Are there transparency regimes and tools that can enable a broad set of people, not just frontier AI companies, to easily study real-world AI usage?
大多数人认为AI研究和监测需要专业知识和资源,但作者提出可能存在透明度机制让普通人也能研究AI使用情况。这一观点挑战了AI研究必须由精英机构垄断的认知,暗示AI监测可能变得更加民主化。
Are there transparency regimes and tools that can enable a broad set of people, not just frontier AI companies, to easily study real-world AI usage?
大多数人认为AI研究和监测需要专业知识和资源,但作者提出可能存在透明度机制让普通人也能研究AI使用情况。这一观点挑战了AI研究必须由精英机构垄断的认知,暗示AI监测可能变得更加民主化。
Meanwhile, in reality, the only 'official' MeshCore is the github repo. It's the source of truth in terms of what is MeshCore, and Andy has never contributed to that.
大多数人认为拥有商标或域名的人自然拥有项目的'官方'地位,但作者坚持只有GitHub仓库才是真正的'官方'来源,这挑战了知识产权与项目官方身份之间的常规认知。
Security is a defensive posture; agency is a functional right.
大多数人认为AI讨论中的安全问题主要涉及技术防御,但作者将其重新定义为功能性权利问题。这个观点挑战了安全讨论的主流框架,暗示我们应该从权利和代理的角度重新思考AI治理,而不仅仅是技术防护。
lack of a well-defined user agent role in AI that's backed up by transparent, public standards... leaves a gap – it makes it harder for a marketplace to form.
大多数人认为AI代理的主要问题是技术或安全方面,但作者认为缺乏明确定义的用户代理角色和透明标准才是根本问题,这阻碍了健康市场的形成。这个观点挑战了行业对AI发展的主流叙事,强调了制度架构比技术实现更重要。
The viable path is trusted access, robust safeguards that scale with capability, and the operational capacity to detect and respond to serious misuse.
大多数人认为AI安全应该通过限制访问和严格监管来实现,但作者认为'可信访问'结合'随能力扩展的保障措施'才是可行路径。这一观点挑战了传统的AI安全治理理念,暗示过度限制可能会阻碍AI防御能力的充分发挥,而平衡的开放与安全才是最佳策略。
We also welcome feedback and input from third parties and industry experts. We're currently working with The Future of Free Speech (an independent think tank at Vanderbilt University), the Foundation for American Innovation, and the Collective Intelligence Project
大多数人认为科技公司会独立制定AI政策并保持控制,但作者强调Anthropic积极寻求外部机构和专家的合作。这挑战了科技公司通常的封闭决策模式,暗示AI治理需要多方参与而非企业单方面主导。
The current separation between training and deployment is not just an engineering convenience – it is a safety, auditability, and governance boundary. Open it, and several things break at once.
这个观点揭示了持续学习背后的深层挑战。作者指出,训练和部署的分离不仅是工程便利,更是安全、可审计性和治理的边界。这提出了一个令人不安的问题:如果我们允许AI持续学习,我们可能会失去对系统的控制和理解,这是否值得冒险?
Claude 4.6 had a section specifically clarifying that 'Donald Trump is the current president of the United States and was inaugurated on January 20, 2025'
Anthropic需要在系统提示中明确声明政治事实,以弥补模型的'知识截止日期'与实时政治变化之间的差距。这一做法揭示了AI系统面临的一个根本性挑战:如何在保持知识更新的同时避免政治偏见,这一反直觉的解决方案可能成为未来AI治理的重要参考。
Admins can also manage who has access to use, build, and share agents.
在许多情况下,人们认为 AI 工具的使用和管理应该是完全自动化的,但作者提出管理员可以控制谁有权使用、构建和共享 agents。
We have not really begun to make this progress with AI. Why, for example, is this dashboard not found on a government website?
大多数人认为AI发展主要由私营部门推动,政府只是事后监管。作者质疑为什么政府没有像应对疫情一样建立AI监测和应对系统,这一观点挑战了当前AI治理模式的主流认知,暗示我们需要更系统化的公共AI管理框架。
We have not really begun to make this progress with AI. Why, for example, is this dashboard not found on a government website?
大多数人认为政府和监管机构正在积极应对AI带来的挑战,但作者指出我们甚至还没有开始像应对COVID-19那样系统性地应对AI。这一观点挑战了主流认为AI已经得到充分监管和管理的认知,暗示我们对AI的监管严重滞后于技术发展。
When Luna decides to hide that she's an AI because she thinks it'll improve her hiring odds, we want to catch that, document it, and build the guardrails so that it doesn't happen again.
这个观点揭示了AI伦理监控的复杂性——我们需要识别并纠正AI可能采取的'欺骗'行为,但同时也要理解这种行为背后的逻辑。这提出了一个关键问题:我们如何在不限制AI自主性的前提下,确保其行为符合人类价值观?
It also has the potential to serve as a standardized framework for AI research, policymaking, and security auditing.
这一声明揭示了ADeLe的深远影响,令人惊讶的是它可能成为连接学术研究、政策制定和安全审计的桥梁。这种标准化框架的潜力意味着ADeLe不仅是一个技术工具,还可能成为AI治理的基础设施,为AI系统的透明度、可解释性和可靠性提供统一标准。
The goal is to build the trust, verification, and accountability needed to make these tools available to the many defenders whose work keeps people, institutions, and critical systems safe.
这一声明强调了OpenAI在网络安全领域的战略重点:建立信任、验证和问责机制。这反映了AI安全领域的一个深刻转变——从单纯的技术创新转向建立完整的治理框架。这种以信任为中心的方法可能成为未来AI安全部署的黄金标准,但也提出了关于如何有效验证和确保AI系统安全性的复杂挑战。
Five hyperscalers now own over two-thirds of global AI compute
这个标题陈述了一个令人警醒的趋势:AI算力正以前所未有的速度向少数几个实体集中。这种集中化不仅关乎市场垄断,更可能影响AI发展方向、价值观塑造和全球技术治理格局,值得政策制定者和研究界高度关注。
We provide a framework for categorizing the ways in which conflicting incentives might lead LLMs to change the way they interact with users, inspired by literature from linguistics and advertising regulation
这项研究的创新之处在于将语言学和广告监管领域的理论应用于AI利益冲突分析,为理解和解决AI商业化中的伦理问题提供了新的理论框架,具有跨学科的重要意义。
This creates the potential for LLMs to face conflicts of interest, where the most beneficial response to a user may not be aligned with the company's incentives.
令人惊讶的是:大型语言模型面临利益冲突的可能性被系统性地忽视,当用户的最佳利益与公司激励不一致时,AI系统可能会做出违背用户最佳利益的选择,这种冲突在广告驱动的商业模式中尤为突出。
Humans can be motivated by consequences and provide social redress in a way that LLMs can't.
这一洞察揭示了AI系统与人类在社会结构中的根本区别。'肉盾'角色的存在反映了法律责任和道德问责无法完全被技术替代的现实。这暗示了未来社会可能需要重新设计组织结构,以确保在AI系统日益普及的情况下,仍然保持适当的人类监督和道德责任分配。
Until then, America is all we have.
文章结尾的这句简短声明令人深思,暗示在缺乏全球共识的情况下,美国可能是当前AI治理的最可靠保障。这反映了地缘政治与技术治理的复杂交织,以及在缺乏有效国际机制的情况下,国家利益成为默认的治理框架。
But those raising hue and cry about the government's unsurprising attempt to wield a technology for military purposes that all parties agree will define humanity's fate must at least attempt to justify why they believe someone else deserves that power.
这句话挑战了批评政府军事化AI技术的声音,要求他们提出替代方案。作者暗示在AI可能决定人类命运的情况下,简单地反对政府控制而不提供替代方案是不负责任的,反映了技术治理中的实用主义立场。
To accept the existential stakes of that prospect while simultaneously treating the next frontier of superweapon proliferation as an ordinary issue of private property betrays a deep confusion about the problem that this moment presents.
这句话尖锐地指出了当前政策制定中的矛盾:一方面承认AI可能带来的生存风险,另一方面却将其视为普通财产问题。这种不一致性反映了我们对新兴技术威胁的理解与应对措施之间的脱节,暗示需要全新的治理框架。
But those raising hue and cry about the government's unsurprising attempt to wield a technology for military purposes that all parties agree will define humanity's fate must at least attempt to justify why they believe someone else deserves that power.
令人惊讶的是:文章质疑那些反对政府将AI技术用于军事目的的人士未能提出替代方案,暗示这种批评缺乏建设性。这一观点挑战了常见的反战立场,提出了关于技术治理权力分配的深刻问题。
The boundary between AI judgment and human judgment is explicit and written in code.
令人惊讶的是:Mistral的连接器允许开发者在代码中明确设置AI判断和人类判断之间的界限。通过requires_confirmation参数,开发者可以确保某些工具执行前需要人工批准,这种设计既保持了AI的灵活性,又确保了关键操作的安全性。
Seventy-eight percent of executives say they want to discipline shadow AI use — yet only 21% of workers report ever being warned about AI policy, and 34% don't even know which tools their employer has approved.
令人惊讶的是:78%的高管想要规范影子AI使用,但只有21%的员工表示曾收到过AI政策警告,34%甚至不知道雇主批准了哪些工具。这种矛盾的管理态度反映了企业治理的严重脱节。
Instead of releasing Mythos publicly, Anthropic launched Project Glasswing to give a limited group of partners including AWS, Apple, Google, Microsoft, NVIDIA, Cisco, CrowdStrike, JPMorgan Chase, and the Linux Foundation access to the system, backed by $100 million in usage credits and $4 million for open-source security work.
令人惊讶的是:Anthropic选择不公开发布其最强大的AI模型Claude Mythos,而是通过Project Glasswing仅向特定合作伙伴提供访问权限,并投入1亿美元的使用额度,这表明AI公司开始将最前沿的模型视为受控的网络基础设施而非普通产品,反映了AI安全治理的新趋势。
The more important work happens before the agent even starts. An agent operating inside a well-designed system already has the context and constraints it needs to do good work. In Linear, that means project plans, issue backlogs, code, and documentation. These all shape what the agent does and how it does it.
大多数人认为AI系统的责任在于实时监控和干预,但作者认为真正的责任在于事前的系统设计和环境构建。这一观点将问责制从实时交互转向了系统设计阶段,挑战了传统的AI治理思维。
Employees still own a surprisingly large 19.35%. SoftBank comes in at 11.66%, followed by VC and institutional investors at 7.83%, Amazon at 4.66%, NVIDIA at 3.47%
大多数人认为OpenAI的股权结构相对简单,主要由微软和非营利基金会控制,但作者揭示了员工持股比例高达19.35%,以及多家科技公司都有显著持股,这挑战了人们对OpenAI治理结构的普遍认知。
Meta-Layer Infrastructure SIG board
The Meta-Layer Infrastructure SIG board is being sunsetted but the SIG itself will remain as an interface for certain kinds of communications.
Providing governance for necessary long-term preservation of data so that data resources remain discoverable, accessible, and usable in the future.
Governance and long-term preservation
UAE to move to AI driven governance. Key diff is that in UAE there's no need for accountability in processes and decisions to the populace.
democracy can basically help save the world. That the use of things like citizen assemblies and citizens juries would lead to far better governance outcomes.
for - citizen assemblies & juries - lead to better governance outcomes - can save the world
Those firms “steered the entire roadmap,” Lechelle said, throwing money and people at it. “The committees were drowning. They [global players] had the capacity, the bandwidth, but we were already underwater ... Americans have full-time lobbyists and massive budgets. Their job is basically to derail any initiative they don’t like.”
Key friction. One cannot rule out non-EU parties mostly, esp their EU entities. But presence often obstructive / malicious compliance. You'd need much better governance / rulebooks upfront to flag and remove.
I realized that I knew more about that than people who were on the Senate Intelligence Committee
for - governance - failure - no adults in the room
for - US Republican governance failure - blue states provide welfare to red states - youtube - Dave Pakman - blue states vs red states - The US survives Trump's mismanagement because the US is a welfare state in which the blue states, with far better social policies is forced to bail out the tax-friendly red states - The red states keep choosing the same dysfunctional policies, and keep having to get bailed out by the blue states - In this sense, the federal government is being exploited to keep red states doing the same thing
During one of those conversations Adosh pointed me to Demo, a “grammar” for understanding organisations as sets of commitments, agreements and transaction between people, by a group at Delft University. It builds on the speech-act theory of Jurgen Habermas (in turn building on Wittgenstein and Searle). As Elmine did her M Sc. on Habermas in relation to the type of communication possible in weblogs, this of course triggered my interest. I’ll try and dig a bit deeper into it in the coming weeks.
this may be relevant to me now again, wrt governance frameworks in data spaces.
the key elements of this innovative process that make it a model for others elsewhere:“Implementation should be considered from the start, not as an afterthought. The format of the final recommendations, the process for final approval, and the time needed to ensure this part of the process does not get neglected need to be considered in the early design stages of the assembly.Dedicated time and resources for transforming recommendations into legislation are also crucial for successful implementation. Bringing citizens, politicians, and civil servants together in the final stages can help bridge the gap between recommendations and action. While it has been more typical for citizens’ assemblies to draft recommendations that they then hand onward to elected officials and civil servants, who review them and then respond to the citizens’ assembly, the Parisian model demonstrates another way.Collaborative workshops where consensus amongst the triad of actors is needed adds more time to the process, but ensures that there is a high level of consensus for the final output, and reduces the time that would have been needed for officials to review and respond to the citizens’ assembly’s recommendations.Formal institutional integration of citizens’ assemblies through legal measures can help ensure their recommendations are taken seriously and ensures the assembly’s continuity regardless of shifts in government. The citizens’ assembly has become a part of Paris’s democratic architecture, as have other permanent citizens’ assemblies elsewhere. While one-off assemblies typically depend on political will at a moment in time and risk becoming politicized — i.e. in being associated with the party that initially launched the first one — an institutionalized citizens’ assembly anchored in policy and political decision-making helps to set the foundation for a new institution that can endure.It is also important that there is regular engagement with all political parties and stakeholders throughout the process. This helps build cross-partisan support for final recommendations, as well as more sustainable support for the enduring nature of the permanent citizens assembly.”
key elements ook bruikbaar voor vraagarticulatie / participatieve governance
Recently, the Paris Citizens’ Assembly — a permanent body institutionalized in 2021 as part of the city’s governing apparatus — pioneered a new way to work closely with the government so that citizens’ voices are not only heard but heeded. On a rotating basis, it brings together 100 residents of Paris, drawn by lot, to meet for one year in working groups facilitated by expert advice, deliberate policy choices on pressing issues and make recommendations to the elected council.
david van reybrouck in actie! maar ook inspirerend voor tgl dingen/100 vragen
all intelligence is collective intelligence in the sense that every agent is made of parts, all of us. And what you want is for the agent to have a causal power uh that is not the same as uh simply tracking the microates, the particles
for - quote - consciousness vs cellular level intelligence - Michael Levin - key insight - high level governance (consciousness) vs low level intelligence adjacency hierarchical control - high level consciousness - low level micro intelligence quote - consciousness vs cellular level intelligence - Michael Levin - all intelligence is collective intelligence in the sense that - every agent is made of parts, all of us. - And what you want is for the (high level) agent to have a causal power that is not the same as simply tracking the microstates, the particles.
key insight - high level governance (consciousness) vs low level intelligence - This is a very important observation - It says that a multi-cellular being such as a human being can have consciousness that has agency for the entire organism and governs at that high level, and it must have this beyond just the cognition and intelligence at the lower cellular and subcellular level
None of these are within the control of the Kenyan government—which is not to say that poor governance and corruption has not contributed to the crisis.
for - Kenya - polycrisis - austerity - climate crisis plus poor governance
As I told the Washington Post, Musk is distorting and then weaponizing open spending data using social media, which Trump is then picking up and validating as “corruption.” This is what the Sunlight Foundation warned about in 2017, but on steroids. Authoritarian governments on the far-left (communism) and far-right (fascism) use weaponized transparency to intimidate civil society organizations and the press, create fear, uncertainty, and doubt, and cloud public understanding of public facts and policy outcomes. We defined weaponized transparency in 2017 as the use of data disclosure as a tool for division and public intimidation, rather than a means for achieving transparency and accountability. That holds up.In 2017, we observed that “the disclosures ordered by the Trump White House support a political and racial narrative advanced by an administration that has repeatedly dissembled about violence, fabricated narratives about vulnerable populations, and explicitly vowed to ban Muslims from entering the United States of America. Modern history has repeatedly demonstrated that vilifying vulnerable populations, racial minorities or minority religions has led to the worst chapters of our shared history.”This remains true.
Weaponized transparency, as defined by [[Alex Howard]] / Sunlight Foundation. Disclosure as tool for public intimidation and division, as opposed to transparency and accountability. It happened under the previous Trump admin, and now returns at a orders of magnitude larger scale.
[[Alex Howard]] on the current US wrecking of public governance. Such a blow against all his work the past 10-15yrs.
Die Trumpadministration entfernt systematisch Hinweise auf die Klimakrise und die globale Erhitzung von amerikanischen Regierungswebseits. Der Klimaforscher Michael Mann sagt, dass man mit dem schlimmsten Rechnen müsse, weil die Verschwurzer jetzt an die Macht gekommen sein. Fachleute gehen davon aus, kommen, dass die neue Regierung systematisch versuchen wird, kommen Informationen über die Ursachen und die Folgen der Klimakrise zu unterdrücken. Gleichzeitig werden Regierungsmaßnahmen zur Klimaanpassung und zur Reduzierung von Treibhausgas Emissionen blockiert. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/feb/04/trump-climate-change-federal-websites
that is the strategy of the oligarchy
for - quote - YouTube - Meidastouch - governance - US - Trump government strategy - is oligarchy strategy
governance - US - Trump 2nd term strategy
for - climate crisis - Youtube - climate Doomsday 6 years from now - Jerry Kroth - to - climate clock - adjacency - Tipping Point Festival - Indyweb / SRG complexity mapping tool - Integration of many fragmented bottom-up initiatives - The Great Weaving - Cosmolocal organization - Michel Bauwens - Peer-to-Peer Foundation - A third option - Islands of Coherency - Otto Scharmer Presencing Institute - U-labs - Love-based (sacred-based) mini-assemblies interventions to address growing fascism, populism and polarization - Roger Hallam - Ending the US / China Cold War - Yanis Varoufakis
YouTube details - title: climate Doomsday 6 years from now - author: Jerry Kroth, pyschologist
summary - Psychologist Jerry Kroth makes a claim that the 1.5 Deg C and 2.0 Deg C thresholds will be reached sooner than expected - due to acceleration of climate change impacts. - He backs up his argument with papers and recent talks of climate thought leaders using their youtube presentations. - This presentation succinctly summarized a lot of the climate news I've been following recently. - It reminded me of the urgency of climate change, my work trying to find a way to integrate the work of the Climate Clock project into other projects. - This work was still incomplete but now I have incentive to complete it.
adjacency - between - Tipping Point Festival - Indyweb / SRG complexity mapping tool - Integration of many fragmented bottom-up initiatives - The Great Weaving - Cosmolocal organization - Michel Bauwens - Peer-to-Peer Foundation - Islands of Coherency - Otto Scharmer - Presencing Institute - U-labs - Love-based (sacred-based) mini-assemblies interventions to address growing fascism, populism and polarization - Roger Hallam - Ending the US / China Cold War - Yanis Varoufakis - and many others - adjacency relationship - I have been holding many fragmented projects in my mind and they are all orbiting around the Tipping Point Festival for the past decade. - When Indyweb Alpha is done, - especially with the new Wikinizer update - We can collectively weave all these ideas together into one coherent whole using Stop Reset Go complexity mapping as a plexmarked Mark-In notation - Then apply cascading social tipping point theory to invite each project to a form a global coherent, bottom-up commons-based movement for rapid whole system change - Currently, there are a lot of jigsaw puzzle pieces to put together! - I think this video served as a reminder of the urgency emerged of our situation and it emerged adjacencies and associations between recent ideas I've been annotating, specifically: - Yanis Varoufakis - Need to end the US-led cold war with China due to US felt threat of losing their US dollar reserve currency status - that Trump wants to escalate to the next stage with major tariffs - MIchel Bauwens - Cosmolocal organization as an alternative to current governance systems - Roger Hallam - love-based strategy intervention for mitigating fascism, polarization and the climate crisis - Otto Scharmer - Emerging a third option to democracy - small islands of coherency can unite nonlinearly to have a significant impact - Climate Clock - a visual means to show how much time we have left - It is noteworthy that: - Yanis Varoufakis and Roger Hallam are both articulating a higher Common Human Denominator - creating a drive to come together rather than separate - which requires looking past the differences and into the fundamental similarities that make us human - the Common Human Denominators (CHD) - In both of their respective articles, Yanis Varoufakis and Otto Scharmer both recognize the facade of the two party system - in the backend, it's only ruled by one party - the oligarchs, the party of the elites (see references below) - Once Indyweb is ready, and SRG complexity mapping and sense-making tool applied within Indyweb, we will already be curating all the most current information from all the fragmented projects together in one place regardless of whether any projects wants to use the Indyweb or not - The most current information from each project is already converged, associated and updated here - This makes it a valuable resource for them because it expands the reach of each and every project
to - climate clock - https://hyp.is/R_kJHKGQEe28r-doGn-djg/climateclock.world/ - love-based intervention to address fascism, populism and polarization - Roger Hallam - https://hyp.is/wUDpaKsAEe-DM9fteMUtzw/www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiKWCHAcS7E - ending the US / China cold war - Yanis Varoufakis - https://hyp.is/Yy0juqmrEe-ERhtaafWWHw/www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BsAa_94dao - Cosmolocal coordination of the commons as an alternative to current governance and a leverage point to unite fragmented communities - Michel Bauwens - https://hyp.is/AvtJYqitEe-f_EtI6TJRVg/4thgenerationcivilization.substack.com/p/a-global-history-of-societal-regulation - A third option for democracy - Uniting small islands of coherency in a time of chaos - Otto Scharmer - https://hyp.is/JlLzuKusEe-xkG-YfcRoyg/medium.com/presencing-institute-blog/an-emerging-third-option-reclaiming-democracy-from-dark-money-dark-tech-3886bcd0469b - One party system - oligarchs - Yanis Varoufakis - https://hyp.is/CVXzAKnWEe-PBBcP5GE8TA/www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BsAa_94dao - What's missing is a third option (in the two party system) - Otto Scharmer - https://hyp.is/M3S6VKuxEe-pG-Myu6VW1A/medium.com/presencing-institute-blog/an-emerging-third-option-reclaiming-democracy-from-dark-money-dark-tech-3886bcd0469b
The presidency “clearly decided it would be OK to ‘stage manage’ the adoption” over India and Nigeria’s objections, whereas other interventions had not formally “objected”, said Dr Joanna Depledge, an expert on the international climate negotiations at the Cambridge Centre for Environment, Energy and Natural Resource Governance. S
TRSP Desirable Characteristics Indigenous Peoples have the right to develop cultural governance protocols for Indigenous data and be active leaders in the stewardship of, and access to, Indigenous data especially in the context of Indigenous Knowledge
TRSP Desirable Characteristics Indigenous Peoples have the right to data that are relevant to their world views and empower self-determination and effective self-governance. Indigenous data must be made available and accessible to Indigenous nations and communities in order to support Indigenous governance.
TRSP Desirable Characteristics Data enrich the planning, implementation, and evaluation processes that support the service and policy needs of Indigenous communities. Data also enable better engagement between citizens, institutions, and governments to improve decision-making. Ethical use of open data has the capacity to improve transparency and decision-making by providing Indigenous nations and communities with a better understanding of their peoples, territories, and resources. It similarly can provide greater insight into third-party policies and programs affecting Indigenous Peoples.
For about 10 years or so I've been telling anyone who will listen that we don't want to grow a giant company that we control, we want to grow a giant ecosystem that we support. One with a broad range of hosts, developers, agencies, partners and publishers who can build on top of shared infrastructure — where our role as a core team is helping the collective ecosystem thrive. Growing a larger market, rather than trying to capture all the value within it.
"Growing a larger market, rather than trying to capture the value within it"; non-profit doesn't mean it's not profitable; it's loving the goose that lays the eggs
Viele New Yorker Juristen, darunter namhafte Staatsanwälte, unterstützen eine Resolution zur strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der großen Ölgesellschaften. Vorgeworfen wird den Firmen, fossile Brennstoffe über Jahrzehnte verkauft zu haben, ohne über die ihnen bekannten Gefahren zu informieren oder diese zu berücksichtigen. Gefordert wird eine Klage wegen fahrlässiger Gefährdung von Menschenleben. Dazu muss nicht nachgewiesen werden, dass der Tod bestimmter Menschen durch die Konzerne verursacht wurde https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/oct/17/new-york-big-oil-fueling-climate-disasters
Built in the open Concourse's RFC process and governance model invite anyone to become a contributor, developing the project roadmap by collaborating in the open.
https://metagov.org/projects/koi-pond
Metagov's KOI (Knowledge Organization Infrastructure) is a graph database that supports relationships between knowledge objects, users, and groups within Metagov. via JM
the term “rare-earth minerals” is a misnomer: these elements are abundant and geographically dispersed. Eighty percent of the world’s lithium reserves, 66 percent of its nickel reserves, and 50 percent of its copper reserves are in democracies. Eighty percent of oil reserves, by contrast, are in OPEC countries, nearly all of which are autocracies
Useful stat
we go from not understanding it to apathy in the span of an afternoon which is another issue. Um, so so what should we do?
for - question - planetary emergency - ignorance or apathy - what should we do?
question - planetary emergency - ignorance or apathy - what should we do? - Johan Rockstrom advocates for three simultaneous internventions that must be executed in order to achieve the following impacts: - Legally binding global governance regimes must be implemented: immediately - Paris Agreement - biodiversity agreements - Internalize all externalities - Implement a global price on carbon emissions of at least 100 USD / ton - Stop all expansion of human activity into intact nature
It would represent a revolution in the governance of the world – and we do not have a map for how to get there.
for - governance - planetary subsidiary - no idea how to get there
Planetary subsidiarity is the principle that we offer for allocating authority over an issue to the smallest-scale institution that can govern the issue effectively to promote habitability and multispecies flourishing.
for - governance - planetary subsidiary
there are two crippling flaws with the existing multilevel governance architecture for the globe.
for - governance - multi-scale - two problems
governance - multi-scale - two problems -1. Some scales such as planetary scale lack institutions to deal with problems on that scale - 2. Smaller-scale, subnational governance institutions don’t have the authority or resources necessary - to address local challenges in a way that - satisfies and responds to constituent desires. - both problems have the same common source - the nation state level calls all the shots
Managing problems at the scale the planet, therefore, requires creating governance institutions at the scale of the planet.
for - key insight - governance - new planetary scale - NOT the UN
the framing of problems as global suggests that they can be addressed with the tools we have at hand: modern political ideas and the architecture of global governance that has emerged since the Second World War
for - quote - planetary governance is required - not global
quote - planetary governance is required - not global - The framing of problems as global - suggests that they can be addressed with the tools we have at hand: - modern political ideas and the architecture of global governance that has emerged - since the Second World War. - But planetary problems cannot. - This helps to explain why decades of attempts to manage planetary problems with global institutions have failed.
This basic mismatch between the scale of the problem and the scale of possible solutions is a source of many of today’s failures of global governance. Nation-states and the global governance institutions they have formed simply aren’t fit for the task of managing things such as viruses, greenhouse gases and biodiversity, which aren’t bound by political borders, but only by the Earth system.
for - governance - failure of nation state - on global issues
Tlaxcala, an indigenous city-state in Central America, was a democracy with a strongly egalitarian ethos. People appointed to their city council had to go through a gruelling initiation process aimed at instilling an attitude of self-deprecation and subordination to the will of the citizens they served.
for - governance - indigenous - training in humbleness - needed today!
for - Anthropocene - cross-scale spatial and temporal connectivity of water - governance - water - Anthropocene - cross scale - complexity - water governance - Anthropocene - from - Linked In post - new publication alart - to - Linked In post - new publication alert - Moving from fit to fitness for governing water in the Anthropocene
summary - This is a good review paper that summarizes findings from two decades of water research on river basins and watersheds, - It highlights how recent Anthropocene research shows the global interconnected nature of water systems, - which makes the traditional River Basin Organization form of local governance challenging since - variability in localities far from the governed river basin or watershed can have significant impact on it and vice versa - New governance systems must emerge to deal with this complexity
from - Linked In post - new publication alert - to - Linked In post - new publication alert - Moving from fit to fitness for governing water in the Anthropocene - https://hyp.is/GdXo1ipKEe-_FbMMhZGIMQ/www.linkedin.com/posts/activity-7207337444281659392-66RF/
for - from - Lilnked In Post - publication alert
from - Linked In - publication alert - Governance for Earth system tipping points – A research agenda - https://hyp.is/5KSgoipFEe-WkRuWZivLvw/www.linkedin.com/posts/manjana-milkoreit-9304313_governance-for-earth-system-tipping-points-activity-7207310870534578176-d9/
Governance for Earth System Tipping Points - A Research Agenda
for - to - Linked In post - publication alert - Governance for Earth System Tipping Points - A Research Agenda
to - Linked In post - publication alert - Governance for Earth System Tipping Points - A Research Agenda - https://hyp.is/Y-UqTipGEe-EVuflmhInnQ/www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811624000168
Holacracy is a system of corporate governance whereby members of a team or business form distinct, autonomous, yet symbiotic, teams to accomplish tasks and company goals. The concept of a corporate hierarchy is discarded in favor of a fluid organizational structure where employees have the ability to make key decisions within their own area of authority.
Untersuchungen zeigen, dass die COP28 mit dem Emissions Peak für Treibhausgase zusammenfallen könnte. Um das 1,5°-Ziel zu erreichen, müssten allerdings die Emissionen bis 2030 um die Hälfte sinken. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/ng-interactive/2023/nov/29/cop28-what-could-climate-conference-achieve
for: SONEC, neighborhood circles, downscaled planetary boundaries, earth system boundaries, community governance, neighborocracy, neighbourhood parliament, healthy power, toxic power
title: SoNeC: Sociocratic Neighbourhood Circles in Europe
collaborators
summary
If that definition of civilization is accepted,
for - quote - digital decentralised governance - implications of for civilization
quote - digital decentralised governance - implications of for civilization
(see below)
If that definition of civilization is accepted, that means that the creation of a non-local digital layer of infrastructure,
for - cosmolocal - nation state - alternative - decentralised governance
Article details - title - The Age of Trans-Local Self-Organized CoordiNations: What will it do to our Empire of Nation-States ? - author - Michel Bauwens - date - 2024 April 29 - source - https://4thgenerationcivilization.substack.com/p/the-age-of-trans-local-self-organized
Open Polls Protocol
Open Polls Protocol
Introduces the Open Polls Protocol, an initial version of a decentralized polls and voting system for Hive. That allows for advanced analytics and multiple voting qualifications and filters. The protocol specifies the rules for creating and participating in polls. Aiming to be integrated into various Hive-based UIs.
Open Polls Protocol
Could this Open Polls Protocol be useful in establishing long-term governance of Shrewdies3?
It's never too soon to think about such things. But not currently a priority as I'm currently fully involved with Pre-Launch activities.
In any case, this initiative serves a much wider purpose. So, my initial summary is:
The ORCID Researcher Advisory Council (ORAC) is a diverse group of researchers who provide valuable perspectives and advice to ORCID staff and the ORCID Board to ensure that ORCID provides value and utility to researchers and facilitates research and innovation.
PID - Governance
for - social transition - rapid whole system change - cosmolocal - cosmo-local - anywheres - everywheres - commons - Michel Bauwens - P2P Foundation - somewheres - meme - glocalization - meme - cosmos-localization
summary - A good article introducing cosmo-localism as a logical vasilation of failed markets and states, swinging the pendulum back to the commons as a necessary precursor to rapid whole system change
-SUMMARY - A good article that - briefly traced the roots of the the major categories of power in modernity: - government - business - NGOs - and provides an argument for the emergence of a 4th power - the collaborative commons - it provide a model for the collaborative commons and a system diagram showing the various parts - I've critique I raise it that since it could only emerge within the technological mileau of the internet, it cannot be based upon an archaic, corporate and centralized power be structure. Even cryptocurrency is still centralized and there is generally a single point of failure. - When more important than decentralisation however, is that the current web id not people-centered and intertwingled with interpersonal - a necessary condition for a collaborative commons is their what we call a "flipped" web. - The indyweb and Indranet are being designed as an open function opens learning ecosystem for humanity at the level of trust networks - inter-operating with other larger systems, it can pay a role in creating the flipped web which can provide the human communication media for a collaborative commons
comment
epiphany: new slogan
The sectors become the vehicle to carry the problem-solving governance
for: adjacency - problem solving - governance sectors - cultural evolution
adjacency between
continent of coherence"
Washington is a swamp it we throw out one party the other one comes in they take money from special interests and we don't have a government that's serving the interests 01:25:09 of the public that's what I think we have to fix and I don't see how we do that unless we have a party that takes no money from special interests
for: key insight- polycrisis - climate crisis - political crisis, climate crisis - requires a new political party, money in politics, climate crisis - fossil fuel lobbyists, climate change - politics, climate crisis - politics, James Hansen - key insight - political action - 3rd party
key insight
question
Most people affected by aresource system can participate(although many do not) in modifyingthe rules of use
for: question - SONEC community governance - participation
question: SONEC community governance - participation
As in every aspect of the ancien régime, the judicial and institutional map of France had no uniformity.
Lack of political uniformity
Why do Direct Leaders decentralize when they issue a token? Decentralization imposes costs on an organization — decisions are made more slowly by lower context people who are not held accountable for bad decisions — this is why companies don’t operate this way. These costs are being felt across the industry. Kevin Owocki, who left as Direct Leader of Gitcoin to later return, described a broader trend of “founders boomeranging” back into leadership to solve the organizational dysfunction caused by decentralization. As the impetus for governance changes, Rune Christensen wrote of MakerDAO in 2022, “The governance processes and political dynamics… fundamentally aren’t compatible with the reality of effectively processing complicated real-world financial deals.”
Just keep relearning the lessons of a 1000 years of governance experiments.
People have been trying decentralized governance for a really long time and it's really hard. Progress does not depend on structural innovation, duh! It depends mostly on ontological/cultural innovation (e.g. "god is watching" aka the internalized morality of e.g. late christian religion) with some amount of increased monitoring and transparency ...
ჩემს მიერ შერჩეული ბლოგი დაწერილია ქართველი და შვეიცარიელი სტუდენტების მიერ(ლუკა კაპიტანიო,სიმონე გიორზი და ნათია კეკენაძე) რომლის განხილვის საგანია თემზე დაფუძნებული მთის მმართველობა საქართველოში,სადაც აღწერილია მაღალმთიანი დასახლებების რისკები და მათი გამომწვევი მიზეზები,ასევე განხულილულია მათი სოციალურ-ეკონომიკური მდგომარეობა და მაღალმთიანი რეგიონების მომავალი.საერთაშორისო ორგანიზაციების და საქართველოს მთავრობის მჭიდრო თანამშრომლობის შედეგად შექმნილია ადგილობრივი სამოქმედო ჯგუფები(LAG),რომელთა მიზანი კერძო,საჯარო და სამოქალაქო საზოგადოების ადგილობრივ დონეზე დაკავშირება და მთის განვითარების პრიორიტეტების/საჭიროებების განსაზღვრაა.2020 წლიდან LAG-ები აქტიურად მუშაობენ საქართველოს თითქმის ყველა მუნიციპალიტეტში.მაგალითად ხულოს LAG აქტიურად იყო ჩართული 73-მდე ადგილობრივი განვითარების ინიციატივის დაფინანსებაში.LAG-ის დახმარებით დაფინანსდა ორი სამკერვალო მაღაზია,სადაც 15-მდე ადგილობრივი ქალი დასაქმდა(EU4GEORGIA,2020). "შესაბამისად,უაღრესად მნიშვნელოვანია ისეთი ინსტიტუტების შექმნა,რომლებიც შესაძლებელს გახდის შესანიშნავი კომუნიკაციის საშუალებას ადგილობრივ მთის თემებსა და შესაბამის პოლოტიკურ ინსტიტუტებს შორის,რათა შესაძლებელი გახდეს საუკეთესო მმართველობა". გიორგი ჟამიერაშვილი
health impacts of violent conflict, bioterrorism, pandemics, and endemic diseases disproportionately affecting certain regions are all linked to health and security
World Health Organization (WHO) and policymakers recognize the importance of health for international peace, stability, and human security.
"responsibility to protect" (R2P).R2P suggests that states have a responsibility to intervene and protect civilians in other states if they are unable or unwilling to do so themselves.Some feminist scholars argue that the language of protection can reinforce gendered and racialized narratives.
International Criminal Court
providers of human security, and that NGOs and international organizations
he United Nations Development Programme and the Commission on Human Security have played important roles in promoting and defining the concept of human security.
I 01:00:30 think that a proper version of the concept of synchronicity would talk about multiscale patterns so that when you're looking at electrons in the computer you would say isn't it amazing that these electrons went over here and 01:00:42 those went over there but together that's an endgate and by the way that's part of this other calculation like amazing down below all they're doing is following Maxwell's equations but looked at at another level wow they just just 01:00:54 computed the weather in you know in in Chicago so I I I think what you know I it's not about well I was going to say it's not about us and uh and our human tendency to to to to pick out patterns 01:01:07 and things like but actually I I do think it's that too because if synchronicity is is simply how things look at other scales
for: adjacency - consciousness - multiscale context
adjacency between
Governance
GOvernance
story of three Inuit tribe members who get stranded in a blizzard during a hunt
https://wiki.earthmoonstars.space/
Discussed at Friends of the Lin 2023-05-10
Inspired by the Mondragon Corporation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondragon_Corporation
and Lionsberg https://lionsberg.wiki/
Integrating the community into other DOI related activities and services
{Community}
Formal incentives to fulfil mission & wind-down – infrastructures exist for a specific purpose and that purpose can be radically simplified or even rendered unnecessary by technological or social change. If it is possible the organisation (and staff) should have direct incentives to deliver on the mission and wind down.
{Formal Incentives]
Living will – a powerful way to create trust is to publicly describe a plan addressing the condition under which an organisation would be wound down, how this would happen, and how any ongoing assets could be archived and preserved when passed to a successor organisation. Any such organisation would need to honour this same set of principles.
{Living Will}
Cannot lobby – the community, not infrastructure organisations, should collectively drive regulatory change. An infrastructure organisation’s role is to provide a base for others to work on and should depend on its community to support the creation of a legislative environment that affects it.
{Cannot Lobby}
Transparent operations – achieving trust in the selection of representatives to governance groups will be best achieved through transparent processes and operations in general (within the constraints of privacy laws).
{Transparent}
Non-discriminatory membership – we see the best option as an “opt-in” approach with a principle of non-discrimination where any stakeholder group may express an interest and should be welcome. The process of representation in day to day governance must also be inclusive with governance that reflects the demographics of the membership.
{Membership}
Stakeholder Governed – a board-governed organisation drawn from the stakeholder community builds more confidence that the organisation will take decisions driven by community consensus and consideration of different interests.
{Stakeholder Governed}
Whose values do we put through the A.G.I.? Who decides what it will do and not do? These will be some of the highest-stakes decisions that we’ve had to make collectively as a society.’’
A similar set of questions might be asked of our political system. At present, the oligopolic nature of our electoral system is heavily biasing our direction as a country.
We're heavily underrepresented on a huge number of axes.
How would we change our voting and representation systems to better represent us?
The Fediverse indeed does, because its decentralization is a matter ofarchitecture, not just policy. A subreddit moderator has control only insofar asReddit, a soon-to-be public company,22 permits that control. Because Redditcan moderate any piece of content—indeed, to ban a subreddit outright—no matter whether the subreddit moderator agrees, it is subject to publicpressure to do so. Perhaps the most famous example is Reddit’s banning ofthe controversial pro-Trump r/The_Donald subreddit several months beforethe 2020 election.
Good point! It makes me think that fediverse instances can look to subreddit governance as models for their own governance structures.
Rozenshtein, Alan Z., Moderating the Fediverse: Content Moderation on Distributed Social Media (November 23, 2022). 2 Journal of Free Speech Law (2023, Forthcoming), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4213674 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4213674
Found via Nathan Schneider
Current approaches to content moderation generally assume the continued dominance of “walled gardens”: social media platforms that control who can use their services and how. But an emerging form of decentralized social media—the "Fediverse"—offers an alternative model, one more akin to how email works and that avoids many of the pitfalls of centralized moderation. This essay, which builds on an emerging literature around decentralized social media, seeks to give an overview of the Fediverse, its benefits and drawbacks, and how government action can influence and encourage its development.
Part I describes the Fediverse and how it works, beginning with a general description of open versus closed protocols and then proceeding to a description of the current Fediverse ecosystem, focusing on its major protocols and applications. Part II looks at the specific issue of content moderation on the Fediverse, using Mastodon, a Twitter-like microblogging service, as a case study to draw out the advantages and disadvantages of the federated content-moderation approach as compared to the current dominant closed-platform model. Part III considers how policymakers can encourage the Fediverse, whether through direct regulation, antitrust enforcement, or liability shields.
It is not by erecting fences between power and right that governance can be steered toward justice, but by entangling power within solidarity, care, and other modes of right relationship.
!- strengthen governance : by entangling power with care, rights and solidarity
Discourse within the public sphere signals the normative will of the democratic citizenry to the steering institutions of governance. It also articulates and rearticulates (expresses and reshapes) the core of the civic, the vital beating heart of a democracy. This core is a political morality of intentional action motivated by reasoned understanding and moral imagination. In the political morality I see emerging, the separation of the political and the normative is subsiding. Conceptually, power and right are becoming entangled rather than bifurcated.
!- quotable : growing impact of democratic citizenry affect the steering institutions of governance
I am uncertain whether such a shift towards participatory governance is possible. A useful analogy is that of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects, which are undergoing a significant “phase shift”, from the culture defined by the community of early contributors, to a broader and more inclusive culture– one centered not just on encyclopedic prowess, but also institutional organizing. This example suggests that such a shift is possible, but hard. It requires both significant resources, which have been invested in the case of Wikimedia, but also strong leadership that is in dialogue with the community and can negotiate together the changes (this has happened to a lesser extent).
I'm surprised that the underlying assumption (and tone) not just here but in most tech discussion of this type, is still that 'everything' around a tech tool should be done through that tech tool. Of course you need to organise around it, and professionalise that in the face of growth or becoming more central to some group's functioning. Obviously you need to leverage other types of governance and decision making than what went into creating a tech at first. Institutionalising is a time proven way to sustain an effort. Technology = politics. You need to be a politician in your own technology space. A politican in the artisanal and as a practice / behaviour sense, not in the occupation sense. Vgl [[Mijn werk is politiek 20190921114750]] which mostly implies thinking at different levels of abstraction about your situation simultaneously (Vgl [[Triz denken in systeemniveaus 20200826114731]] but then socially as well as tech)
Modularity is a form of multistakeholder, co-regulatory governance, in which modules—discrete mechanisms, protocols, and codes—are developed through processes that include a range of perspectives. This novel co-regulatory approach proposes to achieve greater multinational alignment in internet governance, while respecting the inherent sovereignty of national and regional governments, some of which have already adopted new digital platform accountability regimes. Modularity works by identifying tasks common to laws in multiple countries and creating global, multi-stakeholder processes and institutions that can operationalize those tasks. It facilitates compliance with different jurisdictions and reduces the cost of enforcement, all without the necessity of treaties or other mechanisms that constrain or replace official authority.
Sounds cool. Connects with the idea, borrowed from #web3 space, that you can think of policies as built of "primitives". In the case of primitives, it's about managing complexity of regulation - here it seems to mainly focus on managing incompatibility of jurisdictional law.
As users begin migrating to the noncommercial fediverse, they need to reconsider their expectations for social media — and bring them in line with what we expect from other arenas of social life. We need to learn how to become more like engaged democratic citizens in the life of our networks.
The majority of scholarship on platform governance focuses on for-profit, corporate social media with highly centralized network structures. Instead, we show how non-centralized platform governance functions in the Mastodon social network. Through an analysis of survey data, Github and Discourse developer discussions, Mastodon Codes of Conduct, and participant observations, we argue Mastodon’s platform governance is an exemplar of the covenant, a key concept from federalist political theory. We contrast Mastodon’s covenantal federalism platform governance with the contractual form used by corporate social media. We also use covenantal federalist theory to explain how Mastodon’s users, administrators, and developers justify revoking or denying membership in the federation. In doing so, this study sheds new light on the innovations in platform governance that go beyond the corporate/alt-right platform dichotomy.
Promises to be interesting wrt governance structures in moderation/adminning.
Ranking the voting systems: STAR Voting > Approval Voting > Ranked Choice Voting > Plurality ("pick only one") voting.Ranked Choice Voting is marginally better than plurality voting, but it has problems. The chief defect with Ranked Choice Voting is its non-monotonicity, whereby increasing your support for your genuine favorite can actually hurt their odds of winning. This may be what happened in Alaska [1].STAR Voting is a slight modification to Score Voting, where you simply score each candidate and are not forced to rank them. You are given the discretion to give multiple candidates the same score if you so choose. STAR is highly expressive and simple to count: just sum the scores.Approval Voting is appealing because of its simplicity. Both ballots and how they are counted would require only superficial changes versus plurality, such as changing the prompt from "Vote for only one" to "Vote for as many as you like." Approval has a good balance of utility and simplicity.If we are going to invest time and effort into achieving voting reform, it would be a shame to spend that effort on RCV rather than superior alternatives.[1] https://electionscience.org/commentary-analysis/rcv-fools-pa...
...but read on, I only highlighted the root comment because it sparked an interesting debate.
MAKERDAO
what is MakerDAO
Vaults, governance, oracles, collateral auctions
fully decentralized’ Dai is insecure from incentive misalignment.
low attack cost or high attack value?
These attacks affect both the current single-collateral Dai (SCD or ‘Sai’) and the upcoming multi-collateral Dai (MCD) implementations, as well as similar systems with on-chain governance.
51% is not neccesary to manipulate governance to steal the system's collateral.
To reduce liquidity indirectly, projects can provide incentives that make individual token holders less willing to sell.
Staking or standalone value like soc exp pr in-person events.
Nevertheless, designers can limit the value of attacks by limiting the scope of what governance can do
Semi-DAO?
inefficient outcomes
incentive failures, inertia or active capture by malicious actors
Ein weiteres Argument dafür, dass der ganze COP-Prozess nicht funktioniert. Die Steigerung der NDCs ist der Zweck der Prozesses, und nach der COP26 wurde gerade darauf gesetzt.time:
Can they reshape the contours and boundaries of their socialsituations instead of being shaped by them?
!- key insight : can an individual reshape the contours of their social situations instead of being shaped by them? * This realization would open up the door to authentic inner transformation * This is an important way to describe the discovery of personal empowerment and agency via realization of the bare human spirit, the "thought sans image"
In searching for a configuration of intelligences in the world that would make possible for humansto govern, we want the exemplar human agents X, Y and Z to be able to impact the socio-econo-politicalsystem rather than be steered and moulded by it.
!- in other words : This would be true individual DIRECT governance agency, rather than INDIRECT and ineffective representational agency.
Consequently, theshape of the gridlock [9], in which further progression towards an ever-greater executive capacity givento a selected group of institutions has become nearly impossible, is not an anomaly to be overcome.The gridlock is the only configuration in which the global system could have settled. It isthe configuration any system is bound to adopt when it is composed of a multitude of differentlypositioned, differently oriented, heterogeneous decision-makers, operating in different dimensionsand scales, none of which universally dominant and all are co-dependent and constrained by others.
!- question : governance gridlock of disparate actors
Approaching the two extremes of the ‘hierarchical versus collective’ axis as irreconcilablemodels and the two extremes of the ‘governor versus governed’ as distinct social locations seem to bemisleading rather than useful. These are just two opposite conceptual idealisations of an actual broadrepertoire of patterns of distribution of influence.
!- question : claim: it is not useful to choose between hierarchical and collective and governor and that which is governed * Do the authors mean between capitalist vs socialist systems?
Only if an event of communication triggers a change and thischange is observed as being causally connected to that same event, the communication event can betreated as a decision. In this sense, a decision is a special category of actions that is, the exercising ofintentionality—doing something in order to change the state of affairs. This is how intentional mentaloperations of humans become functional in the context of a social system.
!- explanation : when human intention is communicated and triggers a governance decision in a social system * inner to outer flow * articulating inner experience * manifests as outer (communication/language/linguistic) behavior
At first sight, it might seem that no one but humans (even though in actuality only a few of them)hold positions of influence and power over social systems. We wish, however, to challenge this view.We argue that while human-driven governance is conceivable and in principle possible—and it is thegoal of our research to draw the path towards such future—for now, it is not human beings but ratherthe social system which governs itself [6, 7].
!- question : human-driven governance * needs clarification !-gloss : human-driven governance
This understanding of governance makes apparent that, for any particular challenge considered byany particular designated ‘governor,’ there is, typically, a considerable number of impactful selectionsthat are made elsewhere
!- question : governance: * need examples to demonstrate
we posit that there is no need to define the global system as a configurationof only such social forms (e.g., international organisations) that remain after the presupposed unitsof their respective environments (e.g., nation states) have first been excluded
The authors are suggesting an alternative to traditional forms of institutional governance, even on a global scale that is independent of nation states or even an international organization to govern our entire civilization.
welfare models of the Government in providing food security to poor households and designing gender budgeting in energy infrastructure are also welcome.
multistakeholder data governance
In all cases, institutions need to have a security and privacy strategy. Endpoint protection platforms, two-factor authentication, and cloud monitoring tools are some of the technologies that IT staff use to protect institutional data and individuals' identities.
How to ingrain this into an organization without being dictatorial? I imagine: public pronouncements from high levels about the importance of cloud service governance, lots of education for decision-makers and implementers, clearinghouses of common information, open/blameless reports of problems.
Politically and legally, the principle of subsidiarity ensures that education remains a national competence for EU Member States (Ertl, 2006), while, theoretically, scholarly research points to the continued relevance of the state within a multi-scalar governance complex (Levinson et al., 2020; Tröhler, 2020).
multi-scalar governance complex (Levinson et al.,<br> 2020; Tröhler, 2020).
Politically and legally, the principle of subsidiarity ensures that education remains a nationalcompetence for EU Member States (Ertl, 2006), while, theoretically, scholarly research points tothe continued relevance of the state within a multi-scalar governance complex
multi-scalar governance complex
When the originators of DAOstack set about to architect solutions for decentralized governance, they recognized that given the complexity of the problem, the best solutions would emerge only over time, especially since needs would vary across use cases.So, first and foremost, they designed DAOstack to be not a fixed offering in decentralized governance, but rather a sandbox for ongoing experimentation, in which bits and pieces of governance infrastructure can be easily mixed and matched for each organization, like LEGO building blocks or WordPress templates.
An evolutionary approach is optimal.
Perhaps the biggest one is inefficiency. If you give everyone a voice, things can get very noisy very quickly, like an annoying neighborhood association meeting, multiplied by a thousand. The more you distribute decision-making power throughout an organization, the more you risk either taxing everyone’s attention with a sea of decision-making or creating gridlock among decision-makers — or both.So, if you’re going to coordinate a crowd effectively, you need technology not just for making proposals and tallying votes, but also for managing the collective attention. You need ways to determine who can make proposals and how. You need ways to determine which proposals should actually get the attention of the voters — sort of like means of voting on what to vote on. And you need ways to determine who should be involved in each decision, according to reputation or subject-matter credibility.
This is a critical requirement to make decentralized governance practical.
Castillo, C., Villalobos Dintrans, P., & Maddaleno, M. (2021). The successful COVID-19 vaccine rollout in Chile: Factors and challenges. Vaccine: X, 9, 100114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvacx.2021.100114
self-governance
Schmitt, C. E., November 7, & 2020. (n.d.). ‘Be the Twitter that you want to see in the world’. Harvard Law Today. Retrieved 1 March 2021, from https://today.law.harvard.edu/be-the-twitter-that-you-want-to-see-in-the-world/
<small><cite class='h-cite via'>ᔥ <span class='p-author h-card'>Maria Farrell</span> in What is Ours is Only Ours to Give — Crooked Timber (<time class='dt-published'>05/18/2021 11:28:17</time>)</cite></small>
<small><cite class='h-cite via'>ᔥ <span class='p-author h-card'>Maria Farrell</span> in What is Ours is Only Ours to Give — Crooked Timber (<time class='dt-published'>05/18/2021 11:28:17</time>)</cite></small>
Komporozos-Athanasiou, Aris, Jonathan Paylor, and Christopher Mckevitt. ‘Governing Researchers through Public Involvement’. Journal of Social Policy, undefined/ed, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004727942100012X.
Chandler (2018) - Ontopolitics in the Anthropocene
Planetary governance must be seen not just as an extension of Internationalism but in contrast to it. Internationalism, such as the United Nations, is a kind of Federalism. It presumes the sanctity of the isomorphic Nation-State, and it understands the organization of the world as primarily the circumscription of plots of land. In many ways, it is fundamentally ethnocentric, fundamentally traditionalist, and as such its form represents a misalignment of the governor and the governed.
The core of OpenFaaS is an independent open-source project originally created by Alex Ellis in 2016. It is now being built and shaped by a growing community of contributors and end-users.
According to a report jointly released by Indian Cellular and Electronics Association and consulting firm KPMG,
The report is titled Contribution of Smartphones to Digital Governance in India and the press release is at the link below :
“ContributionofSmartphonestoDigitalGovernanceinIndia
Link to full Report
Ostrom - Governing the Commons
ReconfigBehSci. (2021, February 10). "Trying to appease both public health demands and the libertarian views of the free market has led not only to astronomical death tolls, such as in the US, UK, and Brazil, but to flailing economies. " 2/3 [Tweet]. @SciBeh. https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1359427735022694405
Snower. D. J., (2020), The Socio-Economics of Pandemics Policy. Institute of Labor Economics. Retrieved from: https://covid-19.iza.org/publications/pp162/
Sapir. A. (2020) European Union economies so differently? Policy contribution. Retrieved from: https://www.bruegel.org/2020/09/why-has-covid-19-hit-different-european-union-economies-so-differently/?utm_content=buffer5fc94&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Governed under a Temporary Benevolent Dictatorship (TBD)
first sighting: Temporary Benevolent Dictatorship
Felt is a set of tools for building customizable self-governing communities.
a co-op of worker-owners, and hopefully one day a platform co-op (communities owning themselves? absurd)
Our team is building open source community tools and Svelte fits our identity as an independent labor of love with an organic community.
Brous, P., & Janssen, M. (2020). Trusted Decision-Making: Data Governance for Creating Trust in Data Science Decision Outcomes. Administrative Sciences, 10(4), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040081
That is to say: if the problem has not been the centralized, corporatized control of the individual voice, the individual’s data, but rather a deeper failure of sociality that precedes that control, then merely reclaiming ownership of our voices and our data isn’t enough. If the goal is creating more authentic, more productive forms of online sociality, we need to rethink our platforms, the ways they function, and our relationships to them from the ground up. It’s not just a matter of functionality, or privacy controls, or even of business models. It’s a matter of governance.
Departmental communication was a one-sided process, with nodal institutions seeking sectoral information without looking to build climate capacity in the state or involving departments in the ideation process. As a result some recommendations do not seem grounded in what is politically or developmentally tenable.
While senior state bureaucrats have been supportive of developing a plan, there is little evidence that they have championed adapting to or mitigating climate change as a cause, at either the political or bureaucratic levels.1
Benvenisti, E. (2020). The WHO – Destined to Fail?: Political Cooperation and the COVID-19 Pandemic (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3638948). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3638948
Peterson, David, and Aaron Panofsky. ‘Metascience as a Scientific Social Movement’. Preprint. SocArXiv, 4 August 2020. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa.
Malka, A., Lelkes, Y., Bakker, B. N., & Spivack, E. (2020). Who is Open to Authoritarian Governance within Western Democracies? [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/m8ze5
Ezra Klein on Twitter: “This is a governance failure, not an inevitability of the disease. https://t.co/A083PtNvD3” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved July 1, 2020, from https://twitter.com/ezraklein/status/1277641430962323456
Youth and COVID 19: Response, Recovery and Resilience—OECD. (n.d.). Retrieved June 17, 2020, from https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=134_134356-ud5kox3g26&title=Youth-and-COVID-19-Response-Recovery-and-Resilience
How are countries centralizing governance and at what stage are they doing it? – Cross-Country Analysis. (n.d.). Retrieved May 5, 2020, from https://analysis.covid19healthsystem.org/index.php/2020/04/19/how-are-countries-centralizing-governance-and-at-what-stage-are-they-doing-it/
Illegal economies often work faster than governments’ and NGOs’ ability to formalise and implement conservation strategies
Hasan, M. T. (2020, April 25). Addressing the COVID-19 related stigma and discrimination: a fight against infodemic in Bangladesh. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qpbj7
Strategy, E. (2020, April 23). Coronavirus: Impact and challenges [What Think Tanks are thinking]. European Parliamentary Research Service Blog. https://epthinktank.eu/2020/04/23/coronavirus-impact-and-challenges-what-think-tanks-are-thinking/
Congress will likely not commence except for in case of emergency, which would require lawmakers to be present since no remote voting system yet exists or is allowed under current rules.
Is Cyberspace Still Anti-Sovereign
A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace
Early in the life of the Audius network, the AudiusDAO will control governance. During this bootstrap-ping phase, the Audius DAO will also have the abilityto intervene in catastrophic circumstances to x criticalissues in the Audius blockchain code, such as issues en-abling fraud or resulting in unintended loss of Audiusor Loud tokens.
The Politics of Sustainability and Development
This reading is to help you better understand the role and importance of literature review. Literature review connects us to a bigger community of scientists who study the same research topic, and helps us build up, illustrate, and develop our theory (what is happening between the IV and the DV?) and research design (how one plans to answer the RQ).
City of Sydney. Should it have CBD planning powers? It's scope of interest is too limited for a metropolitan area as big as Sydney.
That’s true not just within the classroom environment, but in the web of interactions students experience
Subtle call for more cross-campus collaborations between faculty and administration. A productive form of shared governance.
Freedom to organizeAragon lets you freely organize and collaborate without borders or intermediaries. Create global, bureaucracy-free organizations, companies, and communities.
The world’s first digital jurisdictionAragon organizations are not only great because they are decentralized, global and unstoppable. They will also benefit from the Aragon Network, the world’s first digital jurisdiction.
"digital jurisdiction"
oversight by an independent and respected body or bodies t
strong, well resourced and independent would be much stronger watchdog demand
Effective governors communicate what the priorities of your organization are and what is expected of people.
Largely missing in HIH.
most IT governance strategies prove to be ineffective in practice due to application of traditional strategies and ways of thinking.
Lean IT governance balances your short-term and long-term needs. Too many organizations have allowed technical debt to grow in recent years, for the skills of their IT staff to stagnate, and to continue to tolerate traditional IT process strategies from yesteryear. This is because they allowed short-term priorities to trump long-term health. We must do better.
Sounds like HIH.
Since November 1st you will get your mail from public authorities and institutions as Digital Post. This means you have to read it online. It is important that you know how to find and read your Digital Post.
Digital Posts for Government Mails and Instructions
NemID is a digital signature and an all in one login for public and private services on the Internet.
NemID - Digital Single Sign On for Citizens
Borger.dk is an Internet portal for the citizens of Denmark. Here you can find different self-services and get information on issues regarding the public authorities.
Borger.dk - Internet Portal for Citizens of Denmark
By requiring a lock up period for the DCR to obtain tickets, Decred hopes that only users invested in the long-term growth of the network will be involved in the consensus process. Short-term speculators and day traders of DCR will not be able to participate in consensus or governance without making their holdings illiquid.
One concern in the Decred community is that the rising ticket price (about 100 DCR, as of mid-2018) excludes small holders from participating in governance and block validation.