Een lens focust op wat er al is. Je richt hem op een vraag: met wie heb ik het afgelopen jaar samengewerkt? Waar was ik in maart? Welke projecten lopen er met deze organisatie?
a life lens focuses on what is there, who did I work with this year, where was I at some point, what projects was someone involved in. Pulling that info from your various sources.
Een lens creëert niets nieuws. De informatie is er al: je transacties, je contacten, je locaties, je afspraken, je notities. Die data bestaat, verspreid over tientallen apps. Maar het is een bende van niet te verbinden informatie.
A lens does not create anything new, all the information is already there, but it lives fragmented over a bunch of different apps. Unconnected.
Een Life Lens System is een manier om vanuit vele perspectieven naar je eigen leven te kijken, gebruikmakend van de informatie waarover je al beschik
Definition: a life lens system is a way to look at your own life from a range of perspectives.
ThetaOS is een Life Lens System
[[Martijn Aslander]] calls his personal toolset a 'life lens system'
PKM gaat over ideeën en kennis. Life tracking gaat over meten. Een dashboard is iets waar je naar kijkt. Een CRM is voor klanten, ThetaOS is iets heel anders, met allemaal elementen ervan. Maar wat?
[[Martijn Aslander]] struggled for words to describe what he built for himself, at mix of life tracking, pkm, crm, dashboards and more. What is the amalgam of that?
KYC laws have been around in finance for decades, it isn't a stretch to apply them to VPNs accepting credit-cards.
This is an interesting and likely observation. Although it is disrupting banking increasingly where KYC is causing large groups to become underbanked, out of an excess of caution by the banks.
Expansion of government digital ID's and various "think of the children" laws will eventually make their way all the way to personal blogs.
Not likely. This is an Anglo-saxon perspective, wrt national id's aversion. They've been around digitally for a generation already across the EU, used online and off, and hasn't had that impact (e.g. Denmark, Spain, Estonia, Netherlands)
Right now, the "indieweb" is a reactionary blip to the corporatization of the internet. What we call the "IndieWeb" is what the web used to be, and what (byits namesake at least), it should be. How can you call Instagram part of a "web" or a "network" when they don't even let you post links off its app? That's not a web!!!
word. The breakout should be not being reactionary but a forward looking stance.
I think the most realistic prediction is slow growth, and maturation and then merge back into the "normal" web.
IndieWeb is a 2011 concept, back when the silos were much less dominant, and a long way from being synonym with the web itself. So slow grow is what it has had for 15 yrs now, making it the most likely path indeed. Not much impact though, the community isn't set up for broader appeal. I moved on too, and I was low hanging fruit for the community to involve. It's not spreading for lack of narrative, appeal and visibility. Spreading is the alternative to silo'd growth, and IndieWeb is not achieving that.
Cory Doctorow's recommendations on laws encouraging "Adversarial Interoperability" are passed. Not long after, the walls around Facebook, Twitter and Tiktok's gardens begin to erode. The platforms do not die a sudden and violent death, bringing down all the creators with them. Instead the metaphor of the web comes back in force, with links between all aspects of the web blossoming.
Interop as the longest shot prediction. Vgl the realisation at Semic by the people there that interoperability is actually the single way out of hyperscaler lock-in. Vgl [[Francesca Bria]] So perhaps not that far fetched for the coming 5 years. Def the angle I need to look at more. -[ ] build overview of European interoperability efforts on diff levels / sectors #geonovumtb #120mins
This will be helped by increased "re-shoring" efforts of many Western Governments to bring "technological sovereignty" to web infrastructure, reducing our reliance on such a small group of American companies. This results in a whole bunch of small, local web hosting services popping up in each country, offering forum hosting with the servers within the country with technical and legal structures especially tailored for their respective markets.
Draws parallel between federation / small multiples, and tech sovereignty from silo'd hyperscalers. Vgl my notes on alternatives to Silicon Valley type scaling as only game in town.
In response, small independent forums experiance a resurgance in popularity as they become the new norm for organising local communities, including local sports teams, suburban community groups and music sharing
predicts a resurgence in small forums. I see a parallel with small ActivityPub instances. A building block of #netag too, wrt social symmetry
LinkTree" and their competitors come up with "EventPages" and create a spec for standardised event sharing across different platforms. This enables platform agnostic event sharing for peoples music gigs, personal parties, and more, with the organisers no having to remember to keep every page up to date, since there is only one page. Furthermore, the events can spread organically even to platforms the organiser isn't on, since it is standardised. This means that an a band can plan their gig on EventPages and posted to Facebook, but a fam can share it too mastodon with a few button presses.
EventPages is a proposed spec for event sharing, by LinkTree and others. #openvraag is it using ActivityPub that has events in its ActivityStreams, that no one ever uses? Vgl https://www.zylstra.org/blog/2023/09/the-search-for-an-os-meet-up-replacement-mobilizon-edition/
I am making three predictions. What I would like to see in the next 5 years, what I expect to happen, and what I think the biggest risks are.
Cameron Jones (Austr) 3 views on IndieWeb 1) wish 2) expectation 3) risk
Where do you see the IndieWeb in 2030?
ogp action plan in its new form as submitted to parliament, 19-12-2025.
Report on adapting the 2023-2027 Open government action plan. [[Paul Suijkerbuijk]] had a role in this report, MCOIG.
City of Amsterdam, 'aiming for digital autonomy', March 2025. Amsterdam Digitale Autonomie in Zotero
Selectiviteitsscan: veilige toetsing van algoritmes
PDF downloaded. Selectiviteitsscan: veilige toetsing van algoritmes in Zotero
Casus UWV-algoritmeAls toepassing van de Selectiviteitsscan heeft het UWV een selectie-algoritme door het CPB laten toetsen: de Sollicitatiescan WW. Dit algoritme helpt bij het selecteren van dossiers die medewerkers bekijken om te beoordelen of iemand extra ondersteuning nodig heeft bij het solliciteren. De analyse laat zien dat bij zowel het algoritme als de medewerkers de groepssamenstelling in de selectie verschilt van een neutrale referentiegroep. In de referentiegroep heeft 37% een migratieachtergrond; het algoritme komt uit op 38% en medewerkers op 43%. Bij elk selectieproces zijn enige verschillen te verwachten, en in dit geval zijn die bij het algoritme kleiner dan bij medewerkers. De Selectiviteitsscan laat zien dát er verschillen zijn; het is aan de eigenaar van het algoritme om verschillen te duiden en rechtvaardigen.
De testcasus ging om UWV gegevens, algo lag dichter bij neutraliteit dan de medewerkers zelf, maar niet geheel neutraal. UWV is zelf aan zet om te bedenken of ze iets met de uitkomsten moeten.
Het is daarom belangrijk om te controleren of deze algoritmes bepaalde groepen niet benadelen. Dat is nu vaak lastig, omdat organisaties gevoelige gegevens, zoals leeftijd of migratieachtergrond, niet kunnen gebruiken. De Selectiviteitsscan biedt hiervoor een oplossing. Organisaties uploaden hun selectie naar de beveiligde microdataomgeving van het CBS, waar een onafhankelijke partij de analyse doet. De organisatie krijgt alleen de uitkomsten te zien; de gevoelige persoonsgegevens blijven volledig afgeschermd.
Ah, it uses the CBS protected data working environment (also for the DGA). This means the debiasing is not done without personal data but without the organisation concerned seeing that data. Third party testing basically, with CBS being that party.
CPB heeft selectiviteitsscan ontwikkeld om bias in algo's te checken zonder daarvoor persoonsgegevens te hoeven gebruiken.
In oktober is het geïntensiveerd toezicht door de AP op de gemeente beëindigd. Een nieuw team ging voortvarend door met de taak om gegevensbescherming te optimaliseren. Signalen over de omvang van extern dataverkeer waren aanleiding voor nader onderzoek.
They just completed a stricter regime by the DPA, and then immediately this comes up afterwards. Ouch. It surfaced bc they were monitoring network traffic volumes. That says to me they also know who did the uploading
Een algemene interne bewustwordingscampagne op het gebied van gegevensbescherming en privacy. Deze wordt voortgezet, met de focus op het verbeteren van AI-geletterdheid (hoe kun je veilig en verantwoord omgaan met AI).Op 18 november 2025 is de AI-gedragscode vastgesteld en er is een plan van aanpak voor de verdere verbetering van de privacy opgesteld.
Both these things, internal training and an AI operational code, are common in gov agencies. Here they are too late, and it's uncertain anyway they would have had effect. Any person who thinks nothing of uploading internal documents into a public website won't be held back by a rulebook they would not have read.
OpenAI is verzocht om de bestanden die vanuit Eindhoven zijn geüpload te verwijderen.
OpenAI requested to delete uploaded documents. Hardly possible I suspect, and definitely not something one can verify.
De monitoring van het dataverkeer naar externe websites is aangescherpt.
Eindhoven monitors their network for the type of outgoing connections. Apparently that until now dit not include publicly available algogens
Openbare AI-websites, zoals ChatGPT, zijn meteen geblokkeerd. Medewerkers kunnen sinds 23 oktober alleen Copilot binnen de beveiligde gemeente-omgeving gebruiken.
As result of the data breach, all OpenAI products have been banned internally. Only MS Copilot, embedded in their MS office suite is available.
Gemeente Eindhoven 'lekte' persoonsgegevens naar 'publieke AI sites'. Ze weten niet precies wat er is gebeurd, maar dit leest alsof iemand binnen de gemeente een reeks interne documenten of gegevens in een prompt heeft gegooid.
The new litmus test isn’t “Does it scale?” It’s: “Does it spread? Does it take root? Can it compost and regrow?”
very much yes. Scaling is useless metaphor. Spread, evolution much more. Effective behaviour is contagious. Invisible hand of networks / communities [[Of Scaling TV Salons and the Invisible Hand of Networks – Interdependent Thoughts 20250803205329]]
So the real work is mediation. Not purity, not retreat, but balancing these tensions in practice: holding space where native paths can grow without being co-opted or crushed, while at the same time still reaching out to shift the wider terrain.
Systems convening, social learning landscapes [[Systems convening Wenger Trayner 20230825170358]]
The problem arises when less-native, often externally imposed systems (driven by capitalist or institutional agendas) treat these messy, friction-full spaces as broken or backwards.
The likelihood of it increases with social distance (no community) and with places where the underlying logic is different (vgl [[Waarheid en kennis kent historische periodes 20250914161603]] Foucault's periods of epistemic assumptions), at a smaller scale), clashes of differently positions 'Overton' type of windows of accepted discourse, and Rorty being forced wording the new in the language of the old. It's a language came underneath.
It’s important to recognise that friction – the mess, the slowness, the need for constant negotiation – is not a flaw in native paths, it’s a virtue. It’s how trust, mutuality, and accountability are sustained over time.
again yes. (Same is true for e.g. the EU. What others see as it weaknesses, endless talk and no swift action, is precisely why it endures and has more resilience and robustness than acknowledged)
This is the norm across many #4opens spaces: a near-total lack of interest in building or maintaining shared paths. It’s a textbook case of right-wing Tragedy of the Commons. Developers show up when it suits them, use the space for their narrow needs, then drift off without contributing to the upkeep. They treat community like free infrastructure – something passive they can extract from – rather than a living, tended path we need.
By def, we're not talking about community then. The behaviour mentioned is that of those who do not think they're part of a bigger whole here. Then by def whatever output is there to just use, as there is no social contract involved. Social asymmetry then is a given, and thus a breakdown of commons.
It needs to be said, a community is only viable if enough people care enough to keep it relevant.
Not logical, though still true in a sense. It's only a community if a group cares enough to keep it relevant and thus viable. You can't 'start a community' and then complain people don't contribute. It only becomes a community when people do.
soweit ich weiß – das älteste deutschsprachige Blog, das seit dem Start durchweg aktiv war und immer noch ist. Der erste Artikel erschien am 3.3.1999
Likely the oldest still active German language blog, since March 1999 by Claudia Klinger. https://www.claudia-klinger.de/digidiary/ Just subscribed, I don't think I encountered it ever before
I think of this now as the difference between living in a house you built that requires some effort to visit and going into a town square
Vgl Blogging as front porch https://www.zylstra.org/blog/2004/05/your_blog_is_yo/ very 2004!
if they wanted to respond to you, they had to do it on their own blog, and link back. The effect of this was that there were few equivalents of the worst aspects of social media that broke through.
There was social symmetry. If you wanted to be nasty you had to do it on your own site. Consequences were for yourself. Why on things like Mastodon I prefer small to tiny instances, so that the people on an instance have the same sense of social symmetry and give and take come from the same social distance.
The growth of social media in particular has wiped out a particular kind of blogging that I sometimes miss: a text-based dialogue between bloggers that required more thought and care than dashing off 180 or 240 characters and calling it a day. In order to participate in the dialogue, you had to invest some effort
Indeed, blogs as distributed conversations. Still on the hunt for that effect.
What made blogging different, by Elizabeth Spiers (cofounder of Gawker in 2002)
Nice, a good old end of year list of recommended other bloggers. Blogging vibes as if 2005!
Jeremy Keith on the importance of blog responses on people's own blogs. It makes it symmetric and a conversation, making misbehaving basically a non-thing. He asks about not showing webmentions of likes and boosts. I keep them for discovery, so that other readers maybe connect to eachother.
copying sqlite databases from remote sources can be done faster by .dump it to a text file, this will be smaller than the db if you have lots of indexes (to speed queries up) then compress the text file download, unzip, and reconstruct locally as sqlite db
https://github.com/tnajdek/zotero-api-client (JavaScript) https://github.com/urschrei/pyzotero (Python) https://github.com/fcheslack/libZotero (PHP and Python)
Thre are existing code libraries for Javascript and PHP (and Python) into Zotero
Zotero api
Calibre API documentation.
There is an experimental Node.js module to natively support sqlite. You can have a sqlite db in memory during the execution of a program, for temp data. And use the file based dbs.
Node.js is primarily used to build network programs such as web servers.[29] The most significant difference between Node.js and PHP is that most functions in PHP block until completion (commands execute only after previous commands finish), while Node.js functions are non-blocking (commands execute concurrently and use callbacks to signal completion or failure).[29]
node.js differs from php in that it supports concurrent command execution.
FreshRSS supports the databases SQLite (built-in),
Fresh RSS is sqlite
dbbrowser for sqlite, installed, works
FOSS tool for sqlite.
tool to browse sqlite databases, but also a bunch of others. Costs 100USD though
Limitations and Considerations While SQLite is powerful and versatile, it’s important to understand its limitations:ezstandalone.cmd.push(function () { ezstandalone.showAds(119); }); Concurrency: SQLite uses file-based locking, which can limit concurrent write operations. It’s not suitable for high-concurrency scenarios. Network access: SQLite is designed for local storage and doesn’t provide network access out of the box. User management: SQLite doesn’t have built-in user management or access control features.ezstandalone.cmd.push(function () { ezstandalone.showAds(120); }); Scalability: While SQLite can handle databases up to 140 terabytes, it may not be the best choice for very large datasets or high-traffic applications. Alter table limitations: SQLite has limited support for ALTER TABLE operations compared to other database systems.
Llimitations are low concurrency (not an issue, unless I write from multiple applications/scripts to the same thing) local only/mostly, fine too user management, not an issue, just me scalability, not suited to large amounts. The premise is that I won't have lots of data ALTER TABLE limitations, this may mean rebulds/redesigns as things evolve?
Best Practices for Using SQLite on Mac
make regular backups with the .dump command (you can cron job this) optimize queries use right data types indexing rebuild often to reclaim unused space (VACUUM) command use prepared statements in my code
DB Browser for SQLite: A free, open-source tool that provides a user-friendly interface for creating, designing, and editing SQLite database files. TablePlus: A native macOS application that supports multiple database systems, including SQLite.ezstandalone.cmd.push(function () { ezstandalone.showAds(116); }); SQLite Studio: Another free, open-source option with a rich feature set for managing SQLite databases.
three Mac tools for interacting w sqlite thru GUI. DB Browser, TablePlus and SQLite Studio. TablePlus is a mac app, the other two FOSS tools.
Optimizing SQLite Performance
often used columns/tables can be indexed for better performance
JSON support:
sqlite can parse json for inputs.
FeatureSQLiteMySQLPostgreSQLServerServerlessClient-serverClient-serverSetupNo setup requiredRequires installationRequires installationConcurrencyLimitedHighHighData TypesDynamicStaticStaticMax Database Size140 TBNo limitNo limitBest ForLocal storage, PrototypesWeb apps, Large datasetsComplex queries, Big dataPerformanceFast for small datasetsFast for large datasetsFast for large datasetsPortabilityHighly portableLess portableLess portable
[[Martijn Aslander]]'s point was that all your personal data is in size limited to MBs, perhaps a handfull GBs. (He keeps out his documents and mail archives) Compared to table, a few 10s of GB should be doable and still be fast.
SQLite integrates seamlessly with Python. Here’s a simple script to interact with our database: import sqlite3 import pandas as pd # Connect to the database conn = sqlite3.connect('analytics.db') # Create a cursor cur = conn.cursor() # Execute a query cur.execute(""" SELECT pv.page_url, pv.view_count, COUNT(uv.id) as unique_visitors FROM page_views pv LEFT JOIN user_visits uv ON pv.id = uv.page_id GROUP BY pv.id ORDER BY pv.view_count DESC """) # Fetch all rows rows = cur.fetchall() # Create a pandas DataFrame df = pd.DataFrame(rows, columns=['Page URL', 'View Count', 'Unique Visitors']) print(df) # Close the connection conn.close()
sqlite integrates w python. what about php?
Let’s create a sample database file: sqlite3 analytics.db
making a new sqlite database is as easy as in terminal sqlite3 name.db
It supports terabyte-sized databases and gigabyte-sized strings and blobs.
sqlite can handle large volumes, up to 1TB
SQLite stores all of the data in a single file on the filesystem, which makes it easy to copy or backup the database.
sqlite is a single local file
What is sqlite. I've used mysql/php since forever. [[Martijn Aslander]] showed his personal information browser which is based on sqlite, and it was fast.
German gov assessment of password managers: only 1Password, Keepass2 Android, KeePassXC get full marks.
Science populism in medicine
A new type of science communicator has recently arisen - one that preys on and misleads scientifically curious audiences. We will identify and expose these influencers and their manipulative and corrosive rhetoric. These communicators are a product of the toxic waste of contemporary politics and broken online incentives leaking into science and are aligned - intentionally or unintentionally - with political projects that seek to undermine science. They are the science populists.
Science populists
Besluit dat data.overheid.nl aanwijst als centraal informatiepunt ihkv de DGA
Advies AP mbt Uitvoeringsbesluit datagovernanceverordening. Merkt op dat CBS bij het inzetten van de beveiligde verwerkingsomgeving een verwerker wordt, en een verwerkingsovereenkomst nodig zal zijn.
RvS heeft geen opmerkingen bij Uitvoeringsbesluit Datagovernanceverordening
Uitvoeringsbesluit Datagovernanceverordening Regelt bevoegde organen, en enkele elementen rondom vergoedingen. RvS en AP hebben advies uitgebracht.
Meta wants to charge for sharing links on Facebook, for business. 2 links for free each month
Hopefully this means all EU / MS public institutions will leave FB.
Range of downloads wrt the event organising by Adrian Segar
Do your conference programs contain sessions you belatedly discover were of little interest or value to most attendees? If so, you’re wasting significant stakeholder and attendee time and money — your conference is simply not as good as it could be. Now imagine you used event crowdsourcing to routinely create conference programs that reliably include the sessions and session content attendees actually want and need. How much value would that add to your event; for your attendees, your sponsors, and your bottom line? Event Crowdsourcing: Creating Meetings People Actually Want and Need will show you how to create conference programs that reliably become what your attendees want and need. The product of my 33 years of participant-driven conference program design experience, Event Crowdsourcing clearly explains everything you need to know to successfully integrate effective real-time event crowdsourcing into your meeting programs and sessions. The book clearly explains program and session crowdsourcing and how to use it to improve your events. It also includes a comprehensive set of crowdsourcing techniques and describes how to choose the right ones for your meetings. When you read it and apply what you learn, I guarantee your events will be better!
[[Event Crowdsourcing by Adrian Segar]] 2019
Smart presenters and meeting organizers are integrating experiential learning and peer connection into their events. This book tells you how to do it. Buy The Power of Participation to learn why it’s so important to incorporate participant action into every aspect of your event, what you need to know to create a meeting environment that supports and encourages participation, and when and how to use this extensive compendium of specific, detailed techniques to radically improve your sessions and meetings. The Power of Participation: Creating Conferences That Deliver Learning, Connection, Engagement, and Action Publisher: Adrian Segar Release date ebook and paperback book: June 2015 Page count: 322 ISBN:978-1511555982
[[The Power of Participation by Adrian Segar]] 2015
Conferences That Work: Creating Events That People Love (2009) condenses 30+ years of experience convening, designing, and facilitating hundreds of conferences into an information-packed step-by-step guide to a proven design for creating productive relevant conferences that people love
[[Conferences That Work by Adrian Segar]] 2009
Site by Adrian Segar, who design 'conferences that work' for 30 yrs. Wrote three books about it. Mentions he uses [[Open Space vergt strakke organisatie 20040125155100]] at times but not often. His calendar mentions #unconf a lot, and #barcamp style stuff.
Spionage muss nicht mehr (so) teuer sein Der Fund zeigt auch einen neuen Trend bei staatlicher Überwachung. Bisher setzten Staaten oft auf spezialisierte Spionagesoftware. Das bekannteste Beispiel ist die Anwendung Pegasus, mit der zum Beispiel das Umfeld des ermordeten Journalisten Jamal Khashoggi ausspioniert worden sein soll. Diese Art Software lauert auf Sicherheitslücken in Smartphone-Betriebssystemen wie Android und iOS und nutzt sie dann aus. Das geht auch aus der Ferne, zum Beispiel über Textnachrichten mit Schadcode. Doch diese Art von Spionagesoftware ist teuer. Deshalb nutzen Regime heute verstärkt die Möglichkeit, die ein physischer Zugriff auf das Gerät bietet. Soll heißen: Sie nehmen es an sich und spielen gezielt Spionagesoftware drauf. Zuletzt hatte die Nichtregierungsorganisation Amnesty International eine Spionagesoftware des serbischen Geheimdienstes enttarnt, mit der Journalistinnen und Aktivisten überwacht wurden. Sicherheitsforscher fanden ähnliche Ansätze russischer und chinesischer Behörden, die sowohl Oppositionelle als auch reisende Geschäftsleute überwachen. In allen Fällen hatten die Behörden Verhöre oder andere Gelegenheiten genutzt, um die Geräte zu manipulieren.
Not a 'new trend' just what was always done. Physical access to devices always preferred when it's targeted surveillance. Weird piece of journalism, makes me think that author is new to this topic. Same being said in comments btw
Eine Person wird vom belarussischen Geheimdienst KGB verhört und muss dabei ihr Handy abgeben. Am nächsten Tag meldet das Antivirensystem des Smartphones eine verdächtige App. Die Person löscht sie, aber ahnt nicht, dass sie eine weitere Spionage-App auf ihrem Gerät hat. Diese App hat Zugriff auf Mikrofon und Kamera; sie ermöglicht es, in verschlüsselten Messengern, SMS und E-Mails mitzulesen, Telefonate mitzuhören und aufzuzeichnen sowie den Standort zu überwachen. Man kann sogar das gesamte Smartphone aus der Ferne löschen, wenn man will. Die Kontrolle über diese App hat: der belarussische Geheimdienst.
Well duh. Anytime you need to release your device(s) to whatever authority it's compromised. Everywhere. The journalists in this case seem unaware of opsec need
Maakt het uit? Niet voor de overgang naar elektrisch rijden. In 2035 koopt niemand meer een brandstofauto. Maar de kans dat die nieuwe auto van een Chinese of Koreaanse fabrikant komt, is deze week wel toegenomen.
FD opinie Matthijs Bouman #2025/12/17. In 2035 koopt niemand meer benzine-auto's Chinese / Koreaanse modellen zullen de markt nemen. - [ ] welke Koreaanse en Chinese e-auto fabrikanten zijn er, en welke in NL op de markt? #pkm #30mins
Zo hopen de Duitsers iets langer te kunnen genieten van de investeringen die ze de afgelopen eeuw deden in de ontwikkeling en productie van de explosiemotor. Ze trappen met twee benen tegelijk in de verzonken-kosten-denkfout, de misvatting dat een beslissing in het heden moet afhangen van kosten die je in het verleden hebt gemaakt. Snel afschrijven op de ‘schone diesel’ en vol investeren in de elektrische auto doet te veel emotionele pijn.
Opinie in FD. De push v Duitse auto-industrie voor uitstel verbod nieuwe benzine auto's (nu we de 10 jaar grens bereiken, typisch) die beloond is door de EC deze week is een sunk cost fallacy.
Military transport by rail to get priority late next year. Dutch gov asking other MS for a 'military' Schengen to make transports to e.g. Poland easier.
Simpl programme website, on EC domain
'Polish Agriculture Data Space' by PSNC, using Gaia-X. mentions AD4GD and Datamite
Today, under the Polish Presidency of the Council of the European Union, EuroHPC JU inaugurated PIAST-Q in Poznań, Poland. This first inauguration of a EuroHPC quantum computer marks a milestone in building a European quantum computing infrastructure. This is also the first EuroHPC infrastructure located in Poland.
PSNC PIAST-Q is a EuroHPC quantum computer Inaugurated June 2025
onderzoeksrapport "Cyberweerbaarheid binnen gemeentegrenzen Uitwerking van het Bestuurlijk Convenant Digitale Veiligheid Gemeenten en het Rijk" Kamerbrief d.d. #2025/12/15, rapport is van #2025/08/09 onder verantw MinBZK
Downloaded Zotero: CYBERWEERBAARHEID BINNEN GEMEENTEGRENZEN in Zotero
Daarin staat uitgewerkt welke acties er vanuit het Rijk en de gemeenten op dit moment al lopen. Ook staat erin beschreven wat de inzet is voor de komende tijd.
Rapport geeft actielijst bestaande interventies. Doornemen
digitale veiligheid in 4 aandachtsgebieden voor gemeenten: de interne digitale veiligheid; ontwrichting binnen gemeentegrenzen als gevolg van een cyberincident; cybercrime en gedigitaliseerde criminaliteit; online aangejaagde openbare-ordeverstoringen.
Vraagstukken gegroepeerd in deze 4 clusters. Waar zou hybride aanval tbv staatsactor vallen? Cluster 1?
digitale incidenten zich anders ontwikkelen dan fysieke incidenten. Het gaat sneller, grensoverschrijdend en is minder zichtbaar.
duh. Cyberincidenten zijn haast per def internationaal, moet je actief op alert. Je kunt niet wachten tot gevolgen zichtbaar zijn. Dreiging ontwikkelt zich veel sneller dan zichtbaarheid
schetst een beeld van de uitdagingen voor gemeenten op gebied van digitale veiligheid. En laat zien hoe verantwoordelijkheden en rollen binnen gemeenten zijn verdeeld.
focus op cybersec, en hoe rollen en responsibilities verdeeld zijn
Dit rapport is samen met een brief aan de Tweede Kamer aangeboden
Naar TK gestuurd
onderzoeksrapport gemeenten 'cyberlandschap'
waadi check tool
Effort and intent are 'deliverables' in relationships, not the mere result. Here: a generated bed time story, automated gift giving etc.
Terence Eden stopped buying at Amazon like me. Points to a Kobo price guarantee so he wants to automate price comparisons with Amazon (usually cheapest). And then buy and request the return of the difference.
Step 2. Post the status Make a POST call to: https://[YOUR MASTODON SERVER]/api/v1/statuses?access_token=[YOUR ACCESS TOKEN] Set the type to application/x-www-form-urlencoded and pass the status field containing your status message. If you are attaching an image as well, pass the media_ids[] field with the media id you retrieved in the previous step. More info: Documentation for the /statuses endpoint on Mastodon.
URL form for a POST call to my Mastodon endpoints. Form submission with just status is enough. Repurpose jsonclassic.php for it.
creating app and setting access token for masto account (wrt posting from feedreader)
If you need to ship outside the EU, we can help—just get in touch with us before placing your order so we can provide options and shipping instructions tailored to your destination.
Caspar has a EU focus.
Caspar printing on demand for textiles. Based in Croatia. Also for single prints or small runs.
EU asset freeze extended
Josh Waitzkin’s explanation in The Art of Learning about how to start learning chess
The Art of Learning by Josh Waitzkin, wrt learning chess.
Your research interest should be genuine. It’s a mistake to choose something you think is “safe” to fail at. It may seem rational to experiment with something where failure has no serious consequences (e.g., having to start over). But this only leads to a lack of motivation to build the intensity and seriousness needed for thorough work. If the content of your Zettelkasten isn’t important to you and only serves to learn the Zettelkasten method, you’ll quickly become superficial and sloppy with the content. The Zettelkasten method requires serious engagement with the content – it cannot be learned with dummy content.
Bad advice. Safe to fail probes are not 'unserious', bc of aiming to limit the downside should they fail. The point is having the probe to explore 'cheaply' within the actual context of work. First part, the interest should be genuine, is completely true. It does not mean you can't do risk containment though. Probes are real and safe simultaneously. [[Probe proberend handelen 20201111162752]]
Het hernieuwde convenant geldt voor de periode 2024-2027. Er zijn in totaal acht Kennis- en innovatieagenda’s (KIA’s) binnen de KIC opgesteld, waaronder de KIA Digitalisering. Digital Holland is coördinator van de KIA Digitalisering.
Binnen het innovatieconvenant van Rijk et al, 2024-2027, zijn er 8 Kennis Innovatie Agenda's KIA. Digitalisering is er 1, en DigitalHolland is er coord van. Dwz: Vu deze KIA is de SIDN call te bezien.
Over Digital Holland Digital Holland (voorheen Topsector ICT) identificeert, prioriteert en organiseert ICT-onderzoek en innovatie door publieke en private partijen bijeen te brengen met focus op digitale sleuteltechnologieën en maatschappelijke uitdagingen. Hierbij bestrijkt Digital Holland het traject van fundamenteel onderzoek tot en met valorisatie. Opleiden van nieuw talent, om- en bijscholing, kennis-disseminatie, breed betrekken van mkb en internationale samenwerking vormen een belangrijk onderdeel van de missie.
Digital Holland is voorheen TopsectorICT. Onhandige naam.
Bijvoorbeeld omdat ze zijn uitgegeven onder een opensource-licentie, gebruik maken van open standaarden, van dataspaces Link opent in een nieuwe browsertab-technologie (gericht op het delen van data in een beschermde op publieke waarden gebaseerde context) of gebaseerd zijn op decentrale, federatieve modellen.
Links to data spaces on Wikipedia: note that that link talks about data spaces as tech only, not in the sense of the EU single market for data, which is a much more meaningful context when it comes to (design)values.
We zoeken daarom onderzoeksprojecten waarin bestaande (Europese, dan wel Nederlandse) alternatieven getest en onderzocht worden en/of doorontwikkeld in een specifieke context.
research into alternatives: testing / development
SIDN new call on digital autonomy. Icw a knowledge institute. Max size 200k. Deadline #2026/02/23
Simpl annual event on Jan 29th. Brussel
https://code.europa.eu/users/sign_up European Union institutes gitlab instance
Article 6
deleted
Article 17
deleted
By 15 May 2014 and every six years thereafter the Commissionshall present to the European Parliament and to the Council areport on the implementation of this Directive based, inter alia,on reports from Member States in accordance with Article 21(2)and (3).Where necessary, the report shall be accompanied by proposalsfor Community action
replaced, by a one time(!) eval after 6 years.
Article 26
same, Art 4 of proposal
Article 25
superseded w similar provision. 1 March 2027 fully applicable.
Article 24
superseded by Art 2 of the new proposal, similar provisions
Article 21
deleted
Article 22
replaced with new 22a and 22b
Article 16
deleted
Article 15
deleted
Article 14
deleted
By way of derogation from Article 11(1), Member States maylimit public access to spatial data sets and services through theservices referred to in points (b) to (e) of Article 11(1), or to thee-commerce services referred to in Article 14(3), where suchaccess would adversely affect any of the following
changed to Member States may limit public access to spatial data sets and services where such access could adversly affect any of the following:
By way of derogation from Article 11(1), Member Statesmay limit public access to spatial data sets and services throughthe services referred to in point (a) of Article 11(1) where suchaccess would adversely affect international relations, publicsecurity or national defence
changed to Member States may limit public access to spatial data sets and services where such access could adversely affect international relations, public security or national defence
Article 11
deleted
Article 12
deleted
Article 10
deleted
Article 9
deleted
Article 8
deleted
Article 7
deleted
Rules for the implementation of this Article shall be adoptedby 15 May 2008 in accordance with the regulatory procedurereferred to in Article 22(2). These rules shall take account ofrelevant, existing international standards and user requirements,in particular with relation to validation metadata
Replaced by 4. The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts laying down rules for the application of this Article, taking account of relevant, existing international standards and user requirements, in particular with relation to validation metadata. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 22b(2)’
a third party to whom the network has been madeavailable in accordance with Article 12
deleted
‘third party’ means any natural or legal person other than apublic authority
deleted
‘Inspire geo-portal’ means an Internet site, or equivalent,providing access to the services referred to in Article 11(1)
deleted
the conformity of spatial data sets with the implementingrules provided for in Article 7(1)
deleted
The description of the existing data themes referred to inAnnexes I, II and III may be adapted in accordance with theregulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 22(3), inorder to take into account the evolving needs for spatial data insupport of Community policies that affect the environment.25.4.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 108/5
Replaced by The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22a in order to amend Annexes I, II and III by adapting the description of the existing data themes in the light of technological and economic developments
In the case of spatial data sets which comply with thecondition set out in paragraph 1(c), but in respect of which athird party holds intellectual property rights, the public authoritymay take action under this Directive only with the consent ofthat third party.
deleted
‘interoperability’ means the possibility for spatial data setsto be combined, and for services to interact, withoutrepetitive manual intervention, in such a way that the resultis coherent and the added value of the data sets and servicesis enhanced
deleted
‘spatial object’ means an abstract representation of a real-world phenomenon related to a specific location orgeographical area
deleted
Article 17 of Directive 2007/2/EC requires Member States to adopt measures thatmake it possible for spatial data collected at one level of public authority to be sharedbetween all the different levels of public authorities and to ensure that spatial data andservices are made available under conditions that do not restrict their extensive use.Pursuant to Directive (EU) 2019/1024, data is open-by-default which also applies tospatial data, including spatial datasets falling within the scope of Directive 2007/2/EC.Article 17 should therefore be deleted for the purpose of simplifying the legalframework and avoiding overlapping rules
this again mixes use and re-use as interchangeable. Not all spatial data is actually open by default, so we get some return to pre-2007. Who will notice when govs stop providing access?
dapting thedescription of the existing data themes. It is of particular importance that theCommission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, includingat expert level, in accordance with the principles laid down in the InterinstitutionalAgreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making. In particular, to ensure equalparticipation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and theCouncil receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and theirexperts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealingwith the preparation of delegated acts.
themes to be redefined?
33 out of the 34 spatial datasets
themes again, not data sets. And is it really 33 of 34 themes. Not all themes fully.
Article 14 of Directive 2007/2/EC sets out the rules for making discovery and viewservices available to the public free of charge, as well as for making e-commerceservices available where charges are levied. Directive (EU) 2019/1024 establishesprinciples and rules governing charging for making documents and high-value datasetsavailable free of charge, including exceptions and derogations from the rules oncharging, for the purpose of ensuring the maximum impact and to facilitate re-use ofdata. Pursuant to Article 1(7) of Directive (EU) 2019/1024, that Directive sets out thatthe Directive governs the re-use of existing documents held by public sector bodiesand public undertakings of the Member States, including documents to whichDirective 2007/2/EC applies. To ensure consistency with Directive (EU) 2019/1024and to avoid overlapping provisions, the rules on charging for discovery and viewservices in Directive 2007/2/EC should be deleted
INSPIRE charging provisions replace by ODD charging provisions (and those are imo potentially eroded in the digital omnibus)
Pursuant to Article 1(7) of Directive (EU) 2019/1024, that Directive governs the re-use of existing documents held by public sector bodies and public undertakings of theMember States, including documents to which Directive 2007/2/EC applies. Since theinteroperability requirements for open data apply to spatial data, the empowerment toadopt implementing rules laying down technical arrangements for the interoperabilityand, where practicable, harmonisation of spatial data sets and related provisionsshould be deleted
Wrt standards this makes usage (g2g) the same as re-use (INSPIRE was not only for re-use imo) but not explicitly?
contains reference to third parties, whereas Directive (EU)2019/1024, which applies to public sector bodies and public undertakings, does notextend to private entities or businesses. To ensure coherence with the Directive (EU)2019/102439, the reference to third parties should be deleted
non psbs / third parties removed from scope INSPIRE.
Remove four empowerments for adoption of implementing rules for interoperability,network services, data sharing and reporting requirements that no longer reflectcurrent best practices or standards, thereby removing rigid technical requirements.The four implementing acts adopted on the basis of the empowerments will berepealed by separate adoption procedure (comitology)
agreed wrt rigid tech reqs. Stil, I wonder if HVD doesn't actually build on them
As a consequence of the amendments set out above in relation to network services,interoperability and data sharing, it is furthermore proposed to repeal the following relatedimplementing acts, by way of the applicable procedure, and to delete the correspondingempowerments:(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 976/2009 as regards Network Services21(2) Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 on interoperability of spatial data setsand services22, and(3) Commission Regulation (EU) No 268/2010 on data and service sharing23.(4) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1372 implementing Directive2007/2/EC as regards monitoring and reporting24.
I read this as taking out all INSPIRE obligations, whereas the HVD reg builds on these pre-existing obligations. (Stating that sharing data / services must be open)- [ ] Crosscheck if HVD states an explicit independent mandate, without reference to INSPIRE mandates. #geonovumtb #10mins #belangrijkeerst
Directive (EU) 2019/1024 sets out that data is open-by-default which also applies to spatialdat
This seems odd, ODD does not constitute an obligation for sharing (HVD does), just mandates conditions when sharing is done.
With a view to reducing administrative burden, it is proposed to delete the reportingrequirements set out in Article 21. Member States shall provide the Commission with a reporton the measures taken to implement Implementing Regulation No (EU) 2023/138
reporting obligation folded into HVD reporting (already combined in practice per 2026)
33 out of 34 INSPIRE datasets
This is a wrong formulation. it covers INSPIRE themes not data sets.
The proposal is a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amendingDirective 2007/2/EC
Remains a Directive that amends INSPIRE directive. While ODD / HVD are regulations.
he proposed measures to simplify the INSPIRE Directive are consistent with Directive (EU)2019/1024 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/138
ODD and HVD
It is thereforealso proposed to delete the obligation on the Commission to operate the Inspire geo-portal
as announced, the inspire portal will move into the eu data portal. Has consequences for the HVD monitoring (now part of inspire portal) too and shifts resp from #jrc to #eupb
widely recognised Minimum InteroperabilityMechanisms (MIMs) developed by the Open & Agile Smart Cities community1
FIWARE. These MIMS are hardly usable though.
proposed simplification will create flexibility in the implementation allowing for the adoptionof community good practices
a yes then.
proposal is consistent with Regulation(EU) 2024/903
Interoperable Europe Act. I wonder. Are we going to see INSPIRE components adopted as interoperability solutions by the interoperability board? INSPIRE is not just a gov thing either.
With the proposed deletion of detailed technical requirements forinteroperability, network services and data sharing
strikes harmonisation, deletes the rabbithole.
The application of the INSPIRE Directive is not only relevant for environmental policy.Several pieces of EU legislation refer to the INSPIRE Directive, such as Regulation (EU)2018/841 of the European Parliament and of the Council13 (LULUCF), Regulation (EU)2021/2116 of the European Parliament and the Council14 (Common agricultural policy),Regulation (EU) 2018/109115 (integrated farm statistics), Regulation (EU) 2021/696 of theEuropean Parliament and of the Council16 (Union Space Programme), Directive (EU)2024/2881 of the European Parliament and of the Council17 (Air Quality Directive), andRegulation (EU) 2024/1991 of the European Parliament and of the Council (NatureRestoration Regulation)18,
List of regs where INSPIRE is referred to
Regulation (EU) 2019/1010
on the alignment of reporting obligations in the field of legislation related to the environment
ot otherwise affected by the Digital Omnibusproposal, because the Commission did not propose relevant substantive changes to thesolutions set out in the Open Data Directive
although definitions will shift in the omnibus and that carries uncertain effects.
Notably, the high-value datasets defined under that framework wereselected to match the data sets already covered by the INSPIRE Directive
only partly true. Not all INSPIRE themes covered in HVD, and not all themes covered are fully covered (e.g. transport networks is limited to inland waterways).
Itwill be supported by non-legislative actions and practical tools to support smart and efficientreuse of environmental data across the Union
Ask #dgenv #jrc about foreseen support actions and tools
n addition, the EU’s objective of creating Common European Data Spaces set out in the 2020European strategy for data, includes a dedicated Green Deal Data Space to support theEuropean Green Deal; this requires breaking data silos and ensuring that all relevantenvironmental data – spatial and non-spatial – can flow freely to inform EU environmentaland climate objectives and reduce administrative burden on companies and publicadministrations.
Tied to GDDS
Horizontal EU data legislation regulates the access to, reuse, interoperability, and governanceof public sector data in a coherent and technologically advanced manner. This includesDirective (EU) 2019/1024 (Open Data Directive)7 and Implementing Regulation (EU)2023/138 (High-Value Datasets)8, Regulation (EU) 2022/868 (Data Governance Act)9, andRegulation (EU) 2024/903 (Interoperable Europe Act)10. Horizontal EU data legislationintroduces open-by-default principles, structured metadata, mandatory ApplicationProgramming Interfaces (APIs) and where relevant as bulk download formats for high-valuedatasets, as well as a streamlined, common governance model for cross-border data us
Tied to DA (incl DGA,ODD), HVD, and Interoperable Europe Act here. Note: #dgdigit assumes no connection w Interop act until its review.
‘GreenData4All’
this proposal is fulfilling the announced greendata4all initiative.
reserving the Directive’s objectives of ensuring the accessibility,quality and interoperability of environmental spatial data
interoperability impacted how by removing harmonisation?
This proposal seeks to modernise and simplify the INSPIRE Directive by removing technicalrequirements for data and data sharing and aligning its obligations with more recent horizontalEU datal legislation.
removes tech reqs --> harmonisation?
connect to horizontal legislation --> ODD(DA) / HVD
Download page for the environmental omnibus d.d. #2025/12/10
Today's simplification package is composed of six legislative proposals.
6 legislative proposals (but press release lists 5)
The current technical requirements for geospatial data under the INSPIRE Directive will be fully aligned with the horizontal legislation governing public sector high value geospatial data. This simplification will lower compliance costs for public authorities and facilitate access to high value geospatial data sets for all public and private users.
INSPIRE to be aligned with HVD (as expected)
EC press release for the environmental omnibus
https://web.archive.org/web/20251210080852/https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-66634-7
Cool! Hotmixing turns out to be the secret behind the durable Roman 'concrete'. A 2023 theory now confirmed by a Pompei construction site find.
Researchers think this new insight may be applied in current building, and impact the climate footprint of modern day concrete.
An unfinished Pompeian construction site reveals ancient Roman building technology in Zotero
Jolla announced a new phone, finished in SF, with Linux and Android compatible. Pre-ordered it (99Euro downpayment) How to compare w FP / Murena?
Jolla Mind2 runs venho.ai. Unclear if this product actually ships at the moment. 'backorder' which means 8 week delay. Originally Oct 25, so end of year
venho.ai, Finnish, only to be available in EU/EFTA desk top based AI. There's a 600 Euro Jolla device that runs it that can be ordered. Comes with a subscription it seems, and has cloud connection, but it seems not for the AI stuff / data.
On 24 November 2023, the EU and Canada launched a Digital Partnership to reinforce cooperation on digital issues. The partnership reflects a shared vision for a positive and human-centric digital economy and society. The EU and Canada agreed to work together in crucial areas such as AI, secure international connectivity, cyber security, online platforms, digital identity and digital skills. This Digital Partnership and its importance were highlighted in the New EU-Canada Strategic Partnership of the Future, adopted at the Canada-EU Summit on 23 June 2025.
Digital Partnership started in 2023. June 2025 incorporated in strategic partnership. Now a first physical meeting at high level.
EU and Canada are committed to working together on secure international connectivity, for example in 5G and subsea cables, and have agreed to explore new cable routes to strengthen global network resilience, including in the Arctic region. The EU and Canada will deepen the collaboration in priority topics such as quantum technologies, semiconductors, and high-performance computing. They also reaffirmed their commitment to resilient semiconductor supply chains and secure and sovereign cloud infrastructure and data centres.
Covering deeper layers of the stack. So it's a digital sovereignty / autonomy pact.
explore cooperation on enhancing information integrity online, including on the challenges posed by generative AI and the risks stemming from foreign information manipulation and interference.
DSA aspects
Both partners plan to establish a forum to facilitate joint testing of digital credential technologies, drive pilot projects, and share information. They will develop joint use cases and pilot projects towards interoperability of digital identity wallets and digital credentials and trust services.
joint testing facility for wallets / data connectors
the cooperation on digital credentials and trust services, including on technical interoperability and solutions based on digital identity wallets, the EU and Canada signed a Memorandum of Understanding on Digital Credentials and Trust Services.
Relevant to EU wallett efforts and to trusted data transactions. This is a 2nd MoU
the partners will share best practices to accelerate AI adoption in strategic sectors such as healthcare, manufacturing, energy, culture, science and public services, and support SMEs. They committed to work together on large AI infrastructures and support industry and academia's access to AI compute capacity. They will also explore scientific cooperation on fundamental AI research, and the development of advanced AI models for the public good, including in areas such as extreme weather monitoring and climate change. In addition, the EU and Canada will set up a structured dialogue on data spaces, of particular relevance to the development of large AI models.
Elements in the MoU: - share good practices to support adoption - collab on large AI infrastructure (Apply AI strat EU, HPC network) - collab on access to HPC (in line w AI factories in EU) - explore coop in fundamental ai research (weak) - development of AI for public good (in line w EU AI goals) - structured dialogue on data spaces (as data source for AI models) Only the last one is not immediately obviously connected to existing EU efforts and actions.
Memorandum of Understanding on Artificial Intelligence.
Canada and EU signed a MoU wrt AI.
the first Digital Partnership Council held today in Montreal, Canada
Canada and EU have a shared Digital Partnership Council. First meeting #2025/12/08
link.europa.eu/HndTw4
nice, europa.eu uses its own URL shortener. high time too.
Next Generation EIF: official kick‑off with Member States The Chair of the independent expert group on next generation EIF, Emilija Stojmenova Duh, presented its recommendations for an EIF blueprint, which will feed into the future EIF revision and proposal by the Board.
EIF proposal presented. Decision q1 2026?
The labelled solutions are: Core Vocabularies – common semantic building blocks that help public administrations describe key concepts (such as persons, organisations or locations) in a consistent way across borders and sectors. DCAT-AP – a common specification that makes data catalogues interoperable and helps make public sector data easier to discover and reuse.
Two things labeled as interoperability solutions now. DCAT-AP and core vocabs. Odd as they're not 'solutions' but DCAT-AP is a standard. Risk of board repeating existing standardisation efforts?
Interoperable Europe Board meeting #2025/12/04
Companies will not be obliged to use the European Business Wallets. The Regulation places obligations solely on public sector bodies to accept its core functions, while companies remain free to decide whether to adopt the wallets for their commercial operations or interactions with public authorities
wallets are voluntary, but PSBs must accept them. Asymmetry may impact adoption? ('costly to prepare but noone uses them')
In parallel, the Commission will work closely with Member States and the private sector to define the technical standards and requirements for European Business Wallets through ongoing efforts under the European Digital Identity Framework and in large-scale pilot projects funded under the Digital Europe Programme such as the WeBuild consortium.
technical standards and reqs not yet defined.
It is estimated that simplification efforts will save up to €5 billion in administrative costs between now and 2029. Moreover, the European Business Wallets should unlock at least EUR 160 billion in savings for businesses each year.
Savings projects between 2025 and 2029, odd bc it is only now in proposal. May well be 2027 before law is there, implementation another 2 yrs, so no real change until 2029/2030?
The technical architecture and features for the European Business Wallets will build on the one for the EU Digital Identity Wallets.
Business wallets will build on existing personal wallets tech and infra. What about existing entity identifiers (Digidentity e.g.)?
Designed to be accessible for businesses of all sizes, including SMEs and microenterprises, as well as public administrations
EU wallets for all types of orgs. SME's / micro entities and PSBs, are 99% of all EU entities.
The European Business Wallets are one of the key deliverables of the Digital Package. The Commission proposes a regulation to establish those Wallets as a harmonised digital solution to ease the administrative burden and to enable companies and public sector bodies to identify, to authenticate and to exchange data in a secure and user-friendly way, with full legal effect across the European Union.
EU Business Wallets proposed as regulation in the 2025 work programma. So in first step of legislative process.
EU digital Business Wallets
EU Parl report on technological sovereignty and digital infra.
Press release EU Parl wrt tech sovereignty report
ETSI membership tiers and fees. Unlike CEN & CENELEC which has a route along National standardisation bodies.
this type of thing sounds like what I thought wrt annotation of [[AI agents als virtueel team]]. The example prompts of questions make me think of [[Filosofische stromingen als gereedschap 20030212105451]] die al per stroming een vraagstramien bevat. Making persona's of diff thinking styles, lines of questioning. Idem for reviews, or starting a project etc.
For browsers on mobile devices (including iPads) To install the Hypothesis Bookmarklet you’ll make a bookmark in your mobile browser out of any page, and then edit the bookmark, replacing the URL with some javascript we specify below. To install the Bookmarklet
this, suggested by the team should work.
Use the “Paste a Link” service
Via proxy deprecated by Feb 2026
Our code to run Via remains open source; we welcome others who want to run the service on their own domains
The Via proxy service can be run on ones own domain as it is open source.
The hypothes.is Via proxy is being closed by Feb 2026. So the option I found to annotate on mobile using 'Share' to Via won't work anymore.
I have typically added via.hypothes.is to the URLs of articles manually so I can use Hypothes.is on my phone.
@chrisaldrich uses the Via proxy on mobile. Or did back in 2020. This will be deprecated by Feb 2026 however.