- May 2021
-
www.researchgate.net www.researchgate.net
-
Bruguiera gymnorrhiza
-
Bruguiera parvifiora
-
Avicennia marina
-
Aegiceras corniculatum
-
vicennia mari-na
-
-
pdf.sciencedirectassets.com pdf.sciencedirectassets.com
-
lMytilua edulis
-
Mytilus edulis
-
Theodoxm fluviatilis,
-
Ephydatiafluviatilis
-
Cordylophora caspia
-
Cyprinodon macularius
-
Gamrnarus dueben
-
Cordylophora caspia
-
Cordytophora caspia
-
Garnmarus auebeni
-
Ilomarus americanus
-
Cor@lophor~: caspia
-
C. macularius
-
Cyprinodon macularius
-
Salmo iridaeus
-
Theodoxus fluviatilis
-
Fundu/us heteroditus
-
Anguilla anguilla
-
Eriocheir sinensis
-
Sargus rondelet
-
Scyllium catulus
-
Scorpaena porcus
-
Mytilus eduli
-
Metridium rnarginatum
-
Metapenaeus monocero
-
Palaemonetes varians
-
O~poda quadrata (albicans
-
Gammarus dueben
-
Alderia modesta
-
Hemigrapsus oregonensi
-
Potamon edulis
-
Gammarus locusta
-
Eriphia spinifrons
-
Carcinus maena
-
Nerds diversicolo
-
Mytilus edulis
-
Hemigrapsus nudus
-
Tigriopusfulvus
-
Pleuronectes platessa
-
Mytilus edulis
-
Sesarma cinereum
-
Sphaeroma hookeri
-
Gammarus duebeni
-
poly- chaete Nerds ( Neanthes) diversicolor
-
Cvprinodon macularius
-
Nerds (Neanthes) diversicolo
-
Gammarus duebeni
-
Carcinus maenas
-
Fundulus parvipinnis
-
Mytilus californianus
-
Littorina littorea
-
Carcinus maenas
-
Gammarus dueben
-
-
Local file Local file
-
S. hystrix
-
S. pistillata
-
S. hystrix
-
S. ~~stii~a
-
S. hysttix
-
S. pi&#utu
-
. hystrix
-
S. pistiffut
-
S. pi~~Zlat
-
S. hystrix
-
S. hystrix
-
S. pistillatu
-
S. hystrix
-
S. pistillat
-
S. hystrix
-
S. pistiliut
-
S. hy_~ir
-
S. pistillat
-
S. hystrix
-
S. pistillat
-
S. hystrix
-
S. pistilfat
-
S. hystrix
-
S. p~t~llat
-
S. pistillata
-
S. pistillata
-
S. pistillata
-
S. pistillata.
-
S. pistillata
-
S. pistillata
-
S. pistillata
-
M. annutaris
-
S. &SO+
-
S. p~t~Zlfft
-
S. hystnjc
-
S. pistiilata
-
S. hystrix
-
S. pistillata
-
S. hystrix
-
S. pistillata
-
S. pistillat
-
S. hystix
-
S. hystrix)
-
S. pistillata
-
S. hystrix)
-
S. pistillata
-
S. kq~tnic
-
S. pistilfata
-
S. ~~sti~~a
-
S. hystrix,
-
S.pistillata
-
S. hystrix
-
S. pistiliata
-
S. Zz~M
-
S. pistillata
-
S. pjstiZlat
-
S. hystrix
-
S. pistillutu
-
S. hystrix
-
S. pistillata
-
S. hystrix
-
S. pistillat
-
S. hystrix
-
S. pistillatu
-
S. hystrix
-
S. pistillutu
-
S. hystrix
-
S. pistillata
-
S. hystrix
-
S. pistillata
-
Seriatopora hystrix
-
~iy~ophora p~ti~~at
-
S~ylu~~ffrapj~~jll
-
~~f~~~~e~ annuIa~~
-
Faviu
-
S. @&ri_
-
S. pirtiltata
-
S. hyTn$.
-
S. pirrillara
-
S. hystrix
-
S. pistilZat
-
S. hystrir
-
S. pistillat
-
S. p~~~~~i
-
Sericztopora hystrix
-
SryZ~phorap~til~a
-
S~~fft~p~~~ ~ys~~x
-
~ty~~~~u~~ ~~s~~~~
-
-
www-jstor-org.dlsu.idm.oclc.org www-jstor-org.dlsu.idm.oclc.org
-
phylum Chlorophyta.
-
phylum Rhodophyta
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Robert Saunders on Twitter. (2020). Twitter. Retrieved 1 March 2021, from https://twitter.com/redhistorian/status/1326802784168124416
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Jose-Luis Jimenez. (2021, February 5). 1/ Some reflections on scientific Twitter sociology I hadn’t used Twitter much before the pandemic. I was used to the politics of peer-review, grants, large studies etc. But scientific Twitter can be the Wild West by comparison. [Tweet]. @jljcolorado. https://twitter.com/jljcolorado/status/1357737374621515776
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Darren Dahly. (2021, February 24). @SciBeh One thought is that we generally don’t ‘press’ strangers or even colleagues in face to face conversations, and when we do, it’s usually perceived as pretty aggressive. Not sure why anyone would expect it to work better on twitter. Https://t.co/r94i22mP9Q [Tweet]. @statsepi. https://twitter.com/statsepi/status/1364482411803906048
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
ReconfigBehSci on Twitter: ‘@timcolbourn alongside dubious relationships with parties that in other contexts would require declarations of interest or that have independent hallmarks of being bad faith actors’ / Twitter. (n.d.). Retrieved 3 March 2021, from https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1351197722104258560
-
-
-
Trovò, B., & Massari, N. (2021). Ants-Review: A Protocol for Incentivized Open Peer-Reviews on Ethereum. ArXiv:2101.09378 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.09378
-
-
www.mcgill.ca www.mcgill.ca
-
Epidemiology 101 for Journalists. (n.d.). Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health. Retrieved 23 February 2021, from https://www.mcgill.ca/epi-biostat-occh/epidemiology-101-journalists
-
- Apr 2021
-
royalsociety.org royalsociety.org
-
“Long Covid: An Unfolding Story | Royal Society.” Accessed April 30, 2021. https://royalsociety.org/science-events-and-lectures/2021/04/long-covid/.
-
-
-
UHahn. (2021, April 22). Behavioural Science one year on: How did we do? [Reddit Post]. R/BehSciResearch. www.reddit.com/r/BehSciResearch/comments/mw8ngy/behavioural_science_one_year_on_how_did_we_do/
-
-
www.thelancet.com www.thelancet.com
-
Ten scientific reasons in support of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2—The Lancet. (n.d.). Retrieved April 19, 2021, from https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00869-2/fulltext
-
-
www.scientificamerican.com www.scientificamerican.com
-
Given the circumstances, Scientific American has agreed with major news outlets worldwide to start using the term “climate emergency” in its coverage of climate change
-
-
-
Białek, M., & Grossmann, I. (2021). Social bias insights concern judgments rather than real-world decisions. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/y3h7n
-
-
www.pnas.org www.pnas.org
-
West, J. D., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2021). Misinformation in and about science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(15). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912444117
-
-
www.washingtonpost.com www.washingtonpost.com
-
Emails show Trump officials celebrate efforts to change CDC reports on coronavirus—The Washington Post. (n.d.). Retrieved April 12, 2021, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2021/04/09/cdc-covid-political-interference/
Tags
- is:article
- COVID-19
- government
- response
- lang:en
- schools
- bad science
- political interference
- scientific advice
- data
- CDC
- science
- Trump
- USA
- misinformation
- politics
- public health
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- economy
- scientific practice
- Donald Trump
- scientific integrity
- children
Annotators
URL
-
- Mar 2021
-
-
‘bold’ means to have many observational consequences
As I said at the wiki I saw this link from, you don't test the hypothesis directly, you test the predictions, the "observational consequences", from the hypothesis.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Maarten van Smeden. (2021, March 25). 🚨🚨NEW EVIDENCE PYRAMID🚨🚨 https://t.co/RnGfl337tD [Tweet]. @MaartenvSmeden. https://twitter.com/MaartenvSmeden/status/1375008127737851904
-
-
osf.io osf.io
-
Breznau, N., Rinke, E. M., Wuttke, A., Adem, M., Adriaans, J., Alvarez-Benjumea, A., Andersen, H. K., Auer, D., Azevedo, F., Bahnsen, O., Balzer, D., Bauer, G., Bauer, P. C., Baumann, M., Baute, S., Benoit, V., Bernauer, J., Berning, C., Berthold, A., … Nguyen, H. H. V. (2021). Observing Many Researchers using the Same Data and Hypothesis Reveals a Hidden Universe of Data Analysis. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/cd5j9
Tags
- researcher variability
- scientific method
- crowdsourcing
- psychology
- noise
- lang:en
- meta-science
- political science
- researcher degrees of freedom
- economics
- analytical flexibility
- garden of forking paths
- sociology
- crowd sourced replication initiative
- reseach
- behavioural science
- is:preprint
- immigration
- social policy
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.cam.ac.uk www.cam.ac.uk
-
Machine learning models for diagnosing COVID-19 are not yet suitable for clinical use. (2021, March 15). University of Cambridge. https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/machine-learning-models-for-diagnosing-covid-19-are-not-yet-suitable-for-clinical-use
-
-
-
Coenen, A., & Gureckis, T. (2021). The distorting effects of deciding to stop sampling information. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tbrea
-
-
deevybee.blogspot.com deevybee.blogspot.com
-
Deevybee. (2020, December 6). BishopBlog: Faux peer-reviewed journals: a threat to research integrity. BishopBlog. http://deevybee.blogspot.com/2020/12/faux-peer-reviewed-journals-threat-to.html
-
-
edmontonjournal.com edmontonjournal.com
-
Bergot, N. (2020, October 24). Battling fake science: University of Alberta launches free online science literacy course. Edmonton Journal. https://edmontonjournal.com/news/local-news/battling-fake-science-ualberta-launches-free-online-science-literacy-course
-
-
www.collabovid.org www.collabovid.org
-
Collabovid. (n.d.). Retrieved 6 March 2021, from https://www.collabovid.org/
-
-
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
-
Hackathon: Climate denial and COVID-19 misinformation: birds of a feather? : BehSciAsk. (n.d.). Reddit. Retrieved 6 March 2021, from https://www.reddit.com/r/BehSciAsk/comments/jjk00r/hackathon_climate_denial_and_covid19/
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Cailin O’Connor. (2020, November 10). Using agent-based methods we show how even modest contact between disciplines can allow better methods to spread. This is because outsiders can award academic credit to those using good methods, leading to their uptake. 5 [Tweet]. @cailinmeister. https://twitter.com/cailinmeister/status/1326229762533060608
-
-
www.principia.network www.principia.network
-
PRINCIPIA - Decentralized peer review. (n.d.). Retrieved 5 March 2021, from http://www.principia.network/
-
-
statsepi.substack.com statsepi.substack.com
-
PhD, D. D. (n.d.). Managing scientific discourse on Twitter. Retrieved 5 March 2021, from https://statsepi.substack.com/p/managing-scientific-discourse-on
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Write That PhD. (2020, October 31). Doing a systematic review? How to prepare, conduct & document a search + manage your results & screening tools https://t.co/xdAC35VmaK #phdchat #phdadvice #phdforum #phdlife #ecrchat #acwri https://t.co/sh62MypqOi [Tweet]. @WriteThatPhD. https://twitter.com/WriteThatPhD/status/1322467814733713408
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Cailin O’Connor. (2020, November 10). New paper!!! @psmaldino look at what causes the persistence of poor methods in science, even when better methods are available. And we argue that interdisciplinary contact can lead better methods to spread. 1 https://t.co/C5beJA5gMi [Tweet]. @cailinmeister. https://twitter.com/cailinmeister/status/1326221893372833793
-
-
redteammarket.com redteammarket.com
-
Market, R. T. (n.d.). Build trust through criticism. Red Team Market. Retrieved 4 March 2021, from https://redteammarket.com/
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Simone, Costanza De, Antonella Battisti, and Azzurra Ruggeri. “Differential Impact of Web Habits and Active Navigation on Adolescents’ Online Learning.” PsyArXiv, March 1, 2021. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hsvc4.
-
-
www.nature.com www.nature.com
-
Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(12), 1217–1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Anne Urai. (2020, November 15). All-inclusive authorship on large scientific papers can a be dangerous practice Alert: Potential unpopular opinion Thread 👇1/n [Tweet]. @AnneEUrai. https://twitter.com/AnneEUrai/status/1327934091929464832
-
- Feb 2021
-
www.wsj.com www.wsj.com
-
We’ll Have Herd Immunity by April
Overall scientific credibility: 'very low', according to scientists who analyzed this article.
Find more details in Health Feedback's analysis
-
-
www.cbc.ca www.cbc.ca
-
Pennycook, Gordon. ‘How the COVID-19 Crisis Exposes Widespread Climate Change Hypocrisy’. CBC, 22 May 2020. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/opinion-climate-change-should-believe-dont-understand-1.5482416.
-
-
osf.io osf.io
-
Smaldino, Paul E., and Cailin O’Connor. ‘Interdisciplinarity Can Aid the Spread of Better Methods Between Scientific Communities’. MetaArXiv, 5 November 2020. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/cm5v3.
-
-
www.bristol.ac.uk www.bristol.ac.uk
-
Bristol, U. of. (n.d.). January: COVID-19 vaccine communication handbook | News and features | University of Bristol. University of Bristol. Retrieved 25 February 2021, from http://www.bristol.ac.uk/news/2021/january/covid-19-vaccine-communication-handbook.html
-
-
www.nature.com www.nature.com
-
Thompson, B., Baker, N., & Watson, T. (2020). Coronapod: The big COVID research papers of 2020. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03609-2
-
-
link.springer.com link.springer.com
-
Oreskes, N. (2019). Systematicity is necessary but not sufficient: On the problem of facsimile science. Synthese, 196(3), 881–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1481-1
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Ledgerwood, Alison, Sa-kiera Tiarra Jolynn Hudson, Jr Neil Lewis, Keith Maddox, Cynthia Pickett, Jessica Remedios, Sapna Cheryan, et al. ‘The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive’. PsyArXiv, 11 January 2021. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue.
-
-
crystalprisonzone.blogspot.com crystalprisonzone.blogspot.com
-
Joe. (2021, January 26). Crystal Prison Zone: I tried to report scientific misconduct. How did it go? Crystal Prison Zone. http://crystalprisonzone.blogspot.com/2021/01/i-tried-to-report-scientific-misconduct.html
Tags
- result
- value
- lang:en
- significant
- non-signficant
- test
- forge
- misconduct
- data
- self-correction
- unreliable
- science
- false
- is:blog
- table
- statistic
- correction
- scientific
- outcome
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.sciencedirect.com www.sciencedirect.com
-
van der Linden, S. (2021). The Gateway Belief Model (GBM): A review and research agenda for communicating the scientific consensus on climate change. Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.01.005
-
-
www.climatechangecommunication.org www.climatechangecommunication.org
-
Debunking Handbook 2020 | Center For Climate Change Communication. (n.d.). Retrieved 16 February 2021, from https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/debunking-handbook-2020/
-
- Jan 2021
-
-
Nuijten, M. B. (2020). Efficient Scientific Self-Correction in Times of Crisis. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9hc8z
-
-
www.pnas.org www.pnas.org
-
Grzegorz. S., Żogała-Siudem. B., Cena. A. Gagolewski. M., (2020).Three dimensions of scientific impact. PNAS. 117 (25) 13896-13900
-
- Dec 2020
-
www.danielgreenfield.org www.danielgreenfield.org
-
A scientist who does not utilize the scientific method is as much use as a carpenter who cannot make chairs or a plumber who cannot fix toilets. A science that exists as a fixed absolute, whose premises are not to be questioned, whose data is not to be examined and whose conclusions are not to be debated, is a pile of wood or a leaky toilet. Not the conclusion of a process, but its absence.
Understanding science is a process.
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Ross, L. (2020). How Intellectual Communities Progress. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/k6yux
-
- Nov 2020
-
abcnews.go.com abcnews.go.com
-
Gov. Kristi Noem defended her hands-off approach to managing the deadly COVID-19 pandemic while addressing lawmakers earlier this week and called mandatory stay-at home orders "useless" in helping lower the spread.
Take away: Lower COVID-19 spread occurred after stay-at home orders were issued. Room for debate exists on how restrictive lockdowns should be.
The claim: Mandatory stay-at home orders are "useless" in helping lower the spread of SARS-CoV-2.
The evidence: Two publications showed that lower COVID-19 spread occurred after stay-at home orders were issued (1, 2). Hospitalizations were lower than predicted exponential growth rates after implementation of stay-at home orders (3). Some caveats to consider include that it is impossible to tease apart the effects of the stay-at home orders from other measure implemented simultaneously with stay-at home orders such as increased hygiene measures, social distancing guidelines, and school closures. It is also impossible to conclusively state that the effect is from the stay-at home order and not the natural progression of the disease.
The comparison between Illinois with stay-at home orders and Iowa without stay-at home orders resulted in an estimated 217 additional COVID-19 cases in Iowa over the course of a month (2). This small number raises the question, "are stay-at home orders worth it?" It is important to remember that comparison of Iowa and Illinois is the comparison of two social distancing strategies. Stay-at home orders close everything and then write the exceptions that can remain open. Iowa took the approach of leaving everything open except what the government choose to close (4). Some businesses in Iowa were still closed and many federal guidelines were still followed. A negative control showing disease progression without any mitigation measures does not exist in published literature.
Sources:
1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246016/
-
-
www.biorxiv.org www.biorxiv.org
-
We have designed a dimeric lipopeptide fusion inhibitor that blocks this critical first step of infection for emerging coronaviruses and document that it completely prevents SARS-CoV-2 infection in ferrets.
The takeaway: Dimeric lipopeptide fusion inhibitor prevented SARS-CoV-2 infection in all six ferrets tested. Much more work is needed before this could be used in humans.
The claim: Treatment of ferrets with a dimeric lipopeptide fusion inhibitor completely prevents SARS-CoV-2 infection in ferrets.
The evidence: Per Figure 3, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in all three animals inoculated with the virus, all six animals treated with a placebo, and none of the animals treated with the dimeric lipopeptide fusion inhibitor (1). Animals treated with dimeric lipopeptide fusion inhibitor did not mount an immune response to SARS-CoV-2 while an immune response was seen in inoculated animals and placebo treated animals (Figure 4).
More research is needed before this treatment can be used in humans. This preliminary study showed that in a small sample of animals which do not typically show COVID symptoms, SARS-CoV-2 infection was blocked by the dimeric lipopeptide fusion inhibitor. This paper describes the first step in a long journey. Before a new treatment is approved for use in humans, Phase I, II and III clinical trials must be completed (2) which includes showing that a treatment does no harm to healthy humans and proving that it works in humans. This work also needs peer-review in a published journal which may occur with time.
Sources:
1) https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.04.361154v1.full.pdf
2) https://www.fda.gov/patients/drug-development-process/step-3-clinical-research
-
- Oct 2020
-
www.sciencedirect.com www.sciencedirect.com
-
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
-
Schmid, P., Schwarzer, M., & Betsch, C. (n.d.). Weight-of-Evidence Strategies to Mitigate the Influence of Messages of Science Denialism in Public Discussions. Journal of Cognition, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.125
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Open Science Community Tilburg on Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved October 28, 2020, from https://twitter.com/OpenTilburg/status/1318518990000607234
-
-
arxiv.org arxiv.org
-
Brañas-Garza, P., Jorrat, D., Espín, A. M., & Sánchez, A. (2020). Paid and hypothetical time preferences are the same: Lab, field and online evidence. ArXiv:2010.09262 [Physics]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.09262
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Royal Statistical Society on Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved October 25, 2020, from https://twitter.com/RoyalStatSoc/status/1317133702183456769
-