1,738 Matching Annotations
  1. Dec 2025
    1. Meshtastic utilizes LoRa, a long-range radio protocol, which is widely accessible in most regions without the need for additional licenses or certifications, unlike ham radio operations.

      Meshtastic positions itself as a radio protocol without need for licensing such as in ham radio. Meaning it's fully in parallel to ham emergency networks like the Dutch DARES.

    1. Hieronder de lijst van AI-boeken die ik gelezen heb en je aan kan raden. Klik meteen door naar de langere omschrijving of scroll verder. Ze staan op de volgorde waarin ik ze uitgelezen heb: Weapons of Math Destruction: over desastreuze algoritmes Code Dependent: over de achterkant van AI Onze kunstmatige toekomst: over de etische kant van AI Empire of AI: over de opkomst van OpenAI Your face belongs to us: over de opkomst van ClearView AI Atlas van de digitale wereld: over de geo-politiek van AI The Digital Republic: over het reguleren van technologie Toezicht houden in het tijdperk van AI: over de juiste vragen stellen over AI

      [[Elja Daae]] recommended reading list wrt AI [[Weapons of Math Destruction by Cathy O Neil]] (have it since 2017) [[Code Dependent by Madhumita Murgia]] bought it in August in ramsj [[The Digital Republic by Jamie Susskind]] I noted in 2024 as possible reading. [[Atlas van de digitale wereld by Haroon Sheikh]] I have too Other's are unknown to me. Interesting list, as it shaped their view on their role in AI public policy I presume

    2. The Digital Republic van Jamie Susskind (2023) is nogal een boekwerk. Niet iets dat je in een avondje uitleest. Maar het is wel een heel belangrijk boek, want het gaat over de vraag hoe we als samenleving technologie kunnen reguleren.

      [[The Digital Republic by Jamie Susskind]], already jotted down the title [[Daglog 29-10-2024]] at Dussmann's in Berlin, 2023 book. [[Elja Daae]] recommends it in this list. - [ ] check for review / summary [[The Digital Republic by Jamie Susskind]] #digitalpolicy #reading

    1. https://web.archive.org/web/20251202103136/https://www.marketplace.org/story/2024/10/24/private-equity-buying-up-businesses-in-the-skilled-trades-hvac-plumbing-electrician

      #2024/10 article describing how private equity firms are buying up skilled trades companies. Plumbers, solar panel / heat pump installers etc. A weak signal imo. Would you want private equity in real world entities? It's one thing for 'new fields' or scale-ups etc. Another when extraction hits trades we rely on (although easy enough for other entrants to help circumvent)

      (via [[Chris Aldrich]])

  2. Nov 2025
    1. American cloud giants Amazon, Microsoft and Google, as well as Chinese tech giants Huawei and Alibaba, are all members of Gaia-X. In 2021, the annual summit in Milan was sponsored by Huawei and Alibaba, prompting backlash.

      Same is happening wrt IDSA, who have a global orientation, but are treated as EU grouping, which they're not.

    2. Those firms “steered the entire roadmap,” Lechelle said, throwing money and people at it. “The committees were drowning. They [global players] had the capacity, the bandwidth, but we were already underwater ... Americans have full-time lobbyists and massive budgets. Their job is basically to derail any initiative they don’t like.”

      Key friction. One cannot rule out non-EU parties mostly, esp their EU entities. But presence often obstructive / malicious compliance. You'd need much better governance / rulebooks upfront to flag and remove.

    3. of a data space based on Gaia-X standards that French energy company EDF will use to securely coordinate the construction of new nuclear sites

      example of DS project, here led by EDF for nuclear plant construction. Link w energy DS program? -[ ] zoek naar EDF DS voorbeeld voor bouw kerncentrales #geonovumtb/ds

    4. That’s how the mission to create a “federated cloud infrastructure” came to life. But that “staggering complexity” would soon turn into an “unmanageable mess,” said Lechelle.

      federated cloud concept originates in Gaia-X article says. Don't know if that's right. In itself that does not create 'staggering complexity' though. It is a different design path.

    5. “I joined Gaia-X because I believed in the original mission. I left Gaia-X because I didn’t believe it was going in the original direction,” said its former CEO, Francesco Bonfiglio.

      Gaia-X moved the goalposts original member says.

    6. The results we’re providing and the real business benefits these interoperable data spaces are creating are more and more visible,” he said, highlighting the example of a data space based on Gaia-X standards that French energy company EDF will use to securely coordinate the construction of new nuclear sites.

      again an impact example that is still in the future, a planned result, not an achieved one.

    7. Current CEO Ulrich Ahle, who joined in 2023, pushed back — saying Gaia-X is far from a “failure.” It has united the industry — both large and small players — around tangible deliverables, such as federated data spaces and compliance labels, he said.

      federated data spaces are not an outcome of gaiax, are they? EC induced. Do note that deliverables after all those years are still in the future.

    1. On the erosion of middle class America. Poverty line is around 140k if actual costs taken into account. The 1960s benchmark assumed cost of food to be 1/3 of overall costs. Now it's 7% or so, meaning 1/15 of overall costs. This pushes up the poverty line to 5 times the level used, or some 150k USD pa

      Example of a proxy being used as 'measurement' and the assumptions in a proxy never re-evaluated.

    1. This page lifts quite a bit out of my descriptions of networked agency, a term I coined 2016, without attribution. It reads like a generated text. Unclear too what the point of the site is at all.

    1. Resumability is not a word, but it’s an important concept to me. When I say Resumability, I’m talking about the ability to quickly interrupt and later resume a task.

      [[Steven Garrity]] coining 'resumability' , where a device just continues on where you were previously. Mentions e-readers as such devices (and paper books with a bookmark), a smartphone and apps like Slack. The latter is not true I think, it scrolls fwd to newest.

      Thinking about resumability in terms of notes / pkm. Obsidian is always where I was previously e.g. A type of ratchet for task execution.

    1. For example, you may need a working shop or a working painting studio. You may need a working music studio. Or a computer room where you can write something. It’s crucial to have a setup, so that, at any given moment, when you get an idea, you have the place and the tools to make it happen.

      Quote David Lynch https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catching_the_Big_Fish continued.

      Mentions examples of set-ups for different activities. Vgl spaces on laptop. Vgl my home office vs attic space etc.

      Vgl [[%index coachingboekje]] wrt set-ups I need/want/woud like to have or list of set-ups currently available to me.

    2. If you don’t have a setup, there are many times when you get the inspiration, the idea, but you have no tools, no place to put it together. And the idea just sits there and festers. Over time, it will go away. You didn’t fulfill it—and that’s just a heartache.

      Quote David Lynch https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catching_the_Big_Fish continued.

      Not having a set-up ready when an idea hits means no agency. Mentions festering a type of powerlessness, vgl [[%I Networked Agency]] wrt methods and tools for various things. Also vgl making note of any idea in 3Ideeenkweekkas

    1. Lynch's idea that "ideas are like fish. If you want to catch little fish, you can stay in the shallow water. But if you want to catch the big fish, you've got to go deeper". To Lynch, going deeper means experiencing a deeper, more expanded state of consciousness, a transcendental or fourth state of consciousness,[2] an experience he has during meditation but believes is rare in ordinary daily life.[6] According to Lynch, this experience expands artistic capacity.[4]

      Source of title Catching the Big Fish. Aside from the meditation angle, this points to practice / reflection, ratchets, and [[Holding questions 20091015123253]] etc.

    1. Funny. Cryptographers club held elections, but cannot access results as one of the three keys needed to see results was lost by one of the people involved. They did not design for human failure / lapses in operational precision. Typical. Vgl the cartoon with laptop w unbreakable login and person taking a bat to the one who knows the login.

    1. Jarche shares 14 ways to acquire knowledge from the quintessential PKM practicer, Maria Popova at The Marginalian, and her review _You Can Do Anything_ by James Mangan, written in 1936. He then categorizes the methods in terms of how they align with PKM in this graphic from Jarche:

      Maria Popova https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Popova http://themarginalian.org/

      [[You Can Do Anything by James Mangan]] 1936 review: 14 ways to acquire K. https://www.themarginalian.org/2013/04/22/14-ways-to-acquire-knowledge-james-mangan-1936/ "prolific self-help guru and famous eccentric" https://archive.org/details/bwb_W8-ANG-369/ can be borrowed.

    1. Jorge Arango talks about his writing process. He actually co-authored a book on Information Architecture in 2015. This vid more about his latest. uses lots of paper notebooks Mentions 3 (obvious) phases in his non-fiction writing research structuring writing Says all three req diff tools. (he uses Obsidian f research)

      Stage 1 research, vague idea about what topic, (s paper notebooks, index/sequence them) His book duly noted is on this phase.

      Stage 2 structuring. mistake to go directly to writing. (vgl [[A System for Writing by Bob Doto]] ) Mentions author Robert Caro who had book structure on his wall story book like, vgl what I do when writing reports w wall of post its for structure. Limitation is size of wall. But physcial movement helpt. He does this type of wall in [[Tinderbox]] !!!! canvas, with the sticky notes having metadata. His chapter and heading structure emerges from it! Prevents getting lost in the details. Shows him what is missing too (looping back to research phase sometimes). It's not writing but getting a sense of the narrative flow of the entire thing. Seems like outlining of talks, but a book is bigger and thus the outlining is more filled out with links to material

      What question would a reader have entering chapter 2 after reading chapter 1, and go from there. Has opening story/anecdote for each chapter. Mwah. Uses the story board view like how the periodic table suggested the existence of atoms that had not been discovered yet. Dmitri Mendleev.

      Stage 3 writing After structuring the writing tools come into play. He used Scrivener, avoiding having a monolithic text. Now Ulysses, in markdown. Uses word count targets in these tools for sections/chapters

      set up supportive environments for each pahse structure first but keep flexible, don't make it a linear process, but structure ulnocks the writing swith modalities - walking, free form in [[Tinderbox]] or another tool, to avoid getting stuck.

    1. This transition is signaled by focused efforts from several major scientists and technology entities. Meta Chief AI Scientist Yann LeCun has emphasized his intent to pursue world models, while Fei-Fei Li’s World Labs has released its Marble model publicly. Concurrently, Google is testing its Genie models, and Nvidia is developing its Omniverse and Cosmos platforms for physical AI.

      Various examples of world model work: Nex to Yann LeCun. Fei-Fei Li World Labs w Marble model, Google has Genie models, Nvidia Omniverse and Cosmos.

    1. On Tuesday, news broke that he may soon be leaving Meta to pursue a startup focused on so-called world models, technology that LeCun thinks is more likely to advance the state of AI than Meta’s current language models.

      Yann LeCun says world models more promising. What are world models?

    1. De bank maakte woensdag ook cijfers over het derde kwartaal bekend. Daarin boekte ABN een winst van 617 miljoen euro, op een omzet van 2,16 miljard. Beide zijn wat lager dan in dezelfde periode het jaar ervoor.

      Wut? 617/2160 is 28,5% winst in het 3e kwartaal. 'lager dan vorig jaar'. Het lijkt me een heel hoog winstpercentage.

    1. [[Links]] like a wiki (except they are [[Linked Mentions|bi-directional]]).

      The bidirectional takes the form of linked mentions underneath a linked to note. That's common even in wiki I think these days. Any tools out there that link closer to like Ted Nelson proposed? Within a pkm tool bidirectional linking into a specific spot in a note should be somehow doable. Transclusion is a step further even, but if I can link to a paragraph, that paragraph should be able to link to where it is cited, no? In Obsidian the ^ link is still one way, while origin and source are known for it to work (the reference number)

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    1. George Gilder. Reagan era supply side economist, 85yo, Called the opportunities of internet tech relatively early, and wrote a book about Carver Mead and CMOS chiptech. Founder of the Discovery Institute and loud on 'intelligent design'. Not sure any of that qualifies him to talk about wafer sized chips systems.

    1. George Gilder indeed calls for wafer scale compute. Article mentions the issues of one flaw meaning having to toss the wafer (as opposed to 1 chip cut from the wafer). Also says that bc of that wafer solutions are for highly specialised set-ups only (bc it's costly to end up with one flawless wafer).

    1. WSJ article contends that chips will soon be obsolete, and replaced by wafers that function as a fully integrated system. I have questions (and most of the article is missing). Wafers are error prone, and while you can toss out individual chips cut from wafers, having to throw out an entire wafer is costly. Other factor is that whatever size you will have surrounding electronics too, making wafers unwieldy / brittle parts of a system. Also wondering about heat. Talks about 'suitcase sized datacenters'. I wonder what the technology jump is for that to be viable

    1. n our latest findings, the share of respondents reporting mitigation efforts for risks such as personal and individual privacy, explainability, organizational reputation, and regulatory compliance has grown since we last asked about risks associated with AI overall in 2022.

      did they also ask whether those mitigation efforts negate gains in efficiency / innovation reported for AI?

    2. While a plurality of respondents expect to see little or no effect on their organizations’ total number of employees in the year ahead, 32 percent predict an overall reduction of 3 percent or more, and 13 percent predict an increase of that magnitude (Exhibit 17). Respondents at larger organizations are more likely than those at smaller ones to expect an enterprise-wide AI-related reduction in workforce size, while AI high performers are more likely than others are to expect a meaningful change, either in the form of workforce reductions or increases.

      Interesting to see companies vary in their est of how AI will impact workforce. A third expects reduction (but not much, about 3%), 13% an increase (AI related hiring), 43% no change.

    3. with nearly one-third of all respondents reporting consequences stemming from AI inaccuracy (Exhibit 19).

      A third of respondents admit they've seen 'at least once' negative consequences of inaccurate output. That sounds low, as 100% will have been given hallucinations. So 1-in-3 doesn't catch them all before they run-up damage. (vgl Deloitte's work in Australia)

    4. The online survey was in the field from June 25 to July 29, 2025, and garnered responses from 1,993 participants in 105 nations representing the full range of regions, industries, company sizes, functional specialties, and tenures. Thirty-eight percent of respondents say they work for organizations with more than $1 billion in annual revenues. To adjust for differences in response rates, the data are weighted by the contribution of each respondent’s nation to global GDP.

      2k self selected respondents in 50% of nations. 4/10 are big corporates (over 1 billion USD annual revenue)

    5. McKinsey survey on AI use in corporations, esp perceptions and expectations. No actual measurements. I suspect it mostly measure the level of hype that respondents currently buy into.

    1. AI checking AI inherits vulnerabilities, Hays warned. "Transparency gaps, prompt injection vulnerabilities and a decision-making chain becomes harder to trace with each layer you add." Her research at Salesforce revealed that 55% of IT security leaders lack confidence that they have appropriate guardrails to deploy agents safely.

      abstracting away responsibilities is a dead-end. Over half of IT security think now no way to deploy agentic AI safely.

    2. When two models share similar data foundations or training biases, one may simply validate the other's errors faster and more convincingly. The result is what McDonagh-Smith describes as "an echo chamber, machines confidently agreeing on the same mistake." This is fundamentally epistemic rather than technical, he said, undermining our ability to know whether oversight mechanisms work at all.

      Similarity between models / training data creates an epistemic issue. Using them to control each other creates an echo chamber. Vgl [[Deontologische provenance 20240318113250]]

    3. Yet most organizations remain unprepared. When Bertini talks with product and design teams, she said she finds that "almost none have actually built it into their systems or workflows yet," treating human oversight as nice-to-have rather than foundational.

      Suggested that no AI using companies are actively prepping for AI Act's rules wrt human oversight.

    4. We're seeing the rise of a 'human on the loop' paradigm where people still define intent, context and accountability, whilst co-ordinating the machines' management of scale and speed," he explained.

      Human on the loop vs in

    1. Unklar ist derzeit offenbar noch, ob die weitere Umsetzung der KI-Verordnung in Teilen aufgeschoben wird.

      AI Act application might be postponed in parts

    2. Die Kommission will erreichen, dass sensible Daten enger definiert werden. Besonders geschützt wären dann nur noch jene Daten, die oben genannte Informationen explizit offenbaren. Das bedeutet: Gibt etwa eine Person in einem Auswahlfeld an, welche sexuelle Orientierung sie hat, wäre das weiterhin besonders geschützt. Schließt ein Datenverarbeiter aufgrund vermeintlicher Interessen oder Merkmale auf die mutmaßliche sexuelle Orientierung eines Menschen, würden bisherige Einschränkungen wegfallen.

      Special personal data not protected if inferred, only if explicitly collected as such?

    3. Das gilt etwa für das Training von KI-Systemen mit personenbezogenen Daten. Dies soll künftig auf Basis des berechtigten Interesses von Tech-Konzernen möglich sein. Die noch immer heftig geführte Debatte um möglicherweise notwendige Einwilligungen der Betroffenen hätte sich damit erledigt. Deutlich enger gefasst werden soll auch die Definition von pseudonymisierten Daten.

      Legitimite interest is being stretched it seems? I thought it was pretty strict wrt things an org would be required to collect / needs to collect for a necessary task.

    4. Im neuen Data Act sollen gleich drei weitere Gesetze aufgehen: die Open-Data-Richtlinie, die Verordnung über den freien Fluss nicht-personenbezogener Daten und der Data Governance Act.

      The DA will absorb ODD, DGA and free flow non-personal data Interesting, as ODD is a Directive now. ODD is based on national access regimes, so might be tricky as Reg, unless the focus is on HVD mostly.

    1. Er zijn andere manieren om hardware een eigen nummer te geven, zoals de PUF (physical unclonable function) in een chipontwerp.  PUF-codes worden niet ingeëtst, maar zijn gebaseerd op een statistisch sommetje in het chipontwerp.

      It is not PUF, which is on chip, and sensitive to environmental factors, as well as taking space on the wafer.

    2. Unieke chips helpen de schade te beperken. Het toevoegen van zo’n nummer hoeft niet veel te kosten: dat kan in een later stadium van de chipproductie met goedkope apparatuur.

      the ID is added after the hightech productionphase making it affordable.

    3. De controle van de identificatie vindt plaats op een streng beveiligde server en daarbij worden geen sleutels uitgewisseld, zoals bij gangbare beveiliging. Niemand in de hele productieketen kent de sleutel, ook voor SandGrain is het een geheim. Zelfs al zouden criminelen het systeem weten te omzeilen – wat volgens de SandGrainers niet kan – dan hebben ze toegang tot maar één apparaat. Dat maakt het veel ingewikkelder om een volledig netwerk te saboteren.

      Sandgrain is key less and zero-K. ID is done through a (central?) server though.

      Circumventing it gains access to just one device, not all devices that use the same chip.

    4. Het principe is simpel: een chip met een uniek nummer bewaakt de toegang tot de achterliggende elektronica. Alleen als dat nummer wordt herkend, krijgt de gebruiker toegang tot het systee

      The ID serves as a gatekeeper for access to the system it is used in.

    5. Een nieuw Nederlands initiatief werkt aan chips met een uniek nummer, die als een slot op de deur dienen voor elektronica in cruciale infrastructuur.

      SandGrain (Eindhovense spinoff, Joeri Voets en Sander Koopmans) provides every chip with a unique ID.

    1. un contributo a un ipotetico movimento culturale per un’ecologia della conoscenza in un ambiente mediatico a dir poco controverso. Perché non si pensa bene se si è informati male. Lo sviluppo dell’attuale forma di economia digitale, realizzato con una strategia di innovazioni disattenta alla qualità delle relazioni, ha generato esiti culturali evidentemente negativi, dei quali è tempo che la società si faccia carico, ripensando il sistema dei media in modo da renderlo compatibile con gli obiettivi democratici, ponendo fine al senso di ineluttabilità diffuso.

      The book aims for a cultural movement / ecology of knowledge in spite of the toxic platforms. Because those erode thinking well (title). Innovation now disregards the quality of relationships. (Nice, this chimes with my [[Menselijk en digitaal netwerk zijn gelijksoortig 20200810142551]] and the unfulfilled potential of exploring that congruence). The book proposes to review the mediasystem to make it align with democratic values.

    1. Nel mio libro, questo conduce a costruire un progetto di liberazione dal dominio delle mega-piattaforme attuali e suggerisce la possibilità di costruire molte piattaforme alternative a quelle gigantesche e sfruttatrici che attualmente costituiscono il sistema dei media. Nel libro di Ferraris, questo conduce a una proposta di redistribuzione del valore dei dati, in funzione di un progetto politico che porti a un nuovo, moderno, sistemico e pragmatico comunismo.

      Luca compares two books (his and Ferraris') in how they solve that relative value problem. Luca by proposing dismantling the dominant platforms and replace them with a multitude of others (as the volume of personal data aids its exploitation I presume, spreading it out means having to collect it and collection is costly if users don't actively bring it to you already). Ferraris proposes otoh an active redistribution of the value gained as political project a new 'pragmatic' and modern communism. De Biase proposal seems more achievable imo (in the sense that we're already doing it)

    2. È ovvio: il valore dei dati personali non esiste in sé ma in relazione a un contesto.

      Often not acknowledged what Luca says here: that it's obvious that n:: the value of personal data is not intrinsic but w.r.t. to a specific context of use. It's relative (and that is also why data protection of personal data isn't absolute, but weighed against other factors.) Perhaps capture it as Notie.

    1. Bohm advanced the view that quantum physics meant that the old Cartesian model of reality—that there are two kinds of substance, the mental and the physical, that somehow interact—was too limited. To complement it, he developed a mathematical and physical theory of "implicate" and "explicate" order.[3]

      Implicate and explicate order.

    1. Information Anxiety

      [[Information Anxiety by Richard Saul Wurman]] is the origin of the [[Informatie orden je altijd LATCH 20221106114119]] concept. This is from 1989, so no internet / digital considerations yet. In LATCH I wonder about the place of linking in it. Is the 1986 version aware of Ted Nelson's work 1960s. Or does linking come up in edition 2 in 2000: [[Information Anxiety 2 by Richard Saul Wurman]]

    2. Website of [[Richard Saul Wurman 20251110184844]] Ordered some of his books (not very easy to find) [[Information Anxiety by Richard Saul Wurman]] 1989 [[Information Architect by Richard Saul Wurman]] 1996 [[Information Anxiety 2 by Richard Saul Wurman]] 2000 [[UnderstandingUnderstanding by Richard Saul Wurman]] 2017.

    1. his work demonstrates for the first time that poisoning attacks instead require a near-constant number of documents regardless of dataset size. We conduct the largest pretraining poisoning experiments to date, pretraining models from 600M to 13B parameters on chinchilla-optimal datasets (6B to 260B tokens). We find that 250 poisoned documents similarly compromise models across all model and dataset sizes, despite the largest models training on more than 20 times more clean data

      The paper shows that it's not a percentage of training data that needs to be poisoned for an attack, but an almost fixed number of documents (250!) which is enough across large models too.

    2. Existing work has studied pretraining poisoning assuming adversaries control a percentage of the training corpus. However, for large models, even small percentages translate to impractically large amounts of data.

      It was previously assumed that a certain percentage of data needed to be 'poisoned' to attack an LLM. This becomes impractical quickly with the size of LLMs.

    1. LLM benchmarks are essential for tracking progress and ensuring safety in AI, but most benchmarks don't measure what matters.

      Paper concludes most benchmarks used for LLMs to establish progress are mistargeted / leave out aspects that matter.

    1. Her point is this: Metaphors are so often visual in nature, that we tend to equate understanding something with the ability to visualise it. Which explain why Einstein–always a visual thinkers–hated quantum mechanics. Because while the standard model helps making perfect mathematical sense of particle physics, it’s simply not possible to visualise what it proves to be true. But here’s the thing: metaphors don’t have to be visual in nature, and in fact going beyond the visual often allows us to naturally accommodate ambiguity. Trompe l’oeil images are just as maddening and hard to let go of as trying to visualise a quark that exists simultaneously in multiple places, but anyone can attest to feelings of ‘being torn‘ or ‘in two minds‘. Time is another metaphor that is notoriously hard to visualise, which hasn’t stopped anyone from experiencing it. Again it’s also a phenomenon that most of us feel behave in a highly irrational manner; slowing to a creep in one moment only to jump into action the next. The point that Julia Ravanis makes, the perspective she helps me see, is that quantum mechanics doesn’st have to ‘not make sense’. That the act of sense-making includes a chosen perspective, and that being mindful that there are more than one possible, even within science, means that the boundaries between it and the humanities are crumbling.

      [[Julia Ravanis]] in [[Skönheten i Kaos by Julia Ravanis]] is here said to argue that a way of moving past 'quantum mechanics does not make sense' is by letting go of default (visual) metaphors and using other metaphors that can embrace ambiguity. This sounds somewhat like [[Is het nieuwe uit te leggen in taal van het oude 20031104104340]] or even [[Avoid greedy reductionism 20041114065928]] accusation levelled here at Einstein.

    2. That the act of sense-making includes a chosen perspective, and that being mindful that there are more than one possible, even within science, means that the boundaries between it and the humanities are crumbling.

      overtones of sense making, and of SC style boundary crossing, with the notion of a chosen perspective, and [[Multidimensionaal gaan ipv platslaan 20200826121720]] as means. #verdiepen

    1. Aurora outperforms operational forecasts in predicting air quality, ocean waves, tropical cyclone tracks and high-resolution weather

      Aurora said to extrapolate for air quality, bathymetry, cyclone tracking and 'high resolution' weather (I suspect they mean the opposite, check in paper).

    2. Aurora is a machine learning model that can predict atmospheric variables, such as temperature. It is a foundation model, which means that it was first generally trained on a lot of data and then can be adapted to specialized atmospheric forecasting tasks with relatively little data. We provide four such specialized versions: one for medium-resolution weather prediction, one for high-resolution weather prediction, one for air pollution prediction, and one for ocean wave prediction.

      MS created foundation model Aurora, trained on over '1 million hours of diverse geophysical data' (they mean 1 million compute hours??), to use to predict atmospheric variables (temp) in August 2024.

    1. The files will have the same EXIF data they had when originally updated. Any details added to your photos after upload will be compiled in a separate JSON file.

      The downloads will include original exif data. If that has been altered (e.g. location or time (NB I adjusted some for diff timezones)) the alterations will be provided as JSON

    2. Flickr downloads of my images can be done: - by selecting 500 images at a time in Camera roll. This would be I think the best approach for timeline approaches. You get a downloadable zip. - by downloading an album. as zip - by downloading all my data, as zip. The text implies it will be in chunks of 500 images too, so perhaps also chronological? (in my case 87 zip files or so)

    1. Kommer den artificiella intelligensen att bli bättre på att tänka än den mänskliga? Kognitionsvetaren Peter Gärdenfors förklarar varför så inte är fallet.  Den mänskliga intelligensen består av en rad olika färdigheter och specialiteter som har förfinats under tusentals år. Mycket återstår innan den artificiella intelligensen kan mäta sig med det tänkande som inte bara människor utan även djur har. När vi förstår att vår intelligens är en bred palett av många olika förmågor ter sig tanken på att AI-tekniken trumfar oss i schack och kan skriva avancerade texter inte lika skrämmande. Utifrån ett brett forskningsunderlag förklarar Gärdenfors varför AI-tekniken inte kan och inte kommer att kunna tänka på samma sätt som människor och djur gör. »Peter Gärdenfors tilldelas Natur & Kulturs debattbokspris 2025 för att han fördjupar AI-debattens centrala begrepp och utmanar dess utgångspunkter. Med lätt språk och stabil lärdom blottlägger han tänkandets evolutionärt slipade mekanismer, och skärper bilden av vad intelligens är och vilken plats tekniken intar i vår digitala värld.« – Juryns motivering

      [[Kan AI tänka by Peter Gärdenfors]] via Sven Dahlstrand, dahlstrand.net Publ okt 2024 Seeks to define what thinking actually is, and how that plays out in other animals and humans. The 2nd part goes into sofrware systems and AI and how they work in comparison.

    1. Skönheten i kaosSkönheten i kaos (Natur och Kultur 2021) är Julias debutbok.I den tar hon ner den teoretiska fysiken på jorden ochjämför den med mänskliga erfarenheter. Förklaringar avsvarta hål och sammanflätade elektroner varvas medreflektioner om längtan och frustration, om att bli kär ochkänna andra människors blick på en själv.

      [[Skönheten i Kaos by Julia Ravanis]] (pub 2021, Swedish) Debut. Essay collection joining theoretical physics w philosophy Explains concepts like black holes, quantum entanglement, and string theory in an accessible form. (via Sven Dahlstrand, dahlstrand.net)

  3. Oct 2025
    1. LLMs aren’t capable of learning on-the-job, so no matter how much we scale, we’ll need some new architecture to enable continual learning.And once we have it, we won’t need a special training phase — the agent will just learn on-the-fly, like all humans, and indeed, like all animals.This new paradigm will render our current approach with LLMs obsolete.

      Richard Sutton on LLM dev: a) core problem is LLMs can't learn from use. Diff architecture necessary for continual learning b) if you've got continual learning then current big-bang training no longer useful. facit: LLM approach not sustainable and dead end.

    1. Stuff to unpack here, and read the three posts by [[Valdis Krebs]]. [[Stephen Downes]] draws analogy between social and neuronal networks, and suggests same underlying logic. This I think points back to my notion that fully embracing the network metaphor/thinking in tech hasn't happened and would be a valuable path forward out of current upheaval. Social networks etc have a certain symmetry that internet platforms ignore.

  4. Sep 2025
    1. Former UKIP MEP Nathan GIll admits to being bribed by Russia to make pro-Russian / anti-Ukrainian statements. The person carrying the money, Oleh Volosjyn also has ties to Dutch extreme right FvD party. Dutch secret service previously stated knowing about at least one Dutch politican having been bribed. Possibly De Graaff, then a MEP for FvD

    1. Main points: - Russia does not care about number of people lost, but cares about losing revenue. - Russia is a (imperialist) petrol-state, so Ukraine hits revenue there. - Ukraine's weapon production is increasingly independent from both US and Chinese production - Their drone production is fully home grown and has tight feedback loops to experiences in the field (home grown meaning that they also create their own pcb's from scratch etc.) - EU is funding / supporting that - Trump is words only, and is letting Biden admin sanctions run out without renewing them.

    1. open source dependencies as supply chain risk and attack surface, vs how, here Obsidian mitigates against them: - reimplement small functions directly in your own code - fork modules and maintain as own code base - large libraries include version locked files - strongly limit the 3rd party packages that ship in your code to others

      For those lockfiled dependencies have a process for updates (and for onboarding a new one), and don't quickly update what already works. Use time as a buffer: issues with 3rd party stuff will surface over time.

    1. Spanish cloud service provider a la Nextcloud and Proton. I hate it when website don't actually contain any info about legal entities running the show. Their LinkedIn profile says they're in Valencia, but the site doesn't mention where they are located.

    1. EU General Court rules on narrow challenge to EU-US data agreement letting it stand. Bound to be appealed at CJEU. NOYB thinks General Court departed strongly from earlier CJEU decisions (Schrems I and II) as current agreement doesn't really have new formulations, and that General Court accepts the independence DPCR which is not what the current reality in US is.

    1. In other words: it comes down to lack of agency. When we care about something, but we perceive futility in our efforts to change it, our only resort is to lash out.

      This quote is aimed at negative interaction wrt open source coding projects, but it fits resentment fueled populism too. Vgl [[Agency tekorten 20160818092829]] and [[Agency armoede digital poverty 20150819204958]]

  5. Aug 2025
    1. During one of those conversations Adosh pointed me to Demo, a “grammar” for understanding organisations as sets of commitments, agreements and transaction between people, by a group at Delft University. It builds on the speech-act theory of Jurgen Habermas (in turn building on Wittgenstein and Searle). As Elmine did her M Sc. on Habermas in relation to the type of communication possible in weblogs, this of course triggered my interest. I’ll try and dig a bit deeper into it in the coming weeks.

      this may be relevant to me now again, wrt governance frameworks in data spaces.

    1. US State Dept politicized human rights reports making them useless globally and aligning with China's perspective on human rights basically. Entire categories of reporting eliminated (seemingly as it would also contrast with domestic policies in the USA), and odd results such as listing Germany as worse than El Salvador. Mostly bc of things like treating any moderation of hate speech as censorship and limiting of freedom of speech, equating freedom of speech w freedom of consequences and responsibility. A peculiar US hang-up that happens to align with what makes bigtech platforms profitable. Another example of USA soft power not just being eroded but removed.

    1. So long, and thanks for all the fish,

      This is what the dolphins said after they were unsuccessful in warning humanity of Earth's impending demolition by the Vogons, and left.

      Is Dohmke just doing a nerdy goodbye here unaware of the context of the phrase or is this the actual message after various paragraphs of corporate marketing speak?

    2. https://web.archive.org/web/20250812045221/https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/goodbye-github/

      GitHub CEO steps down, will not be replaced, as GitHub will be folded into MS' CoreAI unit. This means attention will be unfocused wrt GitHub. Inertia will keep it upright for a while I'm sure, perhaps until GitHub is once more repositioned, but it may well be the end of it. Moves like this put community infrastructure as GitHub is under the hood and makes it invisible as just another piece of plumbing while ignoring the core role users have in its functioning.

      (Dohmke exited German startup HockeyApp to MS at the end of 2014 and moved to MS as part of that deal)

    1. Successful tests have already been completed by both the Eclipse Dataspace Connector (EDC) and the TNO-developed connector, demonstrating that multiple independent implementations can interoperate effectively.

      TNO connector I've played with, but wasn't convinced yet, as it assumes extremely simple 1-on-1 data transactions which will hardly ever be a real case. The control layer seems ok though.

    1. https://web.archive.org/web/20250810110826/https://gregmorris.co.uk/2024/05/08/exporting-highlights-from.html

      Greg Morris with useful / working description of how to export annotations from my Kobo device (by default, Kobo only syncs annotations from books bought at Kobo platform to your account, not from sideloaded books). Edited the Kobo settings and then was able to export annotations. They do not contain the location for an annotation, so you're referencing is 'blind'. Also mentions a Calibre plugin for annotations I have not tried yet.

    1. Nan Shepherd wrote 'The Living Mountain' in the 1940s, which only got published in 1977. Book was influence on Robert MacFarlane https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Macfarlane_(writer) ([[Landmarks by Robert MacFarlane]] was mentioned in [[Wayfinding by Michael Bond]] and recently 2025 published Is a River Alive ([[Rights of nature - Wikipedia]])? Vgl [[Landschap is medium niet achtergrond 20240731205412]] [[Exploratie zit in onze natuur 20240731202104]]

      [[The Living Mountain by Nan Shepherd]]

    1. Mechanisms of Techno-Moral Change: A Taxonomy and Overview John Danaher & Henrik Skaug Sætra 2023

      The idea that technologies can change moral beliefs and practices is an old one. But how, exactly, does this happen? This paper builds on an emerging field of inquiry by developing a synoptic taxonomy of the mechanisms of techno-moral change. It argues that technology affects moral beliefs and practices in three main domains: decisional (how we make morally loaded decisions), relational (how we relate to others) and perceptual (how we perceive situations). It argues that across these three domains there are six primary mechanisms of techno-moral change: (i) adding options; (ii) changing decision-making costs; (iii) enabling new relationships; (iv) changing the burdens and expectations within relationships; (v) changing the balance of power in relationships; and (vi) changing perception (information, mental models and metaphors). The paper also discusses the layered, interactive and second-order effects of these mechanisms.

      DOI 10.1007/s10677-023-10397-x

      Mechanisms of Techno-moral Change in Zotero PDF

  6. Jul 2025
    1. Vid overall is a bit meh, but the label clarity maximisation is useful to express the difference to productivity aims. Then starts to idealise these types of people as analog first, ruthless curators, and then as cutting out social stuff bc not helping their thinking. That's the meh. Puts purity porn as replacement of productivity porn. Joan Westenberg https://www.joanwestenberg.com/

      Does point to [[Rust is geen restpost 20200531155900]] and reducing friction wrt (creative) thinking, as well as 'output' measured in insights etc not artefacts. Agreed, yet ultimately artefacts are the only output, also of thinking. More like Matuschak , and my k-work artisan approach. (Joan Westenberg posts in a strict rhythm themselves, so do measure artefacts as output too)

      via [[Frank Meeuwsen]] in https://frankmeeuwsen.com/2025/07/28/paper-trails-weekoverzicht-juli.html

    1. https://web.archive.org/web/20250708085929/https://ibestuur.nl/artikel/gemeentelijke-chatbots-arbeidsintensief-en-minder-intelligent-dan-gehoopt/

      iBestuur artikel over Q v chatbots in gem websites. Kort antwoord: waardeloos. Bovendien lijkt het dat iedereen zelf maar wat kiest ipv dat er coord is. Veel gems duren 'experiment' er op te plakken om vervolgens wel de gevolgen daarvan op hun burgers af te wentelen ongevraagd (ergernis, tijdsverlies), en zonder dat er een experiment is in de zin van hypothese empirie en evaluatie

    1. https://web.archive.org/web/20250702121628/https://theecologist.org/2023/nov/01/when-idiot-savants-do-climate-economics

      William Nordhaus is the source of generally accepted modeling of the economic cost of climate urgency and inaction, yet increasingly his models are seen as wildly wrong, not accounting for asymmetric risks and uncertainty (and using GDP as main yardstick it seems). Reads like a linear modeling which disregards cascades and non-linear complex causality chains.

  7. Jun 2025
    1. https://web.archive.org/web/20250630134724/https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/29/ai_agents_fail_a_lot/

      'agent washing' Agentic AI underperforms, getting at most 30% tasks right (Gemini 2.5-Pro) but mostly under 10%.

      Article contains examples of what I think we should agentic hallucination, where not finding a solution, it takes steps to alter reality to fit the solution (e.g. renaming a user so it was the right user to send a message to, as the right user could not be found). Meredith Witthaker is mentioned, but from her statement I saw a key element is missing: most of that access will be in clear text, as models can't do encryption. Meaning not just the model, but the fact of access existing is a major vulnerability.

    1. Mogelijk [[Aan te schaffen boeken 2025]]

      published 2021. "critique of the infosphere"

      Vgl [[Physical and Information Landscape 20060302150900]]

      Byung-Chul Han (1959) https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byung-Chul_Han German university prof. phil. German title: Undinge. Umbrüche der Lebenswelt. Ullstein, Berlin 2021. ISBN 978-3-550-20125-7.

      e-book at Dussmann: https://www.kulturkaufhaus.de/en/detail/ISBN-2244025495146/Han-Byung-Chul/Undinge

      Minima Moralia der Informationsgesellschaft: Heute bewohnen wir nicht mehr Erde und Himmel, sondern Google Earth und Cloud. Informationen beherrschen unsere Lebenswelt. Wir berauschen uns regelrecht an Kommunikation. Byung-Chul Hans Kritik der Informationsgesellschaft klärt uns über die Folgen unseres Informations- und Kommunikationsrausches auf.Schon vor Jahrzehnten stellte der Medientheoretiker Vilém Flusser fest: »Undinge dringen gegenwärtig von allen Seiten in unsere Umwelt, und sie verdrängen die Dinge. Man nennt diese Undinge Informationen.« Die Dinge rücken heute immer mehr in den Hintergrund der Aufmerksamkeit. Die Welt als Infosphäre überlagert die Welt als Dingsphäre. Der Übergang vom Ding zum Unding verändert massiv unsere Wahrnehmung und Weltbeziehung. Byung-Chul Hans neuer Essay kreist um Dinge und Undinge. Er entwickelt sowohl eine Philosophie des Smartphones als auch eine Kritik der Künstlichen Intelligenz aus ungewohnter Perspektive. Gleichzeitig wendet er sich der Magie der Dinge zu und reflektiert über die Stille, die im Informationslärm verlorengeht.

    1. Caesar, L., Sakschewski, B., Anderson, L. S., Beringer, T., Braun, J., Dennis, D., Gerten, A., Heilemann, A., Kaiser, J., Kitzmann, N. H., Loriani, S., Lucht, W., Ludescher, j., Martin, M., Mathesius, S., Paolucci, A., te Wierik, S., & Rockström, J. (2024). Planetary Health Check Report 2024 (1). Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/rest/items/item_30275_5/component/file_30276/content Rockström, J. (2024a). Reflections on the past and future of whole Earth system science. Global Sustainability, 7, e32.

      https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/rest/items/item_30275_5/component/file_30276/content Planetary Health Check Report 2024

    2. Grund für die Nervosität, von der Rockström spricht, sind Entwicklungen der Jahre 2023 und 2024 wie die sprunghafte Erhöhung der Temperaturen der Luft und der Meeresoberfläche und das Umkippen großer Waldgebiete von CO2-Senken zu CO2-Quellen. Was sich gerade im Erdsystem verändert, ist wissenschaftlich noch nicht ganz verstanden. Das Risiko dafür, dass dieses System sich so unwiderruflich von den Holozänbedingungen entfernt, dass sich auch Holozän-ähnliche Bedingungen nicht mehr aufrechterhalten lassen, ist deutlich größer geworden. Ausführlich informiert darüber der „Planetary Health Check Report 2024“ (Caesar et al., 2024), zu dessen Herausgebern Rockström gehört.

      The last 2 yrs saw non-linear changes. While scientifically not yet fully understood, risk for moving out of Holocene conditions became higher.

      Planetary Health Check Report, Caesar et al 2024

    3. Das Konzept der planetary boundaries, das vor allem auf Johan Rockström zurückgeht, integriert die Ergebnisse dieser Forschungen zu einem diagnostischen Framework: Es erlaubt festzustellen, wie groß das Risiko ist, dass das Erdsystem sich unwiderruflich von den Bedingungen des Holozän entfernt.

      Planetary boundaries as a concept mostly coined by Johan Rockström, Heinz says.

      The concept of planetary boundaries is a diagnostic framework for how far / irreparably we're moving out of the Holocene climate conditions.

    4. Johan Rockströms

      Johan Rockström is Director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and Professor in Earth System Science at the University of Potsdam. it says at linked page.

    1. 'It turns out the company had no AI and instead was just a group of Indian developers pretending to write code as AI,

      'AI' softw dev company, is actually a pool of 700 India based coders. Exposed because they couldn't meet payroll....

  8. May 2025
    1. https://web.archive.org/web/20250510102207/https://dougbelshaw.com/blog/2025/05/08/literacy-practices-a-matter-of-community/

      [[Doug Belshaw]] responds to [[Stephen Downes]] wrt literacy and how to see it / define it.

      Belshaw ties literacy to a community of literates, Downes is more focused on literacy as individual skills in reading and writing. Skills are of course individual in principle. Yet there's a diff between rod fishing and reading/writing: rod fishing's personal use value remains flat regardless the number of capable rod fishers, whereas the value of reading/writing increases in a community in which such individual skills have spread. [[Howard Rheingold]] defs literacy as skill+community. [[Geletterdheid als gemeenschappelijke vaardigheid 20100705123145]] Literacy as a communal skill.

      Doug points to [[Etienne Wenger]] 1991 / 1998 work on CoPs. CoPs go further (than a network effect in skill utility spread across a community) in positioning learning and k transfer as embedded in a community of practitioners, and that community being prerequisite for that learning. Wrt literacy this brings on board the cultural existing/evolving practices around literacy, and thus as Doug holds values and ethics.

      My pos thus is a third pos, between Doug and Stephen, closer to Howard's point: the network effect of a skill as determining element if something is a literacy. Reading/writing has a powerful network effect, adding readers/writers increases the agency / utility that reading/writing skills provide. Rod fishing doesn't. Stephen sticks way closer to skills, imo to the point of literacy being just another word for reading/writing skills but not different from skills. Doug goes further than the network effect putting the community more central, which importantly allows to bring the evolution of a literacy over time, contexts and geography in view. Doug and I both see literacy as a social tech. In my take various things called literacy don't much exist perhaps (indiv skills aren't lit, and where spreading those skills doesn't bring much network effect), but there can always be CoP like groupings where social learning around such otherwise indiv skills takes place. The network effect can take place without a CoP too. However the communal layer brings in additional dynamics that will influence lit. As deleniation between communities (of practice and otherwise), or in the form of non-lit people being largely excluded from the community/society they live in.

    1. Probably not, given Google’s long history of interpreting multilingual as serial monolingual (see this 2007 presentation at Google by Stephanie Booth pointing this same stuff out), ignoring that multilingual people tend to change languages throughout their activities even for just a single word or short phrase. (I don’t have Dutch, English or German days or topics, in the case of books I may want to find the German original of an English translation, or want to search for a specific thing in French because I know it exists, while also interested in any Dutch translation that might be available or the Italian original. My notes are always in multiple languages.)

      Multilingualism is never serial monolingual. I use my languages all mixed up, it's a tapestry in which different languages can provide different nuances, associations, emotions. A tapestry. As I wrote here Google has never understood that throughout its history.

  9. Apr 2025
    1. Overview of Rights of Nature, of which Buen Vivir is an expression. parallels in indigenous cultures, religion and human rights law.

      Mentions a range of countries that have them, but doesn't mention legal entity it seems at first glance.

    1. deals encapsulated in the concept of Buen Vivir and the recognition of the rights of Mother Nature draw from ancient Andean indigenous traditions that pre-date the Spanish colonial era.

      Buen vivir ties in with pre-colonial Andean identity aspects, which was a success factor, I suspect as convening call too. Vgl [[SC Identity work 20230907073823]] and [[Convening call 20230908135351]] Bolivia's progress also strongly tied to indigenous population and lifting themselves out of poverty.

    2. Bolivia’s 2011 Law of Mother Nature was the first national-level legislation in the world to bestow rights to the natural world

      Bolivia adopted a 2011 law of mother nature which gives the natural world legal rights.

      • [ ] find that law and what is says
    3. Bolivian Constitution of 2009 recognises Buen Vivir as a principle to guide state action

      Bolivia adopted Buen Vivir in its constitution in 2009 as guiding principle for state policy.