10,000 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2021
    1. It’s just hard to shake the feeling that some of Endgame’s predecessors existed primarily to goose anticipation for this latest astronomically grossing MCU event. (It’s an effective strategy for getting people to fill in their personal MCU blanks — in particular, Endgame cleverly makes Thor: The Dark World feel more essential than it ever was before.) Some fans claim that any lack of connectivity is the problem with, say, Age of Ultron, as compared to the newer Avengers movies: it isn’t smooth or assured enough in moving along the series’ master plot. Others will claim to have been waiting 11 years for Endgame.

      A third criticism of the way franchises commercialize movies: movies leading up to Endgame existed primarily for its anticipation.

    1. Climate change is linked with racism, genocide, patriarchy and other such systemic oppressions that have unfolded over centuries. We’re facing many other crises like the biodiversity crisis, a food crisis, an unemployment crisis, and right now a pandemic which is also a result of the way we treat the earth.

      This is very scary but accurate. Understanding that the issue of climate change is not simply black and white, but rather that it intersects with other socioeconomic issues shows just how important it is that we prioritize change. It's not as simple as changing the physical environment.

    1. In the images that display burned and muti- lated black bodies set off by crowds of curious-even smiling-white specta- tors

      Vasquez states "After Reconstruction, journalists didn’t just cover lynchings—publishing uncritical accounts of racialized terror alongside photos of hanging Black bodies—it condoned and encouraged this terrorism." And I agree because when other white supremacists see photos like this they just feel powerful. It would really encourage more of this violence to occur because they are seeing their peers enjoying the act in these photographs. It's sickening, really.

    2. Du Bois's images of white-looking African Americans resonate powerful- ly with the literary image of the "tragic mulatto"

      I think this is a statement that stuck with me because being biracial was so frowned upon back then, when now it's almost celebrated when it comes to the media and such (Although I know that in many families biracial children are still not accepted and even in the black community it's just a big discourse with lightskin v. darkskin.) It's just so eyeopening to see that it was such a powerful move to add them in these photographs

    3. Many white supremacists argued that African American criminal behavior had increased dramatically during the postbellum era, and sug- gested that newly emancipated blacks were reverting to their "natural" state of inferiorit

      Aha! This is something I truly had to sit and think about because isn't it funny how it's almost like second nature to just comply or not get "too loud" in certain situation because we do not want to feed into stereotypes or have them call us "angry black people." I never thought this was something that dated so far back. And of course white supremacists would point it out.

    1. With much angry gesturing, an Italian manager referred to the idea of his Dutch counterpart as “crazy.” The Dutch manager replied. “What do you mean, crazy? I’ve considered all the factors, and I think this is a viable approach. And calm down! We need to analyze this, not get sidetracked by emotional theatrics.” At that point, the Italian walked out of the meeting. In international business dealings, reason and emotion both play a role. Which of these dominates depends upon whether we are affective (readily showing emotions) or emotionally neutral in our approach. Members of neutral cultures do not telegraph their feelings, but keep them carefully controlled and subdued. In cultures with high affect, people show their feelings plainly by laughing, smiling, grimacing, scowling – and sometimes crying, shouting, or walking out of the room. This doesn’t mean that people in neutral cultures are cold or unfeeling. But in the course of normal business activities, neutral cultures are more careful to monitor the amount of emotion they display. Research conducted with people who were upset about something at work, noted that only some cultures supported expressing those feelings openly. Emotional reactions were found to be least acceptable in Japan, Indonesia, the U.K., Norway and the Netherlands – and most accepted in Italy, France, the U.S. and Singapore. It’s easy for people from neutral cultures to sympathize with the Dutch manager and his frustration over trying to reason with “that excitable Italian.” After all, an idea either works or it doesn’t work – and the way to test the validity of an idea is through trial and observation. That just makes sense – doesn’t it? Well, not necessarily to the Italian who felt the issue was deeply personal, and who viewed any “rational argument” as totally irrelevant!

      Our text doesn't give opposing terms for the emotion display rules, but these examples may help you understand the concept better.

    1. Therefore, the transition to the true vacuum must be stimulated by the creation of high-energy particles

      No cite given. The Higgs particle can't stimulate a false vacuum collapse, common misunderstanding.

      Passage added by an editor who doesn't normally edit on science in 2015 and not changed since then.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=False_vacuum&diff=prev&oldid=646646651

      The universe currently doesn't have particles hot enough to stimulate a false vacuum decay without quantum tunnelling. It might have been possible in the early universe with a reheat temperature with particles with energies of 10^16 GeV.

      In this diagram, the blue dashed line shows a reheat temperature of 10^16 GeV in that first tiny fraction of a microsecond of the universe, which would be enough to get the universe within the range of uncertainty of the universe's state possibly without quantum tunnelling

      Caption:

      : The blue dashed line shows the instability bound (5.62) obtained by taking the thermal history of the Universe into account (Delle Rose et al., 2016) and assuming a high reheat temperature TRH=1016 GeV. For lower reheat temperatures, the instability bound becomes weaker, and approaches the red dotted line as TRH → 0.

      Cosmological Aspects of Higgs Vacuum Metastability

      A Higgs particle doesn't do anything.

      That's a bit like confusing a photon with a magnet.

      Both are related to the electromagnetic field but totally different things.

      It is the Higgs field itself that quantum tunnels.

      Not the Higgs particle.

      The Higgs particle gave evidence that the Higgs field existed.

      If we had very advanced understanding of physics but no magnet, then conceivably by observing photons we might deduce the possibility of magnets. It's like that.

      It proved that the Higgs field exists, at least if it is the Higgs. Originally there were some questions about whether it really was a Higgs particle eventually they are sure it is. That's like observing a photon and deducing that the electromagnetic field exists (though you'd probably need more data than just a photon to deduce the details of the electromagnetic field).

      But just as for a photon and the electromagnetic field, it only tells us a bit about the Higgs field and that's why they look closely at interactions of various other particles like the Top quark that are influenced by the Higgs field to find out more about it.

      Alternatively, they may be confusing with the energy needed to push it over the hump instead of tunnel through and if so energies needed are so high they only existed in the early universe and don't exist anywhere anymore.

  2. luky-my.sharepoint.com luky-my.sharepoint.com
    1. This means you know the “literal” meaning of the text.

      No room for annotation/ interpretation and for different forms of literacy engagement to happen here. Just as someone mentioned previously that when you take the ACT, the school teaches not to interpret, just find the answer. While it's correct in a school context, it really teaches bad lessons about learning and really reading.

    1. privacy invasion

      I think that just having a social media account or owning a smartphone removes the walls of privacy. While it's uncomfortable to think of the deep invasions of privacy that have been taking place in recent years (as seen through extremely targeted ads) I think people should just expect that part of the social contract of having social media means having little to no privacy online. For instance, aside from obvious reasons, I laughed at the notion that "the vaccine will microchip people" and thought it was insanely naive as our phones essentially serve as a microchip, already. It's strange to me that there was huge concern over a microchip tracking people through a vaccine but that there is minimal concern by society and media about the huge invasions of privacy that's been happening for years through our phones and why there's been little to no push (when compared to other issues & initiatives) to implement policy or reform to limit it.

    1. No one definition has as yet satisfied all naturalists; yet every naturalist knows vaguely what he means when he speaks of a species.

      I have found that humans love to place things into categories, but as a whole, we cannot agree on how to do so. It fascinates me how this is a trait that is nearly universally human. Before the proper technologies were created to show that two animals were genetically different species, the system of species categorization mainly depended on morphology, not phylogenies. It's just very interesting to consider how science used to be compared to what the scientific community knows today! However, our ideas in science today are not all that new; in only about 100 years, so much has changed and developed. It's excited to know that every day science is evolving just like the species on this Earth are!

    1. Barnroe/1 throros ojf his mask, runs to him, and, kneeling /Jy him, raises 1111d ,hafts him.

      With the importance of contracts in the merchant class, this moment in the play is especially pivotal. It's here that we witness a break in contract. For these merchant characters and within this sentimental genre, a contract goes beyond just economic agreement; for they hold an emotional tie as well. The moment that Barnwell chooses to murder his Uncle, he ends his contractual duties working for him, but more importantly -- especially to this genre-- he chooses to break their emotional bond as well. While the play highlights an abundance of contracts happening between different characters, this moment stood out to me because it is the biggest moment that goes against that theme. Thus, the truest representation of immoral behavior that Barnwell displays, the clearest moment we see him go against all he knows and all that's good.

    2. What advan­tage have you made of his death ? or what ad­vantage may yet be made of it ? Did you secure 35 the keys of his treasure-those no doubt were about him. What gold, what jewels, or what else of value have you brought me ?

      This dialogue from Millwood to Barnwell is a perfect representation of the transactional, clinical lens with which she views their relationship. Her use of nouns such as “advantage” and “value” (which have deep monetary associations ) contrast with the deeply upset state of her so-called “lover” and so clearly indicate how she places personal gain above any pain felt by anyone else around her. This goal-oriented way of thinking is more reminscient of an exchange or business deal than of a functional relationship.

      It becomes clear that this callous manner of thinking is something she carries with her throughout her life and not just in her relationship with Barnwell when at the end of ACT IV she expresses that, in her view, people go through life “devour[ing] or [being] devoured as they meet with others weaker or stronger than themselves." Here, her matter of fact tone contrasts with her use of the carnal verb “devour” and so further solidifies to the audience just how deep her tendency to view life as a mere series of emotionless exchanges runs.

      Her callous, transactional way of thinking eventually drives her to being arrested without any sort of redemption in the audience’s eyes. This ties into the larger moral of the play by expressly showing how going through life like it’s a clinical business deal and rejecting your humanity has dire consequences for you and your character.

    1. I use <b>s for the decorative portions of the layout because they’re purely decorative elements. There’s no content to strongly emphasize or to boldface, and semantically a <b> isn’t any better or worse than a <span>. It’s just a hook on which to hang some visual effects. And it’s shorter, so it minimizes page bloat (not that a few characters will make all that much of a difference). More to the point, the <b>’s complete lack of semantic meaning instantly flags it in the markup as being intentionally non-semantic. It is, in that meta sense, self-documenting.
    1. It’s also much less unethical. Manual labor can be both physically and mentally damaging. Suicide rates are consistently higher in low skilled industrial production, construction, agriculture and mining jobs. They also have the most, sometimes lethal, injuries and in some extreme cases lead to child labor and borderline slavery.

      This paragraph from the original post is what I would describe as a false-faced pathetic appeal: it's clearly an appeal to emotion (making reference to suicide rates, slavery, and child exploitation as it does), but, like many pathetic appeals in our logic-favoring society, it attempts to mask itself and appear as a logical appeal. I would argue that it does a poor job of this, and is thus an ineffective pathetic appeal - a pathetic pathetic appeal, if you would. If, for example, the writer had invested the effort to dig up some statistics to support their claims (faulty or otherwise), their comment would have a better chance of passing as logical. They did not, and so their pathetic appeal is plainly just a cheap play on emotions that crumbles quickly under scrutiny. Reddit being the sort of website that it is, where people will pick you apart for any lapse in reasoning, this is a serious mistake.

    1. m. Each sid e pr es en te dst at ist ic s that just ified it s polic y reco mme nda ti ons , and ea chcr iti ci zed the oth er ’s

      that's why it's so annoying when conservative debate points revolve around statistics

    Annotators

    1. Problem: “I really hate reading. I’ve found I can skip the readings, read the Sparks Notes, and get by just fine.”Suggestions: First, if you aren’t familiar with Sparks Notes, it’s an online site that provides

      I tend to skip through a lot. You can get by with Spark Notes and get the basic idea, but reading is still very important.

    1. To act or speak violently out of spite, chauvinism, or self-interest, to impoverish, exploit or deny basic rights to anybody, and to incite hatred by denigrating others—even our enemies—is a denial of our common humanity. We in this class acknowledge that we have failed to live compassionately to some degree.

      This part of the charter, for me, was a little confusing as the end when it said "is a denial to our common humanity". But, I think it's saying that pitting ourselves against each other is just comprising ourselves as a group of people on this earth. I thought this was interesting because usually in society, people are separated. Whether that be based on sex, race, religion, culture, etc. We do not usually see each other as members of humanity but, more members of our own separate groups. I also liked the conclusion of the paragraph which lets the reader know it is okay not to be fully perfect and that we all have made these e mistakes at some point.

    2. Listen attentively and intently (with intention to understand) first, and forming an opinion after you fully understand their point of view

      In many situations, the opposing will form thoughts in their mind without fully comprehending what their peer is saying. It then becomes a "domino" effect. Where one person will say their thoughts and another will jump in without listening to what their peer is saying. At times like this having compassion is very important because not only will it help you understand someone else's thoughts but it will also show an act of kindness. When it comes to thoroughly listening to other's thoughts on a given topic it's really hard for me to sit still and not interrupt. In order to avoid that I learned to write down notes as the speaker talks and then crossing off any of my thoughts that later on are either justified or just aren't valid.

    1. or force of any kind

      Through this excerpt, Adams keeps coming back to “force”. And always highlighting the fact that great men seem to know a force is needed, but do not what force or from where it comes. This is the main frustration of Adams: everyone knows they need to do or know such and such, but no one actually does or knows such and such. They just keep repeating the fact that they need to know it or do it, calling their suppositions knowledge, but no one actually has the answers that Adams is looking for. It’s like what the world has defined as knowledge is simply the charade of knowing things, but Adam’s really wants to know things. And not only learn them but apply them.

    1. “If it’s not worth teaching, it’s not worth teaching well,”

      This brings me back to one of my high school classes- it was a geography class. I could tell right off the bat that it wasn't something that the teacher particularly cared for. It was packets on packets, and lots of movies. I barely remember any of it.

      In contrast, I had a creative writing class in which the teacher genuinely loved their chosen interest. I can look on that fondly, and still remember the teachings.

      There's a difference between classes when one is uncaring and just cares about giving the kids a grade- and the other who genuinely wanted their students to learn and grow.

    1. Can I compete with an African veldt? Can I give a bath and clean the children as efficiently or quickly as the automatic body wash can? I cannot. And it isn’t just me. It’s you. You’ve been awfully nervous lately.”

      Lydia, feels as if everything she does is sub par compared to the machine that takes care of them. I feel this makes Lydia feel useless or empty, as she no longer has anymore tasks to do.

    1. In addition to peers, family members, and people in your immediate school or community, you can use social media to reach out to a wider network of people committed to supporting each other and sharing information about teaching

      It's important to note that just because somebody you know or somebody in a facebook group suggests an article or teaching tool, does not mean that you shouldn't still be critical of its accuracy and reliability. Fake news can spread like wildfire (especially on social media), even if it's coming from the most well-intentioned people.

    1. nobody hiding in the school bathroom

      I can definitely see this as a reference to bullying, my understanding is she wants to go deeper into the idea of things not existing. It's not just money and food, which are essentials to us now, that she refers to, but also issues that maybe aren't the first things that come to mind to the reader.

    1. I look for a couple of threads. One is the combination of ego and humility. Let’s be honest, a lot of C.E.O.s are ego-driven people. But they also have to be humble in some very precise ways around ideas and decisions, and being able to change their mind. That’s an idiosyncratic combination.Another thread is intellectual curiosity. They ask a lot of “why” questions, and they’re comfortable with the ambiguous nature of things that are unknown.The last one is that you want somebody who’s ultra-resilient, because there are just so many trials and tribulations to building a business. One day it can feel like you’re on the top of the world, and the next day it’s all crumbling down. Can you compartmentalize it, put it in context and enjoy it?

      在接受纽约时报采访时,他解释过自己会把钱投给怎样的创业者。

      “首先他要够谦逊,能听得进不同意见;第二他的求知欲必须旺盛,会问许多‘为什么’。最后,他得是一个有着超强韧性的人,因为创业要经历许多磨难,前一天你还在世界之巅,第二天一切的一切却都崩溃了,你能享受这样的生活吗?”

    1. Some call them “digital natives,” a problematic term on multiple counts. But the connotations of native aside, it is true, in my experience, that today’s students exist effortlessly in a digital world of consumption.
      • It only gets more extreme too. I have nieces and have looked after younger kids in the past and it's remarkable for technologically inclined they are. (Technological over-reliance is also a thing, but this comment will ignore that for now). But, I also thing that there's aspects that should be addressed (not that this point has anything to do with what is being said here): 1, while understanding and ability to navigate the "digital world" is increasing--so too is the ability of those who would exploit and abuse that; 2, just because they "younger generation" of my generation down are far more technologically capable, that doesn't necessarily mean they understand it any more than the "older generation" does (which sort of cycles itself back to problem one). It's just something within our skill set, while knowing what and how to use a punched-card isn't. You don't think of it much, but it took time to understand "the ways of the internet" and just "how technology works".
    1. they created amodel system–the ‘studio system’–which other countrieshad to imitate in order to compete. But attempts at imit-ating the American system were only partially successful,and by 1925 it was the ‘Hollywood’ system

      Just how complex is the system that no one ever could’ve copied it?? It’s genius.

    1. he most famous illustration of how the name of a substance is supposed to function in this way is provided not by Kripke, but by Putnam, another leading proponent of the ‘theory of direct reference’. Putnam asks us to imagine a Twin Earth – just like our Earth – which contains doppelgängers of us humans. The only difference between the two Earths is that on Twin Earth the clear, thirst-quenching, etc liquid that fills the oceans, lakes and rivers is not the chemical substance H2O, but another substance – XYZ. Suppose it’s 1750, before the chemical composition of water was discovered. On both Earths, the inhabitants call their liquid ‘water’. And, because it’s 1750, they associate the same mental checklist with that term: both think of ‘water’ as the substance that’s clear, thirst-quenching, boils at 100°C and so on. Now suppose a glass of XYZ is brought from Twin Earth to Earth and presented to Locke. Locke would believe it’s water, because it would tick his mental checklist. But would it be water? Not according to Putnam. Intuitively, that’s merely water-like stuff in the glass, not water. Putnam concludes that, while the term ‘water’ is associated with the same descriptions on Earth and Twin Earth, it has different meanings and picks out different chemical kinds. It is, and was, a necessary condition of something being water that it be H2O, despite this condition not being known back in 1750.
    1. I think this subject is very sad. If I'm doing the best I cant to impress, help, whatever, for someone and they just did not appreciate it, I would be done with them. I don't know why African Americans stayed in the army. But I guess it's a good thing that they did because that's how it became desegregated.

    1. female navigator Helen

      I just think it's funny that she has the role of navigator not only because it's typical that the female characters have the least important or least complex job, but also in the way the female characters are usually used to help guide the male characters to way they need to be in the story, typically in an emotional sense and here she is literally the guide for them.

    1. Formative evaluation

      Formative evaluation is so important to include, and not just as a means to assess the designer's level of creativity or how the learner perceived the content. It can also be used to evaluate the learner's progress and degree of comprehension of the material.

      Furthermore cyclical revisions improve the content for the next cohort of learners, and there's a constant feedback loop that can improver the overall learning experience. It's important not to neglect or overlook the impact that formative evaluations can have.

      When I was in school, I often felt like formative evaluation was not a key priority. The summative evaluations had the most emphasis and consequently received the most attention because they impacted final course grades.

    1. there are charismatic mega-ideas. “Flatten the curve” could be one of them.

      Robinson is drawing a comparison between the idea of "flattening the curve" and charismatic megafauna. People concerned with wildlife conservation use lovable animals like pandas, elephants, etc. as a "poster child" for their cause. It's just a given for many people that they should be protected, thus spurring action from people who may not be as interested in the nitty-gritty scientific details. I think the idea of flattening the curve definitely has a similar effect.

    1. Untrainedadtors,yieldingtoexcitementontheftage,havebeenknowntoftumbleagainftthewingsinimpaffionedexit.Butitisquitepoffibletofeelalltheexcitementofthefituationandyetbeperfectlyfelf-poflefled.Thisisartwhichtheadborwholofeshisheadhasnotmaftered.

      Here Diderot talks about how young and unexperienced actors can become lost in the passion of the work, and often be very over the top or bombastic in their acting. Although I don't think this is entirely true for every young actor, I do agree that when you are young and first beginning you feel the need to show the audience the exactitude of how deep you are "feeling" on stage. This often looks ridiculous and not realistic at all. It's funny to me that this happened in this time period, and not just on bad teen drama's of today's television.

    1. Second, advances in materials and manufacturing were probably necessary for a commercially successful bicycle. It’s a bit hard, from where I stand, to untangle which advances in design were made possible by new materials and techniques, and which were simply sparks of inventive imagination that hadn’t been conceived or developed before. But the fact that people were willing to put up with the precarious high-wheeled design indicates to me that pneumatic tires were crucial. And it’s plausible to me that advanced metalworking was needed to make small, lightweight chains and gears of high and consistent quality, at an acceptable price—and that no other design, such as a belt or lever, would have worked instead. It’s also plausible to me that wooden frames just weren’t light and strong enough to be practical (I certainly wouldn’t be eager to ride a wooden bicycle today).

      其次,材料和制造方面的进步可能是自行车取得商业成功的必要条件。从我的角度来看,很难分清哪些设计上的进步是由新材料和新技术促成的,哪些只是以前从未被构思或开发过的创造性想象力的火花。但事实上,人们愿意忍受危险的高轮设计,在我看来,充气轮胎是至关重要的。在我看来,需要先进的金属加工技术,才能以可接受的价格制造出质量稳定的小型轻质链条和齿轮,而且没有其他设计如皮带或杠杆,能够取而代之。对我来说,木制车架不够轻、不够结实、不够实用也是有道理的。

    1. For a “book” is just the endpoint of a latticework of complex infrastructure, made increasingly accessible. Even if the endpoint stays stubbornly the same—either as an unchanging Kindle edition or simple paperback—the universe that produces, breathes life into, and supports books is changing in positive, inclusive ways, year by year. The Future Book is here and continues to evolve. You’re holding it. It’s exciting. It’s boring. It’s more important than it has ever been.

      因为“书”只是复杂基础设施网格的端点,而且越来越容易访问。即使端点顽固地保持不变——无论是一成不变的Kindle版,还是简单的平装书,但创造、注入生命并支持书籍的世界正以积极、包容的方式逐年发生变化。未来之书就在这里,而且还在继续发展。你正拿着它。这是令人兴奋的,也是无聊的。这比以往任何时候都重要。

    1. It’s this thing that we were warned about. It’s this thing that we knew could happen. Norbert Wiener, who coined the term cybernetics, warned about it as a possibility. And despite all the warnings, and despite all of the cautions, we just walked right into it, and we created mass behavior-modification regimes out of our digital networks. We did it out of this desire to be both cool socialists and cool libertarians at the same time.

      有人警告过我们。这是我们知道可能会发生的事情。控制论一词的创造者诺伯特 · 维纳(Norbert Wiener)对这种可能性发出了警告。尽管有这么多的警告,我们还是一头扎进去了, 我们用我们的数字网络,创造了大规模的行为矫正系统。我们这样做是出于同时成为酷的社会主义者和酷的自由主义者的愿望。

    1. For now, the Solid technology is still new and not ready for the masses. But the vision, if it works, could radically change the existing power dynamics of the Web. The system aims to give users a platform by which they can control access to the data and content they generate on the Web. This way, users can choose how that data gets used rather than, say, Facebook and Google doing with it as they please. Solid’s code and technology is open to all—anyone with access to the Internet can come into its chat room and start coding. “One person turns up every few days. Some of them have heard about the promise of Solid, and they are driven to turn the world upside down,” he says. Part of the draw is working with an icon. For a computer scientist, coding with Berners-Lee is like playing guitar with Keith Richards. But more than just working with the inventor of the Web, these coders come because they want to join the cause. These are digital idealists, subversives, revolutionaries, and anyone else who wants to fight the centralization of the Web. For his part, working on Solid brings Berners-Lee back to the Web’s early days: “It’s under the radar, but working on it in a way puts back some of the optimism and excitement that the ‘fake news’ takes out.”

      目前,Solid技术还是新技术,还没有为大众做好准备。但是,如果这一设想可行的话,它将从根本上改变现有的网络力量动态。该系统旨在为用户提供一个平台,用户可以通过该平台控制对他们在网上生成的数据和内容的访问。这样一来,用户可以选择如何使用这些数据,而不是像 Facebook 和谷歌那样随心所欲地使用这些数据。Solid的代码和技术是对所有人开放的——任何能够上网的人都可以进入它的聊天室并开始编码。"每隔几天就会有一个人出现。他们中的一些人听说过Solid的前景,他们被驱使着要颠覆这个世界。"他说。对于一个计算机科学家来说,与Berners-Lee一起编码就像与Keith Richards一起弹吉他一样。但这些编码员不仅仅是与万维网的发明者一起工作,他们来这里是因为他们想加入这个事业。这些人是数字理想主义者、颠覆者、革命者,以及其他任何想要对抗网络中心化的人。对Berners-Lee来说,在Solid上的工作让他回到了互联网的早期。"虽然还没有引起人们的注意,但在某种程度上,做这件事会让‘假新闻’带来的乐观和兴奋有所减退。"

    1. And it’s not just that these early Silicon Valley wunderkinds didn’t have children themselves–there were no women or minorities or older people around either, as sociologist Judy Wacjman points out. “Silicon Valley is notorious in particular for not being family-friendly,” she says. “It’s notorious for being full of young male designers. It’s great that they’re thinking about this now that they’re having kids, but I wonder if one could envision a different design community full of people of different sexes, full of people of different ages. Some of the design that you get is the reflection of the limited cultural understanding of the young guys who are doing the designing.”

      正如社会学家朱迪·瓦茨曼(Judy Wacjman)指出的那样,这不仅仅是因为这些早期的硅谷天才自己没有孩子——周围也没有女性或少数族裔或老年人。"硅谷以不适合家庭生活而臭名昭著,"她说。"因为到处都是年轻的男性设计师。他们现在有了孩子,能想到这一点真是太好了,但我想知道是否可以设想一个不同的设计社区,里面充满了不同性别的人,充满了不同年龄的人。你所得到的一些设计是反映了那些做设计的年轻人对文化理解的有限性。"

    1. as an army wife raising three kids on less than sustainable wag

      I would just like to mention how being below America's poverty line is ridiculous. Also the fact that every state in America has a poverty percentage of ~15% (fact check me) or lower and then Puerto Rico is ~44% below the poverty line. It's just something to think about when you read Cristy's story about growing up in Mexico, which is sad to read.

    1. Facebook is fundamentally not a network of ideas. It’s a network of people. And though it has two billion active users every month, you can’t just start trading insights with all of them. As Facebook advises, your Facebook friends are generally people you already know in real life. That makes it more likely, not less, to stimulate homogeneity of thought. You can encounter strangers if you join groups that interest you, but those people’s posts are not necessarily going to get much airtime in your News Feed. The News Feed is engineered to show you things you probably will want to click on. It exists to keep you happy to be on Facebook and coming back many times a day, which by its nature means it is going to favor emotional and sensational stories.

      Facebook从根本上来说不是一个思想的网络。它是一个人际网络。虽然它每个月有20亿活跃用户,但你不能就这样开始和他们所有人交换见解。正如Facebook建议的那样,你的Facebook好友一般都是你在现实生活中已经认识的人。这使它更有可能,而不是更少,刺激思想的同质性。如果你加入你感兴趣的群组,你可能会遇到陌生人,但这些人的帖子不一定会在你的新闻动态(News Feed)中占据太多时间。新闻动态(News Feed)的设计是为了让你看到你可能会想点击的东西。它的存在是为了让你在Facebook上开心,并每天查看多次,这意味着它会是情感和耸人听闻的故事。

    1. Reviewer #1:

      The manuscript entitled "An evolutionary model identifies the main selective pressures for the evolution of genome-replication profiles" is an examination of the principles shaping evolution of replication origin placement. Overall I found the manuscript to be engaging and interesting, and the topic of general importance. It is quite compelling that with just two parameters, origin efficiency and distance between origins, a good model can be built to describe the dynamics of origin birth and death. While this work on its own is sufficiently important for publication, it would be very interesting to see whether the model can be updated in the future to address whether there are fork-stalling or origin-generating mechanisms that shape evolution of specific inter-origin spaces. This work provides a very good foundation for such efforts.

      I have a few major, general concerns I would like the authors to address.

      If I'm interpreting the methods correctly, it seems the parameters used in these simulations, such as mean birth rate, mean death rate, gamma, and beta, were fit to the data once, and used as point estimates during simulation. If true, I expect the simulations to be yielding estimates of birth and death rates with a much narrower distribution of outcomes than is likely to be realistic given what an appropriate level of confidence in those parameter estimates would be. Could the parameters be fit to data in such a way that we attain an estimate of confidence in the parameter values, from which a distribution could be generated and sampled from during simulation?

      Closely related to my prior concern, I would like the authors to demonstrate the general predictive value of their model on out-of-sample data. Can the model be applied to other data on replication timing? Without such an attempt to demonstrate the model's applicability to out-of-sample prediction, the reader cannot ascertain whether the model is overfit to the Lachancea data from Agier et al, 2018. Also, keeps the parameter estimates here from being overfit to better predict origin birth and death events in closely related branches of the Lachancea tree in Figure S1? Are gamma and beta inferred in a way that accounts for the higher correlation in birth and death events in closer-related branches than in distal branches, or has the fit ignored those correlations?

      The authors state that their model identifies selective pressures. The authors imply, and specifically state in lines 238-242, that increased death rate of origins which happen to be nearby highly efficient origins represents selective pressure against the less efficient origins. It isn't until the discussion that the authors raise the possibility that there may simply be a lack of selective pressure to retain inefficient origins that are near highly efficient origins. In my view, it's more likely that selection for the existence of an inefficient origin is simply lower than the drift barrier, so mutagenesis and drift can passively remove such origins over time without the need to invoke selection against inefficient origins.

      Figure 3 is intended to show that the stall-aversion and interference model performs better at predicting correlations between efficiency of lost origins and their nearest neighbor. I agree, but I do not think Figure 3 presents a strong case for this conclusion. Fig S6 presents stronger evidence to me. While fig 3 does qualitatively suggest that the joint model may predict the correlation between neighboring origin efficiency and origin loss better than the double-stall model alone, it almost appears to me that the model with fork stalling and interference has significantly overestimated the correlation. Is there a quantitative way, perhaps using information criteria, though I admittedly am not sure how one would go about doing that with simulations such as these, to demonstrate that the model with both effects has better predictive value than the one with only fork stalling?

      There are a couple of assumptions of the model that I would like the authors to examine in further detail. First, that origin birth events occur in the middle of an inter-origin space. I am not aware of evidence pointing to this being a good a priori assumption. Can you re-run the simulations, allowing origins to arise at a random site within the inter-origin space into which it is born? Second, is it reasonable to expect origin firing rates to reshuffle to a new value randomly, without any dependence on their prior rate? Perhaps I'm mistaken, but it seems to me that an origin's firing rate should evolve more gradually, and should have a higher probability of sampling from values near its current value than from values very far from its current value.

    1. Ah, the old advertising games... It's kind of hard to explain for new generation of players, but back in the days we had games fully dedicated to certain brands. And they wanted us to pay for them. Don't get me wrong, I'm not talking about games like Zool and Biker Mice from Mars that used to include excessive product placement. Even some Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles games had it. I'm talking about games that were created solely to promote a certain brand. Like Pepsiman, where we played as that weird Pepsi mascot, or Avoid the Noid with the scary bunny-like... creature from Domino's (there was actually another game about him, but it was just a “hack” of somewhat popular Famicom game Kamen no Ninja: Hanamaru). Like I've said, it's kind of hard to explain, but back in the days, kids were less sarcastic, while Ads were... well, a bit more than just Ads.With no Internet, with TV being way more than it's today and with way, WAY less rules applied (because SEGA does what Nintendon't), Ads were more than just that annoying thing that interrupts Rhett and Link on YouTube. Those were almost art on their own. And the perfect scenario for a brand was to create the mascots so cool that everybody would want to buy merchandise with it. I mean, aside from the main product. Like, everybody loves Cap'n Crunch (huge fan here). But would you also pay for a PEZ dispenser with the man? Would you like a T-shirt? That's how it worked back in the days. And with video games starting to recover from large-scale recession of early 80s, when crappy products like Pepsi Invaders almost killed the entire market, we've got ourselves advertising games... that were actually quite good.Believe it, or not, but the games about 7-Up's Spot, Cheetos' Chester Cheetah and even McDonald's Ronald McDonald were actually pretty solid. And sometimes there were even games that tried to achieve more than that. From a fourth generation platformer with kickass soundtrack called Global Gladiators that used to include McDonald's kids Mick and Mack (previously included in the game called MC Kids, which wasn't as good) to a weird 3D action game called Darkened Skye, which featured magic system based on Skittles. Let's just say that advertising games were not as simple as you may think. And this one? Not only it's my most favorite game of the kind, it's, like, one of my most favorite puzzle games... ever. Together with The Incredible Machines, Supaplex and so on. It's that good.First of all, Pushover is a game that was made to promote a popular British snack Quavers (they're so curly!). Quavers are the curly potato puffs and their mascot, Colin Curly... just lost all of them. So, as Colin's ant friend, we need to go down through the ant hill to some caves (because reasons) and get them back. That's pretty much all the background we've got here. Nothing big, nothing really interesting, but... it doesn't matter. Like... at all. The thing is – Pushover is an action puzzle game, the story doesn't really matter in that genre, while gameplay-wise... well, like I've said, this game is totally awesome.Long story short, Pushover is all about the domino effect. You push (hence the title) one block and watch the others falling. Naturally, your goal is to drop all the blocks on level during the limited amount of time. After that, you'll be able to exit the current level and get the password for the next one. Which will be very useful, since the game comes with the whooping 100 levels, some of which will be pretty tricky. Sounds pretty dull, though, can't argue with that. I mean, who cares about domino, right? Pushing blocks on 100 levels... sounds boring, right? But it's not that simple.See, there are ten different types of blocks in this game. All with their own unique properties. And trying to figure out how to drop all blocks on the levels with just a couple of pushes? It's just fun. Very, very fun. So fun that I actually love this game more than Lemmings. And everybody knows just how fun Lemmings game is. Pushover is just... well, it's hard to explain, but it's one of those games, which just “click”. It's one of those games, in which “stars” aligned perfectly. Controls are simple enough, the puzzles are very interesting and tricky (but not too tricky to make you feel bad), the graphics is very cute, the sound has that awesome “Sound Blaster” feeling... Pushover is just one of those games that you can't stop playing. 28 years later? I still can't get enough of it. And it's not just me. Even though the game was ported to quite a lot of systems (there was even SNES version with all Quavers Ads completely removed), there was a fan-made remake released in 2006. Guess, it says something.What we have here is a 100% original (not remade) DOS version (runs through DOSBox), but guess what? No complains here. Even though very often Amiga versions had better music, Pushover was not one of such games (I totally prefer the DOS sound), while all “big three” versions (Amiga, Atari ST and DOS) look almost identical and I'm not a big fan of those “filters” from fan-made remake. I mean... it's pretty cool version and stuff, but... there's nothing like the original.So, yeah. I can't recommend this game enough. Pushover is charming, cute, smart and extremely addicting puzzle game from early nineties. You like games like Lemmings, Bomberman, Wrecking Crew and so on? You should totally check this one out. Like the original Goonies (which also got fan-made remake, by the way), this game is a forgotten gem from the past. It's in my Steam favorites and it'll stay there forever. I love it that much. Dixi.
    1. A factual statement, regardless of whether it was accurate or inaccurate. In other words, they were to choose this classification if they thought that the statement could be proved or disproved based on objective evidence. An opinion statement, regardless of whether they agreed with the statement or not. In other words, they were to choose this classification if they thought that it was based on the values and beliefs of the journalist or the source making the statement, and could not definitively be proved or disproved based on objective evidence.

      I think that these are both very strong definitions. I can't find any gaps in either of them, but I do wonder if there is ever any overlap and/or spectrum between fact and opinion? I just wonder if they can be sorted into such neat categories without simplifying them? I feel like the answer to that question is yes because I really do agree with the definitions, and I think it's beneficial for the study that they had such clear parameters/guidelines for how participants should approach each category.

  3. doc-00-2o-docs.googleusercontent.com doc-00-2o-docs.googleusercontent.com
    1. Grad school can be stressful enough during normal times, but it's likely worse during a global pandemic. You may be (or know) someone who has lost their job, tested positive for COVID-19, been hospitalized, or taken on new family responsibilities. Not only this, but there are other ongoing events that are constant reminders of inequalities and injustices you may be facing.I am fully committed to making sure that you learn everything you were hoping to learn from this class! Although formal deadlines are an important part of giving structure to a class, my late policy and willingness to make accommodations are pretty generous even during normal times, and if this pandemic (or anything else) is turning your life upside down, I'm willing to be as flexible as you need me to be. I have also adjusted the weekly activities for the course so that some are optional. I think all of the activities are worth completing, but this isn't the semester to be picky about that. If you feel like you're behind, not understanding everything, or just plain stressed, do not suffer in silence!I'm pretty quick to respond to email and more than happy to meet with you.

      That's a relief to see! I currently work in a pharmacy, so grad. school has been even more difficult while being an essential healthcare worker.

    1. I was not alone in my judgment. Screen International, the British trade paper, convenes a panel of critics to score the official entries. "The Brown Bunny" scored 0.6 out of a possible five--the lowest score in its history, the paper said. This came as a blow to the French. Their national pride could not abide the notion that an American film was worse than any of their own, and so a few days later they countered with Bertrand Blier's "Les Cotelettes.""

      Here he uses logos to get people on his side. It's not just he who has these nasty feelings about the film, plenty are giving negative reviews to the film and the overall score of 0.6 out of 5 just goes to show it.

  4. dangerouslyirrelevant.org dangerouslyirrelevant.org
    1. ameliorate hegemony

      ...to fix the imbalance of power...and improve equity across the educational spectrum, it becomes incumbent upon educational leadership to take the first steps - YES, AND, what we need as educational leaders to do so is the support of structures, systems and other leaders to lean on when there is (inevitable) push back by staff, community members and other colleagues.

      We have an AMAZING Director of Language, Culture & Equity in our district and she has led our community through the difficult yet necessary process of adopting an Educational Equity Board Policy

      In addition, our Nondiscrimination Policy has had a significant revisions, including several progressive changes.<br> I say this, not just to brag on her work and that of our district, but to highlight the fact that this wasn't easy. We experience significant push back from our great community - families "protesting" the changes and staff refusing to participate in training around the shifts. This work is HARD, it's messy and it's extremely emotional - but, it's also WORTH it!

    1. Everyone saw it—he was trying to kill himself by riding into the bus!

      I found this to be one of the more interesting quotes in this story. Why would the drivers immediate reaction be to say that the cyclist was attempt to commit suicide? It's much more likely that he legitimately didn't see the bus. Is the bus driver trying to keep the blame off of him? Why not just say that he was unable to stop in time.

  5. Jan 2021
    1. democracies will have to strike a balance between scientific expertise and political sensitivities, a skill that will prove useful beyond the current pandemic in addressing the climate crisis

      This quote is remarkable because it's showing just how much power are given to these groups of people and it's completely under their discretion on how the nation could be opened or closed during this pandemic, which is hard to create a medium and deciding the best for the nation in terms of happiness and safety

    2. states should make a greater effort to raise individual awareness of democratic freedoms and civic responsibilities, and encourage impactful participation

      I think that there should be more talk about voting and just political talk in communities more. I feel like this year there was a lot of advertisement to vote and get your voice heard but I feel like it's just not talked enough and I feel like it should be.

    3. Today, in the United States, Europe, and beyond, doctors and public health experts are frequent fixtures at government press conferences and on news programs.

      Because of COVID-19, we have start to recognize that doctors and people in the healthcare field are important to talk to when dealing with things like diseases. It's important to note that they can also be misled with information and we shouldn't just rely on one sector (doctors). Every profession in the community has a role in the spread of information: doctors, the media, and us.

    4. Similarly, Greece has been widely praised for its “textbook crisis management,”22 due at least in part to the government’s prioritization of science.

      My family is from Greece and I have to say that I have been so proud of the way that Greece has handled the pandemic and focused on science, without ever creating the politicized mess that happened here in America. And even though the science is not always perfect and has been hard to come by, it's the closest thing to a guideline that we have for the situation, and in Greece and the other countries mentioned, the people and governments just got it together and handled it rather than whining.

    1. EDUC 7100 | Course Syllabus, Spring 2021Page 1EDUC 7100. Leadership for Educational OrganizationsCourse SyllabusSpring 2021Leadership for Educational OrganizationsSchool of Education and Human Development (SEHD)University of Colorado Denverucdenver.instructure.com/courses/463269(we also may use some other technology tools!)Should You Read This Syllabus?●Snoop Dogg says...Before We Get Started...Before I get into the logistical stuff, I just wanted to reiterate how proud of yourselves you shouldbe. The past year has been awful, and yet you have survived every terrible day, every difficultthing, every horrible circumstance, and every horrendous heartbreak and loss. You've adapted.You've fought through adversity. You've served as caring educators, nurturing family members,supportive friends, and local leaders. ​You've given when you thought you had no more togive.Your doctoral program is going to layer additional challenges on top of all of this. You’ll havereadings that make your head hurt. You’ll have assignments that cause you to curse yourinstructors. You’ll have the stress of academic deadlines, and you’ll be confused as you strugglewith new ways of thinking, writing, and being. ​It’s going to be worth it.​ Because when we’redone, you’ll have accomplished something less than 2 percent of Americans have done. And noone will be able to take away the new letters after your name.As we lean into the challenges before us, let’s lead first and foremost with an ​ethic of care​.Let’s support each other throughout the months and years ahead. Let’s prioritize our individualand collective well-being, which includes putting aside our egos and asking for help andaccommodations when we need them. And let’s keep giving each other productive feedbackthat helps us all get better. Alone, this will be hard. Together, we've got this, no sweat

      This brought a tear to my eye. Thank you for these words. They are very impactful and meaningful.

    2. EDUC 7100 | Course Syllabus, Spring 2021Page 1EDUC 7100. Leadership for Educational OrganizationsCourse SyllabusSpring 2021Leadership for Educational OrganizationsSchool of Education and Human Development (SEHD)University of Colorado Denverucdenver.instructure.com/courses/463269(we also may use some other technology tools!)Should You Read This Syllabus?●Snoop Dogg says...Before We Get Started...Before I get into the logistical stuff, I just wanted to reiterate how proud of yourselves you shouldbe. The past year has been awful, and yet you have survived every terrible day, every difficultthing, every horrible circumstance, and every horrendous heartbreak and loss. You've adapted.You've fought through adversity. You've served as caring educators, nurturing family members,supportive friends, and local leaders. ​You've given when you thought you had no more togive.Your doctoral program is going to layer additional challenges on top of all of this. You’ll havereadings that make your head hurt. You’ll have assignments that cause you to curse yourinstructors. You’ll have the stress of academic deadlines, and you’ll be confused as you strugglewith new ways of thinking, writing, and being. ​It’s going to be worth it.​ Because when we’redone, you’ll have accomplished something less than 2 percent of Americans have done. And noone will be able to take away the new letters after your name.As we lean into the challenges before us, let’s lead first and foremost with an ​ethic of care​.Let’s support each other throughout the months and years ahead. Let’s prioritize our individualand collective well-being, which includes putting aside our egos and asking for help andaccommodations when we need them. And let’s keep giving each other productive feedbackthat helps us all get better. Alone, this will be hard. Together, we've got this, no sweat (okay,maybe a little!).

      so good.

    1. The tendency to overemphasize personal attributions in others versus ourselves seems to occur for several reasons. One is simply because other people are so salient in our social environments. When you look at someone’s behavior, you tend to focus on that person and are likely to make personal attributions about him or her. It’s just easy because you are looking right at the person. When you look at Cejay giving that big tip, you see him—and so you decide that he caused the action. In fact, research has shown that we tend to make more personal attributions for the people we are directly observing in our environments than for other people who are part of the situation but who we are not directly watching (Taylor & Fiske, 1975). When you think of your own behavior, however, you do not see yourself but are instead more focused on the situation. You also tend to have more memory for your own past situations than for others’. You come to realize that it is not only you but also the different situations that you are in that determine your behavior. Maybe you can remember the other times where you did not give a big tip, and so you conclude that your behavior is caused more by the situation than by your underlying personality. This greater access to evidence about our own past behaviors can lead us to realize that our conduct varies quite a lot across situations, whereas because we have more limited memory of the behavior of others, we may see them as less changeable. This in turn leads to another, related attributional tendency, namely the trait ascription bias, which defines a tendency for people to view their own personality, beliefs, and behaviors as more variable than those of others (Kammer, 1982). We are thus more likely to caricature the behaviors of others as just reflecting the type of people we think they are, whereas we tend to depict our own conduct as more nuanced, and socially flexible. A second reason for the tendency to make so many personal attributions is that they are simply easier to make than situational attributions. In fact, personal attributions seem to be made spontaneously, without any effort on our part, and even on the basis of only very limited behavior (Newman & Uleman, 1989; Uleman, Blader, & Todorov, 2005). Personal attributions just pop into mind before situational attributions do. One reason for this is that is cognitively demanding to try to process all the relevant factors in someone else’s situation and to consider how all these forces may be affecting that person’s conduct. It is much more straightforward to label a behavior in terms of a personality trait. Third, personal attributions also dominate because we need to make them in order to understand a situation. That is, we cannot make either a personal attribution (e.g., “Cejay is generous”) or a situational attribution (“Cejay is trying to impress his friends”) until we have first identified the behavior as being a generous behavior (“Leaving that big tip was a generous thing to do”). So we end up starting with the personal attribution (“generous”) and only later try to correct or adjust our judgment (“Oh,” we think, “perhaps it really was the situation that caused him to do that”). Adjusting our judgments generally takes more effort than does making the original judgment, and the adjustment is frequently not sufficient. We are more likely to commit attributional errors—for example quickly jumping to the conclusion that behavior is caused by underlying personality—when we are tired, distracted, or busy doing other things (Geeraert, Yzerbyt, Corneille, & Wigboldus, 2004; Gilbert, 1989; Trope & Alfieri, 1997).

      This section discusses possible reasons for the actor-observer effect.

    1. Different data sources are better suited for different types of data transformations and provide access to different data quantities at different freshnesses

      Comparison of data sources

      • Data warehouses / lakes (such as Snowflake or Redshift) tend to hold a lot of information but with low data freshness (hours or days). They can be a gold mine, but are most useful for large-scale batch aggregations with low freshness requirements, such as “number of lifetime transactions per user.”
      • Transactional data sources (such as MongoDB or MySQL) usually store less data at a higher freshness and are not built to process large analytical transformations. They’re better suited for small-scale aggregations over limited time horizons, like the number of orders placed by a user in the past 24 hrs.
      • Data streams (such as Kafka) store high-velocity events and provide them in near real-time (within milliseconds). In common setups, they retain 1-7 days of historical data. They are well-suited for aggregations over short time-windows and simple transformations with high freshness requirements, like calculating that “trailing count over the last 30 minutes” feature described above.
      • Prediction request data is raw event data that originates in real-time right before an ML prediction is made, e.g. the query a user just entered into the search box. While the data is limited, it’s often as “fresh” as can be and contains a very predictive signal. This data is provided with the prediction request and can be used for real-time calculations like finding the similarity score between a user’s search query and documents in a search corpus.
    1. One way to understand Dynamicland is as a reaction to the wild success of, and the subsequent regrets about, Xerox PARC. The original inventors of computers didn’t mean to be taken so literally. This was just one possible vision for computing--not the only one and certainly not the best one. Today Bret is showing us a better way forward. A more humane computer. And that computer is not a device. It’s a normal-seeming room.

      理解Dynamicland的一种方法是 将其视为对Xerox PARC取得巨大成功之后的后悔反应。今天的计算机只是计算的一种可能图景 – 不是唯一的,也不是最好的。Bret向我们展示了更好的前进方向。一台更人性化的电脑。那台电脑不是一台设备。而是一个看似正常的房间。

    1. (quoted

      all this sucks because it's like we know how the virus spreads, we've educated people about it, we've found treatments that kind of help, that are accessible to everyone, that have been tested on people of all diversities, that include the opinion of those effected and yet the death toll rates keep sky rocketing. Meaning the spread of the virus is now just based on human ignorance.

    Annotators

    1. A new central location for a library will fulfil the same purpose and should be prioritized, along with steps to make cycling and walking more attractive

      It's so odd to me that the Central Library is seen as just another focal point like 'recent waterfront developments', and not as a means to try to attract and retain highly educated residents.

      Other cities such as Toronto use their libraries as a means to encourage entrepreneurship and to support small businesses.

    1. I'm firmly of the opinion that most religions have their basis in mystical experiences.In every single case where someone has described having an "otherworldly experience" - they've had one of these mystical experiences. These experiences take many shapes or forms, but several common themes are a sense of Oneness, connection with a higher power, and entities. It doesn't matter if these experiences are "real" or not. Subjectively, they often tend to be more real than "reality," and the impact of the experience may well have a lasting impression on that individual's persona.These types of experiences have been going on for thousands - tens of thousands of years. And the leading way we've discussed them is through language. I don't know if you've ever noticed, but language is incredibly limited, despite all the amazing things we've accomplished with it. We are pretty much limited to topics where common ideas can be described through symbols. And misunderstandings abound. Ideas can be shared, and changed, but they're all based on common understandings - common experiences - even if these understandings may conflict at times.Imagery through art and music conveys what words cannot, but intertextuality and reader response criticism still limit the interpretation. For some, a painting may symbolize the unification between man and his maker, but for most it's just going to be a chick on a horse. And the same goes for music and texts.So people have had these mystical experiences since pre-history. Picture trying to describe a wooden chair to a man who has never seen trees, and has lived all his life where they sit on the floor. Try describing the sound of rain to a deaf person, or the patterns of a kaleidoscope to the blind. The inability for people to convey mystical experiences goes even further.Having our senses show us a world fundamentally different from what we're used to, language is momentarily found lacking. Having experienced the ineffable, one grasps for any semblance of similarity. This lead to the use of cultural metaphors. Frustrated by the inadequacy of words, one sought anything that could give a shadow of a hint at what was trying to be conveyed.Be it through drumming and dancing, imbibing something, meditation, singing - what have you - people have been doing these things forever in order to experience something else. As we narrowed down what worked, each generation would follow in their elders footsteps and take part in the eventual rituals that formed around the summoning of these mystical experiences. These initiations revealed the deeper meanings hidden within the cultural metaphors and the mythology they'd created. Hidden in plain sight, but only fully understood once you'd had the subjective experience necessary to see beyond the veil of language.The mythology that grew out of these experiences weren't dogmatic law, but guides for the people that grew with each generation. The map is not the path, and people were aware of this.The first major change to how we related to these passed down teachings was the fall of the ritual; those parts of the ritual that would give rise to the mystical experience. The heart of the ceremony was left out, and what remained - the motions, without meaning - grew rigid with time. The metaphors remained, but without the deeper subjective insights to help interpret them. Eventually all was left were the elder's words, a mythology that grew more dogmatic with each following generation. The only reality that exist is the one we have experienced and can imagine. As our reality is based upon the limitations of our perception of the world, so too are the teachings limited.Translations of these texts conflated and combined allegory with historical events, while politics altered the teachings for gain. Eventually we ended up here, where most major religions still hold that spark of the old ideas - but twisted to serve the will of man, instead of guiding him.Western Theosophy, Eastern Caodaism, and Middle Eastern Bahai Faith are a few practices that see the same inner light within all belief systems - Grown out of mystical experiences, but hidden by centuries and millennia of rigid dogma.As long as people continue to have mystical experiences - and we're hardwired for them - spirituality will exist. As long as people allow themselves to be beguiled into believing individuals are gatekeepers though which they'll find the answers to these mystical revelations, there will be religion and corrupting influences.So all religions with an origin in mystical experiences may be true, where the differences lie in the cultural metaphors used to explain the ineffable beyond our normal perception - without the tarnish of politics and control.If you want to discover the truths behind these faiths, you need to delve into the practices that brought on those beliefs. Simply adhering to scripture will only amount to staring at the finger pointing at the moon.

      This is an example of the logical appeal. Referencing facts and written as though a formal essay, people's intellectual sides are stimulated as this author refers to historical events, mythical experiences, theosophy, caodaism and Bahai Faith in order to make a general point. This appeal was effective, as there is a significant number of likes on this post in the thread then other threads, meaning it gained traction. The author likely picked this appeal because they themselves were knowledgable about the topics discussed and knew they could contribute to the overall discussion without sounding out of place or ignorant. Considering reddit allows for anyone to contribute to discussions, but specifically gains attention for thought provoking pieces on which debates can be had-it makes sense that this post was accepted.

    1. No journalist is the first person to know anything, if they’re reporting on what happened to another person, though you might be the first person to listen. It’s always someone else’s story first, and it never stops being their story too, no matter how well you tell it, how widely you spread it.

      I never thought about it this way. It is true that journalist are just the ones that tell other's peoples story and report based off what they heard.

    1. It’s important to “push beyond the factual,” says Dennie Palmer Wolf (1987), but unfortunately “extended stretches of questioning in which the information builds from facts toward insight or complex ideas rarely take place” in many classrooms.

      I never thought of it this way I think this is really interesting especially the one where instead of where the characters took place, we can think of even more complex questions like why they never left home. I just thought that was cool for a sec lol.

    2. (by evaluating them on the number of facts they’ve crammed into short-term memory).

      It's just like throwing out the answers that you know will give you a good grade

    1. Just walking through the campus gates unavoidably heightens these students’ awareness and experience of the deep inequalities around them.

      Very true, the "old money" air is apparent as soon as you step on to many ivy league schools. how could we begin to change the money infused atmosphere of elite and historic colleges? They often rely on big name families of alumni and donors for their programs and clubs. In fact they pride themselves on it. It's no wonder that scholarship, low income, and students of color often feel immediately unwelcome

    2. Hiring more diverse staff and administrators, as well as those who are familiar with these issues, is important in this effort — but this work can’t just be consigned to the diversity dean, who is often the only person of color in the office.

      You really do have to start from the top it's just hard to do that with all the bias and ten-year immunity a lot of the people in charge have.

    1. just like touring has there there are um 00:44:56 impact trying to prove there's a countable infinity of turing machines yeah so i'm i have this structure that i call a conscious agent and there's going to be a large set of conscious agents right and so the idea will be 00:45:08 that each conscious agent has its own set of experiences and then probabilistically affects the experiences of other agents and so i'm going to get this is if you think about it it's going to be a network dynamics this is like a vast social network that 00:45:20 comes out of us so all the new mathematics that we're doing to understand twitter and all these social networks is the mathematics that we need to use to study the dynamical systems of conscious agents that that i and my team are working on

      countable infinity of turing machines

      networkd dynamics vast social network

    1. be careful with your word choice

      From personal experience, I know that word choice counts. Even the most well thought out statement can have different meanings for different people, so we have to take that into consideration as well. For example, if your brother stinks and needs to learn about personal hygiene, you may just tell him to go take a shower. But if it's an acquaintance or someone you are not very close to, you would have to be much gentler with your wording. It only takes one wrong word to hurt someone's feelings, even unintentionally. What's really bad is sometimes they really take that to heart and it may affect them long after your talk.

    1. The possibility that government, any government, can just as easily ruin you as save you

      The fact that this can happen is insane. What is keeping us afloat is the same one that can tear us down. It also states "any government" which means it's not always the typical one we tend to think it is, but rather the other types of governments that we forget are governments.

    2. What if you found that one of your rear wheels wasn’t aligned correctly and was pointing to the left, and upon further inspection you found that the other rear wheel was also unaligned and pointing to the right

      This type of difference of opinions within our branches of government can be detrimental to us and not help our country by moving forward instead stalling or even making more conflict for everyone. But we must also be mindful that just because the 2 branches view things the same way, doesn’t mean it’s a positive.

    3. Every once in a while, the wheels on that trike might be pointed in the same direction, and it will take you somewhere–let’s just hope it’s not over a cliff.

      I believe this statement holds a lot more than people realize. Imagine if all 3 wheels, 3 branches of government, were being ran by a narrow, same political views. This can lead to conflict, a massive bisect of views and this would be negative for the country.

    1. In this case, we must brush away the dirt (the people, personalities, drama, spin, that fills the news and so much social media)

      A lot of people often tend to just see the government as something general while there is more to it. Since most people are on social media, what they talk about there is mostly sometimes just the first thin layer about the government & politics. Which is why it's a good thing to fact check or look deeper into the information you're seeing.

    1. Even if states couldn’t pay for four years of college for every student, just covering two years would be a significant benefit—and one report from 2014 showed that free two-year programs in all 50 states could be funded using federal financial-aid resources that were already readily available.

      Another example of America not using it's budget for the good of it's inhabitants.

    1. Please don't thank me! ;-) If this answer did help, just click the little grey ☑ at the left of this text right now turning it into beautiful green. If you do not like the answer, click on the little grey down-arrow below the number, and if you really like the answer, click on the little grey ☑ and the little up-arrow... If you have any further questions, just ask another one! ;-)

      How would you even describe this comment?

      "just doing my job"? but he is (I assume) answering to be nice not because it's his job

      "I won't take it personally"? vote my answer up or down, whichever you please

      impartial, dispassionate, and objective, perhaps? "just the facts, ma'am"


      Separately, what is the "Please don't thank me!" for? Is it that politeness? False modesty? Genuine modesty? Or is it rude? Why not allow someone to thank you??

    1. Die not, poore death, nor yet canst thou kill mee.

      Donne's "Death Not Be Proud" concludes that men cannot die from death because they just rest after this life and are delivered into eternal life afterwards. There is no reason to be afraid of death, since the souls of men aren't dying- it's just their bodies. The speaker is also directly talking to death, therefore personifying Death.

    1. As some brave admiral, in former war, Deprived of force, but pressed with courage still, Two rival fleets appearing from afar, Crawls to the top of an adjacent hill; From whence (with thoughts full of concern) he views [5] The wise and daring conduct of the fight, And each bold action to his mind renews His present glory, and his past delight; From his fierce eyes, flashes of rage he throws, As from black clouds when lightning breaks away, [10] Transported, thinks himself amidst his foes, And absent yet enjoys the bloody day;

      I chose these twelve lines as my reading for the Flipgrid assignment. They are dramatic, pulling you in as John Wilmot describes this battle. At first glance it seems like he is talking about a real battle. The way he describes it makes it seem like he is actually there, like this is some great battle in history that he is describing as his forces win the day. However, upon continuing the reading of this poem, it seems more like he is talking about his life and its troubles than an actual battle. Maybe, as an Earl, he was a part of a real battle, but I believe it is a metaphor for the troubles of his life like Pox. What I really like about these first twelve lines, though, is that towards the end we start to see that maybe it's not just as an actual battle. "Absent yet enjoys the bloody day" makes it appear like he's not actually there, that he is retelling it maybe from someone else's point of view, but if this battle is just a metaphor, I think that it is him trying to look at his life from an outside perspective, to distance himself from it and enjoy the bloodiness of it all instead of having to feel and experience how overwhelming it is.

    1. To make room for this kind of program, professional faculties should rid their curricula of excessive technical content that can be learned on the job by well-educated graduates.

      Knowing more is just good for the whole life. Learn art and music to enrich your life. It’s good to be able to show your specialty at parties or other times.

    1. This class is not the most important thing in your life. It’s not the most important thing in mine. Don’t get me wrong, there’s much to learn here and I love and have so much fun exploring these topics with you and your classmates. But take care of yourself. Reach out to me if there are things in your life that end up taking precedence over this class. Let’s talk about them.

      I just wanted to say that I am very grateful for the inclusion of this section in the syllabus. I think its a really important idea to share especially throughout all of the uncertainty and stress that the pandemic has brought. Thank you for reminding us that we can reach out for help and flexibility if we need it.

    1. All the people who have been watching others travel from the sidelines and kept saying they would travel next year or the next year or the next year will be eager to get traveling” once it’s safe to do so again, said Dianelle Rivers-Mitchell, the founder of Black Girls Travel Too, a group tour company for Black women. People “now understand that nothing is guaranteed,” she continued. “If you want to see a place, just do it.”

      ALSO BIG

    1. Come they Lion from the reeds of shovels, The grained arm that pulls the hands

      I'm definitely missing what context informed these lines, but their tone, as well as that of "Come the sweet kinks of the fist, from the full flower," remind me of working/playing in dirt: pulling up weeds, picking up a muddied hose, earthy skid-marks across the hands. There's something less bleak and somber about this section (or stanza? I'm not sure what it's called) in comparison to the "Earth is eating trees, fence posts" and "industrial barns, out of rain, out of bus ride" that make up the first half of the poem.

      EDIT: I've just now learned that a "reed" is a part of a shovel! This whole time I've read it as the reeds of a lake.

    1. Are the books that much better than the disses? Mostly, no, I'd say. So what's the deal? I think it's that we just like books. And by "we" I mean the whole industry of academe.

      Often when I see this pattern happening, the dissertation is the new and original research and the subsequent book is a rewriting of that research into a form meant to help popularize and distribute it into a broader public.

      This is similar, in a way to journal articles being written about by science journalists which then usually massively broadens the audience of the work. Usually this version helps the work to reach more eyeballs than the dissertation to book route does.

      Another version of this might be the translation of a screenplay and a move into a novelization for popular movies. Some of the goal here however is just to make more money.

      It's worth looking at who is (privileged to be) doing the writing in each of these cases.

    1. Yes, Mary, and that is everything. Don't mind my talk­­it's just a moment's irritation and doesn't mean anything. Kiss me­­there, it's all gone now, and I am not complaining any more. What have you been getting? What's in the sack?"

      this part feels so rushed. It oversimplifies things a lot

    2. No, he was gone to Brixton, and might not return before morning.

      I find it interesting that th woman doesn't have a voice in this scene, it's just the narrorator talking. Why is that? Sexism? Stylistic? Does it appear throughout the rest of the text with other genders?

    Annotators

    1. We are ourselves. That is all that we are, and that is enough.

      I believe this is the thesis statement because of the overall meaning of it. It's basically saying that we shouldn't try to be someone we aren't. Why try to be someone else when we can just be ourselves? We are who we are and that's enough. Despite the embarrassment and challenges with being true to yourself, authenticity is the most important virtue to one's character. If I were to change it, I would put it as the very last sentence of the text so it would have a greater impact on the reader.

    1. ell, I just hope you know what you've let us in for . . . [Loudly] I said I hope you know what you've let us in for! It's the end of the peace and quiet we've been having. [S

      The break that Hally had from his father is now done due to his early departure from the hospital. Hally is upset that his mother is letting this happen. Also he upset that the heavy burden of taking care of his dad is back

    2. 35slow on the uptake. It's what's called a pun. You see, fair means both light in color and to be just and decent. [He turns to Sam.] I thought you would catch it, Sam

      It seems like Hally is trying to convince himself that him and his dad have a good relationship when it is clear they don't. Also, he have never seen no sign of racism from Hally until here and this must hurt willie and sam.

    3. ose are big collisions, Hally. They make for a lot of bruises. People get hurt in all that bumping, and we're sick and tired of it now. It's been going on for too long. Are we never going to get it right? . . . learn to dance life like champions instead of always being just a bunch of beginners at it? HALLY: [Deep and sincere admiration of the man.] You've got a vision, Sam!

      first off sam is always seen as the less intelligent while hally is seen as the brains and more logical but here it sets a whole new tone for sam it shows his ideology his passions an so on

    4. HALLY: I don't give a [crap] about my homework, so, for Christ's sake, just shut up about it. [Slamming books viciously into his school case.] Hurry up now and finish your work. I want to lock up and get out of here. [Pause. And then go where? Home-sweet [ . . . ] home. [Geez], I hate that word. [Hally goes to the counter to put the brandy bottle and comics in his school case. After a moment's hesitation, he smashes the bottle of brandy. He abandons all further attempts to hide his feelings. Sam and Willie work away as unobtrusively as possible.] Do you want to know what is really wrong with your lovely little dream, Sam/ It's not just that we are all bad dancers. That does happen to be perfectly true, but there's more to it than just that. You left out the cripples

      Here shows characterization because it shows how hally has a really bad temper and acts out before trying to resolve situations in more of a calmy matter but instead because hally isn't that type of person the first reaction is to lash out

    5. Of course it is. That's what I've been trying to say to you all afternoon. And it's beautiful because that is what we want life to be like. But instead, like you said, Hally, we're bumping into each other all the time. Look at the three of us this afternoon: I've bumped into Willie, the two of us have bumped into you, you've bumped into your mother, she bumping into your Dad . . . None of us knows the steps and there's no music playing. And it doesn't stop with us. The whole world is doing it all the time. Open a newspaper and what do you read? America has bumped into Russia. England is bumping into India, rich man bumps into poor man. Those are big collisions, Hally. They make for a lot of bruises. People get hurt in all that bumping, and we're sick and tired of it now. It's been going on for too long. Are we never going to get it right? . . . learn to dance life like champions instead of always being just a bunch of beginners at it?

      Sam is trying to explain to hally that dancing is something you get down packed right away , it takes time to get better but hally simply believes that it takes no skill or time to learn how to dance

    6. don't give a [crap] about my homework, so, for Christ's sake, just shut up about it. [Slamming books viciously into his school case.] Hurry up now and finish your work. I want to lock up and get out of here. [Pause. And then go where? Home-sweet [ . . . ] home. [Geez], I hate that word. [Hally goes to the counter to put the brandy bottle and comics in his school case. After a moment's hesitation, he smashes the bottle of brandy. He abandons all further attempts to hide his feelings. Sam and Willie work away as unobtrusively as possible.] Do you want to know what is really wrong with your lovely little dream, Sam/ It's not just that we are all bad dancers. That does happen to be perfectly true, but there's more to it than just that. You left out the cripples.

      Characterization shows how Hally has anger problems which maybe the result of his problems at home. Hally was the type to keep his emotions in check but he needed to release it because it was eating at him

    7. Of course it is. That's what I've been trying to say to you all afternoon. And it's beautiful because that is what we want life to be like. But instead, like you said, Hally, we're bumping into each other all the time. Look at the three of us this afternoon: I've bumped into Willie, the two of us have bumped into you, you've bumped into your mother, she bumping into your Dad . . . None of us knows the steps and there's no music playing. And it doesn't stop with us. The whole world is doing it all the time. Open a newspaper and what do you read? America has bumped into Russia. England is bumping into India, rich man bumps into poor man. Those are big collisions, Hally. They make for a lot of bruises. People get hurt in all that bumping, and we're sick and tired of it now. It's been going on for too long. Are we never going to get it right? . . . learn to dance life like champions instead of always being just a bunch of beginners at it?

      Sam is using real life problems to help Hally understand where he is coming from. he says it in a way makes it like mistakes are something that happens everyday. Nobody doesn't make mistakes.

    8. No, it isn't your imagination hasn't helped you at all. There's a lot more to it than that. We're getting ready for the championships, Hally, not just another dance. There's going to be a lot of people, all right, and they're going to have a good time, but they'll only be spectators, sitting around and watching. It's just the competitors our there on the dance floor. Party decorations and fancy lights all around the hall! The ladies in beautiful evening dresses! HALLY: My mother's got one of those, Sam, and quite frankly, it's an embarrassment every time she wears it. SAM: [Undeterred.] Your imagination left out the excitement.

      Sam is explaining why people find ballroom dancing entertaining but Hally still thinks that its a waste of time which then Sam proceeds to say that her imagination is leaving out all the excitement, all of the fun things about it

    9. od. Because what you've been trying to do is meddle in something you know nothing about. All that concerns you here, Sam, is to try and do what you get paid for - keep the place clean and serve the customers. In plain words, just get on with your job. My mother is right. She's always warning me about allowing you to get too familiar. Well, this time you've gone too far. It's going to stop right now. [No response from Sam.] You're only a servant

      Hally and Sams relationship seem to be taking a little turn. Hally is starting to be disrespectful towards Sam. I still Believe that this a result of what Hally is dealing with at home. I dont Feel that he should treat Sam like this because of how good their bond was.

    10. don't give a [crap] about my homework, so, for Christ's sake, just shut up about it. [Slamming books viciously into his school case.] Hurry up now and finish your work. I want to lock up and get out of here. [Pause. And then go where? Home-sweet [ . . . ] home. [Geez], I hate that word. [Hally goes to the counter to put the brandy bottle and comics in his school case. After a moment's hesitation, he smashes the bottle of brandy. He abandons all further attempts to hide his feelings. Sam and Willie work away as unobtrusively as possible.] Do you want to know what is really wrong with your lovely little dream, Sam/ It's not just that we are all bad dancers. That does happen to be perfectly true, but there's

      This detail really shows how Hally has a bad temper. This can be a result of his relationship with his father at home. Although it’s not the best way, this might be his way of expressing his feelings.

    11. AM: [His violence ebbing away into defeat as quickly as it flooded.] You're right. So go on, then: groan again, Willie. You can do it better than me. [To Hally.] You don't know all of what you've just done . . .Master Harold. It's not just that you've made me feel dirtier than I've ever been in my life . . . I mean, how do I wash off yours and your father's filth? . . . I've also failed. A long time ago I promised myself I was going to try to do something, but you've just shown me . . . Master Harold . . . that I've failed. [Pause.] I've also got a memory of a little white boy when he was still wearing short trousers and a black man, but they're not flying a kite. It was the old Jubilee days, after dinner one night. I was in my room. You came in and just stood against the wall, looking down at the ground, and only after I'd asked you what you wanted, what was wrong, I don't know how many times, did you speak and even then so softly I almost didn't hear you. "Sam, please help me to go and fetch my Dad." Remember? He was dead drunk on the floor of the Central Hotel Bar. They'd phoned for your Mom, but you were the only one at home. And do you remember how we did it? You went in first by yourself to ask permission for me to go into the bar. Then I loaded him onto my back like a baby and carried him back to the boarding house with you following behind carrying his crutches. [Shaking his head as he remembers.] A crowded Main Street with all the people watching a little white boy following his drunk father on a nigger's back! I felt for that little boy . . . Master Harold, I felt for him. After that we still had to clean him up, remember? He'd messed in his trousers, so we had to clean him up and get him into bed. HALLY: [Great pain.] I love him, Sam. SAM: I know you do. That's why I tried to stop you from saying these things about him. It would have been so simple if you could have just despised him for being a weak man. But he's your father. You love him and you're ashamed of him. You're ashamed of so much! . . . And now that's going to include yourself. That was the promise I made to myself: to try and stop that happening. [Pause.] After we got him to bed you came back with me to my room and sat in a corner and carried on just looking down at the ground. And for days after that! You hadn't done anything wrong, but you went around as if you owed the world an apology for being alive. I didn't like seeing that! That's not the way a boy grows up to be a man! . . . But th

      Hally seems to always misplace his anger onto the people he wants to keep close, such as Sam, here he realizes his anger is misplaced.

    12. ALLY: I don't give a [crap] about my homework, so, for Christ's sake, just shut up about it. [Slamming books viciously into his school case.] Hurry up now and finish your work. I want to lock up and get out of here. [Pause. And then go where? Home-sweet [ . . . ] home. [Geez], I hate that word. [Hally goes to the counter to put the brandy bottle and comics in his school case. After a moment's hesitation, he smashes the bottle of brandy. He abandons all further attempts to hide his feelings. Sam and Willie work away as unobtrusively as possible.] Do you want to know what is really wrong with your lovely little dream, Sam/ It's not just that we are all bad dancers. That does happen to be perfectly true, but there's more to it than just that. You left out the cripples.

      Hally has extreme problems when it comes to lashing out onto individuals which is seen by his language and tone here. This may be due to his father and strict teachers.

    13. SAM: Of course it is. That's what I've been trying to say to you all afternoon. And it's beautiful because that is what we want life to be like. But instead, like you said, Hally, we're bumping into each other all the time. Look at the three of us this afternoon: I've bumped into Willie, the two of us have bumped into you, you've bumped into your mother, she bumping into your Dad . . . None of us knows the steps and there's no music playing. And it doesn't stop with us. The whole world is doing it all the time. Open a newspaper and what do you read? America has bumped into Russia. England is bumping into India, rich man bumps into poor man. Those are big collisions, Hally. They make for a lot of bruises. People get hurt in all that bumping, and we're sick and tired of it now. It's been going on for too long. Are we never going to get it right? . . . learn to dance life like champions instead of always being just a bunch of beginners at it? HALLY: [Deep and sincere admiration of the man.] You've got a vision, Sam

      Sam beautifully portrays an allusion to real life problems and how they relate to the failures and mistakes of dancing, however he paints it in a view which shows that its okay to make mistakes as the world is already full of them! Hardships are a common occurrence in life.

    14. SAM: No, it isn't your imagination hasn't helped you at all. There's a lot more to it than that. We're getting ready for the championships, Hally, not just another dance. There's going to be a lot of people, all right, and they're going to have a good time, but they'll only be spectators, sitting around and watching. It's just the competitors our there on the dance floor. Party decorations and fancy lights all around the hall! The ladies in beautiful evening dresses!

      Hally doesn't like dancing as much as Willie and Sam and sees it as a waste of time due to the fact that he believes the "spectators" will always judge you if you're not competing with the other dancers who happen to also be there. Hally does not like competition.

    15. Philosophers have been trying to do that for centuries. What is Art? What is Life? But basically I suppose it's . . . the giving of meaning to matter.

      Hally has an extremely bland view on the world (not to say those who study philosophy are bland as these are mere realistic ideas). Hally sees the world in almost a hopeless and never getting better view as he believes art is just meaning to an object or piece of matter.

    16. SAM: Of course it is. That's what I've been trying to say to you all afternoon. And it's beautiful because that is what we want life to be like. But instead, like you said, Hally, we're bumping into each other all the time. Look at the three of us this afternoon: I've bumped into Willie, the two of us have bumped into you, you've bumped into your mother, she bumping into your Dad . . . None of us knows the steps and there's no music playing. And it doesn't stop with us. The whole world is doing it all the time. Open a newspaper and what do you read? America has bumped into Russia. England is bumping into India, rich man bumps into poor man. Those are big collisions, Hally. They make for a lot of bruises. People get hurt in all that bumping, and we're sick and tired of it now. It's been going on for too long. Are we never going to get it right? . . . learn to dance life like champions instead of always being just a bunch of beginners at it?

      Sam takes the problems we face in the world and dance as an example of life without complications.Here Sam is showing how dance treats the soul, how its the time when everything is perfect, its an escape from the troubles and affairs in life.From this I see that Sam uses dance as a third eye to life.

    17. HALLY: I don't give a [crap] about my homework, so, for Christ's sake, just shut up about it. [Slamming books viciously into his school case.] Hurry up now and finish your work. I want to lock up and get out of here. [Pause. And then go where? Home-sweet [ . . . ] home. [Geez], I hate that word. [Hally goes to the counter to put the brandy bottle and comics in his school case. After a moment's hesitation, he smashes the bottle of brandy. He abandons all further attempts to hide his feelings. Sam and Willie work away as unobtrusively as possible.] Do you want to know what is really wrong with your lovely little dream, Sam/ It's not just that we are all bad dancers. That does happen to be perfectly true, but there's more to it than just that. You left out the cripples.

      Hally has major anger issues and is always taking out his anger on others.She needs to learn to control it.

    18. SAM: No, it isn't your imagination hasn't helped you at all. There's a lot more to it than that. We're getting ready for the championships, Hally, not just another dance. There's going to be a lot of people, all right, and they're going to have a good time, but they'll only be spectators, sitting around and watching. It's just the competitors our there on the dance floor. Party decorations and fancy lights all around the hall! The ladies in beautiful evening dresses!

      Sam explains what the championships are like to Hally.

    19. SAM: Of course it is. That's what I've been trying to say to you all afternoon. And it's beautiful because that is what we want life to be like. But instead, like you said, Hally, we're bumping into each other all the time. Look at the three of us this afternoon: I've bumped into Willie, the two of us have bumped into you, you've bumped into your mother, she bumping into your Dad . . . None of us knows the steps and there's no music playing. And it doesn't stop with us. The whole world is doing it all the time. Open a newspaper and what do you read? America has bumped into Russia. England is bumping into India, rich man bumps into poor man. Those are big collisions, Hally. They make for a lot of bruises. People get hurt in all that bumping, and we're sick and tired of it now. It's been going on for too long. Are we never going to get it right? . . . learn to dance life like champions instead of always being just a bunch of beginners at it?

      Sam is trying to explain how hard dancing is to Hally. But Hally won’t listen to Sam Hally is very stubborn and thinks dancing is too dumb.

    20. It's all right, Willie. To Hally. Ja, well, you've done it . . . Master Harold. Yes, I'll start calling you that from now on. It won't be difficult anymore. You're hurt yourself, Master Harold. I saw it coming. I warned you, but you wouldn't listen. You've just hurt yourself bad. And you're a coward, master Harold. The face you should be spitting in is your father's . . . but you used mine, because you think you're safe inside your fair skin . . . and this time I don't mean just or decent. [Pause, then moving violently towards Hally.] Should I hit him, Willie?

      Sam is feeling vengeful, and rightfully so.

    21. don't give a [crap] about my homework, so, for Christ's sake, just shut up about it. [Slamming books viciously into his school case.] Hurry up now and finish your work. I want to lock up and get out of here. [Pause. And then go where? Home-sweet [ . . . ] home. [Geez], I hate that word. [Hally goes to the counter to put the brandy bottle and comics in his school case. After a moment's hesitation, he smashes the bottle of brandy. He abandons all further attempts to hide his feelings. Sam and Willie work away as unobtrusively as possible.] Do you want to know what is really wrong with your lovely little dream, Sam/ It's not just that we are all bad dancers. That does happen to be perfectly true, but there's more to it than just that. You left out the cripples.

      This shows the type of person Hally is she is always angry and have bad energy to things that don't go her way so she say words without thinking and caring who is hurt by what she said

    22. You don't know all of what you've just done . . .Master Harold. It's not just that you've made me feel dirtier than I've ever been in my life . . . I mean, how do I wash off yours and your father's filth? . . . I've also failed. A long time ago I promised myself I was going to try to do something, but you've just shown me . . . Master Harold . . . that I've failed. [Pause.] I've also got a memory of a little white boy when he was still wearing short trousers and a black man, but they're not flying a kite. It was the old Jubilee days, after dinner one night. I was in my room. You came in and just stood against the wall, looking down at the ground, and only after I'd asked you what you wanted, what was wrong, I don't know how many times, did you speak and even then so softly I almost didn't hear you. "Sam, please help me to go and fetch my Dad." Remember? He was dead drunk on the floor of the Central Hotel Bar. They'd phoned for your Mom, but you were the only one at home. And do you remember how we did it? You went in first by yourself to ask permission for me to go into the bar. Then I loaded him onto my back like a baby and carried him back to the boarding house with you following behind carrying his crutches. [Shaking his head as he remembers.] A crowded Main Street with all the people watching a little white boy following his drunk father on a nigger's back! I felt for that little boy . . . Master Harold, I felt for him. After that we still had to clean him up, remember? He'd messed in his trousers, so we had to clean him up and get him into bed.

      Sam had always tried to save the boy and bring him to salvation, seeing how Hally has always been missing a father figure and that his father is just a sad man. Wanting to save Hally from reality, he flies the kite with the boy. And now he has failed to save the boy, because Hally hates his father and is acting out.

    23. SAM: It's me you're after. You should just have said "Sam's arse" . . . because that's the one you're trying to kick. Anyway, how do you know it's not fair? You've never seen it. Do you want to? [He drops his trousers and underpants and presents his backside for Hally's inspection.] Have a good look. A real Basuto {South African people living in what's now Lesotho, then 'Basutoland'} arse . . . which is about as nigger as they can come. Satisfied? [Trousers up.] Now you can make your Dad even happier when you go home tonight. Tell him I showed you my arse and he is quite right. It's not fair. And if it will give him an even better laugh next time, I'll also let him have a look. Come, Willie, let's finish up and go. [Sam and Willie start to tidy up the tea room. Hally doesn't move. He waits for a moment when Sam passes him.]HALLY: [Quietly.] Sam . . . [Sam stops and looks expectantly at the boy. Hally spits in his face. A long and heartfelt grown from Willie. For a few seconds Sam doesn't move.] SAM: [Taking out a handkerchief and wiping his face.] It's all right, Willie. To Hally. Ja, well, you've done it . . . Master Harold. Yes, I'll start calling you that from now on. It won't be difficult anymore. You're hurt yourself, Master Harold. I saw it coming. I warned you, but you wouldn't listen. You've just hurt yourself bad. And you're a coward, master Harold. The face you should be spitting in is your father's . . . but you used mine, because you think you're safe inside your fair skin . . . and this time I don't mean just or decent. [Pause, then moving violently towards Hally.] Should I hit him, Willie?

      Characterization Hally starts to explain to Sam that he did have some good moments with his dad and they were fake or anything he did make him laugh and Sam told Hally he should apologize to what he did to his dad and Willie before they head out but he didn’t listen Hally then spits in Sam face because of what happened between them and this is when things begin to get outta hand with Willie trying to clam down Sam because of what he did and Sam was gonna hit hally

    24. HALLY: That's perfectly correct. You see, you mustn't get the wrong idea about me and my Dad, Sam. We also have our good times together. Some bloody good laughs. He's got a marvelous sense of humor. Want to know what our favorite joke is? He gives out a big groan, you see, and says: "It's not fair, is it, Hally?" Then I have to ask; "What, chum?" And then he says: "A nigger's arse" . . . and we both have a good laugh. [The men stare at him in disbelief.] What's the matter, Willie? Don't you catch the joke? You always were a bit

      Does Hally have bipolar? Because just a moment ago he was. Extremely mad about what Sam was doing to doing him that he considered wrong and mad at his dad but now explains he’s more about his dad to Sam again which he said he didn’t want to hear anymore because Sam doesn’t wanna argue

    25. HALLY: You might just lose your job. SAM: [Quietly and very carefully.] If you make me say it once, I'll never call you anything else again. HALLY: So? [The boy confronts the man.] Is that meant to be a threat? SAM: Just telling you what will happen if you make me do that. You must decide what it means to you. HALLY: Well, I have. It's good news. Because that is exactly what master Harold wants from now on. Think of it as a little lesson in respect, Sam, that's long overdue, and I hope you remember it as well as you do your geography. I can tell you now that somebody who will be glad to hear I've finally given it to you will be my Dad. Yes! He agrees with my Mom. He's always going on about it as well. "You must teach the boys to show you more respect, my son." SAM: So now you can stop complaining about going home. Everybody is going to be happy tonight.

      There’s go Hally again keep adding fire to an unnecessary situation Hally begins bossing around Sam as if he doesn’t mean anything to him and Hally views him as a worthless person telling him what to do and it seem at this point Sam didn’t care about the situation anymore because of Hally choice of words wanting Sam to call him master Harold now for some unnecessary reason or he’ll be fired and told Hally he’ll call him that if he wants that to end tonight conversation

    26. SAM: I'm not the one who's been saying things about him. HALLY: What goes on between me and my Dad is none of your business. SAM: Then don't tell me about it. If that's all you've got to say about him, I don't want to hear. [For a moment Hally is at a loss for a response.] HALLY: Just get on with your bloody work and shut up. SAM: Swearing at me won't help you. HALLY: Yes, it does! Mind your own [ . . . ] business and shut up! SAM: Okay. If that's the way you want it, I'll stop trying. [He turns away. This infuriates Hally even more.]HALLY: Good. Because what you've been trying to do is meddle in something you know nothing about. All that concerns you here, Sam, is to try and do what you get paid for - keep the place clean and serve the customers. In plain words, just get on with your job. My mother is right. She's always warning me about allowing you to get too familiar. Well, this time you've gone too far. It's going to stop right now. [No response from Sam.] You're only a servant in here, and don't forget it. [Still no response. Hally is trying hard to get one.] And as far as my father is concerned, all you need to remember is that he is your boss. SAM: [Needles at last.] No, he isn't. I get paid by your mother. HALLY: Don't argue with me, Sam! SAM: Then don't say he's my boss. HALLY: He's a white man and that's good enough for you.

      Characterization Hally and Sam begins to go at with each other because of the disrespectful things Hally said about his dad that Sam wasn’t happy about and when Sam checked him Willie will tell him it’s none of business which caused Hally to act like he’s a grown man and he runs the shots by putting him in order what his job is here and he needs to do it. Hally does have some issues going on though

    27. HALLY: I don't give a [crap] about my homework, so, for Christ's sake, just shut up about it. [Slamming books viciously into his school case.] Hurry up now and finish your work. I want to lock up and get out of here. [Pause. And then go where? Home-sweet [ . . . ] home. [Geez], I hate that word. [Hally goes to the counter to put the brandy bottle and comics in his school case. After a moment's hesitation, he smashes the bottle of brandy. He abandons all further attempts to hide his feelings. Sam and Willie work away as unobtrusively as possible.] Do you want to know what is really wrong with your lovely little dream, Sam/ It's not just that we are all bad dancers. That does happen to be perfectly true, but there's more to it than just that. You left out the cripples

      Characterization Hally does have some serious anger issues and he’s lashing out on others because his situation with his family

    28. That's what I've been trying to say to you all afternoon. And it's beautiful because that is what we want life to be like. But instead, like you said, Hally, we're bumping into each other all the time. Look at the three of us this afternoon: I've bumped into Willie, the two of us have bumped into you, you've bumped into your mother, she bumping into your Dad . . . None of us knows the steps and there's no music playing. And it doesn't stop with us. The whole world is doing it all the time. Open a newspaper and what do you read? America has bumped into Russia. England is bumping into India, rich man bumps into poor man. Those are big collisions, Hally. They make for a lot of bruises. People get hurt in all that bumping, and we're sick and tired of it now. It's been going on for too long. Are we never going to get it right? . . . learn to dance life like champions instead of always being just a bunch of beginners at it?

      Hally doesn’t think dancing is hard.Hally thinks dancing is for simple minded people and takes no skill.

    29. No, it isn't your imagination hasn't helped you at all. There's a lot more to it than that. We're getting ready for the championships, Hally, not just another dance. There's going to be a lot of people, all right, and they're going to have a good time, but they'll only be spectators, sitting around and watching. It's just the competitors our there on the dance floor. Party decorations and fancy lights all around the hall! The ladies in beautiful evening dresses!

      Hally sees dancing as nothing serious because all she sees is people competing to be judged.

    30. Of course it is. That's what I've been trying to say to you all afternoon. And it's beautiful because that is what we want life to be like. But instead, like you said, Hally, we're bumping into each other all the time. Look at the three of us this afternoon: I've bumped into Willie, the two of us have bumped into you, you've bumped into your mother, she bumping into your Dad . . . None of us knows the steps and there's no music playing. And it doesn't stop with us. The whole world is doing it all the time. Open a newspaper and what do you read? America has bumped into Russia. England is bumping into India, rich man bumps into poor man. Those are big collisions, Hally. They make for a lot of bruises. People get hurt in all that bumping, and we're sick and tired of it now. It's been going on for too long. Are we never going to get it right? . . . learn to dance life like champions instead of always being just a bunch of beginners at it?

      Sam is trying to explain the many difficulties in dancing to Hally.But hally would never see dancing as nothing more than stupid and for simple minded people.

    31. No, it isn't your imagination hasn't helped you at all. There's a lot more to it than that. We're getting ready for the championships, Hally, not just another dance. There's going to be a lot of people, all right, and they're going to have a good time, but they'll only be spectators, sitting around and watching. It's just the competitors our there on the dance floor. Party decorations and fancy lights all around the hall! The ladies in beautiful evening dresses!

      Hally believes that dancing shouldn't be taken as serious as it is and isn’t worth the excitement.

    32. SAM: Of course it is. That's what I've been trying to say to you all afternoon. And it's beautiful because that is what we want life to be like. But instead, like you said, Hally, we're bumping into each other all the time. Look at the three of us this afternoon: I've bumped into Willie, the two of us have bumped into you, you've bumped into your mother, she bumping into your Dad . . . None of us knows the steps and there's no music playing. And it doesn't stop with us. The whole world is doing it all the time. Open a newspaper and what do you read? America has bumped into Russia. England is bumping into India, rich man bumps into poor man. Those are big collisions, Hally. They make for a lot of bruises. People get hurt in all that bumping, and we're sick and tired of it now. It's been going on for too long. Are we never going to get it right? . . . learn to dance life like champions instead of always being just a bunch of beginners at it?

      I believe Sam is trying to make Hally understand that dancing is not so easy and we all mess up in and we see it all the time and Sam uses imagery and metaphor to explain to Hally what it’s like dancing and you hit a Spector

    33. No, it isn't your imagination hasn't helped you at all. There's a lot more to it than that. We're getting ready for the championships, Hally, not just another dance. There's going to be a lot of people, all right, and they're going to have a good time, but they'll only be spectators, sitting around and watching. It's just the competitors our there on the dance floor. Party decorations and fancy lights all around the hall! The ladies in beautiful evening dresses

      Hally doesn’t take dancing serious as she sees it as a joke.

    34. SAM: No, it isn't your imagination hasn't helped you at all. There's a lot more to it than that. We're getting ready for the championships, Hally, not just another dance. There's going to be a lot of people, all right, and they're going to have a good time, but they'll only be spectators, sitting around and watching. It's just the competitors our there on the dance floor. Party decorations and fancy lights all around the hall! The ladies in beautiful evening dresses! HALLY: My mother's got one of those, Sam, and quite frankly, it's an embarrassment every time she wears it. SAM: [Undeterred.] Your imagination left out the excitement.

      Hally doesn't have any interest in dancing and see's it as joke and waste of time because your just dancing with someone while others are watching and judging you based on your dancing characterization

    35. That's true. It's just that life felt the right size in there . . . not too big and not too small. Wasn't so hard to work up a bit of courage. It's got so bloody complicated since then. [The telephone rings. Sam answers it.]

      this shows the friendship betweeen the two and how close they really are and they dont put each other down

    1. Consistently solicit students'input on the curriculum (e.g., interests, people, or concepts).

      Education does not just work in a teacher to student direction, there has to be some sort of feedback to help form curriculum decision making. Educators have to be willing to listen to students about what they want to learn and how they will learn it. Not to say that the educator must bend to the will of the student, it's that they have to be at least willing to listen and be considerate about what they learn from their pupils.

    1. “The statue being removed is not going to keep anyone from dying,” she said. “It’s not going to save a life.”

      flood the media with preemptive damage control to save face but not actually addressing the issues that got us here.

      the motto of "don't give them anything to say" is just a placebo of a bandaid and doesn't actually say of anything once you consider each individual monument being taken down adn why.

    1. but if you don’t laugh at his jokes, which are really tired, sexist, racist jokes, it’s because you just don’t understand comedy or you need to get a sense of humor,

      I once read that if someone tells you a highly offensive joke, pretend to not know what the joke means and ask for an explanation... Then they'll realize what's up.

    1. Something was wrong, not with her but with the educational regime she was living under. It was a situation that begged for maladjustment, that reminded me of the frustration I felt at being told not to speak Spanish in my classroom.

      The blame again, is to never be put on the oppressed but oppressive systems. It's interesting how easy this is to be forgotten or maybe that just goes along with how oppression works.

    1. “Defining a misbehavior by how it looks tells us nothing about why it occurred and often doesn't help in our behavior-change efforts,” the researchers explain.

      When a student is misbehaving, but you don't know why and you just continue on without figuring it out, then that behavior will reoccur. It is definitely true that if you do not get to the root of the issue it won't be solved. This makes sense because it's like any other problem in life.

    1. So he pulled out a feather and laid it beside the sleeping man. Then he left them and went off a short distance, for he knew that a woman was being formed from the feather. But the man was still asleep and did not know what was happening. When the Bald Eagle decided that the woman was about completed, he returned, awoke the man by flapping his wings over him and flew away.

      This is compelling. It's compelling because there's so much of the bible in this story, specifically in the Book of Genesis, where God created man from mud and molded him. Then, God created man's partner from the man's rib. But, in this story, the Bald Eagle pulled a feather, and let the feather grow into a woman. So there's a little bit of an alteration, but they're so similar. One reason this was so compelling is because it got me thinking that if Salinan Indian tribe just made this up, or had this story passed down from generation to generation, or if the Europeans had shared the Bible with them. It seems most likely that the Europeans shared stories from the Bible and told them to the Salinan Indian tribe, and each generation passed this story down with their own version of the story. The striking similarities gives it away, or could even be a coincidence. Very interesting to learn that native American tribes believed in a higher divine being.

    1. there are some heuristics you can use to guess whether an obsession might be one that matters. For example, it's more promising if you're creating something, rather than just consuming something someone else creates

      uniqueness in creation is surely another factor. If you are creating something in a field that few are in, there's more low hanging fruit to grab

    1. It's important to recognize that cancellations exist to hold people accountable, said Krishauna Hines-Gaither, the associate vice president for diversity, equity, and inclusion at Guilford College in Greensboro, North Carolina, and a cofounder of African American Linguists.

      the issue with this thought is that it is not just about keeping people accountable. It is a tool that can/should be used for good. It is wielded to force an agenda. and to silence the opposition.

    1. What you do need is That Thing; maybe a question, a fear or a fury. It makes your blood boil. It’s all you can talk about when you sit down with your friends over a glass of wine or two or five, or maybe you can’t talk about it with anyone, just your own heart, alone with the impossible architecture of words.

      I find that Stielstra is conveying in this segment, the importance of pathos and a gripping question that entices the reader of a paper and sticks with them long after they read the paper. Her use of the words "fear or a fury" and "makes your blood boil" express how the importance of the essays intro is it's ability to resonate with the reader on an emotional level in any capacity of what they may be passionate about. Although she has a good point as merely informational works can seem monotonous, i think that forming a structure behind writing still has it's importance as pure passion can just seem to be the ramblings of an overtly zealous writer in a stream of conscious. However, what does it take to find the balance between the structure and passion in writing?

    1. Dating apps have become increasingly popular with young people. In 2013, just 5% of youth 18-24 reported that they use mobile dating apps; by 2015, that figure had grown to 22%

      It's important to teach about online safety. Considering our future students won't know life without social media, etc, they probably believe that there is no harm to it. Especially with dating apps (lying about age, lying about who you are, etc.)

    1. How the level of global warming affects impacts and/or risks associated with the Reasons for Concern (RFCs) and selected natural, managed and human systems

      Thinking about climate change can be overwhelming. Looking at facts and figures, hearing stories about our seemingly inevitable fate, and looking at pictures of crisis can send me into a spiral of climate grief that can be immobilizing. Sometimes it's easier to just ignore it. But we can't ignore climate change. It effects us every day if we think about it or not. We need to keep the conversation about climate change going.

    1. The SPP, a feminist digital archive, looks back at the early 1900s in the context of the women’s suffrage movement, a movement that gained momentum in the same historical moment of the Golden Age of postcards and produced hundreds of pro- and anti-suffrage images.

      I think this is significant in looking at the integration of media and politics. Even so long ago people have used media to portray their political stances and it has only grown in our era. Also, I'm currently taking an American Woman History course and we were just shown postcards and currently addressing the topic of woman's suffrage. It's definitely exciting to see an overlap in my courses and this showcases the importance of looking at this digital project.

    1. The results of the effort by all these determined people are publicly-fundedmunicipal as well as national programs for young children that combine theconcept of social services with education. Both education and care are considerednecessary to provide high quality, full-day experiences for young children

      I can't even imagine what that would feel and look like. To live in a country and work for a school that has so much support, especially federal. Just from this first part of the article it is obvious how this country values education, but specifically early childhood education. It's hard not to compare our country and the lack of support. It is no wonder why we struggle to retain teachers in the early childhood field.

    1. What might the horrific image of mindless hordes out to eat our brains represent in the 21st century? It could symbolize whatever we fear will overwhelm and engulf us: epidemic disease, globalization, Islamic fundamentalists, illegal immigrants and refugees. Or it could be something less tangible and more existential: the loss of anonymity and individuality in a complex world, the threat of impersonal technology that makes each of us just another number in an electronic list.

      people are scare of what they don't know and the problem is that they don't take the chance to learn it. The American people think that it's the stranger who is root of all their problems. People always always need somebody to blame

    1. Is the company willing to blockade the entire Google ecosystem to spite Australia?

      Let them. Then Australians can show the world that life goes on without Google. They can demonstrate just how effective the alternatives are. Then people will voluntarily stop using Google. Then Google changes it's business model or goes away.

    1. n when it's newly-washed, smellsof mashed beans and cooked ground beef.

      This almost comes across as a paradox. If she just washed it, how come is smells like food? I believe the author used this to emphasize how hard working she is and that she works constantly.

    2. that begin in the blue morning with my motherputting on her polyester uniform, which,even when it's newly-washed, smellsof mashed beans and cooked ground beef.

      These lines give really strong imagery of just how hard his mom works so that her son can have special items like his sweater. The "blue morning" makes me imagine how her shift starts even before the sun rises. Right before the sun begins to rise the sky slowly fades from dark blue to this true blue color. Her uniform still smelling like the restaurant food, despite it being washed, shows her dedication to providing a happy life for her son.

    1. It seems like this should be one of the easiest things to understand in CSS. If you want a block-level element to fill any remaining space inside of its parent, then it’s simple — just add width: 100% in your CSS declaration for that element, and your problem is solved. Not so fast. It’s not quite that easy. I’m sure CSS developers of all skill levels have attempted something similar to what I’ve just described, with bizarre results ultimately leading to head scratching and shruggingly resorting to experimenting with absolute widths until we find just the right fit. This is just one of those things in CSS that seems easy to understand (and really, it should be), but it’s sometimes not — because of the way that percentages work in CSS.
    1. more or less likely to want to communicate

      Life is about growing and expanding. Sometimes you meet people that just don't function on the same wave length with you and that's okay. I've had to learn to except some people don't like me for who I am. It's not something we should resent about ourselves. Just understand it.

    1. The form of this move can be glimpsed in Guillory’s explanation for the rise of French theory during the period he covers. Theory, according to Guillory, was perfectly in keeping with a “technobureaucratic” turn in intellectual work itself and in the economy overall: “The emergence of theory,” he writes, “is a symptom of a problem which theory itself could not solve.”

      Well, that just seems like a perfectly appropriate exercise of reflexivity — although it's very difficult to understand Guillory's explanation for the rise of French theory from this description of it.

    1. For becoming a man would demand from a woman not only a man’s external appearance but his consciousness as well, that is, the consciousness of one who disposes by right of at least two “natural” slaves during his life span.

      I can't tell if this is denying the trans experience or if it's just saying that you need to be perceived as a man in order to have all of the privileges afforded to men. Or that manliness is defined by the attitude of power over others

    1. President Trump rescinded an executive order early Wednesday morning that had limited federal administration officials from lobbying the government or working for foreign countries after they leave their posts, undoing one of the few measures he had instituted to fulfill his 2016 campaign promise to “drain the swamp.”

      He failed on so many of his campaign promises that it's incredible. The fact that he actively killed one of the few he could have actually upheld is just keeping in line with his lies, lack of transparency, and lack of honor.

    1. Muzzey had hoped that the advancement of technology might make the process easier over time, that tools like ContentID could streamline things for artists. But he says it hasn’t. “I’ve had to come to terms with the fact that this isn’t a blip: this is the new normal, and it’s getting worse, not better,” he says. “Part of that problem is that people like me don’t realize their stuff is out there or think I’m not famous, so how can it be possible, not realizing that if you have a Soundcloud page, your music has been ripped, put into torrents, probably in a TV show in China somewhere, and that’s just how that world works. You don’t realize it until it’s revealed to you layer by layer.”

      There's an interesting information imbalance that creators have with online content. It's easy for their content to travel around, but it's much harder for them to tell where that content has been.

      It would be interesting if more systems used webmention then text creators could include invisible links as a possible solution for those who are too lazy to reformat or strip them out in content farm manner.

    1. Cognitive fusion is a term from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), which refers to a person “fusing together” with the content of a thought or emotion, so that the content is experienced as an objective fact about the world rather than as a mental construct. The most obvious example of this might be if you get really upset with someone else and become convinced that something was all their fault (even if you had actually done something blameworthy too). In this example, your anger isn’t letting you see clearly, and you can’t step back from your anger to question it, because you have become “fused together” with it and experience everything in terms of the anger’s internal logic. Another emotional example might be feelings of shame, where it’s easy to experience yourself as a horrible person and feel that this is the literal truth, rather than being just an emotional interpretation.

      Cognitive Fusion

      Cognitive Fusion is a term that comes from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT).

      CF happens when you identify so strongly with a thought or an emotion that its contents is experienced as the objective way the world is.

      "She is the one" for example is a cognitive fusion.

      The cognitive fusion prevents you from stepping back and examining the construct.

      You experience everything in terms of the belief's internal logic.

    1. This brings me to the fourth pattern of oscillating tension: Shadow values.The pattern goes something like this: We have two values that (without proper planning) tend to be in tension with each other. One of them, we acknowledge, as right and good and ok. One of them we repress, because we think it's bad or weak or evil.Safety vs. AdventureIndependence vs. Love Revenge vs. Acceptance All common examples of value tensions, where one of the values is often in shadow (which one depends on the person).So we end up optimizing for the value we acknowledge. We see adventure as "good", so we optimize for it, hiding from ourselves the fact we care about safety. And man, do we get a lot of adventure. Our adventure meter goes up to 11.But all the while, there's that little safety voice, the one we try ignore. Telling us that there's something we value that we're ignoring. And the more we ignore it, the louder it gets.And meanwhile, because we've gotten so much of it, our adventure voice is getting quieter. It's already up to 11, not a worry right now. Until suddenly, things shift. And where we were going on many adventures, now we just want to stay home, safe. Oscillating tension.

      Shadow Values

      Shadow Values are a pattern of Oscillating Tension.

      When we have two values, one which we make explicit and acknowledge, one which we don't, we might optimize for the one we made explicit.

      This results in our behavior pursuing the maximization of that value, all the while ignoring the implicit one (the shadow value).

      Because this value is getting trampled on, the voice that corresponds to it will start to speak up. The more it gets ignored, the more it speaks up.

      At the same time, the voice corresponding to the value that is getting maximized, becomes quiet. It's satisfied where it is.

      We find ourselves in a place where all we want to do is tend to the value that is not being met.

    1. He theorised at length about the preservative properties of the cold in his History of Life and Death, enthusiasticallyremarkingthat fruits and nuts have been known to have fallen in the snow, or have sometimes been buried in purpose built ice vaults. When recovered months laterthey have been found to be “as fresh and fine as if they had been picked yesterday.”

      One of the odder aspects of cryonics unpopularity is the simplicity of the logic involved. Suspect most of the problem is just expense, most people don't understand that it's financed through life insurance etc. Cremation was once considered taboo and heartless, but over time gained acceptance (I speculate/infer) because it was cheaper than a funeral.

  6. doc-00-2o-docs.googleusercontent.com doc-00-2o-docs.googleusercontent.com
    1. Grad school can be stressful enough during normal times, but it's likely worse during a global pandemic. You may be (or know) someone who has lost their job, tested positive for COVID-19, been hospitalized, or taken on new family responsibilities. Not only this, but there are other ongoing events that are constant reminders of inequalities and injustices you may be facing.I am fully committed to making sure that you learn everything you were hoping to learn from this class! Although formal deadlines are an important part of giving structure to a class, my late policy and willingness to make accommodations are pretty generous even during normal times, and if this pandemic (or anything else) is turning your life upside down, I'm willing to be as flexible as you need me to be. I have also adjusted the weekly activities for the course so that some are optional. I think all of the activities are worth completing, but this isn't the semester to be picky about that. If you feel like you're behind, not understanding everything, or just plain stressed, do not suffer in silence!I'm pretty quick to respond to email and more than happy to meet with you

      Thanks for this! These are crazy times.

    1. particularly from the West

      So Thai people can't just hate their government, it's always the west this, the west that. I believe Thai people can think for themselves, especially if it concerns their wellbeing. Period.

    1. News is that part of communication that keeps us informed of the changing events, issues, and characters in the world outside.

      This is a key point to mention, the news is a double edged sword in this regard. As the news is so readily accessible in this day and age, it can be beneficial to hear, but it can also be damaging. I think it is a good thing to broaden news sources so that it's not coming from just a single place. Bias is a thing, and news sources love to portray information in their own lens.

    1. philosophy, his­tory, and psychology

      Is he just saying that it's just not reductive to these three things? But that it is the gestalt of all of them applied to the Christian religion?

    2. man and of man to God.

      This sentence and the sentence above it is one of the most profound pieces I've seen about theology. I think it's lurking unspoken in the writing of Jenson and perhaps Barth. It means that the object of theology is not just the entity of God, nor is it merely the human experience of God and faith. It's about explaining the content of the relation of humans to God, and God to humans. And, once this is thought about, one comes to realize that theology could not be anything else. It could not be about God as God, because theology uses language and human reason, which necessarily implies some set of assumptions about the relationship between God and humans. It implies that God is something that can be spoken of by humans, that he can be accurately discussed. The very fact that we speak about him at all means that God is the sort of thing that Humans can in some way understand. This is the case even if one tries to speak apophatically, because then one delimits the being of God by defining what he isn't, and that necessarily implies something positive about his reality. So, theology is necessarily about explaining how exactly God relates to human beings, and this is the most basic and visceral object of theology. It is what comes before any talk about God as God, and it is what comes before any talk about humans as humans.

      Thus, the issue for Christians will quickly become, what is the nature of the relationship between God and humans? Is it the Triune God as Jenson would be inclined to say, or is Christ, as Barth would want to say?

      Also, this is x/ne because I didn't see that he was saying that this is NOT the object of Theology.

    3. heology is a historical science,

      I want to emphasize that historical need not mean or imply pastness. It merely implies a material, historical entity, an event that may be in the past, but just as easily may lie in the present or future. The point is that it's determinable, able to be discussed and spoken of. In this way, I don't see, yet, how this is at all incompatible with Barth's view of the subject.

    Annotators

    1. Mary Karr: I used to do this thing. Yeah, that’s so funny. I used to do this thing where I would stage a fight in my class with someone who was opposite from me. And so let’s say like my colleague, George Saunders, who is just the sweetest guy, I can’t even tell you. I was in the car with him once and there was a bug on his shirt and I was like, “George, there’s a big beetle on your shirt.” And he’d be like, “Well, he has to be somewhere.” I’d be like, “Kill it.” And he’s like this Tibetan Buddhist with this amazing practice, just the sweetest guy. So George comes in and starts arguing with me that my classroom is in fact his classroom and— Tim Ferriss: This is in front of all the students? Mary Karr: In front of all the students. And it’s for them it’s the first day of school, and it’s like having their parents fight. And I script it so that I say only nice, conciliatory things. I back up, he walks forward. He’s bigger than I am. And then it ends with him throwing the papers up and telling me to go fuck myself or something. And/or telling me to go hang maybe, I don’t know if you can say the F-word, can you say the F-word? Tim Ferriss: F-word is not only allowed, but endorsed— Mary Karr: Okay, good. Tim Ferriss: —since I grew up on Long Island, you’re in good company. Mary Karr: I feel so much better! Just telling me to go fuck myself. And then we asked the students to write. So let’s say there are 17, 18 students in this class, or 20, somewhere between 15 and 22. And they’re all smart, and they’re all young. They were all incredibly juiced on adrenaline and cortisol because they were scared and it’s a public scene. And they don’t really know each other that well. And they don’t know us that well. So they’re all extremely alert. They’re hypervigilant. And we ask them to write down what happens. And everybody writes something just a little different. Interestingly, people will describe me in very aggressive terms. Like even though I’m the one backing up and I’m saying, “Well, I can clear out during the break, George, but like, I don’t understand why you’re so upset.” And he’ll say, “You don’t understand why I’m so…” I mean, and he walks forward and I’m backing up and my head is down and I’m every conciliatory gesture I can think of. And people will say, “She stood her ground like a bulldog,” or “She had military strength, facing off against him.” And one year I did it with my student assistant, who was an undergraduate, just a beautiful young track star, Betsy. And Betsy just threw her papers up in the air and was screeching at me. Well, she’s this kid, and here I am, this professor with fancy clothes in a position of power. So people would, in that class of undergraduates, assume that I had done horrible things to Betsy that had—in one class there was a young woman. One of the ruses I set up is that I leave my cell phone on so I can start to argue with George before he comes in and then ask the students, “How often did he call? How long between each call?” And ask them to guess things or remember things about time. And some people say, “He called three times.” Some people will say, “He called once.” Some people, “Four times.” So all those details are very influenced by who they are. The young woman with sickle cell anemia will have this enormous compassion for me, because I’ll say, “I have to leave my phone on, I’m waiting for medical results.” And she’ll assume I’m waiting to hear if I have some awful ailment. And she sees George as a complete beast. And me as this woman, perhaps ill, who dragged herself to class, while everybody else in the class thinks, “What a diva, she’s answering her phone in the middle of class. She can’t wait an hour to get medical results? I mean, come on.” So there are always people in class who have eidetic, who have those perfect memories. I remember one kid—often they’re musicians—this kid was a jazz saxophone player who was very famous in Brooklyn for giving these amazing house parties. I think he made a living giving house parties for like, I don’t know, years. So this kid had this amazing memory. We had a script and he remembered the script exactly. He remembered what George had on. He remembered where we stood. He remembered that I’d backed up every step. And then when he wrote it, he wrote it exactly as it happened, he didn’t miss anything. And he said, “George was the aggressor, but I wonder what she’d done to make him act that way.” I guess the purpose of the exercise is for you to realize that you remember through a filter of who you are. Memory is not a computer. It’s not a perfect storage system. Obviously we, even these fine minds of these young people, very alert and paying attention in their first class and wanting to get everything right, and do well, misremember. But what’s more, what I want them to think about is how they are not just perceiving things, but beaming the world, the landscape, into being with whoever they are inside. It’s important, as a writer of anything, to realize what kind of filters you’re strapping on that prevent you from seeing what’s going on.

      How our experiences color our memories and what and how much we remember. There's a filter on memories. A lens. What someone remembers, even immediately after the event, is not necessarily to be trusted. Because they could be remembering only portion of it. Or giving it their own color and thus distorting the reality. With that said, there is not one common shared reality. All the reality is being seen through filters of the people present. It makes sense to have three oracles instead of one like in the Tom cruise movie.

    1. In fact, it might very well be the case that, while finding that within narrowly defined categories ideas are getting harder to find, new ideas in general are getting easier to find over time, since we can now use all of the technology we invented previously and all of the scientific knowledge we collected to help us find them.

      I think what you show here is weaker than how this section seems to be about. It's not true that individual case studies aren't relevant, it's just that it's restricting their claim to "in each category, eventually ideas are getting harder to find" where case studies are extremely relevant.

    1. It’s going to take a long time before we feel strong again.

      Just like it took her a long time to recover, in other words saying that America is so incredibly divided right now and this past year has been difficult for everyone

    1. Engaging in computational analysis requires a digital historian to create datasets, and data needs definition to be processed. Forcing uncertain information into a fixed value, such as a date or specific place, when source material may not offer that certainty creates tension for historians and may mean that a specific digital method cannot reasonably be employed as means for analysis.

      This is important for a lot of other reasons too. It was touched on a bit in the other reading, but one has to be careful the story one uses the data to tell, and it's also why everything should be preserved not just specific ones that fit the narrative.Otherwise, we run the risk of history becoming only what we choose to preserve, rather than what actually happened.

    1. THE WORLD LIES WITHIN REACHas never before.

      For some reason I'm just thinking about "transnational turn". It's amazing that places around the globe now get connected. It must have been unimaginable not long ago.

    1. If a Service Worker fails, it’s possible to break an entire website in ways that we can’t fix on the server side (or at least, not right away). Imagine this: your site appears to be down, but refreshing the page won’t help, because the browser isn’t even talking to your server; it’s just talking to your broken Service Worker.
    1. The kind of listening you need to learn is not passive absorption, like watching TV; it is critical listening. Critical listening means that you are not just hearing but thinking about what you are hearing.

      I think for many of us who are growing up with different new forms of media we may find that we start to listen less critically and maybe even think less critically. Technology, while it does have it’s benefits like furthering our education online during a global pandemic, it’s perhaps allowed information to be so obtainable that we don’t even think twice about what we see. What I urge students going into university or college is to not mildly acknowledge what your teacher is saying but connect the information and really think about it.

  7. www.pbs.org www.pbs.org
    1. CECE MOORE (Genetic Genealogist): We inherit our DNA from both of our parents: 50 percent from mom, 50 percent from dad. And they inherited it from their parents; and their parents, of course, inherited it from their parents.NARRATOR: Our parents each contribute about 50 percent to our DNA. And the same is true for them and their parents. So, the amount of DNA we inherit from any ancestor drops by half with each preceding generation.We also share DNA with anyone who shares a common ancestor with us: siblings, half-siblings, first cousins, second cousins and so on. The way that the D.T.C.s determine those relationships is by comparing people’s DNA. The amount that is shared is measured in a unit called centimorgans.CECE MOORE: The more centimorgans two people share, the closer they are related. And the fewer centimorgans they share, the more distantly related they are.NARRATOR: But with the D.T.C.s, a relationship to someone can’t always be determined just by counting centimorgans, because the numbers fall within ranges. You might share the same number with a cousin and a great-uncle, for example.ELLEN GREYTAK (Parabon NanoLabs): Just because you have an amount of shared DNA doesn’t mean you actually know, for sure, what that person’s relationship is. It’s just a probability, a spectrum of possible relationships.
    1. But both overlook one key development: in a world where everyone is an entrepreneur, it’s hard work getting others excited about funding your project. Money goes to those who know how to attract attention.

      Author argues that grabbing people's attention and interest is just as important as the actual funding platform itself. This is especially true in the digital Internet age. You can have a great product, but without good advertising, there may be little to no backing from investors.

    1. When you're starting on an open source project, it's important to record what your community (this might just be you at the beginning) decides to work on! A roadmap organizes the tasks that nees to be done on a project around milestones. This helps potential contributors understand the current status of your poject and where it's going next.

      It's important for an open source project to record what the community decides to work on in order to organize the tasks that need to be completed to reach a milestone and to help potential contributors understand the current status of the project and where it's headed.

    1. Podcast: It’s Been a Minute with Sam Sanders, December 4 episode

      I am grateful that I got the chance to listen to the interviews in the podcast, and that it happened in the beginning of this course. Although I have been personally impacted by COVID-19, listening to the stories of other people made me realize how much more they have suffered during the last several months. It truly expanded my views and made me recognize that the impact of the pandemic has been such widespread and complex and far beyond just a physical sickness. The separation and the loss of loved ones, the loss of jobs and housing, the emotional toll, depression, anxiety are just a few examples mentioned by the podcast participants within the scope of Covid-19. What made me hopeful was that both the youngest and the oldest participants expressed enthusiasm and were able to still identify good things despite the challenges. Not losing hope, “picking up the pieces” and going on, holding on to our own unique “things” that make us stronger was a really valuable advice.

    1. /A purposefully vague name as to not overly constrain our scope. Yes, I could research whatever I want. Yes, I could hire a team.

      /domes are necessary

      /Alan and Vishal take a “People, not projects” approach to research, and showed great trust in hiring and funding us in a way that wasn’t attached to any particular project or outcome. I’ve since come to better understand their view on pure, long-horizon research. If you’re looking to invent entirely new ideas, you can’t define your research within the bounds of existing ideas. You have to choose people to trust, and then trust them. You have to support them even when you don’t quite understand what they’re doing.

      /lift all of humanity and expand our ability to understand the world

      /mental technology: computational thinking

      /the value of including intangible skills when we think about and research about technology

      /Skills, techniques, and cultural practices, in the history of science, and mathematics, and the arts, that are continually expanding what it means to be human. It’s a supremely optimistic view.

      /What else is out there and how do we imagine it?

      /What if Turing’s work, as with Lovelace’s, didn’t find the support necessary to follow it up? How long would we have had to wait this time?

      /But this didn’t quite feel right, as it would be addressing a current educational need rather than taking the kind of long view I was just starting to understand.

      /Reza Sarhengi, who was a mathematics professor, an artist, musician, and the founder and president of Bridges, a mathematics and art conference and community.

      /It wasn’t about making our conference look very impressive in one snapshot of time, but about creating a context where folks can immerse themselves in new ways of thinking. I saw myself, and others around me, grow from being wide-eyed beginners to being the experts and mentors who create the environment that lets the next group of beginners learn.

      /These things had more of an influence on me than I realized at the time, because the mental superpower of algorithmic thinking doesn’t require a computer to work.

      /And suddenly ten years later my job was to help create a research culture, one where new researchers would naturally develop into people capable of thinking new thinks! A culture that is focused on the longer term, on process instead of on products, something more like Bridges culture and less like startup culture. But how?

      /but every time I saw them they shed art as if it were a natural byproduct of human existence like an exhalation

    1. So the issue really is data, a very messy data data standardization problem. So every state is charged. You know, much like in the insurance world, states have a lot of power here. And in the US, every state is charged with issuing out the public health information and publishing it. But they're not told how to publish it, in what form to make it available. They just put it up on their website. And so accessibility becomes how you access the website? Sure, you can pull it up and look at it. That's unstructured data. But how do you download the active data that you need in a timely fashion? It's not like there's easy dashboard data to download. It's not like it's easily aggregated or sortable. Every state has their own choice about how to do this, there isn't a standard.

      Issue with public health data today

    1. them guiding the student t

      Does the "guiding the student" task extend a beyond just course content?

      When I hear that I think of the old distance education study guide. Which guided the student throughout the entire course and all the activities they had to do: content, interaction etc.

      At some level the study guide is content, but it's more a wrapper/environment around all of the activities. Hence there might be a couple of quite separate tasks that need to be talked about.

      Which current has my thinking that acquisition is probably a better term than course content

    2. Development time has been shortened as courses need to become more agile and pushed out faster than ever

      Important need for learning design. A need we face. But is this the only need?

      We can use it in our projects, but those projects can't scale to every teacher or course. What do they do? Goodyear argues that design for learning is a way for teachers to save the time challenge they are facing in higher ed (echoing the above need).

      Is there an approach to design for learning that a sole teacher would adopt. There are some that (could) do design, but there are many others that don't/won't. How to get to them?

      Just checked and most of this is echoing questions I raised in response to Joyce's talk.

      Save time in teaching

      Echoing the forward-oriented design idea, it's not just development that has become time constrained. Everything about teaching is time constrained, but at the same time is getting more complex for all the reasons Goodyear points out but also because the technological and support systems put in place by institutions aren't helping with this.

    1. Yet the pausing of donations announced by many companies – including Marriott, American Express, AT&T, JPMorgan Chase, Dow, American Airlines, and others – was unlikely to deliver a serious blow to Republicans in Congress who voted to overturn Mr. Biden’s win.“These are symbolic pledges,” said Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan group that traces the role money plays in politics. “This is just one source of revenue and for some it’s vanishingly small, particularly in the Senate.”
    1. To Read the Full Story

      From (https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3175273/replies/58488734):

      On Doug Sweet's first trip to the U.S. Capitol, as a 13-year-old in 1975, he tilted his head back, gazed up at the glistening white dome and thought it was the most awesome thing he had ever seen. On his second trip to the Capitol, he joined a mob of Trump supporters who smashed their way into the seat of the U.S. Congress, and finished his visit handcuffed facedown on the floor. The 45-year journey between those two visits was marked by bright idealism and belief in dark conspiracies, by a solitary existence and a newfound fraternity with those convinced there is no way Joe Biden beat Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election.

      The mob that stormed the Capitol last Wednesday was a combustible stew of QAnon conspiracy theorists, armed rampagers and extremist personalities, as well as more ordinary Trump loyalists determined to fulfill the president's desire to persuade or intimidate lawmakers into undoing his election loss. Among those who have been arrested are a leader of the far-right Proud Boys for his alleged role in the siege, and an online provocateur and white nationalist who before the attack warned of rioting if the results weren't overturned who live-streamed from inside House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's office.

      Mr. Sweet and a friend, Cindy Fitchett of Mathews, Va., first visited the Ellipse, where President Donald Trump told his supporters that the election had been stolen and that he planned to walk with them along Pennsylvania Avenue to take their anger to the Capitol.

      "We fight like hell," the president said. "And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore."

      People waving Trump flags and wearing MAGA hats were swarming the bleachers erected for Mr. Biden's inauguration. They were scrambling up the walls. Rioters had overrun Capitol Police and forced their way into the building. Mr. Sweet could hear the thuds and see the smoke from flash-bang grenades going off inside. He says he hesitated. He says he felt the need to go inside to share his views with Congress but wanted to consult God first. He prayed aloud: "Lord, is this the right thing to do? Is this what I need to do?" He says he felt God's hand on his back, pushing him forward.

      "I checked with the Lord," he says. "I checked with Him three times. I never heard a 'No.'"

      They walked in and, he says, found themselves in a whirlwind of broken glass and debris. He says he was shocked; the event on the Ellipse had been all picnic blankets and puppy dogs. This was an orgy of destruction.

      Robyn Sweet, now 35 and the operator of a group home for disabled adults, says she has been saddened and puzzled to see her father's views grow more extreme. She says she loves him and still sees his good qualities, calling him "charismatic, lovable and funny outside of all this." Yet she says he has become someone she doesn't quite recognize.

      "I don't know this person anymore," she says. "It's almost like a lot of these middle-aged white men are afraid, I'm not really quite sure of what, but it's like they're paranoid...It's mass hysteria." She says their relationship has become increasingly strained "because it just seems so crazy some of the stuff he would talk about."

      Ms. Sweet marched in support of Black Lives Matter in June after the killing of George Floyd in police custody, and started a Facebook page to highlight bigotry. She says her father supported her exercise of her constitutional right to free speech, but some people "in his camp" began accusing her of "being antifa," a loose collection of sometimes-violent left-wing activists. "She's caught up in the idea that BLM goes into cities and helps Black children," Mr. Sweet says with a wheezy laugh. "I wish they did. I would get behind that," he says. "She's really hard to the left," Mr. Sweet says of his daughter. "I'm really hard to the right. We're polar opposites. But I love her."

      https://www.wsj.com/articles/one-trump-fans-descent-into-the-u-s-capitol-mob-11610311660

    2. From (https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3175273/replies/58488734):

      On Doug Sweet's first trip to the U.S. Capitol, as a 13-year-old in 1975, he tilted his head back, gazed up at the glistening white dome and thought it was the most awesome thing he had ever seen. On his second trip to the Capitol, he joined a mob of Trump supporters who smashed their way into the seat of the U.S. Congress, and finished his visit handcuffed facedown on the floor. The 45-year journey between those two visits was marked by bright idealism and belief in dark conspiracies, by a solitary existence and a newfound fraternity with those convinced there is no way Joe Biden beat Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election.

      The mob that stormed the Capitol last Wednesday was a combustible stew of QAnon conspiracy theorists, armed rampagers and extremist personalities, as well as more ordinary Trump loyalists determined to fulfill the president's desire to persuade or intimidate lawmakers into undoing his election loss. Among those who have been arrested are a leader of the far-right Proud Boys for his alleged role in the siege, and an online provocateur and white nationalist who before the attack warned of rioting if the results weren't overturned who live-streamed from inside House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's office.

      Mr. Sweet and a friend, Cindy Fitchett of Mathews, Va., first visited the Ellipse, where President Donald Trump told his supporters that the election had been stolen and that he planned to walk with them along Pennsylvania Avenue to take their anger to the Capitol.

      "We fight like hell," the president said. "And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore."

      People waving Trump flags and wearing MAGA hats were swarming the bleachers erected for Mr. Biden's inauguration. They were scrambling up the walls. Rioters had overrun Capitol Police and forced their way into the building. Mr. Sweet could hear the thuds and see the smoke from flash-bang grenades going off inside. He says he hesitated. He says he felt the need to go inside to share his views with Congress but wanted to consult God first. He prayed aloud: "Lord, is this the right thing to do? Is this what I need to do?" He says he felt God's hand on his back, pushing him forward.

      "I checked with the Lord," he says. "I checked with Him three times. I never heard a 'No.'"

      They walked in and, he says, found themselves in a whirlwind of broken glass and debris. He says he was shocked; the event on the Ellipse had been all picnic blankets and puppy dogs. This was an orgy of destruction.

      Robyn Sweet, now 35 and the operator of a group home for disabled adults, says she has been saddened and puzzled to see her father's views grow more extreme. She says she loves him and still sees his good qualities, calling him "charismatic, lovable and funny outside of all this." Yet she says he has become someone she doesn't quite recognize.

      "I don't know this person anymore," she says. "It's almost like a lot of these middle-aged white men are afraid, I'm not really quite sure of what, but it's like they're paranoid...It's mass hysteria." She says their relationship has become increasingly strained "because it just seems so crazy some of the stuff he would talk about."

      Ms. Sweet marched in support of Black Lives Matter in June after the killing of George Floyd in police custody, and started a Facebook page to highlight bigotry. She says her father supported her exercise of her constitutional right to free speech, but some people "in his camp" began accusing her of "being antifa," a loose collection of sometimes-violent left-wing activists. "She's caught up in the idea that BLM goes into cities and helps Black children," Mr. Sweet says with a wheezy laugh. "I wish they did. I would get behind that," he says. "She's really hard to the left," Mr. Sweet says of his daughter. "I'm really hard to the right. We're polar opposites. But I love her."

      https://www.wsj.com/articles/one-trump-fans-descent-into-the-u-s-capitol-mob-11610311660

    1. WHAT IS MONEY?Money is, and has always been, technology. Specifically, money is technology for making our wealth today available for consumption tomorrow. Modern Americans with a ‘What’s water?’ mindset about money – virtually all of us – assume there is a sharp line of distinction between what is money and what is not. That’s false. Instead, throughout history, various monies (note: plural) have always existed1 – simultaneously – along a continuum of soundness, subject to competitive monetary network effects. Sound money – along with language – were the first, and have forever been the most important, human networks responsible for human flourishing. Imagine life without them.

      Language and Money are two human networks that are responsible for our baseline well being.

      Bitcoin is the intersection of these two concepts.

      Language has allowed us to communicate in a way that allows us to live in larger groups. Oral language gives us the ability to interact moment to moment. Written language gives us the ability to communicate over time and space.

      Bitcoin is a merger of money into the language of computation. This merger is a new formation that connects language and money. We've moved into a new paradigm that gives a new world of opportunity. Money has always had limitations which is why we have adapted it's system over time. It's ever evolving, just like language. Now they are one of the same.

    1. Running all that manually (more than 100 scripts across all devices) is an awful job for a human. I want to set them up once and more or less forget about it, only checking now and then.

      My ideals for all of my regular processes and servers:

      • Centralized configuration and control - I want to go into a folder and configure everything I'm running everywhere.
      • Configuration file has the steps needed to set up from scratch - so I can just back up the configuration and data folders and not worry about backing up the programs.
      • Control multiple machines from the central location. Dictate where tasks can run.
      • [nice to have] Allow certain tasks to running externally, e.g. in AWS ECS or Lambda or similar
      • Command-line access for management (web is great for monitoring)
      • Flexible scheduling (from strict every minute to ~daily)
      • Support for daemons, psuedo-daemons (just run repeatedly with small delays), and periodic tasks.
      • Smart alerts - some processes can fail occasionally, but needs to run at least once per day - some processes should never fail. A repeating inaccurate alert is usually just as bad as no alert at all.
      • Error code respect (configurable)
      • Logs - store the program output, organize it, keep it probably in a date-based structure
      • Health checks - if it's a web server, is it still responding to requests? Has it logged something recently? Touched a database file? If not, it's probably dead.
      • Alerts support in Telegram and email
      • Monitor details about the run - how long did it take? How much CPU did it use? Has it gotten slower over time?
      • Dashboard - top-level stats, browse detailed run stats and logs

      So much of the configuration/control stuff screams containers, so more and more I'm using Docker for my scripts, even simpler ones.

      I'm pretty sure a lot of this is accomplished by existing Docker orchestration tools. Been delaying that rabbit hole for a long time.

      I think the key thing that makes this not just a "cron" problem for me, is I want something that monitors and manages both itself and the tasks I want to run, including creating/setting up if not already. I also want to ideally focus my mental energy into a single controller that handles my "keep this running" things all together, be they servers or infrequent tasks.

      Doesn't have to be a single project. Might be multiple pieces glued together somehow.

    1. Second, decentralization: Urbit IDs are distributed by a sponsorship tree. Each sponsor issues a fixed number of addresses. Since there are lots of sponsors, there are lots of ways to get an Urbit ID — not just one central authority. Once you get one, it’s yours forever. One point that’s useful to understand about sponsors is that while Urbit IDs always need a sponsor, or parent node on the network (primarily for peer discovery), it’s always possible to change sponsors and sponsors can always reject children. This means bad actors can be banned and abusive sponsors can be ignored. We think this strikes a nice balance between accountability and freedom.

      This thing surely is going somewhere

    1. Annotating here. I’m guessing it’s going to cause a lot of anxiety and frustration and non-participation, since the interface is a bit unintuitive, and your students tend to have a low frustration tolerance and low figuring-it-out on their own skill level. Once they get it down, it might be okay, but it might be easier to just copy the text you want into a private shared google page or similar entity, and have them edit that.

    1. It’s not enough to tell students in advance exactly what’s expected of them.  “When school is seen as a test, rather than an adventure in ideas,” teachers may persuade themselves they’re being fair “if they specify, in listlike fashion, exactly what must be learned to gain a satisfactory grade…[but] such schooling is unfair in the wider sense that it prepares students to pass other people’s tests without strengthening their capacity to set their own assignments in collaboration with their fellows” (Nicholls and Hazzard, 1993, p. 77).

      I had a professor once that did this just like every other professor but at the end of every test quiz or final. He put a question that said something along the lines of "in this section tell me about anything else you studied or learned from this course that was not of the test". He would take these questions in consideration when delivering final grades. I thought this was a great way to let the student show what they have learned.

    2. There is certainly value in assessing the quality of learning and teaching, but that doesn’t mean it’s always necessary, or even possible, to measure those things

      I agree that there is value and that we have to be able to show what the person has learned. However I don't believe just having test is a good way to measure this.

    3. Kids were stressed out and also preferred to avoid intellectual risks.  “They’ll take an easier assignment that will guarantee the A.”

      i can relate to this -- sometimes it's hard for me believe de-grading/ungrading, but i know it's just because the grading system has been programmed into me for all of my life. there's definitely lots of unlearning to do on teachers' and students' ends!

    1. it's not effective even if if it were desirable anyway

      Again, this is where Glenn loses me the most. There's no reason Twitter needs to allow Trump to use their service, which has certain properties that make it in many ways much more powerful than Fox or Newsmax or a white house press conference, just because he also has those outlets.

    1. https://outline.com/tan7Ej

      Why Do People love Kungfustory?

      It’s well-established among the original novel/translating community that Kungfustory.com is the best.

      Kungfustory.com is just a place where Kungfustory can be hosted. It’s very user-friendly for readers, with a superb app that functions very well and reliably on phones. It’s easy to compile a list of reads, to know when those reads have been recently updated, and to follow along your favorite story.

      Select any genre you like: romance, stories with reborn heroes, magical realism, eastern fantasy the world of wuxia, horror stories, romantic love novels, fanfiction, sci-fi.

      New chapters added daily, Never be bored with new addictive plots and new worlds.

      https://www.kungfustory.com/

    1. Why Do People love Kungfustory?

      It’s well-established among the original novel/translating community that Kungfustory.com is the best.

      Kungfustory.com is just a place where Kungfustory can be hosted. It’s very user-friendly for readers, with a superb app that functions very well and reliably on phones. It’s easy to compile a list of reads, to know when those reads have been recently updated, and to follow along your favorite story.

      Select any genre you like: romance, stories with reborn heroes, magical realism, eastern fantasy the world of wuxia, horror stories, romantic love novels, fanfiction, sci-fi.

      New chapters added daily, Never be bored with new addictive plots and new worlds.

      https://www.kungfustory.com/

    1. heart disease kills more blacks every year than whites [18] (despite the fact that whites make up almost 80 percent of the total US populace, and blacks comprise slightly more than 13 percent).

      A very surprising statistic that I never would’ve know until reading the article. It just goes to show that some communities are given privileges that others don’t have. It’s something that needs to change.

    1. You’ll also find that it’s much easier to write this document at the beginning of the project when your excitement and motivation are at their highest. Retroactively writing a Readme is an absolute drag, and you’re sure to miss all kinds of important details when you do so.

      This is such a key point to consider. If you've spent all of your precious initial energy on implementing the project, writing a README/documentation after that will just be a headache that you may not even have the motivation to complete effectively.

    1. For instance, if you rush to give first aid to someone injured on the street, then your ‘tangible’ impact is whatever help you deliver to the injured person. However, your counterfactual impact depends on what would have happened if you hadn’t acted. For instance, if there was someone else in the crowd better qualified to give first aid, then by stepping in, you might have made the situation worse rather than better. So, it’s possible to have a negative counterfactual impact while having a positive tangible impact.This means that thoroughly considering counterfactuals can have a significant effect on which actions seem best. For instance, considering counterfactuals shows that it’s easier to set back a field than it first seems, because, for instance, if you start a new project, you also need to consider whether you might thereby prevent someone else from setting up an even better version of it. It also makes it look more important to work in neglected areas where someone else won’t do what you would have done anyway.

      I honestly think that this is filled with an undue sense of inferiority.

      With the first example on first aid;

      1. Consider the bystander effect. It is incredibly unlikely that someone will actually take initiative to help -- at most, someone might just call an ambulance. Simply taking initiative, even if it is limited only to giving requests for help, is a huge positive

      2. I also think that the author overestimates how many people are good at first aid, and even more the number of people who are good at first aid and take initiative

      As for the second example;

      Starting a project does NOT prevent others from starting similar projects. You will always find several businesses / projects on the same topic.

      You could argue that no one can use the resources you've "wasted" but someone would have eventually used it, and that person could be a psychopath.

      Besides, what makes YOU think that you are not one of the best people for the project? Even if you are not the best in a global sense, you can still be the best one locally. (e.g. you are not a Nobel prize winning economist, but you are the most qualified applicant for the project)

      Lastly, the fact that you are willing to consider this advice means that you are probably better than most for it. Telling people not to be narcissists nor to be abusive does not work on narcissists and abusers, it does however affect everyone else

    1. You can style a link to look button-like Perhaps some of the confusion between links and buttons is stuff like this: <img loading="lazy" src="https://i1.wp.com/css-tricks.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Screen-Shot-2020-01-08-at-8.55.49-PM.png?resize=264%2C142&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-301534" width="264" height="142" data-recalc-dims="1" />Very cool “button” style from Katherine Kato. That certainly looks like a button! Everyone would call that a button. Even a design system would likely call that a button and perhaps have a class like .button { }. But! A thing you can click that says “Learn More” is very much a link, not a button. That’s completely fine, it’s just yet another reminder to use the semantically and functionally correct element.
    1. Reviewer #2:

      The paper submitted by Girard-Buttoz and colleagues asks whether and how early maternal loss affects cortisol levels and diurnal slopes among wild chimpanzees at Tai Forest, Côte d'Ivoire. The major claim of the paper is that, like humans, chimpanzees experience altered HPA functioning after maternal loss, including alterations to both diurnal slope and overall cortisol levels. However, their chimpanzee orphans exhibited patterns in diurnal slope that were opposite to their predictions (predicted blunted slopes, observed steeper slopes). The authors should be commended for their efforts in collecting a large number of samples for this analysis. However, I am not convinced that it is sufficient for investigating the hypotheses put forth here and, therefore I am also not convinced that their results are solid. I also have concerns about the theoretical grounding for the paper.

      1) My principal concerns with this paper, as written, revolve around the methods/results. First and foremost, I am not convinced that the authors have the sufficient sample size to evaluate the predictions/hypotheses outlined in the introduction. While 849 urine samples is a large number, and again, their efforts here should be commended, the sample spread is actually quite thin once it is spliced up into appropriate categories, especially considering how many samples were collected per individual year, on average. As the authors indicate throughout and especially when describing their modeling approach, cortisol is inherently a very noisy hormone impacted by myriad factors- including age in at least one other densely-sampled chimpanzee community. I'm also surprised that time of day was modeled quadratically. It is my understanding that humans, other populations of chimpanzees, and other mammals follow a sigmoidal curve which should be modeled with a third-order term as well. For these reasons, it's difficult to tell whether model 1A is not significant because of insufficient sample or a true lack of predictive power. Additionally, I'm concerned that the paper seems to focus so much on the results from a single model term in a model that did not reach significance.

      2) Despite acknowledging that the "significance of these predictors should be interpreted with caution" because model 1a did not reach significance, the authors make very strong claims about the results in the discussion- and also feature the finding of that model in the title of the paper. That seems problematic to me- especially because the insignificant model results (more intense diurnal slopes among immature orphans) diverge from the expectations set forth by other works in humans and non-humans. The finding that this is to do with higher-than-expected morning cortisol is puzzling given that evening levels are generally considered more responsive or plastic. However, this could also be an artefact of fitting the models without the third-order term for time.

      3) The introduction needs refinement to help clarify and specify the authors' arguments.

      (a) Does the biological embedding model always lead to negative fitness outcomes? Or is it possible that phenotypic adjustments might be adaptive, or even just making the best of a bad job (e.g. earlier death, but not death today)?

      (b) Throughout the introduction it is unclear whether and where the authors refer to the human clinical literature as opposed to animal literature. It is also unclear how human patterns are similar versus different from those observed in animals. Further, I would recommend that the authors include a deeper review of the animal literature (e.g. early experimental work with macaques, cortisol at other chimpanzee field sites/captivity). It's also unclear whether and where the authors refer more broadly to early life adversity (and what this means for humans vs. animals) versus more specifically to maternal loss. Additionally, there should be further discussion specifically related early maternal loss (rather than "early life adversity" which can include a lot of different factors) focused on the nutritional and social obstacles associated with early maternal loss, how these related to HPA functioning, and how these effects are expected to change during development (Plasticity? Flexibility? The role of HPA in responding to changing environmental conditions?). What about the adaptive calibration model which posits that the HPA can readjust during particular periods of developmental reorganization?

      4) It is difficult to assess the discussion without first dealing with the problems in the introduction/methods. However, despite their claims in the results section, it does not seem that the authors interpreted the results of model 1a with caution.

    1. The debate about whether a button or link should be used to download a file is a bit silly, as the whole purpose of a link has always been to download content. HTML is a file, and like all other files, it needs to be retrieved from a server and downloaded before it can be presented to a user. The difference between a Photoshop file, HTML, and other understood media files, is that a browser automatically displays the latter two. If one were to link to a Photoshop .psd file, the browser would initiate a document change to render the file, likely be all like, “lol wut?” and then just initiate the OS download prompt. The confusion seems to come from developers getting super literal with the “links go places, buttons perform actions.” Yes, that is true, but links don’t actually go anywhere. They retrieve information and download it. Buttons perform actions, but they don’t inherently “get” documents. While they can be used to get data, it’s often to change state of a current document, not to retrieve and render a new one. They can get data, in regards to the functionality of forms, but it continues to be within the context of updating a web document, not downloading an individual file. Long story short, the download attribute is unique to anchor links for a reason. download augments the inherent functionality of the link retrieving data. It side steps the attempt to render the file in the browser and instead says, “You know what? I’m just going to save this for later…”
    1. Another thing to try, as agame master, is to pretendthat you are locking the door,but in reality, just leave thedoors unlocked. Participantswill play really hard just tofind that they could finishthe game any time theywanted just by pushingunlocked doors. It's a little bittricky and dangerous, butworth trying at least once.

      Current best-practice for safety in escape rooms is to never actually lock the exit doors. For this reason, I'd discourage using this "trick" in designs, because the doors shouldn't really be locked in the first place.

  8. Dec 2020
    1. In contrast, creative work requires attention to social and cultural context, the ability to make unexpected combinations, and a drive to focus on meaning rather than means. It is, in other words, a fundamentally human activity. The knowledge that informs innovative activity isn’t just the product of combinatorics; it’s defined by the creation of new insight out of diverse pieces of information. Creative knowledge is more like a verb than a noun: it is activity, not information; and it requires people—usually groups of people and often diverse groups—to bring it about. Using machines to take on the burden of processing tasks frees up time and energy for the human partner to provide insight and creative thinking that will in turn help the machines better predict and provide the information a user needs.

      well said!!

    Annotators

    1. Doesn’t this create such paralyzing uncertainty that nobody knows if they can do anything at all? Not really. Controversial cases are more likely to go to the full 49 judge panel. If an opinion is only held by 20% of judges in the country, then there’s only about a 1 in a million chance that the panel will rule in favor. Even if the opinion is held by 40%, it’s still only an 8% chance of winning. So just don’t do things that more than 40% of people think are bad, and you’ll be fine!

      Why is this the case?

    1. A fact is a fact. It's not copyrightable, to own truth. If somebody figures out the geographical location of this building, that's just a truth. Nobody owns that. And, really, it's to everybody's advantage to share that.

      Nobody owns facts

    1. It’s natural for new goals to come into our lives and to get excited about new opportunities—just like it’s natural for a rose bush to add new buds. If we can muster the courage to prune away a few of our goals, then we create the space we need for the remaining goals to fully blossom. Full growth and optimal living require pruning.

      This is Essentialism.

      I always think that I can do everything, but that is a lie. The truth is that i have to choose what I commit to at any given time.

      Without removing distractions, you will never make progress on the things that truly matter to you.

    1. According to these digit span results, high immigrant Asian IQ is not just the product of Northeast Asians, as the LV national IQ numbers might have implied. The IQ of Indian immigrants is also high, which suggests that the United States enjoys positive selection from that part of the world. The IQ of sub-Saharan Africans is similarly much higher than the LV data would predict, though it is still low by native standards

      so it's confounded by the bias of smarter people moving first and doesn't tell too much. not fine grained enough to tease apart indian iq

    1. It's enticing and exciting when that thing clicks in your head and you realise you found a way to solve the problem. Perhaps with a trivial problem that's cool and there's really nothing more to do. However, if the problem is non-trivial or important, it's worth considering that there may be other solutions you simply haven't thought of yet. To avoid getting carried away in the excitement of going from no solution to a solution, and simply going with the first thing that comes into your head, try to think of at least 1 more. Trying to find a second solution often forces you to think differently, and once you have two you'll be forced to consider the trade-offs in order to select one. Such contrasting trade-offs can often help frame the problem more clearly as well.

      .engineering

      This is perhaps useful at times, although sometimes you really just want to get the code out quicker. So I think it depends. If the project is long-term, this is a good idea.

    1. "Errors in the Constitution

      BACK TO THE USSR?

      The Second Coming BY WILLIAM BUTLER YEATS

      Turning and turning in the widening gyre<br> The falcon cannot hear the falconer; Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world, The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere<br> The ceremony of innocence is drowned; The best lack all conviction, while the worst<br> Are full of passionate intensity.

      Surely some revelation is at hand; Surely the Second Coming is at hand.<br> The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out<br> When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert<br> A shape with lion body and the head of a man,<br> A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,<br> Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it<br> Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.<br> The darkness drops again; but now I know<br> That twenty centuries of stony sleep Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,<br> And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,<br> Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

      n/a Source: The Collected Poems of W. B. Yeats (1989)

      What rough beast?

      Making the beast with two backs is a euphemistic metaphor for two persons engaged in sexual intercourse. It refers to the situation in which a couple—in the missionary position, woman on top, on their sides, kneeling, or standing—cling to each other as if a single creature, with their backs to the outside.

      In English, the expression dates back to at least William Shakespeare's Othello (Act 1, Scene 1, ll. 126-127, c. 1601–1603):[1]

      I am one, sir, that comes to tell you your daughter and the Moor are now making the beast with two backs.[2]

      The earliest known occurrence of the phrase is in Rabelais's Gargantua and Pantagruel (c. 1532) as the phrase la bête à deux dos. Thomas Urquhart translated Gargantua and Pantagruel into English, which was published posthumously around 1693.[3]

      In the vigour of his age he married Gargamelle, daughter to the King of the Parpaillons, a jolly pug, and well-mouthed wench. These two did oftentimes do the two-backed beast together, joyfully rubbing and frotting their bacon 'gainst one another.[4]


      With the storm outside and this fire's bright Oh, and in your eyes I see what's on my mind You've got me wild, turned around inside Oh, and this desire, see, is creeping up heavy inside here I know you feel the same way as I do now Let's make this an evening We'll share some wine, maybe we'll get high

      Oh, well, lay here with me Just for a night, just for this evening Oh, and we'll make our passionate pictures And maybe twist up a secret creature And away here And tomorrow go back to being friends

      Go back to being friends, tonight let's be lovers Say oh, tonight let's be lovers Oh, and I see this, oh, share glasses And our tongues twist and sweat sings So deep into the core, we'll call it's over Oh make our juice, I'll make, I'll do Oh, with me, lay, I'll do lay down and with you And we rogue kiss and we wrote this

      Oh, stay here with me Just for this night, just for an evening Oh, and together, oh, I don't know, well I think we choose well, come find this over And, we'll run away just for today Oh, then tomorrow it's back in life And we'll forget this as if a secret time were there And we'll wake up Oh, tomorrow go back to being friends

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sd_iMLsV5mE

    1. Culture is powerful precisely because it is so present and at the same time so very difficult to name or identify.

      Very interesting way to put it; Culture is powerful however it is made powerful by the ones who put themselves at the top in the first place, it's not that difficult to name or identify it's just blatant ignorance.

    1. There is likewise another great advantage in my scheme, that it will prevent those voluntary abortions, and that horrid practice of women murdering their bastard children, alas, too frequent among us, sacrif icing the poor innocent babes, I doubt,8 more to avoid the expense than the shame, which would move tears and pity in the most savage and inhuman breast.The number of souls in this kingdom being usually reckoned one million and a half, of these I calculate there may be about two hundred thousand couple whose wives are breeders; from which number I subtract thirty thousand couples who are able to maintain their own children, although I apprehend there cannot be so many under the present distresses of the kingdom; but this being granted, there will remain an hundred and seventy thousand breeders.
      1. Something I realized while reading this was how topical it was in terms of abortion laws. In the South, the government made the option of abortion illegal, which obviously rose ire from the crowd. It was basically the white men in charge saying that the choice was "monstrous", clearly not realizing how hard it is to be a young single mom or someone who believes that they can't take care of a child yet. I can't tell whether or not Swift was pro or anti abortion (due to the tone of the essay) but it's interesting nonetheless.

      2. The point of calling child-bearing women "breeders" was both funny and horrifying to me. But that's probably just because I have a very dark and weird sense of humor. It reminded me of a book called "The Handmaid's Tale" (if you haven't read it yet, do it ASAP), in which women are forced to do whatever a man wants them to do, including bearing a child.

      3. The term souls was an interesting one to use. I doubt it has any real significance to the author, but interestingly, the United Kingdom had more than a million and a half people, at that point in time. I think that it's possible when using "souls" in this sense, he meant the heart of that person. This would leave out a significant number of people, with that being the higher-ups in Britain. I'm probably just reading too much into it, but I thought it was interesting.

    1. welfare systems, often just as abruptly as at the border. Some parents struggle to support children without federal policies like paid family leave and subsidized child care that are offered in other countries.

      It's interesting how American values are often family-based, however, politically they focus less on average families.