- Last 7 days
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Teresa M Bejan - Wikipedia, English
site:: [[Wikipedia]] url:: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teresa_Bejan accessed:: 2023-12-02 19:20
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Richard Bourke (1965-) - Wikipedia, English
site:: [[Wikipedia]] url:: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Bourke_(academic) accessed:: 2023-12-02 19:00
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Handel (1685-1759) - Wikipedia, English
site:: [[Wikipedia]] url:: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Frideric_Handel accessed:: 2023-12-02 18:05
-
-
es.wikipedia.org es.wikipedia.org
-
Brunetto Latini (1220-1294 o 1295) (Wikipedia, Español)
site:: [[Wikipedia]]
url:: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brunetto_Latini
accessed:: 2023-12-02 17:10
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Giambattista Vico (1668-1744) (Wikipedia, English)
site:: [[Wikipedia]]
url:: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giambattista_Vico
accessed:: 2023-12-02 17:00
-
-
zh.wikipedia.org zh.wikipedia.org
-
基於變換器的雙向編碼器表示技術（英語：Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers，BERT）是用於自然語言處理（NLP）的預訓練技術，由Google提出。[1][2]2018年，雅各布·德夫林和同事建立並發布了BERT。Google正在利用BERT來更好地理解使用者搜尋語句的語意。[3] 2020年的一項文獻調查得出結論：「在一年多一點的時間裡，BERT已經成為NLP實驗中無處不在的基線」，算上分析和改進模型的研究出版物超過150篇。[4] 最初的英語BERT發布時提供兩種類型的預訓練模型[1]：（1）BERTBASE模型，一個12層，768維，12個自注意頭（self attention head），110M參數的神經網路結構；（2）BERTLARGE模型，一個24層，1024維，16個自注意頭，340M參數的神經網路結構。兩者的訓練語料都是BooksCorpus[5]以及英語維基百科語料，單詞量分別是8億以及25億。
BERT
-
-
es.wikipedia.org es.wikipedia.org
-
Rius (Eduardo del Río) (1934-2017) (Wikipedia - es)
site:: [[Wikipedia]]
url:: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduardo_del_R%C3%ADo
accessed:: 2023-11-27 16:55
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Neotropical realm (Wikipedia - en)
site:: Wikipedia
url:: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neotropical_realm
accessed:: 2023-27-11 16:50
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Biogeographic realm (Wikipedia - en)
site:: Wikipedia
url:: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biogeographic_realm
accessed:: 2023-11-27 16:45
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Biogeography (Wikipedia - en)
site:: [[Wikipedia]]
url:: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biogeography
accessed:: 2023-11-27 16:45
-
- Nov 2023
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
John Atkinson Hobson (1858-1940)
Wikipedia (en)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._A._Hobson
accessed:: 2023-11-25 20:00
-
-
es.wikipedia.org es.wikipedia.org
-
Sergio Beltrán López
Wikipedia (es)
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergio_Beltr%C3%A1n_L%C3%B3pez
accessed:: 2023-11-25 14:00
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Gabriel Le Bras
Wikipedia (en)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabriel_Le_Bras
accessed:: 2023-11-25 11:45
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Georges Friedmann
Wikipedia (en)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Friedmann
accessed:: 2023-11-25 02:50
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
David Hilbert
Wikipedia (en)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hilbert
accessed:: 2023-11-24 23:40
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Kojin Karatani (1941- )
Wikipedia (en)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kojin_Karatani
accessed:: 2023-11-22 16:!0
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Jun Tosaka (1900-1945)
Wikipedia (en)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jun_Tosaka
accessed:: 2023-11-22 16:00
-
-
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
-
Cannot get it either to be honest. I want to use the antinet method for 2 main topics: Management and Personal growthIn management, for sure needs to add notion of leadership for example: how to approach the coding identification? I’ve assigned 2000 to management: shall I assign 2500 to all cards related to leadership? This is just an example, it’s a bit unclear for me so far.
reply to u/marco89lcdm at https://www.reddit.com/r/antinet/comments/17m7ggz/comment/k839k22/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
The way you're currently thinking is a top down approach in which you already know everything and you're attempting to organize it to make it easier for others who know nothing about the ideas to find them. The Luhmann model supposes you know nothing about anything to begin with and you're attempting to create order from the bottom up, solely by putting related ideas you're building on close to each other and giving them numbers so that you might find them again when you need them.
If your only use is for those two topics and closely related subtopics and nothing else, then consider not using a Luhmann-artig model? Leave off the numbers and create two tabbed cards with those headings (and possibly related subheadings) and then sort your related cards behind them. (This is closer to the commonplace book tradition maintained on index cards and used by those like Mortimer J. Adler et al., Robert Greene, Ryan Holiday and Billy Oppenheimer. Example: https://billyoppenheimer.com/notecard-system/)
Otherwise the mistake you may be making is mentally associating the top level numbers with the topics. Break this habit! The numbers are only there so you can index ideas against them to be able to find them again! These numbers aren't like the Dewey Decimal system where 510.### will always mean something to do with math. You'll specifically want to intermingle disparate topics, so the only purpose the numbers provide is the ability to find what you're looking for by using the index which will give you a neighborhood in which you'll find the ideas you know are going to be hiding there or very near by.
Cards that are near to each other (using the numbers as an idea of ordering and re-finding) create a neighborhood of related ideas, even if they're disparate in topics. This might allow you to intermingle two related ideas, one which is in anthropology and another from mathematics for example, but which would otherwise potentially be thousands of cards away from each other if done in a Dewey-like system.
Or to take your example, what do you do with an idea that relates to both management AND personal growth? If it's closer to an idea on management you might place it near a related idea on that branch rather than in the personal growth section where it may be potentially less useful in the future. (You can always cross index them if need be, but place it where it creates the closest link and thus likely the greatest value for building on top of your previous ideas.)
For more on this, try: https://boffosocko.com/2022/10/27/thoughts-on-zettelkasten-numbering-systems/
I suspect that Scheper suggests using the Academic Outline of Disciplines as a numbering structure because it's an early choice he made for himself and it provides a perch to give people a concrete place to start. Sadly this does a disservice because it's closer to the older commonplace topical method rather than to the spirit of the ordering that Luhmann was doing. It's especially difficult for beginners who have a natural tendency to want to do this sort of top-down approach.
-
- Oct 2023
-
twitter.com twitter.comTwitter2
-
Like (Rap)Genius but for the internet.
Example: Hypothesis Plug In.
-
Wikipedia is inherently hierarchical and therefore subject to the biases of higher ranking editors, independent of their merits.
True, but it should never be taken as the authoritative voice and there are ways to annotate on the internet :)
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
fr.wikipedia.org fr.wikipedia.org
-
-
Federated SPARQL Query, incorporating data from both DBpedia & Wikidata
```sparql PREFIX wd: http://www.wikidata.org/entity/ PREFIX wdt: http://www.wikidata.org/prop/direct/ PREFIX wikibase: http://wikiba.se/ontology# PREFIX p: http://www.wikidata.org/prop/ PREFIX ps: http://www.wikidata.org/prop/statement/ PREFIX pq: http://www.wikidata.org/prop/qualifier/ PREFIX bd: http://www.bigdata.com/rdf# PREFIX owl: http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl# PREFIX rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema# PREFIX foaf: http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/ PREFIX dct: http://purl.org/dc/terms/SELECT DISTINCT ?dbpediaID AS ?href xsd:string(?label) AS ?name ?description ?subjectText ?item AS ?wikidataID ?dbpediaID ?image ?picture WHERE { SERVICE http://query.wikidata.org/sparql { SELECT DISTINCT ?item ?itemLabel ?numero ( SAMPLE(?pic) AS ?picture ) WHERE { ?item p:P528 ?catalogStatement . ?catalogStatement ps:P528 ?numero . ?catalogStatement pq:P972 wd:Q14530 . OPTIONAL { ?item wdt:P18 ?pic } . SERVICE wikibase:label { bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "en" } } GROUP BY ?item ?itemLabel ?numero ORDER BY ?numero }
SERVICE <http://dbpedia.org/sparql> { SELECT ?item ?dbpediaID ?label ?image ?description ?subjectText FROM <http://dbpedia.org> WHERE { ?dbpediaID owl:sameAs ?item ; rdfs:label ?label ; foaf:depiction ?image ; rdfs:comment ?description ; dct:subject [ rdfs:label ?subjectText ] . FILTER ( LANG(?label) = "en" ) FILTER ( LANG(?description) = "en" ) } }} ```
-
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
meta.wikimedia.org meta.wikimedia.org
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
- Aug 2023
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Jun 2023
-
learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet01-xythos.content.blackboardcdn.com learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet01-xythos.content.blackboardcdn.com
-
so far as generalaccuracy of content is concerned, Wikipedia is comparable to conventionally compiledencyclopedias, including Britannica.
This information definitely changed my opinions and views of Wikipedia. I feel like all throughout high school I was taught that Wikipedia was not a scholarly source so I always avoided looking on there because I didn't think it was accurate but reading the results of this study and the article attached about this study has changed my views of Wikipedia.
-
-
inst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net inst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net
-
There are now about 22,000 contributorsto the site, which charges between $1 and $5 per basic image
This reminds me of the article "Wikipedia and the Death of an Expert" how there are also so many volunteers running the wikipedia page. I inserted an article that mentions how many active editors there are on wikipedia so we can really compare the similarities in contributors.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.wikiverse.io www.wikiverse.io
-
-
query.wikidata.org query.wikidata.org
-
- May 2023
-
dbpedia.org dbpedia.org
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
dbpedia.org dbpedia.org
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
-
Extended numbering and why use Outline of Disciplines at all? .t3_13eyg8p._2FCtq-QzlfuN-SwVMUZMM3 { --postTitle-VisitedLinkColor: #9b9b9b; --postTitleLink-VisitedLinkColor: #9b9b9b; --postBodyLink-VisitedLinkColor: #989898; } Several things:Why are there different listings for the Academic Outline of Disciplines? Some starts the top level with Humanities and other start with Arts which changes the numbering?I am createing an Antinet for all things. Some of the levels of the AOOD has more then 9 items so Scott's 4 digit system would not work. For some levels I would have to use two digits. Thoughts?Why even use said system? Why is it a bad reason to just start with #1 that indicates the first subject sequence, #2 for a different subject etc..?
reply to u/drogers8 at https://www.reddit.com/r/antinet/comments/13eyg8p/extended_numbering_and_why_use_outline_of/
Based on my research, Scott Scheper was the one of the original source for people adopting the Academic Outline of Disciplines. I've heard him say before that he recommends it only as a potential starting place for people who are new to the space and need it as a crutch to get going. It's an odd suggestion as almost all of the rest of his system is so Luhmann-based. I suspect it's a quirk of how he personally started and once moving it was easier than starting over. He also used his own ZK for showing others, and it's hard to say one thing in a teaching video when showing people something else. Ultimately it's hard to mess up on numbering choices unless you're insistent on using only whole numbers or natural numbers. I generally wouldn't suggest complex numbers either, but you might find some interesting things within your system if you did. More detail: https://boffosocko.com/2022/10/27/thoughts-on-zettelkasten-numbering-systems/ The only reason to have any standardized base or standardized numbers would be if you were attempting to have a large shared ZK with others. If this is your intent, then perhaps look at the Universal Decimal Classification, though a variety of things might also work including Dewey Decimal.
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
databus.dbpedia.org databus.dbpedia.org
-
eprints.rclis.org eprints.rclis.org
- Apr 2023
-
fr.wikipedia.org fr.wikipedia.org
- Mar 2023
-
memex.marginalia.nu memex.marginalia.nu
-
occidental.substack.com occidental.substack.com
-
Scott Scheper has popularized a numbering scheme based on Wikipedia's Outline of Academic Disciplines.
It's not just me who's noticed this.
Interesting that for someone propounding Luhmann's zettelkasten system that Scheper has done this. Was it because he did it himself and then didn't want to change (likely) or because he spent time seeing others' problems with Luhmann's numbering system and designed a better way (less likely)?
-
- Feb 2023
-
fr.wikipedia.org fr.wikipedia.org
-
fr.wikipedia.org fr.wikipedia.org
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Jan 2023
-
librarycarpentry.org librarycarpentry.org
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
wikimediafoundation.org wikimediafoundation.org
-
Research has shown that limiting the width of longform text leads to a more comfortable reading experience, and better retention of the content itself.
-
-
wikimediafoundation.org wikimediafoundation.org
-
In 2022, a global digital trends report revealed that the number of people who are not connected to the internet dropped below 3 billion for the first time.
-
- Dec 2022
-
bildungundgutesleben.wordpress.com bildungundgutesleben.wordpress.com
-
en Konsens in der Profession. Wenn es keinen Konsens zu einem Thema gibt, wäre es eine Aufgabe, die unterschiedlichen Positionen darzustellen und zu sagen, warum es diese gibt.
=Wikipedia
-
- Nov 2022
-
www.wikiverse.io www.wikiverse.io
-
An independent initiative made by Owen Cornec who has also made many other beautiful data visualizations. Wikiverse vividly captures the fact that Wikipedia is a an awe-inspiring universe to explore.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Contents 1 Overview 2 Reasons for failure 2.1 Overconfidence and complacency 2.1.1 Natural tendency 2.1.2 The illusion of control 2.1.3 Anchoring 2.1.4 Competitor neglect 2.1.5 Organisational pressure 2.1.6 Machiavelli factor 2.2 Dogma, ritual and specialisation 2.2.1 Frames become blinders 2.2.2 Processes become routines 2.2.3 Resources become millstones 2.2.4 Relationships become shackles 2.2.5 Values becomes dogmas 3 The paradox of information systems 3.1 The irrationality of rationality 3.2 How computers can be destructive 3.3 Recommendations for practice 4 Case studies 4.1 Fresh & Easy 4.2 Firestone Tire and Rubber Company 4.3 Laura Ashley 4.4 Xerox 5 See also 6 References
Wiki table of contents of the Icarus paradox
-
- Oct 2022
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Several templates and tools are available to assist in formatting, such as Reflinks (documentation), reFill (documentation) and Citation bot (documentation)
I clicked the link for reFill and thought it looked interesting. Would like to look into this further.
-
- Aug 2022
-
www.newscientist.com www.newscientist.com
-
Sparkes, M. (2021, November 19). Wikipedia tests AI for spotting contradictory claims in articles. New Scientist. https://institutions.newscientist.com/article/2298169-wikipedia-tests-ai-for-spotting-contradictory-claims-in-articles/?utm_campaign=echobox&utm_medium=social&utm_source=Twitter&utm_term=Autofeed
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
On the Internet there are many collective projects where users interact only by modifying local parts of their shared virtual environment. Wikipedia is an example of this.[17][18] The massive structure of information available in a wiki,[19] or an open source software project such as the FreeBSD kernel[19] could be compared to a termite nest; one initial user leaves a seed of an idea (a mudball) which attracts other users who then build upon and modify this initial concept, eventually constructing an elaborate structure of connected thoughts.[20][21]
Just as eusocial creatures like termites create pheromone infused mudballs which evolve into pillars, arches, chambers, etc., a single individual can maintain a collection of notes (a commonplace book, a zettelkasten) which contains memetic seeds of ideas (highly interesting to at least themselves). Working with this collection over time and continuing to add to it, modify it, link to it, and expand it will create a complex living community of thoughts and ideas.
Over time this complexity involves to create new ideas, new structures, new insights.
Allowing this pattern to move from a single person and note collection to multiple people and multiple collections will tend to compound this effect and accelerate it, particularly with digital tools and modern high speed communication methods.
(Naturally the key is to prevent outside selfish interests from co-opting this behavior, eg. corporate social media.)
-
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
These are the key parameters.
prop=revisions&rvprop=content&rvsection=0rvsection = 0specifies to only return the lead section.
-
-
www.washingtonpost.com www.washingtonpost.com
-
The academic research that was footnoted in the Wikipedia articles was found to be cited more often in subsequent academic publications, as well.
Academic research used in Wikipedia articles drives more citations
-
- Jul 2022
-
www.vice.com www.vice.com
-
“Vandalism or other negative behavior can happen from time to time on Wikipedia, as is expected with any open, online platform that is available for everyone to contribute to. With that said, this specific type of behavior on Wikipedia is not common,” they added.
-
- Jun 2022
-
docdrop.org docdrop.org
-
wikipedia ist fluide könnte man sagen es ist insofern fluide als es permanent am wachsen ist
-
frei deutet darauf hin dass es hier mit partizipation zu tun hat und partizipation ist natürlich ein ganz stark aktivistische praktisch handlungsfähiges moment
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
-
im idealfall ich sag nur medial voll da 00:08:39 ist nicht alles perfekt handelt es sich dabei also um ein demokratisches unterfangen
Siehe Böhmermanns investigative Recherche zur Missbrauchsanfälligkeit von Wikipedia - also nur für ein Beispiel der Abweichung vom Idealfall
-
wikipedia und das ist in meinen augen ein paradigma für die erkenntnistheorie die app is technologie der digitalität
Wikipedia als Paradigma für die Erkenntnistheorie des Internets
-
- May 2022
-
mappings.dbpedia.org mappings.dbpedia.org
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
fr.wikipedia.org fr.wikipedia.org
- Apr 2022
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
(6) ReconfigBehSci on Twitter: “@MichaelPaulEdw1 @islaut1 @ToddHorowitz3 @richarddmorey @MaartenvSmeden and not just misguided (as too simplistic) but part of the problem....” / Twitter. (n.d.). Retrieved February 24, 2021, from https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1356528429211021319
-
-
www.gabormelli.com www.gabormelli.com
-
tagme.d4science.org tagme.d4science.org
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.mediawiki.org www.mediawiki.org
-
wik2dict is a tool written in Python that converts MediaWiki SQL dumps into the DICT format. The script is available under the GNU General Public License. It is also capable of downloading Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Wikiquote, Wikinews and Wikibooks SQL dumps.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
fr.wikipedia.org fr.wikipedia.org
- Mar 2022
-
human.libretexts.org human.libretexts.org
-
You probably know by now that if you cite Wikipedia as an authoritative source, the wrath of your professor shall be visited upon you. Why is it that even the most informative Wikipedia articles are still often considered illegitimate? And what are good sources to use? The table below summarizes types of secondary sources in four tiers. All sources have their legitimate uses, but the top-tier ones are preferable for citation.
Even though Wikipedia is a popular online encyclopedia worldwide, I still should not believe everything I read on the Internet.
-
-
Local file Local file
-
Wikipedia has an excellent page on metacognition, which notes that “metacognition is classified into three components”:
-
-
www.programmableweb.com www.programmableweb.com
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
-
So my idea was to create a machine-tag format based on Wikipedia topics, allowing any content creator to tag content with any topic in Wikipedia. By using Wikipedia as an index, this format provides very specific identification of content across a vast knowledge domain. Call it the Dewey Decimal System for the web: “The Wiki Decimal System.” In general, the problem with machine tags is how to make them easy to add for regular folks. Although the format itself is simple, the tags are typically lengthy and require you to know the data ID for what you want to tag. Enter my hack: A web page that takes your text and builds the list of Wikipedia machine tags automatically.
-
- Feb 2022
-
fr.wikipedia.org fr.wikipedia.org
-
tribe-against-machine.org tribe-against-machine.org
-
tribe against machine - shih wei chieh
-
-
tribe-against-machine.org tribe-against-machine.org
-
hff2020.wiki
-
- Jan 2022
-
www.golem.de www.golem.de
- Dec 2021
-
github.com github.com
-
This code creates a simple web site that queries Wikipedia to get the edit history of a page and renders it as a "history flow" in SVG.
<figure>
</figure>
-
-
researchweb.watson.ibm.com researchweb.watson.ibm.com
-
visualizing the editing history of Wikipedia pages
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Removing the navigational toolbar
[...]
For example, here is an archived post discussing the id_ identity flag. This is a normal link to the Wayback Machine, which renders with the navigational toolbar:
Here is the same archived page, with the i<var>d_</var> identity flag added to the link. This does not include the toolbar, but now the page renders poorly because of the broken references:
Finally, here is the same archived page, with the <var>if_</var> iframe flag instead. This renders perfectly, without the toolbar:
Since this is the most faithful reproduction of the original web page, please use the <var>if_</var> iframe flag for links to specific archive copies!
-
Editors are encouraged to add an archive link as a part of each citation, or at least submit the referenced URL for archiving, at the same time that each citation is created or updated. New URLs added to Wikipedia articles (but not other pages) are usually automatically archived by a bot.
[...]
In short, this is the code that needs to be added to an existing {{cite web}} or similar template:
<ref>{{cite ... <!--EXISTING REFERENCE--> |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/<date>/http://www.originalurl.com |archive-date=<date> |url-status=dead}}</ref>
-
- Nov 2021
-
site.pennpress.org site.pennpress.org
-
Though firmly rooted in Renaissance culture, Knight's carefully calibrated arguments also push forward to the digital present—engaging with the modern library archives where these works were rebound and remade, and showing how the custodianship of literary artifacts shapes our canons, chronologies, and contemporary interpretative practices.
This passage reminds me of a conversation on 2021-11-16 at Liquid Margins with Will T. Monroe (@willtmonroe) about using Sönke Ahrens' book Smart Notes and Hypothes.is as a structure for getting groups of people (compared to Ahrens' focus on a single person) to do collection, curation, and creation of open education resources (OER).
Here Jeffrey Todd Knight sounds like he's looking at it from the perspective of one (or maybe two) creators in conjunction (curator and binder/publisher) while I'm thinking about expanding behond
This sort of pattern can also be seen in Mortimer J. Adler's group zettelkasten used to create The Great Books of the Western World series as well in larger wiki-based efforts like Wikipedia, so it's not new, but the question is how a teacher (or other leader) can help to better organize a community of creators around making larger works from smaller pieces. Robin DeRosa's example of using OER in the classroom is another example, but there, the process sounded much more difficult and manual.
This is the sort of piece that Vannevar Bush completely missed as a mode of creation and research in his conceptualization of the Memex. Perhaps we need the "Inventiex" as a mode of larger group means of "inventio" using these methods in a digital setting?
-
-
wiki.elte-dh.hu wiki.elte-dh.hu
-
Stilometria
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Oct 2021
-
arxiv.org arxiv.org
-
Yang, P., & Colavizza, G. (2021). A Map of Science in Wikipedia. ArXiv:2110.13790 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.13790
-
- Sep 2021
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:The_deadline_is_now
I'd never run across some of this sort of Wikipedia philosophy before. Perhaps useful for the future?
-
-
- Jul 2021
-
-
Yasseri, T., & Menczer, F. (2021). Can the Wikipedia moderation model rescue the social marketplace of ideas? ArXiv:2104.13754 [Physics]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.13754
-
-
www.theatlantic.com www.theatlantic.com
-
The CDC Should Be More Like Wikipedia—The Atlantic. (n.d.). Retrieved July 23, 2021, from https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/07/cdc-should-be-more-like-wikipedia/619469/
-
- Jun 2021
-
blog.archive.org blog.archive.org
-
For example, the Wikipedia article on Martin Luther King, Jr cites the book To Redeem the Soul of America, by Adam Fairclough. That citation now links directly to page 299 inside the digital version of the book provided by the Internet Archive. There are 66 cited and linked books on that article alone.
I'd love to have a commonplace book robot that would do this sort of linking process within it for me. In the meanwhile, I continue to plod along.
This article was referenced today at [[I Annotate 2021]] by [[Mark Graham]].
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
If you find a suitable archive URL, then you can add it to the citation. If the citation uses one of the common templates (e.g. {{cite web}}, {{cite news}}, {{Citation}}), then you can edit as follows: Leave the |url= unchanged, pointing to the source URL. Add |archive-url=, pointing to the archive URL. Add |archive-date=, specifying the date when the archived copy was saved. YYYY-MM-DD format is usually easiest but any format can be used. Add or change |url-status=. Use |url-status=dead if the old URL does not work. Use |url-status=unfit or |url-status=usurped if the old URL has been usurped for the purposes of spam, advertising, or is otherwise unsuitable. Use |url-status=live if |url= still works and still gives the correct information, but you want to preemptively add an |archive-url=. Leave the |access-date= unchanged, referring to the date when a previous editor last accessed the |url=. Some editors believe |access-date= should be removed once a working |archive-url= is established since the |url= is no longer available, maintaining an |access-date= is redundant clutter.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- May 2021
-
www.wired.com www.wired.com
-
The volunteers who received recognition for their efforts were 20 percent more likely to volunteer for Wikipedia again in the following month and 13 percent more likely than those who earned no praise to be active on Wikipedia a year later.
Jana Gallus, an economist studying for her doctorate at the University of Zurich ran a test on gamification of Wikipedia that showed a 20 percent jump in volunteerism over a month and 13 percent over a control for a year.
-
- Apr 2021
-
history4today.com history4today.com
-
-
Adolf Eichmann
From Wikipedia:
Otto Adolf Eichmann was a German-Austrian SS-Obersturmbannführer and one of the major organizers of the Holocaust—the "Final Solution to the Jewish Question" in Nazi terminology.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Mar 2021
-
www.poetryfoundation.org www.poetryfoundation.org
-
bop
-
Bessie
-
-
blogs.sciencemag.org blogs.sciencemag.org
-
Scholars reflect on Wikipedia’s 20 years of crowdsourced knowledge | Books, Et Al. (n.d.). Retrieved March 3, 2021, from https://blogs.sciencemag.org/books/2020/11/02/wikipedia-at-20/?utm_campaign=SciMag&utm_source=JHubbard&utm_medium=Twitter
-
- Feb 2021
-
www.economist.com www.economist.com
-
Keeping Wikipedia’s culture healthy means moving with the times. “Wikipedia is a child of the desktop internet,” says Mr Negrin. But “increasingly, when people talk about internet users, they’re talking about smartphones.” So the foundation is improving the site’s mobile-editing tools. Typing long articles on a smartphone is inescapably awkward, so attention has focused on helping users to make “micro-edits”, such as fixing spelling mistakes or correcting dates. The hope is that this will also act as a gateway drug for young editors and for those in poorer countries for whom smartphones are the standard or only way of getting online.
保持维基百科的文化健康，意味着与时俱进。"维基百科是桌面互联网的产物，"尼格林先生说。但 "越来越多的人在谈论互联网用户时，他们在说智能手机"。所以基金会正在改进网站的移动编辑工具。在智能手机上输入长文章无疑是一件尴尬的事情，所以人们把注意力集中在帮助用户进行 "微编辑"（micro-edits）上，比如修正拼写错误或更正日期。人们希望，这也将成为年轻编辑和那些在较贫穷国家使用智能手机上网的标准或唯一方式的捷径。
-
- Jan 2021
-
www.vice.com www.vice.com
- Nov 2020
-
meta.wikimedia.org meta.wikimedia.org
-
Wikipedia is a story of success, and its long-term contributors are volunteers who have created the most valuable resource for learning we have ever encountered. However, our communities are not yet representative of the diversity of the world. They neither reflect the diversity of people working with knowledge, nor the diversity of knowledge to be shared. We also lack diversity amongst positions of responsibility. Among the common causes for the gender gap and other gaps in diversity in content and contributors is the lack of a safe and inclusive environment. This lack in the current culture of many Wikimedia projects limits the work and participation of existing communities and is a barrier for new people to join, including women, LGBTQ+, indigenous communities, and other underrepresented groups.
Referencia a Gender y a Women
-
-
meta.wikimedia.org meta.wikimedia.org
-
We will continually improve the design of our platforms to be inclusive and to enable everyone — irrespective of gender, culture, age, technological background or skills, or physical abilities — to enjoy a positive experience during both consumption and contribution to knowledge throughout the Wikimedia ecosystem.
Referencia a Gender
-
-
meta.wikimedia.org meta.wikimedia.org
-
The current power distribution within communities limits access to power positions for many, including women and other currently underrepresented profiles.
Referencia a Women
-
-
es.wikipedia.org es.wikipedia.org
-
Trayectoria
En esta sección se presentan los trabajos de la profesora.
-
Referencias
En las referencias aparecen los recursos que se han citado a lo largo del artículo.
-
[editar datos en Wikidata]
Los datos de esta infobox provienen del Wikidata de Remedios Zafra
-
-
<figcaption>history flow is a tool for visualizing dynamic, evolving documents and the interactions of multiple collaborating authors. In its current implementation, history flow is being used to visualize the evolutionary history of wiki* pages on Wikipedia. </figcaption>
</figure>