Die Redaktion von Nature verurteilt die Angriffe der Trump-Regierung auf die Wissenschaft und fordert die internationale wissenschaftliche Community auf die bedrohte US-Wissenschaft zu unterstützen. Die US-Regierung arbeite an der Zerstörung der bisher führenden Rolle der amerikanischen wissenschaftlichen Institutionen. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00562-w
31 Matching Annotations
- Mar 2025
-
www.nature.com www.nature.com
Tags
- Trump administration
- process: cancellation of policies and initiatives in diversity, equity and inclusion
- 2025-02-25
- War on Science
- Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
- USA
- event: withdrawal from Paris agreement January 2025
- process: cancellation of federal funding for international climate change projects
Annotators
URL
-
- Nov 2024
- Apr 2022
-
www.facetsjournal.com www.facetsjournal.com
-
Caulfield, T., Bubela, T., Kimmelman, J., & Ravitsky, V. (2021). Let’s do better: Public representations of COVID-19 science. FACETS, 6, 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2021-0018
-
- Jan 2022
-
www.theatlantic.com www.theatlantic.com
-
Along these lines, the world would benefit from an organized effort to understand how we should identify and train brilliant young people, how the most effective small groups exchange and share ideas, which incentives should exist for all sorts of participants in innovative ecosystems (including scientists, entrepreneurs, managers, and engineers), how much different organizations differ in productivity (and the drivers of those differences), how scientists should be selected and funded, and many other related issues besides.
These are usually incredibly political questions that aren't always done logically.
See for example Malcolm Gladwell's podcast episode My Little Hundred Million.
-
-
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
-
Banerjee, A. (2022, January 12). I’m leading a long Covid trial – it’s clear Britain has underestimated its impact. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jan/12/long-covid-trial-britain-short-term-virus
-
-
www.thelancet.com www.thelancet.com
-
Galvão-Castro, B., Cordeiro, R. S. B., & Goldenberg, S. (2022). Brazilian science under continuous attack. The Lancet, 399(10319), 23–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02727-6
-
- Dec 2021
-
www.nature.com www.nature.com
-
Replicating scientific results is tough—But essential. (2021). Nature, 600(7889), 359–360. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-03736-4
-
- Nov 2021
-
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
-
Kale, S. (2021, November 11). Chakras, crystals and conspiracy theories: How the wellness industry turned its back on Covid science. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/11/injecting-poison-will-never-make-you-healthy-how-the-wellness-industry-turned-its-back-on-covid-science
-
- Jul 2021
-
-
Holmes, N. P. (2021). I critiqued my past papers on social media—Here’s what I learnt. Nature, 595(7867), 333–333. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01879-y
-
-
blogs.sciencemag.org blogs.sciencemag.org
-
Building trust in science requires more than just funding | Editor’s Blog. (n.d.). Retrieved July 2, 2021, from https://blogs.sciencemag.org/editors-blog/2021/03/04/building-trust-in-science-requires-more-than-just-funding
-
- Apr 2021
-
leonidtiokhin.medium.com leonidtiokhin.medium.com
-
Tiokhin, L. (2021, April 21). Why indirect contributions matter for science and scientists. Medium. https://leonidtiokhin.medium.com/why-indirect-contributions-matter-for-science-and-scientists-6c9bf827bc7d
-
- Mar 2021
-
www.nature.com www.nature.com
-
Knowles, R., Mateen, B. A., & Yehudi, Y. (2021). We need to talk about the lack of investment in digital research infrastructure. Nature Computational Science, 1(3), 169–171. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-021-00048-5
-
-
www.theatlantic.com www.theatlantic.com
-
Yong, S. by E. (n.d.). How Science Beat the Virus. The Atlantic. Retrieved 20 February 2021, from https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2021/01/science-covid-19-manhattan-project/617262/
-
-
www.nature.com www.nature.com
-
Cahill, B., & Masia, M. (2020). Four ways to fight science-funding cuts across Europe. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03121-7
-
-
www.google.co.uk www.google.co.uk
-
Greene, G. (1999). The Woman who Knew Too Much: Alice Stewart and the Secrets of Radiation. University of Michigan Press.
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
ReconfigBehSci on Twitter: ‘RT @AdamJKucharski: Alice Stewart on epidemiology (from: Https://t.co/mt3pAwCLXP) https://t.co/P5oI6k4HjG’ / Twitter. (n.d.). Retrieved 2 March 2021, from https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1341017627746050049
-
- Feb 2021
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Dr Elaine Toomey on Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved 24 February 2021, from https://twitter.com/ElaineToomey1/status/1357343820417933316
-
- Jan 2021
-
troynikov.io troynikov.io
-
Ways will be found to make communities sustainable,
Ways will also be found to legibilize the deliberately inscrutable. With biomed funding so centralized, forces can be applied to increase the adoption of practices like data sharing and open science.
-
- Oct 2020
-
bylinetimes.com bylinetimes.com
-
Times info@bylinetimes.com (https://bylinetimes.com/), B. (2020, October 9). Climate Science Denial Network Behind Great Barrington Declaration. Byline Times. https://bylinetimes.com/2020/10/09/climate-science-denial-network-behind-great-barrington-declaration/
-
- Sep 2020
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
SAYAS Webinar 2: What Science will look like after COVID-19? (2020, July 23). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LA8zwwVpKJ8&feature=emb_logo
-
- Jun 2020
-
www.buzzfeednews.com www.buzzfeednews.com
-
Lee, S. M. (2020, May 15) JetBlue’s Founder Helped Fund A Stanford Study That Said The Coronavirus Wasn’t That Deadly. BuzzFeed News. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/stephaniemlee/stanford-coronavirus-neeleman-ioannidis-whistleblower
-
- May 2020
-
anr.fr anr.fr
-
Call for proposals details. (n.d.). Agence Nationale de La Recherche. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://anr.fr/en/call-for-proposals-details/call/flash-call-covid-19/
-
-
www.theatlantic.com www.theatlantic.com
-
Taber, S. (2019, September 18). The Problem With Sugar-Daddy Science. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/09/problem-sugar-daddy-science/598231/
-
-
featuredcontent.psychonomic.org featuredcontent.psychonomic.org
-
Mickes, L. (2020, March 31). COVID-19: What can we do now? Psychonomic Society Featured Content. https://featuredcontent.psychonomic.org/covid-19-what-can-we-do-now/
-
- Apr 2020
-
www.canada.ca www.canada.ca
-
Government of Canada. (2020). Government of Canada funds 49 additional COVID-19 research projects – Details of the funded projects. Canada.ca. https://www.canada.ca/en/institutes-health-research/news/2020/03/government-of-canada-funds-49-additional-covid-19-research-projects-details-of-the-funded-projects.html
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
ReconfigBehSci en Twitter: “‘Proper science without the drag’ – Move to the medical model of journal review: ‘Yes/No’ decision. We suggest the temporary adoption of this model for crisis-relevant material by journals. [happening already, but potentially even better models: @Meta_psy and @F1000Research?]” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://twitter.com/scibeh/status/1242094075312046082
-
-
sciencebusiness.net sciencebusiness.net
-
Science|Business Database: Coronavirus Funding Opportunities. (n.d.). Science|Business. Retrieved April 20, 2020, from https://sciencebusiness.net/sciencebusiness-database-coronavirus-funding-opportunities
-
- Jun 2016
-
Local file Local file
-
In some domains, path-breaking work is nec-essarily the outcome of collaborative activity rather thanindividualistic scholarship, a fact reflected in the modestproportion of federal research funds which is allocated toindividual investigators rather than teams. Collaborationsare a necessary feature of much, though by no means all,contemporary scientific research.
in some domains, collaboration is necessary. Hence the preference for team grants
-
- Apr 2016
-
Local file Local filetitle1
-
. Referees ofgrant proposals agree much more about what is unworthy of support than about what does have scientific value. In
Grant referees are better at agreeing on inadequate work than adequate
-
-
deevybee.blogspot.com deevybee.blogspot.com
-
A system that assumes a "quite good" institution is unable to get better, and thus denies them the funds that would enable them to get better, is probably not an optimal system for promoting merit. A system that rewards in proportion to merit would at least be able to recognise and reflect the dynamism of university research; research groups wax and wane as people come, go, get disheartened, get re-invigorated.
On the importance of funding middle-ground
-
it could be argued that we don’t just need an elite: we need a reasonable number of institutions in which there is a strong research environment, where more senior researchers feel valued and their graduate students and postdocs are encouraged to aim high. Our best strategy for retaining international competitiveness might be by fostering those who are doing well but have potential to do even better
capacity requires top and middle.
-