116 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. This research not only prompts the development of better cognitive and reading models that account for environmental variables

      This study demonstrates the impact of weather on reading during driving, offering new insights for cognitive theory by showing how environmental factors shape language processing while in motion.

    2. Specifically, the negative impact of rainy conditions on response times became increasingly pronounced as the task progressed, indicating that prolonged exposure to visual degradation may result in accumulated perceptual fatigue or reduced adaptation efficiency. Importantly, frequency effects remained stable over time, suggesting that lexical familiarity consistently facilitates word recognition regardless of task progression.

      Task performance changed over time, with slight accuracy gains and increasingly slower responses in rain, suggesting accumulating perceptual fatigue, while stable frequency effects showed that lexical familiarity consistently aided recognition throughout the task.

    3. All in all, these results suggest that drivers may be more susceptible to distractions and slower in processing linguistic information during rainy conditions

      Overall, the findings show that rainy conditions slow drivers' processing of written information, underscoring the need for adaptive, weather-responsive signage and intelligent transportation systems that enhance visibility, support real-time traffic sign recognition, and improve safety under adverse environmental conditions.

    4. In our study, the perceptual degradation induced by rain may have impaired visual acuity without reaching the threshold necessary to engage top-down lexical compensation, thereby resulting in additive effects between weather and word frequency.

      The lack of interaction between weather and word frequency indicates that rain likely disrupts early visual encoding equally for all words, producing independent, additive effects that occur before later lexical frequency processes can engage.

    5. As expected, and in line with preceding research showing consistent frequency effects during single-word recognition [see 41,42], results showed that high-frequency words were recognized more quickly and slightly more accurately than low-frequency ones under dynamic perceptual conditions.

      Participants identified high- and low-frequency words on VR traffic signs and, consistent with prior research, recognized high-frequency words faster and slightly more accurately. They also took longer to recognize words in rainy conditions, confirming that adverse weather impairs visibility and slows linguistic processing, mirroring patterns found in both reading research and real-world driving studies.

    6. Together, these findings support the notion that the visual word recognition system is both robust and flexible, adapting dynamically to the level and timing of perceptual constraints.

      Adverse weather like rain, fog, snow, and wind impairs visibility and affects drivers’ cognitive functioning, raising accident risk by up to 13% and making it harder to process fast-moving road signs. Because so much written information is read while we’re in motion, understanding how people recognize words under these conditions matters. Yet research shows the visual word recognition system is highly resilient—people can read distorted, rotated, or altered text with only small costs, thanks to flexible letter-detection mechanisms that tolerate substantial visual degradation unless disruptions are extreme.

    7. reaction times were slower in rainy compared to sunny conditions, indicating that adverse weather impairs processing speed but not overall recognition accuracy.

      Rainy conditions caused consistent delays in processing speed, showing that weather makes the brain slower at taking in and interpreting information. Participants were 126-139 ms slower during rain, showing a meaningful cognitive delay.

    1. Currently, although the impact of weather on happiness has been supported by both theoretical and empirical research, there are still many uncertainties in these findings, which create challenges in creating conditions that enhance happiness for individuals.

      Despite strong theoretical and empirical support for weather's influence on happiness, major uncertainties remain due to things such as differing weather factors, the variability of emotional responses across situations, the potential for daily activities to overshadow weather effects, and the scarcity of experimental research needed to establish clear casual relationships.

    2. Men were more sensitive to temperature changes and preferred cooler weather, while women’s happiness was less influenced by temperature variations.

      Weather's effect on well-being varies across individuals, with factors like gender, age, and socioeconomic status shaping sensitivity. For example, studies show men's emotions are more influenced by temperature fluctuations than women's, illustrating how personal characteristics moderate weather's impact on happiness.

    3. sunshine and high temperatures not only contribute to the generation of particulate matter in the air but also facilitate the formation of ozone. In contrast, weather conditions that make people want to stay indoors (e.g., precipitation, low temperatures, and strong winds) are more conducive to fresh air and fewer pollutants in the atmosphere.

      Favorable weather like sunshine, warmth, low humidity, and light winds encourage outdoor activity but also promote the formation and stagnation of pollutants, while less pleasant conditions like rain, cold, or strong winds tend to clean the air, with events like typhoons and heavy rainfall significantly improving air quality.

    4. This highlights the significant role that climate events play in shaping long-term psychological well-being, especially as individuals and communities face an increasingly unpredictable climate.

      Past experiences with extreme weather damage and worries about future climate change can jointly reduce current well-being, showing that both lived trauma and ongoing uncertainty contribute to long-term emotional strain in an increasingly unpredictable climate.

    5. A study involving 226,808 Puerto Rican adolescents revealed that 5 to 9 months after the hurricane, participants reported increased levels of negative emotions such as depression (65). Similarly, following Hurricane Katrina, a study of 325 adolescents who experienced the storm found that participants generally showed signs of anxiety and other negative emotions (66).

      EWEs like hurricanes and wildfires significantly harm emotional well-being, with studies showing that adolescents and adults exposed to disasters such as Hurricane Maria, Hurricane Katrina, and major wildfires experience heightened levels of depression, anxiety, and other mental health problems months after the events.

    6. The interactions between EWEs and human health are complex and can be categorized into two main types: (1) direct impacts, which result from extreme physical climate phenomena such as storms or floods, and (2) indirect impacts, which typically arise from environmental changes, such as water quality deterioration or land use changes, that affect biogeophysical processes (63, 64).

      Extreme weather events (EWEs), made more frequent and severe due to global warming, create both direct impacts (like storms, floods, and heatwaves), and indirect impacts (such as degraded water quality and land-use changes), all of which interact with social and demographic factors to shape and often worsen mental health and overall well-being.

  2. Nov 2025
    1. This suggests that calmer wind conditions are associated with higher life satisfaction, particularly among women.

      Lower wind speeds are linked to higher life satisfaction, especially for women, with research showing that a one–standard deviation drop in wind speed significantly increases reported life satisfaction.

    2. They found that precipitation in January had a significant negative correlation with happiness, indicating that rain was associated with lower levels of well-being.

      Cloud cover, rain, humidity, and wind speed generally reduce subjective well-being, with studies showing that cloudy or rainy days, high humidity, and related conditions consistently correlate with lower happiness and more negative emotional states.

    3. As a result, environmental psychology often considers how these multidimensional weather factors work together to shape an individual’s emotional state, social behavior, and the quality of social interactions, ultimately impacting subjective well-being.

      Overall, weather conditions such as light, temperature, rainfall, humidity, air quality, and wind speed directly influence well-being by shaping physiological responses, emotional states, and social behaviors; factors like sunlight and comfortable temperatures generally promote positive emotions, while gloomy weather, high humidity, poor air quality, and strong winds can trigger negative feelings or stress, and together these multidimensional weather elements interact to shape mental health, daily behavior, and overall subjective well-being.

    4. The above theories provide profound insights into how weather influences well-being through physiological, emotional, and cognitive pathways, revealing the complex relationship between weather conditions and individual well-being.

      These theories show that weather influences well-being through interconnected physiological, emotional, and cognitive processes rooted in both basic needs and evolutionary history.

    5. When individuals are in a non-threatening environment, they naturally produce positive emotional responses. These responses further influence attention, physiological reactions, and behavior, thereby enhancing well-being (6).

      Evolutionary psychology explains that humans are naturally inclined to feel positive in safe, non-threatening natural environments, meaning favorable weather conditions automatically boost emotional and physiological well-being.

    6. As a key component of the natural environment, weather conditions can significantly influence an individual’s emotions and overall well-being. Weather not only affects people’s living conditions and external environmental settings but can also impact happiness by altering emotional states.

      Maslow’s theory and Lyubomirsky’s happiness model suggest that pleasant weather fulfills basic needs and contributes to the environmental portion of well-being, thereby directly influencing emotions and overall happiness.

    7. The affective events theory suggests that an individual’s emotional state is often directly influenced by life events, with weather, as an inescapable external variable in daily life, typically representing the “atmospheric conditions” of daily living.

      Environmental psychology offers a key framework for understanding how weather—through factors like temperature, sunlight, precipitation, and air quality—affects emotional and cognitive well-being, but inconsistent findings across studies show that these effects depend not only on objective weather conditions but also on individual physiological, psychological, and social differences.

    8. Well-being is not only the core pursuit of human life but also an important predictor of various positive life outcomes, such as longevity, creativity, quality of interpersonal relationships, and work efficiency (1).

      Well-being is deeply intertwined with weather conditions, a relationship long noted in daily life and literature. Modern research on this topic has rapidly expanded, revealing through multidisciplinary studies how weather influences well-being via physiological, psychological, and social pathways.

  3. Oct 2025
    1. Once the storm hits Jamaica, Sublette says, he worries about what will happen when it interacts with the island’s mountains. “The wind is gonna be even higher” in the mountains, he says. “The rainfall is gonna be worse. There are going to be landslides—that’s not something we had in New Orleans or Miami.”

      more oof

  4. Jun 2025
  5. May 2025
  6. Apr 2025
  7. Jan 2025
  8. Oct 2024
    1. Erstmals wurde genau erfasst, welcher Teil der von Waldbränden betroffenen Gebiete sich auf die menschlich verursachte Erhitzung zurückführen lässt. Er wächst seit 20 Jahren deutlich an. Insgesamt kompensieren die auf die Erhitzung zurückgehenden Waldbrände den Rückgang an Bränden durch Entwaldung. Der von Menschen verursachte – und für die Berechnung von Schadensansprüchen relevante – Anteil der CO2-Emissione ist damit deutlich höher als bisher angenommen https://www.carbonbrief.org/climate-change-almost-wipes-out-decline-in-global-area-burned-by-wildfires/

    1. Die Niederschläge im Verlauf des Sturms Boris sind durch die globale Erhitzung zweimal wahrscheinlicher geworden. Die Niederschlagsmenge lag um ca. 7% höher, als sie es in der vorindustriellen Zeit gewesen wäre. Das sind die Ergebnisse einer Attributionsstudie von World Weather Attribution. Ähnlich hohe Niederschlagsmengen waren in den betroffenen Gebieten nie zuvor gemessen worden.

      https://www.liberation.fr/environnement/tempete-boris-les-pluies-diluviennes-en-europe-centrale-ont-ete-rendues-deux-fois-plus-probables-par-le-rechauffement-20240925_NUD2FMRCD5F67KQV4264EX4UOQ/

      Meldung von World Weather Attribution: https://www.worldweatherattribution.org/climate-change-and-high-exposure-increased-costs-and-disruption-to-lives-and-livelihoods-from-flooding-associated-with-exceptionally-heavy-rainfall-in-central-europe/

  9. Sep 2024
  10. Aug 2024
  11. May 2024
  12. Apr 2024
    1. Eine extreme Hitzewelle hat in der Sahelzone Hunderte, wahrscheinlich Tausende Menschenleben gefordert. World Weather Attribution zufolge ist die Höhe der Temperaturen eindeutig auf die globale Erhitzung durch Treibhausgase zurückzuführen. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/apr/18/lethal-heatwave-in-sahel-worsened-by-fossil-fuel-burning-study-finds

      Zur Studie: https://www.worldweatherattribution.org/extreme-sahel-heatwave-that-hit-highly-vulnerable-population-at-the-end-of-ramadan-would-not-have-occurred-without-climate-change/

    1. mbine weekly drought and heatwave information for 26 climate divisions across the globe, employing historical and projected model output from eight Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 GCMs and three Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Statistically significant trends are revealed in the CDHW characteristics for both recent observed and model simulated future period (2020 to 2099). East Africa, North Australia, East North America, Central Asia, Central Europe, and Southeastern South America show the greatest increase in frequency through the late 21st century. The Southern Hemisphere displa

      Wenn sich die globale Erhitzung fortsetzt, wird die Anzahl kombinierter Dürren und Überflutungen zunehmen. Dabei gehört Mitteleuropa zu den besonders betroffenen Regionen. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2219825120 (via CarbonBrief)

  13. Feb 2024
    1. for - climate crisis - interview - Neil degrasse Tyson - Gavin Schmidt - 2023 record heat - NASA explanation

      podcast details - title: How 2023 broke our climate models - host: Neil degrasse Tyson & Paul Mercurio - guest: NASA director, Gavin Schmidt - date: Jan 2024

      summary - Neil degrasse and his cohost Paul Mercurio interview NASA director Gavin Schmidt to discuss the record-breaking global heating in 2023 and 2024. - Neil and Paul cover a lot in this short interview including: - NASA models can't explain the large jump in temperature in 2023 / 2024. Yes, they predicted incremental increases, but not such large jumps. Gavin finds this worrying. - PACE satellite launches this month, to gather important data on the state of aerosols around the planet. This infomration can help characterize more precisely the role aerosols are playing in global heating. - geoengineering with aerosols is not considered a good idea by Gavin, as it essentially means once started, and if it works to cool the planet, we would be dependent on them for centuries. - Gavin stresses the need for a cohesive collective solution, but that it's beyond him how we achieve that given all the denailsim and misinformation that influeces policy out there.

  14. Jan 2024
  15. Dec 2023
    1. next year we we'll know whether your your your numbers are right in your pipeline paper around May of next year 01:46:30 and then it's going to be a very warm year it's going to be a lot of Destruction then we need we need to see how far the temperature Falls with the elino with the linia that follows but I 01:46:42 I expect it's not going to fall as much as you would otherwise have expected because of the large planetary energy balance there's more energy coming in than going out so it's hard for the 01:46:55 linia to cool it off as much as it used to
      • for:May 2024 - James Hansen prediction, extreme weather event - May 2024 - Hansen 2023 paper, prediction - extreme weather 2024
    1. we're getting a taste of that in the pandemic yes you adopt a wartime or emergency mindset that helps to liberate a kind of level 00:15:22 of collective purpose it makes new things possible
      • for: polycrisis wartime mobilization, climate crisis wartime mobilization, 2024 extreme weather - wartime mobilization opportunity

      • key insight

      • adjacency between
        • real COVID mobilization
        • imagined future climate crisis wartime mobilization
      • adjacency statement

        • The rapid response to the COVID pandemic was a real life case of a wartime scale mobilization in a very short time. This shows that it is possible. We need to see if we can strive for this for climate change. If 2024 becomes the year of extreme weather due to El Nino, then we could use it as an opportunity for a wartime mobilization

        • one good thing about the COVID pandemic is that it did show that a rapid wartime mobilization is possible, because it did kind of happened during COVID

  16. Nov 2023
  17. Oct 2023
    1. Die Extremwetter-Ereignisse dieses Jahres entsprechen den Vorhersagen der Klimawissenschaft. Der Guardian hat dazu zahlreichende Forschende befragt und viele Statements in einem multimedialen Artikel zusammengestellt. Alle Befragten stimmen darin überein, dass die Verbrennung fossiler Brennstoffe sofort beendet werden muss, um eine weitere Verschlimmerung zu stoppen. Festgestellt wird auch, dass die Verwundbarkeit vieler Communities bisher unterschätzt worden ist. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/aug/28/crazy-off-the-charts-records-has-humanity-finally-broken-the-climate

  18. Sep 2023
      • for: system change, polycrisis, extreme weather, planetary tipping points, climate disruption, climate chaos, tipping point, hothouse earth, new meme, deep transformation
      • title: The Great Disruption has Begun
      • author: Paul Gilding
      • date: Sept 3, 2023
      • source: https://www.paulgilding.com/cockatoo-chronicles/the-great-disruption-has-begun
      • summary

        • good q uick opening paragraphs that summarize the plethora of extreme events in 2023 up to Sept 2023 (but misses the Canadian Wildfires) and also the list of potential planetary tipping points that are giving indication of being at the threshold.
        • He makes a good point about the conservative nature of science that underestimates impacts due to the inertia of scientific study.
        • Coins a good meme
          • Everything, everywhere, all at once
        • He ties all the various crisis together to show the many components of the wicked problem we face
        • finally what it comes down to is that we cannot stop the coming unprecedented changes but we can and must slow it down as much as possible and we should be prepared for a wild ride
      • comment

        • It would be a good educational tool for deep and transformative climate education to map all these elements of the polycrisis and show their feedbacks and interactions, especially how it relates to socio-economic impacts to motivate transformative change and mobilize the urgency now required.
  19. Aug 2023
      • for: extreme weather, realtime extreme weather analysis, World weather attribution
      • description
        • the World Weather Attribution organization is a group of research institutes that provides robust scientific answers to the question:
          • is climate change to blame?
        • when an extreme weather event has occurred
        • This is usually available days to weeks after the event and informs discussions about climate change while the impacts of the events are still fresh in the minds of the public and policymakers.
  20. Jul 2023
  21. Jun 2023
  22. May 2023
  23. Apr 2023
  24. Feb 2023
  25. Nov 2022
  26. Jul 2022
    1. “We shall have a change in the weather before long.”

      Weather has been used before to foreshadow major events. So likely something unexpected or bad will happen with this change in weather.

  27. May 2022

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

  28. Feb 2022
  29. Sep 2021
  30. Aug 2021
    1. ugust 14, 2021, rain was observed at the highest point on the Greenland Ice Sheet for several hours, and air temperatures remained above freezing for about nine hours. This was the third time in less than a decade, and the latest date in the year on record, that the National Science Foundation’s Summit Station had above-freezing temperatures and wet snow. There is no previous report of rainfall at this location (72.58°N 38.46°W), which reaches 3,216 meters (10,551 feet) in elevation. Earlier melt events in the instrumental record occurred in 1995, 2012, and 2019; prior to those events, melting is inferred from ice cores to have been absent since an event in the late 1800s
  31. Jul 2021
  32. Jun 2021
  33. May 2021
  34. Apr 2021
    1. "Weltweit steigt mit dem Klimawandel das Risiko von extremen Regenfällen und Überschwemmungen", fasst Will Steffen von der australischen Nationaluniversität zusammen. Der Professor ist einer der führenden Klimatologen Australiens. "Die globale Durchschnittstemperatur ist bereits um etwa 1,1 Grad Celsius gestiegen. Für jeden Temperaturanstieg von einem Grad kann die Atmosphäre etwa sieben Prozent mehr Wasser aufnehmen", so Steffen
  35. Mar 2021
  36. Dec 2020
    1. My weather camera wbinfo = {} wbinfo.url = "https://www.altocumulus.org/~hallgren/webcam2/?webcamsection="; wbinfo.timestamp = "20201217191630"; wbinfo.request_ts = ""; wbinfo.prefix = "https://via.hypothes.is/"; wbinfo.mod = ""; wbinfo.top_url = "https://via.hypothes.is/https://www.altocumulus.org/~hallgren/webcam2/?webcamsection="; wbinfo.is_framed = false; wbinfo.is_live = true; wbinfo.coll = ""; wbinfo.proxy_magic = ""; wbinfo.static_prefix = "https://via.hypothes.is/static/__pywb"; wbinfo.wombat_ts = "20201217191630"; wbinfo.wombat_scheme = "https"; wbinfo.wombat_host = "www.altocumulus.org"; wbinfo.wombat_sec = "1608232590"; wbinfo.wombat_opts = {"no_rewrite_prefixes": ["http://localhost:5000/", "http://localhost:3001/", "https://localhost:5000/", "https://localhost:3001/", "https://hypothes.is/", "https://qa.hypothes.is/", "https://cdn.hypothes.is/", "/assets/"], "http_cache": "pass"}; if (window && window._WBWombat && !window._wb_js_inited && !window._wb_wombat) { window._wb_wombat = new _WBWombat(wbinfo); } /** * Return `true` if this frame has no ancestors or its nearest ancestor was * not served through Via. * * The implementation relies on all documents proxied through Via sharing the * same origin. */ function isTopViaFrame() { if (window === window.top) { // Trivial case - This is the top-most frame in the tab so it must be the // top Via frame. return true; } try { // Get a reference to the parent frame. Via's "wombat.js" frontend code // monkey-patches `window.parent` in certain cases, in which case // `window.__WB_orig_parent` is the _real_ parent frame. var parent = window.__WB_orig_parent || window.parent; // Try to access the parent frame's location. This will trigger an // exception if the frame comes from a different, non-Via origin. // // This test assumes that all documents proxied through Via are served from // the same origin. If a future change to Via means that is no longer the // case, this function will need to be implemented differently. parent.location.href; // If the access succeeded, the parent frame was proxied through Via and so // this is not the top Via frame. return false; } catch (err) { // If the access failed, the parent frame was not proxied through Via and // so this is the top Via frame. return true; } } function stripFragment(url) { return url.replace(/#.*$/, ''); } /** * Test if a link will navigate to a new page as opposed to scrolling to a * different location within the current page. * * @param {HTMLAnchorElement} linkEl */ function isExternalLink(linkEl) { // Create a link that is definitely internal and compare its absolute URL // to the target link. // // We do this rather than the more obvious comparison of `linkEl.href` to `location.href` // because Via monkey-patches `HTMLAnchorElement.prototype.href` so that it // returns the original (non-proxied) URL and therefore cannot be // compared directly with the real (proxied) URL that `location.href` returns. const internalLink = document.createElement('a'); // nb. `href` always returns an absolute URL when read. internalLink.href = '#'; return stripFragment(internalLink.href) !== stripFragment(linkEl.href); } /** * Setup handling of links to other documents. * * @param {"same-tab"|"new-tab"} mode */ function setupExternalLinkHandler(mode) { if (mode === "new-tab") { document.addEventListener("click", function (event) { if (!event.target.closest) { // Do nothing in browsers that don't support `element.closest` (IE 11). return; } var linkEl = event.target.closest("a"); if (linkEl) { if (isExternalLink(linkEl)) { // Make link open in a new tab. linkEl.target = "_blank"; } } }); } } (function () { if (!isTopViaFrame()) { // Do not inject Hypothesis into iframes in documents proxied through Via. // As well as slowing down the loading of the proxied page even more, this // causes problems with the way that the client "discovers" annotate-able iframes. // // See https://github.com/hypothesis/client/issues/568, // https://github.com/hypothesis/via/issues/119 and // https://github.com/hypothesis/lms/issues/701. return; } // Inject the Hypothesis client. var embed_script = document.createElement("script"); embed_script.src = "https://cdn.hypothes.is/hypothesis"; document.head.appendChild(embed_script); setupExternalLinkHandler("same-tab"); window.hypothesisConfig = function() { return {"showHighlights": true, "appType": "via", "openSidebar": false}; }})(); if (_wb_js) { _wb_js.load(); } My weather camera

      Väderkamera i Göteborg

    2. My weather camera wbinfo = {} wbinfo.url = "https://www.altocumulus.org/~hallgren/webcam2/?webcamsection="; wbinfo.timestamp = "20201217191234"; wbinfo.request_ts = ""; wbinfo.prefix = "https://via.hypothes.is/"; wbinfo.mod = ""; wbinfo.top_url = "https://via.hypothes.is/https://www.altocumulus.org/~hallgren/webcam2/?webcamsection="; wbinfo.is_framed = false; wbinfo.is_live = true; wbinfo.coll = ""; wbinfo.proxy_magic = ""; wbinfo.static_prefix = "https://via.hypothes.is/static/__pywb"; wbinfo.wombat_ts = "20201217191234"; wbinfo.wombat_scheme = "https"; wbinfo.wombat_host = "www.altocumulus.org"; wbinfo.wombat_sec = "1608232354"; wbinfo.wombat_opts = {"no_rewrite_prefixes": ["http://localhost:5000/", "http://localhost:3001/", "https://localhost:5000/", "https://localhost:3001/", "https://hypothes.is/", "https://qa.hypothes.is/", "https://cdn.hypothes.is/", "/assets/"], "http_cache": "pass"}; if (window && window._WBWombat && !window._wb_js_inited && !window._wb_wombat) { window._wb_wombat = new _WBWombat(wbinfo); } /** * Return `true` if this frame has no ancestors or its nearest ancestor was * not served through Via. * * The implementation relies on all documents proxied through Via sharing the * same origin. */ function isTopViaFrame() { if (window === window.top) { // Trivial case - This is the top-most frame in the tab so it must be the // top Via frame. return true; } try { // Get a reference to the parent frame. Via's "wombat.js" frontend code // monkey-patches `window.parent` in certain cases, in which case // `window.__WB_orig_parent` is the _real_ parent frame. var parent = window.__WB_orig_parent || window.parent; // Try to access the parent frame's location. This will trigger an // exception if the frame comes from a different, non-Via origin. // // This test assumes that all documents proxied through Via are served from // the same origin. If a future change to Via means that is no longer the // case, this function will need to be implemented differently. parent.location.href; // If the access succeeded, the parent frame was proxied through Via and so // this is not the top Via frame. return false; } catch (err) { // If the access failed, the parent frame was not proxied through Via and // so this is the top Via frame. return true; } } function stripFragment(url) { return url.replace(/#.*$/, ''); } /** * Test if a link will navigate to a new page as opposed to scrolling to a * different location within the current page. * * @param {HTMLAnchorElement} linkEl */ function isExternalLink(linkEl) { // Create a link that is definitely internal and compare its absolute URL // to the target link. // // We do this rather than the more obvious comparison of `linkEl.href` to `location.href` // because Via monkey-patches `HTMLAnchorElement.prototype.href` so that it // returns the original (non-proxied) URL and therefore cannot be // compared directly with the real (proxied) URL that `location.href` returns. const internalLink = document.createElement('a'); // nb. `href` always returns an absolute URL when read. internalLink.href = '#'; return stripFragment(internalLink.href) !== stripFragment(linkEl.href); } /** * Setup handling of links to other documents. * * @param {"same-tab"|"new-tab"} mode */ function setupExternalLinkHandler(mode) { if (mode === "new-tab") { document.addEventListener("click", function (event) { if (!event.target.closest) { // Do nothing in browsers that don't support `element.closest` (IE 11). return; } var linkEl = event.target.closest("a"); if (linkEl) { if (isExternalLink(linkEl)) { // Make link open in a new tab. linkEl.target = "_blank"; } } }); } } (function () { if (!isTopViaFrame()) { // Do not inject Hypothesis into iframes in documents proxied through Via. // As well as slowing down the loading of the proxied page even more, this // causes problems with the way that the client "discovers" annotate-able iframes. // // See https://github.com/hypothesis/client/issues/568, // https://github.com/hypothesis/via/issues/119 and // https://github.com/hypothesis/lms/issues/701. return; } // Inject the Hypothesis client. var embed_script = document.createElement("script"); embed_script.src = "https://cdn.hypothes.is/hypothesis"; document.head.appendChild(embed_script); setupExternalLinkHandler("same-tab"); window.hypothesisConfig = function() { return {"showHighlights": true, "appType": "via", "openSidebar": false}; }})(); if (_wb_js) { _wb_js.load(); } My weather camera

      Väderkamera i Krokslätt, Mölndal, Göteborg Weather camera in Krokslätt, Mölndal, Gothenburg

  37. Aug 2020
  38. Jul 2020
  39. Jun 2020
  40. May 2020
  41. Apr 2020
  42. Mar 2019
  43. Feb 2018
  44. May 2017
    1. But when it comes to weather prediction, America lags behind a European prediction model that does a better job at telling us how warm or cold it will be three to 10 days out.

      I wasn't aware of this. Curious!

    1. Mackenzie Highway
      The Mackenzie Highway is the longest in the Northwest Territories. It begins at the Northwest Territory and Alberta border and ends at Wrigley, Northwest Territory. It is approximately 690 kilometers or 429 miles long. About 280 kilometers are paved while the rest of the highway is covered with gravel (Government of Northwest Territories, n.d.). The construction of this highway was ongoing between the 1940s and 1970s. In 1945, the Canadian federal government and the government of Alberta signed an agreement to build an all-weather road that would replace the existing Caterpillar tractor trails from Grimshaw to the Great Slave Lake of Hay River (Prince of Wales Northern Heritage Center, n.d.). As time passed and focus shifted to fossil fuel collection, the motivation behind further construction of the Mackenzie Highway was in “anticipation of a major oil pipeline development along the Mackenzie River valley” (Pomeroy, 1985). The intended use of the highway was to enable the pipeline developers to haul construction materials throughout the area. During its construction, many chiefs of the Indian Brotherhood opposed the completion of the Mackenzie Highway. There was additional opposition voiced from the people of Wrigley who also did not support further construction of the Mackenzie Highway (Cox, 1975). 
      

      References

      Cox, B. (1975). Changing Perceptions of Industrial Development in the North. Human Organization, 27-33.

      Government of Northwest Territories. (n.d.). Transportation Highway 1. Retrieved from Government of Northwest Territories: http://www.dot.gov.nt.ca/Highways/Highway_System/NWTHwy1

      Pomeroy, J. (1985). An Identification of Environmental Disturbances from Road Developments in Subarctic Muskeg. Arctic, 104-111.

      Prince of Wales Northern Heritage Center. (n.d.). Historical Timeline of the Northwest Territories. Retrieved from Prince of Wales Northern Heritage Center: http://www.nwttimeline.ca/1925/1948_MackenzieHighway.htm

  45. Mar 2017
    1. Shell

      The decision to veto the proposed pipeline in accordance with Mr. Berger’s recommendation substantially slowed, but did not stop the search for oil in the Arctic. Over the next 40 years, oil companies such as Shell, Exxon, and Chevron would continue their search in a region expected to contain 13% of the world’s undiscovered oil and 30% of its natural gas.1 But in 2015, Shell, the last remaining company in the American Arctic, announced it would halt its exploratory drilling. This would mark the end of their $7 billion venture into Alaska’s Chuckchi Sea. The well, the Burger J, stretched to a depth of 6,800 feet and showed indications of oil and gas, but amid relatively low oil prices, less than $50 a barrel, and the expense necessary to drill in this section of the ocean they have decided to cease operations. The company originally planned on drill two wells to greater than 8,000 feet, but in the wake of Shell grounding its Kulluck drilling rig, this number was halved by President Obama’s administration.2 This grounding was found to be, in part, the result of Shell’s ill-fated attempt to avoid paying millions of dollars in tax liability. Fortune’s Jon Birger noted in his visit to the rig after it was grounded that it was well prepared to prevent the incident that destroyed BP’s Deepwater Horizon, but, startlingly, was less equipped to deal with the unique weather conditions posed by drilling in the Arctic.3 The Berger report may not have halted Shell’s Artic exploration but a combination of regulatory restrictions and low oil prices seem to have done just that.

      1. Lavelle, Marianne. "Coast Guard blames Shell risk-taking in Kulluk rig accident." National Geographic. April 4, 2014. Accessed March 7, 2017. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2014/04/140404-coast-guard-blames-shell-in-kulluk-rig-accident/.
      2. Koch, Wendy. "3 reasons why Shell halted drilling in the Arctic." National Geographic. September 28, 2015. Accessed March 7, 2017. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/energy/2015/09/150928-3-reasons-shell-halted-drilling-in-the-arctic/.
      3. Birger, Jon. "What I learned aboard Shell's grounded Alaskan oil rig." Fortune. January 3, 2013. Accessed March 7, 2017. http://fortune.com/2013/01/03/what-i-learned-aboard-shells-grounded-alaskan-oil-rig/.
  46. Nov 2016
  47. Jul 2016
    1. Charney determined that the impracticality of Richardson’s methods could be overcome by using the new computers and a revised set of equations, filtering out sound and gravity waves in order to simplify the calculations and focus on the phenomena of most importance to predicting the evolution of continent-scale weather systems.

      The complexity of the forecasting problem was initially overcome in the 1940's both by an improved rate of calculation (using computers) and by simplifying the models to focus on the most important factors.

    2. Despite the advances made by Richardson, it took him, working alone, several months to produce a wildly inaccurate six-hour forecast for an area near Munich, Germany. In fact, some of the changes predicted in Richardson’s forecast could never occur under any known terrestrial conditions.

      Nice concise description of the poor performance and impracticality of early weather forecasting.

  48. Mar 2016