost him $850 million.

      Despite a transfer of several billion dollars, Acton says he never developed a rapport with Zuckerberg. “I couldn’t tell you much about the guy,” he says. In one of their dozen or so meetings, Zuck told Acton unromantically that WhatsApp, which had a stipulated degree of autonomy within the Facebook universe and continued to operate for a while out of its original offices, was “a product group to him, like Instagram.”

      For his part, Acton had proposed monetizing WhatsApp through a metered-user model, charging, say, a tenth of a penny after a certain large number of free messages were used up. “You build it once, it runs everywhere in every country,” Acton says. “You don’t need a sophisticated sales force. It’s a very simple business.”

      Acton’s plan was shot down by Sandberg. “Her words were ‘It won’t scale.’ ”

      “I called her out one time,” says Acton, who sensed there might be greed at play. “I was like, ‘No, you don’t mean that it won’t scale. You mean it won’t make as much money as . . . ,’ and she kind of hemmed and hawed a little. And we moved on. I think I made my point. . . . They are businesspeople, they are good businesspeople. They just represent a set of business practices, principles and ethics, and policies that I don’t necessarily agree with.”

      Questioning Zuckerberg’s true intentions wasn’t easy when he was offering what became $22 billion. “He came with a large sum of money and made us an offer we couldn’t refuse,” Acton says. The Facebook founder also promised Koum a board seat, showered the founders with admiration and, according to a source who took part in discussions, told them that they would have “zero pressure” on monetization for the next five years... Internally, Facebook had targeted a $10 billion revenue run rate within five years of monetization, but such numbers sounded too high to Acton—and reliant on advertising.

      T he warning signs emerged before the deal even closed that November. The deal needed to get past Europe’s famously strict antitrust officials, and Facebook prepared Acton to meet with around a dozen representatives of the European Competition Commission in a teleconference. “I was coached to explain that it would be really difficult to merge or blend data between the two systems,” Acton says. He told the regulators as much, adding that he and Koum had no desire to do so.

      Later he learned that elsewhere in Facebook, there were “plans and technologies to blend data.” Specifically, Facebook could use the 128-bit string of numbers assigned to each phone as a kind of bridge between accounts. The other method was phone-number matching, or pinpointing Facebook accounts with phone numbers and matching them to WhatsApp accounts with the same phone number.

      Within 18 months, a new WhatsApp terms of service linked the accounts and made Acton look like a liar. “I think everyone was gambling because they thought that the EU might have forgotten because enough time had passed.” No such luck: Facebook wound up paying a $122 million fine for giving “incorrect or misleading information” to the EU—a cost of doing business, as the deal got done and such linking continues today (though not yet in Europe). “The errors we made in our 2014 filings were not intentional," says a Facebook spokesman.

      Acton had left a management position on Yahoo’s ad division over a decade earlier with frustrations at the Web portal’s so-called “Nascar approach” of putting ad banners all over a Web page. The drive for revenue at the expense of a good product experience “gave me a bad taste in my mouth,” Acton remembers. He was now seeing history repeat. “This is what I hated about Facebook and what I also hated about Yahoo,” Acton says. “If it made us a buck, we’d do it.” In other words, it was time to go.

    1. Taken from a graduation address delivered at West Point, which is just so good and worth quoting many sections of at length

      That’s really the great mystery about bureaucracies. Why is it so often that the best people are stuck in the middle and the people who are running things—the leaders—are the mediocrities? Because excellence isn’t usually what gets you up the greasy pole. What gets you up is a talent for maneuvering. Kissing up to the people above you, kicking down to the people below you. Pleasing your teachers, pleasing your superiors, picking a powerful mentor and riding his coattails until it’s time to stab him in the back. Jumping through hoops. Getting along by going along. Being whatever other people want you to be, so that it finally comes to seem that, like the manager of the Central Station, you have nothing inside you at all. Not taking stupid risks like trying to change how things are done or question why they’re done. Just keeping the routine going.

      We have a crisis of leadership in America because our overwhelming power and wealth, earned under earlier generations of leaders, made us complacent, and for too long we have been training leaders who only know how to keep the routine going. Who can answer questions, but don’t know how to ask them. Who can fulfill goals, but don’t know how to set them. Who think about how to get things done, but not whether they’re worth doing in the first place. What we have now are the greatest technocrats the world has ever seen, people who have been trained to be incredibly good at one specific thing, but who have no interest in anything beyond their area of exper­tise. What we don’t have are leaders.

      What we don’t have, in other words, are thinkers. People who can think for themselves. People who can formulate a new direction: for the country, for a corporation or a college, for the Army—a new way of doing things, a new way of looking at things. People, in other words, with vision.

      That’s the first half of the lecture: the idea that true leadership means being able to think for yourself and act on your convictions. But how do you learn to do that? How do you learn to think? Let’s start with how you don’t learn to think. A study by a team of researchers at Stanford came out a couple of months ago. The investigators wanted to figure out how today’s college students were able to multitask so much more effectively than adults. How do they manage to do it, the researchers asked? The answer, they discovered—and this is by no means what they expected—is that they don’t. The enhanced cognitive abilities the investigators expected to find, the mental faculties that enable people to multitask effectively, were simply not there. In other words, people do not multitask effectively. And here’s the really surprising finding: the more people multitask, the worse they are, not just at other mental abilities, but at multitasking itself.

      One thing that made the study different from others is that the researchers didn’t test people’s cognitive functions while they were multitasking. They separated the subject group into high multitaskers and low multitaskers and used a different set of tests to measure the kinds of cognitive abilities involved in multitasking. They found that in every case the high multitaskers scored worse. They were worse at distinguishing between relevant and irrelevant information and ignoring the latter. In other words, they were more distractible. They were worse at what you might call “mental filing”: keeping information in the right conceptual boxes and being able to retrieve it quickly. In other words, their minds were more disorganized. And they were even worse at the very thing that defines multitasking itself: switching between tasks.

      Concentrating, focusing. You can just as easily consider this lecture to be about concentration as about solitude. Think about what the word means. It means gathering yourself together into a single point rather than letting yourself be dispersed everywhere into a cloud of electronic and social input. It seems to me that Facebook and Twitter and YouTube—and just so you don’t think this is a generational thing, TV and radio and magazines and even newspapers, too—are all ultimately just an elaborate excuse to run away from yourself. To avoid the difficult and troubling questions that being human throws in your way. Am I doing the right thing with my life? Do I believe the things I was taught as a child? What do the words I live by—words like duty, honor, and country—really mean? Am I happy?

      So it’s perfectly natural to have doubts, or questions, or even just difficulties. The question is, what do you do with them? Do you suppress them, do you distract yourself from them, do you pretend they don’t exist? Or do you confront them directly, honestly, courageously? If you decide to do so, you will find that the answers to these dilemmas are not to be found on Twitter or Comedy Central or even in The New York Times. They can only be found within—without distractions, without peer pressure, in solitude.

      “Your own reality—for yourself, not for others.” Thinking for yourself means finding yourself, finding your own reality. Here’s the other problem with Facebook and Twitter and even The New York Times. When you expose yourself to those things, especially in the constant way that people do now—older people as well as younger people—you are continuously bombarding yourself with a stream of other people’s thoughts. You are marinating yourself in the conventional wisdom. In other people’s reality: for others, not for yourself. You are creating a cacophony in which it is impossible to hear your own voice, whether it’s yourself you’re thinking about or anything else. That’s what Emerson meant when he said that “he who should inspire and lead his race must be defended from travelling with the souls of other men, from living, breathing, reading, and writing in the daily, time-worn yoke of their opinions.” Notice that he uses the word lead. Leadership means finding a new direction, not simply putting yourself at the front of the herd that’s heading toward the cliff.

      So solitude can mean introspection, it can mean the concentration of focused work, and it can mean sustained reading. All of these help you to know yourself better. But there’s one more thing I’m going to include as a form of solitude, and it will seem counterintuitive: friendship. Of course friendship is the opposite of solitude; it means being with other people. But I’m talking about one kind of friendship in particular, the deep friendship of intimate conversation. Long, uninterrupted talk with one other person. Not Skyping with three people and texting with two others at the same time while you hang out in a friend’s room listening to music and studying. That’s what Emerson meant when he said that “the soul environs itself with friends, that it may enter into a grander self-acquaintance or solitude.”

      Introspection means talking to yourself, and one of the best ways of talking to yourself is by talking to another person. One other person you can trust, one other person to whom you can unfold your soul. One other person you feel safe enough with to allow you to acknowledge things—to acknowledge things to yourself—that you otherwise can’t. Doubts you aren’t supposed to have, questions you aren’t supposed to ask. Feelings or opinions that would get you laughed at by the group or reprimanded by the authorities.

      This is what we call thinking out loud, discovering what you believe in the course of articulating it. But it takes just as much time and just as much patience as solitude in the strict sense. And our new electronic world has disrupted it just as violently. Instead of having one or two true friends that we can sit and talk to for three hours at a time, we have 968 “friends” that we never actually talk to; instead we just bounce one-line messages off them a hundred times a day. This is not friendship, this is distraction.

    1. I think we’re just starting to lose a little bit of our sense of country and our sense of rights.”

      i wonder how much she actually believes this vs is using it as an excuse. i'd imagine the majority of people who are using this argument have some inkling deep down that's it's a logical fallacy, albeit one that they don't want to face

    2. Arizona state Rep. Anthony Kern (R) and Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt (R) both tweeted (and deleted) defiant photos from crowded restaurants. “We can’t all just shut ourselves and stay home,” Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. “The economy has to move forward.”

      not to over generalize, but i don't think it's a coincidence that every senator who talked about this was right leaning

    1. Where blind skyscrapers useTheir full height to proclaimThe strength of Collective Man,

      I love these lines by Auden! I think he is trying to point out how our buildings, and skyscrapers specifically reveal the strength of humanity. Architecture is something that varies so much between cultures. The more grand buildings we make, the higher our towers climb, the more value we put in our strength as a nation. Our buildings are not for us to see but for other countries to look at in awe of our power. This is mostly futile as Auden points out. It's just one big competition between countries, with little regard for the people actually constructing the masterpieces.

    1. if you're using the GNU version of find, the texinfo page for find has a more detailed explanation than its manpage (as is true for most GNU utilities).

      This is unfortunate because I (and I assume most users) don't know how to or aren't in the habit of accessing the info page. We're more in the habit of just doing man command. It's confusing that there are 2 separate manuals. It seems like it would be better to just everything in the man page. But maybe that would be too big to put in a single "page". Git (for example) circumvents that issue by having separate man pages for each subcommand (like man git log).

    1. Casca Indeed he is not fit. Decius Brutus Shall no man else be touched but only Caesar? Cassius CassiusThen leave him out.CascaIndeed, he's not a good fit.Decius BrutusAre we just going after Caesar?CassiusGood question Decius. I don't think it's a good idea for Mark Antony, who is so beloved by Caesar, should be left alive. You'll find him a cunning strategist, and if he builds up his power, it may grow so much as to harm all of us. To prevent this, let's kill Caesar and Antony together.Decius, well urged.  I think it is not meet, Mark Antony, so well beloved of Caesar, Should outlive Caesar.  We shall find of him A shrewd contriver; and, you know, his means, If he improve them, may well stretch so far As to annoy us all; which to prevent, Let Antony and Caesar fall together.

      When I was reading this I was using the word bubble whenever I needed it. This was one of the moments that I used it to help me understand what this was saying and that it was telling me that Cassius , Casca, and Brutus were going after Caesar and to also kill Antony when they killed Caesar.

    2. It is the bright day that brings forth the adder, And that craves wary walking

      The Metaphor button, (I couldn't highlight the text in that bubble, so I'll just highlight this) helped me understand the context behind this part, as it helped me think "oh it's not just a normal day, it's a 'time of peace following the end of the civil war.'"

    1. And in the same way the dan;lelion's destruction tells us about ourselves, so does our own destruction: our bodies are' ecosystems, and they shed and replace and repair until we die. And when we die, our bodies feed the hungry earth, our cells becoming part of other cells, and in the world of the living, where we used to be, people kiss and hold hands and fall in love and fuck and laugh and cry and hurt others and nurse broken hearts and start wars and pull sleeping children out of car seats and shout at each other.

      She is comparing the human body with a flower. She states that the dandelion can tell a lot about a person just by looking at how they live, dies, and what happens after it's gone. She starts this by stating how the human body is made, which is similar to how a flower is made. But the only difference is that the flower doesn't have to take care of it's child. Or even experience pain and hardships. Instead, the flower is represented as the first stages of being born for human. We are created in the beginning and slowly die as we get older.

    2. The abused woman has certainly been around as long as human beings have been capable of psychological manipulation and interpersonal violence, but as a generally understood concept it-and she-did not exist until about fifty years ago. The conversa~ion about domestic abuse within queer communities is even newer, and even more shadowed. As we consider the forms intimate violence takes today, each new concept-the male victim, the female perpetrator, queer abusers, and the queer abused-reveals itself as another ghost that has always been here, haunting the ruler's house.

      I thought this was an extremely interesting and important point. Speaking honestly, when I hear the term domestic abuse I don't think I have ever thought of it in the context of a same-sex relationship. It certainly does exist, I think it just gets easily dismissed and there's not enough information about it out there. When two women fight it's sometimes called a "cat fight" which diminishes the severity of the situation. I think that's something that also happens in these domestic violence situations with same-sex partners, it gets labeled as something other and is ultimately downplayed. Also something that was mentioned was the male victim, and the female perpetrator. It's relevant to the Junot Diaz book we just read in which this was the case with Miss Lora and Yunior. Some people would not see it that way just because it's been instilled into us that men are always perpetrators and women are always the victims. It prevents victims from speaking out and getting the help that they need. Overall, I do feel that the author is right and that there needs to be more education on these topics, and in turn more support for those who are victims to abuse.