- Jul 2024
-
nation.marketo.com nation.marketo.com
-
it really depends on how the organization's legal counsel interprets the laws and how risk-averse they are. Some organizations might say only Germany requires double opt-in, while others also include Austria and Switzerland. Some organizations might say the US operates under "everyone is opted in until they opt out" while others might say everyone needs to opt in, regardless of country.
.
-
- Jun 2024
-
docdrop.org docdrop.org
-
Those larger goals highlighted edu-cation for good citizenship; to them great books were more of anantidote than a contributor to that bland, conformist mass culturefeared by mid-century critics (left and liberal and conservative) anddescribed by cultural historians.
How, if at all, did the great books idea contribute to the idea of Manufacturing Consent for the 20th century?
-
does the consumer’s integration, by choice, into largermass communities ironically tie the person to new and larger bonds
of conformity, or create new forms of class stratification?
Where does Chomsky's Manufactured Consent fit in here?
-
- May 2024
-
openai.com openai.com
-
We exclude sources we know to have paywalls, primarily aggregate personally identifiable information, have content that violates our policies, or have opted-out.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Mar 2024
-
-
Furthermore, there is compelling evidence that obtaining consent can result in bias, which, in certain circumstances, can affect the outcome of the analysis. Introducing bias into data would not be in the interest of any of the stakeholders.
-
- Dec 2023
-
developers.google.com developers.google.com
-
and pressed the Confirm button to grant consent and share credentials.
-
-
developers.google.com developers.google.com
-
It is generally a best practice to request scopes incrementally, at the time access is required, rather than up front. For example, an app that wants to support saving an event to a calendar should not request Google Calendar access until the user presses the "Add to Calendar" button; see Incremental authorization.
-
After logging in, the user is asked whether they are willing to grant one or more permissions that your application is requesting. This process is called user consent.
-
- Jul 2023
-
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
-
The lawsuit against OpenAI claims the three authors “did not consent to the use of their copyrighted books as training material for ChatGPT. Nonetheless, their copyrighted materials were ingested and used to train ChatGPT.”
-
- Jun 2023
-
developers.google.com developers.google.com
-
Will not read or write first-party [analytics cookies]. Cookieless pings will be sent to Google Analytics for basic measurement and modeling purposes.
-
If a user denies consent, tags no longer store cookies but instead send signals to the Google Server as described in the next section. This prevents the loss of all information about visitors who deny consent and it enables Google Analytics 4 properties to model conversions as described in About modeled conversions.
-
- May 2023
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Cultural hegemony is therefore used to maintain consent to the capitalist order, rather than the use of force to maintain order.
-
- Mar 2023
-
www.mailjet.com www.mailjet.com
-
Send me the Mailjet newsletter. I expressly agree to receive the newsletter and know that I can easily unsubscribe at any time.
-
- Nov 2022
-
Local file Local file
-
Participants must be given an informed consent form and detailed information sheetsthat: are written in a language and in terms they can fully understand describe the aims, methods and implications of the research, the nature of theparticipation and any benefits, risks or discomfort that might ensue explicitly state that participation is voluntary and that anyone has the right torefuse to participate and to withdraw their participation, samples or data atany time — without any consequences state how biological samples and data will be collected, protected during theproject and either destroyed or reused subsequently state what procedures will be implemented in the event of unexpected orincidental findings (in particular, whether the participants have the right toknow, or not to know, about any such findings).
Detalles del consentimiento informado
-
-
www.oscarberg.com www.oscarberg.com
-
This site is making use of some basic analytics cookies so I can hopefully learn something from of the metrics. By using the site you are totally fine with that.
-
-
www.hughrundle.net www.hughrundle.net
-
Nevertheless, the basic principles have mostly held up to now: the culture and technical systems were deliberately designed on principles of consent, agency, and community safety. Whilst there are definitely improvements that could be made to Mastodon in terms of moderation tools and more fine-grained control over posting, in general these are significantly superior to the Twitter experience. It's hardly surprising that the sorts of people who have been targets for harrassment by fascist trolls for most of their lives built in protections against unwanted attention when they created a new social media toolchain.
Agreed, M allows more agency to accountholders. I see how agency and community safety are part of the technical design. What tech / functionality in M is aimed at consent? You can determine the audience for each message more granularly than elsewhere, but that to me is not an implementation of consent, more one of signalling intent.
-
The people re-publishing my Mastodon posts on Twitter didn't think to ask whether I was ok with them doing that. The librarians wondering loudly about how this "new" social media environment could be systematically archived didn't ask anyone whether they want their fediverse posts to be captured and stored by government institutions.
This I think is an unfounded expectation.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Sep 2022
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
if an invitee is invited to do business in a store and is injured snooping around in the private storage area, he does not have invitee status in that area. So if the invitee is snooping around in the dark, trips and falls on something, the land occupier is not liable since the snooper exceeded the consent given him/her
-
- Aug 2022
-
www.bmj.com www.bmj.com
-
Majeed, A., Hodes, S., & Marks, S. (2021). Consent for covid-19 vaccination in children. BMJ, 374, n2356. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2356
-
-
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
-
Adams, R., & editor, R. A. E. (2021, September 15). Covid teams can vaccinate pupils against parents’ wishes, schools told. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2021/sep/15/covid-teams-can-vaccinate-pupils-against-parents-wishes-schools-told
-
- Jul 2022
-
behavioralscientist.org behavioralscientist.org
-
Embracing consent as a core topic in psychology requires starting with a working definition of consent. For that, we can look to legal scholars who have identified three main components of consent: competence (an individual must be capable of consenting), knowledge (an individual must be appropriately informed), and freedom (an individual must agree to something voluntarily).
-
- May 2022
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
It detects bots/spiders and serves them a clean page
Seems like a vulnerability of some sort, though I'm not sure what sort...security/liability?
A user could just set their user agent to be like a bot, and then it would skip the "protections" provided by the cookie consent code?
-
- Apr 2022
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Kit Yates. (2021, September 27). This is absolutely despicable. This bogus “consent form” is being sent to schools and some are unquestioningly sending it out with the real consent form when arranging for vaccination their pupils. Please spread the message and warn other parents to ignore this disinformation. Https://t.co/lHUvraA6Ez [Tweet]. @Kit_Yates_Maths. https://twitter.com/Kit_Yates_Maths/status/1442571448112013319
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
(20) James 💙 Neill—😷 🇪🇺🇮🇪🇬🇧🔶 on Twitter: “The domain sending that fake NHS vaccine consent hoax form to schools has been suspended. Excellent work by @martincampbell2 and fast co-operation by @kualo 👍 FYI @fascinatorfun @Kit_Yates_Maths @dgurdasani1 @AThankless https://t.co/pbAgNfkbEs” / Twitter. (n.d.). Retrieved November 22, 2021, from https://twitter.com/jneill/status/1442784873014566913
-
- Feb 2022
-
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
-
Yang, M. (2022, February 14). Arkansas jail’s ivermectin experiments recall historical medical abuse of imprisoned minorities. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/feb/14/arkansas-prison-covid-19-ivermectin-experiment-minorities-medical-abuse
-
-
edmontonjournal.com edmontonjournal.com
-
Alberta court grants mother right to vaccinate immunocompromised son against COVID-19. (n.d.). Edmontonjournal. Retrieved February 8, 2022, from https://edmontonjournal.com/news/local-news/alberta-court-covid-19-vaccination-rights-mother-immunocompromised-son-despite-father-objection
Tags
- is:news
- vaccine
- consent
- COVID-19
- immunocompromised
- conspiracy theories
- lang:en
- children
- anti-vaccine
- USA
- risk
- misinformation
- authority
Annotators
URL
-
-
osf.io osf.io
-
The paper did not seem to have consent from participants for: (a) Agreeing to participate in the different types of interventions (which have the potential of hurting the health of citizens and could even lead to their death.); (b) using their personal health data to publish a research paper.
Given that the authors are government actors who can easily access millions of citizens and put them in the study groups they desire, without even telling citizens that they are in a study, I worry that this practice will be popularized by governments in Latin America and put citizens in danger.
I also want to note that this is a new type of disinformation where government actors can post content on these repositories and given that most citizens do NOT know it is NOT peer reviewed it can help the government actors to validate their public policy. The research paper becomes political propaganda and the international repository helps to promotes the propaganda.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Oct 2021
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Prof. Gavin Yamey MD MPH. (2021, September 28). Bogus, damaging “consent form” being peddled over in the UK. Ugh. The anti-vaccine movement is trying every grotesque tactic under the sun. [Tweet]. @GYamey. https://twitter.com/GYamey/status/1442821619068686338
-
-
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
-
Adams, R., & editor, R. A. E. (2021, September 15). Covid teams can vaccinate pupils against parents’ wishes, schools told. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2021/sep/15/covid-teams-can-vaccinate-pupils-against-parents-wishes-schools-told
-
- Sep 2021
-
blogs.bmj.com blogs.bmj.com
-
Consent for covid-19 vaccination in children. (2021, September 23). The BMJ. https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/09/23/consent-for-covid-19-vaccination-in-children/
-
- Aug 2021
-
jamanetwork.com jamanetwork.com
-
Morgan, L., Schwartz, J. L., & Sisti, D. A. (2021). COVID-19 Vaccination of Minors Without Parental Consent: Respecting Emerging Autonomy and Advancing Public Health. JAMA Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.1855
-
- Jun 2021
-
www.audienceplay.com www.audienceplay.com
-
CMP or consent management platform is a platform or a tool to take consent from the visitor to use his/her digital identity for marketing efforts.
-
-
- May 2021
-
developer.mozilla.org developer.mozilla.org
-
Allowing users to use the bulk of your service without receiving cookies.
-
-
www.campaignmonitor.com www.campaignmonitor.com
-
At its core, we’re all for this concept. For decades, we’ve preached consent and clear opt-ins as best practices for all email senders.
-
- Apr 2021
-
datatogether.org datatogether.org
-
<small><cite class='h-cite via'>ᔥ <span class='p-author h-card'>Internet Archive</span> in (6) Why Trust A Corporation to Do a Library’s Job? - YouTube (<time class='dt-published'>04/28/2021 11:46:41</time>)</cite></small>
-
- Mar 2021
-
www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.argo.library.okstate.edu www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.argo.library.okstate.edu
-
Reiter, P. L., McRee, A.-L., Pepper, J. K., & Brewer, N. T. (2012). Default Policies and Parents’ Consent for School-Located HPV Vaccination. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 35(6), 651–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-012-9397-1
-
- Nov 2020
-
sveltematerialui.com sveltematerialui.com
-
I agree to the terms and conditions of the software, and hereby sign away my life just to check my freaking messages.
-
- Oct 2020
-
www.collectionscanada.gc.ca www.collectionscanada.gc.ca
-
Some legislation allows for treatment to be given in certain circumstances without the patient's volition. For example, irresponsible people with communicable diseases may be treated against their objection, as in the case of patients with tuberculosis who are noncompliant with treatment. Also, all provinces allow for the involuntary admission of patients to psychiatric facilities, provided they present an immediate risk to themselves or others, or are unable to take care of themselves
These highlight cases where you can treat patients without their consent.
Irresponsible people with communicable diseases (e.g. Tuberculosis)
Psychiatry patients that pose an immediate threat to themselves and/or those around them.
-
-
bookbook.pubpub.org bookbook.pubpub.org
-
and annotation can tell us why that alternative view matters..d-undefined, .lh-undefined { background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2) !important; }.d-undefined, .lh-undefined { background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5) !important; }1Troy Hicks With this potential social function, we are reminded that annotation is not neutral as it helps those who add notes to texts produce new discourses and knowledge.
I wonder how better, big data being overlaid on virtual reality may be helpful to the currently marginalized in the future? Would it be useful to have shared data about businesses and practices that tend to marginalize people further? I recall an African-American comedian recently talking about the Confederate Flag in a (Netflix?) comedy special. They indicated that the flag actually had some worthwhile uses and reminisced driving on rural highways at night looking for a place to stay. When they saw that flag flying over a motel, they knew better to keep driving and stay at another hotel further down the road. In this case, the flag over the hotel not-so-subtly annotated the establishment itself.
I perceive a lot of social slights and institutionalized racism as being of a marginal sort which are designed to be bothersome to some while going wholly unnoticed by others. What if it were possible to aggregate the data on a broader basis to bring these sorts of marginal harms to the forefront for society to see them? As an example, consider big companies doing marginal harms to a community's environment over time, but going generally unnoticed until the company has long since divested and/or disappeared. It's hard to sue them for damages decades later, but if one could aggregate the bigger harms upfront and show those annotated/aggregated data up front, then they could be stopped before they got started.
As a more concrete example, the Trump Management Corporation was hit with a consent decree in the early 1970's for prejudicial practices against people of color including evidence that was subpoenaed showing that applications for people of color were annotated with a big "C" on them. Now consider if all individuals who had made those applications had shared some of their basic data into a pool that could have been accessed and analyzed by future applicants, then perhaps the Trumps would have been caught far earlier. Individuals couldn't easily prove discrimination because of the marginal nature of the discrimination, but data in aggregate could have potentially saved the bigger group.
-
- Sep 2020
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Leicester UCU en Twitter: “Universities are conducting an experiment, an experiment that involves human beings (university staff and students) and a life-threatening virus. But experimental subjects must give informed consent. (That's basic research ethics.)” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved September 26, 2020, from https://twitter.com/leicesterucu/status/1309107917879156737
-
- Jul 2020
-
edpb.europa.eu edpb.europa.eu
-
When downloading a lifestyle mobile app, the app asks for consent to access the phone’saccelerometer. This is not necessary for the app to work, but it is useful for the controller who wishesto learn more about the movements and activity levels of its users. When the user later revokes thatconsent, she finds out that the app now only works to a limited extent. This is an example of detrimentas meant in Recital 42, which means that consent was never validly obtained (and thus, the controllerneeds to delete all personal data about users’ movements collected this way).
-
he GDPR does notpreclude all incentives but the onus would be on the controller to demonstrate that consent was stillfreely given in allthe circumstances.
-
Other examples of detriment are deception, intimidation, coercion or significant negativeconsequences if a data subject does not consent. The controller should be able to prove that the datasubject had a free or genuine choice about whether to consent and that it was possible to withdrawconsent without detriment.
-
Controllers are free to develop methods to comply with this provision in a way that is fitting in theirdaily operations. At the same time, the duty to demonstrate that valid consent has been obtained bya controller, should not in itself lead to excessive amounts of additional data processing. This meansthat controllers should have enough data to show a link to the processing (to show consent wasobtained) but they shouldn’t be collecting any more information than necessary.
-
t is up to the controller to prove that valid consent was obtained from the data subject. The GDPRdoes not prescribe exactly how this must be done. However, the controller must be able to prove thata data subject in a given case has consented. As long as a data processing activity in question lasts, the
-
The EDPBrecommends as a best practice that consent should be refreshed at appropriate intervals.Providing all the information again helps to ensure the data subject remains well informed about howtheir data is being used and how to exercise their rights.
-
Article 7(3) of the GDPR prescribes that the controller must ensure that consent can be withdrawn bythe data subject as easy as giving consent and at any given time. The GDPR does not say that givingand withdrawing consent must always be done through the same action.
-
consent is obtained through use of a service-specific user interface (for example, via a website, an app,a log-on account, the interface of an IoT device or by e-mail), there is no doubt a data subject must beable to withdraw consent via the same electronic interface, as switching to another interface for thesole reason of withdrawing consentwould require undue effort.
-
The controller informs customers that they havethe possibility to withdraw consent. To do this, they could contact a call centre on business daysbetween 8am and 5pm, free of charge. The controller in this example doesnotcomply with article 7(3)of the GDPR. Withdrawing consent in this case requires a telephone call during business hours, this ismore burdensome than the one mouse-click needed for giving consent through the online ticketvendor, which is open 24/7.
-
Controllers have an obligation to delete data that was processed on the basis of consent once thatconsent is withdrawn,assuming that there is no other purpose justifying the continued retention.56Besides this situation, covered in Article 17 (1)(b), an individual data subject may request erasure ofother data concerning him that is processed on another lawful basis, e.g.on the basis of Article6(1)(b).57Controllers are obliged to assess whether continued processing of the data in question isappropriate, even in the absence of an erasure request by the data subject.
-
In cases where the data subject withdraws his/her consent and the controller wishes to continue toprocess the personal data on another lawful basis, they cannot silently migrate from consent (which iswithdrawn) to this other lawful basis. Any change in the lawful basis for processing must be notified toa data subject in accordance with the information requirements in Articles 13 and 14 and under thegeneral principle of transparency.
-
For example, as the GDPR requires that a controller must be able to demonstrate that valid consentwas obtained, all presumed consents of which no references are kept willautomatically be below theconsent standard of the GDPR and will need to be renewed. Likewise as the GDPR requires a“statement or a clear affirmative action”, all presumed consents that were based on a more impliedform of action by the data subject (e.g.a pre-ticked opt-in box) will also not be apt to the GDPRstandard of consent.
-
Also,mechanisms for data subjects to withdraw their consent easily must be available and informationabout how to withdraw consent must be provided.
Tags
- irony
- easy to use
- consent: right to withdraw
- implied consent
- consent: must be freely given
- consent: must be as easy to withdraw/reject as it is to give/accept
- proportionality
- burden of proof
- GDPR
- records/proof of consent
- right to be forgotten
- consent: obtaining renewed consent
- detriment/disadvantage
- consent
- legal grounds for lawful processing of personal data
- consent: updating consent due to adding something new that needs consent
- example
- transparency
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
provide a link or button (e.g. in the footer) that allows your users to reopen the consent modal and edit their preferences.
-
The cookie banner will be displayed any time a user visits your site for the first time or when you have decided to add a new vendor to your list of vendors (since it’s a new disclosure and potentially a consent request for that vendor may be required).
-
In cases where users consent to the use of cookies by your site without opening the advertising preferences dialog, all toggles are set to true and consent is registered for all your selected vendors and purposes listed in the TCF.
-
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
Who needs a cookie consent banner? Any site or app running non-exempt cookies or scripts that could either:
-
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
Perhaps most significantly, these latest guidelines clearly state that Cookie Walls are prohibited and that the EDPB does not consider consent via scrolling or continued browsing to be valid.
-
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
The Cookie Law requires users’ informed consent before storing cookies on a user’s device and/or tracking them. This means that if your site/app (or any third-party service used by your site/app) uses cookies, you must: inform users about your data collection activities;give them the option to choose whether it’s allowed or not; obtain informed consent prior to the installation of those cookies.
-
-
www.somanyofus.com www.somanyofus.com
-
bugs.ruby-lang.org bugs.ruby-lang.org
-
I have pixelized the faces of the recognizable people wearing a red cord (as they don't want to appear on pictures). I hope is fine.
-
-
arxiv.org arxiv.org
-
Lovato, J., Allard, A., Harp, R., & Hébert-Dufresne, L. (2020). Distributed consent and its impact on privacy and observability in social networks. ArXiv:2006.16140 [Physics]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.16140
-
- May 2020
-
leedsunilibrary.wordpress.com leedsunilibrary.wordpress.com
-
The Ethics of Online Research. (2018, August 30). Leeds University Library Blog. https://leedsunilibrary.wordpress.com/2018/08/30/the-ethics-of-online-research/
-
-
-
Now you can use Google Analytics without annoying Cookie Notices.
-
-
www.analyticsmania.com www.analyticsmania.com
-
To be fully compliant with GDPR, you would also need to enable Show Reject All Button setting.
-
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
Organizations must be transparent on the purpose of the data collection and consent must be “explicit and freely given”. This means that the mechanism for acquiring consent must be unambiguous and involve a clear “opt-in” action (the regulation specifically forbids pre-ticked boxes and similar “opt-out” mechanisms)
-
In order to comply with privacy laws, especially the GDPR, companies need to store proof of consent so that they can demonstrate that consent was collected. These records must show: when consent was provided;who provided the consent;what their preferences were at the time of the collection;which legal or privacy notice they were presented with at the time of the consent collection;which consent collection form they were presented with at the time of the collection.
-
Because consent under the GDPR is such an important issue, it’s mandatory that you keep clear records and that you’re able to demonstrate that the user has given consent; should problems arise, the burden of proof lies with the data controller, so keeping accurate records is vital.
-
Keeping comprehensive records that include a user ID and the data submitted together with a timestamp. You also keep a copy of the version of the data-capture form and any other relevant documents in use on that date.
-
-
ico.org.uk ico.org.ukHome1
-
www.civicuk.com www.civicuk.com
-
With a recognisable, ever present icon, user's can easily manage their consent at any time.
-
Cookie Control aims to prevent cookies from being placed on a user's computer until they have given their explicit consent via an affirmative act.
-
With Cookie Control you can customise your cookie categories and ensure your users can always make an informed decision.
-
-
-
app.termly.io app.termly.ioTermly1
-
eugdprcompliant.com eugdprcompliant.com
-
Many also question how the average user with little knowledge of the GDPR will react to being asked so many questions regarding consent. Will they be confused? Probably at first. It will be up to each business to create a consent form that is easy to understand, while being at the same time comprehensive and informative
-
Like all other consent under the GDPR, consenting to cookies needs to be a clear affirmative action. An example is clicking through an opt-in box or choosing settings from the menu. Pay attention to not have pre-ticked boxes on the consent form!
-
-
iapp.org iapp.org
-
The GDPR requires consent to be opt-in. It defines consent as “freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous” given by a “clear affirmative action.” It is not acceptable to assign consent through the data subject’s silence or by supplying “pre-ticked boxes.”
-
-
weather.com weather.com
-
These options have almost deceptively similar wordings, with only subtle difference that is too hard to spot at a glance (takes detailed comparison, which is fatiguing for a user):
- can use your browser’s information for providing advertising services for this website and for their own purposes.
- cannot use your browser’s information for purposes other than providing advertising services for this website.
If you rewrite them to use consistent, easy-to-compare wording, then you can see the difference a little easier:
- can use your browser’s information for providing advertising services for this website and for their own purposes.
- can use your browser’s information for providing advertising services for this website <del>and for their own purposes</del>.
Standard Advertising Settings
This means our ad partners can use your browser’s information for providing advertising services for this website and for their own purposes.
Do Not Share My Information other than for ads on this website
This means that our ad partners cannot use your browser’s information for purposes other than providing advertising services for this website.
-
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
The iubenda Cookie Solution features a JS API for easy interaction with some of its main functions.
-
In particular, if you set this parameter to true, our solution creates a technical cookie on iubenda.com (domain) which is used when the cookie on the local domain is not found.
-
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
Consent means offering individuals real choice and control. Genuine consent should put individuals in charge, build trust and engagement, and enhance your reputation.
-
-
support.iubenda.com support.iubenda.com
-
By bundling AddThis with other Experience enhancement cookies, it makes it impossible to opt in to other Experience enhancement cookies without also opting in to these (what could also be categorized as) Targeting/Advertising cookies (id 5).
-
-
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
In practice, the TCF provides a standardized process for getting users’ informed consent and allows the seamless signaling of users’ s consent preferences across the advertising supply chain.
-
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
Sure, anti-spam measures such as a CAPTCHA would certainly fall under "legitimate interests". But would targeting cookies? The gotcha with reCAPTCHA is that this legitimate-interest, quite-necessary-in-today's-world feature is inextricably bundled with unwanted and unrelated Google targeting (cookiepedia.co.uk/cookies/NID) cookies (_ga, _gid for v2; NID for v3).
-
Many 3rd parties has some magic parameter which blocks the cookie, but doesn't block the functionality of the element, and I'm looking for something like that. For example brightcove player has a data attribute. Video is working, cookies are not set.
-
-
complianz.io complianz.io
-
This form uses ReCaptcha. Before sending the form, please accept cookies before sending the form
-
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
Explicit Form (where the purpose of the sign-up mechanism is unequivocal). So for example, in a scenario where your site has a pop-up window that invites users to sign up to your newsletter using a clear phrase such as: “Subscribe to our newsletter for access to discount vouchers and product updates!“, the affirmative action that the user performs by typing in their email address would be considered valid consent.
Answers the question I had above: https://hyp.is/tpgdQo_4EeqPcm-PI0G2jA/www.iubenda.com/en/help/5640-email-newsletter-compliance-guide
-
Make it clear that signing up is optional. Consent must be “freely given”; you may not coerce users into joining your mailing list or make it appear as if joining the list is mandatory. For this reason, you must make it clear that signing up is optional. This is especially relevant in cases where you offer free white-papers (or e-books) for download. While the user’s email address is required for the delivery of the service, signing up for your newsletter is not. In such a case, you must not make it appear as if signing-up to the newsletter list mandatory and must make it clear that it is optional.
Question (answer below)
Are they saying that it's not allowed to make signing up for a mailing list a precondition/requirement for anything? This was surprising to me.
So if you have a newsletter sign-up page that sends a digital bonus gift (like an e-book) to new subscribers, are required to completely change/repurpose your "newsletter sign-up page" into a "download e-book page" (that has an optional checkbox to also sign up for the newsletter, if you want)? That seems dumb to me, since it requires completely reversing the purpose of the page — which was, in my mind, primarily about signing up for the newsletter, with a bonus (an essentially optional one) thrown in for those who do so. Are you required to either repurpose it like that or remove the free bonus offer that would be sent to new subscribers?
The irony of this is that it requires websites that have a newsletter sign-up page like that to change it into a "newsletter sign-up page" where the newsletter sign-up part is optional. Which make you look kind of stupid, making a page that claims to be one thing but doesn't necessarily do what it says it's for.
Does this mean, in effect, that you may not lawfully provide any sort of incentive or reward for signing up for something (like a mailing list)? As long as it's very clear that some action is required before delivery of some thing, I don't see why this sort of thing should not be permitted? Would this fall under contract law? And as such, wouldn't such a contract be allowed and valid? Are mailing lists a special class of [service] that has special requirements like this? Or is it part of a broader category to which this requirement applies more generally?
Why is requiring the user to provide an email address before they can download a digital reward allowed but not requiring signing up to a mailing list? Why isn't it required that even the email address be optional to provide? (To answer my own question, probably because it's allowed to allow a user to request a specific thing to be sent via email, and an email address is required in order to fulfill that request. But...) It seems that the website could just provide a direct link to download it via HTTP/FTP/etc. as an option for users that chose not to provide an email address. (But should they be required to provide that option anytime they / just because they provide the option to have the same thing delivered via email?)
Answer
Looks like my question was answered below:
Explicit Form (where the purpose of the sign-up mechanism is unequivocal). So for example, in a scenario where your site has a pop-up window that invites users to sign up to your newsletter using a clear phrase such as: “Subscribe to our newsletter for access to discount vouchers and product updates!“, the affirmative action that the user performs by typing in their email address would be considered valid consent.
So the case I described, where it is made very clear that the incentive that is offered is conditional on subscribing, is listed as an exception to the general rule. That's good; it should be allowed.
-
there’s no need to send consent request emails — provided that this basis of processing was stated in your privacy policy and that users had easy access to the notice prior to you processing their data. If this information was not available to users at the time, but one of these legal bases can currently legitimately apply to your situation, then your best bet would be to ensure that your current privacy notice meets requirements, so that you can continue to process your user data in a legally compliant way.
-
Here’s why sending GDPR consent emails is tricky and should be handled very carefully.
-
In cases where you want to send more than one type of email to your users, you’re required to get additional consent specific to those uses as you must have multiple consents for multiple purposes.
-
In the case of DEM communications, you must obtain additional consent if also sending emails about third-party products/services in addition to your own.
-
Under the FTC’s CAN-SPAM Act, you do not need consent prior to adding users located in the US to your mailing list or sending them commercial messages, however, it is mandatory that you provide users with a clear means of opting out of further contact.
Tags
- irony
- personal data processing: consent not needed
- US law
- implicit/implied
- exemptions
- question with answer
- consent: must be freely given
- exceptions to the rule
- being explicit
- GDPR
- consent: may not be bundled
- unfortunate policies/laws
- consent
- I have a question about this
- opting out
- mailing list
- right to object/opt out
- spam
- consent: validity of consent
- unreasonable
Annotators
URL
-
-
github.com github.com
-
github.com github.com
-
-
To ensure that this information is conveyed in a manner that remains clear, concise and not unnecessarily disruptive, the use of layered and just-in-time notices should be favored. However, it is important to note that the initial layer contain all of the key information needed for there to be an informed choice.
-
Consent receipt mechanisms can be especially helpful in automatically generating such records.
-
it has been inferred by many that the validity of consent could degrade over time
-
make it as easy to withdraw consent as to give it. The latter gets particularly interesting when considering that in some contexts, consent may be obtained “through only one mouse-click, swipe or keystroke” and therefore “data subjects must, in practice, be able to withdraw that consent equally as easily” per the WP29.
It seems, then, that one should be careful to not make it too easy to opt in to something unless you are prepared to accept the liability for making it just as easy to opt out (which may be technically challenging).
-
it is a question of balance — if one mouse-click was all it took to consent, is it appropriate to require a phone call during business hours to withdraw that consent? Probably not.
-
you may consider using tools that provide visibility into your organization’s various processing activities and how they change over time, allow for reminders to be set for refreshing consent at regular intervals, and that provide data subjects with the ability to directly control their consent preferences.
-
Where a processing activity is necessary for the performance of a contract.
Would a terms of service agreement be considered a contract in this case? So can you just make your terms of service basically include consent or implied consent?
-
“Is consent really the most appropriate legal basis for this processing activity?” It should be taken into account that consent may not be the best choice in the following situations:
Tags
- personal data processing: consent not needed
- consent: right to withdraw
- legal grounds for lawful processing of personal data
- consent
- appropriateness
- personal data processing
- technically challenging
- unintended consequence
- balance
- contract law
- liability
- consent: validity of consent
- personal data processing: record-keeping
- consent receipt
Annotators
URL
-
-
api.consentreceipt.org api.consentreceipt.org
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
kantarainitiative.org kantarainitiative.org
-
“Until CR 1.0 there was no effective privacy standard or requirement for recording consent in a common format and providing people with a receipt they can reuse for data rights. Individuals could not track their consents or monitor how their information was processed or know who to hold accountable in the event of a breach of their privacy,” said Colin Wallis, executive director, Kantara Initiative. “CR 1.0 changes the game. A consent receipt promises to put the power back into the hands of the individual and, together with its supporting API — the consent receipt generator — is an innovative mechanism for businesses to comply with upcoming GDPR requirements. For the first time individuals and organizations will be able to maintain and manage permissions for personal data.”
-
CR 1.0 is an essential specification for meeting the proof of consent requirements of GDPR to enable international transfer of personal information in a number of applications.
-
Much like a retailer giving a customer a cash register receipt as a personal record of a purchase transaction, an organization using CR 1.0 will create a record of a consent transaction and give it to the individual. This transaction record is called a consent receipt.
-
CR 1.0 can be used by people to communicate consent and the sharing of personal information once it is provided.
-
Its purpose is to decrease the reliance on privacy policies and enhance the ability for people to share and control personal information.
-
-
Kantara’s CR 1.0 specification provides a common standard digital format for providing a record to consumers about privacy and what people have consented to. The creation and implementation of this standardized format will promote consistent, machine and human understandable consent practices, support consent management interoperability between systems internationally and enable proof of scalable consent.
Tags
- standard
- empowering people to control their privacy / personal data processing
- data interchange
- innovative
- empowering individual users
- communication
- specification
- analogy
- accountability
- open format
- compliance
- key point
- open protocols
- personal data processing: record-keeping
- consent receipt
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
It’s useful to remember that under GDPR regulations consent is not the ONLY reason that an organization can process user data; it is only one of the “Lawful Bases”, therefore companies can apply other lawful (within the scope of GDPR) bases for data processing activity. However, there will always be data processing activities where consent is the only or best option.
-
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
Under the FTC’s CAN-SPAM Act, you do not need consent prior to adding users located in the US to your mailing list or sending them commercial messages, however, it is mandatory that you provide users with a clear means of opting out of further contact.
-
Under EU law (namely the GDPR) it is mandatory that you obtain the informed consent of the user before subscribing them to the service. Under EU regulations, acquiring consent can be considered a two-part process that includes informing the user and obtaining verifiable consent via an affirmative action.
-
The banner is not necessarily required in this specific instance if the cookie policy is easily accessible and visible from every page of the site.
-
A real-world example of this would be an e-commerce site that allows users to “hold” items in their cart while they’re using the site or for the duration of a session. In this scenario, the technical cookies are both necessary for the functioning of the purchasing service and are explicitly requested by the user when they indicate that they would like to add the item to the cart. Do note, however, that these session-based technical cookies are not tracking cookies.
I'm not sure I agree with this:
[the technical cookies] are explicitly requested by the user when they indicate that they would like to add the item to the cart.
The only thing they requested was that the item be held in a cart for them. They didn't explicitly request that cookies be used to store information about items in the cart. They most likely don't understand all of the options for how to store data like this, and certainly wouldn't know or expect specifically that cookies be used for this.
In fact, localStorage could be used instead. If it's a single-page app, then even that would be necessary; it could all be kept in page-local variables until they checked out (all on the same page); such that reloading the page would cause the cart data held in those variables to be lost.
-
Consent to cookies can be provided by several actions. Subject to the local authority, these actions may include continued browsing, clicking on links or scrolling the page. In many cases, clicking on “ok”, closing the banner or continued navigation of a cookie-installing website can be considered active consent to the placing of cookies — provided that users had been previously and clearly informed about this consequence.
-
The question is: do you have to treat the consent to the use of cookies the same way as the “regular” consent to specific data processing activities e.g. sending out newsletters?
-
-
www.fieldfisher.com www.fieldfisher.com
-
I noticed that some cookies were set prior to clicking Reject All. Then after reloading the page, those cookies went away.
-
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
Finally, if none of the above-mentioned options seems viable, you have to collect your Users’ consent to transfer their data outside of the EU. This is the most complicated scenario, because you have to make sure that their consent is – among other aspects – “informed”. Do you really know what is going to happen to User data once they are exported outside the EU? Can you tell, what kind of security measures are being provided by the local legislation or adopted at the data importer’s initiative to ensure protection of personal data? If you’re able to provide such information, you may ask your Users to consent to the transfer of personal data, but if you’re not able to provide it, be careful: any consent collected would not be considered “informed” and therefore void.
-
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
Implementing prior blocking and asynchronous re-activation Our prior blocking option prevents the installation of non-exempt cookies before user consent is obtained (as required by EU law) and asynchronously activates (without reloading the page) the scripts after the user consents.To use, you must first enable this feature: simply select the “Prior blocking and asynchronous re-activation” checkbox above before copy and pasting the code snippet into the HEAD as mentioned in the preceding paragraph.
-
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
However, please note the following: it will depend on how those subdomains are defined. Are they just subsections of a project that belongs together like help.example.com or blog.example.com (and many other possible arrangements that are part of one and the same setup)? In such a case, using the same policy is appropriate. Problems arise when completely different projects which have little to do with one another and whose data collection practices also differ so significantly that they require different privacy policies.
-
- Apr 2020
-
www.cnbc.com www.cnbc.com
-
For instance, one recent blog entry from the Irish Data Protection Commission discussing events at schools borders on the absurd:“Take the scenario whereby a school wants to take and publish photos at a sports day – schools could inform parents in advance that photographs are going to be taken at this event and could provide different-coloured stickers for the children to wear to signify whether or not they can be photographed,” the Commission suggested. The post goes on to discuss the possibility of schools banning photographs at a high school musical, but suggests that might be unwieldy.
-
“In the end, GDPR is all about consent and it’s an approach to privacy that is very European,” said Kagan. “That’s not a mistake. It’s a values statement.”
-
The actual process is something we still need to work on so we don’t get consent fatigue.
-
It would be a full-time job to protect your privacy in a notice and consent model.”
-
Among some consumers, GDPR is perhaps best known as a bothersome series of rapid-fire, pop-up privacy notices.
-
consumers become blind to an avalanche of privacy pop-up notices
-
-
-
iapp.org iapp.org
-
Currently, there is a high frequency of consent requests, privacy notices, cookie banners or cookie policies on every visited website. As a consequence of consent abuse, individuals resent a fatigue, resulting in consent loosing its purpose.
-
This way, personal data is more effectively protected allowing individuals to focus on the risk involved in granting authorization for the use of their personal data and to take appropriate decisions based on the risk assessment. Consequently, the burden and confusion generated by systematic consent forms is constrained.
Speaking of confusing, this paragraph is confusing and unclear.
I think what they're basically saying is, don't ask for consent for every single little thing; only ask for consent when there is a real risk involved, so that people don't get desensitized to you asking for consent for every little thing, even things that they probably don't care about.
Key word:
systematic consents
-
Third, the focus should be centered on improving transparency rather than requesting systematic consents. Lack of transparency and clarity doesn’t allow informed and unambiguous consent (in particular, where privacy policies are lengthy, complex, vague and difficult to navigate). This ambiguity creates a risk of invalidating the consent.
systematic consents
-
If the PIA identifies risks or high risks, based on the specific context and circumstances, the organization will need to request consent.
-
U.K. Information Commissioner Elizabeth Denham clearly states that consent is not the "silver bullet" for GDPR compliance. In many instances, consent will not be the most appropriate ground — for example, when the processing is based on a legal obligation or when the organization has a legitimate interest in processing personal data.
-
data processing limited to purposes deemed reasonable and appropriate such as commercial interests, individual interests or societal benefits with minimal privacy impact could be exempt from formal consent. The individual will always retain the right to object to the processing of any personal data at any time, subject to legal or contractual restrictions.
-
organizations may require consent from individuals where the processing of personal data is likely to result in a risk or high risk to the rights and freedoms of individuals or in the case of automated individual decision-making and profiling. Formal consent could as well be justified where the processing requires sharing of personal data with third parties, international data transfers, or where the organization processes special categories of personal data or personal data from minors.
-
This will avoid overburdening with too much information every time they access a website, navigate across the internet, download an application, or purchase goods and/or services. This may result in a certain degree of consent fatigue.
-
Furthermore, the consent-based regime creates an obligation to document that consent was lawfully given.
-
the French CNIL has reminded that consent has to be given at the time of data collection, has to be specific, and cannot be passed to another controller through a contractual relationship; it could not be bundled.
Tags
- records/proof of consent
- personal data processing: consent not needed
- terms of service/policy documents that people never read
- legal grounds for lawful processing of personal data
- fatigue
- confusing
- ambiguity
- desensitized
- personal data processing: consent
- legal grounds for lawful processing of personal data: legitimate interests
- consent fatigue
- GDPR
- clarity
- consent: may not be bundled
- transparency
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
Allows you to autodetect and limit prior-blocking and cookie consent requests only to users from the EU – where this is a legal requirement – while running cookies scripts normally in regions where you are still legally allowed to do so.
-
Enables the blocking of scripts and their reactivation only after having collected user consent. If false, the blocked scripts are always reactivated regardless of whether or not consent has been provided (useful for testing purposes, or when you’re working on your project locally and don’t want pageviews to be counted). We strongly advise against setting "priorConsent":false if you need to comply with EU legislation. Please note that if the prior blocking setting has been disabled server side (via the checkbox on the flow page), this parameter will be ineffective whether it’s set to true or false.
-
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
Strictly necessary (id 1). Purposes included:Backup saving and managementHosting and backend infrastructureManaging landing and invitation pagesPlatform services and hostingSPAM protectionTraffic optimization and distributionInfrastructure monitoringHandling payments
-
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
Please note that at the moment the Cookie Solution is optimized to comply with very strict Italian implementation regulations (this can only improve compliance in other jurisdictions).
-
-
designmuseum.org designmuseum.org
-
You can change your browser settings to refuse cookies and delete them at any time. If you continue to use this site without taking action to prevent the storage of this information, you are effectively agreeing to this use.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
keepass.info keepass.info
-
The collection of the data for the provision of the website and the storage of the data in log files is absolutely necessary for the operation of the website. Consequently, there is no possibility of objection on the part of the user.
-
-
-
Google's move to release location data highlights concerns around privacy. According to Mark Skilton, director of the Artificial Intelligence Innovation Network at Warwick Business School in the UK, Google's decision to use public data "raises a key conflict between the need for mass surveillance to effectively combat the spread of coronavirus and the issues of confidentiality, privacy, and consent concerning any data obtained."
-
- Mar 2020
-
piwik.pro piwik.pro
-
See a full history of user consents and data requests. Use the records to prove your compliance in case of an audit by data protection authorities.
-
Prevent your tags from running before you obtain a legal consent.
-
-
-
www.cmswire.com www.cmswire.com
-
One MailChimp user tweeted this week that it seems the EU has "effectively killed newsletter with GDPR." He said he sent "get consent" emails through MailChimp and reported these numbers: 100 percent delivery rate, 37 percent open rate, 0 percent given consent.
-
The re-consent campaigns have also been recognized as a practical pain from some in the thick of it. It's causing angst amongst email weary customers and prospects, consent fatigue and even some legal issues
-
“But, if you’re unsure or haven’t mapped out entirely your processing activities,” he said, “it’s impossible to accurately reflect what your users or clients are consenting to when they complete a consent request.”
-
“It is unfortunate that a lot of companies are blindly asking for consent when they don’t need it because they have either historically obtained the consent to contact a user,” said digital policy consultant Kristina Podnar. “Or better yet, the company has a lawful basis for contact. Lawful basis is always preferable to consent, so I am uncertain why companies are blindly dismissing that path in favor of consent.”
-
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
Practical examples Below are examples of commonly used scripts and guidance on how to modify them as to comply with cookie law.
-
If other third-party tools guarantee not to use cookies, perhaps by providing specific configuration options, they too can be considered to be exempt from prior blocking. This is the case namely with YouTube, which provides a specific feature to prevent the user from being tracked through cookies.
-
This depends on the legal jurisdiction applicable to your site. In Europe, you’re legally required to block cookie scripts until user consent is obtained. All cookies must be blocked except for those that are exempt.
-
Technical cookies, preference, session and optimization cookies
-
-
-
These records should include a userid, timestamp, consent proof, record of the consenting action, and the legal documents available to the user at the time of consent, among other things.
-
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
Now, if you intend to serve personalized ads to users, you’ll need to ensure that explicit consent to ad personalisation is collected before you can display personalised ads for end-users (where this consent is not collected, Google will default to serving non-personalized ads, potentially impacting your ad revenue).
-
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
Some cookies are exempted from prior consent and therefore do not require compliance with the instructions contained in this guide
-
Technical cookies, i.e. those needed to provide the service. These include preference cookies, session cookies, load balancing cookies etc.
-
-
-
github.com github.com
-
-
to be fully compliant, this leads to having to check for consent on every request server-side, which is not cacheable/scalable at all. Maybe having caches vary on consent-related properties of a request would solve that, but not without an explosion in cache storage requirements (if nothing else) and nightmares when it comes to cache invalidation(s).
-
To complicate things further, if you classify your social-sharing-plugins-usage as required functionality, and those need to set their own 3rd party cookies (as they themselves classify those as required), hello to 3rd party cookies being set by default and no way for users to opt-out (except by turning them off via browser, which means the whole thing is redundant, might as well just instruct users to disable third party cookies if they don't want to participate in social sharing crap?)
-
this website claims the cookie stuff will be a responsibility of the browser, not the website, which would make live easier for web devs.
-
-
clearcode.cc clearcode.cc
-
An example of an extended consent form that allows users to give consent in a more granular manner – i.e. selectively for a number of processing purposes (analytics, remarketing or content personalization)
-
A single consent form is useful when consent is requested for a single purpose. Here: analytics
This seems like an important distinction:  Probably (?) you can only use a simple Agree/Disagree consent request if you only have a single purpose/category that you are obtaining consent for.
As soon as your site has multiple categories to need consent, then you must allow individual consent/refusal of consent for each individual category/purpose.
This is alluded to just a little bit further on:
Consent should also be granular; users must be allowed to selectively decide what types of tracking, analytics and other activities their data can be used for.
-
Asking for consent when processing users’ personal data is one of the most important duties imposed on website owners by the GDPR.
-
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
This option is particularly relevant to users who operate in the UK as the ICO now requires that a reject button be displayed.
-
-
www.iubenda.com www.iubenda.com
-
Websites should not make conditional “general access” to the site on acceptance of all cookies but can only limit certain content if the user does not consent to cookies.
-
it would appear impossible to require a publisher to provide information on and obtain consent for the installation of cookies on his own website also with regard to those installed by “third parties**”
-
Our solution goes a bit further than this by pointing to the browser options, third-party tools and by linking to the third party providers, who are ultimately responsible for managing the opt-out for their own tracking tools.
-
This means or mechanism does not have to be hosted directly by you. In most cases under member state law, browser settings are considered to be an acceptable means of withdrawing consent.
-
It’s worth noting here that the Italian Data Protection Authority (the Garante Privacy) specifically recognizes “performing a scrolling action” and “clicking on one of the internal links of the page” as valid indications of affirmative consent. Italy’s electronic data laws are fairly robust so in all likelihood, it should be fine to apply this, but because the ePrivacy is, in fact, a Directive, the specifics of how requirements should be met are heavily dependent on individual Member State law. For this reason, we give you the option to easily disable the Cookie Solution’s “scroll to consent” feature should the particular Member State law require it.
Interesting. Most things I've read seem to suggest that wouldn't be sufficient action to imply consent.
-
The exemption to the consent requirement only clearly applies to non-tracking technical cookies strictly necessary for the functioning of services that were expressly requested by the user. A real-world example of this would be an e-commerce site that allows users to “hold” items in their cart while they’re using the site or for the duration of a session. In this scenario, the technical cookies are both necessary for the functioning of the purchasing service and are explicitly requested by the user when they indicate that they would like to add the item to the cart.
-
these active behaviors may include continued browsing, clicking, scrolling the page or some method that requires the user to actively proceed; this is somewhat left up to your discretion. Some website/app owners may favor a click-to-consent method over scrolling/continued-browsing methods as the former is less likely to be performed by user error.
-
This means that if your site/app (or any third-party service used by your site/app) uses cookies, you must inform users about your data collection activities and give them the option to choose whether it’s allowed or not; you must obtain informed consent prior to the installation of those cookies.
-
Prior to consent, no cookies — except for exempt cookies — can be installed
-
-
techcrunch.com techcrunch.com
-
illustrates the extent to which illegal practices prevail, with vendors of CMPs turning a blind eye to — or worse, incentivising — clearly illegal configurations of their systems
-
-
techcrunch.com techcrunch.com
-
www.privacypolicies.com www.privacypolicies.com
-
On the other hand, providing your customers with a customized user experience or tailored product suggestions is not a requirement for an online store, and cookies that enable these features do not fall under the "strictly necessary" category. You'll need to get consent before you use them.
-
When you visit your favorite online store, you expect the items you add to your shopping cart to still be in your shopping cart when you check out. Cookies make that happen. If you opted out of those cookies, you would, in essence, be opting out of the very reason you went to that site in the first place. Asking a customer if they want to allow cookies to make their shopping cart work would be like asking them if they want the thread to keep their shirt together.
-
In fact, some are essential for the proper functioning of a website. The EU understands this and makes an exception for cookies that are "strictly necessary" to fulfill the services requested by your site visitors.
-
-
usercentrics.com usercentrics.com
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.jeffalytics.com www.jeffalytics.com
-
Decision point #2 – Do you send any data to third parties, directly or inadvertently? <img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-10174" src="https://www.jeffalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/7deb832d95678dc21cc23208d76f4144_Flowchart.png" alt="GDPR cookie consent flowchart" width="1451" height="601" srcset="https://www.jeffalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/7deb832d95678dc21cc23208d76f4144_Flowchart.png 1451w, https://www.jeffalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/7deb832d95678dc21cc23208d76f4144_Flowchart-300x124.png 300w, https://www.jeffalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/7deb832d95678dc21cc23208d76f4144_Flowchart-981x406.png 981w, https://www.jeffalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/7deb832d95678dc21cc23208d76f4144_Flowchart-761x315.png 761w, https://www.jeffalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/7deb832d95678dc21cc23208d76f4144_Flowchart-611x253.png 611w, https://www.jeffalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/7deb832d95678dc21cc23208d76f4144_Flowchart-386x160.png 386w, https://www.jeffalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/7deb832d95678dc21cc23208d76f4144_Flowchart-283x117.png 283w, https://www.jeffalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/7deb832d95678dc21cc23208d76f4144_Flowchart-600x249.png 600w, https://www.jeffalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/7deb832d95678dc21cc23208d76f4144_Flowchart-1024x424.png 1024w, https://www.jeffalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/7deb832d95678dc21cc23208d76f4144_Flowchart-50x21.png 50w, https://www.jeffalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/7deb832d95678dc21cc23208d76f4144_Flowchart-250x104.png 250w, https://www.jeffalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/7deb832d95678dc21cc23208d76f4144_Flowchart-241x100.png 241w, https://www.jeffalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/7deb832d95678dc21cc23208d76f4144_Flowchart-400x166.png 400w, https://www.jeffalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/7deb832d95678dc21cc23208d76f4144_Flowchart-350x145.png 350w, https://www.jeffalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/7deb832d95678dc21cc23208d76f4144_Flowchart-840x348.png 840w, https://www.jeffalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/7deb832d95678dc21cc23208d76f4144_Flowchart-860x356.png 860w, https://www.jeffalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/7deb832d95678dc21cc23208d76f4144_Flowchart-1030x427.png 1030w" sizes="(max-width: 1451px) 100vw, 1451px" /> Remember, inadvertently transmitting data to third parties can occur through the plugins you use on your website. You don't necessarily have to be doing this proactively. If the answer is “Yes,” then to comply with GDPR, you should use a cookie consent popup.
-
-
www.google.com www.google.com
-
If your agreement with Google incorporates this policy, or you otherwise use a Google product that incorporates this policy, you must ensure that certain disclosures are given to, and consents obtained from, end users in the European Economic Area along with the UK. If you fail to comply with this policy, we may limit or suspend your use of the Google product and/or terminate your agreement.
-
-
gdpr-info.eu gdpr-info.eu
-
the performance of a contract may not be made dependent upon the consent to process further personal data, which is not needed for the performance of that contract
-
-
www.adrianjock.com www.adrianjock.com
-
The cookies that are non-essential will be sent to the browsers only if the visitors accept them.
-
So if they choose to play the video, do they get some other prompt to accept cookies from YouTube BEFORE the video will play?
-
-
policies.google.com policies.google.com
-
Most Google users will have a preferences cookie called ‘NID’ in their browsers. A browser sends this cookie with requests to Google’s sites. The NID cookie contains a unique ID Google uses to remember your preferences and other information, such as your preferred language (e.g. English), how many search results you wish to have shown per page (e.g. 10 or 20), and whether or not you wish to have Google’s SafeSearch filter turned on.
They seem to claim (or hope that their description will make you think) that ‘NID’ is only used for storing preferences, but if you read further down, you see that it's also used for targeting.
These should be separate cookies since they have separate purposes, and since under GPDR we have to get separate consent for each purpose of cookie.
-
-
www.quora.com www.quora.com
-
YouTube’s privacy-enhanced mode basically means they do not store visitor’s information if you have a YouTube video on your website, unless they actually click on the video to view it.
-
-
www.guidingtech.com www.guidingtech.com
-
The problem is that even if the visitor is not watching the video or interacting with it, in any capacity, YouTube still collects and stores data on them. Not cool.This is done using cookies that are placed on the user’s browser the moment they load a webpage with a YouTube video embedded in it. These cookies are used to track users, serve targeted ads (Google’s bread and butter), and add info to user’s profile. Yes, they have profiles on everyone.
-