Safety Index: 47.90

2,206,488

105.4 km2 (40.7 sq mi)

France

43.85   Moderate

74.23   High

47.90   Moderate

43.65   Moderate

Traffic Commute Time Index 15.00   Very Low

Health Care Index 91.67   Very High

Sweden

52.94 km2 (20.44 sq mi)

44.00   Moderate

49.87   Moderate

63.89   High

Safety Index: 43.65

50.00 Moderate

37.50 Low

43.51%

Safety Index: 49.87

2,560.17

21.96

17.65 Very Low

15.28 Very Low

Health Care System Index: 70.31

Safety Index: 55.34

Mortgage as Percentange of Income: 66.37%

 Sweden

572,779

447.76 km2 (172.88 sq mi)

13

4

2

10

10

10

10

13

31

31

31

13

13

1,602,457

1,602,457

1,602,457

24,780,180

2,929,963 30 32.2 18 9,219,679 26 101.3 5

24,780,180

24,780,180

2,929,963 30 32.2 18 9,219,679 26 101.3 5

2,929,963 30 32.2 18 9,219,679 26 101.3 5

2,929,963 30 32.2 18 9,219,679 26 101.3 5

Score 85 / 100

Score 85 / 100

Score 85 / 100

Score 70 / 100

Score 70 / 100

Score 70 / 100

Score 84 / 100

Score 84 / 100

Score 84 / 100

0.855

0.847

0.847

0.847

0.839

0.855

0.839

0.839

0.855

0.855

CO2 Emission Index: 2,527.37

Time Index (in minutes): 40.30

Mortgage as Percentange of Income: 90.71%

Dissatisfaction with Garbage Disposal

Health Care System Index: 67.03

Safety Index: 52.05

€65,700 (US$74,000)

952,058

Sweden

188 km2 (73 sq mi)

Largest census metropolitan areas in Canada by population (2016 Census) viewtalkedit CMA Province Population CMA Province Population Toronto Ontario 5,928,040 London Ontario 494,069 Montreal Quebec 4,098,927 St. Catharines–Niagara Ontario 406,074 Vancouver British Columbia 2,463,431 Halifax Nova Scotia 403,390 Calgary Alberta 1,392,609 Oshawa Ontario 379,848 Ottawa–Gatineau Ontario–Quebec 1,323,783 Victoria British Columbia 367,770 Edmonton Alberta 1,321,426 Windsor Ontario 329,144 Quebec Quebec 800,296 Saskatoon Saskatchewan 295,095 Winnipeg Manitoba 778,489 Regina Saskatchewan 236,481 Hamilton Ontario 747,545 Sherbrooke Quebec 212,105 Kitchener–Cambridge–Waterloo Ontario

Largest census metropolitan areas in Canada by population (2016 Census) viewtalkedit CMA Province Population CMA Province Population Toronto Ontario 5,928,040 London Ontario 494,069 Montreal Quebec 4,098,927 St. Catharines–Niagara Ontario 406,074 Vancouver British Columbia 2,463,431 Halifax Nova Scotia 403,390 Calgary Alberta 1,392,609

Vancouver British Columbia 2,463,431

Largest census metropolitan areas in Canada by population (2016 Census) viewtalkedit CMA Province Population CMA Province Population Toronto Ontario 5,928,040 London Ontario 494,069 Montreal Quebec 4,098,927 St. Catharines–Niagara Ontario 406,074 Vancouver British Columbia 2,463,431 Halifax Nova Scotia 403,390 Calgary Alberta 1,392,609

1 Sydney NSW 5,131,326 11 Hobart Tas 224,462 BrisbanePerth 2 Melbourne Vic 4,850,740 12 Geelong Vic 192,393 3 Brisbane Qld 2,408,223 13 Townsville Qld 178,864 4 Perth WA 2,043,138 14 Cairns Qld 150,041 5 Adelaide SA 1,333,927

2 Melbourne Vic 4,850,740

4 Perth WA 2,043,138

5 Adelaide SA 1,333,927

1,368,549

Milan

Region Capital Area (km2) Area (sq mi) Population Nominal GDP EURO billions (2016)[148] Nominal GDP EURO per capita(2016) [149] Abruzzo L'Aquila 10,763 4,156 1,331,574 32 24,100 Aosta Valley Aosta 3,263 1,260 128,298 4 34,900 Apulia Bari 19,358 7,474 4,090,105 72 17,800 Basilicata Potenza 9,995 3,859 576,619 12 20,600 Calabria Catanzaro 15,080 5,822 1,976,631 33 16,800 Campania Naples 13,590 5,247 5,861,529 107 18,300 Emilia-Romagna Bologna 22,446 8,666 4,450,508 154 34,600 Friuli-Venezia Giulia Trieste 7,858 3,034 1,227,122 37 30,300 Lazio Rome 17,236 6,655 5,892,425 186 31,600 Liguria Genoa 5,422 2,093 1,583,263 48 30,800 Lombardy Milan 23,844 9,206 10,002,615 367 36,600 Marche Ancona 9,366 3,616 1,550,796 41 26,600 Molise Campobasso 4,438 1,713 313,348 6 20,000 Piedmont Turin 25,402 9,808 4,424,467 129 29,400 Sardinia Cagliari 24,090 9,301 1,663,286 34 20,300 Sicily Palermo 25,711 9,927 5,092,080 87 17,200 Tuscany Florence 22,993 8,878 3,752,654

Liguria Genoa 5,422 2,093 1,583,263 48 30,800 Lombardy Milan 23,844 9,206 10,002,615 367 36,600

Region Capital Area (km2) Area (sq mi) Population Nominal GDP EURO billions (2016)[148] Nominal GDP EURO per capita(2016) [149] Abruzzo L'Aquila 10,763 4,156 1,331,574 32 24,100 Aosta Valley Aosta 3,263 1,260 128,298 4 34,900 Apulia Bari 19,358 7,474 4,090,105 72 17,800 Basilicata Potenza 9,995 3,859 576,619 12 20,600 Calabria Catanzaro 15,080 5,822 1,976,631 33 16,800 Campania Naples 13,590 5,247 5,861,529 107 18,300 Emilia-Romagna Bologna 22,446 8,666 4,450,508 154 34,600 Friuli-Venezia Giulia Trieste 7,858 3,034 1,227,122 37 30,300 Lazio Rome 17,236 6,655 5,892,425 186 31,600 Liguria Genoa 5,422 2,093 1,583,263 48 30,800 Lombardy Milan 23,844 9,206 10,002,615 367 36,600 Marche Ancona 9,366 3,616 1,550,796 41 26,600 Molise Campobasso 4,438 1,713 313,348 6 20,000 Piedmont Turin 25,402 9,808 4,424,467 129 29,400 Sardinia Cagliari 24,090 9,301 1,663,286 34 20,300 Sicily Palermo 25,711 9,927 5,092,080 87 17,200 Tuscany Florence 22,993 8,878 3,752,654 112 30,000 Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol Trento 13,607 5,254 1,055,934 42 39,755 Umbria Perugia 8,456 3,265 894,762 21 24,000 Veneto Venice 18,399 7,104 4,927,596 156 31,700

Time Index (in minutes):    34.00    39.27

CO2 Emission Index:    3,060.62

CO2 Emission Index:    3,060.62    2,960.06

 Land 825.56 km2

2,878.52 km2

Area 9,992.5 km2 (3,858.1 sq mi)

rea 12,367.7 km2 (4,775.2 sq mi)(GCCSA)[3]

rea 6,417.9 km2 (2,478.0

3,257.7 km2

Metro 5,905.71 km2

4,258.31 km2

Area[1] • Total 140.86 km2 (54.39 sq mi)

102.41 km2

243 square kilometres (94 sq mi) b

Water Pollution Low 39.11

Water Pollution Low 39.11 Low 21.25

Water Pollution Low 38.46

Water Pollution Low 38.46 Low 33.33

MontrealToronto Improve Data Improve Data Air Pollution Low 28.32 Low 33.55 Drinking Water Pollution and Inaccessibility Very Low 16.03 Very Low 18.92 Dissatisfaction with Garbage Disposal Low 23.64 Low 28.55 Dirty and Untidy Low 32.88 Low 35.83 Noise and Light Pollution Moderate 49.73 Moderate 44.97 Water Pollution Low 36.36

Water Pollution Low 36.36 Low 39.39

Quality of Green and Parks Very High 82.88 High 71.96

Very High 82.88 High 71.96

PerthMelbourne Improve Data Improve Data Air Pollution Very Low 19.20 Low 22.95 Drinking Water Pollution and Inaccessibility Very Low 14.96 Very Low 13.42 Dissatisfaction with Garbage Disposal Low 22.37 Low 24.18 Dirty and Untidy Low 25.56 Low 31.65 Noise and Light Pollution Low 35.80 Moderate 42.09 Water Pollution Low 32.50 Low 30.75 Dissatisfaction to Spend Time in the City Low 20.22 Very Low 19.68 Dissatisfaction with Green and Parks in the City Very Low 16.86 Very Low 16.74 Contributors:141227Last Update:August 2018August 2018 $(function() { $( "#first_air_pollution" ).progressbar({ value: 19.20 }); $( "#second_air_pollution" ).progressbar({ value: 22.95 }); $( "#first_drinking_water_pollution_and_inaccessibility" ).progressbar({ value: 14.96 }); $( "#second_drinking_water_pollution_and_inaccessibility" ).progressbar({ value: 13.42 }); $( "#first_dissatisfaction_garbage" ).progressbar({ value: 22.37 }); $( "#second_dissatisfaction_garbage" ).progressbar({ value: 24.18 }); $( "#first_dissatisfaction_clean_and_tidy" ).progressbar({ value: 25.56 }); $( "#second_dissatisfaction_clean_and_tidy" ).progressbar({ value: 31.65 }); $( "#first_noise_and_light_pollution" ).progressbar({ value: 35.80 }); $( "#second_noise_and_light_pollution" ).progressbar({ value: 42.09 }); $( "#first_water_pollution" ).progressbar({ value: 32.50 }); $( "#second_water_pollution" ).progressbar({ value: 30.75 }); $( "#first_uncomfotable_spend_time" ).progressbar({ value: 20.22 }); $( "#second_uncomfotable_spend_time" ).progressbar({ value: 19.68 }); $( "#first_dissatisfaction_green_and_parks" ).progressbar({ value: 16.86 }); $( "#second_dissatisfaction_green_and_parks" ).progressbar({ value: 16.74 }); }); Purity and Cleanliness Perth vs Melbourne PerthMelbourne Improve Data Improve Data Air quality Very High 80.80 High 77.05 Drinking Water Quality and Accessibility Very High 85.04 Very High 86.58 Garbage Disposal Satisfaction High 77.63 High 75.82 Clean and Tidy High 74.44 High 68.35 Quiet and No Problem with Night Lights High 64.20 Moderate 57.91 Water Quality High 67.50 High 69.25 Comfortable to Spend Time in the City High 79.78 Very High 80.32 Quality of Green and Parks Very High 83.14 Very High 83.26 Contributors:141227Last Update:August 2018August 2018 $(function() { $( "#first_air_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 80.80 }); $( "#second_air_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 77.05 }); $( "#first_drinking_water_quality_accessibility" ).progressbar({ value: 85.04 }); $( "#second_drinking_water_quality_accessibility" ).progressbar({ value: 86.58 }); $( "#first_garbage_disposal_satisfaction" ).progressbar({ value: 77.63 }); $( "#second_garbage_disposal_satisfaction" ).progressbar({ value: 75.82 }); $( "#first_clean_and_tidy" ).progressbar({ value: 74.44 }); $( "#second_clean_and_tidy" ).progressbar({ value: 68.35 }); $( "#first_noise_and_light_purity" ).progressbar({ value: 64.20 }); $( "#second_noise_and_light_purity" ).progressbar({ value: 57.91 }); $( "#first_water_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 67.50 }); $( "#second_water_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 69.25 }); $( "#first_comfortable_to_spend_time" ).progressbar({ value: 79.78 }); $( "#second_comfortable_to_spend_time" ).progressbar({ value: 80.32 }); $( "#first_green_and_parks_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 83.14 }); $( "#second_green_and_parks_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 83.26 }); }); (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); About In the News Newsletter API Copyright © 2009-2018 Numbeo. Your use of this service is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs'); (function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.5&appId=182369865155656"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk')); var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try { var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-10969791-1"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {}

Water Pollution Low 32.50 Low 30.75

Water Pollution Low 27.20 Low 33.87

AdelaideSydney Improve Data Improve Data Air Pollution Very Low 12.25 Low 25.67 Drinking Water Pollution and Inaccessibility Low 20.05 Very Low 13.79 Dissatisfaction with Garbage Disposal Low 22.28 Low 24.65 Dirty and Untidy Low 25.26 Low 30.65 Noise and Light Pollution Low 26.72 Moderate 43.53 Water Pollution Low 27.20 Low 33.87 Dissatisfaction to Spend Time in the City Very Low 14.39 Low 21.40 Dissatisfaction with Green and Parks in the City Very Low 13.83 Low 23.78 Contributors:102153Last Update:July 2018August 2018 $(function() { $( "#first_air_pollution" ).progressbar({ value: 12.25 }); $( "#second_air_pollution" ).progressbar({ value: 25.67 }); $( "#first_drinking_water_pollution_and_inaccessibility" ).progressbar({ value: 20.05 }); $( "#second_drinking_water_pollution_and_inaccessibility" ).progressbar({ value: 13.79 }); $( "#first_dissatisfaction_garbage" ).progressbar({ value: 22.28 }); $( "#second_dissatisfaction_garbage" ).progressbar({ value: 24.65 }); $( "#first_dissatisfaction_clean_and_tidy" ).progressbar({ value: 25.26 }); $( "#second_dissatisfaction_clean_and_tidy" ).progressbar({ value: 30.65 }); $( "#first_noise_and_light_pollution" ).progressbar({ value: 26.72 }); $( "#second_noise_and_light_pollution" ).progressbar({ value: 43.53 }); $( "#first_water_pollution" ).progressbar({ value: 27.20 }); $( "#second_water_pollution" ).progressbar({ value: 33.87 }); $( "#first_uncomfotable_spend_time" ).progressbar({ value: 14.39 }); $( "#second_uncomfotable_spend_time" ).progressbar({ value: 21.40 }); $( "#first_dissatisfaction_green_and_parks" ).progressbar({ value: 13.83 }); $( "#second_dissatisfaction_green_and_parks" ).progressbar({ value: 23.78 }); }); Purity and Cleanliness Adelaide vs Sydney AdelaideSydney Improve Data Improve Data Air quality Very High 87.75 High 74.33 Drinking Water Quality and Accessibility High 79.95 Very High 86.21 Garbage Disposal Satisfaction High 77.72 High 75.35 Clean and Tidy High 74.74 High 69.35 Quiet and No Problem with Night Lights High 73.28 Moderate 56.47 Water Quality High 72.80 High 66.13 Comfortable to Spend Time in the City Very High 85.61 High 78.60 Quality of Green and Parks Very High 86.17 High 76.22 Contributors:102153Last Update:July 2018August 2018 $(function() { $( "#first_air_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 87.75 }); $( "#second_air_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 74.33 }); $( "#first_drinking_water_quality_accessibility" ).progressbar({ value: 79.95 }); $( "#second_drinking_water_quality_accessibility" ).progressbar({ value: 86.21 }); $( "#first_garbage_disposal_satisfaction" ).progressbar({ value: 77.72 }); $( "#second_garbage_disposal_satisfaction" ).progressbar({ value: 75.35 }); $( "#first_clean_and_tidy" ).progressbar({ value: 74.74 }); $( "#second_clean_and_tidy" ).progressbar({ value: 69.35 }); $( "#first_noise_and_light_purity" ).progressbar({ value: 73.28 }); $( "#second_noise_and_light_purity" ).progressbar({ value: 56.47 }); $( "#first_water_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 72.80 }); $( "#second_water_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 66.13 }); $( "#first_comfortable_to_spend_time" ).progressbar({ value: 85.61 }); $( "#second_comfortable_to_spend_time" ).progressbar({ value: 78.60 }); $( "#first_green_and_parks_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 86.17 }); $( "#second_green_and_parks_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 76.22 }); }); (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); About In the News Newsletter API Copyright © 2009-2018 Numbeo. Your use of this service is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs'); (function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.5&appId=182369865155656"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk')); var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try { var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-10969791-1"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {}

Garbage Disposal Satisfaction High 77.72 High 75.35 Clean and Tidy High 74.74 High 69.35 Quiet and No Problem with Night Lights High 73.28 Moderate 56.47 Water Quality High 72.80 High 66.13 Comfortable to Spend Time in the City Very High 85.61 High 78.60 Quality of Green and Parks Very High 86.17 High 76.22 Contributors:102153Last Update:July 2018August 2018 $(function() { $( "#first_air_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 87.75 }); $( "#second_air_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 74.33 }); $( "#first_drinking_water_quality_accessibility" ).progressbar({ value: 79.95 }); $( "#second_drinking_water_quality_accessibility" ).progressbar({ value: 86.21 }); $( "#first_garbage_disposal_satisfaction" ).progressbar({ value: 77.72 }); $( "#second_garbage_disposal_satisfaction" ).progressbar({ value: 75.35 }); $( "#first_clean_and_tidy" ).progressbar({ value: 74.74 }); $( "#second_clean_and_tidy" ).progressbar({ value: 69.35 }); $( "#first_noise_and_light_purity" ).progressbar({ value: 73.28 }); $( "#second_noise_and_light_purity" ).progressbar({ value: 56.47 }); $( "#first_water_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 72.80 }); $( "#second_water_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 66.13 }); $( "#first_comfortable_to_spend_time" ).progressbar({ value: 85.61 }); $( "#second_comfortable_to_spend_time" ).progressbar({ value: 78.60 }); $( "#first_green_and_parks_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 86.17 }); $( "#second_green_and_parks_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 76.22 }); }); (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); About In the News Newsletter API Copyright © 2009-2018 Numbeo. Your use of this service is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs'); (function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.5&appId=182369865155656"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk')); var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try { var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-10969791-1"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {}

20,679,490Internet Users in Australia (2016*)Share of Australia Population: 85.1 % (penetration)Total Population : 24,309,330 Share of World Internet Users: 0.6 %Internet Users in the World: 3,424,971,237

0,679,490Internet Users in Australia (2016*)Share of Australia Population: 85.1 % (penetration)Total Population : 24,309,330 Share of World Internet Users: 0.6 %Internet Users in the World: 3,424,971,237

20,679,490Internet Users in Australia (2016*)Share of Australia Population: 85.1 % (penetration)Total Population : 24,309,330 Share of World Internet Users: 0.6 %Internet Users in the World: 3,424,971,237

20,679,490Internet Users in Australia (2016*)Share of Australia Population: 85.1 % (penetration)Total Population : 24,309,330 Share of World Internet Users: 0.6 %Internet Users in the World: 3,424,971,237

Share of Italy Population: 65.6 % (penetration)

39,211,518Internet Users in Italy (2016*)Share of Italy Population: 65.6 % (penetration)Total Population : 59,801,004

39,211,518Internet Users in Italy (2016*)Share of Italy Population: 65.6 % (penetration)Total Population : 59,801,004 Share of World Internet Users: 1.1 %

39,211,518Internet Users in Italy (2016*)Share of Italy Population: 65.6 % (penetration)Total Population : 59,801,004 Share of World Internet Users: 1.1 %

Mortgage as Percentange of Income: 109.17%

Mortgage as Percentange of Income:    61.41%    109.17%

Mortgage as Percentange of Income:    49.26%

Mortgage as Percentange of Income:    49.26%    92.60%

Mortgage as Percentange of Income:    47.85%    86.54%

Mortgage as Percentange of Income:    47.85%

Mortgage as Percentange of Income:

Mortgage as Percentange of Income:    34.58%

Mortgage as Percentange of Income:    49.27%    67.56%

   6.60    8.93 Mortgage as Percentange of Income:    49.27%

Mortgage as Percentange of Income:    35.86%    80.20%

Price to Income Ratio:    4.83    10.74 Mortgage as Percentange of Income:    35.86%

32,120,519Internet Users in Canada (2016*)Share of Canada Population: 88.5 % (penetration)Total Population : 36,286,378 Share of World Internet Users: 0.9 %Internet Users in the World: 3,424,971,237

32,120,519Internet Users in Canada (2016*)Share of Canada Population: 88.5 % (penetration)Total Population : 36,286,378 Share of World Internet Users: 0.9 %Internet Users in the World: 3,424,971,237

32,120,519Internet Users in Canada (2016*)Share of Canada Population: 88.5 % (penetration)Total Population : 36,286,378 Share of World Internet Users: 0.9 %Internet Users in the World: 3,424,971,237

32,120,519Internet Users in Canada (2016*)Share of Canada Population: 88.5 % (penetration)Total Population : 36,286,378 Share of World Internet Users: 0.9 %Internet Users in the World: 3,424,971,237

Score 50 / 100

Score 50 / 100 i A country or territory’s score indicates the perceived level of public sector corruption on a scale of 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean). Learn more.

Score 50 / 100

Score 50 / 100

Score 82 / 100 i A country or territory’s score indicates the perceived level of public sector corruption on a scale of 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean). Learn more.

Score 82 / 100

Score 82 / 100

Score 82 / 100

13 / 180 i A country's rank indicates its position relative to the other countries in the index. Learn more. Score 77 / 100

Score 77 / 100

Score 77 / 100

Rank 13 / 180 i A country's rank indicates its position relative to the other countries in the index. Learn more. Score 77 / 100

Quality of Green and Parks

Water Pollution39.11

Quality of Green and Parks Low 29.17 High 73.08

Quality of Green and Parks Low 29.1

Quality of Green and Parks63.04 High

Garbage Disposal Satisfaction

Quality of Green and Parks Very High 83.14 Very High 86.32

Quality of Green and Parks Very High 83.1

Quality of Green and Parks Very High 83.26 High 76.22

Quality of Green and Parks Very High 83.26 High 76.22 Contributors:227153Last Update:August 2018August 2018 $(function() { $( "#first_air_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 77.05 }); $( "#second_air_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 74.33 }); $( "#first_drinking_water_quality_accessibility" ).progressbar({ value: 86.58 }); $( "#second_drinking_water_quality_accessibility" ).progressbar({ value: 86.21 }); $( "#first_garbage_disposal_satisfaction" ).progressbar({ value: 75.82 }); $( "#second_garbage_disposal_satisfaction" ).progressbar({ value: 75.35 }); $( "#first_clean_and_tidy" ).progressbar({ value: 68.35 }); $( "#second_clean_and_tidy" ).progressbar({ value: 69.35 }); $( "#first_noise_and_light_purity" ).progressbar({ value: 57.91 }); $( "#second_noise_and_light_purity" ).progressbar({ value: 56.47 }); $( "#first_water_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 69.25 }); $( "#second_water_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 66.13 }); $( "#first_comfortable_to_spend_time" ).progressbar({ value: 80.32 }); $( "#second_comfortable_to_spend_time" ).progressbar({ value: 78.60 }); $( "#first_green_and_parks_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 83.26 }); $( "#second_green_and_parks_quality" ).progressbar({ value: 76.22 }); }); (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); About In the News Newsletter API Copyright © 2009-2018 Numbeo. Your use of this service is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs'); (function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.5&appId=182369865155656"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk')); var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try { var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-10969791-1"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {}

Air quality80.80 Very High Drinking Water Quality and Accessibility85.04 Very High Garbage Disposal Satisfaction77.63 High Clean and Tidy74.44 High Quiet and No Problem

Garbage Disposal Satisfaction75.35 High

Garbage Disposal Satisfaction75.82 High Clean and Tidy68.35 High Quiet and No Problem with Night Lights57.91 Moderate Water Quality69.25 High Comfortable to Spend Time in the City80.32 Very High Quality of Green and Parks83.26 Very High

Air quality77.86 High Drinking Water Quality and Accessibility87.22 Very High Garbage Disposal Satisfaction82.85

Garbage Disposal Satisfaction76.29 High

Garbage Disposal Satisfaction76.36 High

Garbage Disposal Satisfaction71.45 High

Garbage Disposal Satisfaction51.92 Moderate

Garbage Disposal Satisfaction47.92 Moderate