Você e eu estamos na praia?
sim,nós estamos na praia
Você e eu estamos na praia?
sim,nós estamos na praia
A moça responde ao professor?
sim,ele está responde ao professor
O presidente está perto da janela?
Ele está perto jannela
we also build ChatUniTest Mod-els[13 ], which provides fine-tuned models for Java test generationtasks based on Code Llama
这里提到他们微调了模型,但到底效果如何缺没见到说明
I never saw my mother, to know her as such, more than four or five times in my life; and each of these times was very short in duration, and at night.
Douglass never knew his mom on a personal level and she died when he was seven years old.
never having seen any authentic record containing it. By far the larger part of the slaves know as little of their ages as horses know of theirs,
Definitely was intentional because African-American lives weren't that important to city officials. There was no point in keeping record of slaves as they were considered as property or cattle.
When and how to use Standard English Maybe you have cousins or friends in other parts of the country, and there have been times when you have misunderstood each other? Perhaps you were trying to play a game that has different names in different parts of the country. Such local words, which are not Standard English, should not be used in formal situations such as in an exam or going for a job interview. In formal situations, it is required that you use Standard English, which also means not using slang words that you would use with your friends.
friend talk a multi standard English cause its different in other parts or country.
For some people, it is not difficult to use Standard English, because it happens to be their local dialect. But for others in different parts of the country, they may have to remind themselves to follow the rules, including the sentence order and grammar of Standard English, when they are speaking or writing in a formal context. However, Standard English can be spoken in any accent, and must not be confused with talking ‘posh’.
when people talk in standard English need to used the rules like grammar and sentence cause this used in formal English.
An important influence then came from the Normans who invaded England with William the Conqueror in 1066. The Normans settled here permanently, bringing with them the French language and Latin. Old English was still spoken by most of the ordinary people, while French and Latin became the languages of the ruling classes, and was used for legal and religious duties.
how in the past other languages uses primary than English.
Standard English today Although language changes all the time – think of new words like Internet, Web site, and so on – we still use Standard English as the formal form of our language. Standard English is the form that is taught in schools, following set rules of grammar and spelling. Newspapers are written in Standard English and it is used by newsreaders on national television, who need to be understood by people with different local dialects, all over the country.
people talk standard English with rules teach in the school.
This standardization spread across Britain, replacing all other dialect forms, that is, the other local styles of English spoken around the country. Latin and French were no longer used in law or academic work, which culminated in the 18th century, when dictionaries and grammar books were first written. Dr Johnson wrote an influential dictionary in 1755, which fixed many of the spellings we still use today.
latin and french dont used anymore?
Middle English developed at a crucial time in history, forcing the English language into some stability. One of the main reasons for this was that language started to be written down, and in 1458, the German Johannes Gutenberg invented printing, a process that William Caxton introduced to England in 1475. With all the differences and varieties in the language, Caxton had to make some choices about printing, which served to stabilize and standardize English to a certain extent. Because of where Caxton lived, he chose the east Midlands dialect, the language form used in London and around the southeast. The fixed spellings of what came to be known as Standard English, had been born, and were now, literally, set down in black and white.
how standardized the English form?
The next 300 years acted like a big melting pot, in which all these languages and different influences were mixed, until the language that gradually emerged was Middle English.
different language gradually emerged was English?
Standard English The history of English is quite a story in itself, with dramatic changes and great variety. Up to about 450, British (Celtic) tribes spoke languages related to modern Welsh, Scots Gaelic, and Irish (Erse). However, the years between 450 and 1066 brought about great change. The Angles, Saxons, and Jutes invaded from North Germany in around 450, and settled on the eastern side of what is now called England. Their language, Anglo-Saxon, spread across to the west of England and developed into what we now call Old English. Many of the words we use today still relate back to Old English – but this was soon to change too. Other invasions, this time in the form of the Vikings from Scandinavia, influenced the language with new words from the Viking's language Old Norse that entered Old English between 800 and 900.
history about how the English changes in different countries
Do you speak more than one language? Perhaps you are taught French or German at school, or English is your second language, and you speak a different tongue at home. But have you ever thought that you also speak different forms of language? For example, you probably speak to your friends in a way that you would never speak to, say, an interviewer in an interview. Hopefully, you would write differently in an exam than you would in a text message or e-mail! When we communicate with different people and in different situations, we naturally follow different sets of rules and patterns, often without having to think about the switches and transitions we are making. The most used form of English is Standard English.
manners to talk in English and different forms that you speak in public or home.
The equator cuts the continent in half, and the rainforest is along the equator. Tropical climates occur around the equator because this area receives direct or relatively direct insolation (incoming solar radiation) for the entire year (Figure 4.4b&4.4c).
Geography is way more complicated than I thought! Africa has such a variety of climates—not just deserts but rainforests, savannas, and even snow-capped mountains like Kilimanjaro. Climate, wind patterns, and ocean currents all affect how people live and farm. It’s really cool how people adapt to these conditions with so much traditional knowledge.
Some of us might see a downtrodden, impoverished woman forced simultaneously to care for her child and to farm with simple tools. Others might interpret the tree-filled field in the background as a sign of backwardness, of potential farmland unused, or the fallen wood behind her as evidence of deforestation.
This makes me rethink how I’ve been taught to view Africa. I realize now that stereotypes can hide the skill, knowledge, and resilience of the people who live there.
In Africa South of the Sahara, women produce roughly 70 percent of the food. The woman photographed here is farming peanuts that she will use in her family's meals or sell at the market. Why the simple farming implement? She uses a short-handled hoe because these are heavy clay soils, making long-handled hoes less effective. A motorized plow would destroy the soils in this area after only a few years of use.
Wow, I had no idea women were doing so much of the food production! It’s really impressive how much responsibility falls on women like the mother in Mali, balancing childcare and farming. It makes me think about gender roles back home and how women’s work is often undervalued.
San had more time for leisure, slept more, ate a more balanced diet, and worked less than their “more developed” farming neighbors. The San and other hunter-gatherers around the world know where they can find different resources, including food, shelter, and water, during the course of the year, and they migrate seasonally and purposely to find resources necessary for survival
It’s honestly so eye-opening to see that the San work way fewer hours but still have everything they need, while people in “developed” countries are constantly stressed and overworked. It really makes me think that modern life isn’t necessarily better — it’s just different.
The San people of the Kalahari Desert in southern Africa are one remaining such group. What thoughts come to mind when you see a picture of hunter-gatherers? Most Westerners see such groups as primitive, backward, or underdeveloped. We may think of hunter-gatherers as “less developed” than city dwellers in New York or London. Whether we are conscious of it or not, we likely place people on a continuum of development, a scale typically linked to indicators of material well-being. What criteria do we use to measure development in our mind, and why do we use these criteria? Development implies progress, but progress in what? Does development mean amassing wealth? Does development mean access to clean water and a steady food supply? Can people be poor and developed at the same time? While we may perceive hunter-gatherers as primitive or underdeveloped, hunter-gatherers necessarily worse off than we are? Studies suggest that one group of San spent 12 to 19 hours per week working to obtain food as compared to the 40-some-hour workweek of most people in the so-called developed world.
The discussion about the San people really challenges the idea of them being “underdeveloped.” Honestly, I feel like they actually use their time really well and live in a sustainable way that works for them. In some ways, that makes them more economically balanced than people might assume when they call them “underdeveloped.”
.
.
.
important
im really fw with G and C
.
this would have confused me if i were in the situation because the sentence C said doesnt make any sense to me. but the teacher doesnt bat an eye, they just repeat what C said to M. because it isnt necessary for the reasoning to align with the teacher's logic, nor does the teacher need to know the whole contextual backstory. because if the teacher did, then that could put them in. situation in which they have to ask themselves what THEY think the right solution is, and that's not the idea at all!!!, only M needs to understand C.
YES because theyre the ones playing the game and they have the real stake in the matter FUCKKKKKKKK
SOMETIMES CHILDREN ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT THE SAME ISSUE!
JHDJKHKSDJKFHS True....
every resolution ends on a positive note from the teacher. positive reinforcement
REASONING
YEAH THATS WHAT I SAID
ooooooo so the teacher is just fully adhering to what the child says first. if K says "he can write his letters" then that's that... UNLESS R can express a take of their own. The children are fully in the arena here, and using words to communicate is not only encouraged by the teacher explicitly, but implicitly in the very environment that they have created.
difficulty speaking is helped, of course. R seems quieter than K by a long shot, but the teacher is mediating the whole time, and that means assisting R in his communication.
so many things here
soooo important!!!!
.
they dont know 0???
fuuuuckkkk
.
.
Symbolic knowledge structures
For eg Amazon Guardrails, Essentially Symbolic or logical can act as guardrail to check the resposes from llm ( essentially constraint it)
Neurosymbolic AI refers to AI systems that seek to integrateneural network-based methods with symbolic knowledge-based approaches
Gives you best of both the world's
Heuristic evaluation55 Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing (CHI). is a collection of user interface design principles that, when applied systematically to a user interface, can identify many of the same breakdowns that a user test would identify. We’ll discuss this method here.
I find Nielsen and Molich’s concept of heuristic evaluation really useful because it provides a structured, expert-driven way to catch usability issues early without needing full user testing. I agree with the reading that this method can often reveal similar breakdowns as user tests, which makes it both efficient and cost-effective. However, I also think it’s important to remember that heuristic evaluation relies on the evaluator’s experience—so while it limits some kinds of bias, it can’t fully replace real user feedback, which captures the emotional and contextual aspects of interaction.
Design has a long way to go before its methods are truly equitable, focusing on the edge cases and margins of human experience and diversity, rather than on the dominant cases. It’s your responsibility as a designer to look for those methods and demand their use.
I agree with the point that many design methods miss real people at the edges. We often chase speed and easy learning and ignore access, culture, and fairness. The reminder to use diverse personas and equity focused checks is practical and helpful. It makes me want to pair walkthroughs with sessions that center people who are usually left out. I will not call a design finished until those cases are tested and included.
Will the user try to achieve the right effect? In other words, would the user even know that this is the goal they should have? If not, there’s a design flaw.
I think this is actually a lot of questions that designers miss out. A lot of the times, I find myself using a device or an interface without really sharing the same "goal" with the designer. I had moments where an update of interface created a major inconvenience to me as I personally favored the previous interface better. Or, even sometimes I am not aware of all the design features and end up only utilizing 10% of of the entire program.
Will the user try to achieve the right effect? In other words, would the user even know that this is the goal they should have? If not, there’s a design flaw.Will the user notice that the correct action is available? If they wouldn’t notice, you have a design flaw.Will the user associate the correct action with the effect that the user is trying to achieve? Even if they notice that the action is available, they may not know it has the effect they want. If the correct action is performed, will the user see that progress is being made toward the solution of the task? In other words, is there feedback that confirms the desired effect has occurred? If not, they won’t know they’ve made progress. This is a design flaw.
These steps are helpful to keep in mind when conducting a cognitive walkthrough because it can act as a 'toolkit' when I'm unsure of what I need to be measuring. Having parameters when doing tests is also helpful for a beginner like me, who has only done one or two in the past. It's interesting to think about how these steps address whether the design is intuitive enough from different angles.
The fundamental idea of a walkthrough is to think as the user would, evaluating every step of a task in an interface for usability problems. One of the more common walkthrough methods is a Cognitive Walkthrough77 Polson, P. G., Lewis, C., Rieman, J., & Wharton, C. (1992). Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. . Despite having been published in the early nineties, the technique is quite general, since it focuses on what people are thinking while using an interface rather than the interface.
I totally agree with this quote. I like that cognitive walkthroughs focus on what people are actually thinking as they move through an interface, instead of just how the interface looks. It shows that even older methods can still be super relevant, since understanding the user’s mindset never really goes out of style.
Walkthroughs77 Polson, P. G., Lewis, C., Rieman, J., & Wharton, C. (1992). Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. are methods where an expert (that would be you, novice designer), defines tasks, but rather than testing those tasks with real people, you walk through each step of the task and verify that a user would know to do the step, know how to do the step, would successfully do the step, and would understand the feedback the design provided. If you go through every step and check these four things, you’ll find all kinds of problems with a design.
This step is key to designing a good workflow. In my prior work as a product designer. It helped me realize one of the biggest flaws in my design process, which is that I jump into prototyping or working on some form of visual elements before I thoroughly think through the workflow itself. This often results in big gaps in the workflow due to the design being based off of my experience and understanding.
For example, one of the workflows I've designed was a feature to help users with cognitive disabilities to identify a position of interest (e.g. cashier), but one of the input source I used to determine the result was industry of interest, which doesn't make much sense of it now that I look back, since you can't expect most job seekers with cognitive disabilities to know whether they like to work in retail or hospitality, etc.
Observation, of course, requires empirical methods. These contrast to critical methods in that they remove expert judgement from evaluation, leaving only observable phenomena in how someone interacts with a design. This has the benefit of limiting subjectivity, which can, in some circumstances, be quite wrong in its interpretations and predictions.
I agree that observation, as an empirical method, is valuable because it helps remove personal bias and ensures that findings are grounded in what users actually do, not just what experts think they will do. I find this especially useful in design research, where assumptions about user behavior can easily lead to misleading conclusions. However, I also think that relying solely on observation can sometimes miss the why behind users’ actions—something that critical or interpretive methods can better capture. This reading helped me realize that a balance between empirical and critical approaches can provide both objectivity and depth in understanding user experiences.
The ease with which A/B tests can run, and the difficulty of measuring meaningful things, can lead designers to overlook the importance of meaningful things.
I strongly agree with this point. In practice, teams gravitate toward the KPIs that are cheapest to measure, such as clicks, sign-ups, short-term retention, while tougher outcomes like equity, safety, or long-term well-being get sidelined. The article is useful because it reframes evaluation as a toolbox: usability tests for breakdowns, probes/experience sampling for real-life fit, and A/B tests for causal impact. It changes my perspective to plan mixed-method evaluations upfront, so that what’s measurable doesn’t quietly replace what actually matters.
First, you need to decide who is representative of the stakeholders you are designing for and then find several people to invite to participate. Who is representative depends entirely on whose problem you think you’re solving and partly on your ability to get access to people that have that problem.
I totally agree on how important it is to recognize the main stakeholder and their needs/goals in their problem. However, my question is what if there is multiple? There could always be multiple representatives of stakeholder holding same importance value. Then, in that case would we consider both even though that causes higher chance of risking breakdowns and financial support?
but they generally can’t help you learn about whether the design achieves its larger goals (whether it’s useful, valuable, meaningful, etc.). This is because a usability test doesn’t occur in the context of someone’s actual life, where those larger goals are relevant.
When testing a design, I thinks it natural to want to test all of the capabilities and limitations in one go. So, having this framework when approaching user tests is helpful because it prevents both the observer and user from becoming overwhelmed with the all goals the testing wants to achieve. Additionally, it'll help me be realistic when I conduct user testing, as I won't be able to get the all results I'm looking for in one session; rather, results would be collection over time in other sessions.
Usability tests can help you learn about lower level problems in a user interface (layout, labeling, flow, etc.), but they generally can’t help you learn about whether the design achieves its larger goals (whether it’s useful, valuable, meaningful, etc.). This is because a usability test doesn’t occur in the context of someone’s actual life, where those larger goals are relevant.
Yeah, I totally agree with this quote as usability tests are awesome for catching stuff like confusing buttons, weird layouts, or a clunky flow. But they don’t really show if the design actually fits into someone’s real life or if it’s genuinely useful. It made me realize that even if something tests well in a lab, it might still fail to be meaningful in the real world. I think it’s a good reminder that good design is about more than just making things easy to use and it’s about making them worth using.
We’re here to test this system, not you, so anything that goes wrong is our fault, not yours.
This is one of the most common problems I've encountered during my time working on projects. I've found that people are very self-conscious during usability tests. One thing that worked for me is to remind users multiple times during the session (e.g. embedding a reminder text into the software we're testing or verbally reminding the users of this)
In this respect, the deployment of AI technologies certainly implies the emergence of new professions, which must be properly understood. For example, new technical professions such as health data analysts, experts in knowledge translation, quality engineers in ehealth, and telemedicine coordinators, as well as professionals in social and human sciences such as ethicists of algorithms and robots are to be imagined [141, 142]. The construction of the organization’s ethical culture will depend in particular on its ability to identify areas of ethical risk, deploy its ethical values, and engage all its members in its mission [143].
While AI is ruining the workplace, it is also creating new opportunities for employment. Whenever AI introduces a problem, a solution is needed. However, it’s easy to assume these new jobs could be done by anyone. In reality, AI can access a huge amount of info, while humans need to develop the necessary skills to perform these tasks. Therefore, society might struggle for a time to adapt.
However, if these kinds of tasks become more widespread, might AI endanger jobs or even replace health professionals, as is often feared in technological transitions [130]?
While AI is definitely making it harder to work, I doubt it would be able to replace healthcare. Who would feel safe going to a machine that has no degree just a mixture of true knowledge, and made-up ideas on the internet? People would much rather go to someone who can understand them. and who truly know what they're doing.
Healthcare systems, professionals, and administrators will all be impacted by the implantation of AI systems. The first impact consists in the transformation of tasks. The integration of AI is transforming professional tasks, creating new forms of work [131], and forcing a readjustment of jobs (e.g., changing roles and tasks, modifying professional identities, evolving of professional accountability). For the WHO, readjusting to workplace disruption appears to be a necessary consequence of the ethical principle of “sustainability” identified by the committee of experts on the deployment of AI. In particular, governments and companies should consider “potential job losses due to the use of automated systems for routine healthcare functions and administrative tasks” [27]. Image recognition, for example, makes radiology one of the most advanced specialties in AI system integration [132]. AI is now able to “automate part of conventional radiology” [133], reducing the diagnostic tasks usually assigned to the radiologist. The authors of the French strategy report believe that this profession could then “evolve towards increased specialization in interventional radiology for diagnostic purposes (punctures, biopsies, etc.) for complex cases or therapeutic purposes guided by medical imaging” [133]. The practice of electrocardiograms in cardiology [133] or that of dentists in their routine and laborious tasks [134] is already undergoing upheaval. The field of general medicine is also being impacted by applications available to the public, such as “medical assistant” chatbots that can analyze users’ symptoms and direct them to a specialist or pharmacist. In the case of minor ailments, such technologies de facto diminish the role of the general practitioner.
AI is damaging healthcare and rearranging how the career looks. WHO says this adjustment is part of keeping healthcare “sustainable,” but mentions that it could also lead to unemployment. Radiology is one of the most affected areas because it isn't as hands-on as most healthcare careers.
computational
Computational: Using or relating to computers.
impediments
Impediment: A hindrance or obstruction in doing something.
jurisdictions
Jurisdictions: The official power to make legal decisions/judgements.
In the medical context, increasing importance is placed on patients’ co-participation in their care [54] and their ability to refuse care or request additional medical advice
How could relying on AI change the way doctors and patients make decisions together?
Considering the intimacy and sensitivity of health data and the many actors potentially involved, AI highlights the question of individual privacy.
if AI makes a mistake, who should be held accountable? Should the hospital take the blame?
malign
evil in nature or effect.
hese policies included its insistence thatIndians plant commercial crops such as indigo, jute, and opium poppies inplace of rice and other food crops; its monopoly on trade; its seizure of landfrom hereditary landowners; and its extraction from the Indians of high taxes
Its quite telling that despite this appearance to care about what the BEIC was doing, the British government was happy to reap the fruits of their labor and take over India in 1857
the Commander-in-Chief of BritishIndia from 1756-1760, and Governor and Commander-in-Chief from 1764-1767
That's a very high and powerful position
Open notebook science is a gathering movement across a number of fields to make the entire research process transparent by sharing materials online as they are generated.
The idea of transparency aligns with my goal of including a digital dataset without over-claiming, adding onto a previous annotation I made, I believe I should continue with the idea of creating a secondary journal to log my processes and potential failures.
however
comma here
steps
comma here
Finally, the assumptions of utilizing a multiple linear regression model may have limited the study data and conclusions that can be drawn from modeling as a linear model assumes a clear cut relationship between a predictor and the outcome.
This sentence is a bit confusing. Consider rewording (e.g., "Finally, the assumptions inherent in a multiple linear regression model may have constrained the data and the conclusions, given that linear models presume a clear, linear relationship between predictors and the outcome variable.")
questions
comma here
distrust
comma here
0.28
comma here
Similarly
comma here
safety
comma here
For instance difference ,as a predictor of feelings of distrust and lack of safety in one’s community being a person of color was only associated with a 0.13 point increase in scores while being nonsignificant with a p value of 0.6.
This sentence is a bit confusing. Consider rewording (e.g., "For instance, being a person of color was associated with only a 0.13-point increase in reported distrust and lack of safety, a difference that was not statistically significant (p = 0.6).")
Similarly,
I really like the way you break up the blocks of writing by listing them with their corresponding code chunks. This is definitely something I want to include in my report as I revise for my final submission!
significant
comma here
,
consider making this part after the comma a new sentence
well
comma here
average
comma here
safety
comma here
,
consider making this part after the comma a new sentence
safety
comma here
Figure 2.4
comma here
women
comma here
6/10)
comma here
Overall
comma here
or possibly even a slight negative relationship as social status increases, feelings of safety decrease.
This end of the sentence here gets a bit confusing. Consider rewording (e.g., "Alternatively, for females, increases in social status appear to be largely unrelated to feelings of safety, with a potential slight negative trend in which greater social status corresponds to lower perceived safety.")
Alternatively
comma here
males
comma here
females
comma here
safety
comma here
,
could make this an em dash if wanted!
dataset
comma here
variable
comma here
status
comma here
variables
comma here
,
could replace this comma with "and" if wanted!
overlap
comma here
However, plots visualizing social status in relation to community and non community variables revealed more variation
I would consider rewording this topic sentence to help the flow out a bit. For example, you could say, "Unlike the largely flat patterns observed for political beliefs, social status demonstrated more distinct variation in perceived community trust and safety across genders."
#|fig-alt:
I wasn't sure how to do this in my own report, so now seeing this code and how you approached it is super helpful to inspire revisions for my final report!
#explanation:
These explanations are super helpful for the reader due to their depth (something I will definitely place more emphasis on in my revisions now that I realize their significance)!
Comparto la idea del autor ya que siempre tenemos que tener motivación para hacer un trabajo de investigación ya que así se fomenta la curiosidad y sobre todo el compromiso ya que será un tema que al alumno le agrade y lo realice por cuenta propia
Es de suma importancia tener una visión o propósito antes de entrar a la investigación ya que permite tener claridad, facilidad de interpretación o evitar errores.
Para poder hacer una investigación debe haber un tema o más que esto tiene que haber una finalidad ya sea una necesidad o un problema práctico, ya que esto servirá de guía en el proceso.
Se explica que el proceso de investigación no es lineal, sino espiralado, lo que significa que el investigador avanza, reflexiona y retrocede constantemente para mejorar su comprensión y reformular sus estrategias conforme surgen nuevos hallazgos.
Se menciona que uno de los mayores retos para los estudiantes es distinguir entre el conocimiento del sentido común y el conocimiento científico, lo que les dificulta comprender cómo construir un trabajo de investigación con bases teóricas y metodológicas.
El texto resalta que la investigación debe realizarse como un proceso planificado, sistemático y riguroso, cuyo propósito es generar conocimiento confiable que contribuya a comprender la investigación.
Merely making material available online - however well intentioned - is not sufficient to democratize learning or to give actual access.
Adding onto this quote and relating it to my project if I share my results on a small webpage, accessibility matters (headings) so those who do not specialize in my specific topic can understand my evidence about incubation, substances and cures.
The Museum has restored ownership of both works to the artist’s known descendants, returning one to the family and purchasing the other back.
So they restored ownership by returning one of the pieces and selling the other? Is there any info on how much they had to pay?
Excel is a black box. When we use it, we have to take on faith that its statistics do what they say they are doing
If I do my dataset only in a spreadsheet, it doesn't show or record the steps I made to create my "incubation + Inscription + cure" accounts. I think it's necessary to keep a secondary journal to log the processes I took.
These may be characterised as 'cognitive artefacts': human-made physical objects that we employ as a means of assisting us in performing a cognitive task, and which are able to represent, store, retrieve, and manipulate information
The dataset i'm created is itself a "cognitive artefact". It represents the Iamata in a particular way, that means that I must show how I moved from inscription text to tags, so that readers can evaluate my choices, meaning that I should add a little "from text to tag" example for one inscription to demonstrate my tagging logic.
Such cognitive artefacts may operate in different ways and using different functions such that they complement human cognition – in effect they extend what the human mind can do, rather than replicate it.
Scripts can quickly promote patterns like in my case "sleep-vision + wine/ointment," but historical judgement still decides if a line really describes a medicinal step made or just a metaphor.
Similarly, the pages of the annual Computer Applications in Archaeology conference proceedings are filled with accounts of applications and case studies of their use, but examples of failure are rare, not least because the incentives for authors and publishers to report successes are naturally greater.
Publishing only wins hides where tagging or counts break, this quote signals to me that I also have to show cases that failed to build trust to the conclusions I make. I will have to add a tiny "case failure" box/paragraph if for example, inscriptions where incubation is present but no drug is.)
Of course, while the process of measurement may be objective, its value and effectiveness relies on appropriate use and application which often remains dependent on the human component.
A perfect frequency count of "poppy + wine" can still mislead if my definitions are off or translations vary, meaning that in regards to the quote interpretation still remains human. This means for my assignment I'll have to include a "limitations" paragraph that pulls together translations choices or overlapping rituals vs medicinal language.
As survey instrumentation becomes digital and increasingly automated, so the level of human engagement changes: the cognitive load is transferred to the digital device while the survey strategy and (for now) the physical assembly and setup of the instrumentation remains on the human side of the relationship.
Sometimes point and click spreadsheets can feel effortless, but they sometimes hide certain steps. This means for the dataset for my project I need to keep it relatively short and keep readable notes so that it's easy to follow how the linkages work between Incubation, substances, and cures at the Sanctuary of Asklepius at Epidaurus
Act
法案
Presbyterian
長老會
succession
繼承性
surviving
倖存下來
successor
接班人
Treaty
條約
persecuted
受迫害
govern
治理
constituencies
選區
constitutional monarchy
君主立憲制
Within the past thirty years, the narrative established by sympathetic colonial administrators, pioneer African American scholars, nationalist African historians, and the standard explanations of state formation here and elsewhere have been challenged. Recent archaeological research, com-bined with that of historians, art historians, and anthropologists, necessi-tates the rethinking of these established narratives. Excavations in Jenne-Jeno (old Jenne in the modern nation of Mali) have opened an entirely new paradigm of the origins of complex urban-centered societies in Africa (and by extension elsewhere in the world). The emergence of towns in the west-ern and probably central Sudan occurred far earlier than indicated by Arab chronicles and oral traditions.
I find interesting that even though Africa had such advanced urban societies, many historian still have a poor understanding of this.
These scholars sought to “decolonize” the African past by demonstrating that, far from being the “primitive” realm of European imperialists’ mythologies, Africa had a long and noble tradition of statebuilding like other areas of the world.
I think it's great that scholars undo the many stereotypes that perpetuate poor understanding of Africa and it's people because that is how progress is made in our current society.
Until recently, scholars attributed state formation in the savannas of West Africa to the introduction of the camel into the western Sahara sometime after 1700 BCE.
It's interesting how historical understanding can shift so greatly with new information presented to the historical record.
The largest and best known of these is the trans-Saharan trade network, which “extended throughout the Sahara Desert, an expanse of 3,320,000 square miles” (Schraeder 2004a:36). “If you traveled across the United States from Boston to San Diego, you still would not have crossed the Sahara
People in the west tend to have a skewed view of just how big Africa is and don't understand the entire scale of it.
deter-minist views that Africans were incapable of organizing stable “civiliza-tions” or states without external leadership. The once commonly accepted premise that the first states in Africa were the result of common patterns of “divine kingship,” diffused from Egypt or elsewhere, have been gradually abandoned by most knowledgeable scholars of African history. The equally misguided view that civilization originated in sub-Saharan Africa is also unacceptable to most scholars.
Scholars have become more accepting of African tribes abilities throughout history to form, organized societies, and leadership
The Igbo are neighbors of the highly politically centralized Yoruba, but their political system is much dif-ferent. Instead of centralized kingdoms headed by powerful “kings” and their advisers, the Igbo had no centralized system of governance. Rather they lived in politically autonomous villages. That is, each village was politically separate and was politically not directly connected to neighbor-ing villages. Within the villages, there was not a system of hereditary chiefs. Village decisions were made by a headman and a council of elders that selected the headman. The absence of a centralized system of govern-ment did not mean that there were no systems or institutions of governance among the Igb
I find interesting that society was able to thrive, despite having a centralized government since I've been raised on such strong encouragement of the federal government.
crop-raising revolution was a great step forward for humankind. Clearly, it is only with the invention of crop cultivation that the human species could create the elaborate social and cultural patterns with which most people today would be familiar. Furthermore, it is in advanced hoe-farming and agricultural societies (those using animal traction) that the separation between rulers and ruled, inequality between men and women, and the institution of slavery evolved.
Farming itself isn't the main reason agriculture furthered African societies. It was also the technologies and techniques they advanced.
Major fishing communities in Africa most likely predate the development of techniques for growing food crops and taming animals. Many settle-men
I found it interesting that fishing is such an ancient practice in places, such as Africa given that agriculture has been so prevalent for so many years..
As in most gathering and hunting societies, women’s economic functions, along with childbearing, are absolutely crucial. Women typically generate more food through gath-ering than the men who hunt animals or look for game that has already been killed. Gathering and hunting societies appear to have developed d
Women were very important to early Africa, which is the trend of many different tribes and societies around the world. Women have played a huge role in history and continue to do so
The role of the
Can you guys see my comment?
Many experts now include knowledge as a fifth factor, acknowledging its key role in business success.
This section demonstrates how much the world has changed, which is why I find it so fascinating. Success used to mostly depend on material possessions like land or machinery, but these days it's more about people's knowledge, ideas, and technological prowess.
We can involve students in the process of curating content for courses, either by offering them limited choices between different texts or by offering them solid time to curate a future unit more or less on their own (or in a group) as a research project
Absolutely true, students learn by doing, so as they are involved in creating course content, they develop course development skills, which will enable develop a course from scratch in the future.
I believe most teachers are skeptical about letting undergraduate students be involved in course content creation or modification, but tend to let graduate students undertake these assignments.
Digital archaeology resists the (digital) neo-colonialism of Google, Facebook, and similar tech giants that typically promote disciplinary silos and closed code and data repositories.
This quote highlights the important ethical dimension of digital archaeology. Showing how open access and collaborative tools in digital archaeology challenge corporate control over knowledge. It aligns with using open GIS platforms that I will use for my projects and open data policy.
Digital archaeology should exist to assist us in the performance of archaeology as a whole. It should not be a secret knowledge, nor a distinct school of thought, but rather simply seen as archaeology done well, using all of the tools available to and in better recovering, understanding and presenting the past.
This expresses the idea that digital tools should be acting as extensions of thought rather than replacements. It connects to my final project because GIS and digital mapping help interpret archaeological data more effectively without detaching from human analysis.
f string
not explained before
a new class
a new instance of the Emperor class / an Emperor object
viola
voilà
After the class name, we have ().
cut
with
will
orrelation-in-r/, https://www.onlinespss.com/pearson-correlation-in-r/ #correlation_SS_vs_SH_T2 cor.t
possibly add more flow in calculating correlations section by breaking each cor.test up by variable
# Print and save to the plots folder print(SH_19_T1_vs_SS) `geom_smooth()` using formula = 'y ~ x'
what is happening with the cluster of data around 0 in Figure 5 below - may be important to change the scale or discuss this common response in the results
This plot shows the distribution of SH_11, SH_14, and SH_19,
spot where having the variable be more specific to the statement may be easier for the reader to follow
Reliability Statistics for Activating, Nonsleep, And Environment SH Items
shorter section titles here may help bring more flow to the report: ex reliability stats or reliability testing as a title for this section: then if you wanted to add more specificity you could have the sub headings be nonsleep, envi, etc
pping = aes( x = SH_T1, y = SLEEPSCORE)) + geom_point(position = "jitter")
any best fit line or residuals that could be plotted along with these two variables to make the correlation or lack of correlation more apparent may be helpful along with a fig caption and clear title
.7 Visualize 1.7.1 SH T1
muiltiple visualize sections with various length titles: consider making subheadings and keeping the larger headings shorter: also possible renaming of the SH variables to be more recognizable with a specific measure -- ex from variable in a later section SH_11 consider changing to SH_WORRY (referencing statement about worry before sleep--- association is easier for the viewer than the SH_#)
umber of categories should be increased in order to
is this a title for the next section or a note--- breaks up the flow of the page a bit: consider making into a comment in the code chunk
source: https://fripublichealth.quarto.pub/zerosum/report-preview.html#introduction, r manual combined <- combined %>% filter(!is.na(SH_10_T2)) %>% mutate(
looks like numerical values are being assigned to the variables here- for clarity add explanation of chunks and maybe a label on each that differentiates each SH variable: helps organize for reader
carty.github.io/FRIplaybook/composite.html scoreItems(keys = SH_T2_keys, items = combined) Call: scoreItems(keys = SH_T2_keys, items = combined) (Unstandardized) Alpha: SLEEPHYGIENE_T2 alpha 0.7 Standard errors of unstandardized Alpha: SLEEPHYGIENE_T2
is this section the same composite scoring or something else-- add explanation or maybe sub heading for clarity-- the alpha and standard error values make me think this is some type of modeling but source labeled as more composite scoring?
wide_17data %>% left_join( wide_dailydata_clean %>% select("PASSWORD", "SLEEPSCORE_T1",
purpose of joining the datasets-- what is the purpose/explanation for this section of code
<- day17data %>% pivot_wider( id_cols = PASSWORD, names_from = SURVEYDAY, values_from =
potentially add explanation note to indicate the purpose of converting long to wide format for the survey data
indicate areas for improvement in future studies that may lead to different results.
possible area to add specificity: ie could future research focus on alternative measures of sleep hygiene or alternatives to self reporting. may also be a perfect spot to connect back to purpose-- promoting wellbeing through sleep or preventing harm of mental illbeing using sleep
Not for nothing were chemists known as ‘spagyrists’ or workers by fire, or placed in the same category as smiths and farriers.
not for nothingは副詞句で倒置が起こってる。chemistは主語
If Boyle’s support for a mechanical philosophy that resolved matter and its sensory qualities into shaped particles in motion seems like later physical chemistry that was not the way other practising chemists saw it.
that前にカンマを追加。
that
,
To them Boyle had thrown out the baby with the bath water.
delicious
みごとな
that into which
what
concerning
〜に関して
for
というのも〜からだ
Culture refers to many characteristics of a group of people, including attitudes, behaviors, customs, religious beliefs, and values that are transmitted from one generation to the next
Culture means how people live, what they believe, and what they do. These things are passed from parents to children.
of Ms. Rosa Peveryday pedagogidismantle t
Conclusive final statements that reiterate how code meshing is a tool for overcoming racism as well as a bridge between different Englishes and racial communities within America.
e. Check out the following sho
more homework
We all code mesh.
Painting code meshing as accessible, something that unites, something that is innately inclusive.
Here is an abridgedin re
Giving readers the opportunity to do their homework.
ation but must adialects, b
A call to action. This entire essay is proactive in stance, serving to not only educate readers, but inspire them to find a way to incite change. Later on, this call to action is supported by a list of reading material that readers can utilize to educate themselves further on the subject matter.
ey straight trippin.
Using AAE to effectively drive the point home.
n uncritical habit of mind that justifies ineq-uity ... by accepting the existing order of things as given ... a form ofracism that tacitly accepts dominant White norms and privileges." (135)
What King is speaking of is an insidious complacency.
is what it is'" (PAG
Hodge's "It is what it is" and Mrs. Parks' "It ain't what it is" become the two opposing points of discussion for this essay. "It is what it is" demonstrates an apathy for racial suffering, while Parks' statement becomes a beacon of hope that readers, educators, and all citizens of the United States will take a more active stance towards fighting oppression.
because of her work with the NA
NAACP: National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. Rosa Parks worked as a NAACP secretary for serving as the secretary of the Montgomery chapter for 12 years, so at the point of the bus seat incident, she was already a seasoned activist.
“America’s refugee program was built to reflect our values, and the thousands of individuals we’ve closed our doors to represent thousands of missed opportunities of people who could have strengthened a local community or economy.”
For someone following migration and work trends in southern Africa, this policy shapes not only the direct US - Africa relations, it also affects regional attitudes about fairness and opportunity when talking about race.
“Do you support having a refugee admissions policy in this country that only admits white refugees?” Mr. Murphy
The congressional questioning shows growing concern about explicit racial bias in federal policy
“This decision doesn’t just lower the refugee admissions ceiling. It lowers our moral standing,” said Krish O’Mara Vignarajah
Critics frame the move as a moral failure that betrays the humanitarian spirit of the refugee program
The Trump administration, however, made the refugee determination official on Thursday, without consulting with the required congressional committees,
Issuing the policy without Congress shows disregard for legal process and oversight
Police statistics do not show that white people are more vulnerable to violent crime than other people in South Africa.
Data contradict Trump’s justification for protecting Afrikaners, undermining the policy’s stated rationale
He then created a carve-out for South African descendants of Dutch and French settlers who arrived there in the 17th century, even as families hoping to escape war in Sudan, Iranian religious minorities previously approved to travel to the United States and people in refugee camps around the world remained in limbo.
The carve-out for white South Africans shows how ideology and political symbolism now shape refugee priorities
The administration lowered the ceiling of refugee admissions to just 7,500 for the fiscal year that started this month, down from the cap of 125,000
The reduction shows a retreat from our traditional refugee commitments
The Trump administration is drastically cutting the number of refugees it will admit to the United States, rejecting thousands of people fleeing war and persecution while reserving the record-low number of slots for mostly white Afrikaner
This is clearly a political move, prioritizing race and nationality in a system long defined by humanitarian need
For Alexis, it wasn’t until reading Young’s article and learning more aboutcode-meshing, code-switching, double consciousness, and “Standard Eng-lish” that she realized how this structural linguistic racism had been harmingher since first grade.
Young's article also opened my eyes to linguistic racism I had been privileged enough to not see prior
First,the narrative erases the four decades of civil rights struggle before 1969 toend racial exclusion at white American colleges. Second, it erases the historyof the Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) that educated hundreds ofthousands of Black students before 1970. Third, it ignores the pressure thatwas building for CUNY to end its systemic exclusion of Black and Brownstudents through 1965 and the desegregation programs that did end itbetween 1965 and 1970
SAE was created in order to silence Black American voices and push segregation in education further.
She learned at once that “standard” English was thegoal and anyone who couldn’t quickly assimilate would be considered “lessthan” their peers.
Children who come from households that speak a different language feel outcasted and punished. Many aren't explained the vast dialects of the English language and how any set one isn't necessarily "correct"
To Kynard, this integrationist narrativeand stance in fact rationalized the “admissions and enrollment schemes”which have been “always used to keep students of color out of white colleges”by casting those students as “outside the bounds of school culture” either tobe excluded or “paternalistically saved”
White Americans created a system in which people of color were never intended to prosper.
Keyword Argument
Default parameter and keyword argument
keyword argument
default parameter
argument
parameter
r all. If Ben-Gurion had carried out a large expulsion and cleaned the whole country - the whole Land of Israel, as far as the Jordan River. It may yet turn out that this was his fatal mistake. If he had carried out a full expulsion - rather than a partial one - he would have stabilized the State of Israel for generations.
This quote is alarming to me because it exposes how Morris reframes ethnic cleansing as a missed opportunity rather than a moral catastrophe. His use of the phrase “cleaned the whole country” echoes the language of purification, suggesting that national stability requires erasing an entire people. The casual tone of this claim masks the immense violence it implies, turning forced removal into a tool for order and progress. What stands out most is how Morris’s reasoning reveals the deep moral corrosion of nationalist logic. By viewing human lives as obstacles to political stability, he reveals how easily the pursuit of a “state” can eclipse empathy, justice, and coexistence. The statement made me pause because it shows the historian abandoning his role as a truth-teller to become a defender of cruelty disguised as necessity. It challenges readers to confront how historical narratives can be weaponized to legitimize oppression and how the line between documenting history and endorsing it can dangerously blur.
If Ben-Gurion had carried out a large expulsion and cleaned the whole country - the whole Land of Israel, as far as the Jordan River. It may yet turn out that this was his fatal mistake. If he had carried out a full expulsion - rather than a partial one - he would have stabilized the State of Israel for generations.
austin kim-matsuda: This quote is alarming to me because it exposes how Morris reframes ethnic cleansing as a missed opportunity rather than a moral catastrophe. His use of the phrase “cleaned the whole country” echoes the language of purification, suggesting that national stability requires erasing an entire people. The casual tone of this claim masks the immense violence it implies, turning forced removal into a tool for order and progress. What stands out most is how Morris’s reasoning reveals the deep moral corrosion of nationalist logic. By viewing human lives as obstacles to political stability, he reveals how easily the pursuit of a “state” can eclipse empathy, justice, and coexistence. The statement made me pause because it shows the historian abandoning his role as a truth-teller to become a defender of cruelty disguised as necessity. It challenges readers to confront how historical narratives can be weaponized to legitimize oppression and how the line between documenting history and endorsing it can dangerously blur.
By tracking how a student responds to failure within the AI tutor, we can generate a productive struggle score
That's an idea-- using AI to measure germane cognitive load!
By analyzing the digital trace data from student interactions in shared documents and team chats
entails a radical openness to the sharing of data
systematic, personalized reinforcement
Entails explicitly outlined information about what's important to remember-- seems a little far-fetched.
But we no longer live in an age of information scarcity. The lecture is a solution to a problem we no longer have. The challenge for colleges and universities in the twenty-first century is to deliver artisanal-quality learning at an industrial scale. For decades, this has been an impossible dream. Until now.
Logic: The lecture format of learning was in place to "allow one expert to broadcast information"- which can now happen in a multitude of ways (cue "flipped classroom")- should be supplanted with at-scale personalized learning. This is the best way to scale the Socratic ideal, short of direct expert-to-learner instruction.
Cuando Gregorio ya era Papa, Silvia ya había entrado al convento y su esposo ya se había convertido en sacerdote simultáneamente
Wow
Madre de San Gregorio Magno
Del papa Gregorio el Grande jaja (damos a gracias a Dios por el papa Gregorio I). Al estilo Santa Monica (con San Agustín)