592 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2022
  2. Sep 2022
  3. Feb 2022
  4. Jan 2022
  5. Dec 2021
  6. Nov 2021
  7. Aug 2021
  8. Jul 2021
  9. Jun 2021
  10. Oct 2020
  11. Jul 2020
  12. May 2020
  13. Jan 2020
  14. Nov 2019
  15. Jul 2019
  16. May 2019
  17. Feb 2019
  18. Jan 2019
  19. Dec 2018
  20. Nov 2018
  21. Oct 2018
  22. Sep 2018
    1. motifs without any hits in the supplied sequencesand motifs mapping to transcription factors with low expression(default threshold: 1 normalized read per kilobase) are remove

      sensible

    1. Unlike simple k-mer searching, these methods were designed to predict individual RBP binding sites. They go beyond the motif content alone, for instance by taking into account site accessibility (Li et al. 2010; Zhang et al. 2013) or clustering (Akerman et al. 2009; Zhang et al. 2013).

      Suggests that RBPmap is a good choice, provided one uses the weighted rank score accounting for clustering and the conservation filter. mCarts by Zhang et al. applied to the ENCODE CLIP data would complement RBPmap, but what would be even better is if ENCODE had already applied it to their data and can provide the binding site predictions.

  23. Aug 2018
  24. Jul 2018
  25. Jun 2018
  26. May 2018
  27. Apr 2018
  28. Mar 2018
  29. Feb 2018
  30. Jan 2018
  31. Dec 2017