Depending on what other component libraries you’ve used, you may be used to handling events by passing callback functions to component properties, or using a special event syntax – Svelte supports both, though one is usually more appropriate than the other depending on your situation. This post explains both ways.

When enough people make false promises, words stop meaning anything, then there are no answers just better and better lies.

For larger files, the wait time can be especially problematic. A standard download is an all-or-nothing affair—interruptions can corrupt them and render them useless. Worse, it can waste valuable data on a metered data plan, an unfortunately all-too-relevant concern.

I guess it's about "preloading" and not "navigation", if it's the case, then I guess there is still no way to attach to navigation events, and this issue should be kept open.

No JS event is fired, so there currently isn't any clean way to do this that I can see.

Fixes #1037 allow slotted components via making <Component> <Inner slot="foo" /> </Component> as a sugar syntax for <Component> <svelte:fragment slot="foo"> <Inner /> </svelte:fragment> </Component>

It's possible to have multiple event listeners for the same event

There's a huge area of seemingly obvious user-centric products that don't exist simply because there isn't a working business model to support it.

Google Archive Where old projects go to retire.

For use$ since svelte is never going to support actions for components, i designed something that reminds React hooks that will in some ways replace this feature.

@monkeythedev I am curious how do you "organize" your work - You forked https://github.com/hperrin/svelte-material-ui and https://github.com/hperrin/svelte-material-ui is not very active. Do you plan an independent project ? I hope the original author would return at some times, if not, i'll see

I think a casual look at the game could be quick to take fault that some moves are scripted, and perhaps they are.  If play passes to you and there is a stock to be had for free…why _not_ take it? For me, it’s a distraction. The player before you likely considered the options and found the game state to be worth tempting you with that. Those free, or even cheap, stocks won’t gain you the influence in any companies that can make your personal cache more valuable.

Ultimately, I’m an “are there tough decisions?” kind of gamer, and on that matter I’m torn. There are some turns and some positions and some situations that will play themselves. Sometimes obviously so, and sometimes after you think it out.

But seriously, give snowpack a read to understand the benefits of leaning on standard esm imports, allowing you to avoid a bundling process entirely.

I don't need to support non-esm browsers for most projects and I really like the idea of a super light build process. By removing the complexity of configuration and the overhead of bundling, svelvet makes the development process an optimal experience for myself and hopefully others

It replaces heavier, more complex bundlers like webpack or Parcel in your development workflow.

We do not utilize a formulaic or standard, formalized benchmarking level or element in setting our executive compensation relative to that of other companies. 

GET is the primary mechanism of information retrieval and the focus of almost all performance optimizations.

There's not much we can do there. It's not possible for a Svelte component to inspect another Svelte component and check if it exposes any prop

I understand this is not ideal, but sadly this is not something we can change as it's how Svelte works.

Just coming here to voice my agreement that these warnings are annoying and exist in other libraries as well. For me this happened with svelma. I didn't write the library code, so I don't have complete control over it even though I agree there is an argument to be had around whether I should be notified anyway. In either case, these warnings should be easily disabled since libraries don't always get updated over night.

In Cantrell's view, pharmaceutical companies are the only ones that have the money to do long-term studies on drug's efficacy, "but there's absolutely no financial incentive for them to do it." (When the medicine you need expires, you, or your insurer, pay for more.)

We don’t need to apply refactorings we don’t want.

We don’t have to compromise the architecture, API or semantic structure of our code base.

Intercepting proxies are commonly used in businesses to enforce acceptable use policy, and to ease administrative overheads since no client browser configuration is required.

The false promise of your source code repository is that everything it contains is “good.” To complete your task, just find something that does something similar, copy, modify, and you’re done. Looking inside the same repository seems like a safety mechanism for quality but, in fact, there is no such guarantee.

This is valid javascript! Or harmony or es6 or whatever, but importantly, it's not happening outside the js environment. This also allows us to use our standard tooling: the traceur compiler knows how to turn jsx`<div>Hello</div>`; into the equivalent browser compatible es3, and hence we can use anything the traceur compile accepts!

If you're targeting these platforms, there's no need to use a transpiler!

Most projects and teams need a balance between "big" and "no."

In highlighting the dangers of big-up-front-design (BUFD) and waterfall development, Agilists seem to advocate no-up-front-design (NUFD) or no-up-front-requirements (NUFR) or no-up-front-architecture (NUFA).

It was clear no one was interested in what I was working towards.

React hook for creating a value exactly once. useMemo doesn't give this guarantee unfortunately - https://reactjs.org/docs/hooks-faq.html#how-to-create-expensive-objects-lazily

However, it only serves as a hint, and doesn’t guarantee the computation won’t re-run. But sometimes you need to be sure an object is only created once.

There is this black hole syndrome where you spend hours working on something and get no feedback.

But I just want to say npx is lame. It should have been npm run or npm exec or something.

More than one subscriber can subscribe to the same field.

Wow, no answers to this question. That's too bad. Did you ever find the solution?

Luckily, there is absolutely no good reason not to use strict mode for everything — so the solution to this problem is to lobby the authors of those modules to update them.

and one which you don’t need to use and won’t add any code to your app if you choose not to use

And of course, if you don't use them you don't pay for them

The more I think about this, the more I think that maybe React already has the right solution to this particular issue, and we're tying ourselves in knots trying to avoid unnecessary re-rendering. Basically, this JSX... <Foo {...a} b={1} {...c} d={2}/> ...translates to this JS: React.createElement(Foo, _extends({}, a, { b: 1 }, c, { d: 2 })); If we did the same thing (i.e. bail out of the optimisation allowed by knowing the attribute names ahead of time), our lives would get a lot simpler, and the performance characteristics would be pretty similar in all but somewhat contrived scenarios, I think. (It'll still be faster than React, anyway!)

When you visit location /one and the server redirects you to location /two, you expect the browser’s address bar to display the redirected URL. However, Turbolinks makes requests using XMLHttpRequest, which transparently follows redirects. There’s no way for Turbolinks to tell whether a request resulted in a redirect without additional cooperation from the server. To work around this problem, send the Turbolinks-Location header in the final response to a visit that was redirected, and Turbolinks will replace the browser’s topmost history entry with the value you provide.

Open Science by Design

There's a few other questions on StackOverflow regarding how to structure YAML files for i18n, and I don't think there is a 'right' answer to your question. If it works for you, then great! I would say that any answer you get will be completely subjective, and more about i18n and translation management rather than anything specifically to do with the Rails way.

This repository has been archived by the owner. It is now read-only.

I could not find any way to do this with the standard library.

It’s even worse that there’s no alternative method that does the unsurprising thing IMO.

As of March 2018, Tor Messenger is no longer maintained and you should NOT use it.

Between 2008 and 2010 weren't any updated packages, resulting in the bundled version of Tor becoming obsolete and unable to connect to the Tor network,[2] which was the reason for the appearance of forks that basically just replaced the bundled Tor.exe with a current one.

We have come to a place where thanks to many libraries and frameworks, and overall improving software, what would’ve once used many developers to build from scratch is now more often than not, a bunch of people plumbing different things together. Software is creating software faster than we can use it. This is also why you are seeing so many of these “no-code” or “low-code” solutions pop up all over the place. There are increasingly fewer reasons to write code, and those who are writing code should, and do, increasingly write less of it. This will only be more accelerated by shifting to remote work due to how it’s going to change how we decide what code to write.

Anyone who’s spent a few months at a sizable tech company can tell you that a lot of software seems to exist primarily because companies have hired people to write and maintain them. In some ways, the software serves not the business, but the people who have written it, and then those who need to maintain it. This is stupid, but also very, very true.

Gifts have ribbons, not strings.

If we find that GitLab doesn't work as people expect, the documentation should be updated so this is no longer a surprise. This applies whether we classify it as a feature request or a bug.

A complete snapshot of the user’s browser window at that moment in time will be captured, pixel by pixel (!)

The mix of a fingerprint and first-party cookies is pervasive as Google can give a very high level of entropy when it comes to distinguishing an individual person.

Google encouraging site admins to put reCaptcha all over their sites, and then sharing the resulting risk scores with those admins is great for security, Perona thinks, because he says it “gives site owners more control and visibility over what’s going on” with potential scammer and bot attacks, and the system will give admins more accurate scores than if reCaptcha is only using data from a single webpage to analyze user behavior. But there’s the trade-off. “It makes sense and makes it more user-friendly, but it also gives Google more data,”

For instance, Google’s reCaptcha cookie follows the same logic of the Facebook “like” button when it’s embedded in other websites—it gives that site some social media functionality, but it also lets Facebook know that you’re there.

You have the right to withdraw from this contract within 14 days without giving any reason.

a person can withdraw from research at any point of time and it is no binding of participant to reveal the reason of discontinuation

Add-ons must function only as described, and should provide an appealing user experience. Based on the description of the add-on, a user must be able to understand and use the add-on’s features without requiring expert knowledge.

But, I was no longer using the gem, the issue activity was overwhelming, and the codebase in serious need of reworking.

Becouse of CanCan, StateMachine and others I deside to create OpenSource organization to maintain gems. People disappear, lose their passion about coding, get new interests, families, children. But if us many we can support gems much longer. I dont pretend to be an expierenced ruby developer, but I can do administarative work: managing teams, members, approve simple pool-requests. If you think it good idea and want to support some inactive gems, not life time, maybe just a little - welcome to organization.

There's actually discussion among the rubygems team about a process for putting gems "up for adoption" that you might be interested in: http://www.benjaminfleischer.com/2014/08/17/rubygems-adoption-center/

you can use my fork. It has all fixes and many people are using it. Pick your reaction

Before we get to passwords, surely you already have in mind that Google knows everything about you. It knows what websites you’ve visited, it knows where you’ve been in the real world thanks to Android and Google Maps, it knows who your friends are thanks to Google Photos. All of that information is readily available if you log in to your Google account. You already have good reason to treat the password for your Google account as if it’s a state secret.

Can we merge this? Or will I have to maintain my own fork?

In order to combat these form spam BOTS, websites often employ a series of textual or picture quizzes to the user submitting the form such as CAPTCHA. These tests are somewhat effective for standard BOTS, but are annoying to website visitors and often lead to abandoned contacts or site sales. In addition, BOTS are evolving to the point where these measures are becoming obsolete and ineffective.

The only place he could think of was the Trianon in mid-town

Thinking that he heard a knocking on the front door, he remained still and listened. It came again, faintly, hesitantly. He went through the store, wondering who it could be.

He squirmed uneasily and wondered if Taro would acknowledge the telegram which he had sent the day before after finally having hunted down the information that he was taking basic training in a California camp

HE FUNERAL WAS HELD SEVERAL DAYS LATER AT THE BUDDHIST church up on the hill next to a playground.

They did not speak again until the car was beside the grocery store.

I went to Portland with him.”

‘Put my ashes in an orange crate and dump them in the Sound off Connecticut Street Dock where the sewer runs out,’

It scared him to think that he might be sobering up.

Each year the winner is crowned with great fanfare at Eastwood Shopping Centre, which is owned by Yuhu Group, the company founded by billionaire property developer and political donor Huang Xiangmo.

“To measure the head, the height, etc., does not indeed mean that we are establishing a system of pedagogy, but it indicates the road which we may follow to arrive at such a system, since if we are to educate an individual, we must have a definite and direct knowledge of him.”

But in spite of all these tendencies, Scientific Pedagogy has never yet been definitely constructed nor defined. It is something vague of which we speak, but which does not,[Pg 2] in reality, exist. We might say that it has been, up to the present time, the mere intuition or suggestion of a science which, by the aid of the positive and experimental sciences that have renewed the thought of the nineteenth century, must emerge from the mist and clouds that have surrounded it.

Funding for his plan is still being debated, but he has come up with multiple suggestions that could be passed.

qPCR

AtthecoreofmyargumentisthewayinwhichGooglebiasessearchtoitsowneconomicinterests—foritsprofitabilityandtobolsteritsmarketdominanceatanyexpense

The fluorescence signal atCT37±7 corre-sponds to the no-template-control andrepresents bacterial DNA contamination inthe commercially supplied reagents.

the vote of no confidence

by these elucidations given rise or increase to his doubts, and drawn obscurity upon the place

excessive reading has a scattering effect: “In reading of many books is distraction.”

Beyond the Frame: The New Classroom

having children is a privilege that has been historically denied to many nonwhite and nonafflu-ent people.

What order, so contriv'd as not to mix Tastes, not well joynd, inelegant, but bring [ 335 ] Taste after taste upheld with kindliest change,

Incessentaly correcting graamer

Puedes perder peso RAPIDO con esta dieta para adelgazar 5 kilos

Causa Bromatología: “No está probada la asociación ilícita”

Cuando hagas tu ejercicio cardiovascular antes te vas a preparar poniendo un gel adelgazante en la cintura, después te envuelves en papel transparente y te pones una faja que te haga sudar, pero no muy apretada ok!, te vas a correr, a tu zumba o lo que quieras que te haga sudar, por lo menos por 40 minutos, mínimo 3 veces por semana. Si puedes y no te parece muy incómodo usa la cinturilla (waist trainer) durante el día bajo la ropa. Esto combinado con las otras cosas que te digo aquí te va a ayudar a moldear cintura.

Existen por lo menos dos formas de saber con quién habla tu amado o amada.Aquí te vamos a explicar lo que debes hacer y por supuesto, esperamos sea de gran ayuda para ti, puedas quitarte esa perturbación de la cabeza y sigas tu vida en total tranquilidad.

¿Es posible pensar en configuraciones no totalizantes que no se comporten como sistemas convencionales pero que, sin embargo, actúen como un todo? Dicho de otra manera, el pensamiento de sistemas se basa en la idea de que el todo surge de la interacción de las partes. Durante las últimas tres décadas las teorías de emergencia y auto-organización han puesto de relieve el hecho de que estos procesos dan lugar a sistemas complejos que no son fijos ni estáticos sino abiertos y adaptables y, a menudo, existen dentro de condiciones de inestabilidad y lejos del equilibrio

La creciente visibilidad de la no dualidad también es un reflejo del hecho de que, en realidad, nadie funciona como un juguete cartesiano puro; en términos fenomenológicos simplemente no podemos hacerlo; rehusamos dividir la vida de acuerdo con separaciones rígidas

Existe el riesgo, sin embargo, de pluralizar lo moderno. Aunque tiene mucho sentido hablar de modernidades alternativas o múltiples (a nivel mundial) el riesgo es reintroducir, por la puerta trasera, la premisa de un solo mundo compartido o real y la universalización de las formas dominantes de ver. Un segundo peligro es absolver a la modernidad de cualquier mal ya que, después de todo, muchos ‘modernos diferentes’ (por ejemplo, aquellos que provienen de regiones o culturas europeas no dominantes) argumentarán que nunca fueron parte del orden moderno dominante.

Hay fuentes importantes en lo que podría llamarse ‘Occidentes alternativos’ o ‘modernidades no dominantes’, algunas de los cuales ya he mencionado

Como hipótesis provisional sostengo que la dependencia de formas de racionalidad y análisis logocéntrico de larga data sigue siendo fundamental para la producción académica crítica (¡incluyendo este libro!) y que, a pesar de su notable productividad, tiene consecuencias para ir más allá de las ontologías dualistas. Para desarrollar esta hipótesis, aunque de forma rudimentaria, comienzo recordando el argumento de Varela y sus colegas sobre los límites de la racionalidad abstracta y su insistencia en unir la reflexión y la experiencia. Esto es precisamente lo que trató de hacer la fenomenología; sin embargo —argumentan Varela, Thomson y Rosch— no pudo contestar, completamente, las preguntas radicales que planteaba. ¿Por qué? Su respuesta es relativamente simple pero las consecuencias son de largo alcance. La fenomenología se estancó, precisamente, porque su análisis de la experiencia sigue estando “dentro de la corriente principal de la filosofía Occidental [...] hizo hincapié en el contexto pragmático y encarnado de la experiencia humana, pero de una manera puramente teórica” (Varela et al. 1991: 19). ¿Puede esta afirmación17ser aplicable a la teoría social en su conjunto, tal vez incluso a aquellas tendencias que problematizan sus dualismos estructurantes?

Los actores que operan en estos diversos campos están elaborando un léxico para una transición cultural y ecológica significativa, impulsada, en parte, por un énfasis en formas de ser y hacer no dualistas, postcapitalistas y no liberales (

El primer punto es que el problema no es que los dualismos existan; después de todo muchas sociedades se han estructurado en torno a las dualidades, aunque en la mayoría de los casos estas dualidades son tratadas en términos de complementariedad de pares no jerárquicos (e.g., la dualidad yin/yang). El problema es la forma como son tratadas esas divisiones culturalmente, en particular las jerarquías establecidas entre los pares de cada binario y las consecuencias sociales, ecológicas y políticas de esas jerarquías. En el argot de la perspectiva decolonial latinoamericana esta característica se conoce como ‘colonialidad’ y es considerada central para el sistema mundo moderno/colonial que nació con la conquista de América y que erigió al mundo europeo en la cúspide de la civilización. Una característica central de esta colonialidad del poder es la clasificación jerárquica de las diferencias, lo cual conduce a la supresión, devaluación, subordinación o, incluso, destrucción de formas de conocimiento y ser que no se ajustan a los dictados de la forma dominante de la modernidad de origen europeo. En términos de género, la colonialidad cimentó la separación entre lo humano/civilizado (el mundo europeo), clasificado también en términos de género, y lo no-humano/no-civilizado (los mundos no-modernos de los pueblos racializados), los cuales solo podían ser descritos en términos de sexo biológico.

Por otro lado, el matriarcado no se define por el predominio de las mujeres sobre los hombres sino por toda una concepción diferente de la vida que no se basa en la dominación y las jerarquías y que respeta el tejido relacional de la vida. Por eso se puede decir que en el principio de todas las culturas estaba la madre (en última instancia, la Madre Tierra), es decir, la relación, como aún sucede en muchos pueblos indígenas que conservan prácticas matriarcales. Progresivamente, sin embargo, los hombres socavaron este fundamento de la vida en su intento por usurpar el poder de las mujeres y crear vida a través de lo que von Werholf llama ‘alquimia patriarcal’.

The journal title and volume number are italicized

Christian friend near me, either to comfort or help me