The industry average time to detect a supply chain breach is 267 days. SolarWinds went undetected for 14 months. XZ Utils took two years to surface. Socket, an a16z portfolio company, detected the malicious dependency in the Axios attack within 6 minutes of its publication.
检测时间的巨大差异（267天与6分钟）展示了安全检测领域的革命性变化。传统方法依赖已知漏洞数据库，而新型行为分析系统能够在攻击发生时立即检测到异常行为，这种能力差异决定了安全事件的严重程度。
A deliberately planted backdoor doesn’t have a CVE.
戳中了传统安全工具的阿喀琉斯之踵。基于已知漏洞（CVE）的防御逻辑在应对蓄意植入且会自毁的新型后门时形同虚设。这启示我们，静态的特征匹配已无法应对动态的攻击手段，必须转向对代码运行时行为的动态分析，从“它是什么”转向“它做了什么”。
Rothmund, T., Farkhari, F., Azevedo, F., & Ziemer, C.-T. (2020). Scientific Trust, Risk Assessment, and Conspiracy Beliefs about COVID-19—Four Patterns of Consensus and Disagreement between Scientific Experts and the German Public. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4nzuy
Petersen, M. B., Rasmussen, M. S., Lindholt, M. F., & Jørgensen, F. J. (2021). Pandemic Fatigue and Populism: The Development of Pandemic Fatigue during the COVID-19 Pandemic and How It Fuels Political Discontent across Eight Western Democracies. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/y6wm4
Nehal, K. R., Steendam, L. M., Campos Ponce, M., van der Hoeven, M., & Smit, G. S. A. (2021). Worldwide Vaccination Willingness for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vaccines, 9(10), 1071. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9101071
Bansal, B. (2021). Rapid COVID-19 Test: Investigating the Willingness to Take a Rapid Test Based on Multiple Factors. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/j3t76
Kovacs, M., Hoekstra, R., & Aczel, B. (2021). The Role of Human Fallibility in Psychological Research: A Survey of Mistakes in Data Management. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(4), 25152459211045930. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211045930
Gligorić, Vukašin, Allard Feddes, and Bertjan Doosje. ‘Political Bullshit Receptivity and Its Correlates: A Cross-Cultural Validation of the Concept’. PsyArXiv, 27 October 2020. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u9pe3.
Krupenkin, Masha, Kai Zhu, Dylan Walker, and David M. Rothschild. ‘If a Tree Falls in the Forest: COVID-19, Media Choices, and Presidential Agenda Setting’. SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 22 September 2020. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3697069.
Sanders, J., Tosi, A., Obradović, S., Miligi, I., & Delaney, L. (2021). Lessons from lockdown: Media discourse on the role of behavioural science in the UK COVID-19 response. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dw85a
Tomfohr-Madsen, L., Giesbrecht, G., Lebel, C., Racine, N., & Madigan, S. (2021). Depression and Anxiety in Pregnancy during COVID-19: A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/n8b7x
Fischer, R., & Karl, J. (2020). Predicting behavioral intentions to prevent or mitigate COVID-19: A meta-analysis. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ek69g
Karwowski, M., Zielinska, A., Jankowska, D., Strutynska, E., Omelanczuk, I., & Lebuda, I. (2020). Creative Lockdown? A Daily Diary Study of Creative Activity During Pandemics. 10.31234/osf.io/kvesm
Schnuerch, M., Nadarevic, L., & Rouder, J. (2020). The truth revisited: Bayesian analysis of individual differences in the truth effect [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/nfm6k
Embracing the slowdown. (n.d.). Retrieved August 30, 2020, from https://marketing.twitter.com/emea/en_gb/insights/embracing-the-slowdown
Moreau, D., & Gamble, B. (2020). Conducting a Meta-Analysis in the Age of Open Science: Tools, Tips, and Practical Recommendations [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t5dwg
Shahal, S., Wurzberg, A., Sibony, I., Duadi, H., Shniderman, E., Weymouth, D., Davidson, N., & Fridman, M. (2020). Synchronization of complex human networks. Nature Communications, 11(1), 3854. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17540-7
Speelman, C., & McGann, M. (2020). Statements about the Pervasiveness of Behaviour Require Data about the Pervasiveness of Behaviour [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bxzm4
Cheung, M. W.-L. (2020). Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/epsqt
Abdelrahman, M. K. (2020, April 14). Personality Traits, Risk Perception and Social Distancing During COVID-19. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6g7kh
Gleam Project | COVID-19 Mobility USA
Crystal, J. (2020, May 18). Mobilizing behavioral scientists to respond to COVID-19. Psychonomic Society Featured Content. https://featuredcontent.psychonomic.org/mobilizing-behavioral-scientists-to-respond-to-covid-19/
Retrieved June 10, 2020 from https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/05/12/2-perspectives-on-the-relevance-of-social-science-to-our-current-predicament-1-social-scientists-should-back-off-or-2-social-science-has-a-lot-to-offer/
Fischer, R., Karl, J. A., Bortolini, T., Zilberberg, M., Robinson, K., Rabelo, A. L. A., … Mattos, P. (2020, April 22). Rapid review and meta-meta-analysis of self-guided interventions to address anxiety, depression and stress during COVID-19 social distancing. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ndyf4
Wang, T., Chen, X., Zhang, Q., & Jin, X. (2020, April 26). Use of Internet data to track Chinese behavior and interest in COVID-19. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/j6m8q
Fronapfel, B. H., & Demchak, M. (2020, April 12). School’s Out for COVID-19: 50 Ways BCBA Trainees in Special Education Settings Can Accrue Independent Fieldwork Experience Hours During the Pandemic. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/cr3uv
Hill-Cawthorne, G. (2020). COVID-19: Insights from behavioural science. https://post.parliament.uk/analysis/covid-19-insights-from-behavioural-science/, https://post.parliament.uk/analysis/covid-19-insights-from-behavioural-science/