for - 2nd Trump term - 2nd Trump presidency - 2024 U.S. election - existential threat for climate crisis - Title:Trump 2.0: The climate cannot survive another Trump term - Author: Michael Mann - Date: Nov 5, 2023

Summary - Michael Mann repeats a similiar warning he made before the 2020 U.S. elections. Now the urgency is even greater. - Trump's "Project 2025" fossil-fuel -friendly plan would be a victory for the fossil fuel industry. It would - defund renewable energy research and rollout - decimate the EPA, - encourage drilling and - defund the Loss and Damage Fund, so vital for bringing the rest of the world onboard for rapid decarbonization. - Whoever wins the next U.S. election will be leading the U.S. in the most critical period of the human history because our remaining carbon budget stands at 5 years and 172 days at the current rate we are burning fossil fuels. Most of this time window overlaps with the next term of the U.S. presidency. - While Mann points out that the Inflation Reduction Act only takes us to 40% rather than Paris Climate Agreement 60% less emissions by 2030, it is still a big step in the right direction. - Trump would most definitely take a giant step in the wrong direction. - So Trump could singlehandedly set human civilization on a course of irreversible global devastation.

for - 2nd Trump term - regressive climate policy

for - 2nd Trump presidency - elimination of loss and damage fund - impact on global decarbonization effort

• While we have seen renewed leadership on climate by the Biden administration,
• other nations are wary of what a second Trump presidency could portend,
• particularly on climate
  • where they fear he will refuse to honor our commitments to the rest of the world
• and derail four years of progress on climate.

for - loss and damage fund - global impact

• That’s what the “loss and damage” agreement does,
• and it could lead to a greater willingness by India and other developing countries
• to ramp up their own commitments to decarbonization.

Zwei der Reports, die zum Weltwirtschaftsforum 2024 publiziert wurden, betonen die Bedeutung von Risiken, die mit der globalen Erhitzung, der Zerstörung der Biodiversität und der lebenserhaltenden Systeme des Planeten verbunden sind. Der Artikel der Repubblica zählt klimapolitisch wichtige Ereignisse des Jahres 2024 auf.https://www.repubblica.it/green-and-blue/2024/01/17/news/world_economic_forum_2024_cambiamento_climatico-421899576/

Eine neue Studie ergibt, dass 62.000 bis 70.000 Todesfälle in Europa im Jahr 2022 mit extremer Hitze in Verbindung standen. Mit 18 000 Toten stand Italien dabei an der Spitze. In der Studie werden vor allem Antworten auf methodische Fragen gesucht https://www.repubblica.it/green-and-blue/2023/11/21/news/vittime_decessi_caldo_europa_2022-420898495/

Reportage der New York Times über Veränderungen in der reisproduktion, die vor allem durch die globale Erhitzung erzwungen werden. Aber auch die hohen methanemissionen und ökologische Veränderungen durch den Wasserverbrauch für die reiseproduktion wirken sich aus. Insgesamt gefährdet die Klimakatastrophe gerade in Bezug auf Reis die Lebensmittelsicherheit. Konzerne versuchen durch die Entwicklung von Gentechnik von dieser Situation zu profitieren. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/05/20/climate/rice-farming-climate-change.html

Das Dengue-Fieber bedroht neuen Erkenntnissen der Weltgesundheits-Organisation zufolge inzwischen fast die Hälfte der Menschheit. Globale Erhitzung, Entwaldung und Verstädterung tragen Zug Verbreitung der Mücken bei, die diese und ähnliche Krankheiten übertragen. https://www.repubblica.it/salute/2023/04/21/news/dengue_argentina_allarme_oms-397048836/?ref=RHLF-BG-I397036947-P14-S1-T1

tantangan lingkungan, sosial, dan ekonomi UNTUK MANUSIA DAN PLANET >> itu kenapa tidak relevan lagi menolak penerbitan makalah karena hanya membahas kawasan yang spesifik saja. Apapun yang Anda bahas selama itu terkait dengan kehidupan manusia, maka itu akan memiliki dampak global.

‘No one wanted to read’ his book on pandemic psychology – then Covid hit. (2021, August 19). The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/aug/19/book-psychology-pandemics-steven-taylor

(7) BUSPH COVID Corps—YouTube. (n.d.). Retrieved 4 August 2021, from https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_VJ9KJ-9aLzZs4CeUahZ8g

Ashokkumar, A., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2021). The Social and Psychological Changes of the First Months of COVID-19. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/a34qp

Speyer, L. G., Marryat, L., & Auyeung, B. (2021). Effects of COVID-19 Public Health Safety Measures on Births in Scotland between March and May 2020. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7c5nf

Behavioural Insights & COVID-19: Lessons From the Global South: Africa. (n.d.). Eventbrite. Retrieved 1 March 2021, from https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/137272183797?aff=efbneb

Haug, N., Geyrhofer, L., Londei, A., Dervic, E., Desvars-Larrive, A., Loreto, V., Pinior, B., Thurner, S., & Klimek, P. (2020). Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(12), 1303–1312. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01009-0

Aknin, L., Neve, J.-E. D., Dunn, E., Fancourt, D., Goldberg, E., Helliwell, J., Jones, S. P., Karam, E., Layard, R., Lyubomirsky, S., Rzepa, A., Saxena, S., Thornton, E., VanderWeele, T., Whillans, A., Zaki, J., Caman, O. K., & Amour, Y. B. (2021). A Review and Response to the Early Mental Health and Neurological Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zw93g

Dr Natalie Shenker on Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved October 13, 2020, from https://twitter.com/DrNShenker/status/1314475759508107265

Kavanagh, M. M. (2020). US elections and a foreign policy for pandemics. The Lancet Public Health, 5(10), e517–e518. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30211-5

r/BehSciResearch—Inertia in academic priorities. (n.d.). Reddit. Retrieved June 16, 2020, from https://www.reddit.com/r/BehSciResearch/comments/h9cilq/inertia_in_academic_priorities/

5 myths about face masks under the microscope. (n.d.). World Economic Forum. Retrieved 12 August 2020, from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/08/coronavirus-face-masks-myths/

Association, N. S. and P. (n.d.). Covid-19 lockdowns will have little lasting impact on global warming. New Scientist. Retrieved August 10, 2020, from https://www.newscientist.com/article/2251313-covid-19-lockdowns-will-have-little-lasting-impact-on-global-warming/

UCL-Lancet Lecture 2020: Global Health Preparedness in the Face of Emerging Epidemics. (2020, July 13). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqE48fmyRkw&feature=youtu.be

Wilson, D. E., Joanna. (n.d.). COVID-19: Six months on the frontline (An Imperial Story). Retrieved 11 July 2020, from https://www.imperial.ac.uk/stories/covid-19-first-six-months/

Breznau, N. (2020). The Welfare State and Risk Perceptions: The Novel Coronavirus Pandemic and Public Concern in 70 Countries. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/96fd2

writers, G. (2020, June 18). World spends to protect culture from economic ruin. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2020/jun/18/world-spends-to-protect-culture-from-economic-ruin

Pettifor, A. (2020). Rebuild the ramshackle global financial system. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01507-1

Gou, W., Huang, S., Chen, J., Li, X., & Chen, Q. (2020). Structural and Dynamic of Global Population Migration Network. ArXiv:2006.02208 [Physics]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.02208

Lee, K., Worsnop, C. Z., Grépin, K. A., & Kamradt-Scott, A. (2020). Global coordination on cross-border travel and trade measures crucial to COVID-19 response. The Lancet, 395(10237), 1593–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31032-1

DFG, German Research Foundation—Call for Multidisciplinary Research into Epidemics and Pandemics in Response to the Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2. (n.d.). Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://www.dfg.de/en/research_funding/announcements_proposals/2020/info_wissenschaft_20_20/