En este paso, debemos ingresar los días de las sesiones, o mejor aún, cuantos días de sesiones tuvimos, no la fecha, es decir, en 24 días, vimos 24 sesiones de clase. El paso es el siguiente

singleDigits := (1 to: 9) collect: [:each | each asString ]

Paso 1

Texto explicativo

Por último, con la instrucción anterior, los archivos se visualizan de la siguiente manera

estructurua nos movilivamos

crearemos una copia de estos enlaces en el repositorio que se encuentra en nuestro disco duro

Ahora, le diremos que queremos una colección de hedgeDocs por cada sesión y que cada una tendrá como título “Memoraias semestrales sesión número... tal”

Memoraias

daysIndexes := singledigits, doubledigits

:= (1 to: 24) collect: [:each | each asString ]

generando un indíce por cada día con la expresión “daysIndexes”

En este espacio, visualizaremos el paso a paso de cómo guardar las memorias de cada clase del seminario taller Unidades Semánticas, desarrolladas durante el semestre 2023-3 en la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana dirigida por el docente Offray Luna Cárdenas.

INSERTAR FOTO

Ejecutando el siguinte mensaje,

En primer lugar, recuperaremos las memorias de la clase por medio de sus enlaces acortados. https://is.gd/semanti23B

#1. Memorias a partir de los enlaces acortados

Date today + 3 weeks

BINARIO

Al ejecutar el comando aparece un error

(2 asString) == (2 asString).

#PharoTutorial == 'PharoTutorial'.

#PharoTutorial asString Se ejecuta la palabra “PharoTutorial” como un solo símbolo.

'PharoTutorial' asSymbol Se ejecuta la palabra “PharoTutorial” como un solo símbolo.

'a' class

El resultado para esta cadena es: This class represents the array of 8 bit wide characters.

Character allByteCharacters El código anterior permite “imprimir” o ejecutar los 256 caracteres del código extendido ASCII. Se ejecutan palabras sin sentido por lo que puede haber un problema de visualización de los simbólos latinos o romanos.

Al terminar esta guía, estarás en capacidad de

hedgeDoc metadata at: 'title' put: ('Sesión del 17 de marzo').

hedgeDoc := HedgeDoc new url: 'https://docutopia.sustrato.red/accesibilidad:23K?both# '; retrieveContents.

Shortener enlarge: commonAddress, letter asString

commonAddress, letter asString

letter asString

https://drive.google.com/file/d/16ons3MpMA-cXj5X3sPISuh9DurMZNq67/view?usp=sharing

dataWeekDailyNoteAddresses

'Data Weeks: Guardar las memorias del evento'

In a better world, I would have built this in a day, using some kind of modern, flexible HyperCard for iOS. In our actual world, I built it in about a week, and roughly half of that time was spent wrestling with different flavors of code-signing and identity provi­sioning and I don’t even know what. I waved some incense and threw some stones and the gods of Xcode allowed me to pass. Our actual world isn’t totally broken. I do not take for granted, not for one millisecond, the open source compo­nents and sample code that made this project possible. In the 21st century, as long as you’re operating within the bounds of the state of the art, program­ming can feel delight­fully Lego-like. All you have to do is rake your fingers through the bin.

Data Weeks: Guardar las memorias del evento

'16-'

repositoryFolder := FileLocator documents / 'Mutabit/Repo/'.

En Smalltalk, todo es un objeto, incluso los booleanos.

PREGUNTA ¿Que es la reificación?

Smalltalk tiene solo seis palabras clave reservadas, cada una de las cuales representa un valor de objeto particular.

An OS as an interactive image that runs independent services that communicate via message-passing.

And then, of course, browsers are themselves being likened to operating systems. Walled gardens, with no efficiency to speak of, with very little freedom, with too much leverage from the browser vendors. A perfect exploitation machine for keeping you within itself, all while it will do anything to harvest information about your activities, so it can show you some ads as soon as it can. An operating system alright. Yeah, just relax and no harm will come to you.

Moreover, browsers are not the right way to be using web anyway. See my thought on this in the Data-Supplied Web article.

he only advantage of building something in a web browser is that you can view websites right in them. If your task is not to display a webpage, or build a website, if CSS+HTML is not the limit of your imagination, then there's no reason to be building complex shit in the web browser! I can see hitching a web browser ride as a ubiquitous cross-platform graphical backend (over WebGL) if you are willing to deal with all the overhead and impact on speed. But with the libraries like SDL and Skia (which browsers use), that seems kind of pointless.

What sounds a lot more reasonable, if you want to be proficient within some ecosystem, is to pay the upfront cost of learning only the technologies that are synergetic and not redundant.

¿Por qué es importante diferenciar entre unary, binary and keyword messages?

¿De que manera influyen las mayúsculas en el mensaje?

No me es clara la diferencia entre unary messages, binary messages y keyword messages. Se entiende que depende la de cantidad de palabras o caracteres usadas para generar el mensaje.

lenguaje de programacion reflexivo orientado a objetos y tipado dinamico.”, esto que significa realmente.

Blocks are Smalltalks anonymous functions, or lambdas. They are expressed as a sequence of statements enclosed in square brackets.

{ 1 . 2 . 'hello' . #($a $b) . 3 / 4 }

Literal arrays are computed at parse time. They are expressed as a hash (#) followed by a list of literal values enclosed in parentheses:

'smalltalk' = ('small' , 'talk') "we have the same value" ('smalltalk' == ('small' , 'talk')) not "but different identity"

3 / 4 = (Fraction numerator: 3 denominator: 4)

Pregunta: ¿las anotaciones, decimales, binarias y hexadecimales el resultado siempre será positivo?

¿como visualizar lo que diferencia una de la otra?

self (lenguaje de programación: wikipedia y/o sitio oficial

Pregunta: ¿son operados que nos indican cuando no ha sido leido en su totalidad un texto por ser demasiado extenso?

Identifica los simbolos moneterios

¿ Porque se mantiene el mismo resultado si cambiaron de posicion los literales?

¿ Como se hace esa representacion grafica del clases (False, True y Boolen)?

thisContext

super

self

false

true

nil

Esto ayuda a identeificar si el contenido esta en lo correcto o nocon relacion con los booleanos

Smalltalk has just six reserved keywords, each of which represents a particular object value.

At the end of the day many of us that are innovators always find ourselves busy with the next thing we are innovating and rarely look around at the context. To be expected to look beyond the context to other forks is too much for any sane individual. because all of the forks are using trunk based development and are moving targets.

Most data flow programming environments cannot represent lambdas, and this is why the graphs always end up turning into spaghetti: you don't actually have tools to reduce repetition in the graph's structure, using the graph itself.They are successful in artist and music contexts because the graphs tend to be simple pipelines at heart. Having dealt with sufficiently complex grasshopper graphs, I disagree that it's good at arbitrary list processing, certainly compared to ordinary list operators and iterators in code.My conclusion is that a dataflow environment that does allow for lambdas and proper n-way forking would necessarily have to be an effect system in the FP sense. It's a data flow graph that computes its own continuation and which has no fixed or preset topology. It can rewire itself based on the data flowing through it.

Traditional visual environments visualize the code. They visualize static structure. But that's not what we need to understand. We need to understand what the code is doing.Visualize data, not code. Dynamic behavior, not static structure.”http://worrydream.com/#!/LearnableProgramming

Well, the best approximation we have is spreadsheets, actually. That's why they're super popular.Put the data in front, marginalize the code. Code is either "hidden" in cells where you get a live[1] preview of the data or in modules other have built but you can modify[1] if you want to.Now, how do we take this approach to the next level, that's a problem on the scale of figuring out human genetic engineering or fixing climate change :-)[1] Most of the time. relaxing 62 days ago | root | parent | next [–] First let’s figure out how to scale spreadsheets to the complexity of running a medium size business.

Before you can manipulate anything you have to define a set of affordances. If you have no affordances you have... nothing.A lot of programming is really about manually creating affordances that can be applied to specific domains. The traditional medium for this is text, with dataflow diagrams a distant second.People often forget that this is still symbolic programming. You could replace all the keywords in a language with emojis, different photos of Seattle, or hex colour codes, but we use text because it's mnemonic in a way that more abstract representations aren't.Dataflow diagrams are good as far as they go, but it doesn't take much for a visual representation to become too complex to understand. With text you can at least take it in small chunks, and abstraction/encapsulation make it relatively easy to move between different chunk levels.

We already did, it was called Lisp Machines and Smalltalk, and we are yet to fully replicate them.

To make the object less mediated, its representation should ideally be as transparent as possible. AR in this regard is much more promising than VR, since in VR the representation takes place within another representation.To make the action less mediated, the action should be able to be embodied by the (technologically extended) user, as well as being inherent to the medium which represents the subject. Here we are building a bridge between the human body and a way to represent things that physically do not exist. It's never going to be ideal, but it could be better than what we have now.

With computer interfaces, you hardly ever interact with something in an immediate way. I want a comment to appear on this site but instead I am writing this text in a white box and not where the comment would appear. All the computer interactions are mediated by these in-between steps. (An example for unmediated interaction would be cooking. What you chop is what you get

To me, the the most interesting part of Bret Victors ideas lie in the re-embodiment of disembodied interactions. The computers choreograph us anyhow, but often in a very poor and limited way – only our fingertips and our eyes move a bit. Why not make the choreography of interaction richer? Why not create a computer-aided full-body choreography of interaction?

I think if we divorce the idea of direct data manipulation from exclusively non-textual representation, we are slowly making progress in this direction through traditional notebooks (e.g. Jupyter) and notebook successors like Clerk (see Moldable Live Programming With Clerk[1]).These are not the sweeping, fundamental changes that Bret Victor envisioned, but we are collectively moving toward more interactive programming. Imagine modern web development without hot reloading.Clojure is the language where I see this happening most, and which is seeing the most expansion toward "visualization and interactivity as part of a the backend dev experience".[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bs3QX92kYA

2 raisedTo: 5

3

4

+

cuando compartes, publicas o subes contenido que se encuentra protegido por derechos de propiedad intelectual en nuestros Productos, o en relación con ellos, nos otorgas una licencia internacional, libre de regalías, sublicenciable, transferible y no exclusiva para alojar, usar, distribuir, modificar, publicar, copiar, mostrar o exhibir públicamente y traducir tu contenido, así como para crear trabajos derivados de él (de conformidad con tu configuración de privacidad y de la app). Esto significa, por ejemplo, que, si compartes una foto en Facebook, nos concedes permiso para almacenarla, copiarla y compartirla con otros (por supuesto, de conformidad con tu configuración), como proveedores de servicios o Productos de Meta que respaldan esos servicios y productos. La licencia finalizará una vez que se elimine tu contenido de nuestros sistemas.

tactical tech

grassroot communities give us

Being part of the process of

This public interpersonal wikis are ways

Usually this means a

local pocket infrastructures that interconnect interpersonal wikis of and from community open information, in this case will be around the “The Kit”.

introduce, explore and comment

into

way

80 years old

train.

low connectivity

https://docutopia.sustrato.red/dataweek:16#

live real-time and “wikified” workshop documentation

Grafoscopio community

to facilitate

of data and digital media.

the dichotomous nature of many of the debates over the future of the book (i.e., print vs. digital) can be traced back to a much larger struggle related to power structures and to who controls (new) knowledge and communication systems within academia.

For the majority of scholars, the printed book format produced in an academic setting (i.e., published and distributed by an academic publisher) has thus become synonymous with formal scholarly communication. With the development of digital and multimodal forms of communication, this analogous relationship between print (and all that it entails) and formal scholarly communication is becoming less determined, and the future of the scholarly book is once again heavily debated.12

Living Books will focus predominantly on affirmative projects (and related ideas and concepts), projects that are exploring alternative futures for the book, the difficulties mentioned thus far notwithstanding.

This is for the simple reason that it can be argued that the humanities have always been in crisis and that humanities book publishing has never been financially self-sustainable.9 Similarly, the intention here is not to overcome this condition via the route of technological utopianism (wherein innovative digital solutions will resolve the crisis) or the search for new sustainable business models or by defending an idealized past system of values associated with the (printed) book and the humanities. Instead, it might be more useful to embrace this “crisis” or messiness to some extent, in order to explore the potentialities

The mechanisms behind this situation, more commonly known as the so-called monograph crisis, have by now been well-discussed and are, as chapter 3 sets out, ultimately connected to the overall neoliberalization of the university.

Nonetheless, the consequences are wide-reaching. In particular, this state of affairs influences the job prospects of early-career researchers, for whom, more often than not, it remains a challenge to get their first book published. It also affects the quality of scholarly research in that it remains difficult to publish academic monographs that are highly specialized, difficult or radical, experimental or multimodal, or that fall outside current vogues in academic publishing, making them harder to market or incorporate into a specific series or publication list. Indeed, we have grown accustomed to a situation in which a book finding a publisher tends to be determined by its marketability, not by its value or quality as a piece of scholarship.

a situation has emerged wherein the present arrangements tend to sustain the interest of established stakeholders, inhibiting wider access to scholarly research and experimentation with new forms of scholarship and scholarly communication. These arrangements are predisposed to be repetitive and conservative instead of being open to alterity. In this sense, they continue to reproduce what can be perceived as essentializing aspects of the book, which include a fetishization of both the author and the book-object.

Instead of seeing the monograph as a fixed object, I present it here as an elaborate set of scholarly practices, structures of knowledge production, and discursive formations, which together enact the dynamic and emergent materiality of this medium. At the same time, in a complex interplay of relations, the scholarly book helps to shape the various formats, debates, and actants that are involved in the processes of knowledge creation. This double aspect of the book, as both enacted and enacting, means that the monograph occupies an important nodal point in this meshwork of relations and thus plays a vital role in determining what kinds of knowledge are possible.

one of the first experiments in humanities book publishing to rigorously explore the potential implications and possibilities of the digital medium for the humanities monograph, for the humanities, and, ultimately, for the human.

GUÍA PARA LA IMPLEMENTACIÓN DEL DECRETO 1421 DE 2017ATENCIÓN EDUCATIVA A PERSONAS CON DISCAPACIDAD EN EL MARCODE LA EDUCACIÓN INCLUSIVA

Algunos de los resultados presentadosaquí corresponden a los hallazgos en cuanto a lapreparación de saberes y oficios para la constituciónde familia, nacimiento, cuidados y creencias, dieta,enfermedades y rito de la pelazón, las cuales sontemáticas emergentes que surgieron a partir de unacercamiento a la realidad social y cultural de la co-munidad.

seguir hablando de «capitalismotardío» como si fuera a conllevarautomáticamente el colapso industrial y unaposterior revolución social.

Esto es a lo que me refiero por «liberación en elimaginario». Pensar cómo sería vivir en un mundoen el que la gente tuviera realmente el poder dedecidir por sí misma, individual y colectivamente,a qué tipo de comunidades pertenecer y qué tipode identidades adoptar, es una tareaverdaderamente difícil. Y hacer posible esemundo, algo todavía más difícil. Significaríacambiarlo casi todo y tener que enfrentarse a laoposición persistente, y en última instanciaviolenta, de quienes se están beneficiando delestado actual de cosas. Lo que sí es fácil esdedicarse a escribir como si estas identidadescreadas libremente ya existiesen, lo que nos evitatener que plantearnos los problemas complejos eintratables del grado de implicación de nuestropropio trabajo

Pero de hecho nadie sabe cómoelegirían definirse a sí mismos la mayoría denorteamericanos si desapareciese el racismoinstitucional, si la gente tuviera una verdaderalibertad para definirse como quisiera

PaulGilroy le gusta denominar el «mundosobredesarrollado

ugerente

La retóricadel «consumo creativo», en particular, podríaconsiderarse la ideología del nuevo mercadoglobal: un mundo en que cualquiercomportamiento humano puede ser clasificadocomo producción, intercambio o consumo. Estaideología sostiene que lo que orienta elintercambio es la inclinación fundamentalmentehumana de búsqueda del beneficio y que es igualen todo el mundo, mientras que el consumo esuna forma de establecer la propia identidad (sobrela producción se prefiere no hablar siempre quesea posible). En el terreno comercial todos somosiguales, lo que nos diferencia es lo que hacemoscon las cosas una vez en casa

Elantropólogo debe demostrar constantemente quesea cual sea el mecanismo a través del cual seintenta engañar, homogeneizar o manipular a ungrupo (la publicidad, los culebrones, las formas dedisciplina laboral o los sistemas legales impuestospor el Estado), nunca se consigue. De hecho, lagente se apropia de y reinventa creativamentetodo aquello que le llega desde arriba y lo hacepor medios que ni sus autores podrían siquieraimaginar

la antropología es una especie depopulismo amplio. Al menos no nos posicionamos,en un momento dado, junto a las élites o junto aquien las apoya. Estamos con la gente humilde.Pero dado que en la práctica la mayoría de losantropólogos trabajamos en las universidades(que son cada día más globales), o bien enconsultorías de marketing o en la ONU, ocupandopuestos dentro del aparato de gobierno global,quizá todo se reduzca a una declaración fiel yritualizada de nuestra deslealtad hacia la éliteglobal de la cual formamos parte comoacadémicos (a pesar de nuestra marginalidad).¿Qué forma adopta este populismo en lapráctica? Ante todo implica demostrar que lagente humilde que es objeto de estudio se resistecon éxito a algún tipo de poder o influenciaglobalizadora que se le impone desde arriba

Muchosantropólogos escriben como si su trabajo tuvierauna relevancia política clara, en un tono que da aentender que consideran lo que hacen algobastante radical y, desde luego, de izquierdas.¿Pero en qué consiste realmente esta política?Cada día que pasa resulta más difícil saberlo.¿Suelen los antropólogos ser anticapitalistas? Laverdad es que no resulta fácil encontrar a algunoque hable bien del capitalismo. Muchos describenla época en la que vivimos como la del«capitalismo tardío», como si solo con declararque el capitalismo está cercano a su fin pudieranacelerar el mismo. Sin embargo, resulta difícil darcon algún antropólogo que haya propuestorecientemente alguna alternativa al capitalismo.

para quienes no representa ningúnproblema hablar del deseo, de la imaginación, elyo o la soberanía, como si dichos conceptoshubieran sido inventados por Platón o Aristóteles,desarrollados por Kant o el marqués de Sade, ycomo si jamás hubieran sido motivo de discusiónfuera de las tradiciones literarias de Europaoccidental o Norteamérica

Yo no creo queesto se pueda atribuir solamente a una reaccióncomprensible frente a la propensión de la derechaa hacer grandes discursos sobre la naturalezahumana para justificar instituciones sociales muyconcretas y particularmente nefastas (la violación,la guerra, el capitalismo de libre mercado), aunquesin duda se debe en parte a ello.

académico es en gran medida la capacidad deestablecer derechos de propiedad sobre una ciertaforma de conocimiento y asegurarse, por otra, quelos demás no tengan demasiado acceso a éste

Institucionalmente, como fuenteimaginativa, es responsable de la creación denuevas formas sociales y de la revalorización otransformación de las viejas

el contrapoderadopta la forma de lo que denominaríamosinstituciones de democracia directa,consenso y mediación, es decir, formas decontrolar e intervenir públicamente en losconflictos

que estas zonasespectrales siempre son el fulcro de laimaginación moral, y también una especie dereserva creativa de un potencial cambiorevolucionario. Es precisamente desde estosespacios invisibles, en su mayoría, al poder, dedonde proviene en realidad el potencial para lainsurrección y la extraordinaria creatividad socialque aparece, no se sabe muy bien de dónde, enlos momentos revolucionarios

Elmundo contemporáneo está lleno de esosespacios anárquicos, y cuanto más éxito tienen,menos oímos hablar de ellos. Ni siquiera cuandose acaba violentamente con ellos nos llegan a losforasteros noticias de su existencia

Si uno combina esta actitud con una resistenciapasiva constante a las instituciones estatales y laelaboración de formas de autogobierno autónomasy relativamente igualitarias, ¿no estaríamos acasoante una revolución?

De acuerdo, pero ¿qué tienetodo esto que ver con el tipo de comunidadesinsurreccionalistas a las que se refierennormalmente los teóricos revolucionarios cuandoemplean el concepto de “contrapoder”?».Aquí quizá sea útil analizar las diferencias quehay entre los dos primeros casos y el tercero,porque las comunidades malgaches que conocí en1990 vivían en una situación en muchos sentidosinsurreccional

en cada caso existe un contrastesorprendente entre un universo cosmológicotumultuoso y el proceso social, que busca lamediación, la llegada a un consenso. Ninguna deestas sociedades es completamente igualitaria,pues existen ciertas formas clave de dominio, almenos la de los hombres sobre las mujeres y losadultos sobre los más jóvenes.

se creía que era un error que unadulto diera órdenes a otro, especialmente si lohacía de forma continuada, por lo que inclusoinstituciones como el trabajo asalariado seconsideraban moralmente sospechosas

el poderse institucionalizaba como un poder maligno ycada nueva generación surgía un movimientode caza de brujos para desenmascarar a losculpables y poder destruir, de forma efectiva,cualquier estructura emergente de autoridad

No existían instituciones políticasmayores que el poblado; de hecho, cualquiercosa que se asemejara un poco a unainstitución política se consideraba sospechosaper se o, para ser más precisos, rodeada de unáurea de horror oculto.

Los mundos invisibles que lasrodean son, literalmente campos de batalla. Escomo si la labor incansable de lograr el consensoocultara una violencia intrínseca constante, oquizá sería más apropiado decir que en la prácticaes el proceso mediante el cual se calibra y secontiene esa violencia intrínseca

En las sociedadesigualitarias, que suelen poner un gran énfasis enla creación y el mantenimiento del consensocomunal

These wiki books were designed to interrogate and break down barriers between the humanities and the sciences by repurposing previously published science research and clustering it around a specific topic (e.g., energy, air, pharmacology, or bioethics) accompanied by an editorial introduction. This experiment in connecting and reusing various open access research materials—including articles, books, texts, data, images, video, and sound—and in exploring collective writing and open editing was designed to challenge “the physical and conceptual limitations” of the codex book, but it also questioned the various institutions and material practices that accompany it (e.g., the liberal humanist author, copyright, its aesthetics of bookishness). Yet more than that, it was an experiment in reimagining the book itself as living and collaborative, as an iterative and processual form of cocreation.

Centre for Postdigital Cultures

\faMailReply, como se ve en la figura @fig:hyp-comment.

essentializing attributes or properties, such as openness and fluidity, are also accorded to the digital format. I therefore also do not want to claim that the potential for increased collaboration and open forms of publishing will be a guaranteed outcome of “digital innovation.” Experimenting with new forms of communication is hard work, involving more than only the overcoming of technological barriers. As I outline throughout Living Books, it also entails a critical redesign of scholarship. Digital promises and utopias will similarly face scrutiny. It is my intention to examine those aspects that might actually be exciting, experimental, and perhaps more ethical in digital scholarship.

Este es un documento abierto, experimental y colaborativo sobre como crear documentos con esas tres propiedades y por tanto se usa a sí mismo como ejemplo,

The idea is that procrastination is often a short term mood repair initiated by your subconscious. The problem and the decision to solve it are both happening below the level of conscious thought. The solution is to find a way to identify and then solve that mood at a conscious level. Journaling is one way to do that.

Putting those thoughts into a journal moves them from feelings that secretly rule my decisions to rational concepts that I can analyze and solve.

Basically I wanted to merge every tiddler into one ORG file.

Generate HTML and meta files

Now let’s generate the single HTML file:

David Alfonso has done a great job and put together a repository that helps you with the export of tiddlers. All you need is to export all your tiddlers bundled as one single HTML and then follow the instructions in the README.

After going down the Emacs rabbit hole, I’ve adopted ORG mode as my main file format for writing documents, exporting these to other formats (PDF, markdown, Confluence, Jira and many others), creating diagrams (mainly plantuml), presentations, writing technical documentation and hopefully some day for publishing a whole book. For the note-taking phase I write my notes in ORG mode and create a rudimentary outline sorted by chapters/sections. Usually I use the same structure to create my blog posts from (like I did in the book summaries). Extracting pieces of information for individual tiddlers, however, tends to be a time-intensive process. I’ve managed to use the Tiddlywiki API within Emacs but my Elisp skills are still not good for doing more advanced stuff like:

It became not only my primary editor, but also my RSS feeds reader, mail client, YouTube video player, IDE, API client… I basically live in Emacs Here is my config.org and try to avoid as many context switches as possible.

Among the many packages I’ve used, stroll has definitely changed the way I interacted with Tiddlywiki. It allowed me to focus more on the note-taking process by dividing the screen into 2 columns. This allowed me to work on different tiddlers simultaneously. Still it took me hours to process my notes and digitize them into Tiddlywiki. I guess the UI kind of slowed me down, mostly because I’m a keyboard-centric user and don’t use the mouse that often.

While I initially started using just one single HTML file for my tiddlers, I soon switched over to the nodeJS installation. This still has better benefits like: you can run the instance in Docker install tiddlywiki and its dependencies without messing around with your system you’ll get multiple “flat” files (.tid files are in plain text) you can apply sed, awk, bash foo to extract/modify data even if Tiddlywiki will be discontinued some day, you’ll still be able to import your notes in whatever note-taking syntax

At the abstract level of empirical investigation concerned with the theory of science is communication with slip boxes certainly only one of many possibilities. The accidents of reading play a role just as much as misunderstandings resulting from interdisciplinary thought processes. We can confirm hat communication with slip boxes may be considered as a functional equivalent and that this approach, compared to others, has many advantages as far as speed, and mutual adaptability is concerned.

The role of accidents in the theory of science is not disputed, If you employ evolutionary models, accidents assume a most important role. Without them, nothing happens, no progress is made. Without variation in the given material of ideas, there are no possibilities of examining and selecting novelties. The real problem thus becomes therefore one of producing accidents with sufficiently enhanced probabilities for selection. As we know from the analysis of processes of mutation in biological evolution, mutations are complex and highly regulated events, which only because they are preselected at their own level exhibit that kind of stability that is the presupposition for selective permanence. They are accidents in the sense that they are not tuned to the factors that select them, but they depend themselves on complex orders.

In comparison with this structure, which offers possibilities of connection that can be actualized, the importance of what has actually been noted is secondary. Many of the notes will soon become unusable or cannot be used at a given occasion. This holds both for excerpts which are only useful in the case of especially remarkable formulations and for our own deliberations. Theoretical publications do therefore not result from simply copying what can already be found in the slip box. The communication with the slip box becomes fruitful only at a high level of generalization, namely that of establishing communicative relations of relations. And it becomes productive only at the moment of evaluation, and is thus bound to a certain time and is to a high degree accidental.

They also do not fall into the limits of what is obvious because we must cross the border between the one who takes note and the slip box itself. Every new entry can of course become isolated, like with the key word “Picasso” for the Picasso exhibition. If, however, we seek communication with the slip box, we must seek internal possibilities for linkings which result in the unexpected (i.e. information).

Naturally, independence presupposes a minimal measure of intrinsic complexity. The slip box needs a number of years in order to reach critical mass. Until then, it functions as a mere container from which we can retrieve what we put in. This changes with its growth in size and complexity. On the one hand, the number of approaches and occasions for questions increases. The slip box becomes a universal instrument. You can place almost everything in it, and this not just ad hoc and in isolation, but with internal possibilities of connections [with other contents]. It becomes a sensitive system that internally reacts to many ideas, as long as they can be noted down. If we ask, for instance, why on the one hand museums are empty, while on the other hand exhibitions of paintings by Monet, Picasso, or Medici are too crowded, the slip box accepts this question under the perspective of “preference for what is temporally limited.”

If you wish to educate a partner in communication, it will be good to provide him with independence from the beginning. A slip box, which has been made according to the suggestions just given can exhibit great independence. There may be equally apt ways to reach this goal. The described reduction to a fixed, but merely formal order of placement and the resulting combination of order and disorder is, however, one of these ways.

Every note is only an element which receives its quality only from the network of links and back-links within the system. A note that is not connected to this network will get lost in the card file and ill be forgotten by it. Its rediscovery depends on accidents and on the vagary that this rediscovery means something at the time it is found.

As a result of extensive work with this technique a kind of secondary memory will arise, an alter ego with who we can constantly communicate. It proves to be similar to our own memory in that it does not have a thoroughly constructed order of its entirety, not hierarchy, and most certainly no linear structure like a book. Just because of this, it gets its own life, independent of its author. The entirety of these notes can only be described as a disorder, but at the very least it is a disorder with non-arbitrary internal structure. Some things will get lost (versickern), some notes we will never see again. On the other hand, there will be preferred centers, formation of lumps and regions with which we will work more often than with others. There will be complexes of ideas that are conceived at large, but which will never be completed; there will be incidental ideas which started as links from secondary passages and which are continuously enriched and expand so that they will tend increasingly to dominate system. To sum up: this technique guarantees that its order which is merely formal does not become a hindrance but adapts to the conceptual development.

The alternation of numbers and alphabetic characters in numbering the slips helps memory and is an optical aid when we search for them, but it is insufficient. Therefore we need a register of keywords that we constantly update.

The fixed filing place needs no system. It is sufficient that we give every slip a number which is easily seen (in or case on the left of the first line) and that we never change this number and thus the fixed place of the slip. This decision about structure is that reduction of the complexity of possible arrangements, which makes possible the creation of high complexity in the card file and thus makes possible its ability to communicate in the first place.

Applied to collections of notes, we can choose the route of thematic specialization (such as notes about governmental liability) or we can choose the route of an open organization. We decided for the latter. After more than twenty-six years of successful and only occasionally difficult co-operation, we can now vouch for the success or at least the viability of this approach. Naturally, the route that creates a partner in communication that is meant for the long haul, is open, and not thematically limited (but only limiting itself), makes certain structural demands on the partners. You might, given the great trust that is still being put in the abilities of human beings, trust that I fulfill these presuppositions. But what about the slip box? How must it be conceived that he will acquire the corresponding communicative competence?

Put differently, the variety in communicating systems increases when it may happen that the two partners successfully communicate in the face of different comparative goals. (This means that it is useful for the other partner.) This requires the addition of randomness (Zufall) into the system—randomness in the sense that the agreement of the different comparative schemata is not been fixed, or that the information which is transmitted by communication is correct, but rather that this happens (or does not happen) “at the occasion” of communication.

One of the most basic presuppositions of communication is that the partners can mutually surprise each other.

For both of us, that is myself and my slip box, it is easy to think of systems theory.

I, like Luhmann, see writing as integral to complex thinking.4

Rarely do I engage with my zettelkasten with the intention of finding a single, specific note on, say, basket weaving (full disclosure: I am not a basket weaver). Instead, I look for "clusters" of notes 2. I look for areas of my zettelkasten that are bulking up, pushing at the seams, tapping me on the shoulder saying, "Hey, you seem to be taking a lot of notes on basket weaving these days. Maybe it's time you converted some of these basket weaving notes into an article on basket weaving?" This is, in part, how many of us work with our zettelkasten, and is one of the principle workflows discussed in Ahrens' How to Take Smart Notes. Those of us who use the zettelkasten to maintain a writing schedule can let our zettelkasten "tell us" what we've been thinking about and what of this thinking might be ready for expression. This is how a zettelkasten can become, to use Niklas Luhmann's term, a "partner of communication."

When developing systems, people often focus on current or immediate functionality. That is shortsighted and dangerous. Functionality is indeed a business asset, but the ability to adapt to changes in the surrounding environment depends on the non-functional parts. The New Jersey unemployment system did its job just fine until recently. Its functionality did not deteriorate. It was the environment that changed and this made the system is no longer adequate. It now needs to be recycled to match the new reality.To recycle a system implies taking it apart and refurbishing it for other purposes. However, before we can take it apart, we first have to understand the parts.

CONCLUSIONES Y RECOMENDACIONES

Imagen 36 Aviso de palabras clave o abreviatura. Fuente: Elaboración propia.

lacual hace posible la consecución completa de los objetivos específicos planteados

o, sin embargo

“El diseño siempre debe mantener informados a los usuarios sobre lo que estásucediendo, a través de comentarios apropiados dentro de un periodo de tiemporazonable”

, sin embargo,

18 a 45 años

Imagen 5 Clasificación de casos en las evaluaciones de indagación. Fuente: Elaboración propia

En consecuencia a esto, en la Imagen 4 se hacen explicitas 3 fases o tareasprincipales en el presente trabajo:

3.2. Específicos

marketing

TERMINOLOGIA

PROTOTIPO COMO HIPÓTESIS

Tensiones

. .

Tiddlers.

prototipo

ecológicas